![]() |
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The only source I can find covering ILCA in any substantial detail is the article from Nintendo Life, and even the information there is ostensibly based upon what the company says about itself (e.g. a huge chunk of the text is a verbatim press release, another huge chunk is a tweet from the company, and every picture of their office used in the article was taken by the company). While they assisted with notable games such as Yakuza 0, etc., and some may see this as a surface-level contributor to notability, the scope of their assistance was clearly limited bordering on negligible. For example, taking a look at the Yakuza 0 credits (skip to 45:00 for the actual mention, but watching them all the way through paints a more telling picture), they're listed among dozens of companies as "Casting Cooperation" with two listed credits for "Producer"; they're effectively a footnote deep into the credits. The sparse sources I can find that even mention this subject's existence do so in relation to the upcoming Pokemon titles. As an example, a Polygon article: "Brilliant Diamond and Shining Pearl are being developed by ILCA, Inc., the studio behind Pokémon Home. ICLA’s Yuichi Ueda and Game Freak’s Junichi Masuda are directing the games." Or The Verge: "Pokémon Home developer Ilca is working on both games alongside Game Freak." And that's it. That's the extent of the coverage in those sources. There's clearly not enough reliable, independent coverage to construct an article to Wikipedia's standards. The fact that the only two reliable sources I can find that even mention what the subject's name stands for ( Nintendo Life and Eurogamer) can't even agree on what that is ("I Love Computer Art" and "I Love Computer Arts", respectively) is the icing on the cake and a pretty telling indicator of the subject's notability. There may be more coverage in Japanese sources that could bring the subject in line with notability guidelines, but that's outside of my wheelhouse, and what WP:BEFORE I did conduct in Japanese (using the term "ポケットモンスター ILCA" ["Pocket Monsters ILCA" in English]) showed little promise, for example this article from Engadget.
TL;DR: This is, as best I can tell, a cut-and-dry case of WP:TOOSOON. For those curious, this is the article for the company on the Japanese Wikipedia. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 05:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
After reading your argument for the deletion of my article, I may have to agree. While working on two Pokémon games, the studio isn't very notable outside of this and has received little media attention. I agree that this article may be deleted and if I wish to recreate the article in the future, I will wait until it has worked on more notable projects to a more important degree. VideoGameMovie 9:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VideoGameMovie ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability for this relatively minor incident. The refs are not mainstream sources and even they find little to say and what they do say is rather too closely parroted by the article. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 23:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Similiar to the scenario in the 1960–61 UE Lleida season, I can't see how this article would pass WP:GNG. HawkAussie ( talk) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable actor/producer. Could not find any RS about him. Natg 19 ( talk) 23:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:33, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Cannot find any RS about him. Natg 19 ( talk) 23:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable actor/singer-songwriter. Has not produced any notable music, or appeared in a main role in any films or TV series. Natg 19 ( talk) 23:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I can't find anything to suggest that Holm can meet WP:GNG. There is no significant coverage in this article and I'm not finding anything better in searches. I found a transfer rumour, a transfer announcement and a brief announcement from her club about her leaving. This is WP:ROUTINE and does not count as significant in-depth coverage.
Players could get presumed notability through WP:SPORTCRIT if they have played in a major international competition at the highest level, but Holm hasn't played in the European Championship, nor the World Championship nor the Olympics. There is no evidence that she is a significantly notable figure within handball. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
This falls under Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal. This could easily be covered in other articles. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Groupe PSA. Spartaz Humbug! 16:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Because of WP:OR: There is no new Company Stellantis France S.A., PSA is merged into FCA N.V. an after it FCA N.V. is renamed to Stelantis N.V. See:
194.166.199.118 ( talk) 15:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm concerned that this might not pass WP:NORG, in particular WP:ORGCRIT, which requires significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. In a WP:BEFORE search, I found two sources, Patna Daily and Techstory where there is an actual author and it isn't just a blatant press release written by Utthan themselves. I'm still not convinced that this meets the high bar at NORG and even the two links above look like they might be promotional/sponsored.
Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The page is applied for Deleting for adding external links which are linking to promotional contents. Now, the admin has removed the promotional/sponsored links to any other external links. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
VENKATESHafx (
talk •
contribs)
12:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
2019-11 ✍️ create
The result was speedy keep. WP:SKCRIT#4: Nomination by a blocked sockpuppet. (non-admin closure) Java Hurricane 15:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. No single source cited Jenyire2 20:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
I do not see the basis of notability here. Many small newspaper items, but nothing substantial or comprehensive--and based on the reported accomplishments, no reason why there ought to be. Owner of various non-notable business, and a bureaucrat in the sports industry. DGG ( talk ) 00:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Source analysis is compelling Spartaz Humbug! 16:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
A working stuntman, but meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 12:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment - Well, it is quite detailed and has a lot of references. Other similar stuntman like Max Faulkner and Terry Walsh have been on here for years and don't have sources. Likewise, there are a number of actors, sometimes minor ( Laurence Harrington, Brian Grellis, Tom Kelly) who have pages and have been on here for a number of years with no sources. Maybe we should bring this lot in for questioning... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:D884:6401:E9CC:2EBD:8A38:E727 ( talk) 10:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep - He is known to Whovians in the Doctor Who universe. Has also worked in many other franchises such as The Avengers so probably gives him cult status from these areas too. Not to mention, he played a well-known French singer (who he bore a strong resemblance to). The Krays connection is interesting but doesn't make him notable. The fact he also worked taught kung fu and martial arts, as well as being a taxi driver shows he had a varied career. Despite rarely being credited, surely it meets at least one criteria? WP:GNG? WP:ENT? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:D884:6401:8C6B:8E92:2C17:9473 ( talk) 10:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to use them if you think they will help the article. There could be more references out there which people could add to help keep the page. 2A00:23C6:D884:6401:7D9A:6C56:5A21:4CA9 ( talk) 11:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
References
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
BBC Genome | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Shannon Sullivan | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
BBC | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Dr Who Magazine (August 1989) | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
Dr Who magazine (September 1989) | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
The Avengers TV | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Stunting in the Cinema | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Man, Myth & Magic | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Movie Dude | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Aveleyman | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Jewish Chronicle (1970) | ![]() |
![]() |
? Search only shows one line from newspaper, but seems to be routine. No evidence of significant coverage demonstrated | ? Unknown |
ShutterStock | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
British Comedy Guide | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
New Canadian Film | ![]() |
? | ? Any mention is not visible in search results | ? Unknown |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Note: It'd be a shame if the page was deleted. Hopefully, it won't come to that. What lessons can we learn if articles are created for other stuntmen like
Marc Boyle,
Steve Emerson,
Ken Barker,
Nick Hobbs,
Gareth Milne...? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A00:23C6:D884:6401:B594:B0D3:2334:E07 (
talk)
10:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Source: Maybe not much of a source but a brief interview on page 37 of TV Zone, June 1995 where he talks about working as a taxi driver and being one of the first people in Britain to practise karate.
