|
|
|
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 1 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pamela Nadell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American historian Pamela Nadell traced the origins of the first agitations for a female rabbi to a short story published in 1889? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pamela Nadell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Pamela Nadell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Your work at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Women and Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red is truly inspiring. Thank you for your amazing work on Wikipedia. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 04:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I was wondering if you could give your informed opinion on Heida Reed and its suitability for AfD? I think it fails WP:NACTOR since her only major role in a notable production was in Poldark (2015 TV series), not multiple major roles. She's dabbled in a lot of stuff, but hasn't been in the industry that long and the lack of importance of her roles and the productions themselves seems like it's hard to make the case she has made "prolific" contributions to the field of entertainment. Could you please tell me what you think about this? I would just like to avoid trouble at AfD with an ill-suited nom. Thank you for any help you can provide! Newshunter12 ( talk) 18:22, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
On 13 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anna B. Eckstein, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Anna Eckstein (pictured) dressed in white and collected six million signatures to promote world peace before the First World War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anna B. Eckstein. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Anna B. Eckstein), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello RebeccaGreen. Just wanted to check about this award. What am I missing in the OBE announcement for this person? https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3294787 Thanks for your dilligence! Lightburst ( talk) 12:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
2019 (UTC)
The editors had no discussion about this. Perhaps undo and discuss? Another editor has questions as do I. Lightburst ( talk) 23:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I saw the AfD for Caroline_Ford_(medical_researcher) was closed as keep, and I wanted to drop by to apologize! I asked a question about some sources, you delivered, and then the AfD totally slipped my mind. I just wanted to say thanks for posting those excerpts and for your excellent work cleaning up the article! Sorry for being unresponsive. Sadly I've not been able to spend as much time on the site this week as I would like. I hope all is well! Happy editing! Ajpolino ( talk) 21:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, it is a violation of WP:BLP to connect an individual to a caste or tribal group unless they have self-identified as a member of that group. There is some background on this at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. - Sitush ( talk) 17:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
On 22 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article New Portuguese Letters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the Three Marias published New Portuguese Letters as a direct challenge to Portuguese censors, they were arrested and the book was banned, leading to international protests? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/New Portuguese Letters. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, New Portuguese Letters), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
women in culture and politics
Thank you for quality articles about women and their work, such as Lorna Dixon, May Hollinworth and New Portuguese Letters, for rescueing articles "time and time again", for help with (hook) wording, all with a focus on collaboration, for quoting "We can!", - Rebecca, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2273 of Precious, a prize of QAI. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
cyrfaw ( talk) 17:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
On 26 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jessie Coles Grayson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Jessie Grayson played Mrs. Higbee in Cass Timberlane, it was the first time an African-American had been addressed on screen by the honorific " Mrs."? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jessie Coles Grayson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Jessie Coles Grayson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
How can you say that a lack of sources is an invalid reason for deletion when an article can't be written unless there are sources? Articles come from sources. No sources, no articles. Explain it to me.
–
Vmavanti (
talk) 16:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
It's currently {{timeonly|GMT-UK}} where I live
, and which displays -> "It's currently 08:06 [
refresh where I live". That might be a way of addressing the above complaint. Obviously you'll want to change GMT-UK
to your appropriate timezone (the documentation in
Template:timeonly should explain how) and reword.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 16:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Thanks for supporting my recent albeit unsuccessful RfA. Your support was much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC) |
RebeccaGreen, I wanted to thank you for all the great work you've been doing in reviewing DYK nominations and in improving nominated articles, especially all the older ones.
I do have a request, though: when you cross off reviews and add comments (the comments are strictly optional, and almost no one adds them), please do not include a date with your sig (use three tildes for the name rather than four for name and date). The archive software won't archive until the oldest comment in a section is over seven days old, so each dated comment delays the archiving by at least a week.
These sections have long been designed to need replacing every seven to ten days, if reviewers have been active (and they have been of late); I've just posted a new list of 37 of which only 10 carried over from the previous list.
If you should happen to use a full sig in future, I'll just do what I've done tonight: post the new list, and let someone do a manual archive of the old one over the next day or three. But it's better when the bot archives on its own.
