From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the
dashboard.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / ( talk) 21:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Charles Carnegie, Lord Carnegie
Non-notable - only claim to notability is as a presumptive future Duke, and former Page of Honour. Unable to find any substantive references from Google (other than entries in peerage directories). Unsourced BLP, tagged since June. To the extent that coverage is merited, can be (and is) mentioned in Duke of Fife and Page of Honour. David( Talk) 23:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete as per consensus. Pastor Theo ( talk) 00:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Snorehole
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I dream of horses ( T) @ 23:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete - does not meet WP:BIO requirements. Pastor Theo ( talk) 00:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Jack saperstein
Declined speedy, but I'm pretty sure this still qualifies under A7 and G11. It's pretty much just a resume. Irbisgreif ( talk) 22:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Ttonyb1 you just contradicted your self read your last two posts. Further more what you just said doesn't really make sense and is not truth. With all due respect your opinion doesnt help facts do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hangloose 42 ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply
KeepThere is no "walla" as you called it of any kind. all of this guys roles are legitimate and can be backed up. He has a lead role on a television show airing on a major network that has already been picked up for a second season. I visited the IMDB site and found the one mistake for the Spanish television show, keep in mind IMDB is a publicly contributed site, obviously someone made a mistake on that one section, that mistake has not been carried over to wiki. all you have to do is look up the projects on google or just type in Saperstein into a google search, this family in general is everywhere and involved in everything. Im talking Major league Sports investments, Television production, Real Estate, and College donations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.42.129 ( talk) 09:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC) — 75.82.42.129 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
|
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / ( talk) 22:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Dolphin House
The only claim to notability is that the duchess currently lives there, but notability is not supposed to be temporary. There are only a few hits on Google — in fact there are many more for the eponymous hotels. Article was PRODed, but the tag was removed without explanation, so here we are. Favonian ( talk) 14:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 11:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply Between the Silence
Play that has only had a reading; full production doesn't debut for more than a month. Gsearch and gnews not turning up notability; possible WP:COI issues. Prod contested by original author. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. I was able to dig up this news article which mentions it, but unfortunately, there still isn't enough notability. There are nothing but passing mentions. Maybe some day in the future. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 04:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply FluidVM
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill ( talk) 22:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Institute of Business and Finance. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Certified fund specialist
Appears to be the syllabus of a course offered by some company. Doesn't seem notable, in fact it looks like advertisement. A very similar article, Certified Annuity Specialist is likewise being nominated for deletion. Favonian ( talk) 21:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Institute of Business and Finance. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Certified Annuity Specialist
Appears to be the syllabus of a course offered by some company. Doesn't seem notable, in fact it looks like advertisement. A very similar article, Certified fund specialist is likewise being nominated for deletion. Favonian ( talk) 21:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was speedy delete. Hoax NW ( Talk) 02:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply Cum to Vladdy
No indication whatsoever that this is a notable film, and the entire article looks like self-promotion (see also the nomination on its director, Trent Tepesz) Dahn ( talk) 21:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Enigma msg 06:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC) reply Trent Tepesz
Absolutely no indication of notability (not even contextually), likely shameless self-promotion. Dahn ( talk) 21:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Croxton Records
Good-faith search turned up no signs of notability for this record label. No notable artists or releases on the label. Unreferenced for nearly 3 years Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 16:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Sant satguru gurdev singh
Only nine Google hits besides this article, the article gives no means of verification and really no indication of notability outside of the author's adoration of the article's subject. Are there any reliable sources anywhere on this person? —Largo Plazo ( talk) 21:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 21:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply List of wars in the Muslim world
The introductory sentence of this list presents it as part of the Lists of wars series; however, it is in reality the only list of its kind and not part of any established series—there is no List of wars in the Christian world, List of wars in the Buddhist world, or any other listing of wars by cultural region. A stand-alone list should have a clearly-defined, non-arbitrary, and (relatively) objective scope, which this list does not, and individual items included in the list must share a significant common element. The scope of this list is problematic for five reasons:
Note: Article creator notified using {{ adw}}. – BLACK FALCON ( TALK) 21:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Lorenzo Bringheli
There is no indication of notability for this photographer. Irbisgreif ( talk) 22:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete - falls far from basic notability requirements. Pastor Theo ( talk) 00:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Scooby doo and the toon tour of mysteries
Not so sure what the notability of free promotional DVDs found inside boxes of cookies and cereal are, going to assume very low. This article seems broken in the worst way, cleanup is required as is verification through reliable sources and of course, notability establishment. I can't see a future in this article, even a merge sounds incredibly ludicrous. treelo radda 07:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 11:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply Faith Community ChurchAfDs for this article:
No indication of notability. Hard to find specific sources given the name's genericness... but even after searching I've found nothing. Shadowjams ( talk) 07:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Assertion of notability, but no proof. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:05, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Tony Waterfall
Non-notable. Also, article appears to be written autobiographically John 07:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to nLite and vLite. Cirt ( talk) 23:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply TinyXP
Non-notable sub-distribution of nlite. Was redirected to nlite then restored to a full article. Nothing to merge here, just get rid of it. SchmuckyTheCat ( talk) 07:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete as per consensus. Pastor Theo ( talk) 00:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Dean Lyness
Fails WP:Athlete Shadowjams ( talk) 07:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to establish a consensus. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Josefina Tanganelli Plana
Unable to identify any significant coverage despite searching under entire and first-last only (see above {{ find sources}} links). I would be delighted to withdraw this nomination if anyone comes up with something. Bongo matic 07:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Robert Joseph Levy
Unable to find reliable third party sources about this individual. His books do not appear to have been reviewed. Bongo matic 08:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 21:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Tera Heart
No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 ( talk) 10:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Awake (Dream Theater album). NW ( Talk) 21:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply A Mind Beside Itself
Contested prod. This article occupies a space between album and song: it is about a three song suite on Dream Theater's album Awake. Nevertheless, awesomeness is not an inclusion category; an article about three contiguous songs on an album that are designed to dovetail and function as one song is still functionally an article about a song, and it fails WP:NSONGS. "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article" and that even if a song is notable, it should only be treated in a separate article "when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article...." This song kicks ass, but it doesn't shoulder its burden under NSONGS. - Simon Dodd { U· T· C· WP:LAW } 13:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Alexey Belyanin
Does not appear to satisfy WP:N or WP:PROF. The article itself is somewhat of a substub. It could very well be notable, but I can't find any indication so. (count this nom as a neutral !vote.) TimothyRias ( talk) 12:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 21:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Ben (dog)
Unnotable dog "actor" maybe - no source to even prove the dog was named Ben. Fails WP:N. Speedy declined in may because he is not a person, and second speedy declined because it survived the first speedy. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 13:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with no participation aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply David Williams (Son of Dork)
no real notability shown outside band. rumoured to be dating someone seems to be the only outside claim, not what I see as making him notable. redirect is not appropriate due to title being not a reasonable search term. Duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was baleet. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply PhotoScatter
The writer feels " even the littlest of things, have the quality to be in books. Or online Encyclopedias". Unfortunately for him, Wikipedia has a different standard. The subject of this article fails WP:N by a long run, as it does not have "substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources independent of the subject". Delete, please. Ironholds ( talk) 18:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 21:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply I Go Hard, I Go Home
No assertion of notability. Fails WP:MUSIC. Crotchety Old Man ( talk) 18:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Latino Legends Team
There are no reliable third-party references that establish the notability of this subject. There is one NY Times reference that only verifies a fact in the article and does nothing to help with notability. The other sources are primary sources and aren't enough to establish reliability. There's a template for this article too, which should be deleted if this AfD results in a delete vote. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 13:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was baleet. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply PhotoScatter
The writer feels " even the littlest of things, have the quality to be in books. Or online Encyclopedias". Unfortunately for him, Wikipedia has a different standard. The subject of this article fails WP:N by a long run, as it does not have "substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources independent of the subject". Delete, please. Ironholds ( talk) 18:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Les Davies
Footballer for Bangor City FC, the article states it's a "semi-professional" league. Does that pass WP:ATHLETE? If not, there's Category:Bangor City F.C. players. Lara 18:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Bridgeplayer ( talk) 21:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Captain Jack (band). Cirt ( talk) 23:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Liza da Costa
Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. Some of the info may be worth merging into Captain Jack (band). Lara 19:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 17:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC) reply ActiveDogs
This is a game that was apparently "announced" in 2005, despite there being absolutely no information on it. The only citation is a blank IGN page. The developer has no information available. There has been no update on this game in 4 years. Publisher: TBA, Release Date: TBA. I am more than comfortable with saying that this game does not seriously exist and thus this page can and should be removed. Re-add the article if the game ends up being real years from now. Stump ( talk) 20:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. I'm not going to merge, considering that there will always be mods for PC games; if they don't have notability, there's no point in listing them. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply San Andreas Multi Player
fails WP:GNG - non notable bit of software. Ironholds ( talk) 20:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Phil Jones (footballer)
