|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please avoid edit comments such as this [1] and this [2]
Nomoskedasticity you have twice restored controversial content to the article Douglas_Murray_(author) in the last few days without gaining consensus or even discussing in the talk page. If you recall, we discussed this before, albeit some time ago: /info/en/?search=Talk:Douglas_Murray_(author)/Archive_6#Eurabia_and_Great_Replacement_Conspiracy_Theorists_categories
See WP:BLPRESTORE: "When material about living persons has been deleted on good-faith BLP objections, any editor wishing to add, restore, or undelete it must ensure it complies with Wikipedia's content policies. If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first."
Can I suggest that you look at WP:BLP and familiarise yourself with the policies governing biographical articles of living people? Thank you. FirstPrimeOfApophis ( talk) 19:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your repeated restoration of contentious material without discussion. The thread is
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Nomoskedasticity_and_Douglas_Murray. Thank you.
FirstPrimeOfApophis (
talk) 18:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please avoid edit comments such as this [1] and this [2]
Nomoskedasticity you have twice restored controversial content to the article Douglas_Murray_(author) in the last few days without gaining consensus or even discussing in the talk page. If you recall, we discussed this before, albeit some time ago: /info/en/?search=Talk:Douglas_Murray_(author)/Archive_6#Eurabia_and_Great_Replacement_Conspiracy_Theorists_categories
See WP:BLPRESTORE: "When material about living persons has been deleted on good-faith BLP objections, any editor wishing to add, restore, or undelete it must ensure it complies with Wikipedia's content policies. If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first."
Can I suggest that you look at WP:BLP and familiarise yourself with the policies governing biographical articles of living people? Thank you. FirstPrimeOfApophis ( talk) 19:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your repeated restoration of contentious material without discussion. The thread is
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Nomoskedasticity_and_Douglas_Murray. Thank you.
FirstPrimeOfApophis (
talk) 18:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)