< 28 October | 30 October > |
---|
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. All I can find by searching is promotional material sourced from the company, and trivial passing mentions. Nothing substantial, independent and in a Reliable source. Hence, while some of the individual (secondary) schools may merit their own article, the company which owns them fails our notability standards. dramatic ( talk) 01:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge and redirect the articles to an appropriate character list (at this time, probably the character list, as that seems headed toward a keep result). Whether and what to merge from each article is, as always, an editorial decision. History will be left intact as there does appear to be strong support for merging of some material. Note that the articles noted later in the discussion were not tagged as being part of it, and so have not been redirected, although of course this can be done if desired. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Fictional characters for which there are no reliable sources to support notability. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:58, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are individual characters from the same series, again with no reliable sources:
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any non-trivial, reliable sources independent of the subject in order to sufficiently establish the notability of the contested prod. This is a long-standing unreferenced BLP that does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:ANYBIO. J04n( talk page) 23:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:WEB and WP:V: non-notable browser game with no references based on reliable, published sources. Wyatt Riot ( talk) 23:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This appears to fail WP:NTENNIS. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 23:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Per WP:MADEUP. I can't find any evidence of this concept, given that it is different to Presidency at the Eucharist. St Anselm ( talk) 22:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This school district only became briefly notable for the single event of the existence on the board of one Clint McCance who became notorious for homophobic remarks on Facebook, and who has been pressured into resigning.. Otherwise it is a non notable school district like all the others Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 21:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Delete the lot Courcelles 00:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Trivial level from a computer game. QU TalkQu 21:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article appears to have no context nor is this a person of importance or any significance. Perhaps a short blurb regarding University of Penn Athletics, but this is not worthy of a dedicated page/article.
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was delete. Mkativerata ( talk) 20:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Neologism, Prod removed by author. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 21:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:20, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:29, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is about a series of unrelated events that happen across America, that happen to have the same name. If the events were related beyond sharing a punny name and being a celebration of Independence Day (had the same organizers, sponsors, etc.) I would think they are plenty notable - but most of it reads like a disambiguation page - and while sources exist that mention Red, White and Boom (none that are listed in this article...) the fact that they are not really talking about the same event limits their effectiveness. Addionne ( talk) 19:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This is not true, Straus is a lightweight fighter, and no where in the article is there a reference to him being a "light heavyweight." Also, he is not a featherweight, and to my knowledge he has never fought as featherweight. His last fight, which I witnessed first hand, he fought Karen Darabedyan it a lightweight fight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gc 424 ( talk • contribs) 07:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Probably fails WP:MMANOT. Has no sources. Worst of all, it contains many factual errors. He's a featherweight, not a light heavyweight. Paralympiakos (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that there is insufficient coverage to establish notability. Davewild ( talk) 12:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local amusement park that does not appear to meet WP:CORP; seeing as how it is a business, this would seem to be the most logical notability criterion. Barring that, there isn't enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Some information can be found in local newspapers, but all of the content found is of the "it exists" ilk without any sort of non-trivial coverage from WP:RS. PROD contested with the edit summary unnecessary for a beloved park, which does nothing to address the notability concerns. Kinu t/ c 18:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Hoax? Can't find any sources for it. Seems very unlikely. TalkToMe c intelati 18:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of Doctor Who supporting characters. Courcelles 00:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
