![]() |
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3 (hoax). Bbb23 ( talk) 02:37, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Not intrinsically notable. Maybe merge with Ebola virus cases in the United States? smileguy91 talk 22:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hoax? The article's only reference is a link to the bed & breakfast in Monrovia. It doesn't mention anything about disease. I didn't find it reported elsewhere, either. Art LaPella ( talk) 23:29, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was KEEP. There were no arguments for deletion. Discussion of a possible merger with James Paterson can be initiated at the respective talk pages. (non-admin closure) -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
A basic disambiguation page which should be merged/redirected into James Paterson. There is no need for separate dab pages for all first name variances, especially with this one - are you really going to have separate dabs for James, Jamie, Jim, Jimmy etc.? Serve no useful purpose, and actually hinders navigation if you don't know what name-variant the person you are looking for is known by on Wikipedia Giant Snowman 20:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Merge Most of those entries seem to be about the footballers anyway. Sadfatandalone ( talk) 01:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 23:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable actress, appears to have been in only one thing. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 21:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Lots of OR and SYNTH, created by author of the "theory". No independent references (those that are not by Gavrilov were published even before this "theory" was formulated. No indicatiàon of meeting WP:GNG, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 20:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
are quite convincing. This article exists for a long time (since 2006), providing important information to the public, and it is a result of successful cooperation of many contributors, participating in this project. -- 128.135.235.49 ( talk) 15:20, 16 December 2014 (UTC) — 128.135.235.49 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Promotional article on publicist. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO, relies mainly on college/self-published articles totally insufficient for a BLP. Coretheapple ( talk) 17:33, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Coral Springs Center for the Arts. MBisanz talk 04:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Local museum with no evidence of notability, but prod removed on the absurd notion that "museums are notable", again without evidence. Created by the blocked sock of a disruptive user, but it's been edited too much to qualify for G5. Nyttend ( talk) 17:26, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
by Marcus, Jonathan. South Florida Sun-Sentinel [Fort Lauderdale, Fla] 20 May 2012: p.1. That article is all about the museum and its longtime Executive Director. It mentions that "the nonprofit museum, which is affiliated with the city, has developed a niche in South Florida's art scene. The museum's first annual budget was approximately $121,000 while this year it is about $500,000." I get 377 hits on exact string "Coral Springs Museum of Art" in a national newspapers database behind paywall, many being reviews of new exhibits. -- do ncr am 19:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment. In this edit, editor User:Jllm06 redirected the AFD topic article to another article. I just reverted that, pending resolution of this AFD, per technical AFD policy described in the AFD notice at the article. Jllm06's edit is helpful in pointing out that, prior to the February 2014 creation of this article, there was pre-existing coverage of the museum topic at a different article. It seems reasonable for the AFD to be concluded with "Merge/redirect" or just "Redirect", as there was not substantially different content created at the AFD topic (newer) article. -- do ncr am 21:42, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 06:13, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Local church with no evidence of notability, but prod removed because the only source ( a blog) thinks that it's important. Created by the blocked sock of a disruptive user, but it's been edited too much to qualify for G5. Nyttend ( talk) 17:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 21:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE Harsh (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 23:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Seams like non-notable group. No reliable independent sources to establish the wp:notability. Vanjagenije ( talk) 16:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Keurig. The strongest arguments against stand-alone retention are WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, and, assuming the article was genericized in its current form, WP:UNDUE. I picked Keurig as the merge target because a box must be filled in, but that's obviously not set in stone and content is free to be merged elsewhere as anyone feels is appropriate, with the consensus at the various destination(s) determining how much of that content to integrate, if any. slakr\ talk / 05:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Softlavender ( talk) 18:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR) ( non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (state) @ 21:32, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
This belongs to the Wikidictionary, not to the encyclopedia. Basically, this article is about Japanese word for solitude. Vanjagenije ( talk) 15:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Captain Sensible#Politics. czar ⨹ 22:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Barely meets any Wikipedia policy on notability, and as a political party, fails to have any significance or notability either 'in real life' or to satisfy Wiki policies. doktorb words deeds 09:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 23:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Unsourced article, no indications of notability Primefac ( talk) 17:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by Jimfbleak per WP:G11 and WP:G12. ( non-admin closure) Anupmehra - Let's talk! 11:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Possibly unremarkable person, unsourced article smileguy91 talk 17:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a G12 copyright violation. Mojo Hand ( talk) 05:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This entry does not meet WP:GNG. If anyone can find reliable sources it might be included at Bitcoin but I'm doubtful that there is anything significant out there. Tchaliburton ( talk) 17:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable individual. I believe the page to be autobiographical
WP:AUTOBIO
Periglio (
talk)
16:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The underlying issues of the AfD nomination are: (a) the article's being "autobiographical", and (b) Marco Tiggelaar's not being a notable person.
The subject of this article is Marco Tiggelaar; I am the writer of the article, but I am not Marco Tiggelaar. Therefore, the article is not autobiographical.
Let us review Wikipedia's definition of Notability:
For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" – that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life. "Notable" in the sense of being "famous" or "popular" – although not irrelevant – is secondary.
The key phrase used by Wikipedia to define notability is "worthy of notice". "Worthy of notice", in turn is defined by any one of the following adjectival phrases:
Marco Tiggelaar is neither famous nor popular, especially if measured using the standards of the entertainment and music industries or the number of followers/"likes" in the social network industry. However, since fame or popularity are not the primary considerations for notability, the following arguments focus on "worthy of notice".
The arguments presented here in favor of Marco Tiggelaar and the article about him are documented in the websites cited as references in the article.
