![]() |
The result was merge to Thanksgiving (United States). (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
discussion for whether this is a suitable standalone article after being split from Thanksgiving (United States) Prisencolin ( talk) 21:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Robot combat. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of passing GNG. External links that are active relate to RoboGames and not Combots. LukeSurl t c 20:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Orangemike. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 03:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual who fails WP:NACTOR. The article subject is described on the article as a costume designer, but a search turned up no in-depth information on that claim, so the article most likely fails WP:CREATIVE as well. SamHolt6 ( talk) 17:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 09:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
This seems to be a page for a city that is already covered at Al-Rahbah. If so, should be deleted and made into a redirect. Can an expert (or someone with passing understanding of city names in Yemen) weigh in? Owlsmcgee ( talk) 17:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Original research. "Romance-speaking Asia" returns only Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirrors. It's not a natural search term and the article duplicates content from the main Romance languages article and various others, a lot of which has simply been copy and pasted. No evidence that "Romance-speaking Asia" is a topic in its own right. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 16:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Some "keep" opinions are pretty weak, but the "delete" side's counting of scholarly articles isn't exactly hard science either. Ultimately this is, as with many scholars, a matter of editorial judgment, and we don't currently have agreement about whether she's notable enough as a scientist or university official to merit inclusion. Sandstein 08:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Not many sources discuss her. Not a prolific researcher. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – Joe ( talk) 16:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
I can't find any in-depth coverage of this in any searches. Some brief mentions of EPSCoR, but nothing about this attention consortium. Article was created by a COI editor who has since been blocked. Onel5969 TT me 14:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – Joe ( talk) 16:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Promotional article for non notable blog/website masquerading as newspaper. Referenced with 3 sources back to the website WP:SELFPUBLISH, one unreliable blog/forum and namedropping with Alexa rank. Fails WP:WEB completely and nothing about this blog in any RS — Ammarpad ( talk) 12:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – Joe ( talk) 17:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable book lacking non-trivial support. Nothing comes up searching for ""Little George and The Christmas Socks" in Googl reddogsix ( talk) 12:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 23:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is original research from 2004. The topic is notable but duplicates quality articles including Apollo Command/Service Module, Orion Service Module, Zvezda (ISS module), all well supported, and Soyuz. This article adds nothing to the encyclopedia. Fails WP:V. A PROD was reverted without improvement. Rhadow ( talk) 17:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Zvezda is...Zvezda, not "Zvezda Service Module"and yet the lead of wikipedia's article on Zvezda says
also known as the Zvezda Service Module. Rhadow includes completely irrelevant/spurious claims in the nomination (eg, "a PROD was reverted without improvement" — reverting a PROD does not carry any requirement that the article be improved). – Gpc62 ( talk) 05:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The article has been at enWP for ten+ years, and has not progressed and still does not have independent references that demonstrate any notability. Makes unsupported claims, and reads as still being as light advertising as initially created. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW and WP:CSD#A7 apply here. Additionally, Wikipedia strongly discourages autobiographies. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 01:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Self created article with no claim to notability, a programmer who runs an advice blog and boasts 250 customers doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG and there are no sources cited. Speedy deletion tag was removed by Ammarpad so here we are. Melcous ( talk) 11:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
I know that Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, but I have created this article as a biography of a person of importance in his country and famous for his specialty. My comment to your audience is that today we find in Wikipedia 10,000+ profiles for people who may be less important or higher than me. If you see my profile contains something against the Wikipedia rules please mention it or modify it This page is for you but I do not think my page contains anything outside the Wikipedia rules Hope you a good day . AbdullahOfficial ( talk) 7:39, 25 November 2017 (+2:00)
Ok, ladies and gentlemen, if this thing bothers you and outside the Wikipedia laws, I apply to delete my account and my page in Wikipedia.
Thank you @ ~dom Kaos~ , @ John Pack Lambert , @ ~dom Kaos~ ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdullahOfficial ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you @ ~dom Kaos~ again for your reply. Before I list my page in Wikipedia, I have learned how to write a CV correctly without mistakes, even if you now see my resume you will see that everything was written correctly with all the information added. Experienced managers will not contribute effectively to the development of Wikipedia where I see daily. Many managers and supervisors delete entire articles or change them according to their personal opinions.