There doesn't seem to be enough reliable independent sources for this character to have an article. Yes, she was a recurring character, but essentially she was just Donna Noble's mum. She did nothing more. Harry Blue5 ( talk) 18:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus among uninvolved editors seems to be that the coverage provided constitute passing mentions rather than significant coverage, as required by the relevant notability guideline. ~ mazca talk 00:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Weak notability, at best, spammy. PROD'ed but IP editor with edits to no other article removed nom and issue tags. TRANSPORTERMAN ( TALK) 17:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. (once again, only one !vote each) In addition, see
http://www.marketinglegal.com.br/mkt/files/20070419_ARK_China_Conference_2007.pdf and
http://www.shb.com/newsevents/2009/UnitedStatesChapter.pdf and
http://blog.dacare-group.com/index.php/all?blog=1&cat=25&page=1&paged=8 and
http://www.legal500.com/firms/30085/offices/31883 and
http://www.glgroup.com/Council-Member/Matthew-Murphy-73188.html —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.215.211.173 (
talk) 23:55, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Also see
http://www.amazon.com/Practices-International-Business-Transactions-China/dp/0314199403 and
http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/pdfs/general/IP%20_contacts_China.pdf and
http://www.jurispub.com/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=7936 and
http://www.chinalawandpractice.com/SearchResults.aspx?Keywords=office%2Bopening&PageMove=0 and
http://www.sha.britcham.org/sh/events/details1.php?id=416 and
http://www.itechlaw.org/vegas2008/mmurphy.html and
http://www.c5-online.com/regulatory_compliance/ChinaImport/agenda.htm and
http://www.c5-online.com/regulatory_compliance/ChinaImport/agenda.htm and
http://www.itechlaw.org/boston2010/itl_boston_brochure_web.pdf and www.cafte.gov.cn/other/20041229/.../P020030910428107031247.xls and
http://www.chinastudies.unimelb.edu.au/conferences/2009/assets/pdf/China-Conference-Abstracts.pdf and
http://www.dgri.de/dateien/anhaenge/akt_070703_programm.pdf and
http://global.korcham.net/File/International/Board01/기업정책이슈3_주요국가의경쟁정책동향과대응방안.pdf —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.215.211.173 (
talk) 00:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Also see
http://www.strategy-business.com/media/file/leading_ideas-20070703.pdf and
http://guadua.org/news/tags/Australia and
http://www.internationallawoffice.com/NewsArchive/Detail.aspx?g=1bc7b417-2f61-4ed6-9d6a-a4c9e3d927ee and
http://asia.legalbusinessonline.com/news/breaking-news/prc-law-firm-opens-australian-office/29963 and
http://hetii.com/cn/library/news_info_view.asp?news_id=394 and
http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/default.asp?Page=12&OB=D&Catalog=ITR&DatePeriod=0&SearchStr=MMLC&x=7&y=9 and
http://www.ibls.es/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&id=2192 and
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/1ddfcaa20029bd64783e2c08.html and www.bullivant.com/getFile.aspx?file=6225 and
http://www.acc.com/chapters/china/legalresources.cfm .... there are literally hundreds of references to this firm online, from hundreds of independent objective sources. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.215.211.173 (
talk)
02:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was redirect to California state elections, November 2010
essay, totally non encyclopedic Wuh Wuz Dat 17:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Could not find any reliable, independent publications to verify this material. By extension does not pass notability guidelines. ( WP:V, WP:N). Marasmusine ( talk) 16:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 no assertion of importance or significance JohnCD ( talk) 21:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Was previously prodded as "Seems a non-notable company, see WP:CORP, WP:GNG" and endorsed. Author removed prod, yet no references were provided, and notability still questionable. Hasteur ( talk) 15:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. One of ten candidates for governor of Michigan who ran on the U.S. Taxpayer's Party. Did not make it past the primary election. This article presents her personal and religious background, as well as her platform and stand on the issues of the failed campaign. Lacks notability outside of being an unsuccessful candidate for governor, represented by a fringe political party. Lacks significant coverage presented in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Cindamuse ( talk) 14:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete article reads like a campaign ad and it's redundant since she failed to be elected. Fails both WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Valenciano ( talk) 16:48, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. Biographies of 3rd party candidates can offer ideas that the major party candidates don't have. Although not elected, she has made some mark on Michigan History, and this article records a piece of it, through the fact she is a Michiganian. Igo4U
