Please Help, Please stop this erasure of all my work and my life on wiki. This is madness. I am being wiki-abused! For The attacks on my account are vandalism. I am upset and angered by the approach Wikipedia editors are taking by making such horribly defaming statements and actions by banishing my account on the grounds of a sock puppet. I am not; have never been a sock puppet. this is a total misunderstanding. The reality is that Sand Error, Jill is my Husband and shares an IP Address with User: Olivettilly because we are married and share 6 lousy computers that all require new heat sync paste and operating system upgrades; they are overthrottled and legacy but it helps us network our harddrives and have a workflow with our music recordings, research papers, accounting docs, emailing video editing, and of course Wikipedia writing. If we are making music or with friends. a lot of sharing computers as we work together too running a non profit architecture research lab. I do not have multiple accounts. I only use this one Olivettilly. My partner saw how much fun Wikipedia writing and researching could be from me nerding out about it and wanted to get one too. That is why he has his account, and both user pages look similar because we wanted to work on a theme together to contribute to Wikipedia, as we are illustrators as well and want to o mo/
This is Olivettilly's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Domina Colette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha ( talk) 21:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, Olivettilly, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have been working on a few biographies. To avoid any problems, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Ewing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Ewing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 20:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Colette Pervette, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 ( talk) 13:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Jade Love Kids Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotion for non notable organisation. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 03:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colette Pervette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colette Pervette until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Colette Pervette, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 13:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)A tag has been placed on User:Olivettilly/wikipetan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Blocked editor's personal version of Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
User:Olivettilly/Books/How To Wiki, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Olivettilly/Books/How To Wiki and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Olivettilly/Books/How To Wiki during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 18:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for uploading File:The Daily Dose Mike D the Monkey.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Please Help, Please stop this erasure of all my work and my life on wiki. This is madness. I am being wiki-abused! For The attacks on my account are vandalism. I am upset and angered by the approach Wikipedia editors are taking by making such horribly defaming statements and actions by banishing my account on the grounds of a sock puppet. I am not; have never been a sock puppet. this is a total misunderstanding. The reality is that Sand Error, Jill is my Husband and shares an IP Address with User: Olivettilly because we are married and share 6 lousy computers that all require new heat sync paste and operating system upgrades; they are overthrottled and legacy but it helps us network our harddrives and have a workflow with our music recordings, research papers, accounting docs, emailing video editing, and of course Wikipedia writing. If we are making music or with friends. a lot of sharing computers as we work together too running a non profit architecture research lab. I do not have multiple accounts. I only use this one Olivettilly. My partner saw how much fun Wikipedia writing and researching could be from me nerding out about it and wanted to get one too. That is why he has his account, and both user pages look similar because we wanted to work on a theme together to contribute to Wikipedia, as we are illustrators as well and want to o mo/
This is Olivettilly's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Domina Colette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha ( talk) 21:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, Olivettilly, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have been working on a few biographies. To avoid any problems, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!-- Ipigott ( talk) 08:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Ewing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Ewing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 20:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Colette Pervette, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 ( talk) 13:24, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
The article Jade Love Kids Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotion for non notable organisation. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 03:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colette Pervette is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colette Pervette until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. duffbeerforme ( talk) 03:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Colette Pervette, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Atlantic306 ( talk) 20:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 13:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)A tag has been placed on User:Olivettilly/wikipetan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Blocked editor's personal version of Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
User:Olivettilly/Books/How To Wiki, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Olivettilly/Books/How To Wiki and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Olivettilly/Books/How To Wiki during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 18:55, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
-- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--
Megalibrarygirl (
talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
-- Megalibrarygirl ( talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Thanks for uploading File:The Daily Dose Mike D the Monkey.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:17, 21 April 2024 (UTC)