Thanks again, and sorry to bother you like this. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Rescue Barnstar | |
Hi Rebecca, this is to acknowledge the amazing job you've been doing at DYK to rescue problematic nominations, add sources, and rewrite the text and hook. Your reviews are also right on the mark. Keep up the great work! Best, Yoninah ( talk) 17:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you very much, Yoninah! I really appreciate your comments. Cheers, RebeccaGreen ( talk) 16:54, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, this website is considered an unreliable reference by Wikipedia so can't be used to back up dates. Please use the original source quoted by that website for the date, like the ones listed here. Deb ( talk) 11:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
I can't find any mention of her birthdate in the source quoted: [1] I would be grateful if you could double-check. Deb ( talk) 11:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello RebeccaGreen. A few weeks ago (mid-June of this year) I submitted my draft article on American author Grace Dane Mazur for re-review, after revising it and expanding its sources. I noticed that you recently interacted with the draft page in some way - my Wikipedia skills are unfortunately too limited for me to discern what exactly this entailed - so I thought that perhaps you are interested in the article's topic and would be willing to offer me some advice. Is there anything that I can do to get my article re-reviewed, or any changes that I need to make to ensure that it represents a high-quality submission? For the past few months I've been checking, each time I finish reading a book, to see if its author has a Wikipedia page, and Mazur is the first author I've checked who does not have one. This surprised me, since she's a fairly prominent writer, but I took it as an opportunity to try to get my first Wikipedia article. Here is a link to my re-submitted article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Grace_Dane_Mazur Thank you for your time! Solared ( talk) 11:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
On 10 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Winnie Quagliotti, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Winnie Quagliotti protested against the Australian Bicentenary by dressing in a possum-skin cloak and throwing a wattle wreath into the sea at Princes Pier? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Winnie Quagliotti. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Winnie Quagliotti), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to participate at my RfA. Actually the undersells what you did. To take the time and care to find those diffs and put them in context is an honor. I hope that my actions as an administrator reward your faith and I look forward to seeing you around AfD or some book related article again soon. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
I can see you have removed speedy deletion template from Draft:Naomi Briscow. This page was already being deleted previously by administrators and this is being revived again with same content? I want to ask reason why you removed template?— Harshil want to talk? 11:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi RebeecaGreen - thanks for your feedback!
When I first submitting Joan Livingstone for review, I wrote just a few sentences and did not provide enough references. I am hopeful that there are enough references now that it may be accepted after a re-review.
I am sure that I can find publications by others about Livingstone (I have access to the American Craft Council and The Textile Center of MN libraries, both amazing). I may not be able to make it to those places very soon. I would be happy also to coordinate looking up other things for Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Drafts in addition to Livingstone! -- Hmacke ( talk) 18:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for your work adding references to Jascha Silberstein. Would you care to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jascha Silberstein (2nd nomination)? Toddst1 ( talk) 15:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
On 5 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ruth Doggett, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a review of the London Group's 1936 exhibition noted that many works seemed "perverse and downright silly", but those by Ruth Doggett (portrait pictured) formed "welcome oases of sense and sensibility"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Doggett. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ruth Doggett), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
On 7 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Diahann Carroll, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 13:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
On 9 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Margaret Barr (choreographer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martha Graham–trained choreographer Margaret Barr created more than 80 works (example pictured), inspired by subjects such as Mahatma Gandhi, Margaret Mead, drought, and the Melbourne Cup? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Barr (choreographer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Margaret Barr (choreographer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the article, and I hope that the image will "sell" it to an audience worthy to mention in the stats, - who cares about the hook when there's a good image? Is there a word such as unsnappy ;) - I promise many links to Graham, and if you want links to a subject, make it the first link - next time. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
I am a new editor and tried my hand at fixing up Laura Myntti's article as I am interested in modern art. I followed the guideleines carefully and did my best to remove promotional content that was in the article. I used Laura's LinkedIn to get sources but some were obviously not correct. I didn't expect the torrent of criticism, especially from ThatMontrealIP. I noticed that you were more sympathetic to her cause and have made changes to the article. From what I have investigated she is notable and worthy of an article without any warning notes. I have researched that Alexa B. Kim is the current Program Manager at Self Help Graphics & Art. Alexa has assisted in the development and coordination of the ever growing volunteer program that is integral to the success of the many of Self Help's cultural programs. Are you able to comment further on the Deletes page?
