NadirAli is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
|||||||
User:Nadirali/articles and other pages I created since I re-joined Wiki
User:NadirAli/Articles I significantly improved
[14] weapons and technology guide. [15] [16]
[18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]
User:NadirAli/Scientific and parascientific perspectives on The Force
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
In appreciation of all your high quality work on Pakistan-related articles on Wikipedia that I have come across since 2012. I realize you are an experienced editor and have been active for many years. I have nothing but respect for all your work. Thanks and Best Regards Ngrewal1 ( talk) 22:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC) |
Once voting starts, you can't withdraw, and it started several hours before your withdrawal.
Doug Weller talk 10:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
The India-Pakistan arbitration amendment request filed on 23 May 2018 (the appeal of certain arbitration enforcement actions by GoldenRing) has been closed as unsuccessful. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Consider checking Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#NadirAli. My Lord ( talk) 05:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Nadir. Hope all is well. I'm having a little issue at the Wagah article. I thought it would be a straightforward change in name request, but it appears one person is resisting because apparently the New York Times and BBC news articles have more credibility than the official Government of Punjab's document over the spelling of Wahga. What's your take on this? How should I proceed since I'm new to Wiki. -- HudairaViki ( talk) 14:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TED (conference), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Carroll ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
This is a violation of your topic-ban. I'm not reporting you only because it seems as though you were reverting this edit which added material while reverting your previous edit: but it would be a good idea for you to avoid that page altogether, and another admin could still could still block you. Vanamonde ( talk) 10:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 14:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: NadirAli unblock conditions and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
But currently the more serious concern is these people are closely co-ordinating to jointly harass me, but turn by turn. It first started MBlazeLighting filing an SPI case against me in November and then turning up on CFDs on topics unrelated to his editing. He then proceeded to track my edits to undo them, as he is currently doing right now while I'm blocked on topic unrelated to him. Between these times, My Lord showed up and filed all these strange complaints against me including these SPIs and followed me. But the current concern is MBlazelightening is undoing my edits, taking advantage of the block.-- NadirAli نادر علی ( talk) 04:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
A clarification request in which you were involved has been archived at WT:Arbitration/Requests#Clarification request: NadirAli unblock conditions (August 2018). For the Arbitration Committee, Mini apolis 17:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
GenuineArt ( talk · contribs) sent a bizarre email asking about my perspective on you [on NadirAli, for all your NadirAli-talk-page-watching friends and neighbors]. Just thought you should know. I posted a note to GenuineArt's talk page here. -- EEMIV ( talk) 01:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- EEMIV ( talk) 02:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Indo-Iranic languages.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Rye-96 ( talk) 11:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
I have just closed the discussion at ANI with the conclusion that there is sufficient consensus for a full site ban on your account. [40]
There was no significant discussion of possible unban conditions, but I would suggest that the standard offer is probably your only possible path to being unbanned, and you would probably need to go at least a full year without socking or appealing as opposed to the usual six months, given your lengthy block history. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:29, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
To editor NadirAli: I have no involvement in this, but you seem to be under a misapprehension about how consensus is established on Wikipedia. It is not a vote count but an evaluation of the strength of the various arguments. As a very experienced Admin, I fully trust Beeblebrox to evaluate the arguments and determine the resultant consensus. As others have said, best you walk away from Wikipedia for a year or so before attempting to get unbanned. - Nick Thorne talk 07:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Droid (robot). Since you had some involvement with the Droid (robot) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 22:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Season's Greetings | ||
May your Holidays and the Year that follows shine as much as this coin still does beneath the tarnish of bygone weather and long use. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 22:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hello Nadir Ali, I hope all is well. All the best, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 11:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Seeds of Yesterday (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable television film, does not meet WP:NF
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
BOVINEBOY
2008 00:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Frontier Corps logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Violence in science fiction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Whole article is poorly sourced OR, can't see any indication that violence in SF as a genre is any more or less of a notable issue than in any other genre.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 04:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Darkover (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Canceled TV series. Got a brief burst of "coming soon" coverage but nothing since
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 19:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darkover (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The article Comic Con PK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable event , fails to meet the criteria of WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
M.Ashraf333 (
talk) 02:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Karachi Comic Con has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable event fails to meet the criteria of WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
M.Ashraf333 (
talk) 02:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The X-Files sources and analogues until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
NadirAli is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
|||||||
User:Nadirali/articles and other pages I created since I re-joined Wiki
User:NadirAli/Articles I significantly improved
[14] weapons and technology guide. [15] [16]
[18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]
User:NadirAli/Scientific and parascientific perspectives on The Force
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
In appreciation of all your high quality work on Pakistan-related articles on Wikipedia that I have come across since 2012. I realize you are an experienced editor and have been active for many years. I have nothing but respect for all your work. Thanks and Best Regards Ngrewal1 ( talk) 22:25, 29 May 2018 (UTC) |
Once voting starts, you can't withdraw, and it started several hours before your withdrawal.
Doug Weller talk 10:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
The India-Pakistan arbitration amendment request filed on 23 May 2018 (the appeal of certain arbitration enforcement actions by GoldenRing) has been closed as unsuccessful. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 02:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Consider checking Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#NadirAli. My Lord ( talk) 05:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello Nadir. Hope all is well. I'm having a little issue at the Wagah article. I thought it would be a straightforward change in name request, but it appears one person is resisting because apparently the New York Times and BBC news articles have more credibility than the official Government of Punjab's document over the spelling of Wahga. What's your take on this? How should I proceed since I'm new to Wiki. -- HudairaViki ( talk) 14:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TED (conference), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Carroll ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
This is a violation of your topic-ban. I'm not reporting you only because it seems as though you were reverting this edit which added material while reverting your previous edit: but it would be a good idea for you to avoid that page altogether, and another admin could still could still block you. Vanamonde ( talk) 10:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 14:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: NadirAli unblock conditions and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.
Thanks, Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 16:01, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
But currently the more serious concern is these people are closely co-ordinating to jointly harass me, but turn by turn. It first started MBlazeLighting filing an SPI case against me in November and then turning up on CFDs on topics unrelated to his editing. He then proceeded to track my edits to undo them, as he is currently doing right now while I'm blocked on topic unrelated to him. Between these times, My Lord showed up and filed all these strange complaints against me including these SPIs and followed me. But the current concern is MBlazelightening is undoing my edits, taking advantage of the block.-- NadirAli نادر علی ( talk) 04:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
A clarification request in which you were involved has been archived at WT:Arbitration/Requests#Clarification request: NadirAli unblock conditions (August 2018). For the Arbitration Committee, Mini apolis 17:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
GenuineArt ( talk · contribs) sent a bizarre email asking about my perspective on you [on NadirAli, for all your NadirAli-talk-page-watching friends and neighbors]. Just thought you should know. I posted a note to GenuineArt's talk page here. -- EEMIV ( talk) 01:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- EEMIV ( talk) 02:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Indo-Iranic languages.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Rye-96 ( talk) 11:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
I have just closed the discussion at ANI with the conclusion that there is sufficient consensus for a full site ban on your account. [40]
There was no significant discussion of possible unban conditions, but I would suggest that the standard offer is probably your only possible path to being unbanned, and you would probably need to go at least a full year without socking or appealing as opposed to the usual six months, given your lengthy block history. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:29, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
To editor NadirAli: I have no involvement in this, but you seem to be under a misapprehension about how consensus is established on Wikipedia. It is not a vote count but an evaluation of the strength of the various arguments. As a very experienced Admin, I fully trust Beeblebrox to evaluate the arguments and determine the resultant consensus. As others have said, best you walk away from Wikipedia for a year or so before attempting to get unbanned. - Nick Thorne talk 07:19, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Droid (robot). Since you had some involvement with the Droid (robot) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 22:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Season's Greetings | ||
May your Holidays and the Year that follows shine as much as this coin still does beneath the tarnish of bygone weather and long use. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 22:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC) |
Hello Nadir Ali, I hope all is well. All the best, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 11:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Seeds of Yesterday (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable television film, does not meet WP:NF
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
BOVINEBOY
2008 00:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Frontier Corps logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Violence in science fiction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Whole article is poorly sourced OR, can't see any indication that violence in SF as a genre is any more or less of a notable issue than in any other genre.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 04:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
The article Darkover (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Canceled TV series. Got a brief burst of "coming soon" coverage but nothing since
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 19:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darkover (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
The article Comic Con PK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable event , fails to meet the criteria of WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
M.Ashraf333 (
talk) 02:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Karachi Comic Con has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable event fails to meet the criteria of WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:GNG
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
M.Ashraf333 (
talk) 02:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The X-Files sources and analogues until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)