Ah, heck! Why don't we let things stand. Other articles have been on here for donkey's with the same similar sources so this really isn't any different. 2A00:23C6:D884:6401:9503:6B1B:AC14:FE8D ( talk) 12:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Despite a couple of gos no policy based argument for keeping has emerged Spartaz Humbug! 16:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Subject is a mixed martial arts fighter. Fails WP:NMMA for not having at least 3 fights in top tier promotion (UFC) and fail GNG for content of of fights is random sport report. Cassiopeia( talk) 02:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
I disagree with the suggestion that this page should be deleted. O'Neill had an extremely impressed UFC debut and that view has been echoed by many main stream media outlets like UFC.com and Bloody Elbow. Clearly she is going to have at least one more UFC fight after this performance and in all likelihood will have many UFC fights in her career. Notability is no longer an issue as she's fought for the biggest company in the world. User:Litmus123 02:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.155.190.251 ( talk)
~~~~
).
Cassiopeia(
talk)
03:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)The result was delete. Weak delete is still delete Eddie891 Talk Work 22:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
PR, notability lacking, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 19:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
PR, advertisement, CV, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 19:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
PR, notability suspect, CV-like, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 19:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if it's relevant here, but I actually didn't receive any money for the creation of this article, which is accurately depicted on my user page Jacobmcpherson ( talk) 19:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Payan has never played in a game that would give a presumption of notability under WP:NFOOTBALL and I'm not seeing any coverage with enough depth for WP:GNG. A Turkish search brings up nothing better than an U17 squad list, a friendly tournament squad list and another passing mention, this time in Habervan. There is clear consensus among the Wikipedia community that passing mentions in squad lists do not add up to passing GNG. Also, the player appears to have retired a few years ago and so future notability looks unlikely. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. I can find no coverage of this person whatsoever. Lennart97 ( talk) 19:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Musician does not yet meet notability criteria. The sources provided are blogs and interviews about an " up and coming artist" - the usual vehicles for getting the word out. ... discospinster talk 19:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 18:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
This is an article about a film maker that lacks the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability. The sources are very poor. At the time of nomination, the sources are:
The best claim for notability are the two film festival awards. There is a claim that his "movie NIGHTINGALE IN A MUSIC BOX won the Jury Prize for Outstanding Screenplay at The Slamdance 2004 Film Festival" but the best information I could find was very brief article which states the film was given a "jury honor". The Slam Dance Festival press release announced the top ten screenplays ( [5], [6]) but Nightingale is not one of those. He did win best director at Shriekfest. However, neither that award or the Slam Dance Festival jury honor attracted anythign in the way of coverage. Whpq ( talk) 18:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
2021-03 ✍️ create
, 2017-02 ✗
G12
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 03:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Pretty sure this fails WP:NPOET, a search revealed nothing. Noah 💬 18:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a broadcaster and environmentalist, not reliably sourced as passing our inclusion standards for broadcasters or environmentalists. As always, people are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's technically verifiable that they exist -- the notability test is not "she has a job", but "she has received reliable source coverage from the media about her work in the job in order to establish its significance". But the references here aren't reliable sources for the purposes of establishing notability: two are her own "staff" profiles on the self-published websites of organizations she's directly affiliated with, one is her IMDb profile, one is a directory entry in a political information database that maintains a profile of every single candidate in every election in the United States regardless of whether the role they were elected to passes our notability rules for politicians or not; one is her own company's proprietary YouTube channel; one is a newspaper article that just glancingly namechecks her existence in the process of not being about her; and one is impossible to verify what it is as leads to a database login screen rather than any actual content. Again, notability is not a question of using primary sources to verify that her work exists -- it's a question of using reliable and independent sources to verify that her work has been externally deemed significant by people without a vested interest in her career, but absolutely none of these seven footnotes are doing that at all. Bearcat ( talk) 18:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
A very interesting one as this is the worst case of WP:ADMASQ & WP:COATRACK I’ve encountered in a long while. This has all the tale signs of covert UPE. The subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A WP:BEFORE shows this & this which are both sponsored posts as expressly stated. The subject of the article merely wants a Wikipedia presence. Celestina007 ( talk) 17:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
non-notable journalist, probably eligible for g4 but an SPA insists on removing the tag. There is 0 coverage that would allow for a standalone article on this person. CUPIDICAE💕 17:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Leidos. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 03:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Could not find sourcing indicative of notability, a before search for "MANDRIL" "tactical data links" pulled up very little; one book, no newspapers.com results, no reliable sources on my library database, etc. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Notability issue, also content was created by paid editor who has since been blocked for flouting rules. Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 17:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I looked at this Wikipedia:Notability (music) and didn't see any guidelines for producers? Maybe worth exploring as sometimes their notability is found beyond surface level information. Does Wikipedia have a way of pulling data from institutions like the Grammy's? Jacobmcpherson ( talk) 12:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 04:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
The only sourcing here is a search parameter for his papers and a link to the website of an organization he headed. Just because a university has someone's papers and created a short bio connected with their papers, does not automatically make them notable. The link to his company website does not even work. A google search turned up a linkedIn listing and that was about it. Nothing indicates that he meets notability for acdemics, which is the normal way psychiatrists are found to be notable, nor for GNG, nor any other criteria as far as I can tell. The other way some psychiatrists achieve notability is as writers, but I see no evidence Mr. Menninger has ever written anything, let alone something that would propel him towards notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Yixing clay teapot. However, an actual merge is not needed because the creator has already done so here, though some cleanup of the merge is needed. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 04:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Dubious sourcing for this topic. A lone book (about which I can find very little), and then some unclear website which repeats the book and then makes unverifiable claims. Can perhaps be draftified if people see potential in this. Fram ( talk) 16:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was Wiktionary redirect. Clear consensus not to retain a Wikipedia article. Softly redirecting to Wiktionary ensures that readers still find the definition in the appropriate place. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Not notable at all. Noah 💬 16:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced article about a television film, not making or reliably sourcing any discernible claim to passing our notability criteria for either films or television shows. As always, every film that exists is not always guaranteed a Wikipedia article just because film directories like IMDb technically verify that it exists -- the notability test for films requires evidence of their significance, such as notable film or television awards and/or the reception of a WP:GNG-worthy volume of critical attention from established professional film or television critics. But there's no evidence that this film passes either of those tests, so it isn't entitled to a presumption of notability in the absence of any notability-building sources. Bearcat ( talk) 16:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:AUTOBIO (creator = "Jhreno") of a film and television director, not making or
reliably sourcing any claim to passing our notability criteria for filmmakers. People are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work is technically verified by an IMDb profile; the notability test for filmmakers is not just that their work exists, but requires concrete evidence of their significance, such as critical analysis of their work by recognized film or television critics in real media.