December 2011 exchange of public messages in the forum
(
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zenloadbalancer.user/month=20111201)
First point: The depth of Marco Tiggelaar's technical questions addressed to the original developers of Zen Load Balancer and his confident offer of assistance based on his knowledge of the Linux/Unix operating systems. – Openly and unconditionally offering to assist a major software developer based on his confident knowledge of Linux/Unix in spite of his being "not much into" development makes him significant.
Second point: The way he describes a Microsoft product: "I really want to replace the dumb Microsoft load balancer as you might understand lol :)" – The fact that he has the guts to call the product of the world's most popular software company "dumb" without mincing words makes him at least unusual, if not interesting, although he may not necessarily be considered significant in this particular instance.
Are his being unusual, interesting and significant in this case enough to deserve attention and to be recorded? Perhaps not necessarily, if only this single case is considered. There are three more cases following.
WordPress plugin page
(
https://wordpress.org/plugins/key4ce-osticket-bridge/developers/)
Point: WordPress is currently the most popular content management system in the world. Part of its popularity is the availability of free themes and plugins from international contributors that help make designing websites painless. Marco Tiggelaar happens to be the author of a plugin called Key4ce osTicket Bridge which helps web developers using WordPress include a help desk system in their website projects. The plugin page of Key4ce osTicket Bridge in WordPress reports a star rating of 4.4 out of 5, and the recorded number of downloads of the plugin is 2,596. – For an individual like Marco Tiggelaar to have his work given prominence within the pages of a renowned site like WordPress, it is tantamount to WordPress unilaterally proclaiming his significance.
The download record may not have made him public sensation but it must have been interesting and significant from the point of view of 2,596 people who downloaded copies of the software into their computers; otherwise, they would simply have ignored it.
Aside from making him significant, his plugin contribution to WordPress also makes him interesting and unusual, especially after considering the fact that WordPress itself as well as the themes and plugins offered in its website are free to use by the world public.
Engagement with users in the support forums
(
http://www.websitepanel.net/members/m-tiggelaar/)
First Point: WebsitePanel is described as a multi-tenant, Enterprise hosting automation tool with support for private cloud servers. It enables hosting businesses to centralize the management of their hosting infrastructure and share resources across multiple customer accounts. It is a product appreciated only by a few customers (because they are a rare class): those who provide hosting services to ISPs and other networked organizations. – Any person, including Marco Tiggelaar, who chooses to devote one's time for the benefit of this product without direct compensation is unusual enough to deserve attention and is therefore notable.
Second Point: The owner of WebsitePanel considers Marco Tiggelaar's technical credentials significant enough to warrant membership in its web community and responsibility in moderating three support forums, namely: General Discussions, Core Modules, and Enterprise Modules. – To take on these responsibilities, again without pay, certainly gives him points not only as far as being significant is concerned, but also being interesting and unusual.
Third Point: Marco Tiggelaar who casually talks about "IIS management", "FTP service", "NAT address", "firewall", "MySQL", "MSSQL", "auditlog", "eventlog", "Enterprise solution", "Hosting plan", "Mailbox plan", "127.0.0.1:9002", "Scheduler conf", "Global space", and "Autodiscover" in the WebsitePanel support forums. – Only an unusual individual churns out technical jargon like these on a daily basis.
Non-technical people may not perceive Marco Tiggelaar's being significant, but his technically savvy audience in the support forums apparently do because they look up to him for opinions or answers to technical questions.
Developing and releasing a high-value product for free
(
https://virtualpf.com/about/virtualpf/)
Point: VirtualPF is a firewall service or appliance running entirely within a virtualized environment, providing the usual packet filtering and monitoring that a physical firewall provides. It is forked from a predecessor product called pfSense with the intention to make it available for free to users. Marco Tiggelaar himself, with the help of two associates, worked on this product and it is now available to the whole world -- free of charge.
Does this make Marco Tiggelaar significant? Interesting? Unusual enough to deserve attention and to merit or to be recorded?
Network users throughout the whole world, unconditionally and without discrimination, stand to benefit from the added dimension of network security that they get from VirtualPF, courtesy of Marco Tiggelaar. He deserves gratitude, and this makes him significant enough to deserve attention or to be recorded. This alone is sufficient to meet the definition of "worthy of notice".
The 100% virtualization support that VirtualPF provides makes the job of administrators of complex network infrastructures worldwide easier. This makes him interesting enough to deserve attention or to be recorded; and this, too, by itself is sufficient to meet the definition of "worthy of notice".
Virtual PF is a complex piece of software, and Marco Tiggelaar put in much time and effort (a given in the world of software development) to bring it out to its intended beneficiaries without thought of financial gain. Considering that most people do this kind of work only if there's big money in it, this makes him unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded. Standing alone, this argument is also sufficient to meet the definition of "worthy of notice".
