![]() |
The result was Draftify. Consensus favors moving this page into draft space. Ad Orientem ( talk) 05:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Was prodded, then deprodded with the addition of a single reference, which shows the place existed at one time. Then it was moved into draftspace to encourage development, but was shortly moved back into the mainspace without improvement. But searches show very little coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH. Onel5969 TT me 21:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
"backdoor route to deletion", since draft space provides an area for editors to improve an article when it doesn't yet meet Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. The AfD nominator ( Onel5969) is a different editor, and we did not "conspire" to delete this article.
The previous AfD discussion,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Relations Center, concluded that the "subject is found to lack notability"
, and the article was redirected to
Interhemispheric Resource Center. I note that draftification was also suggested in that discussion.
The article cites a library catalog listing in SNAC that does not show significant coverage of the IRC. Phil Bridger's source from Critical Sociology is good, and I've added it to the article, but it's only one source, and we need multiple qualifying sources to establish notability. I wasn't able to find additional sources that would allow the IRC to meet the requirements of WP:GNG, WP:ORG (particularly with respect to WP:ORGDEPTH) or WP:NGO. Since there is a chance that these sources may be available (due to the Library of Congress designation), draftification gives editors more time to find sources and serves as an alternative to deletion. — Newslinger talk 17:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:51, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Although Ms. Dorian appears to be a talented actress with an interesting career, her work does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Here's the only profile I found: [1]. Snippet view of a 1977 review: [2] gnu 57 21:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:50, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
The topic of the article is allegedly a Polish beast, but its name doesn't sound very Polish. In Polish language, numbers virtually never come after the noun they describe, so that any native speaker would rather say "Półkilogramowy pająk". All the legend sounds hopelessly impossible, improbable to originate either in old or in modern times. Two of three sources seem to be author-related (Alex Pietrow edits AtlasObscura and wrote the code of D&D adventure mentioned in the article). I found no mention about the spider in Polish sources about Skrzyńsko. Resumming, I strongly suspect hoax. Marcowy Człowiek ( talk) 20:06, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Keep This is a story that exists in the Skrzyńsko area amongst the older population and like many myths and stories it is not documented very well, apart from the one book that I was pointed to. I realize that the story sounds fantastical and fairytale like, but like many other mythical creatures, that is often the point. As far as I know it is a cautionary tale told by the older generation to scare children into obedience, like so many other creatures. Yes, it is a local myth, but that does not make it 'untrue' to the extent of it being Polish folklore. (Many of the other creatures are local also.) Other then that I will not deny having a special interest in the myth. As I have roots in the region of its origin, and am one of the children that were brought up with it. (Willing to give proof of some sort if you want?) The name is how I heard it, I will agree with you that your version makes more sense, but that's not how they call it. Maybe it was purposefully changed to be more understandable for kids? Other then that you'll see in my profile that most of my additions to Wikipedia are on niche subjects, focussed on local history/legends. It does not always stick, but I mean well and try always adhere to Wikipedia rules. I'm open to editing the article into a form that agrees better with your opinion or make it part of some larger page, but I would request for it to stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synethos ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC) P.S. Should I add this to the other 2 shares of this request?
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem ( talk) 05:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
This article has been speedily deleted three times. Time to bring it to a discussion and gain consensus. Local organization and radio station which does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:BROADCAST. Onel5969 TT me 13:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
To address the sources (provided by RoySmith) above, they don't mention the radio station as anything special only speaking of community radio as a whole with mentions of the radio station. The third source mentioned above is a bit more promising, but I feel it is the same to my argument at number 2. Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 17:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails notability for an actor. This actor has no significant sources about him. His roles are small (younger version of main character) and uncredited (Singam 3). He hasn't won any awards either. This article should only be created when this actor becomes famous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragoMynaa ( talk • contribs) 22:49, August 9, 2019 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:Nactor. -- DragoMynaa Talk 2:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.
The result was keep. There is consensus that Dev meets point #1 of
WP:ENT/
WP:NACTOR ("Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions"
) with his three film credits.
(non-admin closure) —
Newslinger
talk
08:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails notability for an actor. This actor has no significant source about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragoMynaa ( talk • contribs) 02:33, August 8, 2019 (UTC)
References
References
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
No indication of notability; subject has had only minor roles. Sk8erPrince ( talk) 15:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
A self-published author who is applying for asylum. This article was written by a WP:SPA and is likely to be an autobiography. WP:BEFORE finds others with the same name but no obvious sources to substantiate notability in this case. Guy ( Help!) 15:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Haukur ( talk) 18:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable company, entirely self-sourced. Noble, but not WP:GNG/ WP:CORP as far as I can tell. Guy ( Help!) 14:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Subject does not meet WP:NHOCKEY. Played 118 AHL games and at least 200 is needed to pass #2. NAHL First All-Star team is not enough to pass #3 (or in the very least it isn't listed along with the USHL) and All-Academic honours are not enough to pass #4. Tay87 ( talk) 12:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Athaenara as per WP:G3. (non-admin closure) CptViraj ( 📧) 13:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I can't find a single source to corroborate this tradition being a real thing. Details like 'once every 734.5 days' further make me suspect this is a hoax article. Sam Walton ( talk) 09:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
{{
db-hoax}}
. Tagging as such. --
qedk (
t 桜
c)
09:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Notability has been questioned since 2011. The available sources do not support inclusion under WP:BIO. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 09:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Sources are inadequate to support notability under WP:BIO Morbidthoughts ( talk) 08:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
I don't believe the sources are adequate to support notability under WP:BIO. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 08:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mid Valley Megamall. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Non notable shopping mall. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 19:24, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Haukur ( talk) 09:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
No indication of notability: worked for one of India's tabloids as editor. Held an advisory position to the government. Author of two books. The listed references only attest to his existence but none to his encyclopaedic notability. — kashmīrī TALK 07:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
... a compelling and breathtaking account of the immediate origins of the insurgency" ( Sumit Ganguly)
In its sheer wealth of detail it far surpasses anything that has been written so far [about the Kashmir conflict]" ( Prem Shankar Jha).
References
References
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
No source cited, no coverage found, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 06:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm not seeing any book reviews, so WP:AUTHOR isn't satisfied. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN, with just local coverage. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. The editors calling for speedy keep are correct. The relevant WP:DEL-REASON is "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed" and the nominator has not provided any evidence of such a thorough search per WP:BEFORE, "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. ... The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search". (non-admin closure) Andrew D. ( talk) 17:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced Rathfelder ( talk) 07:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG The are only a few reputable sources referenced on this article and even those don't provide any significant or reliable coverage. It doesn’t seem that notability is verifiable considering the basis is simply that the subject married a prince of a certain town. And the wiki for the town linked by the article conflicts with that and at best only proves that the man she married may be related to someone who was the king of that town roughly half a millennia ago. MVaughnn ( talk) 01:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 06:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Venue is not the subject of any third-party independent sources that indicate notability. Appears to be an old attempt at advertising. Hiàn ( talk) 01:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Draftify. Consensus favors moving this page into draft space. Ad Orientem ( talk) 05:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Was prodded, then deprodded with the addition of a single reference, which shows the place existed at one time. Then it was moved into draftspace to encourage development, but was shortly moved back into the mainspace without improvement. But searches show very little coverage. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH. Onel5969 TT me 21:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
"backdoor route to deletion", since draft space provides an area for editors to improve an article when it doesn't yet meet Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. The AfD nominator ( Onel5969) is a different editor, and we did not "conspire" to delete this article.
The previous AfD discussion,
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Relations Center, concluded that the "subject is found to lack notability"
, and the article was redirected to
Interhemispheric Resource Center. I note that draftification was also suggested in that discussion.
The article cites a library catalog listing in SNAC that does not show significant coverage of the IRC. Phil Bridger's source from Critical Sociology is good, and I've added it to the article, but it's only one source, and we need multiple qualifying sources to establish notability. I wasn't able to find additional sources that would allow the IRC to meet the requirements of WP:GNG, WP:ORG (particularly with respect to WP:ORGDEPTH) or WP:NGO. Since there is a chance that these sources may be available (due to the Library of Congress designation), draftification gives editors more time to find sources and serves as an alternative to deletion. — Newslinger talk 17:28, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:51, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Although Ms. Dorian appears to be a talented actress with an interesting career, her work does not meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Here's the only profile I found: [1]. Snippet view of a 1977 review: [2] gnu 57 21:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:50, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
The topic of the article is allegedly a Polish beast, but its name doesn't sound very Polish. In Polish language, numbers virtually never come after the noun they describe, so that any native speaker would rather say "Półkilogramowy pająk". All the legend sounds hopelessly impossible, improbable to originate either in old or in modern times. Two of three sources seem to be author-related (Alex Pietrow edits AtlasObscura and wrote the code of D&D adventure mentioned in the article). I found no mention about the spider in Polish sources about Skrzyńsko. Resumming, I strongly suspect hoax. Marcowy Człowiek ( talk) 20:06, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Keep This is a story that exists in the Skrzyńsko area amongst the older population and like many myths and stories it is not documented very well, apart from the one book that I was pointed to. I realize that the story sounds fantastical and fairytale like, but like many other mythical creatures, that is often the point. As far as I know it is a cautionary tale told by the older generation to scare children into obedience, like so many other creatures. Yes, it is a local myth, but that does not make it 'untrue' to the extent of it being Polish folklore. (Many of the other creatures are local also.) Other then that I will not deny having a special interest in the myth. As I have roots in the region of its origin, and am one of the children that were brought up with it. (Willing to give proof of some sort if you want?) The name is how I heard it, I will agree with you that your version makes more sense, but that's not how they call it. Maybe it was purposefully changed to be more understandable for kids? Other then that you'll see in my profile that most of my additions to Wikipedia are on niche subjects, focussed on local history/legends. It does not always stick, but I mean well and try always adhere to Wikipedia rules. I'm open to editing the article into a form that agrees better with your opinion or make it part of some larger page, but I would request for it to stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synethos ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC) P.S. Should I add this to the other 2 shares of this request?
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 17:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was no consensus defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem ( talk) 05:24, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
This article has been speedily deleted three times. Time to bring it to a discussion and gain consensus. Local organization and radio station which does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:BROADCAST. Onel5969 TT me 13:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
To address the sources (provided by RoySmith) above, they don't mention the radio station as anything special only speaking of community radio as a whole with mentions of the radio station. The third source mentioned above is a bit more promising, but I feel it is the same to my argument at number 2. Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 17:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails notability for an actor. This actor has no significant sources about him. His roles are small (younger version of main character) and uncredited (Singam 3). He hasn't won any awards either. This article should only be created when this actor becomes famous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragoMynaa ( talk • contribs) 22:49, August 9, 2019 (UTC) Delete. Fails WP:Nactor. -- DragoMynaa Talk 2:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.
The result was keep. There is consensus that Dev meets point #1 of
WP:ENT/
WP:NACTOR ("Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions"
) with his three film credits.
(non-admin closure) —
Newslinger
talk
08:14, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails notability for an actor. This actor has no significant source about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DragoMynaa ( talk • contribs) 02:33, August 8, 2019 (UTC)
References
References
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 16:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
No indication of notability; subject has had only minor roles. Sk8erPrince ( talk) 15:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
A self-published author who is applying for asylum. This article was written by a WP:SPA and is likely to be an autobiography. WP:BEFORE finds others with the same name but no obvious sources to substantiate notability in this case. Guy ( Help!) 15:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Haukur ( talk) 18:34, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable company, entirely self-sourced. Noble, but not WP:GNG/ WP:CORP as far as I can tell. Guy ( Help!) 14:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:45, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Subject does not meet WP:NHOCKEY. Played 118 AHL games and at least 200 is needed to pass #2. NAHL First All-Star team is not enough to pass #3 (or in the very least it isn't listed along with the USHL) and All-Academic honours are not enough to pass #4. Tay87 ( talk) 12:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Athaenara as per WP:G3. (non-admin closure) CptViraj ( 📧) 13:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
I can't find a single source to corroborate this tradition being a real thing. Details like 'once every 734.5 days' further make me suspect this is a hoax article. Sam Walton ( talk) 09:36, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
{{
db-hoax}}
. Tagging as such. --
qedk (
t 桜
c)
09:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Notability has been questioned since 2011. The available sources do not support inclusion under WP:BIO. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 09:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Sources are inadequate to support notability under WP:BIO Morbidthoughts ( talk) 08:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:10, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
I don't believe the sources are adequate to support notability under WP:BIO. Morbidthoughts ( talk) 08:31, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was merge to Mid Valley Megamall. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Non notable shopping mall. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 19:24, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Haukur ( talk) 09:48, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
No indication of notability: worked for one of India's tabloids as editor. Held an advisory position to the government. Author of two books. The listed references only attest to his existence but none to his encyclopaedic notability. — kashmīrī TALK 07:23, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
... a compelling and breathtaking account of the immediate origins of the insurgency" ( Sumit Ganguly)
In its sheer wealth of detail it far surpasses anything that has been written so far [about the Kashmir conflict]" ( Prem Shankar Jha).
References
References
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
No source cited, no coverage found, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 06:51, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm not seeing any book reviews, so WP:AUTHOR isn't satisfied. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 09:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN, with just local coverage. Clarityfiend ( talk) 08:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. The editors calling for speedy keep are correct. The relevant WP:DEL-REASON is "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed" and the nominator has not provided any evidence of such a thorough search per WP:BEFORE, "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. ... The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search". (non-admin closure) Andrew D. ( talk) 17:28, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Completely unreferenced Rathfelder ( talk) 07:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 00:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG The are only a few reputable sources referenced on this article and even those don't provide any significant or reliable coverage. It doesn’t seem that notability is verifiable considering the basis is simply that the subject married a prince of a certain town. And the wiki for the town linked by the article conflicts with that and at best only proves that the man she married may be related to someone who was the king of that town roughly half a millennia ago. MVaughnn ( talk) 01:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 06:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Venue is not the subject of any third-party independent sources that indicate notability. Appears to be an old attempt at advertising. Hiàn ( talk) 01:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)