![]() |
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not satisfy athletic notability. YouTube is not a reliable source. Wikipedia is not a source. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:CRYSTAL. Not sure if would be notable even after released. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 23:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
As per WP:CRYSTAL. This tournament is likely to happen in 2018, however as none of the feeder tounaments to decide the participating teams have yet to be played, it is too early for this tournament to have an article. The venue is, as yet, undecided as well. PinchHittingLeggy ( talk) 22:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Artist of questionable notability. Article was nominated by an IP without followup, but upon inspection I found nothing to satisfy WP:ARTIST and little if anything that comes close to meet WP:GNG--cited sources appear to be run-of-the-mill local reviews. Article creator and couple of contributors appear to be single-purpose accounts. -- Finngall talk 22:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
There are no WP articles for "Ashley Stones", her supposed third album Cherryade, or the other songs she supposedly recorded. Google searches do not show ay songs or albums by a "Ashley Stones". Although the producer is listed as Burns, this song or album are not listed among his production credits. Likewise it is not among the supposed songwriter Mark Taylor's credits. Bronwyn (singer), another article created by the article author, CqlebEllis, was deleted as "has yet to release anything". Ojorojo ( talk) 19:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Looks like you must do a WP:BEFORE search first before nominating anything for deletion. ( non-admin closure) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Recreated without going through DRV. Delete, salt, and add to title blacklist. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 18:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 21:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Very scant coverage fails to meet WP:CORP. The two sources available are a profile of the CEO, who has been editing this article ( User:Koliver2), and a bog-standard "companies being honored at a local awards ceremony" piece. Note that when searching the name, there are other companies known as Amelex with no relation to this one. Raymie ( t • c) 17:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 21:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Completely unsourced WP:BLP of a film editor and composer, whose only discernible claim of notability is that he's worked on films that exist. As always, a person in the film industry is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he has an IMDb profile -- he has to be the subject of reliable source coverage in media for a Wikipedia article to become earned. Bearcat ( talk) 17:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:TOOSOON article about a film which is only just now entering the production pipeline ("commenced principal photography on February 6, 2017" -- and that's not a typo, because one of the references here is a casting call dated December 2016). This is referenced exclusively to primary sources, except for a single glancing namecheck of its existence in a Playback article about its casting director -- and there's a conflict of interest here, as the article was created by a person with a direct professional relationship with the film's producer. As always, Wikipedia is not an advance publicity database on which a film gets to have a primary sourced article the moment it enters the production pipeline -- except very occasionally in the case of exceptionally high profile projects like Star Wars eps 8 and 9 where the media obsessively publish every scrap of advance information they can get their hands on, most films outside of that rarefied class of megaprojects don't get articles on here until they're actually released and garnering actual critical reviews to pass WP:NFILM. No prejudice against recreation if and when that happens, but today is not the time for an article about an indie film that is only just starting photography. Bearcat ( talk) 16:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Pleas note that I have corrected the verb tense from "commenced" to "commences."
Unfortunately, I have to once again correct Bearcat when he/she conflates by Wiki username "Davidjosephanselmo" with the person with the same name who is the CEO of a film studio in the city of Greater Sudbury, Ontario. Once again, this is incorrect as while my Wiki username is "Davidjosephanselmo" it is not my actual name LMFAO. Similar to how "Bearcat" is not a "bearcat" (whatever that may be) and his/her actual name is probably not "Bearcat." My username is an inside joke, and not my actual identity so there is NO conflict of interest. Furthermore, the feature Grim Trigger is NOT being produced in any way whatsoever with David Joseph Anselmo and/or his studio. Finally, I included in my sources an Ontario government link regarding its financial participation in Grim Trigger. Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 17:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Please note Bearcat that, once again, the feature Grim Trigger is NOT being produced in any way whatsoever with David Joseph Anselmo and/or his studio. Think of it this way: I have no relation to the now deceased Steve Jobs. Even if I create the Wiki username "Stevejobs" I still have no relation to Steve Jobs OTHER than the fact that I have used his hame as my Wiki username. And I might do this as an inside joke between myself and someone(s) else who is not or related to Steve Jobs. Make sense? Once again, my Wiki username "Davidjosephanselmo" is an inside joke, but it is not an inside joke between myself and David Joseph Anselmo. I can't make this ANYMORE clear. Hopefully you can now stop kicking this dead horse :) The film was mentioned as going into production in Playback magazine, which is Canada's version of the US's Variety. How does this "not assist notability"? Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 17:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Bearcat There is no relation between the feature Grim Trigger and the CEO of the film studio located in the same city that Grim Trigger is being produced. I just checked to see if this CEO was on IMDB, and he is under the name "David Anselmo" http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2156926/ . My Wiki username, "Davidjosephanselmo," which, again, I chose years ago, is not my actual name, nor am I trying to "impersonate" this CEO, who is not a celebrity or known in any significant way. I note that he does not have a Wiki page. I have never written anything on Wiki regarding this individual and/or his studio and/or his film & TV productions. Again, difficult to argue that I am impersonating someone with a project -- Grim Trigger -- that is in no way related to him. You claim to have made some "connection" with Grim Trigger because my Wiki username "Davidjosephanselmo" is very similar to this CEO "David Anselmo." Other than this connection, there is NO connection, and this CEO has no relation to Grim Trigger. I am not trying to make a connection between this CEO and Grim Trigger, you are. I am underlying that there is NO connection. Bearcat Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 18:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Once again, Bearcat, you are incorrect in that every article that I've ever created on Wiki "has been about either a person who works in Sudbury's film industry or a film made in Sudbury." If you consider "David Anselmo" (as he is listed on IMDB) to be the "alpha dog of Sudbury's film industry" then that is your prerogative. From what I know, he is best known as the Hallmark TV Movie-of-the Week producer, and his "studio" is actually an unconverted and dilapidated community skating arena. Regardless, you'll notice that non of those individuals that you have listed -- Zahra Golafshani, Ernest Riffe, Andrew David and Mathieu Séguin -- have anything to do with this same "David Anselmo," who, AGAIN, has nothing to do with Grim Trigger. You are proving my point that, once again, I am not this CEO, and this individual has, once again, nothing to do with Grim Trigger. Only in your mind Bearcat is there a connection between this CEO and Grim Trigger. Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 19:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Despite claims to the contrary by the OP, he has a COI in this article, and not hiding it well. Also under fits under WP:TOOSOON. JerrySa1 ( talk) 20:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable newly instantiated business award. Can't see how it's notable. scope_creep ( talk) 16:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a film producer, whose only discernible claim of notability is that he's worked on films that exist. The referencing here is a mix of primary sources and local media coverage in the city where he works, with no evidence shown that he's garnered any reliable source coverage beyond the purely local; there's also a conflict of interest here, as the article has been edited by a professional colleague of his. As always, film producers do not automatically get Wikipedia articles just because they have profiles on IMDb -- they must be sourceable as having achieved something that actually passes WP:CREATIVE. Bearcat ( talk) 16:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Neither a politician nor notable. Fails WP:BIO. Three references, ones a dud, other one points to a knowledge website where he has created an article, which doesn't affirm his claim that he is an author. Other ref is WSJ reporting he made CEO of christies. Not notable. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep ( talk) 16:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
PROD removed by author without explanation. A Google search result indicate a non-notable theme park. Fails GNG. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kurykh ( talk) 01:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. No indication of notability. scope_creep ( talk) 16:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a film editor, whose only discernible claim of notability is that he's worked on films that exist. This is sourced almost entirely to references that verify the existence of the films, while failing to contain any mention of Riffe at all -- and the only reference that does have his name in it is a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE. Further, there's a conflict of interest here, as the article was created by the CEO of the main film studio in the same city where Riffe works. As always, a person in the film industry is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he has an IMDb profile -- he has to be the subject of coverage in reliable sources, not just nominally verifiable as existing, to get an article on here. Bearcat ( talk) 16:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
"Even if you're telling the truth that you're not personally David Joseph Anselmo, it doesn't make that much difference. Any form of direct personal association with the article topics is a conflict of interest on here — so if you're in any sort of position in which using his name as your username can qualify as an "inside joke", then you still have a COI."
Bearcat, please note that I have zero direct personal association with the article topics so, once again, there is NO conflict of interest here. And I repeat, David Joseph Anselmo has absolutely nothing to do with this feature film. You, Bearcat, are the person who keeps making this claim that cannot be verified. Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 17:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Think of it this way: I have no relation to the now deceased Steve Jobs. Even if I create the Wiki username "Stevejobs" I still have no relation to Steve Jobs OTHER than the fact that I have used his hame as my Wiki username. And I might do this as an inside joke between myself and someone(s) else who is not or related to Steve Jobs. Make sense? Once again, my Wiki username "Davidjosephanselmo" is an inside joke, but it is not an inside joke between myself and David Joseph Anselmo. I can't make this ANYMORE clear. Hopefully you can now stop kicking this dead horse :) Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 17:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable WP:BLP of a self-published author and film director, can find no references about him aside from his own websites which have been listed as sources ABF99 ( talk) 15:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a director who has only made short films to date. Her only claim of notability is having won awards from the "local filmmakers" programming stream of the film festival in the city where she works, and her only sourceability is to the local media -- and there's a conflict of interest here, as the article was created by the CEO of the same city's primary film studio. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she accomplishes something more than locally notable and becomes more than locally sourceable, but Cinéfest is not a major enough film festival for its best short film award to carry a person over WP:CREATIVE all by itself. Bearcat ( talk) 15:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Described himself as Veteran corporate and political strategist. Major puff piece article that magically appeared fully formed, created by editor with SPA account User talk:Ejdooley. Not a politician. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep ( talk) 15:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
non notable logistics company, Fails NCORP & GNG – Davey2010 Talk 14:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Promotional article about a non-notable corporation. MER-C 13:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Drummed up bio about an author of some self-published books. No indication of any notability, does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 12:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Unfererenced article about non-notable software. MER-C 12:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD (with no explanation) - Article is an essay (see WP:NOTESSAY) and contains referenced statements, mixed with WP:SYNTH based on the article creator's personal opinion. It appears that this article was created as part of a project (see Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_North_Carolina_Wilmington/History_and_Methods_of_Infectious_Diseases_Research_(Spring_2017)) and when it first appeared in Article space I moved it back to the editor's sandbox, feeling that it was not ready to be a Wikipedia entry. The creator moved it back to article space over the redirect, which is why it appears that I have created this article - I'm definitely not the author. Exemplo347 ( talk) 12:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be a notable app; a search for coverage in reliable sources resulted mainly in false positives, passing mentions, or unreliable sites such as blogs and web forums. I couldn't find any significant reliable coverage about the app itself. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) Adam9007 ( talk) 17:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable band that fails WP:BAND. No mention on Discogs, Spotify, Napster. Only 18 members on sound cloud. Previously nominated for WP:AFD nomination several days ago, but no one noticed it with no votes. Completely non notable. scope_creep ( talk) 11:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a young Australian artist who is a self taught musician. She has overcome addiction and psychosis. She is growing an audience particularly through YouTube - videos range from a small audience of 3800 on up to over 1 million. She is starting to tour. So yes, she is new and the impact is small but it is growing. Removal seems inappropriate 184.70.125.198 ( talk) 16:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC) Also worth checking her website tashsultana.com which shows the sort of detail that merits keeping this entry.
The result was Speedily deleted by RHaworth (A10 of BansheePHP). ( non-admin closure) Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. No reliable independent references. Fails WP:GNG. One of very many content management systems, few of which have achieved notability Velella Velella Talk 10:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Antipolo. Black Kite (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
K-6 school, no meaningful external reliable source coverage (currently-cited sources are simply lists of schools.) NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 08:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
*Delete non notable encyclopedia material.I have an alternate account, User:BethOne .(
Cfgvhbj (
talk) 01:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)) false vote by an impersonating editor struck out
Velella
Velella Talk
01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
This researcher does not appear to fulfill the notability requirements for academics, with an h index of 12, a cite max of 101 and that (by some distance) highest-cited article co-authored as an undergrad, and no indications of recognized great influence in the field. - Much as I dislike judging academics by these metrics (my h-index makes me as notable as a dead fish) and despite my personal interest in this research topic, this is what the criteria on WP go by. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Here is my opinion on this https://sociobiology.wordpress.com/2017/02/04/is-wikipedia-anti-intellectual-compare-athletes-to-academics-and-the-answer-is-yes/ Agelaia ( talk) 20:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Not the subject of significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) No in-depth hits in a video game reliable sources custom, books, or regular Google searches, and no suitable redirect targets (isn't known as an employee or designer of a single company/game). czar 07:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
This article is original research. There are no independent secondary sources that I have found to assert that this is a notable topic. TheMagikCow ( talk) 16:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
W Nowicki, this kind of details for other software is presented as well in Wikipedia (you can check on this /info/en/?search=Category:Software_version_histories any software, for example, Yahoo! Messenger version history ). What's the difference between Vivaldi version history page and Yahoo! messenger version history page? Shpankov ( talk) 18:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
OK, the page was merged with the main article. This article can be deleted. Shpankov ( talk) 08:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kurykh ( talk) 01:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Small -- hell, tiny -- Toronto retailer. It's claims to fame are as "the first brand in Canada to partner with a medical-marijuana producer to offer legally branded Cannabis" and "the first Canadian cannabis consumer brand to raise capital" -- neither of which milestones has attracted any real attention. Calton | Talk 18:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Secondary schools are generally assumed notable; however, we have to consider other issues - as pointed out by the Delete voters, this article is almost completely promotional, and only sourced to the school's own sources and so there is no verifiability. TNT applies - there is an article to be written here, just not this one. Black Kite (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of third-party notability. Google search finds the usual vanity coverage, but no third-party coverage. Note that author stated, in removing the PROD, that they were initiating an extensive PR effort to find sources. Wikipedia isn't driven by PR. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
I, Wanda Raskin, am the MarCom Administrator for Delta English School. I have only made edits to Delta English School's article on Wikipedia because I am employed by this institution. Based upon request by Delta English School's parent community, I decided to create a Wikipedia article for the institution as none exist at the moment. I noticed that the article has been orphaned and tagged for deletion. I would really appreciate the steps I can undertake to revert this decision as a lot of time and effort has gone thus far into creating this article. Wandaraskin ( talk) 27 January 2017 (UTC)
I have added categories and some references to Delta English School's article (similar to what other Sharjah schools have done on their Wikipedia articles). I have read and is completely familiar with Wikipedia article posting guidelines. We do not intend to market Delta English School through its Wikipedia article but rather inform the UAE community who desire to learn more about the school. Content will be closely screened for biased/promotional information and edited to reflect a neutral opinion. More references will be added to support Wikipedia:Notability. Wandaraskin ( talk) 01:54, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
The article on Delta English School, as stated before, is STRICTLY NOT intended to be promotional in nature. Content is written with neutrality and explains Delta English School in its entirety. I do not see the 'promotional and prospectus' angles which are lucidly floated by some Wikipedia editors - all processes and services described in this article ARE TRUE AND CURRENTLY EXIST ON-CAMPUS. If a process/service exist and is written neutrally, it completely aligns with Wikipedia's writing tone and style. Why should this article be penalized (or deleted) for accurately listing all processes and services which the institution faithfully renders to help improve the life of students in the United Arab Emirates? There are countless Wikipedia articles on UAE-based K-12 institutions with most of them lacking credible sources and containing clear advertisement-style content. Since those institution articles are not under consideration for deletion, why is Wikipedia treating this article harshly and differently? The article is open to editing by the community and describes information that is requested by the general UAE population. To comply with Wikipedia guidelines, we will NEVER attempt to reference paid press releases to enforce article notability (as was previously misunderstood by Robert McClenon), but the article will require some time to have independent references created and published for citation. The article undergoes constant editing for clarity and non-bias and hence should be retained. Wandaraskin ( talk) 01:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. All the article confirms is it exists. Ibis are 3 star hotels and generally only 5 star hotels with significant coverage are kept LibStar ( talk) 07:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for actors or general notability guideline. Only one minor role in a notable unreleased TV show; all coverage of this actress appears trivial at best. Appable ( talk | contributions) 06:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. As pointed out, it would require a complete rewrite to not be promotional, so G11 applies SmartSE ( talk) 13:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Highly promotional article with major contributions from now blocked paid editing ring. I'm not sure whether or not there is any underlying notability, so I made a try at revising the article. I found it impossible, because almost all the references are mere mentions, unacceptable unreliable sources, or both. This would need to be started over from scratch, and when an article is in that state, es we delete, especially when paid editing is involved. DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW Bad faith nomination by confirmed sock of site-banned user. Favonian ( talk) 18:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Lack of notability and Very small 2 lines article Vushakiran ( talk) 05:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Not notable except for one YouTube interview. Other than that, this is a promotional article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
questionable notability, originally proposed for deletion, but I thought salt mines in general might be notable Prisencolin ( talk) 02:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Wrong venue; now at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:1G (TV series). ( non-admin closure) ansh 666 04:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
This article have been created long time ago and has not been broadcasted yet. Kazaro ( talk) 02:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Small local food company -- so small, it needed to run a $65,000 crowd-funding campaign. The strongest source here is the Daily Mail. Calton | Talk 02:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Minute to Win It (Philippine game show). Black Kite (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
The information was originally included in the Minute to Win It (Philippine game show) article. However, I decided to trim down the article due to the reasons of:
The result was redirect to The Dead Rabbitts. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Appears to lack substantial coverage in reliable sources. I did find this [2] Siuenti ( talk) 17:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Completely fails WP:GNG. Only source is the official website (which looks very poor) and there very little coverage in independent sources. The previous nomination closed as no consensus. According to the talk page, the organisation apparently dissolved in 2009. Laurdecl talk 01:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
No coverage to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Sources are affiliated, database-driven references, or bare credits. Largoplazo ( talk) 01:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced hagiography fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO Mduvekot (talk) 01:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
I support wiki hierarchy and gathering information mechanism. If someone educate me, how do I need to refer the article which was publish through local news paper published in Urdu language way back in 2006 and during that time period they were not online. Wikiunbiased ( talk) 03:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NMUSIC. Has been tagged since 2009. Although a member of the Chicago Symphony, there is little independent coverage. MB 04:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. There may be a rationale for a redirect to Startup Village here; if so, that is an editorial decision. Black Kite (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not notable. Most of the article talks about an organization this person was supposedly associated with for some time in the past. Most links are are also about the organization, which may or may not be notable. There is nothing about this person which makes him notable, except this association with this organization. Aurorion ( talk) 06:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Agreed that the Wikipedia page of Sijo Kuruvilla George doesn't do justice to his work especially in the entrepreneurship space in the state of Kerala. He is one of the pioneers who kick started and later spearheaded an entrepreneurship movement in the very conservative state where technology startups were a foreign term. The organisation in reference is Startup Village which is also India's First Public-Private-Partnership Technology Business Incubator, which is now moving to the 2nd phase of their operations as SV.CO.
It is understandable that most of his recent work has not been covered as he has moved to working with educators and government bodies. He recently worked with Kerala Startup Mission to design the KSUM Fellowship Programme and now is working with KITCO to design the school education programs. He was also invited to write a column for Mathrubhumi.
Aby James ( talk) 03:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC +05:30)
Notes:
1. One of his
interview in
Manorama News
2. One of his
interview in
Media One.
3. His Mathrubhumi Column:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
4. Search of Startup Village on
Google
5. Startup Village on
Economic Times
6. Search of Startup Village on
YouTube
7. Search of Sijo Kuruvilla George on
YouTube
8. Coverage of Sijo Kuruvilla George on
The Hindu:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
I have edited the page to reflect Startup Village's importance, and Sijo's contributions outside Startup Village especially the role as a entrepreneurship columnist as mentioned by Aby James.
Aurorion please review the changes and if satisfactory, please remove the delete request.
DhananSekhar ( talk) 04:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
1. Founding CEO of India's first Public Private Partnership model business incubator.
2. Establishment of India's first Student Entrepreneurship Policy.
3. Sijo Kuruvilla George's and Startup Village's impact on entrepreneurship in the State of Kerala.
Aby James 3 February 2017 (+05:30 UTC) —Preceding undated comment added 16:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
I struck out a few !votes that looked WP:DUCKy. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 04:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The sockpuppet investigation raised by KATMAKROFAN has been closed. Requesting to revoke the striking out of our votes. Aby James ( talk) 16:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
It seems my contributions to improve the page is perceived as sockpuppeting, canvassing, and meatpuppetry. All new terms which took good reading to understand the concepts and will take more processes and time to clear.
As one of the people who closely observes the Indian startup ecosystem, I believe Sijo Kuruvilla George's contributions in setting up and founding Startup Village and the subsequent impact it had on the Kerala Startup Ecosystem deserves a Wikipedia page.
The intention is not quantity over quality either. When references and citations were required, those were provided. And all the links provided are to credible sources as outlined in Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The dead links can be retrieved from the Internet Archive. For example, for the 2nd reference retrieved from the Internet Archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20131029204533/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/131009/lifestyle-offbeat/article/cool-calm-and-oh-so-young. But I feel any attempts to make any more edits will end up being misconstrued. Aby James ( talk) 17:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
References
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Procedural nomination—on reflection, I've reversed my own speedy deletion of this page since although it looks like unsourced and poorly written spam to me, in light of the number of other editors who've edited this page and apparently not seen anything wrong with it there may be something I'm missing. Procedural nomination, so I abstain. ‑ Iridescent 18:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep WP:GN. A few of the sources are unreliable and need to be removed. But even when gone, it meets GN-- NadirAli نادر علی ( talk) 13:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
this is simply a mirror of the web page referenced. As per WP:NOTMIRROR this page does not have its place on wikipedia. Domdeparis ( talk) 14:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
So every district and many larger talukas in India have a district court and various other courts functioning under it. I see no reason why the legal infrastructure system of every district should have a separate article. the editor clearly has WP:COI here as he seems to have uploaded various pictures too of the court employees. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 05:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
District Legal Services Authority exists in multiple districts and larger talukas in India. This particular branch seems to be no specifically different or outstanding in any encyclopedic manner. The editor seems t have WP:COI as they have uploaded images of employee too. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 05:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Puffery-heavy but source-light -- "light", as in "essentially non-existent" -- biography of an inspirational speaker. Lots of name-dropping, little sign of actual notability. Calton | Talk 08:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Article about non-notable photographer and Professor. Doesn't pass WP:CREATIVE or WP:ACADEMIC. Google and NYT searches provides nothing to establish notability in these areas. CBS527 Talk 21:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC) CBS527 Talk 21:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Patience (George Michael album). Kurykh ( talk) 01:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Notability is not inherited, nor has it been established in the content of the article. It is not a single. It did not chart. It has not won any awards. It is simply a song on an album. Kellymoat ( talk) 14:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Promotional biography for a non-notable producer and businessman. Re-created twice by blocked, possibly paid, editors. The article is entirely based on trivial company listings and a few short promo interviews for a movie, with almost no independent coverage about the producer himself, let alone in-depth coverage. His other business activities have no independent sources at all. A Google search in English showed no other usable sources. The last AfD-debate has been NAC-closed as "no consensus", although it had 2 delete statements (incl. nom) from experienced Wikipedia editors. GermanJoe ( talk) 10:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable minor actor lacking significant support. reddogsix ( talk) 00:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG per WP:ROUTINE sources. Does not meet any of the requirements of WP:NHOCKEY. Yosemiter ( talk) 19:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
As for the list of leagues you mention, the unlisted ones are not even the top level in their region or type (the KHL is in Asia as well) and simply have not demonstrated any signs of automatic notability. If a player does get significant coverage there, it is likely because they were a star player for the league and generated the coverage necessary to meet GNG on its own. Yosemiter ( talk) 19:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
That being said, many people unfamiliar with ice hockey over the years have both been confused by the verbiage of NHOCKEY (understandable) and surprisingly resistant to take the word of veteran editors as to what the clauses mean (less so). The language has been tweaked many times to attempt to address the oft-conflicting problems presented both by editors unfamiliar with hockey and those hellbent on exploiting any loophole, real or imagined, to protect their pet articles. At this remove, short of rewriting it to be several times as long as any other NSPORTS set of subordinate notability criteria, and with condescendingly direct language, NHOCKEY is what it is. Could you see your way clear to accepting that Yosemiter's explanation does, indeed, reflect consensus as to what the criteria means? Ravenswing 00:40, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains ( talk) 20:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=ZKODDfNVMmsC&pg=PA74&dq=%CE%91%CF%8A%CE%B4%CE%AF%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%BF%CF%82&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjM2PXgu-jRAhVpIMAKHZLjDb8Q6AEIGjAA#v=onepage&q=%CE%91%CF%8A%CE%B4%CE%AF%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%BF%CF%82&f=false Samizambak ( talk) 15:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nick Warren. Black Kite (talk) 18:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
No non-primary references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Richhoncho ( talk) 20:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment Not mentioned in artist's article, but might be worth redirecting there. I couldn't find evidence it meets WP:NSONG or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 08:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep: I don't think it hurts having this article, it's not like it harms the database or creates possible ambiguity or people hitting the article looking for something else, thus i'm against deletion -- ThG ( talk) 11:00, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete or Redirect to Artist - Wikipedia shouldn't be a song catalog unless the song is, itself, notable. Cosmic Sans ( talk) 16:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Neologism ( WP:NEO) created by SPA and de-PRODded by same, possibly creation of Crowdnetic. Brianhe ( talk) 00:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)}} Brianhe ( talk) 00:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not satisfy athletic notability. YouTube is not a reliable source. Wikipedia is not a source. Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:18, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:18, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:CRYSTAL. Not sure if would be notable even after released. Dat Guy Talk Contribs 23:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
As per WP:CRYSTAL. This tournament is likely to happen in 2018, however as none of the feeder tounaments to decide the participating teams have yet to be played, it is too early for this tournament to have an article. The venue is, as yet, undecided as well. PinchHittingLeggy ( talk) 22:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Artist of questionable notability. Article was nominated by an IP without followup, but upon inspection I found nothing to satisfy WP:ARTIST and little if anything that comes close to meet WP:GNG--cited sources appear to be run-of-the-mill local reviews. Article creator and couple of contributors appear to be single-purpose accounts. -- Finngall talk 22:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
There are no WP articles for "Ashley Stones", her supposed third album Cherryade, or the other songs she supposedly recorded. Google searches do not show ay songs or albums by a "Ashley Stones". Although the producer is listed as Burns, this song or album are not listed among his production credits. Likewise it is not among the supposed songwriter Mark Taylor's credits. Bronwyn (singer), another article created by the article author, CqlebEllis, was deleted as "has yet to release anything". Ojorojo ( talk) 19:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Looks like you must do a WP:BEFORE search first before nominating anything for deletion. ( non-admin closure) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 20:47, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Recreated without going through DRV. Delete, salt, and add to title blacklist. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 18:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 21:03, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Very scant coverage fails to meet WP:CORP. The two sources available are a profile of the CEO, who has been editing this article ( User:Koliver2), and a bog-standard "companies being honored at a local awards ceremony" piece. Note that when searching the name, there are other companies known as Amelex with no relation to this one. Raymie ( t • c) 17:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 21:06, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Completely unsourced WP:BLP of a film editor and composer, whose only discernible claim of notability is that he's worked on films that exist. As always, a person in the film industry is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he has an IMDb profile -- he has to be the subject of reliable source coverage in media for a Wikipedia article to become earned. Bearcat ( talk) 17:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:TOOSOON article about a film which is only just now entering the production pipeline ("commenced principal photography on February 6, 2017" -- and that's not a typo, because one of the references here is a casting call dated December 2016). This is referenced exclusively to primary sources, except for a single glancing namecheck of its existence in a Playback article about its casting director -- and there's a conflict of interest here, as the article was created by a person with a direct professional relationship with the film's producer. As always, Wikipedia is not an advance publicity database on which a film gets to have a primary sourced article the moment it enters the production pipeline -- except very occasionally in the case of exceptionally high profile projects like Star Wars eps 8 and 9 where the media obsessively publish every scrap of advance information they can get their hands on, most films outside of that rarefied class of megaprojects don't get articles on here until they're actually released and garnering actual critical reviews to pass WP:NFILM. No prejudice against recreation if and when that happens, but today is not the time for an article about an indie film that is only just starting photography. Bearcat ( talk) 16:57, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Pleas note that I have corrected the verb tense from "commenced" to "commences."
Unfortunately, I have to once again correct Bearcat when he/she conflates by Wiki username "Davidjosephanselmo" with the person with the same name who is the CEO of a film studio in the city of Greater Sudbury, Ontario. Once again, this is incorrect as while my Wiki username is "Davidjosephanselmo" it is not my actual name LMFAO. Similar to how "Bearcat" is not a "bearcat" (whatever that may be) and his/her actual name is probably not "Bearcat." My username is an inside joke, and not my actual identity so there is NO conflict of interest. Furthermore, the feature Grim Trigger is NOT being produced in any way whatsoever with David Joseph Anselmo and/or his studio. Finally, I included in my sources an Ontario government link regarding its financial participation in Grim Trigger. Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 17:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Please note Bearcat that, once again, the feature Grim Trigger is NOT being produced in any way whatsoever with David Joseph Anselmo and/or his studio. Think of it this way: I have no relation to the now deceased Steve Jobs. Even if I create the Wiki username "Stevejobs" I still have no relation to Steve Jobs OTHER than the fact that I have used his hame as my Wiki username. And I might do this as an inside joke between myself and someone(s) else who is not or related to Steve Jobs. Make sense? Once again, my Wiki username "Davidjosephanselmo" is an inside joke, but it is not an inside joke between myself and David Joseph Anselmo. I can't make this ANYMORE clear. Hopefully you can now stop kicking this dead horse :) The film was mentioned as going into production in Playback magazine, which is Canada's version of the US's Variety. How does this "not assist notability"? Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 17:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Bearcat There is no relation between the feature Grim Trigger and the CEO of the film studio located in the same city that Grim Trigger is being produced. I just checked to see if this CEO was on IMDB, and he is under the name "David Anselmo" http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2156926/ . My Wiki username, "Davidjosephanselmo," which, again, I chose years ago, is not my actual name, nor am I trying to "impersonate" this CEO, who is not a celebrity or known in any significant way. I note that he does not have a Wiki page. I have never written anything on Wiki regarding this individual and/or his studio and/or his film & TV productions. Again, difficult to argue that I am impersonating someone with a project -- Grim Trigger -- that is in no way related to him. You claim to have made some "connection" with Grim Trigger because my Wiki username "Davidjosephanselmo" is very similar to this CEO "David Anselmo." Other than this connection, there is NO connection, and this CEO has no relation to Grim Trigger. I am not trying to make a connection between this CEO and Grim Trigger, you are. I am underlying that there is NO connection. Bearcat Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 18:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Once again, Bearcat, you are incorrect in that every article that I've ever created on Wiki "has been about either a person who works in Sudbury's film industry or a film made in Sudbury." If you consider "David Anselmo" (as he is listed on IMDB) to be the "alpha dog of Sudbury's film industry" then that is your prerogative. From what I know, he is best known as the Hallmark TV Movie-of-the Week producer, and his "studio" is actually an unconverted and dilapidated community skating arena. Regardless, you'll notice that non of those individuals that you have listed -- Zahra Golafshani, Ernest Riffe, Andrew David and Mathieu Séguin -- have anything to do with this same "David Anselmo," who, AGAIN, has nothing to do with Grim Trigger. You are proving my point that, once again, I am not this CEO, and this individual has, once again, nothing to do with Grim Trigger. Only in your mind Bearcat is there a connection between this CEO and Grim Trigger. Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 19:00, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Despite claims to the contrary by the OP, he has a COI in this article, and not hiding it well. Also under fits under WP:TOOSOON. JerrySa1 ( talk) 20:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable newly instantiated business award. Can't see how it's notable. scope_creep ( talk) 16:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a film producer, whose only discernible claim of notability is that he's worked on films that exist. The referencing here is a mix of primary sources and local media coverage in the city where he works, with no evidence shown that he's garnered any reliable source coverage beyond the purely local; there's also a conflict of interest here, as the article has been edited by a professional colleague of his. As always, film producers do not automatically get Wikipedia articles just because they have profiles on IMDb -- they must be sourceable as having achieved something that actually passes WP:CREATIVE. Bearcat ( talk) 16:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk, contribs) 00:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Neither a politician nor notable. Fails WP:BIO. Three references, ones a dud, other one points to a knowledge website where he has created an article, which doesn't affirm his claim that he is an author. Other ref is WSJ reporting he made CEO of christies. Not notable. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep ( talk) 16:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:20, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
PROD removed by author without explanation. A Google search result indicate a non-notable theme park. Fails GNG. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:23, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kurykh ( talk) 01:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. No indication of notability. scope_creep ( talk) 16:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a film editor, whose only discernible claim of notability is that he's worked on films that exist. This is sourced almost entirely to references that verify the existence of the films, while failing to contain any mention of Riffe at all -- and the only reference that does have his name in it is a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE. Further, there's a conflict of interest here, as the article was created by the CEO of the main film studio in the same city where Riffe works. As always, a person in the film industry is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he has an IMDb profile -- he has to be the subject of coverage in reliable sources, not just nominally verifiable as existing, to get an article on here. Bearcat ( talk) 16:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
"Even if you're telling the truth that you're not personally David Joseph Anselmo, it doesn't make that much difference. Any form of direct personal association with the article topics is a conflict of interest on here — so if you're in any sort of position in which using his name as your username can qualify as an "inside joke", then you still have a COI."
Bearcat, please note that I have zero direct personal association with the article topics so, once again, there is NO conflict of interest here. And I repeat, David Joseph Anselmo has absolutely nothing to do with this feature film. You, Bearcat, are the person who keeps making this claim that cannot be verified. Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 17:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Think of it this way: I have no relation to the now deceased Steve Jobs. Even if I create the Wiki username "Stevejobs" I still have no relation to Steve Jobs OTHER than the fact that I have used his hame as my Wiki username. And I might do this as an inside joke between myself and someone(s) else who is not or related to Steve Jobs. Make sense? Once again, my Wiki username "Davidjosephanselmo" is an inside joke, but it is not an inside joke between myself and David Joseph Anselmo. I can't make this ANYMORE clear. Hopefully you can now stop kicking this dead horse :) Davidjosephanselmo ( talk) 17:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable WP:BLP of a self-published author and film director, can find no references about him aside from his own websites which have been listed as sources ABF99 ( talk) 15:56, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete. WP:BLP of a director who has only made short films to date. Her only claim of notability is having won awards from the "local filmmakers" programming stream of the film festival in the city where she works, and her only sourceability is to the local media -- and there's a conflict of interest here, as the article was created by the CEO of the same city's primary film studio. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she accomplishes something more than locally notable and becomes more than locally sourceable, but Cinéfest is not a major enough film festival for its best short film award to carry a person over WP:CREATIVE all by itself. Bearcat ( talk) 15:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Described himself as Veteran corporate and political strategist. Major puff piece article that magically appeared fully formed, created by editor with SPA account User talk:Ejdooley. Not a politician. Fails WP:GNG. scope_creep ( talk) 15:11, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
non notable logistics company, Fails NCORP & GNG – Davey2010 Talk 14:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Promotional article about a non-notable corporation. MER-C 13:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Drummed up bio about an author of some self-published books. No indication of any notability, does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 12:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Unfererenced article about non-notable software. MER-C 12:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD (with no explanation) - Article is an essay (see WP:NOTESSAY) and contains referenced statements, mixed with WP:SYNTH based on the article creator's personal opinion. It appears that this article was created as part of a project (see Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_North_Carolina_Wilmington/History_and_Methods_of_Infectious_Diseases_Research_(Spring_2017)) and when it first appeared in Article space I moved it back to the editor's sandbox, feeling that it was not ready to be a Wikipedia entry. The creator moved it back to article space over the redirect, which is why it appears that I have created this article - I'm definitely not the author. Exemplo347 ( talk) 12:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to be a notable app; a search for coverage in reliable sources resulted mainly in false positives, passing mentions, or unreliable sites such as blogs and web forums. I couldn't find any significant reliable coverage about the app itself. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) Adam9007 ( talk) 17:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Non notable band that fails WP:BAND. No mention on Discogs, Spotify, Napster. Only 18 members on sound cloud. Previously nominated for WP:AFD nomination several days ago, but no one noticed it with no votes. Completely non notable. scope_creep ( talk) 11:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a young Australian artist who is a self taught musician. She has overcome addiction and psychosis. She is growing an audience particularly through YouTube - videos range from a small audience of 3800 on up to over 1 million. She is starting to tour. So yes, she is new and the impact is small but it is growing. Removal seems inappropriate 184.70.125.198 ( talk) 16:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC) Also worth checking her website tashsultana.com which shows the sort of detail that merits keeping this entry.
The result was Speedily deleted by RHaworth (A10 of BansheePHP). ( non-admin closure) Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 12:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. No reliable independent references. Fails WP:GNG. One of very many content management systems, few of which have achieved notability Velella Velella Talk 10:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Antipolo. Black Kite (talk) 18:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
K-6 school, no meaningful external reliable source coverage (currently-cited sources are simply lists of schools.) NorthBySouthBaranof ( talk) 08:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
*Delete non notable encyclopedia material.I have an alternate account, User:BethOne .(
Cfgvhbj (
talk) 01:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)) false vote by an impersonating editor struck out
Velella
Velella Talk
01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
This researcher does not appear to fulfill the notability requirements for academics, with an h index of 12, a cite max of 101 and that (by some distance) highest-cited article co-authored as an undergrad, and no indications of recognized great influence in the field. - Much as I dislike judging academics by these metrics (my h-index makes me as notable as a dead fish) and despite my personal interest in this research topic, this is what the criteria on WP go by. Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 08:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Here is my opinion on this https://sociobiology.wordpress.com/2017/02/04/is-wikipedia-anti-intellectual-compare-athletes-to-academics-and-the-answer-is-yes/ Agelaia ( talk) 20:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:26, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Not the subject of significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) No in-depth hits in a video game reliable sources custom, books, or regular Google searches, and no suitable redirect targets (isn't known as an employee or designer of a single company/game). czar 07:52, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
This article is original research. There are no independent secondary sources that I have found to assert that this is a notable topic. TheMagikCow ( talk) 16:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
W Nowicki, this kind of details for other software is presented as well in Wikipedia (you can check on this /info/en/?search=Category:Software_version_histories any software, for example, Yahoo! Messenger version history ). What's the difference between Vivaldi version history page and Yahoo! messenger version history page? Shpankov ( talk) 18:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
OK, the page was merged with the main article. This article can be deleted. Shpankov ( talk) 08:04, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Kurykh ( talk) 01:27, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Small -- hell, tiny -- Toronto retailer. It's claims to fame are as "the first brand in Canada to partner with a medical-marijuana producer to offer legally branded Cannabis" and "the first Canadian cannabis consumer brand to raise capital" -- neither of which milestones has attracted any real attention. Calton | Talk 18:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Secondary schools are generally assumed notable; however, we have to consider other issues - as pointed out by the Delete voters, this article is almost completely promotional, and only sourced to the school's own sources and so there is no verifiability. TNT applies - there is an article to be written here, just not this one. Black Kite (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of third-party notability. Google search finds the usual vanity coverage, but no third-party coverage. Note that author stated, in removing the PROD, that they were initiating an extensive PR effort to find sources. Wikipedia isn't driven by PR. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
I, Wanda Raskin, am the MarCom Administrator for Delta English School. I have only made edits to Delta English School's article on Wikipedia because I am employed by this institution. Based upon request by Delta English School's parent community, I decided to create a Wikipedia article for the institution as none exist at the moment. I noticed that the article has been orphaned and tagged for deletion. I would really appreciate the steps I can undertake to revert this decision as a lot of time and effort has gone thus far into creating this article. Wandaraskin ( talk) 27 January 2017 (UTC)
I have added categories and some references to Delta English School's article (similar to what other Sharjah schools have done on their Wikipedia articles). I have read and is completely familiar with Wikipedia article posting guidelines. We do not intend to market Delta English School through its Wikipedia article but rather inform the UAE community who desire to learn more about the school. Content will be closely screened for biased/promotional information and edited to reflect a neutral opinion. More references will be added to support Wikipedia:Notability. Wandaraskin ( talk) 01:54, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
The article on Delta English School, as stated before, is STRICTLY NOT intended to be promotional in nature. Content is written with neutrality and explains Delta English School in its entirety. I do not see the 'promotional and prospectus' angles which are lucidly floated by some Wikipedia editors - all processes and services described in this article ARE TRUE AND CURRENTLY EXIST ON-CAMPUS. If a process/service exist and is written neutrally, it completely aligns with Wikipedia's writing tone and style. Why should this article be penalized (or deleted) for accurately listing all processes and services which the institution faithfully renders to help improve the life of students in the United Arab Emirates? There are countless Wikipedia articles on UAE-based K-12 institutions with most of them lacking credible sources and containing clear advertisement-style content. Since those institution articles are not under consideration for deletion, why is Wikipedia treating this article harshly and differently? The article is open to editing by the community and describes information that is requested by the general UAE population. To comply with Wikipedia guidelines, we will NEVER attempt to reference paid press releases to enforce article notability (as was previously misunderstood by Robert McClenon), but the article will require some time to have independent references created and published for citation. The article undergoes constant editing for clarity and non-bias and hence should be retained. Wandaraskin ( talk) 01:36, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG. All the article confirms is it exists. Ibis are 3 star hotels and generally only 5 star hotels with significant coverage are kept LibStar ( talk) 07:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for actors or general notability guideline. Only one minor role in a notable unreleased TV show; all coverage of this actress appears trivial at best. Appable ( talk | contributions) 06:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. As pointed out, it would require a complete rewrite to not be promotional, so G11 applies SmartSE ( talk) 13:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Highly promotional article with major contributions from now blocked paid editing ring. I'm not sure whether or not there is any underlying notability, so I made a try at revising the article. I found it impossible, because almost all the references are mere mentions, unacceptable unreliable sources, or both. This would need to be started over from scratch, and when an article is in that state, es we delete, especially when paid editing is involved. DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. WP:SNOW Bad faith nomination by confirmed sock of site-banned user. Favonian ( talk) 18:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Lack of notability and Very small 2 lines article Vushakiran ( talk) 05:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Not notable except for one YouTube interview. Other than that, this is a promotional article. Robert McClenon ( talk) 03:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
questionable notability, originally proposed for deletion, but I thought salt mines in general might be notable Prisencolin ( talk) 02:13, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Wrong venue; now at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:1G (TV series). ( non-admin closure) ansh 666 04:19, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
This article have been created long time ago and has not been broadcasted yet. Kazaro ( talk) 02:35, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:30, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Small local food company -- so small, it needed to run a $65,000 crowd-funding campaign. The strongest source here is the Daily Mail. Calton | Talk 02:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Minute to Win It (Philippine game show). Black Kite (talk) 18:07, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
The information was originally included in the Minute to Win It (Philippine game show) article. However, I decided to trim down the article due to the reasons of:
The result was redirect to The Dead Rabbitts. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Appears to lack substantial coverage in reliable sources. I did find this [2] Siuenti ( talk) 17:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 01:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Completely fails WP:GNG. Only source is the official website (which looks very poor) and there very little coverage in independent sources. The previous nomination closed as no consensus. According to the talk page, the organisation apparently dissolved in 2009. Laurdecl talk 01:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
No coverage to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Sources are affiliated, database-driven references, or bare credits. Largoplazo ( talk) 01:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced hagiography fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO Mduvekot (talk) 01:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
I support wiki hierarchy and gathering information mechanism. If someone educate me, how do I need to refer the article which was publish through local news paper published in Urdu language way back in 2006 and during that time period they were not online. Wikiunbiased ( talk) 03:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Black Kite (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:NMUSIC. Has been tagged since 2009. Although a member of the Chicago Symphony, there is little independent coverage. MB 04:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. There may be a rationale for a redirect to Startup Village here; if so, that is an editorial decision. Black Kite (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not notable. Most of the article talks about an organization this person was supposedly associated with for some time in the past. Most links are are also about the organization, which may or may not be notable. There is nothing about this person which makes him notable, except this association with this organization. Aurorion ( talk) 06:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Agreed that the Wikipedia page of Sijo Kuruvilla George doesn't do justice to his work especially in the entrepreneurship space in the state of Kerala. He is one of the pioneers who kick started and later spearheaded an entrepreneurship movement in the very conservative state where technology startups were a foreign term. The organisation in reference is Startup Village which is also India's First Public-Private-Partnership Technology Business Incubator, which is now moving to the 2nd phase of their operations as SV.CO.
It is understandable that most of his recent work has not been covered as he has moved to working with educators and government bodies. He recently worked with Kerala Startup Mission to design the KSUM Fellowship Programme and now is working with KITCO to design the school education programs. He was also invited to write a column for Mathrubhumi.
Aby James ( talk) 03:45, 26 January 2017 (UTC +05:30)
Notes:
1. One of his
interview in
Manorama News
2. One of his
interview in
Media One.
3. His Mathrubhumi Column:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
4. Search of Startup Village on
Google
5. Startup Village on
Economic Times
6. Search of Startup Village on
YouTube
7. Search of Sijo Kuruvilla George on
YouTube
8. Coverage of Sijo Kuruvilla George on
The Hindu:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
I have edited the page to reflect Startup Village's importance, and Sijo's contributions outside Startup Village especially the role as a entrepreneurship columnist as mentioned by Aby James.
Aurorion please review the changes and if satisfactory, please remove the delete request.
DhananSekhar ( talk) 04:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
1. Founding CEO of India's first Public Private Partnership model business incubator.
2. Establishment of India's first Student Entrepreneurship Policy.
3. Sijo Kuruvilla George's and Startup Village's impact on entrepreneurship in the State of Kerala.
Aby James 3 February 2017 (+05:30 UTC) —Preceding undated comment added 16:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
I struck out a few !votes that looked WP:DUCKy. KATMAKROFAN ( talk) 04:04, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The sockpuppet investigation raised by KATMAKROFAN has been closed. Requesting to revoke the striking out of our votes. Aby James ( talk) 16:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
It seems my contributions to improve the page is perceived as sockpuppeting, canvassing, and meatpuppetry. All new terms which took good reading to understand the concepts and will take more processes and time to clear.
As one of the people who closely observes the Indian startup ecosystem, I believe Sijo Kuruvilla George's contributions in setting up and founding Startup Village and the subsequent impact it had on the Kerala Startup Ecosystem deserves a Wikipedia page.
The intention is not quantity over quality either. When references and citations were required, those were provided. And all the links provided are to credible sources as outlined in Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The dead links can be retrieved from the Internet Archive. For example, for the 2nd reference retrieved from the Internet Archive: http://web.archive.org/web/20131029204533/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/131009/lifestyle-offbeat/article/cool-calm-and-oh-so-young. But I feel any attempts to make any more edits will end up being misconstrued. Aby James ( talk) 17:55, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
References
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:24, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Procedural nomination—on reflection, I've reversed my own speedy deletion of this page since although it looks like unsourced and poorly written spam to me, in light of the number of other editors who've edited this page and apparently not seen anything wrong with it there may be something I'm missing. Procedural nomination, so I abstain. ‑ Iridescent 18:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep WP:GN. A few of the sources are unreliable and need to be removed. But even when gone, it meets GN-- NadirAli نادر علی ( talk) 13:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 18:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
this is simply a mirror of the web page referenced. As per WP:NOTMIRROR this page does not have its place on wikipedia. Domdeparis ( talk) 14:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
So every district and many larger talukas in India have a district court and various other courts functioning under it. I see no reason why the legal infrastructure system of every district should have a separate article. the editor clearly has WP:COI here as he seems to have uploaded various pictures too of the court employees. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 05:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
District Legal Services Authority exists in multiple districts and larger talukas in India. This particular branch seems to be no specifically different or outstanding in any encyclopedic manner. The editor seems t have WP:COI as they have uploaded images of employee too. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 05:09, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Puffery-heavy but source-light -- "light", as in "essentially non-existent" -- biography of an inspirational speaker. Lots of name-dropping, little sign of actual notability. Calton | Talk 08:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Article about non-notable photographer and Professor. Doesn't pass WP:CREATIVE or WP:ACADEMIC. Google and NYT searches provides nothing to establish notability in these areas. CBS527 Talk 21:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC) CBS527 Talk 21:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Patience (George Michael album). Kurykh ( talk) 01:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Notability is not inherited, nor has it been established in the content of the article. It is not a single. It did not chart. It has not won any awards. It is simply a song on an album. Kellymoat ( talk) 14:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Promotional biography for a non-notable producer and businessman. Re-created twice by blocked, possibly paid, editors. The article is entirely based on trivial company listings and a few short promo interviews for a movie, with almost no independent coverage about the producer himself, let alone in-depth coverage. His other business activities have no independent sources at all. A Google search in English showed no other usable sources. The last AfD-debate has been NAC-closed as "no consensus", although it had 2 delete statements (incl. nom) from experienced Wikipedia editors. GermanJoe ( talk) 10:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable minor actor lacking significant support. reddogsix ( talk) 00:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG per WP:ROUTINE sources. Does not meet any of the requirements of WP:NHOCKEY. Yosemiter ( talk) 19:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
As for the list of leagues you mention, the unlisted ones are not even the top level in their region or type (the KHL is in Asia as well) and simply have not demonstrated any signs of automatic notability. If a player does get significant coverage there, it is likely because they were a star player for the league and generated the coverage necessary to meet GNG on its own. Yosemiter ( talk) 19:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
That being said, many people unfamiliar with ice hockey over the years have both been confused by the verbiage of NHOCKEY (understandable) and surprisingly resistant to take the word of veteran editors as to what the clauses mean (less so). The language has been tweaked many times to attempt to address the oft-conflicting problems presented both by editors unfamiliar with hockey and those hellbent on exploiting any loophole, real or imagined, to protect their pet articles. At this remove, short of rewriting it to be several times as long as any other NSPORTS set of subordinate notability criteria, and with condescendingly direct language, NHOCKEY is what it is. Could you see your way clear to accepting that Yosemiter's explanation does, indeed, reflect consensus as to what the criteria means? Ravenswing 00:40, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains ( talk) 20:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=ZKODDfNVMmsC&pg=PA74&dq=%CE%91%CF%8A%CE%B4%CE%AF%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%BF%CF%82&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjM2PXgu-jRAhVpIMAKHZLjDb8Q6AEIGjAA#v=onepage&q=%CE%91%CF%8A%CE%B4%CE%AF%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%BF%CF%82&f=false Samizambak ( talk) 15:15, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Nick Warren. Black Kite (talk) 18:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
No non-primary references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Richhoncho ( talk) 20:22, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment Not mentioned in artist's article, but might be worth redirecting there. I couldn't find evidence it meets WP:NSONG or WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 08:46, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Keep: I don't think it hurts having this article, it's not like it harms the database or creates possible ambiguity or people hitting the article looking for something else, thus i'm against deletion -- ThG ( talk) 11:00, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Delete or Redirect to Artist - Wikipedia shouldn't be a song catalog unless the song is, itself, notable. Cosmic Sans ( talk) 16:24, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Kurykh ( talk) 01:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Neologism ( WP:NEO) created by SPA and de-PRODded by same, possibly creation of Crowdnetic. Brianhe ( talk) 00:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)}} Brianhe ( talk) 00:06, 4 February 2017 (UTC)