But there's none of that here, and even the four bluelinked titles in his filmography aren't helping: The Hunger is a TV series (not even properly sourced as notable at all) for which he directed one single episode; False Pretenses exists solely as a redirect to the most famous actress in it rather than an article establishing its notability as a film; Deadly Betrayal has a completely unreferenced article that fails to establish its notability at all; and while Poison Ivy: The Secret Society is probably notable, its article fails to actually demonstrate that with good references, and even its potential notability has far more to do with being one film in a franchise series than with the fact that Jason Hreno directed it per se. All of which means that nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from actually having to have any
WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about him.
In actual fact, I would have speedied this for not even making a claim of notability at all, but it's been flying under the radar for over a decade in this state, and I don't feel comfortable speedying an article that's been around that long.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
completely non-notable company sourced to blackhat SEO and press releases. No meaningful coverage in any reliable source. CUPIDICAE💕 14:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Admin be aware. Some of these comments seem to be from sockpuppets. Why do I say that? Because this article started as a stub, I see, and it could be asked to be improved or expanded. This article never was given a chance to be improved. It was just nominated for deletion with no second chance. I also find it weird, very weird, that the same Admin and user who asked for the nomination of deletion of this article also nominated for deletion the Spanish version of this article. Sharelovenothate ( talk) 22:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I just find it weird. I am NOT saying that I am right. Lastly, I'll leave this here:
"Before nominating a recently created article, please consider that many good articles started their Wikilife in pretty bad shape. Unless it is obviously a hopeless case, consider sharing your reservations with the article creator, mentioning your concerns on the article's discussion page, and/or adding a "cleanup" template, instead of bringing the article to AfD." According to Wikipedia guidelines.
Sharelovenothate (
talk)
22:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A WP:BEFORE only showed passing mentions of the company in connection to games it worked on. Since the company does not produce original games, just provides support or port development, a navigation list on grounds of being a "creative force" makes little sense. IceWelder [ ✉] 13:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
*Don't delete. Though the company doesn't meet the notability guidelines the article is still able to remain as more people will be able to discover the developer. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
TriforceTropical (
talk •
contribs)
14:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 18:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Most of the article is a copy-paste from
https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=VarApp%7Creference=1Jo.1 and
https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=VarApp%7Creference=1John.4&options=GNHVU, e.g. ἡμῶν] (our) – א, B, L, Ψ, 049, 69, 88, 181, 322, 326, 436, 1067, 1175, 1241, 1409, pm, Lect, itar, itp, itt(pt),, itz, vgww, vgst, copsa, geo, Ps-Oecumeniuscomm, Theophylactcomm, TRStephens 1550, WH
is on STEP Bible ἡμῶν] א B L Ψ 049 69 88 181 322 326 436 1067 1175 1241 1409 pm Lect itar itp itt(pt) itz vgww vgst copsa geo Ps-Oecumeniuscomm Theophylactcomm ςStephanus WH NRtext CEI Rivtext TILC Nv NM
. I do not think we should have a WP article which duplicates another website. And before one may argue that the page is to be kept because it is an important topic, I will say that almost no one works on Christianity related topics on WP so the hope of seeing the radical improvements needed are null. I add that there is already a section
Textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament#First_Epistle_of_John, and I note that it has the exact same problem for it has the exact same text.
