![]() |
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Unreliable cited sources (basically just a post on dieselpunks.org [1] and one on disciplesofflight.com, [2] neither citing their own sources), and other more reliable/detailed sources indicating this is a hoax. [3] [4] As the Talk page shows, When someone asked for validation last year, the author pointed to a German title which turned out to be a children's picture book Rovack ( talk) 00:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is interviews, passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability, such as interviews with executives: [2]. Created by Special:Contributions/Jeremy112233 currently indef-blocked for abusing multiple accounts; please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jeremy112233. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH and in general looks to be part of a promotional campaign. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The article notes:
New York's Bounce Exchange wants to give you a reason to stick around. The behavioral automation software and analytics provider is on a mission to make the internet more polite. By analyzing user behavior--for instance, from where someone enters a site and the amount of time he or she spends there--Bounce Exchange wants to maximize conversion. In other words, it wants to help you turn consumers into customers.
... Bounce Exchange co-founder and CEO Ryan Urban ...
...
If you ask Urban what's behind his company's growth, you'll get a boilerplate response: "It's been very organic, mostly client driven." The company's first client was online retailer BustedTees. It now counts about a dozen Fortune 500 companies as customers, as well as dozens of popular internet retailers and eight of the world's 10 largest publishers.
The article notes:
BounceX is currently working with over 800 clients that range from startups, such as Handy and Plated, to big publishers such as CNBC, USA Today and TIME.
The company has grown surprisingly quickly in the past three years, especially considering that it had only taken in $1.5 million in seed funding prior to this round.
Launched in 2012, BounceX currently employs over 100 people (more than triple the number employed at this time last year) and reports millions in annual revenue.
The article notes:
Google-backed UK startup Yieldify is embroiled in a legal battle with US rival Bounce Exchange, which accuses it of stealing Bounce's code and infringing its patents.
The increasingly vicious case has now taken an unusual new twist — with Yieldify going on the offensive and accusing Bounce Exchange of patent infringement, using a patent it recently purchased from a company once labelled "the most hated company in tech" and accused of being a notorious patent troll.
The article notes:
Google-backed London startup Yieldify has reached a legal settlement with a company that accused it of copying code.
The accusations, levelled by US competitor Bounce Exchange, prompted an ugly year-long legal battle, complete with counter-suits, threats targeting customers, and name-calling.
TechCrunch has editorial oversight, is reputable, and publishes corrections so passes Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. I consider it a source that contributes to notability.However, Rob Enderle, founder of Bend, Oregon-based Enderle Group, says there's something more tectonic afoot. Bounce Exchange has tapped into a market that's only just now emerging, says the technology industry analyst. The marketing world still largely revolves around views and clickthroughs of ads and websites, but companies are starting to think more about conversion.
The reasons are plentiful, says Enderle, noting that conversion--for instance, signing a new subscriber or triggering a sale--leads to actual money coming in. While some companies promise ad views, a company like Bounce Exchange is promising a return on investment. "In theory, the money you pay to them, you get a hard return on," he says.
The Business Insider articles provide more coverage about the company's history.
The sources provide deep coverage of the subject. They note that Bounce Exchange has "about a dozen Fortune 500 companies as customers, as well as dozens of popular internet retailers and eight of the world's 10 largest publishers", works with "big publishers such as CNBC, USA Today and TIME", has 100 employees, and was founded in 2012. They provide detailed coverage about how Bounce Exchange works:
Cunard ( talk) 08:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Instead, BounceX watches the behavior of each user — how they entered the site, how long they’re there, what they’re looking at, and if they’re commenting or sharing, among other metrics — and adjusts the marketing accordingly.
Someone who reads multiple business-related articles and shares them on Twitter, for instance, is a much better target for a yearly subscription to TIME than someone who reads half of one article about celebrities that popped up on Facebook.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing about this subject stands out as even remotely notable. MizukaS ( talk) 22:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No notability other than acting as Wesley Snipes' lawyer at one point. NapoliRoma ( talk) 22:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. copyright violation Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:07, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Article is sourced to non-RS. A BEFORE fails to find any references in Google News, JSTOR, or newspapers.com. There are two highly incidental references in Google Books, but not enough to pass the GNG. Chetsford ( talk) 22:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Band fails WP:MUSICBIO - founded in 2014, it released two albums on indie labels. Sources in article are non-RS. "Wolf Girl" is a (surprisingly) common term but doesn't seem to meet GNG on a BEFORE. Chetsford ( talk) 22:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I don't see evidence that this film meets the WP:NFO notability criteria. Enwebb ( talk) 21:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to SBA Airlines destinations. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
This article duplicates the content in Santa Barbara Airlines destinations. Rhadow ( talk) 21:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I was unable to establish notability per WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The best sources are this interview with "small business news" and this interview with Tech.Revolution. The others are primary sources. Interviews in such obscure sources do not tend to demonstrate notability. My own searches have found some quotes by him in RS: [3] [4] [5] but I still don't think they are enough to meet WP:BIO. SmartSE ( talk) 22:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nova Mob (album). Spartaz Humbug! 00:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM Enwebb ( talk) 19:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO; suboptimal sourcing. Apparently played a few non-minor roles but those productions do not appear notable and have no articles. It could be a WP:TOOSOON case... Input welcome. — Paleo Neonate – 16:56, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Had some minor mentions in the gaming press in its time as a curiosity, but nothing significant. Does not pass the WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 15:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete as per WP:GNG. Barely any sources cover it, generally unnotable. ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 18:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete as non-notable. Centibyte (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The subject of article appears to fail
WP:CORPDEPTH. The article is sourced almost entirely from the company's website - not a reason for deletion in itself - but that perhaps reflects the lack of coverage in reliable third-party sources. In the required
WP:BEFORE, I noticed that the company may possibly be a subsidiary or subcontractor of
Ride Entertainment Group - no prejudice to a
WP:REDIRECT to that article. Otherwise, all the mentions of this company in google hits would seem to be those that would be expected of a "
run of the mill" company: amusement park industry news, company listings and so on.