Bzcons44 ( talk) 01:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Rebecca
I note that the Laura Myntti article has escaped deletion but still waits editing in order to remove the warnings associated with the article. This was my first attempt at creating an article and chose Laura Myntti due my interest in modern art. I just thought that she deserved an article as she has had quite a few works on show. It just seems to me that another women artist is being bypassed. As a senior editor would you like to work on this article to meet the criteria expressed in the warnings? I have no personal connection with Laura even though this is implied - I am purely interested in furthering my editing experience and I enjoy modern art.
Bzcons44 ( talk) 07:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
On 14 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ali Curung, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Australian Aboriginal community of Ali Curung is named after a nearby ancestral dingo site? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ali Curung. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ali Curung), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 08:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
On 24 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Marieke Vervoort, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your contributions in checking every minute detail in Eagle Woman as described here [2] by GreenMeansGo. I appreciate your amazing efforts in improving this article! Clovermoss ( talk) 00:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
The Original Barnstar | ||
Hi, RebeccaGreen! This is just to show my appreciation for your amazing work with reviewing the DYK nomination of Toki Pona. I haven't had time to thank you as the nomination has already been closed and one of the hooks has been moved to Prep area. Thus, thank you for the thorough review with many constructive comments and edits. My admiration goes to you also for your tireless contributions to other articles! Ddrahoslav ( talk) 16:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you very much, Ddrahoslav! It was a pleasure. It was promoted to a set very quickly - it will be interesting to see how many views it gets :-) Cheers, RebeccaGreen ( talk) 01:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
... with thanks from QAI |
... for article work in October, and specifically for the rescue of DYK nominations by better hooks, references and use of the sources in the articles. The cabal is grateful, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thanks for your help with Ellie Morrison! -- evrik ( talk) 18:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, I would like to bring to your attention that, a page move is requested by me to rename 2020 ICC T20 World Cup to 2020 ICC Men's T20 World Cup as later is the official name by ICC and also the logo of the tournament specifically display the later name which is also used in the article, secondly, both the tournament is going to take place at the same country and also same year and also the ICC Women's T20 World Cup will be before men's tournament. Thirdly, to bring disambiguity to the name of both tournament. And also the parent page ICC T20 World Cup consistency. I would like to have your insight and comment at the move discussion, if only you like to. Thank you. Dey subrata ( talk) 21:48, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
On 31 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joshua Guerrero, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American tenor Joshua Guerrero stepped in at late notice to sing Almaviva in a Grammy Award-winning production of The Ghosts of Versailles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joshua Guerrero. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Joshua Guerrero), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Have you thought about running for admin? We could use more admin help at DYK. -- valereee ( talk) 12:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for thinking about Márta Kurtág (failed ITN, but now DYK)! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:55, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Margaret Barr (Q21536433). Since you had some involvement with the Margaret Barr (Q21536433) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk) 03:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I appreciate your contributions! I see your hard work and appreciate it. Lightburst ( talk) 00:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you very much, Lightburst, that's lovely! RebeccaGreen ( talk) 10:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
On 6 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yvette Lundy, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thryduulf ( talk) 07:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
On 10 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Nabaneeta Dev Sen, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Kees08 (Talk) 16:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, I agree that the post-mortem source might be a case of WP:CIRCULAR despite it being from a reliable news agency, Indian Express. And instead of undoing you could have restored the previous version with that specific edit summary since my edit was just a good faith cosmetic change. I'd have been notified regardless since the article is on my watchlist. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