Delete. This is WP:SPAM for a person who fails WP:POLITICIAN. Qworty ( talk) 02:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Raelian itself is a redirect with no competing usages; therefore there is nothing to disambiguate, and none of the terms supposedly handled in this article contain the word. Mangoe ( talk) 14:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn. I really just hoped someone would find some decent refs. done. — Timneu22 · talk 14:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Zero sources provided, hard to determine any claims that he was relevant based on google searches. Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought more people should have a look. — Timneu22 · talk 13:53, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Apparent autobiogrpahy de-proded by creator. Notability is asserted by claims such as "famous in the Arab and Muslim worlds, and known as the father of Islamic banking" but the sources provided are a the author's Wordpress blog (from which much of the content is copied verbatim) and this, which I can't read but is from appears to only be an article written by the subject for a site of undetermined notability. The "father of Islamic banking" claim seems dubious given that the subject is about 30 and Islamic banking is, while still young, definitely older. Searching for other sources comes up empty. This article fails WP:BIO. — Scien tizzle 13:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Sporting achievements appear to fail WP:NSPORTS, but more importantly all the coverage seems to be about his arrest/trial for an assault/manslaughter. Therefore I think it's important that the community have an opportunity to verify if this is a WP:BLP1E problem. Bigger digger ( talk) 13:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This song did not chart in any country, noted here. The only notability it offers is the song's use in a commercial and a video game. Also, the reference given does not mention this song. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 09:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Neither of the two songs on this release charted in any country (shown here). A similar discussion is here D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 22:08, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article seems as someones fantasy and there are no sources added. ( WP:Sources) Vinie007 ( talk) 12:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Khleo Thomas. Ged UK 09:24, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Founded in 2010, hasn't released anything major yet; creator states on talkpage s/he's trying to promote the founder. Google-hits are difficult to sort out as the name is used by other companies as well. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 12:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a game guide: "This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, game guides...". Colonel Warden ( talk) 11:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
(UTC)
The result was The result was Keep - Nomination withdrawn ( WP:NAC)-- kelapstick( bainuu) 02:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Declined prod, non notable politician, the article is largely a list of elections the subject did not win. -- Nuujinn ( talk) 11:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 07:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Entirely inappropriate as an article and would be inappropriate in userspace under WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Strange Passerby ( talk • contribs) 11:18, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I think it's possible, that the article is a fake. The father Dennis is not a son of Ernest Augustus, Prince of Hanover (1914–1987). In this case this article is Wikipedia:Vandalism and author should be blocked. -- Pitlane02 ( talk) 10:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Apparently withdrawn by nom, also WP:SNOW. j⚛e decker talk 17:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Does not seem to be an article at all, as such. It is completely without context and these issues have been highlighted by others. Article creator simply repeats 'no consensus' and gives other seemingly meaningless edit summaries. If anyone wants to randomly push buttons without a scooby what they're doing, they would be much better off here < http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/news/radiophonatron.shtml>. Mannafredo ( talk) 07:51, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 07:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The page is total nonsense and is a complete falsification that is very provocative for the REAL artist Casino Steel. www.casinosteel.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kweenqueen ( talk • contribs)
The result was keep. But with no prejudice to the various ideas for improvement such as moving, etc, which can be discussed elsewhere. There is consensus that the redlinks should be removed from non-notable clubs which is a normal editing move. Davewild ( talk) 12:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
as per WP:NOTDIR. almost all list entries are non notable. also nominating similar articles:
LibStar ( talk) 05:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Has previously been deleted at more than one AfD, primarily because of WP:CRYSTAL concerns (it has never been released, despite claiming for years that it was about to be). I had planned to speedy it, but a number of editors protested, so I've brought it here instead. Jayjg (talk) 05:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was The article has been speedily deleted as a hoax, and its author indefinitely blocked as a vandalism only account. JamesBWatson ( talk) 08:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Another false media article by ClapBoy380 (a constant originator of articles which have been hauled off to AfD lately), which on the surface seems to be a fine article but once you read it, you realize that Vanessa Hudgens has never been to prison for pot possession (much less while she was filming the HSM movies), is not an Island Def Jam artist, nor are any of the artists mentioned elswhere in the article Island Def Jam artists, along with a clearly MS Paint'ed album cover. And when you get to the bottom, no sources. Article creator has been warned multiple times not to create these false articles and this is their most elaborate farce yet. Nate • ( chatter) 05:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Ian Keaggy is not notable simply because his father is. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:29, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC NW ( Talk) 03:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete as a poorly sourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable author lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. ttonyb ( talk) 01:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was IAR Speedy Procedural Close: Another AfD is taking place at the same time. Sven Manguard Talk 02:32, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Possible WP:HOAX. Despite claims of importance, this is the single longest uncited BLP on Wikipedia, and when I looked for citations I found... nothing. Wikipedia seems to be the only place that mentions him. There's a teenager with a facebook page, and a few sites for a buisnessman who did a web interview, but nothing on a politician or Christian leader. Zero news hits, image hits do not show any individual consistently, in other words, I can find nothing to prove he exists. Sven Manguard Talk 02:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Procedural close: When I AfD'ed this, it popped up that someone AfD'ed it yesterday, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill van Rij.
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
WP:OR I don't know that "spiritual" is a typical genre of film like horror or romantic comedy, but it if is, then a properly-sourced article with links that satisfy guidelines should be written. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG. no references and no coverage in gnews [16]. LibStar ( talk) 04:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. The references are not yet strong, but it has a reasonable history and it could be improved. -- Bduke (Discussion) 00:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Umeå#Culture. ( non-admin closure) ⅊ ™ 00:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:GNG. uncited and possibly original research. hardly anything in gnews [17]. LibStar ( talk) 03:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I can't find any significant coverage for this comic company. Joe Chill ( talk) 23:39, 13 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep under WP:SK ground 1. NAC— S Marshall T/ C 01:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD from July 2009! No evidence this footballer meets WP:ATHLETE or WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 00:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band of unstable membership, no albums or at least singles released, doesn't even have its own website. Incarnatus ( talk) 18:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
I got one WP:RS between Gnews and regular Google search,not convinced he meets WP:GNG The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 04:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Thinking Pictures. Ged UK 09:45, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Co-founder of Thinking Pictures. No evidence he satisfies N. Source 1 is his own website. Source 2 are passing mentions. Source 3 is better, an article on some of his work, but little info on Fitch himself, and not enough to build any sort of article. I redirected this to Thinking Pictures but the article creator overturned this. Christopher Connor ( talk) 22:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non- notable entertainer. As an actor, Wayne has a few minor credits (single episode background roles). As a producer, he has produced a one-man show of another non-notable actor. As a magician, there does not appear to be any indication of notability at all. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 15:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
No reliable sources, official website says launch delayed to 2012, Wikipedia being used for promotional purposes to attract investors. Brief mention is already in United States Football League. Recreate with reliable sources if the league ever does launch. Prior AfD had very weak keep support for 2011 launch only. — UncleDouggie ( talk) 03:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 09:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This song didn't chart anywhere, as seen here. A similar discussion is here. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Disputed prod. Non-notable band. Fails WP:MUSIC. DJSasso ( talk) 15:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 21:09, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ged UK 09:16, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable artist, fails WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. Grsz 11 21:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Is not a notable person (see: Wikipedia:Notability) and in my opinion is little more than a vanity article. Exiledone ( talk) 22:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable failed mall. Stonemason89 ( talk) 22:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
< 28 October | 30 October > |
---|