As always, more than happy to be proven wrong. Pete AU aka
Shirt58 (
talk)
09:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
This is a SPAM Advertisement post, submitted by the company associates in order to gain Search Engine credibility via linking through Wikipedia. Company does not have any credible verifiable references, all references provided are paid press releases. 167.160.109.39 14:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Not notable. One trivial mention and one unreliable source. Fails WP:NFILM Mar11 ( talk) 05:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. Fails WP:GNG & WP:MBIO. Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. — Za wl 09:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Article is about a primary school which, though having a long history, seems to be unremarkable. The article is cited to a local archealogical report, but the building does not appear to have any merit (it doesn't have any heritage listing). the third source is WP:OR, being the school's log book. Wikipedia's default is that primary schools aren't automatically notable, time for this one to go? Sionk ( talk) 20:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I've failed to find any evidence of notability. The article cites three sources: 1 was published by the maker of the product, 2 gives a "not found" message, and 3 does not mention the subject. Maproom ( talk) 20:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 00:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Robert B. Brewer was a career U.S. Army officer.During World War II, he served with the 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment and was seriously wounded in the Netherlands. After a break in service following WW II, he rejoined the Army and eventually was promoted to colonel. He served as an intelligence officer with the OSS and CIA during the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Much of the information on his page is sourced to a family web site. Brewer does not qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia under WP:SOLDIER or based on any significant coverage after his retirement. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 01:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 00:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORP, a pharmacy, speedy deletion was requested twice, but the SPA creator of the article improperly removed the tag. Rusf10 ( talk) 04:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Started by SPA. Nothing significant in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 13:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Grameenphone. Any properly sourced content can be merged from page history. Alexa rank isn't an indicator of notability. ansh 666 19:25, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Not a notable app, main content is "this app is free and available for ios, android". Does not satisfy GNG or product notability. The sources are nearly all primary (app store, google play store source), either the developer's web site or vanity sources or promotional press releases. Aftabuzzaman ( talk) 16:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NHOOPS or WP:GNG. I don't believe that he ever was on the Lebanese national team. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 20:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No indication or evidence of notability. Cannot find evidence that this was ever built. There are many "tank farms" in the world, and it's unclear why this one would be notable, if it was ever constructed. PK T(alk) 20:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Article is non-notable and very low-quality. See WP:LISTN. Centibyte (talk) 20:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH AFAICT. Created and maintained by an SPA inserting increasingly promotional content. Following earlier CSD-A7. "Puffery but salvageable", quoth the declining admin, but it's only getting worse. Kleuske ( talk) 18:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No sourced content about the place, no indication of independent notability (its got a post office? and?). Should be redirected to Ipswich. Nilf anion ( talk) 17:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable actor, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources and I can't see if the actor has played a major role in any of the film listed in the article except Kaathadi which is not yet released so fails WP:NACTOR and general notability guideline. GSS ( talk| c| em) 17:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I can't find enough independent non-local WP:RS to indicate that he passes WP:GNG. There is no WP:SNG for triathletes, but I suspect that simply competing in the world championships isn't enough in the absence of sourcing.
I checked Google, GBooks, GNews, and found very little. The one book result is a first-person account of running a triathalon, and the result from Dignitas International says right at the bottom that he works for them, so it isn't independent. Otherwise all coverage is local to Toronto. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 16:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. SmartSE ( talk) 20:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial sources. reddogsix ( talk) 16:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not yet seem to pass WP:GNG. Google News only gives a few results, and they all seem to be routine coverage only. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced atticle about yet another putative musical genre, something the world needs like a hole in the head. Actually there was an interesting programme on the wireless yesterday about trepanning; on second thoughts that should be even less than a hole in the head. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The references are mere mentions and are not about the entity. A google news search shows no results of actual articles about this person. The edit history showed that it failed AFC and was published anyways. It looks like an advert created to promote a politician on Wikipedia. CerealKillerYum ( talk) 15:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable junior college not listed in the Pune school lists. No significant coverage provided, only some random profile articles with passing mentions or the school website. Article was created by a user blocked for COI. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMEDIA. MT Train Discuss 14:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Speedied this, but the speedy removed cos there is sourcing. The editor who removed the speedy replaced it with a PROD, commenting that the coverage was run-of-the-mill. Which I agree with. And the PROD removed by (eyes do not widen in disbelief) by page creator. In a word. fails WP:GNG. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ignored sock vote Spartaz Humbug! 00:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
[Non-notable individual who fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.223.41.59 ( talk) 04:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 19:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN as an unsuccessful candidate for public office. All of the coverage surrounding him is about his campaigns and he doesn't therefore meet WP:GNG. Marquardtika ( talk) 18:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC) I would support redirecting this article to United States House of Representatives elections in New Jersey, 2018 per the standard outcomes at WP:POLOUTCOMES. 19:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment- As pointed out by Bearcat above, I've got to say that the sourcing for this particular article is incredibly weak even when compared to other unelected candidates. Other one Newark Star-Ledger article and the subruban news article mentioned above, I wouldn't consider any of the current sourcing in the article to be reliable. And the Star-Ledger articlesaren't even exclusively about the subject so the requirement for in-depth coverage is not met. The only in-depth rs coverage comes from the local Morristown Daily Record and that's just one article. I don't see this article passing WP:GNG under any circumstance.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 01:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:11, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
This article is about a book and appears to have been written by one of the book's authors. I have been unable to find any reviews of this book online and believe it fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete: insufficiently notable American actress. Quis separabit? 03:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, as per the article it is a "small sandstone quarry", so I really don't see its significance. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two relistings, no consensus for a particular outcome has emerged in this discussion. Sources were presented later in the discussion by a user, but no other participants have provided a critique of those sources. Also, the second delete !vote (after the nomination) appears to be assessing notability based upon the sources presently in the article, which differ from those presented later in the discussion. Note that per WP:NEXIST, topic notability is to be based upon overall available suitable sources about a topic, rather than the state of sourcing in articles. North America 1000 19:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing significant. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 14:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The "Summer Language Bursary Program" was created in 1971 and renamed to Explore in 2004.
The abstract of the 17-page article notes:
Canada's Summer Language Bursary Program is a joint national-provincial effort providing immersion in French- or English-as-a-Second-Language to Canadian students. Despite 18 years of success and the benefits gained at small expense, the program is not well-known and risks losing funding. Self-promotion and lobbying are necessary. (Author/MSE)
The book notes:
The Summer Language Bursary Program (SLBP) is an important program for Canadian students that supports end of secondary and postsecondary French and English learning <www.cmec.ca/olp/, 1999>. Intensive 5-week immersion courses in either or both languages, supplemented with cultural activities and contact with native speakers, are run by some 40 postsecondary institutions across Canada for students between Grade 11 (Quebec high school graduation) and second-year university. Bursaries, awarded across the country by lottery, defray the cost of tuition, instructional materials, and living expenses for between 3,000 and 4,000 Canadian students each summer. The program is funded by the Department of Canadian Heritage and administered by the government department responsible for postsecondary education in each of the provinces and territories in conjunction with the Council of Ministers of Education (Department of Canadian Heritage, 1999).
The Official Languages Monitor Program (OLMP) is another program that encourages postsecondary langauge learning and that provides financial aid to students. It is also funded by the Department of Canadian Heritage. The Program is for bilingual postsecondary students who agree to study outside of their home province, usually in an area where their second official language is dominant. They work in tutorial or teacher's aid positions in schools or postsecondary institutions in their first language and receive fellowships to help cover their tuition fees. This program benefits not only the over 1,000 students who participate annually but also the second language programs in which they work (Department of Canadian Heritage, 1999).
The book notes:
The Canadian government also created two programs related to official languages in education outside of the BEP umbrella. The Summer Language Bursary Program was launched in 1971 to provide grants to postsecondary students who wanted to undergo a short-term intensive training program in their second-language during the summer months. In 1973 this was followed up with the Official Language Monitors Program, under which students from either official languages would work together with a teacher in a school where their language was the minority-language. These programs were funded completely by the federal government and administered by the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC).
The book also notes:
... Feeling specifically targeted by the federal government, Quebec refused to commit itself to future involvement in the Summer Language Bursary and Official Language Monitors programs (which were normall negotiated separately) until the BEP issue was settled, effectively freezing these two programs. (The Summer Language Bursary Program allowed university students to travel to another province to spend several weeks learning their second language in an immersion environment. The Official Language Monitors Program paid university students, usually from French-language communities, to work as teaching assistants with second-language teachers.)
The article notes:
In addition to the adult-oriented programs listed above, Canadians can participate in intensive immersion courses through the federally sponsored Explore program (cf. The Council of Ministers of Education, Canada 2012). This program provides students with a $2,200 bursary that covers tuition, meals and accommodation for five weeks in the spring or summer. It is an opportunity for francophones to immerse themselves in English and for anglophones to immerse themselves in French. The bursary is not guaranteed and is distributed through a lottery system. Successful applicants are placed in one of 30 different institutions for the study of French (mainly, but not exclusively, in Quebec).
The article notes:
Founded in 1971, the Explore Program was created with the intent of providing students with opportunities to learn French in an immersive cultural experience.
The five-week program has spring and summer sessions, consisting mostly of high school and university students who travel to over 20 participating institutions. The Explore Program (age 18+) and Destination Clic (grades 8-9) are funded through the Council of Minsters of Education, Canada (CMEC).
For Explore, most full-time applicants will receive a bursary to the tune of $2,200 (per student), paid directly to the institution to cover tuition, accommodation, food, and recreational and leisure activities. It’s a significant government investment in developing Francophone language and heritage across Canada.
I couldn’t find numbers of how many students go through the program every year, but it’s so popular that there’s actually a lottery draw for applicants. The most popular destinations (Montreal and Quebec City) are invariably oversubscribed, so most students wishing to attend school within Quebec usually end up in a smaller town like Trois-Rivières or Chicoutimi.
The book notes:
In 1971, the Secretary of State started funding the Summer Language Bursary Program (renamed the Explore Program in 2004), administered by the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC), permitting university-aged students to spend several weeks immersed in the other language community. In 1973, it added the Official Languages Monitor Program (renamed the Odyssey Program in 2004), also with the CMEC, that funded university-aged students to work as teachers' language assistants in communities across the country.
The result was keep. Per the uncontested sources proffered by Cunard. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
I can't see how this meets WP:CORP. It's an architecture practice, and has worked on several notable buildings; some of that work has received coverage in the press, and the company has been mentioned in that context. It received a nomination for the Stirling Prize in 2011. Apart from a couple of sentences in this book, I can find no significant in-depth coverage of the company itself. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
References
From https://www.amazon.com/Bennetts-Associates-Commentaries-Peter-Carolin/dp/1904772153:
Since its foundation in 1987, Bennetts Associates has won numerous awards for its work and has established itself in the UK as one of the leading architecture practices of its generation. This is the first book to examine the firm's ethos and the themes behind its buildings. Four aspects of Bennetts Associates' work are considered in depth-Perception, Form, Construction and Process-drawing on over 30 built projects in detail, as well as many others in various stages of design and construction. These projects, include Hampstead Theatre, the Wessex Water Headquarters, Brighton Central Library and the New Street Square development in the City of London.
Each of the underlying themes is examined in turn by four well-known writers or commentators - academics Richard Weston and Peter Carolin, design process theorist Frank Duffy and art consultant Vivien Lovell.
The book notes:
Queen Elizabeth II Court is the headquarters of Hampshire County Council (HCC), which carries out administrative functions for a large area of southern England. The building (known formerly as Ashburton Court) houses today 1,100 staff although, when constructed in 1960, it housed only 600. Hence, this example of eco-refurbishment is not only the result of green retrofitting but of improving the efficiency and intensity of the use of office space. The project was undertaken by architects Bennetts Associates, one of the UK's most successful designers of green buildings.
The book notes:
Rab Bennetts founded the eponymous Bennetts Associates Architects and is one of the leading proponents of green buildings in the United Kingdom. Bennetts is well known for several landmark projects, including the Brighton Library. He started the firm in 1987 and now employs about seventy people at two offices in London and Edinburgh.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The article does not prove its subject to be notable. It looks like a run-of-the-mill mobile app, like billions of others, that come and go every day. (Actually, the article is about an app, a company and a scheme.) It does not seem to have any impact. Codename Lisa ( talk) 07:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 09:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Non notable actress. unreliable sources and no notable works or awards whatsoever. Mar11 ( talk) 07:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly an in detail. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO as the XRCO Award category ("Unsung Siren") is not significant and well known. Significant RS coverage not found. Being on a list of "Ten Underrated Porn Performers We Love" strongly suggests a lack of notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
[[
WP:BASIC]]
/[[
WP:GNG]]
have not been found.
Sam
Sailor
22:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that this meets WP:ORG Most reliable sources are typical news reports; no indication that this passes WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:ORGIND. Bneu2013 ( talk) 06:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
This seems to be a case of WP:NOTINHERITED. Despite a very long list of references, none of them appear to discuss the subject in any depth. The article is basically just a resume and neither WP:CREATIVE or WP:BIO seem to be met. Note that some of the more RS referenced do not even mention the subject: e.g. [23] [24]. SmartSE ( talk) 14:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable homebrew software application that doesn't pass WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 15:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Zutons. Merge as you will Spartaz Humbug! 00:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No notability outside the band, fails WP:GNG & WP:MBIO. — Za wl 09:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close I have returned it to draftspace. The article was unilaterally moved from draftspace to mainspace by someone other than the author or an AFC reviewer, it is in fact still pending review at AFC. . Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 07:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not satisfy software notability or general notability based on in-depth independent coverage. The sources are not independent, but are associated with the developer. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to Philip Morris International#Controversies. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 01:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A non-notable organisation that doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. No coverage in significant reliable sources, with the only substantial coverage on the company being from wiki site SourceWatch which seems to source it's content from primary tobacco industry documents. No content worth saving, and the title would not be a plausible redirect. Kb.au ( talk) 23:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Crow#In other media. J04n( talk page) 15:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Collectible card game that does not appear to pass notability guidelines. The only sources listed with substantial information are brandonlee.com and cardboardconnection, neither or which appear reliable. My own searches don't come up with any information. Pretty much just a one-time release of Crow-inspired cards that was really not notable. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep Merge -
El cid, el campeador's argument against the sources was: "the full on books are not books about the Crow", suggesting books need to be solely on one topic. But his own citing of Wikipolicy
WP:GNG says the opposite: "but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material."
Leitmotiv (
talk)
* Keep the game meets the GNG, in the specific sense (which is the only important sense) that the facts about its publication can be reliably sourced. There is no reason that WP should not have an article on every published CCG that meets this GNG requirement, regardless of whether or not people who don't play CCGs consider the game noteworthy. That subjective evaluation is not a GNG requirement. Newimpartial ( talk) 23:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 00:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Since neither of his companies are notable, I don't see how he is likely to be either. The many lists and notices he is on are PR, designed for that purpose and do not show notability no matter where they are published. Mentions in various books doesn't do it either. Created by an editor named "IranianEntrepreneurs", so it is almost certainly promotional editing. DGG ( talk ) 21:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Non-notable local hotel Dough 4872 18:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete Mostly backed with primary sources so it is nothing more than self promotion. Mattg82 ( talk) 19:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Strong delete It is just one of the similarly sized hotels in an area. Acnetj ( talk) 21:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM Enwebb ( talk) 19:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 09:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
This disambiguation page was created with a list of entries that were all partial title matches. It was PRODed, deleted, recreated, PRODed again, deproded, and then trimmed down to its current state. Unless there are more entries to add, the page serves no discernible purpose. - Eureka Lott 05:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Only one of the three sources on the page even mentions him. He's deputy chief of staff for a Member of Congress, which doesn't make him notable. Marquardtika ( talk) 22:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Draftify.Best option since notability was failed to be well-established, by itself, in the course of the debate. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 00:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
fails WP:NORG a WP:SOAPBOX piece written by a user with a decalered WP:COI. The sources are either declared as having been written by members of the association (2, 5, 6, 7) the associations own web site, the profil of the association on the charity commission web site or 2 unverifable "assessments" which are not proof of notability even if they were verifiable. Dom from Paris ( talk) 09:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Not notable, also WP:NAD Enwebb ( talk) 05:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 09:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable child actress. No indication of notability. No real sources, other than IMDb. It was deleted at AFD in July 2011, and re-created eight months later. I started trying to find sources, and there's nothing really out there other than IMDb, which lists pretty much every actor, notable or not.
It is probably eligible for a G4 Speedy Deletion, but without having seen the prior deleted content, I can't say that it is a "sufficiently identical copy" of the deleted page. TJRC ( talk) 04:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 09:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Player is non-notable, because he has not appeared on the major league level. Fbdave ( talk) 04:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seems like the claim of WP:JOURNALIST or WP:GNG being met don't hold up insofar as all the sources are contested on the grounds of non-independence or non-substantiveness, and these contestations have not been rebutted. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
fails to meet WP:JOURNALIST. no in-depth coverage in reliable , independent sources. many of the cited sources are either non-independent of the subject or are unreliable. Saqib ( talk) 04:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page for an unremarkable entrepreneur. Coverage is mostly hyper-local, such as The Desert Sun. There's one piece of international coverage "The US town that wants to become the best place to grow cannabis in the world", but its coverage of the subject is based on an interview and is not sufficient for notability, focusing on his hopes aspirations:
As a president of the local trade group, it's natural that he does a lot of self-promotion, but this does not amount to encyclopedia notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A directory-like listing on an unremarkable private company founded in 2009. Significant RS coverage not found. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Rejected multiple times at AfC and then moved to mainspace anyway. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Rusf10 ( talk) 02:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable cemetery, fails WP:GNG. The current sourcing consists of the cemetery's website, a website that some guy created about local cemeteries, newjerseycivilwargravestones.org (also doesn't appear reliable), and obituaries for one of the people buried there (not significant coverage of the cemetery). A ** WP:BEFORE** search doesn't reveal much else. So the inevitable question does not come up, I oppose a merge since there is very little information about the cemetery or its importance, there is nothing worth merging to another article. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because the notability and sourcing problems are identical:
The result was redirect to Fairfield, Connecticut. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 00:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Despite the level of detail here, this middle school does not seem notable. Tacyarg ( talk) 02:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
This bio has been tagged as needing Verification since 2009. She won some local and state level titles but the page mainly details how she lost various state and national level events. Subject ffails WP:ENT which requires them to have a significant role in a significant event. Per WP:NOPAGE her wins are best presented on the corresponding lists. Her later work in event promotion does not convey wikipedia notability. Legacypac ( talk) 02:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NPOL as a candidate in a US House primary, and no other claim of notability. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Outside of the billboard link above, he hasn't gotten much coverage about his managing of Bon Iver. However, he has gotten some very significant national press, most notably in the last 12 hours, for being the manager of a significant music group and running for congress:
ArtisticLaudableOwls ( talk) 01:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 09:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Ten years no references. I found no reliable ones. Rhadow ( talk) 00:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A variety of problems here. The organization appears to be a defunct WP:BRANCH of a national organization. The page has be tagged for notability concerns, COI concerns and [WP:V]] for 8 years but no one has addressed these real issues. The business is dead now, website gone, which is the primary source for the data. With a couple of exceptions where a subject went on to become notable, the winners are not notable and don't have pages about them or even refs to support the names on the list. In short, a minor business which operated in a limited geographic region and is no more notable than any of the other minor pageants around the world. Legacypac ( talk) 00:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Also this topic was deleted in 2007 as not notable and a 2011 discussion failed to find concensus. Inclusion standards for companies WP:NCORP have risen substantially in the last few years. Legacypac ( talk) 00:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mahmudiyah rape and killings#Steven Dale Green. And locked Spartaz Humbug! 00:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Procedural nomination of declined CSD G4 (recreation). I am not taking a position on this myself either way. The article failed AfD in 2009 on the grounds of BLP1E. The decision was upheld at DRV in 2014 but with no objection to recreation with new material. As far as I can tell, the only things that are substantially different are that the subject is now dead and that there have been a number of writings about him both academic and a play inspired by his life. However, all of these still essentially stem from the one event. The passage of time and the changed circumstances call for a new review at AfD rather than a speedy deletion. Spinning Spark 00:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
*Locked redirect. The first AfD was a proper close. While DRV didn't oppose recreation, but nothing more notable has actually happened. Niteshift36 ( talk) 14:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Unreliable cited sources (basically just a post on dieselpunks.org [1] and one on disciplesofflight.com, [2] neither citing their own sources), and other more reliable/detailed sources indicating this is a hoax. [3] [4] As the Talk page shows, When someone asked for validation last year, the author pointed to a German title which turned out to be a children's picture book Rovack ( talk) 00:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
References
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is interviews, passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability, such as interviews with executives: [2]. Created by Special:Contributions/Jeremy112233 currently indef-blocked for abusing multiple accounts; please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jeremy112233. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH and in general looks to be part of a promotional campaign. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The article notes:
New York's Bounce Exchange wants to give you a reason to stick around. The behavioral automation software and analytics provider is on a mission to make the internet more polite. By analyzing user behavior--for instance, from where someone enters a site and the amount of time he or she spends there--Bounce Exchange wants to maximize conversion. In other words, it wants to help you turn consumers into customers.