GMG Perhaps your words are only To implement Wikipedia laws. No more. Although I see many articles in Wikipedia, it is a biography of designers, programmers and photographers. Perhaps if we talking more, the discussion would not end. What did you decide about my page? If your decision is to delete the page, please delete it now I was happy to talk with you, I wish you a good day — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdullahOfficial ( talk • contribs) 12:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Wrong venue Use WP:RfD instead ( non-admin closure) {{repeat|p|3}}ery ( talk) 16:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect with some strange letters instead of name in English Wikisaurus ( talk) 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Wrong venue Use WP:RfD instead ( non-admin closure) {{repeat|p|3}}ery ( talk) 16:05, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect with some strange letters instead of name in English Wikisaurus ( talk) 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Wrong venue Use WP:RfD instead ( non-admin closure) {{repeat|p|3}}ery ( talk) 16:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect with some strange letters instead of name in English Wikisaurus ( talk) 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Wrong venue Use WP:RfD instead ( non-admin closure) {{repeat|p|3}}ery ( talk) 16:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect with some strange letters instead of name in English Wikisaurus ( talk) 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Deleted (G11) by RHAworth - Just to note there's currently an MFD at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dj Lytmas which was the first article on Lytmas to be created, Thanks, (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 13:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Promotional bio of non notable musician who fails WP:MUSICBIO and lacks significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Referenced poorly with bunch of totally unreliable blog sources. Originally created as VJ LYTMAS and one user requested userfication. Now it is rebranded with fake/customized name and moved to mainspace to circumvent review and further the promotion campaign. — Ammarpad ( talk) 09:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not establish product notability. Primarily promotional in tone. Google search does not find third-party coverage, only its own coverage. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSOFTWARE. I didn't find in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Rentier ( talk) 00:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Bauksitt ( talk) 00:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Wheelchair. The consensus is more or less evenly split on whether to delete or merge, but per WP:PRESERVE I will err towards giving editors the chance to salvage what material they can. – Joe ( talk) 16:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Are these things actually in current production? Or is it, like the talk page says, something that only about a countable number of people actually use? That seems to be the case. This should be deleted. Maybe they can be mentioned in the wheelchair article, but this article is misleading. It suggests that they are in current production like wheelchairs, which doesn't seem to really be the case. RightGot ( talk) 01:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Evernight (series). (non-admin closure) J 947 ( c · m) 05:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Nominating for deletion per WP:NOT. This is incredibly detailed WP:Fancruft listing everything about every character for a book series that is not even highly notable to begin with. Even if the fancruft were removed, the existence of this page does not seem to be warranted. Lapislazulia ( talk) 03:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails to satisfy the criteria of WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. Non-notable senior public servant - just being the chairman of a state government agency does not confer automatic notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 05:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Dan arndt ( talk) 05:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
One source only for this article. Other sources that can be found are not reliable or newsworthy. He's only known for this one act, and he's out of the spotlight for quite some time now. FiendYT ★ 05:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 23:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Not a notable army officer. Searches doesn't show anything to establish the subject's notability. Per WP:SOLDIER, generally officers of three-star rank i.e. Lieutenant general, or above, are considered notable. Two-star rank officers aren't notable unless they have any other significant contribution or role, which is not the case here. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Non notable composer, musician, arranger and all his array of professions. WP:BEFORE reveals no WP:RS about this person that can prove WP:SIGCOV because of both lack of independent and significant coverage. Among his array of professions I can clearly say he met none WP:AUTHOR, WP:ACADEMIC and generally fails the basic criterion for inclusion WP:GNG — Ammarpad ( talk) 04:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Mayor of a small city (pop ~100,000). No other notable factors about him. There are thousands of mayors of small towns. I don't think that merits an encyclopedia article. MartinezMD ( talk) 00:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Linguist un Eins uno 18:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not satisfy film notability guidelines (and that guideline was misinterpreted in moving from draft into article space). The film is in principal photography. Unreleased films that are in principal photography are only notable if the production itself is notable. This article says nothing about the production except that it is in progress. This article is therefore promotional.