Original PROD removed citing the reason being "Phil Jones will be making his 1st team debut in League Cup vs Gillingham tomorrow. Not to mention he was today given a 1st shirt no." — which is/was crystal ballery. He did not play against Gillingham [16] [17] and has not played in a fully-professional league/cup, thus the article fails WP:ATHLETE. Also fails WP:GNG as there is no significant independent coverage. -- Jimbo [online] 20:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Staxringold talk contribs 02:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Tim Wooding
Article was originally PROD'ed with the rationale "Footballer who does not meet the WP:ATHLETE or WP:N guidelines." then contested with the rationale "Rushden and Diamonds is a pro side, so Wooding meets the letter of WP:ATHELETE. Whether he meets the spirit of it is something else entirely." However, what WP:ATHLETE actually says is that a player has to have competed at a fully professional level of the sport. Wooding only ever played for Rushden in the Football Conference which was not then, is not now, and never has been, a fully professional league. I'm not 100% sure that Rushden themselves were even full-time professionals during his time with the club. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 19:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. With no prejudice against merging following some discussion. Some indication that a merger is preferred over a standalone article below. Protonk ( talk) 03:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Brett DiBiase
This person has not done anything on his own yet. Being a descendant of a notable person does not make one notable. ArcAngel ( talk) 19:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Redirect to Randy Couture Cheers, I' mperator 20:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Ryan Couture
Subject is an amateur mixed martial arts fighter only given coverage because he's son of Randy Couture. I'm unsure if the coverage he's received is substantial enough to meet WP:BIO as most of it seems to be routine coverage of the type "Hey, did you know Couture's son is fighting? He just won his latest fight, making him 3-1 as an amateur". I'm nominating even though I'm neutral because as someone who's interested in how he'll develop as a fighter I'm probably not the best judge of notability. -- aktsu ( t / c) 18:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. \ Backslash Forwardslash / ( talk) 21:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Badoo
Article whose notability is in question; improperly sourced article lacking in-line citations and whose only "sources" are shaky. Corporation that operates this website is questioned as a data-mining service or large-scale spamming system — Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!) What I Do / What I Say 18:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply James Sang Lee
Non-notable individual. Acting roles mostly uncredited. Unable to find independent support for championships. Ghits lacking substance and no GNEWS coverage other than a couple of one line mentions. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb1 ( talk) 18:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to The Paradiso Girls. NW ( Talk) 21:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Crazy Horse (Paradiso Girls album)
this album is not sourced properly, relies hevaily on blogs and does not fully meet WP:Notability (music) because the group have only had one charted song. The page contains way to much speculation and according to the rules for an album to be considered notable it must have a cover, tracklisting and singles as well as background information. This page has one of the 4 criteria and the name is even sourced dubiously from twitter (how reliable is that source?), should be deleted until a firm title and release date are announced. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 17:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Valentina Vaughn
No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 ( talk) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Skomorokh 18:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Puzzle Hub
Though it consider a non-notable game, it doesn't classify the notability and it is clearly unverifiable source. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 10:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply - i just figured since i first found their puzzles in a professional magazine i buy reguarly and then found out they were becoming known internationally for their specialty subject puzzles especially amoungst pop culture fans that it was warranted, and was a bit surprised that they weren't under the category of 'puzzle makers' already. I guess it'd have to be an american magazine then? i am only new so don't know how this works. there is also a category for professional bloggers, does that not apply here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennyroxmysox ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Wizardman 01:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Ken Gentle (Blacktop)
Only a few references found mentioning him at minor art galleries; featured publications he's been in don't have pages Falcon8765 ( talk) 16:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
"Delete" yeas he has been covered in commercial tourist magazines not "art mags"- If every artist who had a shallow showing resume and spotty write ups could be qualify as a wiki subject then , open the flood gates!, but i don't think Mr Gentle claims on his infomercial are nothing more than his artist statements with a few writes ups to back him up, maybe this all it takes to get on here, wiki want general information, like advertisement does that count? if so than keep him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.65.155.89 ( talk) 22:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC) "Delete" per nom. Clearly fails WP:ARTIST. Eusebeus ( talk) 15:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Wizardman 01:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Zetetic Elench
Non-notable fictional group. 146 Google hits, no Google News hits, no Google Books hits and no Google Scholar hits. The term does not appear in a Google Books search, which suggests that the book does not actually contain the term, so a merge or redirect cannot properly be contemplated, as it runs afoul of WP:Verifiability. Deprodded by an admin without explanation. Abductive ( reasoning) 09:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Valley2 city‽ 04:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Submachine (game)
Contested PROD. Completely unverifiable via reliable secondary sources. Likely madeup. MuZemike 03:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Skomorokh 18:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Rishi Alampur
Tennis player/Football coach - ATP.com [19] has no record of him, which, if he ever had a ranking, as the article claims, would not be the case. The article's ranking claim, including date, seems to have been made up. It claims he was ranked on January 16, 2001, but the ATP did not release a list on that day - a list of ranked Canadian players for January 15 [20] and January 29 [21] (two closest ATP ranking release dates) does not list him. He did play in qualifying for ITF Futures tournaments twice it seems [22], without ever winning a match. Without winning a main draw match he would not ever be ATP ranked, explaining the absence of a ranking and as well as an ATP.com profile page (without a ranking player s aren t profiled). As for football, being an associate coach of a CIS football team, if true, is not, surely, WP:Notable. Mayumashu ( talk) 01:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Impolex
Non-notable film. Lacking GNEWS and GHits of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1 ( talk) 22:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Smartworks
Orphaned since 2006, unedited since 2007, one-line unsourced stub with no claims for notability. Only edit by the initial author. Who then was a gentleman? ( talk) 18:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Skomorokh 18:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply AaquaAfDs for this article:
non-notable website - notability is not inherited from parent organisations. Cameron Scott ( talk) 15:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Skomorokh 18:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply David JPC Hilton
BLP with no reliable sources given (or found) about an individual who does not meet WP:BIO in their own right. The information about the movie "My Little Eye" seems to refer to a different David Hilton who was active professionally in 1983 when the subject of the article was 10. TheSmuel ( talk) 09:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Omgpop. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Charles Forman
Non-notable individual. Lacks GNEWS coverage and no GHits of substance. Fails WP:BIO. ttonyb1 ( talk) 03:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was merge to Peermusic. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Ralph Peer, II
Fails WP:BIO - while I can find sources, none of them fulfil the requirements (third-party, reliable, detailed coverage). Indeed, the one third-party source I can find is a direct copy and paste from his biography on the peermusic website. Ironholds ( talk) 02:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Editors favouring deletion with one exception offered nothing to support their arguments, and the coverage cited in support of keeping the article is convincing. Skomorokh 18:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply City Girls
Seems to lack any evidence of notability, they don't even have an album out yet. Whole article seems to be a little speculative and rather spammy. magnius ( talk) 13:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect both. Consensus that the topics are not notable, but no reason offered as to why the pages ought not to be redirected. Skomorokh 18:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply La posada de los muertos
Doesn't assert notability, is a song in an album, and La posada de los muertos was previously nominated for speedy deletion (it's not clear to me whether it was speedily deleted and then subsequenty recreated) LjL ( talk) 20:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply I am also nominating Satania for the same reasons. -- LjL ( talk) 20:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete, with regrets. In light of the cogent nomination, the burden of proof is on the asserters of notability to prove their case, and unfortunately the sources produced in this instance do not support retaining a biography of a living person. Skomorokh 18:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Alex Kade
Prodded by me and contested. Does not appear to satisfy the criteria of WP:BIO. Google Web, News, Books, and Scholar searches for "Alex [or Alexander] Kade +"General Motors" establish that, yes, he has received or shared some patents but turn up no information at all about the person, so that the biographical information in the article seems basically unverifiable. Of the two references supplied in the article, the first contains no mention of his name, and the second is one of those self-supplied what-I'm-doing-now alumnus notes in a university magazine. Other than the in-house GM ones, the "awards" listed seem to be for GM innovations rather than for him personally (though I'm just guessing, since I can't find any evidence of them online). Deor ( talk) 14:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 23:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Witch (etymology)
Nothing but etymology, which is dictionary content. Also includes unrelated section on the word "Wicca". Powers T 15:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. As fences &*windows says, this is borderline WP:BLP1E. tedder ( talk) 12:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply Anjool Malde
I can't see how he is particularly notable. There are millions of journalists out there, many who can refer to famous people they have interviewed, so why is this one so notable? Andrew Duffell ( talk) 09:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 13:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Derek Kettela
There is no evidence of notability for this photographer. Irbisgreif ( talk) 22:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 13:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Caio Iwan
Similar to the Les Davies nom. Iwan seems to fail WP:ATHLETE for not playing in a professional league or for a professional team. Most of the coverage I could find is trivial at best. Spiderone 15:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was merge to The Culture. Redirected for now. An editor can reach into the history in order to merge content per the below. Protonk ( talk) 03:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Involved
Non-notable fictional group. Some searching using the authors name revealed no Google News hits, no Google Books hits and no Google Scholar hits. This searching also reveals that the title is not appropriate for redirecting. Deprodded by an admin without explanation. Abductive ( reasoning) 23:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC);: reply
|
The result was keep. Protonk ( talk) 03:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Another Day (Dream Theater song)
WP:NSONG tells us three things relevant to this nomination. First, "[m]ost songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article." Second, songs must must the requirements of WP:GNG, although placement on "national or significant music charts ... [or winning] significant awards or honors" establishes a presumption of notability. And third, even if a song is notable, it should only be treated in a separate article "when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article...." This song fails to clear that hurdle and should be deleted or merged into Images and Words.