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. All I can find by searching is promotional material sourced from the company, and trivial passing mentions. Nothing substantial, independent and in a Reliable source. Hence, while some of the individual (secondary) schools may merit their own article, the company which owns them fails our notability standards. dramatic ( talk) 01:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge and redirect the articles to an appropriate character list (at this time, probably the character list, as that seems headed toward a keep result). Whether and what to merge from each article is, as always, an editorial decision. History will be left intact as there does appear to be strong support for merging of some material. Note that the articles noted later in the discussion were not tagged as being part of it, and so have not been redirected, although of course this can be done if desired. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Fictional characters for which there are no reliable sources to support notability. VernoWhitney ( talk) 23:58, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are individual characters from the same series, again with no reliable sources:
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Unable to find any non-trivial, reliable sources independent of the subject in order to sufficiently establish the notability of the contested prod. This is a long-standing unreferenced BLP that does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:ANYBIO. J04n( talk page) 23:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:WEB and WP:V: non-notable browser game with no references based on reliable, published sources. Wyatt Riot ( talk) 23:46, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This appears to fail WP:NTENNIS. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 23:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Per WP:MADEUP. I can't find any evidence of this concept, given that it is different to Presidency at the Eucharist. St Anselm ( talk) 22:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This school district only became briefly notable for the single event of the existence on the board of one Clint McCance who became notorious for homophobic remarks on Facebook, and who has been pressured into resigning.. Otherwise it is a non notable school district like all the others Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 21:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Delete the lot Courcelles 00:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Trivial level from a computer game. QU TalkQu 21:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article appears to have no context nor is this a person of importance or any significance. Perhaps a short blurb regarding University of Penn Athletics, but this is not worthy of a dedicated page/article.
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was delete. Mkativerata ( talk) 20:58, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Neologism, Prod removed by author. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 21:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:24, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:20, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:29, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:28, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close. Larger AfD discussion about related articles by the same editor is taking place here. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Non-notable video game level. Dac04 ( talk) 20:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is about a series of unrelated events that happen across America, that happen to have the same name. If the events were related beyond sharing a punny name and being a celebration of Independence Day (had the same organizers, sponsors, etc.) I would think they are plenty notable - but most of it reads like a disambiguation page - and while sources exist that mention Red, White and Boom (none that are listed in this article...) the fact that they are not really talking about the same event limits their effectiveness. Addionne ( talk) 19:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This is not true, Straus is a lightweight fighter, and no where in the article is there a reference to him being a "light heavyweight." Also, he is not a featherweight, and to my knowledge he has never fought as featherweight. His last fight, which I witnessed first hand, he fought Karen Darabedyan it a lightweight fight. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gc 424 ( talk • contribs) 07:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Probably fails WP:MMANOT. Has no sources. Worst of all, it contains many factual errors. He's a featherweight, not a light heavyweight. Paralympiakos (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus is that there is insufficient coverage to establish notability. Davewild ( talk) 12:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local amusement park that does not appear to meet WP:CORP; seeing as how it is a business, this would seem to be the most logical notability criterion. Barring that, there isn't enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Some information can be found in local newspapers, but all of the content found is of the "it exists" ilk without any sort of non-trivial coverage from WP:RS. PROD contested with the edit summary unnecessary for a beloved park, which does nothing to address the notability concerns. Kinu t/ c 18:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Hoax? Can't find any sources for it. Seems very unlikely. TalkToMe c intelati 18:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of Doctor Who supporting characters. Courcelles 00:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