Since Marco Tiggelaar is worthy of notice, the article written about him passes Wikipedia's standard of notability. Therefore the AfD nomination under consideration lacks merit and must be withdrawn. Kaguchi ( talk) 11:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Tragic but nothing not notable murder/crime. ...William 16:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 19:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
An undistinguished pornstar failing both WP:GNG and WP:PORNSTAR. Her only award was a scene-related one. She has made no unique contributions to porn, has never starred in any blockbusters, and is not in any Hall of Fame. She received some some minor, non-mainstream coverage in the Spanish media (A documentary called "Come to my Las Vegas, Baby" on Canal+) that is not widespread enough to fulfill the demands of WP:GNG. Redban ( talk) 15:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. WP:SK #1: Withdrawn nomination w/ all "keep" votes – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
100% of the article is unsourced material about a living person. Complying with WP:BLP essentially requires blanking the page, until someone takes enough of an interest to author a sourced article. CorporateM ( Talk) 15:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as copyvio. If someone independent of the subject is interested enough in him to write an independent article, we can judge the notability of that once it happens, but there doesn't seem to be any point in holding a full discussion over an article that's essentially just a straight copy of a web site. — David Eppstein ( talk) 02:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Tagged for notability for two years. A few quick searches reveal only brief mentions and nothing where Mr. Covello is the subject of a substantial work. CorporateM ( Talk) 15:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Just useless. Several identically sourced/formatted articles have recently been deleted at AfD, eg:
As I said then, what is the point of this, bearing in mind that the lead says "The appearance of a particular tribe as Rajput in the list does not in itself confirm that the tribe is Rajput or otherwise. Identity may change with time, and some groups in the list may no longer identify themselves as Rajput." Also bear in mind that the 1911 census was not reliable, being subject to the huge misunderstandings resultant from the influence of H. H. Risley and other scientific racists. It's basically just a transcription of a primary source. One past AfD was contested at WP:DRV but the outcome remained the same. Sitush ( talk) 17:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Not notable party, against GNG and other policies. Not a political party with any achievements of note, and with no lasting cultural significance. doktorb words deeds 09:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Today (U.S. TV program). If anyone wants to merge what little substantial content there is, they're free to do so. Mr. Z-man 21:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Little references and most of the article is one section (Matt's Travel Locations). Little evidence of WP:NOTABILITY, it's just a segment on the Today show. StewdioMACK ( talk) 08:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep it!! just because you don't like it dose not meen you can delete it Jena ( talk) 14:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:43, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
An uncelebrated pornstar, she fails WP:PORNSTAR with the absence of any major / substantial industry awards and no widespread coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. She has a Hall of Fame induction for "Urban X," but this achievement is not "equivalent" to the AVN or XRCO Hall of Fame, as required by WP:PORNSTAR (3). The Urban X Hall of Fame is new, and it lacks obvious Hall of Famers (ie - Serenity, Mark Davis, Jenna Jameson), which makes me consider it insignificant. Urban X gives its awards through fan-voting, so their Hall of Fame criteria is likely flimsy. Redban ( talk) 08:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitten (pornographic actress)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora Jolie
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devlin Weed
Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_January_24#Carmen Hayes
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cherokee_D'Ass_(3rd_nomination)
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kaiya_Lynn
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Victory (2nd nomination)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirra Lynne
I know of no discussions resulting in a keep (under the current "well-known and significant" standard, which by consensus was made more restrictive than mere notability). If Scott Boras were to create a "hall of fame" for collegiate baseball players, and most of the members turned out to be young players he represented, there would be little argument that the "award" didn't demonstrate notability. One person's actions don't create an "industry award"; one person giving trophies out that primarily promote her husband's business interests is clearly not significant. Note that the only sources related to to this award, both in this article and the award article, are Urban X's own announcements. Clear GNG failure, no other plausible claim to notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 15:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 21:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Uncelebrated pornstar who fails WP:Pornbio, as the rules clearly exempt awards for scenes. She also has not starred in any blockblusters or made any unique contributions to porn. She has no substantial coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Redban ( talk) 08:29, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 21:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This topic about a liqueur does not meet WP:GNG. Several source searches are not providing significant coverage in reliable sources. Prod was declined and the deprodder added a primary source, but this does not establish notability. NorthAmerica 1000 08:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 21:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Many binary international relations are notable, but this is a mere notice of the establishment of relations between an micro-nation and a major country with whom it has no substantial connection. Neither has a resident ambassador or even consulate with the other, DGG ( talk ) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete as the article was created by a sockpuppet of User:Holy Child Student and hasn't received significant contributions from other editors. @ DGG: @ LibStar: this person keeps coming back, so could you please let me know if you see similar articles? They don't seem to understand that it takes me seconds to delete what must be taking them quite a while to add... Nick-D ( talk) 23:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Many binary international relations are notable, but this is a mere notice of the establishment of relations between an micro-nation and a country on the other side of the world. DGG ( talk ) 08:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mr. Z-man 21:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