- Simon Dodd { U· T· C· WP:LAW } 18:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Can create redirect if you want. Wizardman 01:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Trifectant
Notability not established. This is a brand name not a generic product. There are 2 news articles available on google news and both of these old articles only mention the product in passing rather than establishing any notability. Sources for notability unlikely to be found and as the page has been tagged for improvement for 15 months without addressing the issues, this counts as a near hopeless case. Ash ( talk) 23:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 13:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Addison Alves de Oliveira
Article is unreferenced and is about an athlete who has not played in a fully-pro league. Prod was removed by editor claiming that he has played for professional clubs (Cartagena and Hercules), but he played for them in the Segunda B which is a regionalized and not fully-pro league. Article fails general notability guideline as well. Jogurney ( talk) 15:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 05:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Julia Zass
Procedural nomination / contested prod. Prodder's concern was: "A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: (links omitted) Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability." As prodder is an admin, I removed a subsequent CSD A7 tag and am bringing this here. No opinion on the merits. Tim Song ( talk) 15:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion, not even from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Beverage Digest
I declined the speedy deletion nomination, so I'm bringing it here for further evaluation. I remain neutral. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 23:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Andrew J Newman
Article asserts no notability. Subject fails wp:prof, having only written a few papers. Article's references are poor. Bonewah ( talk) 14:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 05:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Wynters Mixtapes
Non-notable mixtape; fails WP:SONG, download-only prelude to unreleased album; unreferenced Chzz ► 11:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply WHAT?I spend a long time doing this and this it should STAY! It is not just 1 mixtape but 2 and also many more to come also. Alot of people would like to know about them and dont know where to go, Well in this page we are telling them. The 1st mixtape was a free mixtape on her website but the new mixtape "The Cure For Wynter" is going for sale on I-Tunes. THAT IS A LEGAL ALBUM. Not only that but they are releasing a WORLD WIDE SINGLE!! "Renegade" is to be an official single and the video has been shot. This page is not just a little page that nobody will visit or will never be updates cos there is no info. This will be very active and is IMPORTANT! Why is brooke hogan and many more allowed one?
Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mepolo ( talk • contribs) 12:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Discussion on the talk page is free to lead to a redirect into a parent article if that is desired. NW ( Talk) 03:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Dermod O'Brien, 5th Baron InchiquinAfDs for this article:
fails WP:BIO. Ironholds ( talk) 11:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 23:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Hidan of Maukbeiangjow
No WP:RS at all, and no evidence of WP:NOTE. Verbal chat 09:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Deleted as A7 by Fribbler. NW ( Talk) 03:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Prabhu Bajyar
I nominate this article with sadness as the subject sounds like a fine upstanding gentleman - but sadly not notable. His wartime decoration, the Africa Star requires only one day's service in North Africa and there must have been hundreds of thousands of them issued. This is not enough, in my opinion, to meet WP:BIO. His status as a politician is only at the village level (if I have understood the term Panchayat correctly) and so fails WP:POLITICIAN. Nothing else in the article amounts to a claim to notability and there are no references, failing WP:N. SpinningSpark 09:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was speedy delete. A7 Tone 21:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply The Adventures of Robloxian Hearts
non-notable youtube creations - fails WP:N. Ironholds ( talk) 08:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was speedy delete, no showing of minimal importance and obvious advertising to boot: solutions company established ... to develop and manage web sites that help customer to communicate there message, products and services to potential clients and existing customers - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 16:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply Www.beonline.ws
completely non-notable company/website - fails WP:ORG Ironholds ( talk) 08:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 04:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Desert state
This article is based entirely on its assertion that a desert state is comprised of at least 50% desert. However, there is nothing to support this - nor could I find anything. Therefore, the whole thing appears to fail WP:V. I42 ( talk) 07:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. — Jake Wartenberg 04:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Holly Bodimeade
fails WP:ENT , simply appearing in a notable TV show does not guarantee notability. hardly any indepth coverage of this actress. [33]. LibStar ( talk) 07:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 05:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Mistreat (band)
Totally fails WP:MUSIC; no coverage in independent, third-party reliable sources... all that can be found are the likes of Myspace, Last.fm, forums, and entertainingly, Stormfront. No releases even on notable indie labels, no significant tours, not even a website. There is a claim to notability ("the best known RAC band in Finland") hence me bringing it here rather than slapping a speedy on it, but without a source, this is just spam. Blackmetalbaz ( talk) 07:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Bhakti Vikasa SwamiAfDs for this article:
Non notable swami - primary sources article. was already deleted and AfD is on record, no other publications since. All recently added references do not refer or support notability. Has to be deleted and redirected to ISKCON. Wikid as© 07:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Additional criteria for notability was membership in Governing Body Commission. Bhakti Vikasa Swami is a swami and initiating guru in ISKCON, which makes him a member of a highly selective small group of religious leaders. I've made some research into the topic. Presently, there're 85 swamis in ISKCON, but only 50 of them are initiating gurus. Being just a swami or an initiating guru in ISKCON doesn't make one notable, but being both at the same time does. More so if one is a member of the Governing Body Commission (which is not the case here). Another opinion expressed in previous AfD debates (with which I tend to agree),
ISKCON leaders can have notability established from ISKCON's sources due to ISKCON's status as a significant, recognized stream of Hinduism in the West and Wikipedia's general practice of permitting use of religious sources to establish the notability of a religion's senior leaders.-- Gaura79 ( talk) 11:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Cedarpc
Non-notable business, references provided do not satisfy WP:RS. <>Multi-Xfer<> ( talk) 06:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Alright, this was my first editorial, so please take it easy on me. I am open to suggestions and willing to listen, so long as the other party is open minded. Fact: CedarPC managed to develop a Multi-Million dollar corporation in the worst recession in what some would say since the great depression; creating new jobs, all while helping young people through apprenticeship and training programs. Sournce - http://static.mgnetwork.com/vab/pdf/fan50.pdf Source - http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2008/10/20/daily34.html Source - http://www.myskillsource.org/home/documents/EYEProgramFinalReportPresentation2008.NVWIBMeeting.pdf
Why don't you develop a multi-million dollar corporation and win #11 out 50 of the fastest growing companies during this economic crisis, since you see this "every day". Copyright: I asked management at CedarPC for permission to use their logo and trademark for Wikipedia through their "Contact Management", they agreed, and are going to get their corporate attorney to draft a written authorization. If I had put the wrong terms of usage, that can be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anetineer ( talk • contribs) 04:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 04:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply David "Yankee Thunder" SniderAfDs for this article:
This article isn't needed until the athlete goes pro. Irbisgreif ( talk) 06:49, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 04:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Terrainian
Non notable neolgism, invented. Talk page says "This word has been added as a protologism" but that is a justification for deletion, not keeping the page. Also nominating:
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 13:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Bill Dawes
no third party reliable sources to attest to his notability Theserialcomma ( talk) 07:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply 5-Hour Energy
The article is written like an advertisement. There is asserted notability, but it is unsourced. All of the sources listed are from the producer, so they can't be used. — Dæ dαlus Contribs 03:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 03:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Being money
Non notable YouTube video. Prod declined without comment. The "reception" section speaks for itself in terms of lack of notability: " over 200 hits as of mid 2009". Delete. Hairhorn ( talk) 03:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that this is a POV fork. NW ( Talk) 01:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Evidence of FSB involvement in the Russian apartment bombingsAfDs for this article:
...et cetera, et cetera. Since the material is already present at other articles, and since we already have a valid content fork of Russian apartment bombings ( Theories of Russian apartment bombings) I see absolutely no need for this kind of POV article. Offliner ( talk) 17:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Besides, nothing had changed since the previous AfD discussion of this article (one could read it). Biophys ( talk) 01:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 01:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply National Brick Wall Day
un-notable unofficial holiday Abc518 ( talk) 02:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Speedy Delete G3. Admrboltz ( talk) 13:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply Barry Gibb (drink)
This has no sources and may well be a hoax. It provides no evidence of notability. Grahame ( talk) 01:53, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Staxringold talk contribs 01:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Sir Donough O'Brien, 1st BaronetAfDs for this article:
User creating huge number of unreferenced stubs. No references to establish notability and Baronets are not automatically notable. <>Multi-Xfer<> ( talk) 01:50, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 01:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Jake and the Burtones
In my opinion, this band does not meet the notability criteria. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 01:43, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. Discounting the "per x", it's notable, "not notable", and "number of employees" arguments and the exploratory nomination, we have two editors who maintain that the cited sources confer notability, and one editor, Whpq, who gives a more detailed analysis to the contrary. There is insufficient discussion between these two perspectives to determine consensus, and a third relist would be inappropriate, so I close this now without prejudice against recreation at a later date. Skomorokh 18:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Edudigm
More of advertisement. Might fail WP:N Srikanth ( speak) 06:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Mohammed Shakir