There doesn't seem to be enough reliable independent sources for this character to have an article. Yes, she was a recurring character, but essentially she was just Donna Noble's mum. She did nothing more. Harry Blue5 ( talk) 18:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus among uninvolved editors seems to be that the coverage provided constitute passing mentions rather than significant coverage, as required by the relevant notability guideline. ~ mazca talk 00:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Weak notability, at best, spammy. PROD'ed but IP editor with edits to no other article removed nom and issue tags. TRANSPORTERMAN ( TALK) 17:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. (once again, only one !vote each) In addition, see
http://www.marketinglegal.com.br/mkt/files/20070419_ARK_China_Conference_2007.pdf and
http://www.shb.com/newsevents/2009/UnitedStatesChapter.pdf and
http://blog.dacare-group.com/index.php/all?blog=1&cat=25&page=1&paged=8 and
http://www.legal500.com/firms/30085/offices/31883 and
http://www.glgroup.com/Council-Member/Matthew-Murphy-73188.html —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.215.211.173 (
talk) 23:55, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Also see
http://www.amazon.com/Practices-International-Business-Transactions-China/dp/0314199403 and
http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/pdfs/general/IP%20_contacts_China.pdf and
http://www.jurispub.com/cart.php?m=product_detail&p=7936 and
http://www.chinalawandpractice.com/SearchResults.aspx?Keywords=office%2Bopening&PageMove=0 and
http://www.sha.britcham.org/sh/events/details1.php?id=416 and
http://www.itechlaw.org/vegas2008/mmurphy.html and
http://www.c5-online.com/regulatory_compliance/ChinaImport/agenda.htm and
http://www.c5-online.com/regulatory_compliance/ChinaImport/agenda.htm and
http://www.itechlaw.org/boston2010/itl_boston_brochure_web.pdf and www.cafte.gov.cn/other/20041229/.../P020030910428107031247.xls and
http://www.chinastudies.unimelb.edu.au/conferences/2009/assets/pdf/China-Conference-Abstracts.pdf and
http://www.dgri.de/dateien/anhaenge/akt_070703_programm.pdf and
http://global.korcham.net/File/International/Board01/기업정책이슈3_주요국가의경쟁정책동향과대응방안.pdf —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.215.211.173 (
talk) 00:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Also see
http://www.strategy-business.com/media/file/leading_ideas-20070703.pdf and
http://guadua.org/news/tags/Australia and
http://www.internationallawoffice.com/NewsArchive/Detail.aspx?g=1bc7b417-2f61-4ed6-9d6a-a4c9e3d927ee and
http://asia.legalbusinessonline.com/news/breaking-news/prc-law-firm-opens-australian-office/29963 and
http://hetii.com/cn/library/news_info_view.asp?news_id=394 and
http://www.internationaltaxreview.com/default.asp?Page=12&OB=D&Catalog=ITR&DatePeriod=0&SearchStr=MMLC&x=7&y=9 and
http://www.ibls.es/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&id=2192 and
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/1ddfcaa20029bd64783e2c08.html and www.bullivant.com/getFile.aspx?file=6225 and
http://www.acc.com/chapters/china/legalresources.cfm .... there are literally hundreds of references to this firm online, from hundreds of independent objective sources. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.215.211.173 (
talk)
02:25, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was redirect to California state elections, November 2010
essay, totally non encyclopedic Wuh Wuz Dat 17:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Could not find any reliable, independent publications to verify this material. By extension does not pass notability guidelines. ( WP:V, WP:N). Marasmusine ( talk) 16:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7 no assertion of importance or significance JohnCD ( talk) 21:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Was previously prodded as "Seems a non-notable company, see WP:CORP, WP:GNG" and endorsed. Author removed prod, yet no references were provided, and notability still questionable. Hasteur ( talk) 15:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. One of ten candidates for governor of Michigan who ran on the U.S. Taxpayer's Party. Did not make it past the primary election. This article presents her personal and religious background, as well as her platform and stand on the issues of the failed campaign. Lacks notability outside of being an unsuccessful candidate for governor, represented by a fringe political party. Lacks significant coverage presented in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Cindamuse ( talk) 14:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete article reads like a campaign ad and it's redundant since she failed to be elected. Fails both WP:POLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Valenciano ( talk) 16:48, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. Biographies of 3rd party candidates can offer ideas that the major party candidates don't have. Although not elected, she has made some mark on Michigan History, and this article records a piece of it, through the fact she is a Michiganian. Igo4U