Veverve (
talk)
13:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. ... discospinster talk 13:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NFOOTBALL according to Soccerway, Tribuna and Besoccer. In my searches, I could only find trivial coverage in Utusan and Metro which is not significant enough for WP:GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
The subject doesn't meet the general notability guidelines as she hasn't received significant independent coverage. There's one human interest story in the town paper [11]. The other links are a promotional interview and examples of modelling work. – Thjarkur (talk) 07:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 18:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Have you seen
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cilame railway station? It was deleted because not notable enough to have an article itself. And we have to concur that the whole state of the Javanese railroad articles is pretty poor
according to
Mangoe (
talk ·
contribs)
And we inform you that in Indonesian Wikipedia, I (RaFaDa20631, formerly Alqhaderi Aliffianiko) have pointed about special and unusual notability standards for Indonesian railway stations, dealing with small stations:
Hint: use {{ Train Stations in Indonesia}} to find what the station's name is notable or significant enough. RaFaDa20631 ( talk) 07:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
BLP does not meet WP:NBIO- coverage is mostly WP:PASSING mentions in the context of the Tracktion and JUCE software programs. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 07:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. None of the sources listed can establish notability, and the vast majority of the are primary sources. Mottezen ( talk) 17:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Manan (disambiguation). However, both pages will need to be swapped so that the disambiguation page does not have the disambiguation modifier since there are no primary topic. There are also no opposition to moving the redirect to Manan (name) so it will also be performed. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 05:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The category Hindu philosophical concepts appears to be an error, since the proper word (according to the article itself) is "manana". Once the edit history is expunged, there are plenty of people with the given name or surname, as well as a handful of places. Clarityfiend ( talk) 22:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Keep arguments are not adding up to a gng pass and sngs cannot overcome poor sourcing in a blp. No objection ifvsomeone wants to put a redirect in Spartaz Humbug! 16:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
All prior XfDs for this page:
|
Non-notable rapper who has already been the subject of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emiway Bantai. I haven’t seen the deleted article and so am not tagging this for G4 (but maybe an admin can compare them). However, this article does not indicate that the subject has become notable in the past two years. This article was submitted to AFC for review twice, and was declined twice, the first time for lack of notability and for reading like an advertisement. The second time I declined it as not meeting any of the musical notability criteria, and because of the previous deletion discussion. It was then moved from draft space to article space anyway. It still doesn’t satisfy musical notability. Naïve Google search shows that the subject exists and makes extensive use of social media. We guessed that. Article has been reference-bombed with a mixture of possibly reliable sources and unreliable sources. A well-sourced BLP of a performer who does not meet notability criteria is still a BLP of a non-notable performer. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I can't see coverage in independent sources. The source present are also not accessible. It may nor fulfill WP:GNG. Heba Aisha ( talk) 06:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: As per WP:UNIN, all colleges are de facto notable. We can also use college website to improve the article. - AppuduPappudu ( talk) 16:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Currently in the Saudi 2nd division, previously at most in the Brazilian 4th division. Nehme 1499 05:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 14:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. The most I've found is this article which, in my opinion, is not enough. Nehme 1499 05:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet the relevant notability guidelines. None of the criteria in the guideline for academics are satisfied, and I'm not seeing enough independent (i.e. not associated with her employers) sources to meet WP:GNG/ WP:BIO. The best I can find is interviews in local press, but these appear to be more about local news issues than Koli herself. At this point, it's probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 18:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Incredibly poorly referenced BLP; no significant coverage that I could find. Elli ( talk | contribs) 03:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment a poorly sourced article, in and of itself, is a ridiculous reason to nominate an article for deletion. Simply tag the article for improved sources. If they exist, someone will find them. The issue should be whether or not the subject is wiki worthy. ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 12:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Napa, California. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat ( talk) 05:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable elementary school. Sourcing is all of a local nature which one might expect of any school in the US. Onel5969 TT me 03:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 18:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I cannot find any evidence this was a notable insurance company and it's not mentioned at all at its successor's article ( AARP#Health_insurance). The award it won was its sole claim to notability, and that does not appear to be a notable award, but rather an industry selection.
Opted against PROD as the company's predecessor was brought to and deleted at AfD ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WellMed Medical Management) and felt this deserved discussion as well. StarM 03:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
2009-10 ↻ restored
, 2009-10 ✗
G6
The result was withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Firestar464 ( talk) 10:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
[14] On behalf of another editor. Firestar464 ( talk) 03:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
A working casting director. Apparently her bio says that she received a lifetime achievement award from BFI. However, I can't find anything on the BFI site to corroborate that. In fact, I can't find anything on the BFI site that says that such an award exists, unlike AFI, where there is such an award. That being said, even if such an award exists, that is not enough to establish notability. Onel5969 TT me 01:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was deleted as G5. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 11:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "His Broadway and IMDb credits suggest notability" which clearly indicates the editor didn't check out either, as they are all insignificant roles. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and not enough significant roles to pass WP:NACTOR. Having a prominent role in a single episode of a TV show is not significant. Onel5969 TT me 01:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Connecticut Lakes#Fourth Connecticut Lake. MBisanz talk 18:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm rather surprised to have stumbled across a sixteen-year-old article on a half mile long nature trail with only two primary sources supporting it. Yes, it is unusual for a trail to cross the international border, but does that make it notable? The lack of significant coverage in reliable sources would seem to indicate that the answer is no. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW keep, based on receipt of a significant national award. BD2412 T 04:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I have conducted a pretty substantial WP:BEFORE and found coverage of his words, interviews with him, but nothing that is about him, or is significant coverage, or is in sources that are both independent of him, and reliable. WP:PRIMARY does allow usage of primary sources such as interviews, and WP:SELFPUB is likely to allow his Amazon book / his own words, but each in a restricted manner.
I have come to the conclusion that he is a decent gentleman doing his job well, supported by a prodigious corporate PR department, but that he fails to exhibit any notability aside from his association with the corporation he chairs and was CEO of in the past. Very few CEOs or corporate chairs are inherently and independently notable, and they may not inherit notability from their employer.
Fails WP:BIO Fiddle Faddle 17:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat ( talk) 02:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
No sources cited. Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Passes WP:NMOTORSPORT. Mottezen ( talk) 05:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Notable. Passes WP:NMOTORSPORT and WP:GNG. -- Kemalcan ( talk) 12:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. BD2412 T 04:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Prod was contested saying that the fact this event is two years from now is not a valid reason for deletion. My reasoning for the prod is that I’ve seen many articles for future events deleted and comments saying as the event gets closer the article can be re-created. In fact, just in the past week or two, an article I saw about a 2022 election in, IIRC, a south East Asian country, was deleted for that exact reason. So, my argument is, if why is a sporting event not held to the same standards as a country’s presidential election? ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 22:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The only source I can find covering ILCA in any substantial detail is the article from Nintendo Life, and even the information there is ostensibly based upon what the company says about itself (e.g. a huge chunk of the text is a verbatim press release, another huge chunk is a tweet from the company, and every picture of their office used in the article was taken by the company). While they assisted with notable games such as Yakuza 0, etc., and some may see this as a surface-level contributor to notability, the scope of their assistance was clearly limited bordering on negligible. For example, taking a look at the Yakuza 0 credits (skip to 45:00 for the actual mention, but watching them all the way through paints a more telling picture), they're listed among dozens of companies as "Casting Cooperation" with two listed credits for "Producer"; they're effectively a footnote deep into the credits. The sparse sources I can find that even mention this subject's existence do so in relation to the upcoming Pokemon titles. As an example, a Polygon article: "Brilliant Diamond and Shining Pearl are being developed by ILCA, Inc., the studio behind Pokémon Home. ICLA’s Yuichi Ueda and Game Freak’s Junichi Masuda are directing the games." Or The Verge: "Pokémon Home developer Ilca is working on both games alongside Game Freak." And that's it. That's the extent of the coverage in those sources. There's clearly not enough reliable, independent coverage to construct an article to Wikipedia's standards. The fact that the only two reliable sources I can find that even mention what the subject's name stands for ( Nintendo Life and Eurogamer) can't even agree on what that is ("I Love Computer Art" and "I Love Computer Arts", respectively) is the icing on the cake and a pretty telling indicator of the subject's notability. There may be more coverage in Japanese sources that could bring the subject in line with notability guidelines, but that's outside of my wheelhouse, and what WP:BEFORE I did conduct in Japanese (using the term "ポケットモンスター ILCA" ["Pocket Monsters ILCA" in English]) showed little promise, for example this article from Engadget.
TL;DR: This is, as best I can tell, a cut-and-dry case of WP:TOOSOON. For those curious, this is the article for the company on the Japanese Wikipedia. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 05:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
After reading your argument for the deletion of my article, I may have to agree. While working on two Pokémon games, the studio isn't very notable outside of this and has received little media attention. I agree that this article may be deleted and if I wish to recreate the article in the future, I will wait until it has worked on more notable projects to a more important degree. VideoGameMovie 9:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by VideoGameMovie ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability for this relatively minor incident. The refs are not mainstream sources and even they find little to say and what they do say is rather too closely parroted by the article. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 23:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Similiar to the scenario in the 1960–61 UE Lleida season, I can't see how this article would pass WP:GNG. HawkAussie ( talk) 23:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable actor/producer. Could not find any RS about him. Natg 19 ( talk) 23:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:33, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable actor. Cannot find any RS about him. Natg 19 ( talk) 23:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable actor/singer-songwriter. Has not produced any notable music, or appeared in a main role in any films or TV series. Natg 19 ( talk) 23:06, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I can't find anything to suggest that Holm can meet WP:GNG. There is no significant coverage in this article and I'm not finding anything better in searches. I found a transfer rumour, a transfer announcement and a brief announcement from her club about her leaving. This is WP:ROUTINE and does not count as significant in-depth coverage.
Players could get presumed notability through WP:SPORTCRIT if they have played in a major international competition at the highest level, but Holm hasn't played in the European Championship, nor the World Championship nor the Olympics. There is no evidence that she is a significantly notable figure within handball. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
This falls under Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal. This could easily be covered in other articles. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 22:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Groupe PSA. Spartaz Humbug! 16:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Because of WP:OR: There is no new Company Stellantis France S.A., PSA is merged into FCA N.V. an after it FCA N.V. is renamed to Stelantis N.V. See:
194.166.199.118 ( talk) 15:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm concerned that this might not pass WP:NORG, in particular WP:ORGCRIT, which requires significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. In a WP:BEFORE search, I found two sources, Patna Daily and Techstory where there is an actual author and it isn't just a blatant press release written by Utthan themselves. I'm still not convinced that this meets the high bar at NORG and even the two links above look like they might be promotional/sponsored.
Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The page is applied for Deleting for adding external links which are linking to promotional contents. Now, the admin has removed the promotional/sponsored links to any other external links. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
VENKATESHafx (
talk •
contribs)
12:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
2019-11 ✍️ create
The result was speedy keep. WP:SKCRIT#4: Nomination by a blocked sockpuppet. (non-admin closure) Java Hurricane 15:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. No single source cited Jenyire2 20:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
I do not see the basis of notability here. Many small newspaper items, but nothing substantial or comprehensive--and based on the reported accomplishments, no reason why there ought to be. Owner of various non-notable business, and a bureaucrat in the sports industry. DGG ( talk ) 00:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Source analysis is compelling Spartaz Humbug! 16:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
A working stuntman, but meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 12:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment - Well, it is quite detailed and has a lot of references. Other similar stuntman like Max Faulkner and Terry Walsh have been on here for years and don't have sources. Likewise, there are a number of actors, sometimes minor ( Laurence Harrington, Brian Grellis, Tom Kelly) who have pages and have been on here for a number of years with no sources. Maybe we should bring this lot in for questioning... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:D884:6401:E9CC:2EBD:8A38:E727 ( talk) 10:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep - He is known to Whovians in the Doctor Who universe. Has also worked in many other franchises such as The Avengers so probably gives him cult status from these areas too. Not to mention, he played a well-known French singer (who he bore a strong resemblance to). The Krays connection is interesting but doesn't make him notable. The fact he also worked taught kung fu and martial arts, as well as being a taxi driver shows he had a varied career. Despite rarely being credited, surely it meets at least one criteria? WP:GNG? WP:ENT? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:D884:6401:8C6B:8E92:2C17:9473 ( talk) 10:48, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Feel free to use them if you think they will help the article. There could be more references out there which people could add to help keep the page. 2A00:23C6:D884:6401:7D9A:6C56:5A21:4CA9 ( talk) 11:11, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
References
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
BBC Genome | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Shannon Sullivan | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
BBC | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Dr Who Magazine (August 1989) | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
Dr Who magazine (September 1989) | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
The Avengers TV | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Stunting in the Cinema | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Man, Myth & Magic | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Movie Dude | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Aveleyman | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Jewish Chronicle (1970) | ![]() |
![]() |
? Search only shows one line from newspaper, but seems to be routine. No evidence of significant coverage demonstrated | ? Unknown |
ShutterStock | ![]() |
? | ![]() |
✘ No |
British Comedy Guide | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
New Canadian Film | ![]() |
? | ? Any mention is not visible in search results | ? Unknown |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Note: It'd be a shame if the page was deleted. Hopefully, it won't come to that. What lessons can we learn if articles are created for other stuntmen like
Marc Boyle,
Steve Emerson,
Ken Barker,
Nick Hobbs,
Gareth Milne...? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A00:23C6:D884:6401:B594:B0D3:2334:E07 (
talk)
10:31, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Source: Maybe not much of a source but a brief interview on page 37 of TV Zone, June 1995 where he talks about working as a taxi driver and being one of the first people in Britain to practise karate.