Appears to fail WP:ATHLETE as he hasn't played in a professional league Spiderone ( talk) 16:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 03:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Unreleased Zoids
This is a trivial list of canceled toys with absolutely nothing to verify their existence. TTN ( talk) 16:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect. There is consensus that a standalone article is not justified, the nominator was amenable to a redirect/merge, and the two editors favouring deletion did not indicate why a redirect would be inappropriate, so following Cunard's rationale. Editors are free to take whatever useful material in the history of the redirected article and use it elsewhere if appropriate. Skomorokh 17:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Take the Time
WP:NSONG tells us three things relevant to this nomination. First, "[m]ost songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article." Second, songs must must the requirements of WP:GNG, although placement on "national or significant music charts ... [or winning] significant awards or honors" establishes a presumption of notability. And third, even if a song is notable, it should only be treated in a separate article "when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article...." This song fails to clear that hurdle and should be deleted or merged into Images and Words.
- Simon Dodd { U· T· C· WP:LAW } 18:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was merge to Mutant (Marvel Comics). — Jake Wartenberg 04:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Cheyarafim
This fictional race of angel-like mutants has only 94 regular Google hits, zero Google News hits, zero Google Books hits, zero Google Scholar hits and zero notability. Deprodded. Abductive ( reasoning) 23:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Skomorokh 17:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Antonia Donatiello
The only reason of notability appears to be "a lot of prize[s]" which seem actually pretty unheard of and, when googled, return almost only personal pages of people who won them (and in some case, this very article is the first result returned). Goochelaar ( talk) 21:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was speedy delete. A1, apparently not something for article space Tone 21:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply Monobook (skin)
Improper cross-wiki CNR, is not an article and does not point at one. MBisanz talk 01:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 03:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Abutre'sAfDs for this article:
Fails criteria for WP:BLP. This article contains significant negative information about living persons, but only offers one article in Portuguese to verify the long list of allegations against five named persons and the club as a whole (54 chapters, unknown number of people per chapter). There are perhaps 20 news articles found by Google that mention this group, but they are all in Portuguese. The language issue would not normally be grounds for any action because the article could wait for translation help. But this article has remained in a poorly-cited state for three years now. If these accusations of drug dealing, extortion, prostitution and so on are false, how many more years will they remain here damaging the reputations of a sizable number of living people waiting for Portuguese and English speaker come along undo the damage? BLP says "We must get the article right" but even if a skilled translator were to come along, aren't there hundreds of far more important articles about Brazil and Portugal that need attention? It might well be that articles detailing lurid criminality by living people, based solely on non-English sources are beyond the current capabilities of en.Wikipedia. Going into this much depth on topics without any English-language secondary sources might have to wait for a future time when circumstances change, but that would avoid harm to real people, at the cost of an article of very low importance. All the negative information could be deleted, but then what is left to justify notability? The fact that they like to ride black choppers? Dbratland ( talk) 01:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Listed for 27 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Order of Barristers
All that I can find is trivia mentions. Joe Chill ( talk) 21:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete – a non-notable organization per WP:ORG. Jamie S93 20:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Alpha Theta Chi
This article contains details about three distinct organizations: a sorority at Vincennes University, a fraternity at Hope College, and a sorority at the University of Michigan. As far as I can tell, none of the three meet notability criteria outlined at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Peacock ( talk) 20:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 01:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Kalamanthis
This fictional drug has no reliable third party sources available anywhere. The article does not claim that is important within its fictional setting. Deprodded. Abductive ( reasoning) 22:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 03:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Best Bad Luck I Ever Had
Contested prod. Book by apparent non-notable author. Only provided refs are to authors homepage and Amazon. <>Multi-Xfer<> ( talk) 22:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply List of highest paid American television stars
|
edit]] | [[Talk:List of highest paid American television stars | talk]] | [[Special:PageHistory/List of highest paid American television stars | history]] | [[Special:ProtectPage/List of highest paid American television stars | protect]] | [[Special:DeletePage/List of highest paid American television stars | delete]] |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) (
delete) – (
View AfD)
This is an unsourced, trivial list. Logan | Talk 21:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Note to closing admin: While the sourcing for some of the individual salary levels has been greatly improved, there is still virtually no sourcing for the claims that these are the "highest paid" performers. The newspiece which started this whole thing is a feature that runs annually in TV Guide, giving examples of top-level salaries, not a comprehensive analysis. Note, for example, that the "morning" section omits Barbara Walters, verifiably sourced in her Wikipedia article at a much higher salary than all but one of the "top" performers. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 15:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply I have corrected that error, and as i said it can be changed and updated anytime, so it can be helped and make it acpectable for wikipedia, and again as i said with some work this could become a very good artical. -- Pedro J. the rookie 17:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Checked on Tyra, it is solved and what do you mean with Axed. -- Pedro J. the rookie 19:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply
i see. -- Pedro J. the rookie 19:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. One comment normally doesn't constitute a consensus but it did establish that this newspaper exists. No prejudice against a speedy renomination if someone wishes to discuss the subject's notability. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Solosol
I tried to find a source that indicated that this underground Argentine newspaper ever existed, but failed. It only lasted for one year, until the founder left his country. Bringing to AfD in case somebody has better luck than me. Abductive ( reasoning) 21:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment Not going to give an opinion on notability, but I found this interview with Gustavo Aguerre, the claimed founder of the magazine. It is in German, but it has a picture of the front cover of the magazine thus verifying the existence of both Gustav and the magazine. The article says there were four issues and a circulation of 4000. I don't know how notable that is for an underground magazine but four issues does not sound very many to me. SpinningSpark 12:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Implementing DGG's suggestion.. NW ( Talk) 01:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Tens System
Is this term standard?? None of the first 30 results in Google meet both of the following criteria:
|
The result was keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. I personally would suggest a redirect until the marriage but that's an editorial decision. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Jonas Bergström
Unreferenced BLP, fiance of a princess. How is he notable? Lara 20:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Staxringold talk contribs 00:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Girl and the Sea
Fails WP:MUSIC Crotchety Old Man ( talk) 19:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Pussycat Dolls Present: Girlicious. Staxringold talk contribs 00:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Carrie JonesAfDs for this article:
Fails WP:MUSICBIO. There are no reliable sources. SilkTork * YES! 00:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 01:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Angels of Modern Destruction
fails WP:MUSIC Ironholds ( talk) 19:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Speedy close as a test page. John Vandenberg ( chat) 06:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC) reply Running and ski brand
Subject is adequately covered by Karhu Sports and Karhu articles. PhilKnight ( talk) 21:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the
dashboard.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / ( talk) 21:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Charles Carnegie, Lord Carnegie
Non-notable - only claim to notability is as a presumptive future Duke, and former Page of Honour. Unable to find any substantive references from Google (other than entries in peerage directories). Unsourced BLP, tagged since June. To the extent that coverage is merited, can be (and is) mentioned in Duke of Fife and Page of Honour. David( Talk) 23:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete as per consensus. Pastor Theo ( talk) 00:12, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Snorehole
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I dream of horses ( T) @ 23:18, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete - does not meet WP:BIO requirements. Pastor Theo ( talk) 00:15, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Jack saperstein
Declined speedy, but I'm pretty sure this still qualifies under A7 and G11. It's pretty much just a resume. Irbisgreif ( talk) 22:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Ttonyb1 you just contradicted your self read your last two posts. Further more what you just said doesn't really make sense and is not truth. With all due respect your opinion doesnt help facts do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hangloose 42 ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply
KeepThere is no "walla" as you called it of any kind. all of this guys roles are legitimate and can be backed up. He has a lead role on a television show airing on a major network that has already been picked up for a second season. I visited the IMDB site and found the one mistake for the Spanish television show, keep in mind IMDB is a publicly contributed site, obviously someone made a mistake on that one section, that mistake has not been carried over to wiki. all you have to do is look up the projects on google or just type in Saperstein into a google search, this family in general is everywhere and involved in everything. Im talking Major league Sports investments, Television production, Real Estate, and College donations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.42.129 ( talk) 09:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC) — 75.82.42.129 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
|
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / ( talk) 22:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Dolphin House
The only claim to notability is that the duchess currently lives there, but notability is not supposed to be temporary. There are only a few hits on Google — in fact there are many more for the eponymous hotels. Article was PRODed, but the tag was removed without explanation, so here we are. Favonian ( talk) 14:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 11:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply Between the Silence