insufficient evidence of notability. Almost all sources are published by the company or press releases DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete & redirect to Sissel Kyrkjebø discography. czar ⨹ 21:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a random collection of songs. Although the songs may be notable, the collection probably isn't. All references are {{ bsr}} and it is unclear how the sources have been used for compiling the article. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). Note that this close does not preclude a potential merge of the article. NorthAmerica 1000 21:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Short article on a proposed referendum that never happened. Article ends with speculation that it may happen in future, but this is WP:CRYSTAL and the article can easily be restored if it is given the go ahead. Current content (the issue was about changing the electoral system) could easily be covered in Elections in Bulgaria or National Assembly (Bulgaria) in one or two sentences. Number 5 7 13:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 23:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Based on results of recent AfD nominations of articles on my watchlist, I am renominating this article for deletion on the rationale of WP:PROMO. Article was created by WP:SPA editor who may have a commercial (or academic) conflict of interest in relation to the edits in the article edit history. I read sources on this topic extensively, and the product is not described in such approving terms as in the article by anyone but its developers in the professional literature. [19] [20] WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 02:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar ⨹ 21:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominating for DELETION as fails NOTABILITY. There does seem to have been some local notability as the references come from periodicals/newspapers local to the north-east of England and the software did make no. 86 on a list of free software in PC mag but there are no references to be found on Google Books or Scholar. The external software page does not exist anymore. The firm seems never to have been more than a 2-person firm. In fairness to the article, it's not that spammy compared with some of the other stuff out there, but I don't believe it merits a page. U2fanboi ( talk) 13:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar ⨹ 21:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
I can find no coverage of this skateboarding game and no indication the subject meets the General notability guideline. The sources cited in the article are a blog and an online skateboarding dictionary. This article appears to be the only relevant Ghit. Even the basketball game H-O-R-S-E, on which this game appears to be modelled, has only a section dedicated to it in the article Variations of basketball; based on the lack of coverage, I don't think this subject merits a standalone article. -- Rrburke ( talk) 15:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Dea
db
eef
15:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 18:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Listcruft. Per WP:LISTN has not been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. Per WP:STAND has no lead; and indeed no sources that are used to show NOTABILITY of group. each person in list has their own source with none repeated Jytdog ( talk) 04:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Jytdog started this request for deletion when people who did not have good outcomes from ECT were added and today continues to edit the article in favor of his point of view by removing the description "psychiatric survivor" and "elecroshock survivor". https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_people_who_have_undergone_electroconvulsive_therapy&diff=637908569&oldid=637906735 -- Mark v1.0 ( talk) 20:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per CSD F9 as unambiguous copyright infringement. No source is provided for the file, and it appears to have been copied from somewhere. As such, the licensing information on the file page under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version and Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License is incorrect, in which the uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder of this work of the image, which is virtually certain to be false. Furthermore, the written content of the page was in an incorrect namespace, is mostly duplicated at User:BHUMIJ LANGUAGE/sandbox, and an article already exists at Bhumij. NorthAmerica 1000 04:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Article created in file namespace which is likely not to meet notability standards. Stifle ( talk) 09:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Effectively unsourced promo article, crystal bol, doubtful notability The Banner talk 13:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Ion Bazac. czar ⨹ 21:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
The article relates to a proposed Formula One team that was planned for the 2015 Formula One season. However, the entry list for the 2015 season has been published without mention of the team, and the question of whether or not the team ever existed beyond paper cannot be verified. Although there are articles for teams that never existed, such as USF1 Team, in this case there is no physical evidence that Forza Rossa existed at all. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 03:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Milk Queen. czar ⨹ 21:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Unremarkable beauty pageant Gbawden ( talk) 14:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Redirect to Milk Queen, without prejudice in the event that someone wants to spend the time sourcing this. There are indeed old news articles from back in the day, and I found use of the term in novels, non-fiction and essays as a kind of placeholder for a certain kind of authentic, rural America. A solid, reliably sourced article could be written, but until/unless it is, WP readers are better served by a redirect to Milk Queen. And now let's get serious, Would you like Maple Walnut or Rocky Road? ShulMaven ( talk) 20:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 20:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
I can't find references that show this to be notable in any way. Fails WP:GNG. Tchaliburton ( talk) 03:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). NorthAmerica 1000 21:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
The article fails WP:GNG. The record label has not been discussed in reliable sources. The only artist signed to the label is Patoranking. Per WP:INHERITORG, a record label cannot inherit notability from the artists they're associated with. Versace1608 (Talk) 05:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 08:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Hoax? I can't find anything at all to confirm this. Neither this nor this nor (most clearly) this give any useful results. There is a "Golden Ball" at the end of the Asian Cup [24], but that is something different than what is described here (different set of players, not annual, ...). Fram ( talk) 08:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
No it's not a hoax. For now, most of the news of this award can only be found on Chinese websites, but this award is existed. The 24 journalists are come from almost all AFC countries, and three European journalists from L'Equipe, La Gazzetta Dello Sport and Goal.com, only one of them is Chinese journalist, so I think this award is credible. And here is the news about Honda accepted this award in San Siro on Mar 16th, 2014 (Photo provided): http://soccer.titan24.com/2014-03-17/251224.html. And here the news about Son won the award in 2014 and journalists' comments on players: http://cnsoccer.titan24.com/2014-11-28/327188.html. Cirolchou ( talk) 09:28, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete as unsourced BLP. If sources have been found, the article may be recreated.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a television personality, relying almost entirely on primary sources with only a single linkrotted bare URL to indicate that anything here was ever properly verifiable in a reliable source. She might certainly qualify for a Wikipedia article if one can be written that cites proper reliable source coverage, but simply existing is not a notability freebie if the sourcing isn't there. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 03:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable musician fails WP:MUSICBIO Philg88 ♦ talk 09:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.[note 6] This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses.