Ah, heck! Why don't we let things stand. Other articles have been on here for donkey's with the same similar sources so this really isn't any different. 2A00:23C6:D884:6401:9503:6B1B:AC14:FE8D ( talk) 12:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Despite a couple of gos no policy based argument for keeping has emerged Spartaz Humbug! 16:29, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Subject is a mixed martial arts fighter. Fails WP:NMMA for not having at least 3 fights in top tier promotion (UFC) and fail GNG for content of of fights is random sport report. Cassiopeia( talk) 02:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
I disagree with the suggestion that this page should be deleted. O'Neill had an extremely impressed UFC debut and that view has been echoed by many main stream media outlets like UFC.com and Bloody Elbow. Clearly she is going to have at least one more UFC fight after this performance and in all likelihood will have many UFC fights in her career. Notability is no longer an issue as she's fought for the biggest company in the world. User:Litmus123 02:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.155.190.251 ( talk)
~~~~
).
Cassiopeia(
talk)
03:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)The result was delete. Weak delete is still delete Eddie891 Talk Work 22:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
PR, notability lacking, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 19:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
PR, advertisement, CV, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 19:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:52, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
PR, notability suspect, CV-like, product of paid editing: see Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 19:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if it's relevant here, but I actually didn't receive any money for the creation of this article, which is accurately depicted on my user page Jacobmcpherson ( talk) 19:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Payan has never played in a game that would give a presumption of notability under WP:NFOOTBALL and I'm not seeing any coverage with enough depth for WP:GNG. A Turkish search brings up nothing better than an U17 squad list, a friendly tournament squad list and another passing mention, this time in Habervan. There is clear consensus among the Wikipedia community that passing mentions in squad lists do not add up to passing GNG. Also, the player appears to have retired a few years ago and so future notability looks unlikely. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. I can find no coverage of this person whatsoever. Lennart97 ( talk) 19:30, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 22:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Musician does not yet meet notability criteria. The sources provided are blogs and interviews about an " up and coming artist" - the usual vehicles for getting the word out. ... discospinster talk 19:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 18:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
This is an article about a film maker that lacks the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to establish notability. The sources are very poor. At the time of nomination, the sources are:
The best claim for notability are the two film festival awards. There is a claim that his "movie NIGHTINGALE IN A MUSIC BOX won the Jury Prize for Outstanding Screenplay at The Slamdance 2004 Film Festival" but the best information I could find was very brief article which states the film was given a "jury honor". The Slam Dance Festival press release announced the top ten screenplays ( [5], [6]) but Nightingale is not one of those. He did win best director at Shriekfest. However, neither that award or the Slam Dance Festival jury honor attracted anythign in the way of coverage. Whpq ( talk) 18:25, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
2021-03 ✍️ create
, 2017-02 ✗
G12
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 03:37, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Pretty sure this fails WP:NPOET, a search revealed nothing. Noah 💬 18:14, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a broadcaster and environmentalist, not reliably sourced as passing our inclusion standards for broadcasters or environmentalists. As always, people are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's technically verifiable that they exist -- the notability test is not "she has a job", but "she has received reliable source coverage from the media about her work in the job in order to establish its significance". But the references here aren't reliable sources for the purposes of establishing notability: two are her own "staff" profiles on the self-published websites of organizations she's directly affiliated with, one is her IMDb profile, one is a directory entry in a political information database that maintains a profile of every single candidate in every election in the United States regardless of whether the role they were elected to passes our notability rules for politicians or not; one is her own company's proprietary YouTube channel; one is a newspaper article that just glancingly namechecks her existence in the process of not being about her; and one is impossible to verify what it is as leads to a database login screen rather than any actual content. Again, notability is not a question of using primary sources to verify that her work exists -- it's a question of using reliable and independent sources to verify that her work has been externally deemed significant by people without a vested interest in her career, but absolutely none of these seven footnotes are doing that at all. Bearcat ( talk) 18:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
A very interesting one as this is the worst case of WP:ADMASQ & WP:COATRACK I’ve encountered in a long while. This has all the tale signs of covert UPE. The subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A WP:BEFORE shows this & this which are both sponsored posts as expressly stated. The subject of the article merely wants a Wikipedia presence. Celestina007 ( talk) 17:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
non-notable journalist, probably eligible for g4 but an SPA insists on removing the tag. There is 0 coverage that would allow for a standalone article on this person. CUPIDICAE💕 17:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Leidos. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 03:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Could not find sourcing indicative of notability, a before search for "MANDRIL" "tactical data links" pulled up very little; one book, no newspapers.com results, no reliable sources on my library database, etc. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Notability issue, also content was created by paid editor who has since been blocked for flouting rules. Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jacobmcpherson_paid_editing Acousmana ( talk) 17:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I looked at this Wikipedia:Notability (music) and didn't see any guidelines for producers? Maybe worth exploring as sometimes their notability is found beyond surface level information. Does Wikipedia have a way of pulling data from institutions like the Grammy's? Jacobmcpherson ( talk) 12:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 04:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
The only sourcing here is a search parameter for his papers and a link to the website of an organization he headed. Just because a university has someone's papers and created a short bio connected with their papers, does not automatically make them notable. The link to his company website does not even work. A google search turned up a linkedIn listing and that was about it. Nothing indicates that he meets notability for acdemics, which is the normal way psychiatrists are found to be notable, nor for GNG, nor any other criteria as far as I can tell. The other way some psychiatrists achieve notability is as writers, but I see no evidence Mr. Menninger has ever written anything, let alone something that would propel him towards notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Yixing clay teapot. However, an actual merge is not needed because the creator has already done so here, though some cleanup of the merge is needed. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 04:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Dubious sourcing for this topic. A lone book (about which I can find very little), and then some unclear website which repeats the book and then makes unverifiable claims. Can perhaps be draftified if people see potential in this. Fram ( talk) 16:39, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was Wiktionary redirect. Clear consensus not to retain a Wikipedia article. Softly redirecting to Wiktionary ensures that readers still find the definition in the appropriate place. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 01:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Not notable at all. Noah 💬 16:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced article about a television film, not making or reliably sourcing any discernible claim to passing our notability criteria for either films or television shows. As always, every film that exists is not always guaranteed a Wikipedia article just because film directories like IMDb technically verify that it exists -- the notability test for films requires evidence of their significance, such as notable film or television awards and/or the reception of a WP:GNG-worthy volume of critical attention from established professional film or television critics. But there's no evidence that this film passes either of those tests, so it isn't entitled to a presumption of notability in the absence of any notability-building sources. Bearcat ( talk) 16:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:00, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:AUTOBIO (creator = "Jhreno") of a film and television director, not making or
reliably sourcing any claim to passing our notability criteria for filmmakers. People are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their work is technically verified by an IMDb profile; the notability test for filmmakers is not just that their work exists, but requires concrete evidence of their significance, such as critical analysis of their work by recognized film or television critics in real media.
But there's none of that here, and even the four bluelinked titles in his filmography aren't helping: The Hunger is a TV series (not even properly sourced as notable at all) for which he directed one single episode; False Pretenses exists solely as a redirect to the most famous actress in it rather than an article establishing its notability as a film; Deadly Betrayal has a completely unreferenced article that fails to establish its notability at all; and while Poison Ivy: The Secret Society is probably notable, its article fails to actually demonstrate that with good references, and even its potential notability has far more to do with being one film in a franchise series than with the fact that Jason Hreno directed it per se. All of which means that nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from actually having to have any
WP:GNG-worthy reliable source coverage about him.
In actual fact, I would have speedied this for not even making a claim of notability at all, but it's been flying under the radar for over a decade in this state, and I don't feel comfortable speedying an article that's been around that long.
Bearcat (
talk)
15:55, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
completely non-notable company sourced to blackhat SEO and press releases. No meaningful coverage in any reliable source. CUPIDICAE💕 14:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Admin be aware. Some of these comments seem to be from sockpuppets. Why do I say that? Because this article started as a stub, I see, and it could be asked to be improved or expanded. This article never was given a chance to be improved. It was just nominated for deletion with no second chance. I also find it weird, very weird, that the same Admin and user who asked for the nomination of deletion of this article also nominated for deletion the Spanish version of this article. Sharelovenothate ( talk) 22:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I just find it weird. I am NOT saying that I am right. Lastly, I'll leave this here:
"Before nominating a recently created article, please consider that many good articles started their Wikilife in pretty bad shape. Unless it is obviously a hopeless case, consider sharing your reservations with the article creator, mentioning your concerns on the article's discussion page, and/or adding a "cleanup" template, instead of bringing the article to AfD." According to Wikipedia guidelines.
Sharelovenothate (
talk)
22:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A WP:BEFORE only showed passing mentions of the company in connection to games it worked on. Since the company does not produce original games, just provides support or port development, a navigation list on grounds of being a "creative force" makes little sense. IceWelder [ ✉] 13:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
*Don't delete. Though the company doesn't meet the notability guidelines the article is still able to remain as more people will be able to discover the developer. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
TriforceTropical (
talk •
contribs)
14:30, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 18:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Most of the article is a copy-paste from
https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=VarApp%7Creference=1Jo.1 and
https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=VarApp%7Creference=1John.4&options=GNHVU, e.g. ἡμῶν] (our) – א, B, L, Ψ, 049, 69, 88, 181, 322, 326, 436, 1067, 1175, 1241, 1409, pm, Lect, itar, itp, itt(pt),, itz, vgww, vgst, copsa, geo, Ps-Oecumeniuscomm, Theophylactcomm, TRStephens 1550, WH
is on STEP Bible ἡμῶν] א B L Ψ 049 69 88 181 322 326 436 1067 1175 1241 1409 pm Lect itar itp itt(pt) itz vgww vgst copsa geo Ps-Oecumeniuscomm Theophylactcomm ςStephanus WH NRtext CEI Rivtext TILC Nv NM
. I do not think we should have a WP article which duplicates another website. And before one may argue that the page is to be kept because it is an important topic, I will say that almost no one works on Christianity related topics on WP so the hope of seeing the radical improvements needed are null. I add that there is already a section
Textual_variants_in_the_New_Testament#First_Epistle_of_John, and I note that it has the exact same problem for it has the exact same text.
Veverve (
talk)
13:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. ... discospinster talk 13:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Subject fails WP:NFOOTBALL according to Soccerway, Tribuna and Besoccer. In my searches, I could only find trivial coverage in Utusan and Metro which is not significant enough for WP:GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 02:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
The subject doesn't meet the general notability guidelines as she hasn't received significant independent coverage. There's one human interest story in the town paper [11]. The other links are a promotional interview and examples of modelling work. – Thjarkur (talk) 07:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 18:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Have you seen
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cilame railway station? It was deleted because not notable enough to have an article itself. And we have to concur that the whole state of the Javanese railroad articles is pretty poor
according to
Mangoe (
talk ·
contribs)
And we inform you that in Indonesian Wikipedia, I (RaFaDa20631, formerly Alqhaderi Aliffianiko) have pointed about special and unusual notability standards for Indonesian railway stations, dealing with small stations:
Hint: use {{ Train Stations in Indonesia}} to find what the station's name is notable or significant enough. RaFaDa20631 ( talk) 07:31, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
BLP does not meet WP:NBIO- coverage is mostly WP:PASSING mentions in the context of the Tracktion and JUCE software programs. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 07:26, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. None of the sources listed can establish notability, and the vast majority of the are primary sources. Mottezen ( talk) 17:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Manan (disambiguation). However, both pages will need to be swapped so that the disambiguation page does not have the disambiguation modifier since there are no primary topic. There are also no opposition to moving the redirect to Manan (name) so it will also be performed. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste ( t, e | c, l) 05:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The category Hindu philosophical concepts appears to be an error, since the proper word (according to the article itself) is "manana". Once the edit history is expunged, there are plenty of people with the given name or surname, as well as a handful of places. Clarityfiend ( talk) 22:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Keep arguments are not adding up to a gng pass and sngs cannot overcome poor sourcing in a blp. No objection ifvsomeone wants to put a redirect in Spartaz Humbug! 16:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
All prior XfDs for this page:
|
Non-notable rapper who has already been the subject of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emiway Bantai. I haven’t seen the deleted article and so am not tagging this for G4 (but maybe an admin can compare them). However, this article does not indicate that the subject has become notable in the past two years. This article was submitted to AFC for review twice, and was declined twice, the first time for lack of notability and for reading like an advertisement. The second time I declined it as not meeting any of the musical notability criteria, and because of the previous deletion discussion. It was then moved from draft space to article space anyway. It still doesn’t satisfy musical notability. Naïve Google search shows that the subject exists and makes extensive use of social media. We guessed that. Article has been reference-bombed with a mixture of possibly reliable sources and unreliable sources. A well-sourced BLP of a performer who does not meet notability criteria is still a BLP of a non-notable performer. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:05, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I can't see coverage in independent sources. The source present are also not accessible. It may nor fulfill WP:GNG. Heba Aisha ( talk) 06:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: As per WP:UNIN, all colleges are de facto notable. We can also use college website to improve the article. - AppuduPappudu ( talk) 16:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Currently in the Saudi 2nd division, previously at most in the Brazilian 4th division. Nehme 1499 05:11, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 14:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. The most I've found is this article which, in my opinion, is not enough. Nehme 1499 05:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet the relevant notability guidelines. None of the criteria in the guideline for academics are satisfied, and I'm not seeing enough independent (i.e. not associated with her employers) sources to meet WP:GNG/ WP:BIO. The best I can find is interviews in local press, but these appear to be more about local news issues than Koli herself. At this point, it's probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 04:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 18:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Incredibly poorly referenced BLP; no significant coverage that I could find. Elli ( talk | contribs) 03:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment a poorly sourced article, in and of itself, is a ridiculous reason to nominate an article for deletion. Simply tag the article for improved sources. If they exist, someone will find them. The issue should be whether or not the subject is wiki worthy. ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 12:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Napa, California. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat ( talk) 05:45, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable elementary school. Sourcing is all of a local nature which one might expect of any school in the US. Onel5969 TT me 03:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. MBisanz talk 18:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I cannot find any evidence this was a notable insurance company and it's not mentioned at all at its successor's article ( AARP#Health_insurance). The award it won was its sole claim to notability, and that does not appear to be a notable award, but rather an industry selection.
Opted against PROD as the company's predecessor was brought to and deleted at AfD ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WellMed Medical Management) and felt this deserved discussion as well. StarM 03:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
2009-10 ↻ restored
, 2009-10 ✗
G6
The result was withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Firestar464 ( talk) 10:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
[14] On behalf of another editor. Firestar464 ( talk) 03:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
A working casting director. Apparently her bio says that she received a lifetime achievement award from BFI. However, I can't find anything on the BFI site to corroborate that. In fact, I can't find anything on the BFI site that says that such an award exists, unlike AFI, where there is such an award. That being said, even if such an award exists, that is not enough to establish notability. Onel5969 TT me 01:47, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was deleted as G5. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 11:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "His Broadway and IMDb credits suggest notability" which clearly indicates the editor didn't check out either, as they are all insignificant roles. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and not enough significant roles to pass WP:NACTOR. Having a prominent role in a single episode of a TV show is not significant. Onel5969 TT me 01:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Connecticut Lakes#Fourth Connecticut Lake. MBisanz talk 18:20, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm rather surprised to have stumbled across a sixteen-year-old article on a half mile long nature trail with only two primary sources supporting it. Yes, it is unusual for a trail to cross the international border, but does that make it notable? The lack of significant coverage in reliable sources would seem to indicate that the answer is no. Beeblebrox ( talk) 01:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW keep, based on receipt of a significant national award. BD2412 T 04:16, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I have conducted a pretty substantial WP:BEFORE and found coverage of his words, interviews with him, but nothing that is about him, or is significant coverage, or is in sources that are both independent of him, and reliable. WP:PRIMARY does allow usage of primary sources such as interviews, and WP:SELFPUB is likely to allow his Amazon book / his own words, but each in a restricted manner.
I have come to the conclusion that he is a decent gentleman doing his job well, supported by a prodigious corporate PR department, but that he fails to exhibit any notability aside from his association with the corporation he chairs and was CEO of in the past. Very few CEOs or corporate chairs are inherently and independently notable, and they may not inherit notability from their employer.
Fails WP:BIO Fiddle Faddle 17:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Devonian Wombat ( talk) 02:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
No sources cited. Fails WP:GNG Jenyire2 20:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Passes WP:NMOTORSPORT. Mottezen ( talk) 05:20, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Notable. Passes WP:NMOTORSPORT and WP:GNG. -- Kemalcan ( talk) 12:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. BD2412 T 04:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Prod was contested saying that the fact this event is two years from now is not a valid reason for deletion. My reasoning for the prod is that I’ve seen many articles for future events deleted and comments saying as the event gets closer the article can be re-created. In fact, just in the past week or two, an article I saw about a 2022 election in, IIRC, a south East Asian country, was deleted for that exact reason. So, my argument is, if why is a sporting event not held to the same standards as a country’s presidential election? ThurstonMitchell ( talk) 22:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)