Play that has only had a reading; full production doesn't debut for more than a month. Gsearch and gnews not turning up notability; possible WP:COI issues. Prod contested by original author. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. I was able to dig up this news article which mentions it, but unfortunately, there still isn't enough notability. There are nothing but passing mentions. Maybe some day in the future. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 04:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply FluidVM
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill ( talk) 22:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Institute of Business and Finance. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Certified fund specialist
Appears to be the syllabus of a course offered by some company. Doesn't seem notable, in fact it looks like advertisement. A very similar article, Certified Annuity Specialist is likewise being nominated for deletion. Favonian ( talk) 21:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Institute of Business and Finance. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Certified Annuity Specialist
Appears to be the syllabus of a course offered by some company. Doesn't seem notable, in fact it looks like advertisement. A very similar article, Certified fund specialist is likewise being nominated for deletion. Favonian ( talk) 21:48, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was speedy delete. Hoax NW ( Talk) 02:09, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply Cum to Vladdy
No indication whatsoever that this is a notable film, and the entire article looks like self-promotion (see also the nomination on its director, Trent Tepesz) Dahn ( talk) 21:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Enigma msg 06:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC) reply Trent Tepesz
Absolutely no indication of notability (not even contextually), likely shameless self-promotion. Dahn ( talk) 21:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Croxton Records
Good-faith search turned up no signs of notability for this record label. No notable artists or releases on the label. Unreferenced for nearly 3 years Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 16:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Sant satguru gurdev singh
Only nine Google hits besides this article, the article gives no means of verification and really no indication of notability outside of the author's adoration of the article's subject. Are there any reliable sources anywhere on this person? —Largo Plazo ( talk) 21:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 21:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply List of wars in the Muslim world
The introductory sentence of this list presents it as part of the Lists of wars series; however, it is in reality the only list of its kind and not part of any established series—there is no List of wars in the Christian world, List of wars in the Buddhist world, or any other listing of wars by cultural region. A stand-alone list should have a clearly-defined, non-arbitrary, and (relatively) objective scope, which this list does not, and individual items included in the list must share a significant common element. The scope of this list is problematic for five reasons:
Note: Article creator notified using {{ adw}}. – BLACK FALCON ( TALK) 21:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:04, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Lorenzo Bringheli
There is no indication of notability for this photographer. Irbisgreif ( talk) 22:00, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete - falls far from basic notability requirements. Pastor Theo ( talk) 00:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Scooby doo and the toon tour of mysteries
Not so sure what the notability of free promotional DVDs found inside boxes of cookies and cereal are, going to assume very low. This article seems broken in the worst way, cleanup is required as is verification through reliable sources and of course, notability establishment. I can't see a future in this article, even a merge sounds incredibly ludicrous. treelo radda 07:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 11:50, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply Faith Community ChurchAfDs for this article:
No indication of notability. Hard to find specific sources given the name's genericness... but even after searching I've found nothing. Shadowjams ( talk) 07:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Assertion of notability, but no proof. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:05, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Tony Waterfall
Non-notable. Also, article appears to be written autobiographically John 07:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to nLite and vLite. Cirt ( talk) 23:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply TinyXP
Non-notable sub-distribution of nlite. Was redirected to nlite then restored to a full article. Nothing to merge here, just get rid of it. SchmuckyTheCat ( talk) 07:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Delete as per consensus. Pastor Theo ( talk) 00:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Dean Lyness
Fails WP:Athlete Shadowjams ( talk) 07:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to establish a consensus. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Josefina Tanganelli Plana
Unable to identify any significant coverage despite searching under entire and first-last only (see above {{ find sources}} links). I would be delighted to withdraw this nomination if anyone comes up with something. Bongo matic 07:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Robert Joseph Levy
Unable to find reliable third party sources about this individual. His books do not appear to have been reviewed. Bongo matic 08:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 21:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Tera Heart
No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 ( talk) 10:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Awake (Dream Theater album). NW ( Talk) 21:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply A Mind Beside Itself
Contested prod. This article occupies a space between album and song: it is about a three song suite on Dream Theater's album Awake. Nevertheless, awesomeness is not an inclusion category; an article about three contiguous songs on an album that are designed to dovetail and function as one song is still functionally an article about a song, and it fails WP:NSONGS. "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article" and that even if a song is notable, it should only be treated in a separate article "when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article...." This song kicks ass, but it doesn't shoulder its burden under NSONGS. - Simon Dodd { U· T· C· WP:LAW } 13:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Alexey Belyanin
Does not appear to satisfy WP:N or WP:PROF. The article itself is somewhat of a substub. It could very well be notable, but I can't find any indication so. (count this nom as a neutral !vote.) TimothyRias ( talk) 12:58, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 21:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Ben (dog)
Unnotable dog "actor" maybe - no source to even prove the dog was named Ben. Fails WP:N. Speedy declined in may because he is not a person, and second speedy declined because it survived the first speedy. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 13:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with no participation aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply David Williams (Son of Dork)
no real notability shown outside band. rumoured to be dating someone seems to be the only outside claim, not what I see as making him notable. redirect is not appropriate due to title being not a reasonable search term. Duffbeerforme ( talk) 13:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was baleet. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply PhotoScatter
The writer feels " even the littlest of things, have the quality to be in books. Or online Encyclopedias". Unfortunately for him, Wikipedia has a different standard. The subject of this article fails WP:N by a long run, as it does not have "substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources independent of the subject". Delete, please. Ironholds ( talk) 18:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 21:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply I Go Hard, I Go Home
No assertion of notability. Fails WP:MUSIC. Crotchety Old Man ( talk) 18:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Latino Legends Team
There are no reliable third-party references that establish the notability of this subject. There is one NY Times reference that only verifies a fact in the article and does nothing to help with notability. The other sources are primary sources and aren't enough to establish reliability. There's a template for this article too, which should be deleted if this AfD results in a delete vote. KV5 ( Talk • Phils) 13:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was baleet. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply PhotoScatter
The writer feels " even the littlest of things, have the quality to be in books. Or online Encyclopedias". Unfortunately for him, Wikipedia has a different standard. The subject of this article fails WP:N by a long run, as it does not have "substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources independent of the subject". Delete, please. Ironholds ( talk) 18:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:06, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Les Davies
Footballer for Bangor City FC, the article states it's a "semi-professional" league. Does that pass WP:ATHLETE? If not, there's Category:Bangor City F.C. players. Lara 18:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Bridgeplayer ( talk) 21:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Captain Jack (band). Cirt ( talk) 23:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Liza da Costa
Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. Some of the info may be worth merging into Captain Jack (band). Lara 19:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 17:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC) reply ActiveDogs
This is a game that was apparently "announced" in 2005, despite there being absolutely no information on it. The only citation is a blank IGN page. The developer has no information available. There has been no update on this game in 4 years. Publisher: TBA, Release Date: TBA. I am more than comfortable with saying that this game does not seriously exist and thus this page can and should be removed. Re-add the article if the game ends up being real years from now. Stump ( talk) 20:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. I'm not going to merge, considering that there will always be mods for PC games; if they don't have notability, there's no point in listing them. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:08, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply San Andreas Multi Player
fails WP:GNG - non notable bit of software. Ironholds ( talk) 20:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 05:09, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Phil Jones (footballer)
Original PROD removed citing the reason being "Phil Jones will be making his 1st team debut in League Cup vs Gillingham tomorrow. Not to mention he was today given a 1st shirt no." — which is/was crystal ballery. He did not play against Gillingham [16] [17] and has not played in a fully-professional league/cup, thus the article fails WP:ATHLETE. Also fails WP:GNG as there is no significant independent coverage. -- Jimbo [online] 20:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Staxringold talk contribs 02:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Tim Wooding
Article was originally PROD'ed with the rationale "Footballer who does not meet the WP:ATHLETE or WP:N guidelines." then contested with the rationale "Rushden and Diamonds is a pro side, so Wooding meets the letter of WP:ATHELETE. Whether he meets the spirit of it is something else entirely." However, what WP:ATHLETE actually says is that a player has to have competed at a fully professional level of the sport. Wooding only ever played for Rushden in the Football Conference which was not then, is not now, and never has been, a fully professional league. I'm not 100% sure that Rushden themselves were even full-time professionals during his time with the club. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 19:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. With no prejudice against merging following some discussion. Some indication that a merger is preferred over a standalone article below. Protonk ( talk) 03:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Brett DiBiase
This person has not done anything on his own yet. Being a descendant of a notable person does not make one notable. ArcAngel ( talk) 19:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Redirect to Randy Couture Cheers, I' mperator 20:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Ryan Couture
Subject is an amateur mixed martial arts fighter only given coverage because he's son of Randy Couture. I'm unsure if the coverage he's received is substantial enough to meet WP:BIO as most of it seems to be routine coverage of the type "Hey, did you know Couture's son is fighting? He just won his latest fight, making him 3-1 as an amateur". I'm nominating even though I'm neutral because as someone who's interested in how he'll develop as a fighter I'm probably not the best judge of notability. -- aktsu ( t / c) 18:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. \ Backslash Forwardslash / ( talk) 21:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Badoo
Article whose notability is in question; improperly sourced article lacking in-line citations and whose only "sources" are shaky. Corporation that operates this website is questioned as a data-mining service or large-scale spamming system — Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!) What I Do / What I Say 18:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply James Sang Lee
Non-notable individual. Acting roles mostly uncredited. Unable to find independent support for championships. Ghits lacking substance and no GNEWS coverage other than a couple of one line mentions. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb1 ( talk) 18:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to The Paradiso Girls. NW ( Talk) 21:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Crazy Horse (Paradiso Girls album)
this album is not sourced properly, relies hevaily on blogs and does not fully meet WP:Notability (music) because the group have only had one charted song. The page contains way to much speculation and according to the rules for an album to be considered notable it must have a cover, tracklisting and singles as well as background information. This page has one of the 4 criteria and the name is even sourced dubiously from twitter (how reliable is that source?), should be deleted until a firm title and release date are announced. Lil-unique1 ( talk) 17:51, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Valentina Vaughn
No significant coverage and doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 ( talk) 10:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Skomorokh 18:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Puzzle Hub
Though it consider a non-notable game, it doesn't classify the notability and it is clearly unverifiable source. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 10:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply - i just figured since i first found their puzzles in a professional magazine i buy reguarly and then found out they were becoming known internationally for their specialty subject puzzles especially amoungst pop culture fans that it was warranted, and was a bit surprised that they weren't under the category of 'puzzle makers' already. I guess it'd have to be an american magazine then? i am only new so don't know how this works. there is also a category for professional bloggers, does that not apply here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennyroxmysox ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Wizardman 01:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Ken Gentle (Blacktop)
Only a few references found mentioning him at minor art galleries; featured publications he's been in don't have pages Falcon8765 ( talk) 16:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
"Delete" yeas he has been covered in commercial tourist magazines not "art mags"- If every artist who had a shallow showing resume and spotty write ups could be qualify as a wiki subject then , open the flood gates!, but i don't think Mr Gentle claims on his infomercial are nothing more than his artist statements with a few writes ups to back him up, maybe this all it takes to get on here, wiki want general information, like advertisement does that count? if so than keep him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.65.155.89 ( talk) 22:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC) "Delete" per nom. Clearly fails WP:ARTIST. Eusebeus ( talk) 15:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Wizardman 01:07, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Zetetic Elench
Non-notable fictional group. 146 Google hits, no Google News hits, no Google Books hits and no Google Scholar hits. The term does not appear in a Google Books search, which suggests that the book does not actually contain the term, so a merge or redirect cannot properly be contemplated, as it runs afoul of WP:Verifiability. Deprodded by an admin without explanation. Abductive ( reasoning) 09:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Valley2 city‽ 04:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Submachine (game)
Contested PROD. Completely unverifiable via reliable secondary sources. Likely madeup. MuZemike 03:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Skomorokh 18:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Rishi Alampur
Tennis player/Football coach - ATP.com [19] has no record of him, which, if he ever had a ranking, as the article claims, would not be the case. The article's ranking claim, including date, seems to have been made up. It claims he was ranked on January 16, 2001, but the ATP did not release a list on that day - a list of ranked Canadian players for January 15 [20] and January 29 [21] (two closest ATP ranking release dates) does not list him. He did play in qualifying for ITF Futures tournaments twice it seems [22], without ever winning a match. Without winning a main draw match he would not ever be ATP ranked, explaining the absence of a ranking and as well as an ATP.com profile page (without a ranking player s aren t profiled). As for football, being an associate coach of a CIS football team, if true, is not, surely, WP:Notable. Mayumashu ( talk) 01:22, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Impolex
Non-notable film. Lacking GNEWS and GHits of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM ttonyb1 ( talk) 22:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Smartworks
Orphaned since 2006, unedited since 2007, one-line unsourced stub with no claims for notability. Only edit by the initial author. Who then was a gentleman? ( talk) 18:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Skomorokh 18:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply AaquaAfDs for this article:
non-notable website - notability is not inherited from parent organisations. Cameron Scott ( talk) 15:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Skomorokh 18:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply David JPC Hilton
BLP with no reliable sources given (or found) about an individual who does not meet WP:BIO in their own right. The information about the movie "My Little Eye" seems to refer to a different David Hilton who was active professionally in 1983 when the subject of the article was 10. TheSmuel ( talk) 09:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Omgpop. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Charles Forman
Non-notable individual. Lacks GNEWS coverage and no GHits of substance. Fails WP:BIO. ttonyb1 ( talk) 03:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was merge to Peermusic. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Ralph Peer, II
Fails WP:BIO - while I can find sources, none of them fulfil the requirements (third-party, reliable, detailed coverage). Indeed, the one third-party source I can find is a direct copy and paste from his biography on the peermusic website. Ironholds ( talk) 02:08, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Editors favouring deletion with one exception offered nothing to support their arguments, and the coverage cited in support of keeping the article is convincing. Skomorokh 18:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply City Girls
Seems to lack any evidence of notability, they don't even have an album out yet. Whole article seems to be a little speculative and rather spammy. magnius ( talk) 13:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect both. Consensus that the topics are not notable, but no reason offered as to why the pages ought not to be redirected. Skomorokh 18:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply La posada de los muertos
Doesn't assert notability, is a song in an album, and La posada de los muertos was previously nominated for speedy deletion (it's not clear to me whether it was speedily deleted and then subsequenty recreated) LjL ( talk) 20:24, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply I am also nominating Satania for the same reasons. -- LjL ( talk) 20:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete, with regrets. In light of the cogent nomination, the burden of proof is on the asserters of notability to prove their case, and unfortunately the sources produced in this instance do not support retaining a biography of a living person. Skomorokh 18:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Alex Kade
Prodded by me and contested. Does not appear to satisfy the criteria of WP:BIO. Google Web, News, Books, and Scholar searches for "Alex [or Alexander] Kade +"General Motors" establish that, yes, he has received or shared some patents but turn up no information at all about the person, so that the biographical information in the article seems basically unverifiable. Of the two references supplied in the article, the first contains no mention of his name, and the second is one of those self-supplied what-I'm-doing-now alumnus notes in a university magazine. Other than the in-house GM ones, the "awards" listed seem to be for GM innovations rather than for him personally (though I'm just guessing, since I can't find any evidence of them online). Deor ( talk) 14:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 23:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Witch (etymology)
Nothing but etymology, which is dictionary content. Also includes unrelated section on the word "Wicca". Powers T 15:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. As fences &*windows says, this is borderline WP:BLP1E. tedder ( talk) 12:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC) reply Anjool Malde
I can't see how he is particularly notable. There are millions of journalists out there, many who can refer to famous people they have interviewed, so why is this one so notable? Andrew Duffell ( talk) 09:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 13:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Derek Kettela
There is no evidence of notability for this photographer. Irbisgreif ( talk) 22:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 13:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Caio Iwan
Similar to the Les Davies nom. Iwan seems to fail WP:ATHLETE for not playing in a professional league or for a professional team. Most of the coverage I could find is trivial at best. Spiderone 15:39, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was merge to The Culture. Redirected for now. An editor can reach into the history in order to merge content per the below. Protonk ( talk) 03:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Involved
Non-notable fictional group. Some searching using the authors name revealed no Google News hits, no Google Books hits and no Google Scholar hits. This searching also reveals that the title is not appropriate for redirecting. Deprodded by an admin without explanation. Abductive ( reasoning) 23:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC);: reply
|
The result was keep. Protonk ( talk) 03:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Another Day (Dream Theater song)
WP:NSONG tells us three things relevant to this nomination. First, "[m]ost songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article." Second, songs must must the requirements of WP:GNG, although placement on "national or significant music charts ... [or winning] significant awards or honors" establishes a presumption of notability. And third, even if a song is notable, it should only be treated in a separate article "when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article...." This song fails to clear that hurdle and should be deleted or merged into Images and Words.
- Simon Dodd { U· T· C· WP:LAW } 18:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Can create redirect if you want. Wizardman 01:10, 4 September 2009 (UTC) reply Trifectant
Notability not established. This is a brand name not a generic product. There are 2 news articles available on google news and both of these old articles only mention the product in passing rather than establishing any notability. Sources for notability unlikely to be found and as the page has been tagged for improvement for 15 months without addressing the issues, this counts as a near hopeless case. Ash ( talk) 23:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 13:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Addison Alves de Oliveira
Article is unreferenced and is about an athlete who has not played in a fully-pro league. Prod was removed by editor claiming that he has played for professional clubs (Cartagena and Hercules), but he played for them in the Segunda B which is a regionalized and not fully-pro league. Article fails general notability guideline as well. Jogurney ( talk) 15:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 05:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Julia Zass
Procedural nomination / contested prod. Prodder's concern was: "A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: (links omitted) Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability." As prodder is an admin, I removed a subsequent CSD A7 tag and am bringing this here. No opinion on the merits. Tim Song ( talk) 15:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion, not even from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 01:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Beverage Digest
I declined the speedy deletion nomination, so I'm bringing it here for further evaluation. I remain neutral. – Juliancolton | Talk 14:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 23:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Andrew J Newman
Article asserts no notability. Subject fails wp:prof, having only written a few papers. Article's references are poor. Bonewah ( talk) 14:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 05:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Wynters Mixtapes
Non-notable mixtape; fails WP:SONG, download-only prelude to unreleased album; unreferenced Chzz ► 11:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply WHAT?I spend a long time doing this and this it should STAY! It is not just 1 mixtape but 2 and also many more to come also. Alot of people would like to know about them and dont know where to go, Well in this page we are telling them. The 1st mixtape was a free mixtape on her website but the new mixtape "The Cure For Wynter" is going for sale on I-Tunes. THAT IS A LEGAL ALBUM. Not only that but they are releasing a WORLD WIDE SINGLE!! "Renegade" is to be an official single and the video has been shot. This page is not just a little page that nobody will visit or will never be updates cos there is no info. This will be very active and is IMPORTANT! Why is brooke hogan and many more allowed one?
Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mepolo ( talk • contribs) 12:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Discussion on the talk page is free to lead to a redirect into a parent article if that is desired. NW ( Talk) 03:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Dermod O'Brien, 5th Baron InchiquinAfDs for this article:
fails WP:BIO. Ironholds ( talk) 11:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 23:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Hidan of Maukbeiangjow
No WP:RS at all, and no evidence of WP:NOTE. Verbal chat 09:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Deleted as A7 by Fribbler. NW ( Talk) 03:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Prabhu Bajyar
I nominate this article with sadness as the subject sounds like a fine upstanding gentleman - but sadly not notable. His wartime decoration, the Africa Star requires only one day's service in North Africa and there must have been hundreds of thousands of them issued. This is not enough, in my opinion, to meet WP:BIO. His status as a politician is only at the village level (if I have understood the term Panchayat correctly) and so fails WP:POLITICIAN. Nothing else in the article amounts to a claim to notability and there are no references, failing WP:N. SpinningSpark 09:00, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was speedy delete. A7 Tone 21:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply The Adventures of Robloxian Hearts
non-notable youtube creations - fails WP:N. Ironholds ( talk) 08:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was speedy delete, no showing of minimal importance and obvious advertising to boot: solutions company established ... to develop and manage web sites that help customer to communicate there message, products and services to potential clients and existing customers - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 16:58, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply Www.beonline.ws
completely non-notable company/website - fails WP:ORG Ironholds ( talk) 08:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 04:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Desert state
This article is based entirely on its assertion that a desert state is comprised of at least 50% desert. However, there is nothing to support this - nor could I find anything. Therefore, the whole thing appears to fail WP:V. I42 ( talk) 07:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. — Jake Wartenberg 04:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Holly Bodimeade
fails WP:ENT , simply appearing in a notable TV show does not guarantee notability. hardly any indepth coverage of this actress. [33]. LibStar ( talk) 07:42, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 05:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Mistreat (band)
Totally fails WP:MUSIC; no coverage in independent, third-party reliable sources... all that can be found are the likes of Myspace, Last.fm, forums, and entertainingly, Stormfront. No releases even on notable indie labels, no significant tours, not even a website. There is a claim to notability ("the best known RAC band in Finland") hence me bringing it here rather than slapping a speedy on it, but without a source, this is just spam. Blackmetalbaz ( talk) 07:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Bhakti Vikasa SwamiAfDs for this article:
Non notable swami - primary sources article. was already deleted and AfD is on record, no other publications since. All recently added references do not refer or support notability. Has to be deleted and redirected to ISKCON. Wikid as© 07:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Additional criteria for notability was membership in Governing Body Commission. Bhakti Vikasa Swami is a swami and initiating guru in ISKCON, which makes him a member of a highly selective small group of religious leaders. I've made some research into the topic. Presently, there're 85 swamis in ISKCON, but only 50 of them are initiating gurus. Being just a swami or an initiating guru in ISKCON doesn't make one notable, but being both at the same time does. More so if one is a member of the Governing Body Commission (which is not the case here). Another opinion expressed in previous AfD debates (with which I tend to agree),
ISKCON leaders can have notability established from ISKCON's sources due to ISKCON's status as a significant, recognized stream of Hinduism in the West and Wikipedia's general practice of permitting use of religious sources to establish the notability of a religion's senior leaders.-- Gaura79 ( talk) 11:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 23:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Cedarpc
Non-notable business, references provided do not satisfy WP:RS. <>Multi-Xfer<> ( talk) 06:55, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Alright, this was my first editorial, so please take it easy on me. I am open to suggestions and willing to listen, so long as the other party is open minded. Fact: CedarPC managed to develop a Multi-Million dollar corporation in the worst recession in what some would say since the great depression; creating new jobs, all while helping young people through apprenticeship and training programs. Sournce - http://static.mgnetwork.com/vab/pdf/fan50.pdf Source - http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/stories/2008/10/20/daily34.html Source - http://www.myskillsource.org/home/documents/EYEProgramFinalReportPresentation2008.NVWIBMeeting.pdf
Why don't you develop a multi-million dollar corporation and win #11 out 50 of the fastest growing companies during this economic crisis, since you see this "every day". Copyright: I asked management at CedarPC for permission to use their logo and trademark for Wikipedia through their "Contact Management", they agreed, and are going to get their corporate attorney to draft a written authorization. If I had put the wrong terms of usage, that can be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anetineer ( talk • contribs) 04:31, 28 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 04:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply David "Yankee Thunder" SniderAfDs for this article:
This article isn't needed until the athlete goes pro. Irbisgreif ( talk) 06:49, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 04:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Terrainian
Non notable neolgism, invented. Talk page says "This word has been added as a protologism" but that is a justification for deletion, not keeping the page. Also nominating:
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 13:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Bill Dawes
no third party reliable sources to attest to his notability Theserialcomma ( talk) 07:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply 5-Hour Energy
The article is written like an advertisement. There is asserted notability, but it is unsourced. All of the sources listed are from the producer, so they can't be used. — Dæ dαlus Contribs 03:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 03:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Being money
Non notable YouTube video. Prod declined without comment. The "reception" section speaks for itself in terms of lack of notability: " over 200 hits as of mid 2009". Delete. Hairhorn ( talk) 03:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that this is a POV fork. NW ( Talk) 01:28, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Evidence of FSB involvement in the Russian apartment bombingsAfDs for this article:
...et cetera, et cetera. Since the material is already present at other articles, and since we already have a valid content fork of Russian apartment bombings ( Theories of Russian apartment bombings) I see absolutely no need for this kind of POV article. Offliner ( talk) 17:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Besides, nothing had changed since the previous AfD discussion of this article (one could read it). Biophys ( talk) 01:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 01:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply National Brick Wall Day
un-notable unofficial holiday Abc518 ( talk) 02:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Speedy Delete G3. Admrboltz ( talk) 13:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply Barry Gibb (drink)
This has no sources and may well be a hoax. It provides no evidence of notability. Grahame ( talk) 01:53, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Staxringold talk contribs 01:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Sir Donough O'Brien, 1st BaronetAfDs for this article:
User creating huge number of unreferenced stubs. No references to establish notability and Baronets are not automatically notable. <>Multi-Xfer<> ( talk) 01:50, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 01:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Jake and the Burtones
In my opinion, this band does not meet the notability criteria. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 01:43, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. Discounting the "per x", it's notable, "not notable", and "number of employees" arguments and the exploratory nomination, we have two editors who maintain that the cited sources confer notability, and one editor, Whpq, who gives a more detailed analysis to the contrary. There is insufficient discussion between these two perspectives to determine consensus, and a third relist would be inappropriate, so I close this now without prejudice against recreation at a later date. Skomorokh 18:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Edudigm
More of advertisement. Might fail WP:N Srikanth ( speak) 06:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Mohammed Shakir
Appears to fail WP:ATHLETE as he hasn't played in a professional league Spiderone ( talk) 16:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 03:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Unreleased Zoids
This is a trivial list of canceled toys with absolutely nothing to verify their existence. TTN ( talk) 16:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect. There is consensus that a standalone article is not justified, the nominator was amenable to a redirect/merge, and the two editors favouring deletion did not indicate why a redirect would be inappropriate, so following Cunard's rationale. Editors are free to take whatever useful material in the history of the redirected article and use it elsewhere if appropriate. Skomorokh 17:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Take the Time
WP:NSONG tells us three things relevant to this nomination. First, "[m]ost songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article." Second, songs must must the requirements of WP:GNG, although placement on "national or significant music charts ... [or winning] significant awards or honors" establishes a presumption of notability. And third, even if a song is notable, it should only be treated in a separate article "when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article...." This song fails to clear that hurdle and should be deleted or merged into Images and Words.
- Simon Dodd { U· T· C· WP:LAW } 18:03, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was merge to Mutant (Marvel Comics). — Jake Wartenberg 04:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Cheyarafim
This fictional race of angel-like mutants has only 94 regular Google hits, zero Google News hits, zero Google Books hits, zero Google Scholar hits and zero notability. Deprodded. Abductive ( reasoning) 23:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Skomorokh 17:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Antonia Donatiello
The only reason of notability appears to be "a lot of prize[s]" which seem actually pretty unheard of and, when googled, return almost only personal pages of people who won them (and in some case, this very article is the first result returned). Goochelaar ( talk) 21:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was speedy delete. A1, apparently not something for article space Tone 21:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply Monobook (skin)
Improper cross-wiki CNR, is not an article and does not point at one. MBisanz talk 01:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 03:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Abutre'sAfDs for this article:
Fails criteria for WP:BLP. This article contains significant negative information about living persons, but only offers one article in Portuguese to verify the long list of allegations against five named persons and the club as a whole (54 chapters, unknown number of people per chapter). There are perhaps 20 news articles found by Google that mention this group, but they are all in Portuguese. The language issue would not normally be grounds for any action because the article could wait for translation help. But this article has remained in a poorly-cited state for three years now. If these accusations of drug dealing, extortion, prostitution and so on are false, how many more years will they remain here damaging the reputations of a sizable number of living people waiting for Portuguese and English speaker come along undo the damage? BLP says "We must get the article right" but even if a skilled translator were to come along, aren't there hundreds of far more important articles about Brazil and Portugal that need attention? It might well be that articles detailing lurid criminality by living people, based solely on non-English sources are beyond the current capabilities of en.Wikipedia. Going into this much depth on topics without any English-language secondary sources might have to wait for a future time when circumstances change, but that would avoid harm to real people, at the cost of an article of very low importance. All the negative information could be deleted, but then what is left to justify notability? The fact that they like to ride black choppers? Dbratland ( talk) 01:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Listed for 27 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Order of Barristers
All that I can find is trivia mentions. Joe Chill ( talk) 21:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete – a non-notable organization per WP:ORG. Jamie S93 20:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Alpha Theta Chi
This article contains details about three distinct organizations: a sorority at Vincennes University, a fraternity at Hope College, and a sorority at the University of Michigan. As far as I can tell, none of the three meet notability criteria outlined at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Peacock ( talk) 20:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 01:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Kalamanthis
This fictional drug has no reliable third party sources available anywhere. The article does not claim that is important within its fictional setting. Deprodded. Abductive ( reasoning) 22:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 03:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply The Best Bad Luck I Ever Had
Contested prod. Book by apparent non-notable author. Only provided refs are to authors homepage and Amazon. <>Multi-Xfer<> ( talk) 22:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was no consensus. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply List of highest paid American television stars
|
edit]] | [[Talk:List of highest paid American television stars | talk]] | [[Special:PageHistory/List of highest paid American television stars | history]] | [[Special:ProtectPage/List of highest paid American television stars | protect]] | [[Special:DeletePage/List of highest paid American television stars | delete]] |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) (
delete) – (
View AfD)
This is an unsourced, trivial list. Logan | Talk 21:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Note to closing admin: While the sourcing for some of the individual salary levels has been greatly improved, there is still virtually no sourcing for the claims that these are the "highest paid" performers. The newspiece which started this whole thing is a feature that runs annually in TV Guide, giving examples of top-level salaries, not a comprehensive analysis. Note, for example, that the "morning" section omits Barbara Walters, verifiably sourced in her Wikipedia article at a much higher salary than all but one of the "top" performers. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz ( talk) 15:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply I have corrected that error, and as i said it can be changed and updated anytime, so it can be helped and make it acpectable for wikipedia, and again as i said with some work this could become a very good artical. -- Pedro J. the rookie 17:06, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply
Checked on Tyra, it is solved and what do you mean with Axed. -- Pedro J. the rookie 19:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply
i see. -- Pedro J. the rookie 19:47, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. One comment normally doesn't constitute a consensus but it did establish that this newspaper exists. No prejudice against a speedy renomination if someone wishes to discuss the subject's notability. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Solosol
I tried to find a source that indicated that this underground Argentine newspaper ever existed, but failed. It only lasted for one year, until the founder left his country. Bringing to AfD in case somebody has better luck than me. Abductive ( reasoning) 21:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment Not going to give an opinion on notability, but I found this interview with Gustavo Aguerre, the claimed founder of the magazine. It is in German, but it has a picture of the front cover of the magazine thus verifying the existence of both Gustav and the magazine. The article says there were four issues and a circulation of 4000. I don't know how notable that is for an underground magazine but four issues does not sound very many to me. SpinningSpark 12:02, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Implementing DGG's suggestion.. NW ( Talk) 01:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Tens System
Is this term standard?? None of the first 30 results in Google meet both of the following criteria:
|
The result was keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. I personally would suggest a redirect until the marriage but that's an editorial decision. ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:10, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Jonas Bergström
Unreferenced BLP, fiance of a princess. How is he notable? Lara 20:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was keep. Staxringold talk contribs 00:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Girl and the Sea
Fails WP:MUSIC Crotchety Old Man ( talk) 19:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was redirect to Pussycat Dolls Present: Girlicious. Staxringold talk contribs 00:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply Carrie JonesAfDs for this article:
Fails WP:MUSICBIO. There are no reliable sources. SilkTork * YES! 00:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was delete. NW ( Talk) 01:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply Angels of Modern Destruction
fails WP:MUSIC Ironholds ( talk) 19:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|
The result was Speedy close as a test page. John Vandenberg ( chat) 06:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC) reply Running and ski brand
Subject is adequately covered by Karhu Sports and Karhu articles. PhilKnight ( talk) 21:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC) reply
|