Drasar Monumental is half of a duo with MF Grimm, who is a prominent hip hop artist and comic book writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Swann ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Not a notable academic. He may in retirement head a department of a somewhat obscure, caste-ist educational institution and he may have written/translated quite extensively but neither qualifies him for an article on Wikipedia. Sitush ( talk) 09:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. NorthAmerica 1000 00:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
A hardly notable periodical made by George Richards and Camilla Hall, two students at the University of Edinburgh. Most edits are made by User:Gergis, who tried to improve notability by editing other articles (like this one). Meanwhile the 'journal' is no more than a weblog. No links to external sources, and I could not find a reference to the at the University of Edinburgh's website. Jeff5102 ( talk) 13:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of TV5 TV and radio stations-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable & unverifiable subject; no reliable sources that can establish its notability. Theenjay36 ( talk) 01:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
What we have here is a list of people who are mostly non-notable. As a collective they are no more notable. I think it could make sense to list notable players (like scoring leaders or MVPs) on the main 2014 World Junior A Challenge page, but there's no value in listing the entire roster of each team. Tchaliburton ( talk) 01:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3 (hoax). Bbb23 ( talk) 02:37, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Not intrinsically notable. Maybe merge with Ebola virus cases in the United States? smileguy91 talk 22:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Hoax? The article's only reference is a link to the bed & breakfast in Monrovia. It doesn't mention anything about disease. I didn't find it reported elsewhere, either. Art LaPella ( talk) 23:29, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was KEEP. There were no arguments for deletion. Discussion of a possible merger with James Paterson can be initiated at the respective talk pages. (non-admin closure) -- MelanieN ( talk) 01:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
A basic disambiguation page which should be merged/redirected into James Paterson. There is no need for separate dab pages for all first name variances, especially with this one - are you really going to have separate dabs for James, Jamie, Jim, Jimmy etc.? Serve no useful purpose, and actually hinders navigation if you don't know what name-variant the person you are looking for is known by on Wikipedia Giant Snowman 20:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Merge Most of those entries seem to be about the footballers anyway. Sadfatandalone ( talk) 01:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 23:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable actress, appears to have been in only one thing. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 21:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Lots of OR and SYNTH, created by author of the "theory". No independent references (those that are not by Gavrilov were published even before this "theory" was formulated. No indicatiàon of meeting WP:GNG, hence: delete. Randykitty ( talk) 20:21, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
are quite convincing. This article exists for a long time (since 2006), providing important information to the public, and it is a result of successful cooperation of many contributors, participating in this project. -- 128.135.235.49 ( talk) 15:20, 16 December 2014 (UTC) — 128.135.235.49 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Promotional article on publicist. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO, relies mainly on college/self-published articles totally insufficient for a BLP. Coretheapple ( talk) 17:33, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Coral Springs Center for the Arts. MBisanz talk 04:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Local museum with no evidence of notability, but prod removed on the absurd notion that "museums are notable", again without evidence. Created by the blocked sock of a disruptive user, but it's been edited too much to qualify for G5. Nyttend ( talk) 17:26, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
by Marcus, Jonathan. South Florida Sun-Sentinel [Fort Lauderdale, Fla] 20 May 2012: p.1. That article is all about the museum and its longtime Executive Director. It mentions that "the nonprofit museum, which is affiliated with the city, has developed a niche in South Florida's art scene. The museum's first annual budget was approximately $121,000 while this year it is about $500,000." I get 377 hits on exact string "Coral Springs Museum of Art" in a national newspapers database behind paywall, many being reviews of new exhibits. -- do ncr am 19:25, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment. In this edit, editor User:Jllm06 redirected the AFD topic article to another article. I just reverted that, pending resolution of this AFD, per technical AFD policy described in the AFD notice at the article. Jllm06's edit is helpful in pointing out that, prior to the February 2014 creation of this article, there was pre-existing coverage of the museum topic at a different article. It seems reasonable for the AFD to be concluded with "Merge/redirect" or just "Redirect", as there was not substantially different content created at the AFD topic (newer) article. -- do ncr am 21:42, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 06:13, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Local church with no evidence of notability, but prod removed because the only source ( a blog) thinks that it's important. Created by the blocked sock of a disruptive user, but it's been edited too much to qualify for G5. Nyttend ( talk) 17:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 21:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE Harsh (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 23:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Seams like non-notable group. No reliable independent sources to establish the wp:notability. Vanjagenije ( talk) 16:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Keurig. The strongest arguments against stand-alone retention are WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, and, assuming the article was genericized in its current form, WP:UNDUE. I picked Keurig as the merge target because a box must be filled in, but that's obviously not set in stone and content is free to be merged elsewhere as anyone feels is appropriate, with the consensus at the various destination(s) determining how much of that content to integrate, if any. slakr\ talk / 05:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Softlavender ( talk) 18:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR) ( non-admin closure) Rcsprinter123 (state) @ 21:32, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
This belongs to the Wikidictionary, not to the encyclopedia. Basically, this article is about Japanese word for solitude. Vanjagenije ( talk) 15:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Captain Sensible#Politics. czar ⨹ 22:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Barely meets any Wikipedia policy on notability, and as a political party, fails to have any significance or notability either 'in real life' or to satisfy Wiki policies. doktorb words deeds 09:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 23:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Unsourced article, no indications of notability Primefac ( talk) 17:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by Jimfbleak per WP:G11 and WP:G12. ( non-admin closure) Anupmehra - Let's talk! 11:18, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Possibly unremarkable person, unsourced article smileguy91 talk 17:48, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a G12 copyright violation. Mojo Hand ( talk) 05:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This entry does not meet WP:GNG. If anyone can find reliable sources it might be included at Bitcoin but I'm doubtful that there is anything significant out there. Tchaliburton ( talk) 17:46, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:23, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable individual. I believe the page to be autobiographical
WP:AUTOBIO
Periglio (
talk)
16:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The underlying issues of the AfD nomination are: (a) the article's being "autobiographical", and (b) Marco Tiggelaar's not being a notable person.
The subject of this article is Marco Tiggelaar; I am the writer of the article, but I am not Marco Tiggelaar. Therefore, the article is not autobiographical.
Let us review Wikipedia's definition of Notability:
For people, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" – that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded" within Wikipedia as a written account of that person's life. "Notable" in the sense of being "famous" or "popular" – although not irrelevant – is secondary.
The key phrase used by Wikipedia to define notability is "worthy of notice". "Worthy of notice", in turn is defined by any one of the following adjectival phrases:
Marco Tiggelaar is neither famous nor popular, especially if measured using the standards of the entertainment and music industries or the number of followers/"likes" in the social network industry. However, since fame or popularity are not the primary considerations for notability, the following arguments focus on "worthy of notice".
The arguments presented here in favor of Marco Tiggelaar and the article about him are documented in the websites cited as references in the article.