Delete. This is WP:SPAM for a person who fails WP:POLITICIAN. Qworty ( talk) 02:29, 4 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Raelian itself is a redirect with no competing usages; therefore there is nothing to disambiguate, and none of the terms supposedly handled in this article contain the word. Mangoe ( talk) 14:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn. I really just hoped someone would find some decent refs. done. — Timneu22 · talk 14:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Zero sources provided, hard to determine any claims that he was relevant based on google searches. Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought more people should have a look. — Timneu22 · talk 13:53, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Apparent autobiogrpahy de-proded by creator. Notability is asserted by claims such as "famous in the Arab and Muslim worlds, and known as the father of Islamic banking" but the sources provided are a the author's Wordpress blog (from which much of the content is copied verbatim) and this, which I can't read but is from appears to only be an article written by the subject for a site of undetermined notability. The "father of Islamic banking" claim seems dubious given that the subject is about 30 and Islamic banking is, while still young, definitely older. Searching for other sources comes up empty. This article fails WP:BIO. — Scien tizzle 13:50, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Sporting achievements appear to fail WP:NSPORTS, but more importantly all the coverage seems to be about his arrest/trial for an assault/manslaughter. Therefore I think it's important that the community have an opportunity to verify if this is a WP:BLP1E problem. Bigger digger ( talk) 13:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This song did not chart in any country, noted here. The only notability it offers is the song's use in a commercial and a video game. Also, the reference given does not mention this song. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 09:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Neither of the two songs on this release charted in any country (shown here). A similar discussion is here D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 22:08, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This article seems as someones fantasy and there are no sources added. ( WP:Sources) Vinie007 ( talk) 12:30, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Khleo Thomas. Ged UK 09:24, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Founded in 2010, hasn't released anything major yet; creator states on talkpage s/he's trying to promote the founder. Google-hits are difficult to sort out as the name is used by other companies as well. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 12:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a game guide: "This includes tutorials, walk-throughs, instruction manuals, game guides...". Colonel Warden ( talk) 11:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
(UTC)
The result was The result was Keep - Nomination withdrawn ( WP:NAC)-- kelapstick( bainuu) 02:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Declined prod, non notable politician, the article is largely a list of elections the subject did not win. -- Nuujinn ( talk) 11:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 07:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Entirely inappropriate as an article and would be inappropriate in userspace under WP:NOTSOAPBOX. Strange Passerby ( talk • contribs) 11:18, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I think it's possible, that the article is a fake. The father Dennis is not a son of Ernest Augustus, Prince of Hanover (1914–1987). In this case this article is Wikipedia:Vandalism and author should be blocked. -- Pitlane02 ( talk) 10:40, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Apparently withdrawn by nom, also WP:SNOW. j⚛e decker talk 17:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Does not seem to be an article at all, as such. It is completely without context and these issues have been highlighted by others. Article creator simply repeats 'no consensus' and gives other seemingly meaningless edit summaries. If anyone wants to randomly push buttons without a scooby what they're doing, they would be much better off here < http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/news/radiophonatron.shtml>. Mannafredo ( talk) 07:51, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 07:49, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
The page is total nonsense and is a complete falsification that is very provocative for the REAL artist Casino Steel. www.casinosteel.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kweenqueen ( talk • contribs)
The result was keep. But with no prejudice to the various ideas for improvement such as moving, etc, which can be discussed elsewhere. There is consensus that the redlinks should be removed from non-notable clubs which is a normal editing move. Davewild ( talk) 12:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply
as per WP:NOTDIR. almost all list entries are non notable. also nominating similar articles:
LibStar ( talk) 05:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Peter Karlsen ( talk) 01:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Has previously been deleted at more than one AfD, primarily because of WP:CRYSTAL concerns (it has never been released, despite claiming for years that it was about to be). I had planned to speedy it, but a number of editors protested, so I've brought it here instead. Jayjg (talk) 05:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was The article has been speedily deleted as a hoax, and its author indefinitely blocked as a vandalism only account. JamesBWatson ( talk) 08:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Another false media article by ClapBoy380 (a constant originator of articles which have been hauled off to AfD lately), which on the surface seems to be a fine article but once you read it, you realize that Vanessa Hudgens has never been to prison for pot possession (much less while she was filming the HSM movies), is not an Island Def Jam artist, nor are any of the artists mentioned elswhere in the article Island Def Jam artists, along with a clearly MS Paint'ed album cover. And when you get to the bottom, no sources. Article creator has been warned multiple times not to create these false articles and this is their most elaborate farce yet. Nate • ( chatter) 05:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Ian Keaggy is not notable simply because his father is. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:29, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC NW ( Talk) 03:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete as a poorly sourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable author lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. ttonyb ( talk) 01:18, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was IAR Speedy Procedural Close: Another AfD is taking place at the same time. Sven Manguard Talk 02:32, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Possible WP:HOAX. Despite claims of importance, this is the single longest uncited BLP on Wikipedia, and when I looked for citations I found... nothing. Wikipedia seems to be the only place that mentions him. There's a teenager with a facebook page, and a few sites for a buisnessman who did a web interview, but nothing on a politician or Christian leader. Zero news hits, image hits do not show any individual consistently, in other words, I can find nothing to prove he exists. Sven Manguard Talk 02:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Procedural close: When I AfD'ed this, it popped up that someone AfD'ed it yesterday, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill van Rij.
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
WP:OR I don't know that "spiritual" is a typical genre of film like horror or romantic comedy, but it if is, then a properly-sourced article with links that satisfy guidelines should be written. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:17, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:ORG. no references and no coverage in gnews [16]. LibStar ( talk) 04:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. The references are not yet strong, but it has a reasonable history and it could be improved. -- Bduke (Discussion) 00:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Umeå#Culture. ( non-admin closure) ⅊ ™ 00:33, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
fails WP:GNG. uncited and possibly original research. hardly anything in gnews [17]. LibStar ( talk) 03:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:15, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
I can't find any significant coverage for this comic company. Joe Chill ( talk) 23:39, 13 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep under WP:SK ground 1. NAC— S Marshall T/ C 01:07, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD from July 2009! No evidence this footballer meets WP:ATHLETE or WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 00:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band of unstable membership, no albums or at least singles released, doesn't even have its own website. Incarnatus ( talk) 18:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:48, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
I got one WP:RS between Gnews and regular Google search,not convinced he meets WP:GNG The Resident Anthropologist ( talk) 04:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Thinking Pictures. Ged UK 09:45, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Co-founder of Thinking Pictures. No evidence he satisfies N. Source 1 is his own website. Source 2 are passing mentions. Source 3 is better, an article on some of his work, but little info on Fitch himself, and not enough to build any sort of article. I redirected this to Thinking Pictures but the article creator overturned this. Christopher Connor ( talk) 22:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:12, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non- notable entertainer. As an actor, Wayne has a few minor credits (single episode background roles). As a producer, he has produced a one-man show of another non-notable actor. As a magician, there does not appear to be any indication of notability at all. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 15:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
No reliable sources, official website says launch delayed to 2012, Wikipedia being used for promotional purposes to attract investors. Brief mention is already in United States Football League. Recreate with reliable sources if the league ever does launch. Prior AfD had very weak keep support for 2011 launch only. — UncleDouggie ( talk) 03:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 09:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply
This song didn't chart anywhere, as seen here. A similar discussion is here. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 13:24, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Disputed prod. Non-notable band. Fails WP:MUSIC. DJSasso ( talk) 15:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 12:30, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 21:09, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Ged UK 09:16, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable artist, fails WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. Grsz 11 21:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Is not a notable person (see: Wikipedia:Notability) and in my opinion is little more than a vanity article. Exiledone ( talk) 22:37, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. -- Cirt ( talk) 19:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable failed mall. Stonemason89 ( talk) 22:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply