#1day1woman Index: 
2022 
2021 
2020 
2019 
2018 
2017

Welcome to WikiProject Women in Red (WiR)! Our objective is to turn red links into blue ones. Our project's scope is women's representation on all language Wikipedias (biographies, women's works, women's issues, broadly construed). Did you know that, according to Humaniki, only 19.81% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women? Not impressed? Content gender gap is a form of systemic bias, and this is what WiR addresses. We invite you to participate, whenever you like, in whatever way suits you and your schedule. Editors of all genders are equally and warmly welcome at Women in Red!

#1day1woman initiative

Women in Red has an initiative for all our participants who are interested in creating or improving articles on women and their works outside the specific focus of our monthly editathons. We have called it #1day1woman as the label can be used worldwide on the social media, creating new trends of interest. Perfectionists might like to create a new article each and every day but one new article on any one day will be the starting point. The approach provides an opportunity for our members and all other participants to create or improve articles on women who are notable in any field of endeavor.

• The virtual edit-a-thon allows enthusiasts from around the globe to participate in the work.

• The lists of redlinks should provide inspiration.
• There is a section where you can list the articles you create this month, and another section where you can add the images you uploaded to Commons.
• This essay on creating women's biographies and our Ten Simple Rules might be helpful to newcomers.

• The main goals of the event are:

• to encourage inexperienced editors and show them how they can contribute to Wikipedia by creating biographies of some of the world's most prominent women
• to draw the attention of more experienced editors to the need for concerted action on a specific area
• to support Wikipedia in combating the systemic bias against the coverage of women and women's works
• to promote the new/improved articles and images through social media

• Women in Red worklists
• Add other red links here, if possible with a source:

Every person on this list of new members of the National Academy of Medicine meets WP:PROF. There are numerous women researchers here without articles! [1] Thsmi002 ( talk) 17:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC) reply

• Authority control should be included at the foot of every biography: {{Authority control}}. It will remain hidden until relevant identifiers have been added to Wikidata.
• Choose applicable Categories including relevant subcategories of Category:Women.
• If applicable, add a stub template at the foot of an article:{{stub}}.

• {{WikiProject Biography| }} or {{WikiProject Biography}}
• {{WikiProject Women}} if born after 1950; or {{WikiProject Women's History}}:: if born before 1950.
• Editathon banner: either {{WIR-108}} or {{WIR-00-2019}}
• {{Image requested|people}}, if it needs a photograph

We use social media to promote our work. If you mention a Woman in Red article on social media, please indicate below using one or more of the abbreviations.

• Twitter (TW): @wikiwomeninred
• Instagram (INSTA): @wikiwomeninred
• Pinterest (PIN): Editathons
• Facebook (FB): Wiki Women in Red
• Hashtags: #1day1woman and #wikiwomeninred

• Happy 18th birthday, Wikipedia. Let’s celebrate the Internet’s good grown-up. mentions WiR in particular as well as the founders Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight and Roger Bamkin.
• History has a massive gender bias. We'll settle for fixing Wikipedia by Monica Hesse in the Washington Post, February 17

• Invitation: #1day1woman
• Editathon banner for talk pages: either Template:WIR-108: {{WIR-108}} or Template:WIR-00-2019 {{WIR-00-2019}} will work