Thanks for uploading File:Man stars-Lunan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 22:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:HalDuncanInk.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 03:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi McMarcoP. I am randomly messaging a few users listed at [[Category:User_it-N]] in the hope of getting input into a disagreement on the OR noticeboard regarding the use of an Italian language source. The basic question is whether a particular source can or cannot be used to support particular article content. Users currently involved in the discussion (me included) do not have a high level of proficiency in Italian, so a little help would be appreciated. If you have the time to spare, thanks in advance and the discussion is here: Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher.-- FormerIP ( talk) 22:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch ( talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC) |
I notice your intense interest in DL with numerous substantial edits. Greetings. Two suggestions.
1. In regards to the potential fact that Sighthill was a regular solstice and summer fair site, the sentence as written now uses the citations as direct support. However:
1A) the K Herald quoted DL, and this is not the same as establishing its historicity directly, or even serving as an opinion independent of the subject of the BLP. That is, the citation does confirm that DL said it, but the K Herald author did not arrive at a position on the issue of historicity itself. I apologize for this pedantry, but the distinction, while small, is nonetheless only fair to reflect in WP if we are to be NPOV. I propose that the sentence be modified to something that reflects the degree of evidence within that K Herald source, namely something that confirms that DL said this but that doesn't itself arrive at a position on historicity.
1B) The problem with the G Herald citation used to support the same sentence is that the header abstract that the G Herald makes available simply is totally inadequate due to severe truncation of content. I am not an abrupt editor and I would be loath to remove the citation, but I respectfully wonder if you could consult the source and see whether it does in fact quote DL or on the other hand take an affirmative stance independent of his viewpoint that the site has a confirmed historical usage? If so, please provide me a courtesy academic quotation accurately reflecting the sources punctuation (quotation marks may be the key tipping variable) that allows a fair NPOV assessment of the level of evidence.
1C) The http://www.sighthillstonecircle.net/briefhistory.asp web site does include a written quote from DL on the matter, but is framed as "In later research, I found that summer solstice fairs had been held on the Summerhill, from which the midsummer Sun rises over the true Sighthill, until they were stopped by the church in the 17th century." It doesn't come across as the focus of the article or anything like its main interest which is much more to do with the interesting technicalities of how the site was initially selected and with his work at correcting issues of astronomical alignment and so forth. In any case, the rules of WP (with which I am not in complete stellar alignment but with which I try to see my way to fully accommodate without selling my soul) would speak to this self-written piece as "non-citable" in the BLP if used to characterize the BLP personality... but see below...
In the interests of arriving at a solution, I offer a first proposal on this matter, as follows. "Lunan has written that the clear sightline to the sky and a fine view of the city center met the project's objectives. He has reported subsequent personal research that disclosed that midsummer bonfires were lit and solstice fairs were held on this location until the 17th century when these historical activities were banned by religious institutions. article ref 7 and 38." Sentence 2 is supported by the K Herald quote. The G Herald cite would be discretionary, dependent on its actual content (unless contradictory!) The first sentence is a gentle paraphrase of his message, is not a direct quotation, and is not presented as such, but does mirror how he introduced the matter. It can be could be fairly supported by citing ( http://www.sighthillstonecircle.net/briefhistory.asp ) and I think is permissible as a reference to the contents of an author's corpus, rather than as a personal characterization of the BLP subject himself. While it is a matter of opinion and discretion as to what is and what is not allowable in terms of "proximity" of sourcing in a BLP I think this is quite reasonable under any standard.
2. Actually why don't we get the easy one out of the way first? Then perhaps we can work out my second tendentious question.
3. Oh, and in the grand scheme, can we gradually work to get these ugly monster boxes off the top of this article?
Respectfuly FeatherPluma ( talk) 20:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. As a Italian-speaking WikiGnome, I'd like to solicit your help in testing a new tool. For a few years now, the Red Link Recovery Project has been using the Red Link Recovery Live tool to track down and fix unnecessarily red links in articles. Recently, the tool has been expanded to work on non-English Wikipedias. A small set of suggested fixes for red-links on the Italian-language Wikipedia have been prepared and I'm hoping to interest some Italian-language speakers (such as yourself) to work through them.
If you are interested, please visit http://toolserver.org/~tb/RLRL/quick.php?lang=it. Each time you refresh the page you'll be presented with three new suggested fixes. I'll be happy to answer any questions on the tools talk page. - TB ( talk) 20:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello McMarcoP! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Thanks for uploading File:Devil&DeathDuncan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 18:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo2 rugbymania.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ghost club logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, McMarcoP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:DB - Strange Light.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, McMarcoP. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, McMarcoP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:DB Drawing room 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Salavat (
talk) 03:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Man stars-Lunan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 22:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:HalDuncanInk.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse ( talk) 03:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi McMarcoP. I am randomly messaging a few users listed at [[Category:User_it-N]] in the hope of getting input into a disagreement on the OR noticeboard regarding the use of an Italian language source. The basic question is whether a particular source can or cannot be used to support particular article content. Users currently involved in the discussion (me included) do not have a high level of proficiency in Italian, so a little help would be appreciated. If you have the time to spare, thanks in advance and the discussion is here: Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher.-- FormerIP ( talk) 22:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We need you! | |
---|---|
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch ( talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC) |
I notice your intense interest in DL with numerous substantial edits. Greetings. Two suggestions.
1. In regards to the potential fact that Sighthill was a regular solstice and summer fair site, the sentence as written now uses the citations as direct support. However:
1A) the K Herald quoted DL, and this is not the same as establishing its historicity directly, or even serving as an opinion independent of the subject of the BLP. That is, the citation does confirm that DL said it, but the K Herald author did not arrive at a position on the issue of historicity itself. I apologize for this pedantry, but the distinction, while small, is nonetheless only fair to reflect in WP if we are to be NPOV. I propose that the sentence be modified to something that reflects the degree of evidence within that K Herald source, namely something that confirms that DL said this but that doesn't itself arrive at a position on historicity.
1B) The problem with the G Herald citation used to support the same sentence is that the header abstract that the G Herald makes available simply is totally inadequate due to severe truncation of content. I am not an abrupt editor and I would be loath to remove the citation, but I respectfully wonder if you could consult the source and see whether it does in fact quote DL or on the other hand take an affirmative stance independent of his viewpoint that the site has a confirmed historical usage? If so, please provide me a courtesy academic quotation accurately reflecting the sources punctuation (quotation marks may be the key tipping variable) that allows a fair NPOV assessment of the level of evidence.
1C) The http://www.sighthillstonecircle.net/briefhistory.asp web site does include a written quote from DL on the matter, but is framed as "In later research, I found that summer solstice fairs had been held on the Summerhill, from which the midsummer Sun rises over the true Sighthill, until they were stopped by the church in the 17th century." It doesn't come across as the focus of the article or anything like its main interest which is much more to do with the interesting technicalities of how the site was initially selected and with his work at correcting issues of astronomical alignment and so forth. In any case, the rules of WP (with which I am not in complete stellar alignment but with which I try to see my way to fully accommodate without selling my soul) would speak to this self-written piece as "non-citable" in the BLP if used to characterize the BLP personality... but see below...
In the interests of arriving at a solution, I offer a first proposal on this matter, as follows. "Lunan has written that the clear sightline to the sky and a fine view of the city center met the project's objectives. He has reported subsequent personal research that disclosed that midsummer bonfires were lit and solstice fairs were held on this location until the 17th century when these historical activities were banned by religious institutions. article ref 7 and 38." Sentence 2 is supported by the K Herald quote. The G Herald cite would be discretionary, dependent on its actual content (unless contradictory!) The first sentence is a gentle paraphrase of his message, is not a direct quotation, and is not presented as such, but does mirror how he introduced the matter. It can be could be fairly supported by citing ( http://www.sighthillstonecircle.net/briefhistory.asp ) and I think is permissible as a reference to the contents of an author's corpus, rather than as a personal characterization of the BLP subject himself. While it is a matter of opinion and discretion as to what is and what is not allowable in terms of "proximity" of sourcing in a BLP I think this is quite reasonable under any standard.
2. Actually why don't we get the easy one out of the way first? Then perhaps we can work out my second tendentious question.
3. Oh, and in the grand scheme, can we gradually work to get these ugly monster boxes off the top of this article?
Respectfuly FeatherPluma ( talk) 20:03, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello. As a Italian-speaking WikiGnome, I'd like to solicit your help in testing a new tool. For a few years now, the Red Link Recovery Project has been using the Red Link Recovery Live tool to track down and fix unnecessarily red links in articles. Recently, the tool has been expanded to work on non-English Wikipedias. A small set of suggested fixes for red-links on the Italian-language Wikipedia have been prepared and I'm hoping to interest some Italian-language speakers (such as yourself) to work through them.
If you are interested, please visit http://toolserver.org/~tb/RLRL/quick.php?lang=it. Each time you refresh the page you'll be presented with three new suggested fixes. I'll be happy to answer any questions on the tools talk page. - TB ( talk) 20:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello McMarcoP! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Thanks for uploading File:Devil&DeathDuncan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 18:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo2 rugbymania.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:45, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ghost club logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, McMarcoP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:DB - Strange Light.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:30, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, McMarcoP. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, McMarcoP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:DB Drawing room 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Salavat (
talk) 03:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)