On 13 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kieran Modra, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 14:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep up the good work.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 14:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Thank you for adding so many sources to this draft. DannyS712 ( talk) 10:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you for improvements to Göring. I'm not sure about how far we should go in descriptions of roles in singers' articles. I'd think people familiar with the works know, and others could look up the opera. The Ring is among the best-known stage works there is, - would we tell readers that Wotan (Odin) is a god? And what does it really help in the bio of a singer? - Just musing, I won't revert. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi RebeccaGreen. I think this is the right place to do this (it's the first time I've tried to do this): I wanted to say thank you very much for all the work you put into expanding the Monica Allanach article. You managed to find citations and details I had no idea even existed. You're a star, and I'm slightly in awe of you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokingduck ( talk • contribs) 22:09, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the DYK, since this will take time, I will respond in a day or two. DBig Xrayᗙ 16:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC) |
Hi Rebecca! Question: On the Anoosha Syed help you gave me, are you saying that I SHOULD add author names, etc. to references or did you already do so? Thanks so much, -- Caterpillar84 ( talk) 16:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I nominated it for deletion and you cancelled it - thanks for putting in good sources! Article looks better and better cited. QueensanditsCrazy ( talk) 15:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
FYi , you have inadvertently double !voted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Sjardijn (2nd nomination). ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 19:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
... finally appeared today, - thank you for participating in finding the best hook, "... to listen to the music at the end" which would be a good motto ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ― Buster7 ☎ 08:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst ( talk) 22:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC) |
Sweet Brown Snail by
Jason Rhoades and
Paul McCarthy
|
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Thank you for all your edits and contributions this year.
Wishing you a happy holiday! ThatMontrealIP ( talk) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ |
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはRebeccaGreenたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P 02:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello RebeccaGreen: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 15:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Can you please take a look at the article, when you can. An editor says there are grammar issues. I am sure they wont survive with a sweep from your eyes. This will help to resolve the issue since it is nominated on the wP:ITNC -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 15:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
RebeccaGreen,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 06:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
– 2020 is a
leap year –
news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (
#0F4C81), Pantone's
2020 Color of the year
– North America 1000 21:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I just wanted to show my appreciation for sorting out that PROD at Elizabeth Terry. I haven't been active recently, and I appreciate it. Miyagawa ( talk) 09:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC) |
For saving Nancy Malloy from a slow death in draftspace by expanding it and finding quality references, have a cookie! Keep up the good work. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 21:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC) |
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have changed the link to Ian Wooldridge that you created in Paul Birchard, as you didn’t intend the sports journalist.
The theatre director does merit an article, and I have created a first embryonic draft in User:Jim Craigie/Ian Wooldridge (director) which I’d be delighted if you would like to add to. My strategy is to create new articles in user space away from the Wikipedia deletion zealots until they are sufficiently complete, but I’m very happy for constructive contributions to any of my drafts.
Recently I have been renovating the article on Ron Donachie and cannot find dates or references for many of his theatre performances. If you can help with any of these I’d be grateful.
Jim Craigie ( talk) 14:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
I heard this user RebeccaGreen has been died due to COVID-19 in UK. Sorry for hear. RIP. Pikachu887 ( talk) 06:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
One year! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Please check this out article Daisy the Great. It is up for deletion. Davidgoodheart ( talk) 23:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Recipients of the Nicolau Lobato Order has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I was about to nominate
Helen Marlais for deletion when I saw that you contested a PROD of it back in 2019, stating I see reviews of the books she has edited and CDs she has recorded, in the journals Clavier Companion, AmericanMusicTeacher, American Record Guide and Fanfare: The Magazine for Serious Record Collectors. It may be worth considering whether she meets either WP:NARTIST or WP:NAUTHOR when I have added the works and the reviews of them to the article.
These reviews didn't end up being added to the article in the end, and I can't find any of them online. Would you still like to add these or otherwise try to improve the article?
Lennart97 (
talk) 16:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Victuallers ( talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
|
|
|
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 1 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pamela Nadell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American historian Pamela Nadell traced the origins of the first agitations for a female rabbi to a short story published in 1889? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pamela Nadell. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Pamela Nadell), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:01, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Your work at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Women and Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red is truly inspiring. Thank you for your amazing work on Wikipedia. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 04:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, I was wondering if you could give your informed opinion on Heida Reed and its suitability for AfD? I think it fails WP:NACTOR since her only major role in a notable production was in Poldark (2015 TV series), not multiple major roles. She's dabbled in a lot of stuff, but hasn't been in the industry that long and the lack of importance of her roles and the productions themselves seems like it's hard to make the case she has made "prolific" contributions to the field of entertainment. Could you please tell me what you think about this? I would just like to avoid trouble at AfD with an ill-suited nom. Thank you for any help you can provide! Newshunter12 ( talk) 18:22, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
On 13 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anna B. Eckstein, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Anna Eckstein (pictured) dressed in white and collected six million signatures to promote world peace before the First World War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anna B. Eckstein. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Anna B. Eckstein), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:02, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello RebeccaGreen. Just wanted to check about this award. What am I missing in the OBE announcement for this person? https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3294787 Thanks for your dilligence! Lightburst ( talk) 12:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
2019 (UTC)
The editors had no discussion about this. Perhaps undo and discuss? Another editor has questions as do I. Lightburst ( talk) 23:19, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Hello! I saw the AfD for Caroline_Ford_(medical_researcher) was closed as keep, and I wanted to drop by to apologize! I asked a question about some sources, you delivered, and then the AfD totally slipped my mind. I just wanted to say thanks for posting those excerpts and for your excellent work cleaning up the article! Sorry for being unresponsive. Sadly I've not been able to spend as much time on the site this week as I would like. I hope all is well! Happy editing! Ajpolino ( talk) 21:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi, it is a violation of WP:BLP to connect an individual to a caste or tribal group unless they have self-identified as a member of that group. There is some background on this at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. - Sitush ( talk) 17:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
On 22 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article New Portuguese Letters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the Three Marias published New Portuguese Letters as a direct challenge to Portuguese censors, they were arrested and the book was banned, leading to international protests? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/New Portuguese Letters. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, New Portuguese Letters), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
women in culture and politics
Thank you for quality articles about women and their work, such as Lorna Dixon, May Hollinworth and New Portuguese Letters, for rescueing articles "time and time again", for help with (hook) wording, all with a focus on collaboration, for quoting "We can!", - Rebecca, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2273 of Precious, a prize of QAI. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
cyrfaw ( talk) 17:14, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
On 26 August 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jessie Coles Grayson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Jessie Grayson played Mrs. Higbee in Cass Timberlane, it was the first time an African-American had been addressed on screen by the honorific " Mrs."? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jessie Coles Grayson. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Jessie Coles Grayson), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 12:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
How can you say that a lack of sources is an invalid reason for deletion when an article can't be written unless there are sources? Articles come from sources. No sources, no articles. Explain it to me.
–
Vmavanti (
talk) 16:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
It's currently {{timeonly|GMT-UK}} where I live
, and which displays -> "It's currently 08:06 [
refresh where I live". That might be a way of addressing the above complaint. Obviously you'll want to change GMT-UK
to your appropriate timezone (the documentation in
Template:timeonly should explain how) and reword.
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont) 16:36, 8 October 2019 (UTC)Thanks for supporting my recent albeit unsuccessful RfA. Your support was much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC) |
RebeccaGreen, I wanted to thank you for all the great work you've been doing in reviewing DYK nominations and in improving nominated articles, especially all the older ones.
I do have a request, though: when you cross off reviews and add comments (the comments are strictly optional, and almost no one adds them), please do not include a date with your sig (use three tildes for the name rather than four for name and date). The archive software won't archive until the oldest comment in a section is over seven days old, so each dated comment delays the archiving by at least a week.
These sections have long been designed to need replacing every seven to ten days, if reviewers have been active (and they have been of late); I've just posted a new list of 37 of which only 10 carried over from the previous list.
If you should happen to use a full sig in future, I'll just do what I've done tonight: post the new list, and let someone do a manual archive of the old one over the next day or three. But it's better when the bot archives on its own.
Thanks again, and sorry to bother you like this. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Rescue Barnstar | |
Hi Rebecca, this is to acknowledge the amazing job you've been doing at DYK to rescue problematic nominations, add sources, and rewrite the text and hook. Your reviews are also right on the mark. Keep up the great work! Best, Yoninah ( talk) 17:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you very much, Yoninah! I really appreciate your comments. Cheers, RebeccaGreen ( talk) 16:54, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, this website is considered an unreliable reference by Wikipedia so can't be used to back up dates. Please use the original source quoted by that website for the date, like the ones listed here. Deb ( talk) 11:21, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
I can't find any mention of her birthdate in the source quoted: [1] I would be grateful if you could double-check. Deb ( talk) 11:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello RebeccaGreen. A few weeks ago (mid-June of this year) I submitted my draft article on American author Grace Dane Mazur for re-review, after revising it and expanding its sources. I noticed that you recently interacted with the draft page in some way - my Wikipedia skills are unfortunately too limited for me to discern what exactly this entailed - so I thought that perhaps you are interested in the article's topic and would be willing to offer me some advice. Is there anything that I can do to get my article re-reviewed, or any changes that I need to make to ensure that it represents a high-quality submission? For the past few months I've been checking, each time I finish reading a book, to see if its author has a Wikipedia page, and Mazur is the first author I've checked who does not have one. This surprised me, since she's a fairly prominent writer, but I took it as an opportunity to try to get my first Wikipedia article. Here is a link to my re-submitted article: /info/en/?search=Draft:Grace_Dane_Mazur Thank you for your time! Solared ( talk) 11:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
On 10 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Winnie Quagliotti, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Winnie Quagliotti protested against the Australian Bicentenary by dressing in a possum-skin cloak and throwing a wattle wreath into the sea at Princes Pier? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Winnie Quagliotti. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Winnie Quagliotti), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 12:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to participate at my RfA. Actually the undersells what you did. To take the time and care to find those diffs and put them in context is an honor. I hope that my actions as an administrator reward your faith and I look forward to seeing you around AfD or some book related article again soon. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 02:17, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
I can see you have removed speedy deletion template from Draft:Naomi Briscow. This page was already being deleted previously by administrators and this is being revived again with same content? I want to ask reason why you removed template?— Harshil want to talk? 11:49, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi RebeecaGreen - thanks for your feedback!
When I first submitting Joan Livingstone for review, I wrote just a few sentences and did not provide enough references. I am hopeful that there are enough references now that it may be accepted after a re-review.
I am sure that I can find publications by others about Livingstone (I have access to the American Craft Council and The Textile Center of MN libraries, both amazing). I may not be able to make it to those places very soon. I would be happy also to coordinate looking up other things for Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Drafts in addition to Livingstone! -- Hmacke ( talk) 18:39, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for your work adding references to Jascha Silberstein. Would you care to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jascha Silberstein (2nd nomination)? Toddst1 ( talk) 15:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
On 5 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ruth Doggett, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a review of the London Group's 1936 exhibition noted that many works seemed "perverse and downright silly", but those by Ruth Doggett (portrait pictured) formed "welcome oases of sense and sensibility"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ruth Doggett. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ruth Doggett), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:02, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
On 7 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Diahann Carroll, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 13:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
On 9 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Margaret Barr (choreographer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martha Graham–trained choreographer Margaret Barr created more than 80 works (example pictured), inspired by subjects such as Mahatma Gandhi, Margaret Mead, drought, and the Melbourne Cup? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Barr (choreographer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Margaret Barr (choreographer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the article, and I hope that the image will "sell" it to an audience worthy to mention in the stats, - who cares about the hook when there's a good image? Is there a word such as unsnappy ;) - I promise many links to Graham, and if you want links to a subject, make it the first link - next time. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
I am a new editor and tried my hand at fixing up Laura Myntti's article as I am interested in modern art. I followed the guideleines carefully and did my best to remove promotional content that was in the article. I used Laura's LinkedIn to get sources but some were obviously not correct. I didn't expect the torrent of criticism, especially from ThatMontrealIP. I noticed that you were more sympathetic to her cause and have made changes to the article. From what I have investigated she is notable and worthy of an article without any warning notes. I have researched that Alexa B. Kim is the current Program Manager at Self Help Graphics & Art. Alexa has assisted in the development and coordination of the ever growing volunteer program that is integral to the success of the many of Self Help's cultural programs. Are you able to comment further on the Deletes page?
Bzcons44 ( talk) 01:40, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi Rebecca
I note that the Laura Myntti article has escaped deletion but still waits editing in order to remove the warnings associated with the article. This was my first attempt at creating an article and chose Laura Myntti due my interest in modern art. I just thought that she deserved an article as she has had quite a few works on show. It just seems to me that another women artist is being bypassed. As a senior editor would you like to work on this article to meet the criteria expressed in the warnings? I have no personal connection with Laura even though this is implied - I am purely interested in furthering my editing experience and I enjoy modern art.
Bzcons44 ( talk) 07:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
On 14 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ali Curung, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Australian Aboriginal community of Ali Curung is named after a nearby ancestral dingo site? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ali Curung. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Ali Curung), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 08:52, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
On 24 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Marieke Vervoort, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:06, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For your contributions in checking every minute detail in Eagle Woman as described here [2] by GreenMeansGo. I appreciate your amazing efforts in improving this article! Clovermoss ( talk) 00:30, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
The Original Barnstar | ||
Hi, RebeccaGreen! This is just to show my appreciation for your amazing work with reviewing the DYK nomination of Toki Pona. I haven't had time to thank you as the nomination has already been closed and one of the hooks has been moved to Prep area. Thus, thank you for the thorough review with many constructive comments and edits. My admiration goes to you also for your tireless contributions to other articles! Ddrahoslav ( talk) 16:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you very much, Ddrahoslav! It was a pleasure. It was promoted to a set very quickly - it will be interesting to see how many views it gets :-) Cheers, RebeccaGreen ( talk) 01:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
... with thanks from QAI |
... for article work in October, and specifically for the rescue of DYK nominations by better hooks, references and use of the sources in the articles. The cabal is grateful, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thanks for your help with Ellie Morrison! -- evrik ( talk) 18:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, I would like to bring to your attention that, a page move is requested by me to rename 2020 ICC T20 World Cup to 2020 ICC Men's T20 World Cup as later is the official name by ICC and also the logo of the tournament specifically display the later name which is also used in the article, secondly, both the tournament is going to take place at the same country and also same year and also the ICC Women's T20 World Cup will be before men's tournament. Thirdly, to bring disambiguity to the name of both tournament. And also the parent page ICC T20 World Cup consistency. I would like to have your insight and comment at the move discussion, if only you like to. Thank you. Dey subrata ( talk) 21:48, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
On 31 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joshua Guerrero, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American tenor Joshua Guerrero stepped in at late notice to sing Almaviva in a Grammy Award-winning production of The Ghosts of Versailles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joshua Guerrero. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Joshua Guerrero), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
valereee ( talk) 00:02, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Have you thought about running for admin? We could use more admin help at DYK. -- valereee ( talk) 12:31, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for thinking about Márta Kurtág (failed ITN, but now DYK)! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:55, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Margaret Barr (Q21536433). Since you had some involvement with the Margaret Barr (Q21536433) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk) 03:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
I appreciate your contributions! I see your hard work and appreciate it. Lightburst ( talk) 00:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you very much, Lightburst, that's lovely! RebeccaGreen ( talk) 10:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
On 6 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yvette Lundy, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thryduulf ( talk) 07:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
On 10 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Nabaneeta Dev Sen, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Kees08 (Talk) 16:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, I agree that the post-mortem source might be a case of WP:CIRCULAR despite it being from a reliable news agency, Indian Express. And instead of undoing you could have restored the previous version with that specific edit summary since my edit was just a good faith cosmetic change. I'd have been notified regardless since the article is on my watchlist. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
On 13 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kieran Modra, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 14:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Keep up the good work.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk) 14:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
The Citation Barnstar | |