... Bounce Exchange co-founder and CEO Ryan Urban ...
...
If you ask Urban what's behind his company's growth, you'll get a boilerplate response: "It's been very organic, mostly client driven." The company's first client was online retailer BustedTees. It now counts about a dozen Fortune 500 companies as customers, as well as dozens of popular internet retailers and eight of the world's 10 largest publishers.
The article notes:
BounceX is currently working with over 800 clients that range from startups, such as Handy and Plated, to big publishers such as CNBC, USA Today and TIME.
The company has grown surprisingly quickly in the past three years, especially considering that it had only taken in $1.5 million in seed funding prior to this round.
Launched in 2012, BounceX currently employs over 100 people (more than triple the number employed at this time last year) and reports millions in annual revenue.
The article notes:
Google-backed UK startup Yieldify is embroiled in a legal battle with US rival Bounce Exchange, which accuses it of stealing Bounce's code and infringing its patents.
The increasingly vicious case has now taken an unusual new twist — with Yieldify going on the offensive and accusing Bounce Exchange of patent infringement, using a patent it recently purchased from a company once labelled "the most hated company in tech" and accused of being a notorious patent troll.
The article notes:
Google-backed London startup Yieldify has reached a legal settlement with a company that accused it of copying code.
The accusations, levelled by US competitor Bounce Exchange, prompted an ugly year-long legal battle, complete with counter-suits, threats targeting customers, and name-calling.
TechCrunch has editorial oversight, is reputable, and publishes corrections so passes Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. I consider it a source that contributes to notability.However, Rob Enderle, founder of Bend, Oregon-based Enderle Group, says there's something more tectonic afoot. Bounce Exchange has tapped into a market that's only just now emerging, says the technology industry analyst. The marketing world still largely revolves around views and clickthroughs of ads and websites, but companies are starting to think more about conversion.
The reasons are plentiful, says Enderle, noting that conversion--for instance, signing a new subscriber or triggering a sale--leads to actual money coming in. While some companies promise ad views, a company like Bounce Exchange is promising a return on investment. "In theory, the money you pay to them, you get a hard return on," he says.
The Business Insider articles provide more coverage about the company's history.
The sources provide deep coverage of the subject. They note that Bounce Exchange has "about a dozen Fortune 500 companies as customers, as well as dozens of popular internet retailers and eight of the world's 10 largest publishers", works with "big publishers such as CNBC, USA Today and TIME", has 100 employees, and was founded in 2012. They provide detailed coverage about how Bounce Exchange works:
Cunard ( talk) 08:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Instead, BounceX watches the behavior of each user — how they entered the site, how long they’re there, what they’re looking at, and if they’re commenting or sharing, among other metrics — and adjusts the marketing accordingly.
Someone who reads multiple business-related articles and shares them on Twitter, for instance, is a much better target for a yearly subscription to TIME than someone who reads half of one article about celebrities that popped up on Facebook.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing about this subject stands out as even remotely notable. MizukaS ( talk) 22:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No notability other than acting as Wesley Snipes' lawyer at one point. NapoliRoma ( talk) 22:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. copyright violation Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:07, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Article is sourced to non-RS. A BEFORE fails to find any references in Google News, JSTOR, or newspapers.com. There are two highly incidental references in Google Books, but not enough to pass the GNG. Chetsford ( talk) 22:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Band fails WP:MUSICBIO - founded in 2014, it released two albums on indie labels. Sources in article are non-RS. "Wolf Girl" is a (surprisingly) common term but doesn't seem to meet GNG on a BEFORE. Chetsford ( talk) 22:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I don't see evidence that this film meets the WP:NFO notability criteria. Enwebb ( talk) 21:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to SBA Airlines destinations. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
This article duplicates the content in Santa Barbara Airlines destinations. Rhadow ( talk) 21:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I was unable to establish notability per WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. -- Tavix ( talk) 23:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:14, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The best sources are this interview with "small business news" and this interview with Tech.Revolution. The others are primary sources. Interviews in such obscure sources do not tend to demonstrate notability. My own searches have found some quotes by him in RS: [3] [4] [5] but I still don't think they are enough to meet WP:BIO. SmartSE ( talk) 22:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nova Mob (album). Spartaz Humbug! 00:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM Enwebb ( talk) 19:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet WP:NBIO; suboptimal sourcing. Apparently played a few non-minor roles but those productions do not appear notable and have no articles. It could be a WP:TOOSOON case... Input welcome. — Paleo Neonate – 16:56, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:04, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Had some minor mentions in the gaming press in its time as a curiosity, but nothing significant. Does not pass the WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 15:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete as per WP:GNG. Barely any sources cover it, generally unnotable. ~ P*h3i (talk to me) 18:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete as non-notable. Centibyte (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The subject of article appears to fail
WP:CORPDEPTH. The article is sourced almost entirely from the company's website - not a reason for deletion in itself - but that perhaps reflects the lack of coverage in reliable third-party sources. In the required
WP:BEFORE, I noticed that the company may possibly be a subsidiary or subcontractor of
Ride Entertainment Group - no prejudice to a
WP:REDIRECT to that article. Otherwise, all the mentions of this company in google hits would seem to be those that would be expected of a "
run of the mill" company: amusement park industry news, company listings and so on.
As always, more than happy to be proven wrong. Pete AU aka
Shirt58 (
talk)
09:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
This is a SPAM Advertisement post, submitted by the company associates in order to gain Search Engine credibility via linking through Wikipedia. Company does not have any credible verifiable references, all references provided are paid press releases. 167.160.109.39 14:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Not notable. One trivial mention and one unreliable source. Fails WP:NFILM Mar11 ( talk) 05:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:00, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable musician. Fails WP:GNG & WP:MBIO. Lack of significant coverage of reliable sources. — Za wl 09:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Article is about a primary school which, though having a long history, seems to be unremarkable. The article is cited to a local archealogical report, but the building does not appear to have any merit (it doesn't have any heritage listing). the third source is WP:OR, being the school's log book. Wikipedia's default is that primary schools aren't automatically notable, time for this one to go? Sionk ( talk) 20:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:08, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
I've failed to find any evidence of notability. The article cites three sources: 1 was published by the maker of the product, 2 gives a "not found" message, and 3 does not mention the subject. Maproom ( talk) 20:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 00:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Robert B. Brewer was a career U.S. Army officer.During World War II, he served with the 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment and was seriously wounded in the Netherlands. After a break in service following WW II, he rejoined the Army and eventually was promoted to colonel. He served as an intelligence officer with the OSS and CIA during the Korean War and the Vietnam War. Much of the information on his page is sourced to a family web site. Brewer does not qualify for inclusion in Wikipedia under WP:SOLDIER or based on any significant coverage after his retirement. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 01:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 00:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORP, a pharmacy, speedy deletion was requested twice, but the SPA creator of the article improperly removed the tag. Rusf10 ( talk) 04:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Started by SPA. Nothing significant in WP:RS. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 13:13, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Grameenphone. Any properly sourced content can be merged from page history. Alexa rank isn't an indicator of notability. ansh 666 19:25, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Not a notable app, main content is "this app is free and available for ios, android". Does not satisfy GNG or product notability. The sources are nearly all primary (app store, google play store source), either the developer's web site or vanity sources or promotional press releases. Aftabuzzaman ( talk) 16:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NHOOPS or WP:GNG. I don't believe that he ever was on the Lebanese national team. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 20:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No indication or evidence of notability. Cannot find evidence that this was ever built. There are many "tank farms" in the world, and it's unclear why this one would be notable, if it was ever constructed. PK T(alk) 20:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Article is non-notable and very low-quality. See WP:LISTN. Centibyte (talk) 20:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH AFAICT. Created and maintained by an SPA inserting increasingly promotional content. Following earlier CSD-A7. "Puffery but salvageable", quoth the declining admin, but it's only getting worse. Kleuske ( talk) 18:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No sourced content about the place, no indication of independent notability (its got a post office? and?). Should be redirected to Ipswich. Nilf anion ( talk) 17:38, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable actor, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources and I can't see if the actor has played a major role in any of the film listed in the article except Kaathadi which is not yet released so fails WP:NACTOR and general notability guideline. GSS ( talk| c| em) 17:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:21, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
I can't find enough independent non-local WP:RS to indicate that he passes WP:GNG. There is no WP:SNG for triathletes, but I suspect that simply competing in the world championships isn't enough in the absence of sourcing.
I checked Google, GBooks, GNews, and found very little. The one book result is a first-person account of running a triathalon, and the result from Dignitas International says right at the bottom that he works for them, so it isn't independent. Otherwise all coverage is local to Toronto. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 16:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. SmartSE ( talk) 20:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial sources. reddogsix ( talk) 16:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not yet seem to pass WP:GNG. Google News only gives a few results, and they all seem to be routine coverage only. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced atticle about yet another putative musical genre, something the world needs like a hole in the head. Actually there was an interesting programme on the wireless yesterday about trepanning; on second thoughts that should be even less than a hole in the head. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The references are mere mentions and are not about the entity. A google news search shows no results of actual articles about this person. The edit history showed that it failed AFC and was published anyways. It looks like an advert created to promote a politician on Wikipedia. CerealKillerYum ( talk) 15:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable junior college not listed in the Pune school lists. No significant coverage provided, only some random profile articles with passing mentions or the school website. Article was created by a user blocked for COI. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 15:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:08, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NMEDIA. MT Train Discuss 14:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Speedied this, but the speedy removed cos there is sourcing. The editor who removed the speedy replaced it with a PROD, commenting that the coverage was run-of-the-mill. Which I agree with. And the PROD removed by (eyes do not widen in disbelief) by page creator. In a word. fails WP:GNG. TheLongTone ( talk) 14:36, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ignored sock vote Spartaz Humbug! 00:25, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
[Non-notable individual who fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.223.41.59 ( talk) 04:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 19:02, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN as an unsuccessful candidate for public office. All of the coverage surrounding him is about his campaigns and he doesn't therefore meet WP:GNG. Marquardtika ( talk) 18:33, 8 February 2018 (UTC) I would support redirecting this article to United States House of Representatives elections in New Jersey, 2018 per the standard outcomes at WP:POLOUTCOMES. 19:27, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Comment- As pointed out by Bearcat above, I've got to say that the sourcing for this particular article is incredibly weak even when compared to other unelected candidates. Other one Newark Star-Ledger article and the subruban news article mentioned above, I wouldn't consider any of the current sourcing in the article to be reliable. And the Star-Ledger articlesaren't even exclusively about the subject so the requirement for in-depth coverage is not met. The only in-depth rs coverage comes from the local Morristown Daily Record and that's just one article. I don't see this article passing WP:GNG under any circumstance.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 01:22, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:11, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
This article is about a book and appears to have been written by one of the book's authors. I have been unable to find any reviews of this book online and believe it fails WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete: insufficiently notable American actress. Quis separabit? 03:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, as per the article it is a "small sandstone quarry", so I really don't see its significance. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After two relistings, no consensus for a particular outcome has emerged in this discussion. Sources were presented later in the discussion by a user, but no other participants have provided a critique of those sources. Also, the second delete !vote (after the nomination) appears to be assessing notability based upon the sources presently in the article, which differ from those presented later in the discussion. Note that per WP:NEXIST, topic notability is to be based upon overall available suitable sources about a topic, rather than the state of sourcing in articles. North America 1000 19:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing significant. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 14:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The "Summer Language Bursary Program" was created in 1971 and renamed to Explore in 2004.
The abstract of the 17-page article notes:
Canada's Summer Language Bursary Program is a joint national-provincial effort providing immersion in French- or English-as-a-Second-Language to Canadian students. Despite 18 years of success and the benefits gained at small expense, the program is not well-known and risks losing funding. Self-promotion and lobbying are necessary. (Author/MSE)
The book notes:
The Summer Language Bursary Program (SLBP) is an important program for Canadian students that supports end of secondary and postsecondary French and English learning <www.cmec.ca/olp/, 1999>. Intensive 5-week immersion courses in either or both languages, supplemented with cultural activities and contact with native speakers, are run by some 40 postsecondary institutions across Canada for students between Grade 11 (Quebec high school graduation) and second-year university. Bursaries, awarded across the country by lottery, defray the cost of tuition, instructional materials, and living expenses for between 3,000 and 4,000 Canadian students each summer. The program is funded by the Department of Canadian Heritage and administered by the government department responsible for postsecondary education in each of the provinces and territories in conjunction with the Council of Ministers of Education (Department of Canadian Heritage, 1999).
The Official Languages Monitor Program (OLMP) is another program that encourages postsecondary langauge learning and that provides financial aid to students. It is also funded by the Department of Canadian Heritage. The Program is for bilingual postsecondary students who agree to study outside of their home province, usually in an area where their second official language is dominant. They work in tutorial or teacher's aid positions in schools or postsecondary institutions in their first language and receive fellowships to help cover their tuition fees. This program benefits not only the over 1,000 students who participate annually but also the second language programs in which they work (Department of Canadian Heritage, 1999).