The guideline is usually misinterpreted about films that are in principal photography, but it is still the guideline. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable, unsourced concert tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR that has been tagged as being unreferenced for seventh months. The article was deprodded, [6], after less than an hour without an explanation or sources added to the article. Aspects ( talk) 03:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Carrite: are the sources covering the artist or the tour? Furthermore, what makes this tour notable enough for a standalone article, instead of being covered within the page for the artist or the album the tour was meant to promote? Ham tech person 03:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Only sources are primary (interviews), so it doesn't appear to pass WP:BIO. Non-notable designer. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 12:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Necrothesp with the following rationale "53 restaurants seems reasonable for an article". I disagree, having an x-outlets is not seen as a criteria of notability in any policy or guideline I am familiar with. A company can have hundreds of outlets and still be totally non-notable. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Article does not describe any reason company is notable and is very poorly written see Wikipedia:CORP Rusf10 ( talk)
The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 07:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:GNG. Has not received significant coverage outside of press releases and routine announcements. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 14:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Grapefruit17 ( talk) 20:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. Page already deleted by Jinian under CSD:A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events) (non-admin closure) CThomas3 ( talk) 19:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Promotional bio of Non notable musician who fails WP:MUSICBIO and fails WP:GNG totally. A fair search shows nothing about him in reliable sources while mere look at the article will corroborate this. References are link to download his music, external links are collection of his Facebook and YouTube accounts; just narrowely missed CSD due to unreferenced claims of significance — Ammarpad ( talk) 03:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This article has a *ton* of issues. References seem to only confirm the subject's place of employment, and many claims of what the subject has done ("In 1989 he helped coordinate solidarity efforts in Massachusetts during a successful three-month strike by 60,000 telephone workers against health care benefit cost-shifting," "As the founding director in the early 1990s, Wilson spearheaded efforts in Massachusetts to support legislation for universal health care and against international trade deals like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO)," and "While working for SEIU, he helped revive the Jobs with Justice Health Care Action Committee – pushing for coordinated actions by union members to link their struggles against cost shifting with the broader movement for health care reform" to list a few) are unsupported. The subject of the article actively edited this page up until earlier this year. None of this is up to snuff with wikipedia's standards, and the only verifiable claims made by citations are "Rand Wilson has worked several jobs." The subject was deemed Notable after a 2010 AfD, though any sourcing provided toward notability seems to have been removed or now lead to dead links. I've removed uncited claims after attempting to find sources that indicate Mr. Wilson was especially notable during the efforts listed and finding none. This page is heavily flawed and unnecessary, therefore I am nominating it for deletion. Jjgaybrams ( talk) 17:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was boldly moved to Draft:Bo Lacy, where it must be improved (the sources provided by WikiOriginal-9 would likely be a good start), or will end up being deleted for abandonment. Subject probably meets the GNG, but that is not evident from the current state of the article. bd2412 T 13:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Lacy played football for Arkansas and was all-conference at least once, but I can't find any national awards or any other significant coverage (there was the one time that he shoved a thong-wearing streaker). Was a sixth-round draft pick but never played in the NFL regular season. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 19:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
promotional bio created by a SPA.. no in depth coverage on the subject. Saqib ( talk) 06:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion following relisting. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
This is a short story with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. The sourcing in the article consist of primary sources and twitter, facebook and IMDB which are not reliable source. Whpq ( talk) 13:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Self promotional article... inappropriate as per WP:COI and WP:RESUME Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Delete. I am quite surprised my Speedy tag was removed. It's obviously self promotion with no evidence for notability. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 20:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
"...the person has held the post of president or chancellor (or vice-chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant accredited college or university, director of a highly regarded, notable academic independent research institute...". This quote further shows why your " bitterly fails" is not correct. He is currently director of notable government agency National Information Technology Development Agency. I initially supported deleting this article not because I am afraid she'll not meet Wikipedia notability but because it t was in this shoddy shape and I said this upfront since day 1. – Ammarpad ( talk) 12:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Aditya: I have already expressed my thought above early and later after your rescue efforts, I changed position. My reply to your comment is only to bring to light what policy/guideline actually say after I actually saw you give one non policy/guideline-based "delete!" big recognition. (You can reread your comment). So if this resulted in kept, your work and other editors surely will count, so I am not belittling it. Second, I actually know almost all SNGs are more stringent than GNG and I didn't say the opposite in my reply. I don't know whether you really understand me. There's big difference between my word " supersede" and (be more) "stringent". Thanks – Ammarpad ( talk) 10:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Goodman Fielder. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
catalog pagewith no encyclopedic information DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was merge to Thanksgiving (United States). (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
discussion for whether this is a suitable standalone article after being split from Thanksgiving (United States) Prisencolin ( talk) 21:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Robot combat. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of passing GNG. External links that are active relate to RoboGames and not Combots. LukeSurl t c 20:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Orangemike. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 03:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual who fails WP:NACTOR. The article subject is described on the article as a costume designer, but a search turned up no in-depth information on that claim, so the article most likely fails WP:CREATIVE as well. SamHolt6 ( talk) 17:30, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 09:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
This seems to be a page for a city that is already covered at Al-Rahbah. If so, should be deleted and made into a redirect. Can an expert (or someone with passing understanding of city names in Yemen) weigh in? Owlsmcgee ( talk) 17:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Original research. "Romance-speaking Asia" returns only Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirrors. It's not a natural search term and the article duplicates content from the main Romance languages article and various others, a lot of which has simply been copy and pasted. No evidence that "Romance-speaking Asia" is a topic in its own right. Ivar the Boneful ( talk) 16:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Some "keep" opinions are pretty weak, but the "delete" side's counting of scholarly articles isn't exactly hard science either. Ultimately this is, as with many scholars, a matter of editorial judgment, and we don't currently have agreement about whether she's notable enough as a scientist or university official to merit inclusion. Sandstein 08:12, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Not many sources discuss her. Not a prolific researcher. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 16:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – Joe ( talk) 16:07, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
I can't find any in-depth coverage of this in any searches. Some brief mentions of EPSCoR, but nothing about this attention consortium. Article was created by a COI editor who has since been blocked. Onel5969 TT me 14:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – Joe ( talk) 16:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Promotional article for non notable blog/website masquerading as newspaper. Referenced with 3 sources back to the website WP:SELFPUBLISH, one unreliable blog/forum and namedropping with Alexa rank. Fails WP:WEB completely and nothing about this blog in any RS — Ammarpad ( talk) 12:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – Joe ( talk) 17:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable book lacking non-trivial support. Nothing comes up searching for ""Little George and The Christmas Socks" in Googl reddogsix ( talk) 12:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. – Joe ( talk) 23:54, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This article is original research from 2004. The topic is notable but duplicates quality articles including Apollo Command/Service Module, Orion Service Module, Zvezda (ISS module), all well supported, and Soyuz. This article adds nothing to the encyclopedia. Fails WP:V. A PROD was reverted without improvement. Rhadow ( talk) 17:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Zvezda is...Zvezda, not "Zvezda Service Module"and yet the lead of wikipedia's article on Zvezda says
also known as the Zvezda Service Module. Rhadow includes completely irrelevant/spurious claims in the nomination (eg, "a PROD was reverted without improvement" — reverting a PROD does not carry any requirement that the article be improved). – Gpc62 ( talk) 05:08, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:34, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The article has been at enWP for ten+ years, and has not progressed and still does not have independent references that demonstrate any notability. Makes unsupported claims, and reads as still being as light advertising as initially created. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:59, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW and WP:CSD#A7 apply here. Additionally, Wikipedia strongly discourages autobiographies. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 01:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Self created article with no claim to notability, a programmer who runs an advice blog and boasts 250 customers doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG and there are no sources cited. Speedy deletion tag was removed by Ammarpad so here we are. Melcous ( talk) 11:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
I know that Wikipedia is not LinkedIn, but I have created this article as a biography of a person of importance in his country and famous for his specialty. My comment to your audience is that today we find in Wikipedia 10,000+ profiles for people who may be less important or higher than me. If you see my profile contains something against the Wikipedia rules please mention it or modify it This page is for you but I do not think my page contains anything outside the Wikipedia rules Hope you a good day . AbdullahOfficial ( talk) 7:39, 25 November 2017 (+2:00)
Ok, ladies and gentlemen, if this thing bothers you and outside the Wikipedia laws, I apply to delete my account and my page in Wikipedia.
Thank you @ ~dom Kaos~ , @ John Pack Lambert , @ ~dom Kaos~ ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdullahOfficial ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you @ ~dom Kaos~ again for your reply. Before I list my page in Wikipedia, I have learned how to write a CV correctly without mistakes, even if you now see my resume you will see that everything was written correctly with all the information added. Experienced managers will not contribute effectively to the development of Wikipedia where I see daily. Many managers and supervisors delete entire articles or change them according to their personal opinions.
GMG Perhaps your words are only To implement Wikipedia laws. No more. Although I see many articles in Wikipedia, it is a biography of designers, programmers and photographers. Perhaps if we talking more, the discussion would not end. What did you decide about my page? If your decision is to delete the page, please delete it now I was happy to talk with you, I wish you a good day — Preceding unsigned comment added by AbdullahOfficial ( talk • contribs) 12:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Wrong venue Use WP:RfD instead ( non-admin closure) {{repeat|p|3}}ery ( talk) 16:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect with some strange letters instead of name in English Wikisaurus ( talk) 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Wrong venue Use WP:RfD instead ( non-admin closure) {{repeat|p|3}}ery ( talk) 16:05, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect with some strange letters instead of name in English Wikisaurus ( talk) 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Wrong venue Use WP:RfD instead ( non-admin closure) {{repeat|p|3}}ery ( talk) 16:04, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect with some strange letters instead of name in English Wikisaurus ( talk) 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Wrong venue Use WP:RfD instead ( non-admin closure) {{repeat|p|3}}ery ( talk) 16:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Redirect with some strange letters instead of name in English Wikisaurus ( talk) 08:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Deleted (G11) by RHAworth - Just to note there's currently an MFD at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dj Lytmas which was the first article on Lytmas to be created, Thanks, (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 13:09, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Promotional bio of non notable musician who fails WP:MUSICBIO and lacks significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Referenced poorly with bunch of totally unreliable blog sources. Originally created as VJ LYTMAS and one user requested userfication. Now it is rebranded with fake/customized name and moved to mainspace to circumvent review and further the promotion campaign. — Ammarpad ( talk) 09:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not establish product notability. Primarily promotional in tone. Google search does not find third-party coverage, only its own coverage. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:25, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NSOFTWARE. I didn't find in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Rentier ( talk) 00:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Bauksitt ( talk) 00:20, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Wheelchair. The consensus is more or less evenly split on whether to delete or merge, but per WP:PRESERVE I will err towards giving editors the chance to salvage what material they can. – Joe ( talk) 16:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Are these things actually in current production? Or is it, like the talk page says, something that only about a countable number of people actually use? That seems to be the case. This should be deleted. Maybe they can be mentioned in the wheelchair article, but this article is misleading. It suggests that they are in current production like wheelchairs, which doesn't seem to really be the case. RightGot ( talk) 01:56, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Evernight (series). (non-admin closure) J 947 ( c · m) 05:39, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Nominating for deletion per WP:NOT. This is incredibly detailed WP:Fancruft listing everything about every character for a book series that is not even highly notable to begin with. Even if the fancruft were removed, the existence of this page does not seem to be warranted. Lapislazulia ( talk) 03:06, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 13:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails to satisfy the criteria of WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. Non-notable senior public servant - just being the chairman of a state government agency does not confer automatic notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 05:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC) Dan arndt ( talk) 05:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
One source only for this article. Other sources that can be found are not reliable or newsworthy. He's only known for this one act, and he's out of the spotlight for quite some time now. FiendYT ★ 05:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 23:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Not a notable army officer. Searches doesn't show anything to establish the subject's notability. Per WP:SOLDIER, generally officers of three-star rank i.e. Lieutenant general, or above, are considered notable. Two-star rank officers aren't notable unless they have any other significant contribution or role, which is not the case here. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 04:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Non notable composer, musician, arranger and all his array of professions. WP:BEFORE reveals no WP:RS about this person that can prove WP:SIGCOV because of both lack of independent and significant coverage. Among his array of professions I can clearly say he met none WP:AUTHOR, WP:ACADEMIC and generally fails the basic criterion for inclusion WP:GNG — Ammarpad ( talk) 04:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Mayor of a small city (pop ~100,000). No other notable factors about him. There are thousands of mayors of small towns. I don't think that merits an encyclopedia article. MartinezMD ( talk) 00:41, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Linguist un Eins uno 18:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Does not satisfy film notability guidelines (and that guideline was misinterpreted in moving from draft into article space). The film is in principal photography. Unreleased films that are in principal photography are only notable if the production itself is notable. This article says nothing about the production except that it is in progress. This article is therefore promotional.
The guideline is usually misinterpreted about films that are in principal photography, but it is still the guideline. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable, unsourced concert tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR that has been tagged as being unreferenced for seventh months. The article was deprodded, [6], after less than an hour without an explanation or sources added to the article. Aspects ( talk) 03:56, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Carrite: are the sources covering the artist or the tour? Furthermore, what makes this tour notable enough for a standalone article, instead of being covered within the page for the artist or the album the tour was meant to promote? Ham tech person 03:20, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Only sources are primary (interviews), so it doesn't appear to pass WP:BIO. Non-notable designer. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 12:06, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Necrothesp with the following rationale "53 restaurants seems reasonable for an article". I disagree, having an x-outlets is not seen as a criteria of notability in any policy or guideline I am familiar with. A company can have hundreds of outlets and still be totally non-notable. As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Article does not describe any reason company is notable and is very poorly written see Wikipedia:CORP Rusf10 ( talk)
The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 07:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:GNG. Has not received significant coverage outside of press releases and routine announcements. Hirolovesswords ( talk) 14:53, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Grapefruit17 ( talk) 20:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was Procedural close. Page already deleted by Jinian under CSD:A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events) (non-admin closure) CThomas3 ( talk) 19:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Promotional bio of Non notable musician who fails WP:MUSICBIO and fails WP:GNG totally. A fair search shows nothing about him in reliable sources while mere look at the article will corroborate this. References are link to download his music, external links are collection of his Facebook and YouTube accounts; just narrowely missed CSD due to unreferenced claims of significance — Ammarpad ( talk) 03:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
This article has a *ton* of issues. References seem to only confirm the subject's place of employment, and many claims of what the subject has done ("In 1989 he helped coordinate solidarity efforts in Massachusetts during a successful three-month strike by 60,000 telephone workers against health care benefit cost-shifting," "As the founding director in the early 1990s, Wilson spearheaded efforts in Massachusetts to support legislation for universal health care and against international trade deals like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO)," and "While working for SEIU, he helped revive the Jobs with Justice Health Care Action Committee – pushing for coordinated actions by union members to link their struggles against cost shifting with the broader movement for health care reform" to list a few) are unsupported. The subject of the article actively edited this page up until earlier this year. None of this is up to snuff with wikipedia's standards, and the only verifiable claims made by citations are "Rand Wilson has worked several jobs." The subject was deemed Notable after a 2010 AfD, though any sourcing provided toward notability seems to have been removed or now lead to dead links. I've removed uncited claims after attempting to find sources that indicate Mr. Wilson was especially notable during the efforts listed and finding none. This page is heavily flawed and unnecessary, therefore I am nominating it for deletion. Jjgaybrams ( talk) 17:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was boldly moved to Draft:Bo Lacy, where it must be improved (the sources provided by WikiOriginal-9 would likely be a good start), or will end up being deleted for abandonment. Subject probably meets the GNG, but that is not evident from the current state of the article. bd2412 T 13:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Lacy played football for Arkansas and was all-conference at least once, but I can't find any national awards or any other significant coverage (there was the one time that he shoved a thong-wearing streaker). Was a sixth-round draft pick but never played in the NFL regular season. EricEnfermero ( Talk) 19:50, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
promotional bio created by a SPA.. no in depth coverage on the subject. Saqib ( talk) 06:28, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion following relisting. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
This is a short story with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. The sourcing in the article consist of primary sources and twitter, facebook and IMDB which are not reliable source. Whpq ( talk) 13:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Self promotional article... inappropriate as per WP:COI and WP:RESUME Catfish Jim and the soapdish 15:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Delete. I am quite surprised my Speedy tag was removed. It's obviously self promotion with no evidence for notability. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 20:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
"...the person has held the post of president or chancellor (or vice-chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant accredited college or university, director of a highly regarded, notable academic independent research institute...". This quote further shows why your " bitterly fails" is not correct. He is currently director of notable government agency National Information Technology Development Agency. I initially supported deleting this article not because I am afraid she'll not meet Wikipedia notability but because it t was in this shoddy shape and I said this upfront since day 1. – Ammarpad ( talk) 12:27, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Aditya: I have already expressed my thought above early and later after your rescue efforts, I changed position. My reply to your comment is only to bring to light what policy/guideline actually say after I actually saw you give one non policy/guideline-based "delete!" big recognition. (You can reread your comment). So if this resulted in kept, your work and other editors surely will count, so I am not belittling it. Second, I actually know almost all SNGs are more stringent than GNG and I didn't say the opposite in my reply. I don't know whether you really understand me. There's big difference between my word " supersede" and (be more) "stringent". Thanks – Ammarpad ( talk) 10:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Goodman Fielder. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:04, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
catalog pagewith no encyclopedic information DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 24 November 2017 (UTC)