Thank you for adding so many sources to this draft. DannyS712 ( talk) 10:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you for improvements to Göring. I'm not sure about how far we should go in descriptions of roles in singers' articles. I'd think people familiar with the works know, and others could look up the opera. The Ring is among the best-known stage works there is, - would we tell readers that Wotan (Odin) is a god? And what does it really help in the bio of a singer? - Just musing, I won't revert. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:08, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi RebeccaGreen. I think this is the right place to do this (it's the first time I've tried to do this): I wanted to say thank you very much for all the work you put into expanding the Monica Allanach article. You managed to find citations and details I had no idea even existed. You're a star, and I'm slightly in awe of you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokingduck ( talk • contribs) 22:09, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the DYK, since this will take time, I will respond in a day or two. DBig Xrayᗙ 16:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC) |
Hi Rebecca! Question: On the Anoosha Syed help you gave me, are you saying that I SHOULD add author names, etc. to references or did you already do so? Thanks so much, -- Caterpillar84 ( talk) 16:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I nominated it for deletion and you cancelled it - thanks for putting in good sources! Article looks better and better cited. QueensanditsCrazy ( talk) 15:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
FYi , you have inadvertently double !voted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Sjardijn (2nd nomination). ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 19:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
... finally appeared today, - thank you for participating in finding the best hook, "... to listen to the music at the end" which would be a good motto ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:29, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ― Buster7 ☎ 08:06, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for continuing to make Wikipedia the greatest project in the world. I hope you have an excellent holiday season. Lightburst ( talk) 22:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC) |
Sweet Brown Snail by
Jason Rhoades and
Paul McCarthy
|
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Thank you for all your edits and contributions this year.
Wishing you a happy holiday! ThatMontrealIP ( talk) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ |
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
この
ミラ
PはRebeccaGreenたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます!
フレフレ、みんなの未来!/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラ
P 02:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Hello RebeccaGreen: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 15:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Can you please take a look at the article, when you can. An editor says there are grammar issues. I am sure they wont survive with a sweep from your eyes. This will help to resolve the issue since it is nominated on the wP:ITNC -- Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBig Xrayᗙ 15:37, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
RebeccaGreen,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
CAPTAIN RAJU
(T) 06:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
– 2020 is a
leap year –
news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (
#0F4C81), Pantone's
2020 Color of the year
– North America 1000 21:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I just wanted to show my appreciation for sorting out that PROD at Elizabeth Terry. I haven't been active recently, and I appreciate it. Miyagawa ( talk) 09:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC) |
For saving Nancy Malloy from a slow death in draftspace by expanding it and finding quality references, have a cookie! Keep up the good work. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 21:32, 5 February 2020 (UTC) |
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have changed the link to Ian Wooldridge that you created in Paul Birchard, as you didn’t intend the sports journalist.
The theatre director does merit an article, and I have created a first embryonic draft in User:Jim Craigie/Ian Wooldridge (director) which I’d be delighted if you would like to add to. My strategy is to create new articles in user space away from the Wikipedia deletion zealots until they are sufficiently complete, but I’m very happy for constructive contributions to any of my drafts.
Recently I have been renovating the article on Ron Donachie and cannot find dates or references for many of his theatre performances. If you can help with any of these I’d be grateful.
Jim Craigie ( talk) 14:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
I heard this user RebeccaGreen has been died due to COVID-19 in UK. Sorry for hear. RIP. Pikachu887 ( talk) 06:52, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
One year! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:59, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Please check this out article Daisy the Great. It is up for deletion. Davidgoodheart ( talk) 23:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Recipients of the Nicolau Lobato Order has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I was about to nominate
Helen Marlais for deletion when I saw that you contested a PROD of it back in 2019, stating I see reviews of the books she has edited and CDs she has recorded, in the journals Clavier Companion, AmericanMusicTeacher, American Record Guide and Fanfare: The Magazine for Serious Record Collectors. It may be worth considering whether she meets either WP:NARTIST or WP:NAUTHOR when I have added the works and the reviews of them to the article.
These reviews didn't end up being added to the article in the end, and I can't find any of them online. Would you still like to add these or otherwise try to improve the article?
Lennart97 (
talk) 16:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Two years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
-- Innisfree987 ( talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Victuallers ( talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
-- Lajmmoore ( talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging