![]() |
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 22:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
No reliable sources can be found for the person. The article is not eligible for BLPPROD since it was created in 2009. (Note: Completing AfD on request by IP 121.54.54.236.) Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spinning Spark 15:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no sources provided other than a link to the company's own website. My own search just turns up trivial mentions and press releases. mikeman67 ( talk) 17:48, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Although this list is accurate and correct, it is just a synthesis of different rankings. As those rankings already have this information, this is an unnecessary article. Natg 19 ( talk) 23:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Little depth of coverage in reliable sources. A few routine bios following her appointment, but little else. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Magnolia677 ( talk) 23:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Easily speedy and PROD material with its current state and my searches simply found nothing better than this (passing mention only about founder, not even about the company), this and this. It's also worth noting it seems the company may've started this in July 2009 and it simply hasn't changed since then. Pinging taggers Dialectric and Calaka. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Since the only Keep rationales are based on the OBE, which does not confer automatic notability, and the subject has requested deletion, I think the outcom here is clear. Black Kite (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Despite receiving an OBE there is no indication Banjoko meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. Coverage consists of passing mentions only. The organization he founded may be notable; Banjoko himself does not meet WP:GNG. Sources are merely passing mentions, list entries, or Banjoko being quoted on his organization, not detailed coverage of Banjoko himself. Huon ( talk) 22:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Black Kite (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Considerably speedy and PROD material but as my searches found a few links here, here, here and here, I wanted comments to see if this can be improved. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. Her academic position is not notable; I searched Google Scholar and found nothing at all; I could find no reviews of her books, which may not be surprising since both were published in 2015. The preface to one of her books describes her as a "young" academic, maybe it's just WP:TOOSOON for her to have an article here. MelanieN ( talk) 21:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Here is one review of her book by Lesser, Emma, and Matthew W. Hughey. Review. “Getting Away with Murder: The Twentieth-Century Struggle for Civil Rights in the U.S. Senate / Vanessa A. Holloway” Ethnic and Racial Studies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavericktx ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Her books were not both published in 2015. The first one was published December 15, 2014 and the second one was May 8, 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavericktx ( talk • contribs) 13:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Will you please kindly remove the page issues link on the top left corner of her page? She is a burgeoning scholar and has a new book about civil rights forthcoming with the University of Alabama Press titled, Discrimination in Agriculture: The USDA and Black Farmers' Elusive Quest for Acreage and Land Tenure in the Post-Civil Rights Era.
Please keep her page and remove the page issues link. Many thanks to wikipedia for support! So now when people google search her or her books, there is an article entry here for her as a scholar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavericktx ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
When will her article entry be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavericktx ( talk • contribs) 10:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The subject of this article fails to meet the standards of WP:N due to lack of multiple, non-trivial references in reliable, third-party sources, nor are there likely to be any because she was only "discovered" almost four decades after her death (thus we would not expect to find coverage in newspapers of the time etc.) The fact that she was World's Oldest Person in and of itself is irrelevant for determining if she should have a stand-alone article, since there's no Wikipedia policy on the oldest anything being automatically notable by the encyclopedia's standards (also based on long-term consensus, including most recently the redirecting of this World's oldest person). Thus we default to the general notability guidelines and any material of encyclopedic merit can be included on the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia. Canadian Paul 21:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Raised at the biography noticeboard - Primary sources with no real evidence of notability. Previous AFD had one keep comment and to quote it, "Barely notable but I'm sure someone in the Comic area can improve it" - but no one did in 30 months and my Internet investigation revealed nothing that changed my mind that this person doesn't qualify for a wikipedia article. Govindaharihari ( talk) 20:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable footballer, only appearances are in Jamaican 3rd League (KSAFA Major League), which is not a fully professional league. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY Joseph2302 ( talk) 20:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Biographical SShyu01 ( talk) 20:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
*Keep - looks like a biog written by a paid acolyte or ghost writer. However the reason for deletion is farcical. Can a passing admin close this as a snow-ball keep and not waste any more time here.
Velella
Velella Talk
21:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
• Delete, the source links are broken — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SShyu01 (
talk •
contribs) 22:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC) The nominator can't vote in the discussion, the nomination itself counts as delete.
Onel5969
TT me
01:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 13:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
While the list would be interesting, it is mostly empty. There are some media articles on few select countries, but there does not seem to be a comprehensive list of state leader salaries and putting one together would be original research. Prod removed by original author without comment. Renata ( talk) 02:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Redneck rick ( talk) 14:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Contested prod. An annual convention which attracts a whopping 100 people speaks for the notability of the organization. No citations in current article. Non-notable association. Searches in News, Highbeam, and Newspapers returned zero results. Books returned some hits, but all appeared to be either trivial mentions, or mirrors of this wikipedia stub. Onel5969 TT me 11:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:NOTMEMORIAL, WP:BIO1E. Prod removed by article creator. "Petition" for MoH has not gone anywhere in several years, and it is unlikely that it will. MSJapan ( talk) 02:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Revert to dab. Black Kite (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
This article has been nominated because the contents are already included in Television networks preceding ABC Family. The article also infers that Fox Family is a standalone network when it was in point of fact an iteration of the existing cable channel now known as ABC Family (soon to become Freeform). As a result, a merger into either of the two mentioned articles is not necessary, and there is no justification to keeping the nominated article in any other event. TVtonightOKC ( talk) 21:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. no need for further comment. This is pure promotionalism. DGG ( talk ) 23:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Reason Rsriprac ( talk) 03:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Please see:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_of_biographies_and_BLPs
This person is relatively unknown. Reference sources do not exist or is of questionable credibility. IMDB profile also shows very little about this actress. Articles sounds like self-promotion article. Please queue this article for deletion.
Hi, Am the actual creator (User:Lamokahj) of Page /info/en/?search=Komal_Jha . The page i created was not for Self Promotion and the person listed in the Page is not unknown. There are many Links in the page which supports my claim. I agree that the subject here is a living person (upcoming actress) and hence there is not much details on IMDB Page. I would like to revoke the deletion decision of this article. However, if there is something in the article that has been added by random users which shows self promotion, please help us by deleting that improper content but not the whole article. Let me know if any concerns. 103.16.69.13 ( talk) 18:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We're Premier Pegasus Consultants LLP. We have a presence in India and our team has confirmed that the actor mentioned on this page is a known public figure. An upcoming actress, indeed - nevertheless, she has several films to her credit and it would be kind if the profile on Wikipedia could stay. In case you need citations from credible newspapers in the country, write to Simon Steele, our senior partner in the UK office [simon@premierpegasus.com [+44 (0) 203 695 3 734]] or Soumik Roy in our India office [soumik@premierpegasus.com]. Your support in this regard would be very kind.
@Rsriprac - You seem to slander and consider yourself an authority on the lives and businesses of people around the world. Please refrain from making libelous remarks against entities and people that you do not know about. Before questioning the agenda of those supporting this actor and her page, could you please clarify your motives? Your comments reek of malicious intent at every stage. Tread with caution. Your profile does indicate that you have spent your entire life contributing to these Wiki pages (and you would be respected for that) lest you try to use your past efforts to cover up wrongful acts. Your Wiki user-page says, "IF SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE ME OFFERS TO CREATE A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE FOR A FEE, IT IS NOT ME." That could indicate that you're taking the pains to stir trouble in the life of this actor because you're either being paid by someone to do so or because you have rotten plans in your head. I mean, if we were to "freely" speak our mind in our comments, those could be things we could accuse of. No? At the end of the day, I apologise if we've hurt you or your sentiments in any way. Let's forgive and forget and leave this page alone, as a favor to us and everyone else who is genuinely interested in this actor. Thank you!
For your reference, here are links to media articles about the actor. She is indeed famous, even if you don't know her. — PP SimonSteele ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/Komal-Jha-to-make-her-Bollywood-debut/articleshow/35481032.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/Will-Komal-Jha-be-second-time-lucky/articleshow/28292607.cms http://www.supergoodmovies.com/32032/sandalwood/komal-jha-is-nimbe-huli-herione-news-details
@PP_SimonSteele - You being Editor-in-Chief at Premier Pegasus and how motivated you are in creating an account to keeping this page alive makes make think of you having dubious motives. It is worth calling out that Premier Pegasus is a marketing/promotions company
http://premierpegasus.com/digital-marketing/4589922397, looks like a conflict of interest.
Rsriprac (
talk)
03:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Last year, a selfie took atop the Christ the Redeemer statue went viral, earning the photo a "UK Social Media Communications Award." Due to the viral-ness of it, there are plenty of sources, but I'm questioning the lasting notability of this event. Thus, I'm taking the issue here to get some feedback and consideration. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk) 20:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
An owner of two small-town radio stations and nothing else. The stations each have their own articles. Raymie ( t • c) 18:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not enough independent reliable coverage for this to pass WP:GNG. sst ✈ 16:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
What is the problem with this page, why you people recommended to Delete This, the data in this page has good Quality If Any one specify the Problem then any one may Correct the Page, Please Explain the Problem and provide any solution to for not to deletion of this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Royalprince474 ( talk • contribs) 17:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC) — Royalprince474 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was Speedied as A7 (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 16:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
BLP created by the article subject. All sources are WP:USERGENERATED. No evidence of notability. sst ✈ 15:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable local event. Articles such as this have already been deleted. KDS4444 Talk 15:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable local event. Articles such as this have already been deleted. KDS4444 Talk 15:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable local event. Article such as this have already been deleted. KDS4444 Talk 15:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable local event, other articles in this vein have been deleted in the recent past. Existing citations do not support a claim of notability to this event per se. KDS4444 Talk 15:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable magazine lacking non-trivial support reddogsix ( talk) 14:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:BAND. Sources are Facebook, blogs or passing mentions. Jbh Talk 14:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. If any of you four wanna move it I have no objections ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
None of the "references" in this article support a claim of notability for the subject of the article. Might be viable as a "List of literary festivals in India", but not a standalone article under this title. KDS4444 Talk 14:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Willing to userfy upon request. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. The only sources I can find are notes about acquisitions which fail WP:ORGDEPTH. Jbh Talk 14:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
"Outland", a comic strip by Berke Breathed which is well-known and quite popular; "Outlands", a comic strip by Davidson and Feeney, I came up empty handed. Article currently has no citations of its own to indicate otherwise. KDS4444 Talk 14:00, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Snow Keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
I do not believe this person meets notability criteria. Yes their existence is documemted: so is mine. I know iis not a valid argument, but did this wmaon actually do anything of real interest? TheLongTone ( talk) 13:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC) TheLongTone ( talk) 13:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7. Even if the author had not requested it would have come under CSD A7. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
i did not want to create a page Jagadish992 ( talk) 12:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Article about a writer for a website; no reliable source referencing within or to be found. Also article started by the subject and edited by someone else with close connection to the subject. Was PRODded earlier. — Spaceman Spiff 10:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Notability not established for this sublist. There are only 6 or so zoos / wildlife centres / similar with their own animal list on Wikipedia, and I'll prod the other ones (unless they have some real claim to notability as a list.) This one survived a prod in 2006, but I see no reason why the list of animals at a zoo would be a notable subject in most cases. Fram ( talk) 09:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I can find no sources for any of this, doesn't appear to pass the WP:GNG Theroadislong ( talk) 08:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. : no significance. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Autobio. 333 -blue 08:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Local sourcing for a thinly to almost none notable musician with my searches simply finding nothing better than this so this seems to have been a case of one event coverage and, in the rare case the band is independently notable, an article for that could be started and this moved there but I doubt there's much for an article considering again this seemed to have been a local musician with some passing 2010 & 2011 coverage. Pinging the only still active users Whpq and Paste. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep. Wrong venue. Article has already been nominated for AFD. Jim Carter 13:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Unworkable article name, trying to describe multiple events as one offensive. Content duplicates other articles. Legacypac ( talk) 07:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. With one exception, nobody is for keeping, and the two "merge" opinions do not say where to. Sandstein 11:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The title is unworkable. The content tries to call multiple offensives one offense. It duplicates Northwestern Syria offensive (October 2015) and the Russian intervention articles. See further comments on talk page by others seeking deletion. Legacypac ( talk) 07:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
comment Describing SOHR as 'independant' is jibbering derrangity. This article is unworkable, but it's cropped up because of the overwhelming bias of all syrian war articles, and the unwillingness of the wikipedia community to engage with them....essentially writing them off as not worth the hassle. It'd be better to dramatically cull syria war articles in general, and just have a very few where policies are actually enforced (such as RS, which, no, sohr isn't within a million miles of). 78.144.26.65 ( talk) 02:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No administrative action is required here. Nobody proposed redlinking any title and there is no justification for deleting the page history. Whether or not the British and Candadian etc houses have sufficient commonality for an overarching article is not a question best resolved at AfD. Spinning Spark 09:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
If someone wants the HoC in Britain or Canada, they'll probably get to this page and click the links in the specific bodies section to get to their house where they can get much more comprehensive detail into their HoC. This article just seems a bit redundant and prevents people from getting to the disambig page faster. ~ NottNott let's talk! contrib 18:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
"[i]f editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page"(see WP:ATD). This is a clearly a case where we should focus on improvement rather than deletion. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 08:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
"[i]f a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article". -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 01:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
"[i]f a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list."I have listed plenty of reliable, verifiable sources (see above) that discuss the shared history and function of the various Houses of Commons. A simple google search will reveal many more sources. I think a good analogy for how to proceed here would be to follow the model used article for senates. There are many senates around the world, but there are also enough reliable, verifiable sources about the common features of senates to justify a standalone article. At the bottom of the article for senate, there is a list of the various senates around the world. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 15:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. After improvements by Michig and Fayenatic London, now does not qualify for BLP Prod, and passes notability requirements, consensus is keep. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this but I'm still not sure if that would be enough improvement especially considering I'm not seeing much else (this also hasn't changed much since starting in February 2008). Pinging B, Klemen Kocjancic, Fayenatic london, Portnadler, Werldwayd, Geniac and DJ Clayworth. SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
My searches simply found nothing obvious so I'm not entirely sure if he actually existed and the only imaginable would likely be archived and not easily accessible (given this subject's alleged age). Pinging tagger Bender235 and Calamondin12. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
non notable shopping centre. Consists of a list of stores and no reason it is notable. noq ( talk) 22:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eddie and Sol Zakay. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Article about one individual already covered by Eddie and Sol Zakay and doesn't substantially add anything as subject isn't really notable outside Topland Group, the company he runs with his brother Eddie. Had nominated for WP:A10 but was declined by a mysterious IP. -- Non-Dropframe talk 15:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The Sol Zakay page should be kept because he is a separate person from Eddie Zakay. There is additional information about Sol Zakay on the page - regarding his support of Arsenal and his interest in football as well as his charitable giving which is distinct from that of his brother. A different page could be created for Eddie Zakay and the page EDDIE AND SOL ZAKAY could be deleted. This could make more sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HBarker ( talk • contribs) 11:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC) HBarker ( talk) 11:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had no in-depth coverage in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Most hits are either affiliated with the site's owner or attributing the origin of a story. Its main claim to fame was being named in a PC Mag 2005 listicle. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ ping}} me. czar 14:45, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drop me a note on my talk page and I'll consider salting it if anyone feels strongly about it. Funny to see what they used to a decade ago to salt pages before create protection. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Procedural for IP, as per usual I have no option on notability. shoy ( reactions) 13:09, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
IP's comments:
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
My searches simply found nothing to suggest better improvement and none has happened since starting in August 2008. Notifying author Artxprt. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly open and shut case of a local non-notable company with my best search results here and here and the awards are unlikely to be enough to save this article and lastly this has gotten few edits since starting in March 2008. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The article would certainly need improvement if kept and my searches found nothing to suggest better than this, this and this. For what it's worth, the current article is borderline speedy and but I nominated it for comments. Pinging past users MER-C, C.Fred and StAnselm. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Wales Air Network (WAN) were never official or noteworthy and has not actually existed for some time, not sure it is (or ever has been) worthy of a wikipedia page. The page was set up more as an advert rather than a usefeul educational entry. CloudSurferUK ( talk) 11:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
A radio jockey (Mumbaikars might know him as Picture Pandey) and cameo artist in some films fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Can't find much in RS to establish GNG. The sources currently used radioandmusic.com is part of Indiantelevision.com, which is a promotional site and notability of it has been questioned many times on wiki and consensus has been that it is non-RS. (Personally I would use these sites only for referring trivial things, like personal information through interviews published there; but not to establish notability.) Side note: The article is suspected of being created from COI editors/PR agency/cooperative editing - COI Noticeboard entry. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 04:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:CORP. Poorly sourced article. Ref #2 appears to be in part an interview ( this ref) - most paragraphs starting with "Saw said", "Saw Noted", and "He revealed", "Saw/he" being the companies CEO. Tried googling for news sources but just found name drops (well, one - there were others that seem unaffiliated with "Rockwills Group" that were still name drops). -- Kethrus | talk to me 03:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Every one of the references is essentially a disguised or direct press release. Being cited in a list of "40 under 40" or other list of junior achievers is essentially equal to" not yet notable" DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 16:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The page does not cite any sources; is poorly written and organized; may only be notable for the one event of Lamar Odom's overdose. Thus, I propose deletion. This page could also be merged into the Bunnyranch parent page. -- JumpLike23 (talk) 04:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
This is a contested PROD. As I said in the prod nomination, playing in the Philippine league does not satisfy the notability requirements in WP:NFOOTY. Being picked in a national futsal team may be a claim to notability, but I cannot find anything beyond a few routine mentions so there is not enough to satisy WP:GNG. Based on the username of the author, it is quite possible that the author is the subject. AtHomeIn神戸 ( talk) 04:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Actor with very questionable notability-also a auto bio Wgolf ( talk) 02:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable politician, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL specifically. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Apparently totally non-notable wine or grape variety (our article is not clear which, or if both). The village of Lierna lies within the Indicazione geografica protetta of the Terre Lariane (on which we should, but apparently do not, have an article). As far as I can see, "Bianco di Lierna" is not mentioned in:
As mentioned by FactStraight here, there seems to have been recent substantial and unencyclopaedic promotion of the village of Lierna and anyone and everything remotely associated with it. Given the total lack of coverage and the fact that the image illustrating the article is of vines growing at Birnau, Germany, on the shores of Lake Constance, the possibility of an outright hoax can't be completely discounted. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 16:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to John Rampton. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non notable book. Ireneshih ( talk) 15:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Probably non-notable American indie rock band; orphaned SPA-created article from 2006. No significant Google hits (although it's difficult to look for "The Dramas").Their MySpace page has only 10 songs in 3 years and almost no other info (looks long abandoned). The occasional usage of their songs in 2 TV series doesn't establish notability. Both members individually don't seem notable either on a quick Google search of their names. GermanJoe ( talk) 14:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable casino; only "source" is casino's own website. Orange Mike | Talk 15:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I'm renominating this with the exact same nomination information so hopefully we can get a consensus or else I may simply PROD it and, if he's notable, it can be restarted later. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionable notable gymnast who only seemed to have participated with the Scottish national team twice and my searches found no immediately obvious sourcing aside from a few links here. There's also no obvious move target but I would imagine an article such as List of Scottish national team gymnasts would be a good target. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable. Every reference is either not independent, or a mere notice (or both). Nothing more would be expected, because none of her positions are notable by any reasonable standard. Vice-chairman of a state agency is not generally notable.
The previous afd was closed as keep only for a technical reason: the nom was a banned sock. I was previously threatened by a self-declared employee of her agency that I would be reported and all my articles deleted if I attempted to remove the article on her or any other employee of that agency [27] (that account was of course blocked some time ago) To be fair, it was someone else entirely who wrote the article. DGG (at NYPL) -- reply here 18:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails google test. I dream of horses ( C) @ 01:39, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Can you help me understand what `fails google test` means? There are a handful of non-concerto-owned links on the first page of web search results for "Concerto Signage". Google Scholar also brings up at least 2 journal entries which discuss Concerto. Bamnet ( talk) 01:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep :@ Bamnet:I would assume I dream of horses is applying something along the lines of the "notability" test mentioned in Wikipedia:Search_engine_test. A quick glance at the Google results reveal nothing amiss, though "Concerto" is word in regular use, and the results will need to be viewed with that in mind. Certainly, a diversity of sources (beyond a search for a common word) and an evaluation of the citations should be used in this determination.
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a politician, notable primarily as the mayor of a small town with a population of just 600 and as an unsuccessful candidate for the leadership of a political party. Neither of these is a claim that gets a person over WP:NPOL — and while there is reliable source coverage here, it's all local and there isn't enough of it to get him over WP:GNG instead. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 21:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Article Kinoshita Junsuke was originally deleted 11 Nov. 2014 under BLPPROD and then recreated the next day by an SPA under the current title. A citation was added, so it could no longer be PRODed, but that link no longer works. The content of the article largely matches the subject's personal website ( [28]) and could be considered a copyright violation. I can determine that he did show a short film at the Tokatsu Film Festival (a small local festival in Japan) [29], but the site doesn't make clear if he won an award or not. The Russian wiki article on him ( ru:Киносита,_Дзюнсукэ) has the assertions about success at some Japanese film festival in Moscow tagged for problems. His Japanese wikipedia article was deleted in 2011 for lack of notability ( [30]). It seems he has also published a DVD on feng shui ( [31]), and filmed a documentary about the dancer Iwata Morihiro ( [32]), but there seem to be no independent RS out there discussing these. The only article I can find on him in Japanese is this (an interview: [33]), but it does not seem to be a reliable source. Perhaps there is something out there in Russian, but I can't find it. In short, this seems to be self-promotion of a figure who does not pass WP:GNG. Michitaro ( talk) 22:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 22:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
No reliable sources can be found for the person. The article is not eligible for BLPPROD since it was created in 2009. (Note: Completing AfD on request by IP 121.54.54.236.) Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spinning Spark 15:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
No indication of notability, no sources provided other than a link to the company's own website. My own search just turns up trivial mentions and press releases. mikeman67 ( talk) 17:48, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Although this list is accurate and correct, it is just a synthesis of different rankings. As those rankings already have this information, this is an unnecessary article. Natg 19 ( talk) 23:13, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO. Little depth of coverage in reliable sources. A few routine bios following her appointment, but little else. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Magnolia677 ( talk) 23:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Easily speedy and PROD material with its current state and my searches simply found nothing better than this (passing mention only about founder, not even about the company), this and this. It's also worth noting it seems the company may've started this in July 2009 and it simply hasn't changed since then. Pinging taggers Dialectric and Calaka. SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Since the only Keep rationales are based on the OBE, which does not confer automatic notability, and the subject has requested deletion, I think the outcom here is clear. Black Kite (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Despite receiving an OBE there is no indication Banjoko meets Wikipedia's standards of notability. Coverage consists of passing mentions only. The organization he founded may be notable; Banjoko himself does not meet WP:GNG. Sources are merely passing mentions, list entries, or Banjoko being quoted on his organization, not detailed coverage of Banjoko himself. Huon ( talk) 22:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Black Kite (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Considerably speedy and PROD material but as my searches found a few links here, here, here and here, I wanted comments to see if this can be improved. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. Her academic position is not notable; I searched Google Scholar and found nothing at all; I could find no reviews of her books, which may not be surprising since both were published in 2015. The preface to one of her books describes her as a "young" academic, maybe it's just WP:TOOSOON for her to have an article here. MelanieN ( talk) 21:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Here is one review of her book by Lesser, Emma, and Matthew W. Hughey. Review. “Getting Away with Murder: The Twentieth-Century Struggle for Civil Rights in the U.S. Senate / Vanessa A. Holloway” Ethnic and Racial Studies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavericktx ( talk • contribs) 13:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Her books were not both published in 2015. The first one was published December 15, 2014 and the second one was May 8, 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavericktx ( talk • contribs) 13:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Will you please kindly remove the page issues link on the top left corner of her page? She is a burgeoning scholar and has a new book about civil rights forthcoming with the University of Alabama Press titled, Discrimination in Agriculture: The USDA and Black Farmers' Elusive Quest for Acreage and Land Tenure in the Post-Civil Rights Era.
Please keep her page and remove the page issues link. Many thanks to wikipedia for support! So now when people google search her or her books, there is an article entry here for her as a scholar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavericktx ( talk • contribs) 03:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
When will her article entry be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mavericktx ( talk • contribs) 10:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:38, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The subject of this article fails to meet the standards of WP:N due to lack of multiple, non-trivial references in reliable, third-party sources, nor are there likely to be any because she was only "discovered" almost four decades after her death (thus we would not expect to find coverage in newspapers of the time etc.) The fact that she was World's Oldest Person in and of itself is irrelevant for determining if she should have a stand-alone article, since there's no Wikipedia policy on the oldest anything being automatically notable by the encyclopedia's standards (also based on long-term consensus, including most recently the redirecting of this World's oldest person). Thus we default to the general notability guidelines and any material of encyclopedic merit can be included on the many longevity-related lists on Wikipedia. Canadian Paul 21:35, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Raised at the biography noticeboard - Primary sources with no real evidence of notability. Previous AFD had one keep comment and to quote it, "Barely notable but I'm sure someone in the Comic area can improve it" - but no one did in 30 months and my Internet investigation revealed nothing that changed my mind that this person doesn't qualify for a wikipedia article. Govindaharihari ( talk) 20:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable footballer, only appearances are in Jamaican 3rd League (KSAFA Major League), which is not a fully professional league. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY Joseph2302 ( talk) 20:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Biographical SShyu01 ( talk) 20:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
*Keep - looks like a biog written by a paid acolyte or ghost writer. However the reason for deletion is farcical. Can a passing admin close this as a snow-ball keep and not waste any more time here.
Velella
Velella Talk
21:01, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
• Delete, the source links are broken — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SShyu01 (
talk •
contribs) 22:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC) The nominator can't vote in the discussion, the nomination itself counts as delete.
Onel5969
TT me
01:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. postdlf ( talk) 13:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
While the list would be interesting, it is mostly empty. There are some media articles on few select countries, but there does not seem to be a comprehensive list of state leader salaries and putting one together would be original research. Prod removed by original author without comment. Renata ( talk) 02:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Redneck rick ( talk) 14:02, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Contested prod. An annual convention which attracts a whopping 100 people speaks for the notability of the organization. No citations in current article. Non-notable association. Searches in News, Highbeam, and Newspapers returned zero results. Books returned some hits, but all appeared to be either trivial mentions, or mirrors of this wikipedia stub. Onel5969 TT me 11:55, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:NOTMEMORIAL, WP:BIO1E. Prod removed by article creator. "Petition" for MoH has not gone anywhere in several years, and it is unlikely that it will. MSJapan ( talk) 02:08, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was Revert to dab. Black Kite (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
This article has been nominated because the contents are already included in Television networks preceding ABC Family. The article also infers that Fox Family is a standalone network when it was in point of fact an iteration of the existing cable channel now known as ABC Family (soon to become Freeform). As a result, a merger into either of the two mentioned articles is not necessary, and there is no justification to keeping the nominated article in any other event. TVtonightOKC ( talk) 21:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. no need for further comment. This is pure promotionalism. DGG ( talk ) 23:21, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Reason Rsriprac ( talk) 03:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Please see:
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_of_biographies_and_BLPs
This person is relatively unknown. Reference sources do not exist or is of questionable credibility. IMDB profile also shows very little about this actress. Articles sounds like self-promotion article. Please queue this article for deletion.
Hi, Am the actual creator (User:Lamokahj) of Page /info/en/?search=Komal_Jha . The page i created was not for Self Promotion and the person listed in the Page is not unknown. There are many Links in the page which supports my claim. I agree that the subject here is a living person (upcoming actress) and hence there is not much details on IMDB Page. I would like to revoke the deletion decision of this article. However, if there is something in the article that has been added by random users which shows self promotion, please help us by deleting that improper content but not the whole article. Let me know if any concerns. 103.16.69.13 ( talk) 18:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. We're Premier Pegasus Consultants LLP. We have a presence in India and our team has confirmed that the actor mentioned on this page is a known public figure. An upcoming actress, indeed - nevertheless, she has several films to her credit and it would be kind if the profile on Wikipedia could stay. In case you need citations from credible newspapers in the country, write to Simon Steele, our senior partner in the UK office [simon@premierpegasus.com [+44 (0) 203 695 3 734]] or Soumik Roy in our India office [soumik@premierpegasus.com]. Your support in this regard would be very kind.
@Rsriprac - You seem to slander and consider yourself an authority on the lives and businesses of people around the world. Please refrain from making libelous remarks against entities and people that you do not know about. Before questioning the agenda of those supporting this actor and her page, could you please clarify your motives? Your comments reek of malicious intent at every stage. Tread with caution. Your profile does indicate that you have spent your entire life contributing to these Wiki pages (and you would be respected for that) lest you try to use your past efforts to cover up wrongful acts. Your Wiki user-page says, "IF SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE ME OFFERS TO CREATE A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE FOR A FEE, IT IS NOT ME." That could indicate that you're taking the pains to stir trouble in the life of this actor because you're either being paid by someone to do so or because you have rotten plans in your head. I mean, if we were to "freely" speak our mind in our comments, those could be things we could accuse of. No? At the end of the day, I apologise if we've hurt you or your sentiments in any way. Let's forgive and forget and leave this page alone, as a favor to us and everyone else who is genuinely interested in this actor. Thank you!
For your reference, here are links to media articles about the actor. She is indeed famous, even if you don't know her. — PP SimonSteele ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/Komal-Jha-to-make-her-Bollywood-debut/articleshow/35481032.cms http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movies/news/Will-Komal-Jha-be-second-time-lucky/articleshow/28292607.cms http://www.supergoodmovies.com/32032/sandalwood/komal-jha-is-nimbe-huli-herione-news-details
@PP_SimonSteele - You being Editor-in-Chief at Premier Pegasus and how motivated you are in creating an account to keeping this page alive makes make think of you having dubious motives. It is worth calling out that Premier Pegasus is a marketing/promotions company
http://premierpegasus.com/digital-marketing/4589922397, looks like a conflict of interest.
Rsriprac (
talk)
03:49, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 16:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Last year, a selfie took atop the Christ the Redeemer statue went viral, earning the photo a "UK Social Media Communications Award." Due to the viral-ness of it, there are plenty of sources, but I'm questioning the lasting notability of this event. Thus, I'm taking the issue here to get some feedback and consideration. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk) 20:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
An owner of two small-town radio stations and nothing else. The stations each have their own articles. Raymie ( t • c) 18:06, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not enough independent reliable coverage for this to pass WP:GNG. sst ✈ 16:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
What is the problem with this page, why you people recommended to Delete This, the data in this page has good Quality If Any one specify the Problem then any one may Correct the Page, Please Explain the Problem and provide any solution to for not to deletion of this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Royalprince474 ( talk • contribs) 17:08, 16 October 2015 (UTC) — Royalprince474 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was Speedied as A7 (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 16:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
BLP created by the article subject. All sources are WP:USERGENERATED. No evidence of notability. sst ✈ 15:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable local event. Articles such as this have already been deleted. KDS4444 Talk 15:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable local event. Articles such as this have already been deleted. KDS4444 Talk 15:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable local event. Article such as this have already been deleted. KDS4444 Talk 15:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable local event, other articles in this vein have been deleted in the recent past. Existing citations do not support a claim of notability to this event per se. KDS4444 Talk 15:37, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:21, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable magazine lacking non-trivial support reddogsix ( talk) 14:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:BAND. Sources are Facebook, blogs or passing mentions. Jbh Talk 14:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. If any of you four wanna move it I have no objections ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:58, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
None of the "references" in this article support a claim of notability for the subject of the article. Might be viable as a "List of literary festivals in India", but not a standalone article under this title. KDS4444 Talk 14:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Willing to userfy upon request. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. The only sources I can find are notes about acquisitions which fail WP:ORGDEPTH. Jbh Talk 14:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
"Outland", a comic strip by Berke Breathed which is well-known and quite popular; "Outlands", a comic strip by Davidson and Feeney, I came up empty handed. Article currently has no citations of its own to indicate otherwise. KDS4444 Talk 14:00, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Snow Keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:59, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
I do not believe this person meets notability criteria. Yes their existence is documemted: so is mine. I know iis not a valid argument, but did this wmaon actually do anything of real interest? TheLongTone ( talk) 13:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC) TheLongTone ( talk) 13:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. CSD G7. Even if the author had not requested it would have come under CSD A7. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
i did not want to create a page Jagadish992 ( talk) 12:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Article about a writer for a website; no reliable source referencing within or to be found. Also article started by the subject and edited by someone else with close connection to the subject. Was PRODded earlier. — Spaceman Spiff 10:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Notability not established for this sublist. There are only 6 or so zoos / wildlife centres / similar with their own animal list on Wikipedia, and I'll prod the other ones (unless they have some real claim to notability as a list.) This one survived a prod in 2006, but I see no reason why the list of animals at a zoo would be a notable subject in most cases. Fram ( talk) 09:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I can find no sources for any of this, doesn't appear to pass the WP:GNG Theroadislong ( talk) 08:55, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. : no significance. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:07, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Autobio. 