December 2011 exchange of public messages in the forum
(
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.zenloadbalancer.user/month=20111201)
First point: The depth of Marco Tiggelaar's technical questions addressed to the original developers of Zen Load Balancer and his confident offer of assistance based on his knowledge of the Linux/Unix operating systems. – Openly and unconditionally offering to assist a major software developer based on his confident knowledge of Linux/Unix in spite of his being "not much into" development makes him significant.
Second point: The way he describes a Microsoft product: "I really want to replace the dumb Microsoft load balancer as you might understand lol :)" – The fact that he has the guts to call the product of the world's most popular software company "dumb" without mincing words makes him at least unusual, if not interesting, although he may not necessarily be considered significant in this particular instance.
Are his being unusual, interesting and significant in this case enough to deserve attention and to be recorded? Perhaps not necessarily, if only this single case is considered. There are three more cases following.
WordPress plugin page
(
https://wordpress.org/plugins/key4ce-osticket-bridge/developers/)
Point: WordPress is currently the most popular content management system in the world. Part of its popularity is the availability of free themes and plugins from international contributors that help make designing websites painless. Marco Tiggelaar happens to be the author of a plugin called Key4ce osTicket Bridge which helps web developers using WordPress include a help desk system in their website projects. The plugin page of Key4ce osTicket Bridge in WordPress reports a star rating of 4.4 out of 5, and the recorded number of downloads of the plugin is 2,596. – For an individual like Marco Tiggelaar to have his work given prominence within the pages of a renowned site like WordPress, it is tantamount to WordPress unilaterally proclaiming his significance.
The download record may not have made him public sensation but it must have been interesting and significant from the point of view of 2,596 people who downloaded copies of the software into their computers; otherwise, they would simply have ignored it.
Aside from making him significant, his plugin contribution to WordPress also makes him interesting and unusual, especially after considering the fact that WordPress itself as well as the themes and plugins offered in its website are free to use by the world public.
Engagement with users in the support forums
(
http://www.websitepanel.net/members/m-tiggelaar/)
First Point: WebsitePanel is described as a multi-tenant, Enterprise hosting automation tool with support for private cloud servers. It enables hosting businesses to centralize the management of their hosting infrastructure and share resources across multiple customer accounts. It is a product appreciated only by a few customers (because they are a rare class): those who provide hosting services to ISPs and other networked organizations. – Any person, including Marco Tiggelaar, who chooses to devote one's time for the benefit of this product without direct compensation is unusual enough to deserve attention and is therefore notable.
Second Point: The owner of WebsitePanel considers Marco Tiggelaar's technical credentials significant enough to warrant membership in its web community and responsibility in moderating three support forums, namely: General Discussions, Core Modules, and Enterprise Modules. – To take on these responsibilities, again without pay, certainly gives him points not only as far as being significant is concerned, but also being interesting and unusual.
Third Point: Marco Tiggelaar who casually talks about "IIS management", "FTP service", "NAT address", "firewall", "MySQL", "MSSQL", "auditlog", "eventlog", "Enterprise solution", "Hosting plan", "Mailbox plan", "127.0.0.1:9002", "Scheduler conf", "Global space", and "Autodiscover" in the WebsitePanel support forums. – Only an unusual individual churns out technical jargon like these on a daily basis.
Non-technical people may not perceive Marco Tiggelaar's being significant, but his technically savvy audience in the support forums apparently do because they look up to him for opinions or answers to technical questions.
Developing and releasing a high-value product for free
(
https://virtualpf.com/about/virtualpf/)
Point: VirtualPF is a firewall service or appliance running entirely within a virtualized environment, providing the usual packet filtering and monitoring that a physical firewall provides. It is forked from a predecessor product called pfSense with the intention to make it available for free to users. Marco Tiggelaar himself, with the help of two associates, worked on this product and it is now available to the whole world -- free of charge.
Does this make Marco Tiggelaar significant? Interesting? Unusual enough to deserve attention and to merit or to be recorded?
Network users throughout the whole world, unconditionally and without discrimination, stand to benefit from the added dimension of network security that they get from VirtualPF, courtesy of Marco Tiggelaar. He deserves gratitude, and this makes him significant enough to deserve attention or to be recorded. This alone is sufficient to meet the definition of "worthy of notice".
The 100% virtualization support that VirtualPF provides makes the job of administrators of complex network infrastructures worldwide easier. This makes him interesting enough to deserve attention or to be recorded; and this, too, by itself is sufficient to meet the definition of "worthy of notice".
Virtual PF is a complex piece of software, and Marco Tiggelaar put in much time and effort (a given in the world of software development) to bring it out to its intended beneficiaries without thought of financial gain. Considering that most people do this kind of work only if there's big money in it, this makes him unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded. Standing alone, this argument is also sufficient to meet the definition of "worthy of notice".
Since Marco Tiggelaar is worthy of notice, the article written about him passes Wikipedia's standard of notability. Therefore the AfD nomination under consideration lacks merit and must be withdrawn. Kaguchi ( talk) 11:03, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Tragic but nothing not notable murder/crime. ...William 16:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 19:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
An undistinguished pornstar failing both WP:GNG and WP:PORNSTAR. Her only award was a scene-related one. She has made no unique contributions to porn, has never starred in any blockbusters, and is not in any Hall of Fame. She received some some minor, non-mainstream coverage in the Spanish media (A documentary called "Come to my Las Vegas, Baby" on Canal+) that is not widespread enough to fulfill the demands of WP:GNG. Redban ( talk) 15:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. WP:SK #1: Withdrawn nomination w/ all "keep" votes – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
100% of the article is unsourced material about a living person. Complying with WP:BLP essentially requires blanking the page, until someone takes enough of an interest to author a sourced article. CorporateM ( Talk) 15:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as copyvio. If someone independent of the subject is interested enough in him to write an independent article, we can judge the notability of that once it happens, but there doesn't seem to be any point in holding a full discussion over an article that's essentially just a straight copy of a web site. — David Eppstein ( talk) 02:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Tagged for notability for two years. A few quick searches reveal only brief mentions and nothing where Mr. Covello is the subject of a substantial work. CorporateM ( Talk) 15:10, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Just useless. Several identically sourced/formatted articles have recently been deleted at AfD, eg:
As I said then, what is the point of this, bearing in mind that the lead says "The appearance of a particular tribe as Rajput in the list does not in itself confirm that the tribe is Rajput or otherwise. Identity may change with time, and some groups in the list may no longer identify themselves as Rajput." Also bear in mind that the 1911 census was not reliable, being subject to the huge misunderstandings resultant from the influence of H. H. Risley and other scientific racists. It's basically just a transcription of a primary source. One past AfD was contested at WP:DRV but the outcome remained the same. Sitush ( talk) 17:07, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 04:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Not notable party, against GNG and other policies. Not a political party with any achievements of note, and with no lasting cultural significance. doktorb words deeds 09:09, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Today (U.S. TV program). If anyone wants to merge what little substantial content there is, they're free to do so. Mr. Z-man 21:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Little references and most of the article is one section (Matt's Travel Locations). Little evidence of WP:NOTABILITY, it's just a segment on the Today show. StewdioMACK ( talk) 08:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep it!! just because you don't like it dose not meen you can delete it Jena ( talk) 14:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:43, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
An uncelebrated pornstar, she fails WP:PORNSTAR with the absence of any major / substantial industry awards and no widespread coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. She has a Hall of Fame induction for "Urban X," but this achievement is not "equivalent" to the AVN or XRCO Hall of Fame, as required by WP:PORNSTAR (3). The Urban X Hall of Fame is new, and it lacks obvious Hall of Famers (ie - Serenity, Mark Davis, Jenna Jameson), which makes me consider it insignificant. Urban X gives its awards through fan-voting, so their Hall of Fame criteria is likely flimsy. Redban ( talk) 08:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitten (pornographic actress)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora Jolie
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devlin Weed
Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_January_24#Carmen Hayes
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cherokee_D'Ass_(3rd_nomination)
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kaiya_Lynn
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Victory (2nd nomination)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirra Lynne
I know of no discussions resulting in a keep (under the current "well-known and significant" standard, which by consensus was made more restrictive than mere notability). If Scott Boras were to create a "hall of fame" for collegiate baseball players, and most of the members turned out to be young players he represented, there would be little argument that the "award" didn't demonstrate notability. One person's actions don't create an "industry award"; one person giving trophies out that primarily promote her husband's business interests is clearly not significant. Note that the only sources related to to this award, both in this article and the award article, are Urban X's own announcements. Clear GNG failure, no other plausible claim to notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 15:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 21:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Uncelebrated pornstar who fails WP:Pornbio, as the rules clearly exempt awards for scenes. She also has not starred in any blockblusters or made any unique contributions to porn. She has no substantial coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Redban ( talk) 08:29, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 21:33, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
This topic about a liqueur does not meet WP:GNG. Several source searches are not providing significant coverage in reliable sources. Prod was declined and the deprodder added a primary source, but this does not establish notability. NorthAmerica 1000 08:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 21:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Many binary international relations are notable, but this is a mere notice of the establishment of relations between an micro-nation and a major country with whom it has no substantial connection. Neither has a resident ambassador or even consulate with the other, DGG ( talk ) 08:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete as the article was created by a sockpuppet of User:Holy Child Student and hasn't received significant contributions from other editors. @ DGG: @ LibStar: this person keeps coming back, so could you please let me know if you see similar articles? They don't seem to understand that it takes me seconds to delete what must be taking them quite a while to add... Nick-D ( talk) 23:07, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Many binary international relations are notable, but this is a mere notice of the establishment of relations between an micro-nation and a country on the other side of the world. DGG ( talk ) 08:00, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mr. Z-man 21:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:25, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
insufficient evidence of notability. Almost all sources are published by the company or press releases DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete & redirect to Sissel Kyrkjebø discography. czar ⨹ 21:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Looks like a random collection of songs. Although the songs may be notable, the collection probably isn't. All references are {{ bsr}} and it is unclear how the sources have been used for compiling the article. Stefan2 ( talk) 14:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). Note that this close does not preclude a potential merge of the article. NorthAmerica 1000 21:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Short article on a proposed referendum that never happened. Article ends with speculation that it may happen in future, but this is WP:CRYSTAL and the article can easily be restored if it is given the go ahead. Current content (the issue was about changing the electoral system) could easily be covered in Elections in Bulgaria or National Assembly (Bulgaria) in one or two sentences. Number 5 7 13:06, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 23:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Based on results of recent AfD nominations of articles on my watchlist, I am renominating this article for deletion on the rationale of WP:PROMO. Article was created by WP:SPA editor who may have a commercial (or academic) conflict of interest in relation to the edits in the article edit history. I read sources on this topic extensively, and the product is not described in such approving terms as in the article by anyone but its developers in the professional literature. [19] [20] WeijiBaikeBianji ( talk, how I edit) 02:15, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar ⨹ 21:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominating for DELETION as fails NOTABILITY. There does seem to have been some local notability as the references come from periodicals/newspapers local to the north-east of England and the software did make no. 86 on a list of free software in PC mag but there are no references to be found on Google Books or Scholar. The external software page does not exist anymore. The firm seems never to have been more than a 2-person firm. In fairness to the article, it's not that spammy compared with some of the other stuff out there, but I don't believe it merits a page. U2fanboi ( talk) 13:58, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar ⨹ 21:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