The book notes:
The Canadian government also created two programs related to official languages in education outside of the BEP umbrella. The Summer Language Bursary Program was launched in 1971 to provide grants to postsecondary students who wanted to undergo a short-term intensive training program in their second-language during the summer months. In 1973 this was followed up with the Official Language Monitors Program, under which students from either official languages would work together with a teacher in a school where their language was the minority-language. These programs were funded completely by the federal government and administered by the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC).
The book also notes:
... Feeling specifically targeted by the federal government, Quebec refused to commit itself to future involvement in the Summer Language Bursary and Official Language Monitors programs (which were normall negotiated separately) until the BEP issue was settled, effectively freezing these two programs. (The Summer Language Bursary Program allowed university students to travel to another province to spend several weeks learning their second language in an immersion environment. The Official Language Monitors Program paid university students, usually from French-language communities, to work as teaching assistants with second-language teachers.)
The article notes:
In addition to the adult-oriented programs listed above, Canadians can participate in intensive immersion courses through the federally sponsored Explore program (cf. The Council of Ministers of Education, Canada 2012). This program provides students with a $2,200 bursary that covers tuition, meals and accommodation for five weeks in the spring or summer. It is an opportunity for francophones to immerse themselves in English and for anglophones to immerse themselves in French. The bursary is not guaranteed and is distributed through a lottery system. Successful applicants are placed in one of 30 different institutions for the study of French (mainly, but not exclusively, in Quebec).
The article notes:
Founded in 1971, the Explore Program was created with the intent of providing students with opportunities to learn French in an immersive cultural experience.
The five-week program has spring and summer sessions, consisting mostly of high school and university students who travel to over 20 participating institutions. The Explore Program (age 18+) and Destination Clic (grades 8-9) are funded through the Council of Minsters of Education, Canada (CMEC).
For Explore, most full-time applicants will receive a bursary to the tune of $2,200 (per student), paid directly to the institution to cover tuition, accommodation, food, and recreational and leisure activities. It’s a significant government investment in developing Francophone language and heritage across Canada.
I couldn’t find numbers of how many students go through the program every year, but it’s so popular that there’s actually a lottery draw for applicants. The most popular destinations (Montreal and Quebec City) are invariably oversubscribed, so most students wishing to attend school within Quebec usually end up in a smaller town like Trois-Rivières or Chicoutimi.
The book notes:
In 1971, the Secretary of State started funding the Summer Language Bursary Program (renamed the Explore Program in 2004), administered by the Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC), permitting university-aged students to spend several weeks immersed in the other language community. In 1973, it added the Official Languages Monitor Program (renamed the Odyssey Program in 2004), also with the CMEC, that funded university-aged students to work as teachers' language assistants in communities across the country.
The result was keep. Per the uncontested sources proffered by Cunard. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
I can't see how this meets WP:CORP. It's an architecture practice, and has worked on several notable buildings; some of that work has received coverage in the press, and the company has been mentioned in that context. It received a nomination for the Stirling Prize in 2011. Apart from a couple of sentences in this book, I can find no significant in-depth coverage of the company itself. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 13:44, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
References
From https://www.amazon.com/Bennetts-Associates-Commentaries-Peter-Carolin/dp/1904772153:
Since its foundation in 1987, Bennetts Associates has won numerous awards for its work and has established itself in the UK as one of the leading architecture practices of its generation. This is the first book to examine the firm's ethos and the themes behind its buildings. Four aspects of Bennetts Associates' work are considered in depth-Perception, Form, Construction and Process-drawing on over 30 built projects in detail, as well as many others in various stages of design and construction. These projects, include Hampstead Theatre, the Wessex Water Headquarters, Brighton Central Library and the New Street Square development in the City of London.
Each of the underlying themes is examined in turn by four well-known writers or commentators - academics Richard Weston and Peter Carolin, design process theorist Frank Duffy and art consultant Vivien Lovell.
The book notes:
Queen Elizabeth II Court is the headquarters of Hampshire County Council (HCC), which carries out administrative functions for a large area of southern England. The building (known formerly as Ashburton Court) houses today 1,100 staff although, when constructed in 1960, it housed only 600. Hence, this example of eco-refurbishment is not only the result of green retrofitting but of improving the efficiency and intensity of the use of office space. The project was undertaken by architects Bennetts Associates, one of the UK's most successful designers of green buildings.
The book notes:
Rab Bennetts founded the eponymous Bennetts Associates Architects and is one of the leading proponents of green buildings in the United Kingdom. Bennetts is well known for several landmark projects, including the Brighton Library. He started the firm in 1987 and now employs about seventy people at two offices in London and Edinburgh.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
The article does not prove its subject to be notable. It looks like a run-of-the-mill mobile app, like billions of others, that come and go every day. (Actually, the article is about an app, a company and a scheme.) It does not seem to have any impact. Codename Lisa ( talk) 07:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 09:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Non notable actress. unreliable sources and no notable works or awards whatsoever. Mar11 ( talk) 07:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 03:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly an in detail. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO as the XRCO Award category ("Unsung Siren") is not significant and well known. Significant RS coverage not found. Being on a list of "Ten Underrated Porn Performers We Love" strongly suggests a lack of notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
[[
WP:BASIC]]
/[[
WP:GNG]]
have not been found.
Sam
Sailor
22:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that this meets WP:ORG Most reliable sources are typical news reports; no indication that this passes WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:ORGIND. Bneu2013 ( talk) 06:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
This seems to be a case of WP:NOTINHERITED. Despite a very long list of references, none of them appear to discuss the subject in any depth. The article is basically just a resume and neither WP:CREATIVE or WP:BIO seem to be met. Note that some of the more RS referenced do not even mention the subject: e.g. [23] [24]. SmartSE ( talk) 14:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable homebrew software application that doesn't pass WP:GNG. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 15:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to The Zutons. Merge as you will Spartaz Humbug! 00:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
No notability outside the band, fails WP:GNG & WP:MBIO. — Za wl 09:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close I have returned it to draftspace. The article was unilaterally moved from draftspace to mainspace by someone other than the author or an AFC reviewer, it is in fact still pending review at AFC. . Roger (Dodger67) ( talk) 07:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not satisfy software notability or general notability based on in-depth independent coverage. The sources are not independent, but are associated with the developer. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to Philip Morris International#Controversies. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 01:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A non-notable organisation that doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. No coverage in significant reliable sources, with the only substantial coverage on the company being from wiki site SourceWatch which seems to source it's content from primary tobacco industry documents. No content worth saving, and the title would not be a plausible redirect. Kb.au ( talk) 23:01, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was merge to The Crow#In other media. J04n( talk page) 15:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Collectible card game that does not appear to pass notability guidelines. The only sources listed with substantial information are brandonlee.com and cardboardconnection, neither or which appear reliable. My own searches don't come up with any information. Pretty much just a one-time release of Crow-inspired cards that was really not notable. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:36, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Keep Merge -
El cid, el campeador's argument against the sources was: "the full on books are not books about the Crow", suggesting books need to be solely on one topic. But his own citing of Wikipolicy
WP:GNG says the opposite: "but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material."
Leitmotiv (
talk)
* Keep the game meets the GNG, in the specific sense (which is the only important sense) that the facts about its publication can be reliably sourced. There is no reason that WP should not have an article on every published CCG that meets this GNG requirement, regardless of whether or not people who don't play CCGs consider the game noteworthy. That subjective evaluation is not a GNG requirement. Newimpartial ( talk) 23:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz Humbug! 00:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Since neither of his companies are notable, I don't see how he is likely to be either. The many lists and notices he is on are PR, designed for that purpose and do not show notability no matter where they are published. Mentions in various books doesn't do it either. Created by an editor named "IranianEntrepreneurs", so it is almost certainly promotional editing. DGG ( talk ) 21:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:12, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Declined PROD. Non-notable local hotel Dough 4872 18:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Delete Mostly backed with primary sources so it is nothing more than self promotion. Mattg82 ( talk) 19:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Strong delete It is just one of the similarly sized hotels in an area. Acnetj ( talk) 21:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM Enwebb ( talk) 19:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 09:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
This disambiguation page was created with a list of entries that were all partial title matches. It was PRODed, deleted, recreated, PRODed again, deproded, and then trimmed down to its current state. Unless there are more entries to add, the page serves no discernible purpose. - Eureka Lott 05:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 01:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG. Only one of the three sources on the page even mentions him. He's deputy chief of staff for a Member of Congress, which doesn't make him notable. Marquardtika ( talk) 22:42, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Draftify.Best option since notability was failed to be well-established, by itself, in the course of the debate. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 00:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
fails WP:NORG a WP:SOAPBOX piece written by a user with a decalered WP:COI. The sources are either declared as having been written by members of the association (2, 5, 6, 7) the associations own web site, the profil of the association on the charity commission web site or 2 unverifable "assessments" which are not proof of notability even if they were verifiable. Dom from Paris ( talk) 09:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 00:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Not notable, also WP:NAD Enwebb ( talk) 05:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 09:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable child actress. No indication of notability. No real sources, other than IMDb. It was deleted at AFD in July 2011, and re-created eight months later. I started trying to find sources, and there's nothing really out there other than IMDb, which lists pretty much every actor, notable or not.
It is probably eligible for a G4 Speedy Deletion, but without having seen the prior deleted content, I can't say that it is a "sufficiently identical copy" of the deleted page. TJRC ( talk) 04:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 09:38, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Player is non-notable, because he has not appeared on the major league level. Fbdave ( talk) 04:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Seems like the claim of WP:JOURNALIST or WP:GNG being met don't hold up insofar as all the sources are contested on the grounds of non-independence or non-substantiveness, and these contestations have not been rebutted. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 20:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
fails to meet WP:JOURNALIST. no in-depth coverage in reliable , independent sources. many of the cited sources are either non-independent of the subject or are unreliable. Saqib ( talk) 04:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page for an unremarkable entrepreneur. Coverage is mostly hyper-local, such as The Desert Sun. There's one piece of international coverage "The US town that wants to become the best place to grow cannabis in the world", but its coverage of the subject is based on an interview and is not sufficient for notability, focusing on his hopes aspirations:
As a president of the local trade group, it's natural that he does a lot of self-promotion, but this does not amount to encyclopedia notability. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A directory-like listing on an unremarkable private company founded in 2009. Significant RS coverage not found. Fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Rejected multiple times at AfC and then moved to mainspace anyway. K.e.coffman ( talk) 03:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Rusf10 ( talk) 02:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Non-notable cemetery, fails WP:GNG. The current sourcing consists of the cemetery's website, a website that some guy created about local cemeteries, newjerseycivilwargravestones.org (also doesn't appear reliable), and obituaries for one of the people buried there (not significant coverage of the cemetery). A ** WP:BEFORE** search doesn't reveal much else. So the inevitable question does not come up, I oppose a merge since there is very little information about the cemetery or its importance, there is nothing worth merging to another article. Rusf10 ( talk) 03:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related page because the notability and sourcing problems are identical:
The result was redirect to Fairfield, Connecticut. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 00:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Despite the level of detail here, this middle school does not seem notable. Tacyarg ( talk) 02:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
This bio has been tagged as needing Verification since 2009. She won some local and state level titles but the page mainly details how she lost various state and national level events. Subject ffails WP:ENT which requires them to have a significant role in a significant event. Per WP:NOPAGE her wins are best presented on the corresponding lists. Her later work in event promotion does not convey wikipedia notability. Legacypac ( talk) 02:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:NPOL as a candidate in a US House primary, and no other claim of notability. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 01:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Outside of the billboard link above, he hasn't gotten much coverage about his managing of Bon Iver. However, he has gotten some very significant national press, most notably in the last 12 hours, for being the manager of a significant music group and running for congress:
ArtisticLaudableOwls ( talk) 01:53, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 09:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Ten years no references. I found no reliable ones. Rhadow ( talk) 00:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 00:37, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
A variety of problems here. The organization appears to be a defunct WP:BRANCH of a national organization. The page has be tagged for notability concerns, COI concerns and [WP:V]] for 8 years but no one has addressed these real issues. The business is dead now, website gone, which is the primary source for the data. With a couple of exceptions where a subject went on to become notable, the winners are not notable and don't have pages about them or even refs to support the names on the list. In short, a minor business which operated in a limited geographic region and is no more notable than any of the other minor pageants around the world. Legacypac ( talk) 00:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Also this topic was deleted in 2007 as not notable and a 2011 discussion failed to find concensus. Inclusion standards for companies WP:NCORP have risen substantially in the last few years. Legacypac ( talk) 00:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Mahmudiyah rape and killings#Steven Dale Green. And locked Spartaz Humbug! 00:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Procedural nomination of declined CSD G4 (recreation). I am not taking a position on this myself either way. The article failed AfD in 2009 on the grounds of BLP1E. The decision was upheld at DRV in 2014 but with no objection to recreation with new material. As far as I can tell, the only things that are substantially different are that the subject is now dead and that there have been a number of writings about him both academic and a play inspired by his life. However, all of these still essentially stem from the one event. The passage of time and the changed circumstances call for a new review at AfD rather than a speedy deletion. Spinning Spark 00:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
*Locked redirect. The first AfD was a proper close. While DRV didn't oppose recreation, but nothing more notable has actually happened. Niteshift36 ( talk) 14:23, 20 February 2018 (UTC)