I can find no coverage of this skateboarding game and no indication the subject meets the General notability guideline. The sources cited in the article are a blog and an online skateboarding dictionary. This article appears to be the only relevant Ghit. Even the basketball game H-O-R-S-E, on which this game appears to be modelled, has only a section dedicated to it in the article Variations of basketball; based on the lack of coverage, I don't think this subject merits a standalone article. -- Rrburke ( talk) 15:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Dea
db
eef
15:47, 12 December 2014 (UTC)The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 18:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Listcruft. Per WP:LISTN has not been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources. Per WP:STAND has no lead; and indeed no sources that are used to show NOTABILITY of group. each person in list has their own source with none repeated Jytdog ( talk) 04:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Jytdog started this request for deletion when people who did not have good outcomes from ECT were added and today continues to edit the article in favor of his point of view by removing the description "psychiatric survivor" and "elecroshock survivor". https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_people_who_have_undergone_electroconvulsive_therapy&diff=637908569&oldid=637906735 -- Mark v1.0 ( talk) 20:47, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per CSD F9 as unambiguous copyright infringement. No source is provided for the file, and it appears to have been copied from somewhere. As such, the licensing information on the file page under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version and Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License is incorrect, in which the uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder of this work of the image, which is virtually certain to be false. Furthermore, the written content of the page was in an incorrect namespace, is mostly duplicated at User:BHUMIJ LANGUAGE/sandbox, and an article already exists at Bhumij. NorthAmerica 1000 04:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Article created in file namespace which is likely not to meet notability standards. Stifle ( talk) 09:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Effectively unsourced promo article, crystal bol, doubtful notability The Banner talk 13:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was merge to Ion Bazac. czar ⨹ 21:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
The article relates to a proposed Formula One team that was planned for the 2015 Formula One season. However, the entry list for the 2015 season has been published without mention of the team, and the question of whether or not the team ever existed beyond paper cannot be verified. Although there are articles for teams that never existed, such as USF1 Team, in this case there is no physical evidence that Forza Rossa existed at all. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 03:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Milk Queen. czar ⨹ 21:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Unremarkable beauty pageant Gbawden ( talk) 14:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
Redirect to Milk Queen, without prejudice in the event that someone wants to spend the time sourcing this. There are indeed old news articles from back in the day, and I found use of the term in novels, non-fiction and essays as a kind of placeholder for a certain kind of authentic, rural America. A solid, reliably sourced article could be written, but until/unless it is, WP readers are better served by a redirect to Milk Queen. And now let's get serious, Would you like Maple Walnut or Rocky Road? ShulMaven ( talk) 20:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 20:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
I can't find references that show this to be notable in any way. Fails WP:GNG. Tchaliburton ( talk) 03:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). NorthAmerica 1000 21:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
The article fails WP:GNG. The record label has not been discussed in reliable sources. The only artist signed to the label is Patoranking. Per WP:INHERITORG, a record label cannot inherit notability from the artists they're associated with. Versace1608 (Talk) 05:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 08:11, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Hoax? I can't find anything at all to confirm this. Neither this nor this nor (most clearly) this give any useful results. There is a "Golden Ball" at the end of the Asian Cup [24], but that is something different than what is described here (different set of players, not annual, ...). Fram ( talk) 08:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
No it's not a hoax. For now, most of the news of this award can only be found on Chinese websites, but this award is existed. The 24 journalists are come from almost all AFC countries, and three European journalists from L'Equipe, La Gazzetta Dello Sport and Goal.com, only one of them is Chinese journalist, so I think this award is credible. And here is the news about Honda accepted this award in San Siro on Mar 16th, 2014 (Photo provided): http://soccer.titan24.com/2014-03-17/251224.html. And here the news about Son won the award in 2014 and journalists' comments on players: http://cnsoccer.titan24.com/2014-11-28/327188.html. Cirolchou ( talk) 09:28, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete as unsourced BLP. If sources have been found, the article may be recreated.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a television personality, relying almost entirely on primary sources with only a single linkrotted bare URL to indicate that anything here was ever properly verifiable in a reliable source. She might certainly qualify for a Wikipedia article if one can be written that cites proper reliable source coverage, but simply existing is not a notability freebie if the sourcing isn't there. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 03:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable musician fails WP:MUSICBIO Philg88 ♦ talk 09:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.[note 6] This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses.
Drasar Monumental is half of a duo with MF Grimm, who is a prominent hip hop artist and comic book writer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Swann ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:27, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Not a notable academic. He may in retirement head a department of a somewhat obscure, caste-ist educational institution and he may have written/translated quite extensively but neither qualifies him for an article on Wikipedia. Sitush ( talk) 09:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. NorthAmerica 1000 00:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
A hardly notable periodical made by George Richards and Camilla Hall, two students at the University of Edinburgh. Most edits are made by User:Gergis, who tried to improve notability by editing other articles (like this one). Meanwhile the 'journal' is no more than a weblog. No links to external sources, and I could not find a reference to the at the University of Edinburgh's website. Jeff5102 ( talk) 13:04, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of TV5 TV and radio stations-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:49, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable & unverifiable subject; no reliable sources that can establish its notability. Theenjay36 ( talk) 01:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
What we have here is a list of people who are mostly non-notable. As a collective they are no more notable. I think it could make sense to list notable players (like scoring leaders or MVPs) on the main 2014 World Junior A Challenge page, but there's no value in listing the entire roster of each team. Tchaliburton ( talk) 01:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)