333 -blue 08:26, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Local sourcing for a thinly to almost none notable musician with my searches simply finding nothing better than this so this seems to have been a case of one event coverage and, in the rare case the band is independently notable, an article for that could be started and this moved there but I doubt there's much for an article considering again this seemed to have been a local musician with some passing 2010 & 2011 coverage. Pinging the only still active users Whpq and Paste. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep. Wrong venue. Article has already been nominated for AFD. Jim Carter 13:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Unworkable article name, trying to describe multiple events as one offensive. Content duplicates other articles. Legacypac ( talk) 07:23, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. With one exception, nobody is for keeping, and the two "merge" opinions do not say where to. Sandstein 11:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The title is unworkable. The content tries to call multiple offensives one offense. It duplicates Northwestern Syria offensive (October 2015) and the Russian intervention articles. See further comments on talk page by others seeking deletion. Legacypac ( talk) 07:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
comment Describing SOHR as 'independant' is jibbering derrangity. This article is unworkable, but it's cropped up because of the overwhelming bias of all syrian war articles, and the unwillingness of the wikipedia community to engage with them....essentially writing them off as not worth the hassle. It'd be better to dramatically cull syria war articles in general, and just have a very few where policies are actually enforced (such as RS, which, no, sohr isn't within a million miles of). 78.144.26.65 ( talk) 02:34, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No administrative action is required here. Nobody proposed redlinking any title and there is no justification for deleting the page history. Whether or not the British and Candadian etc houses have sufficient commonality for an overarching article is not a question best resolved at AfD. Spinning Spark 09:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
If someone wants the HoC in Britain or Canada, they'll probably get to this page and click the links in the specific bodies section to get to their house where they can get much more comprehensive detail into their HoC. This article just seems a bit redundant and prevents people from getting to the disambig page faster. ~ NottNott let's talk! contrib 18:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
"[i]f editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page"(see WP:ATD). This is a clearly a case where we should focus on improvement rather than deletion. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 08:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
"[i]f a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article". -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 01:34, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
"[i]f a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list."I have listed plenty of reliable, verifiable sources (see above) that discuss the shared history and function of the various Houses of Commons. A simple google search will reveal many more sources. I think a good analogy for how to proceed here would be to follow the model used article for senates. There are many senates around the world, but there are also enough reliable, verifiable sources about the common features of senates to justify a standalone article. At the bottom of the article for senate, there is a list of the various senates around the world. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 15:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. After improvements by Michig and Fayenatic London, now does not qualify for BLP Prod, and passes notability requirements, consensus is keep. ( non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionably notable and improvable as the best I found was this but I'm still not sure if that would be enough improvement especially considering I'm not seeing much else (this also hasn't changed much since starting in February 2008). Pinging B, Klemen Kocjancic, Fayenatic london, Portnadler, Werldwayd, Geniac and DJ Clayworth. SwisterTwister talk 06:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
My searches simply found nothing obvious so I'm not entirely sure if he actually existed and the only imaginable would likely be archived and not easily accessible (given this subject's alleged age). Pinging tagger Bender235 and Calamondin12. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 00:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
non notable shopping centre. Consists of a list of stores and no reason it is notable. noq ( talk) 22:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Eddie and Sol Zakay. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 00:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Article about one individual already covered by Eddie and Sol Zakay and doesn't substantially add anything as subject isn't really notable outside Topland Group, the company he runs with his brother Eddie. Had nominated for WP:A10 but was declined by a mysterious IP. -- Non-Dropframe talk 15:49, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The Sol Zakay page should be kept because he is a separate person from Eddie Zakay. There is additional information about Sol Zakay on the page - regarding his support of Arsenal and his interest in football as well as his charitable giving which is distinct from that of his brother. A different page could be created for Eddie Zakay and the page EDDIE AND SOL ZAKAY could be deleted. This could make more sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HBarker ( talk • contribs) 11:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC) HBarker ( talk) 11:39, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) It had no in-depth coverage in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Most hits are either affiliated with the site's owner or attributing the origin of a story. Its main claim to fame was being named in a PC Mag 2005 listicle. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ ping}} me. czar 14:45, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Drop me a note on my talk page and I'll consider salting it if anyone feels strongly about it. Funny to see what they used to a decade ago to salt pages before create protection. Jenks24 ( talk) 04:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Procedural for IP, as per usual I have no option on notability. shoy ( reactions) 13:09, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
IP's comments:
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
My searches simply found nothing to suggest better improvement and none has happened since starting in August 2008. Notifying author Artxprt. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly open and shut case of a local non-notable company with my best search results here and here and the awards are unlikely to be enough to save this article and lastly this has gotten few edits since starting in March 2008. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
The article would certainly need improvement if kept and my searches found nothing to suggest better than this, this and this. For what it's worth, the current article is borderline speedy and but I nominated it for comments. Pinging past users MER-C, C.Fred and StAnselm. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Wales Air Network (WAN) were never official or noteworthy and has not actually existed for some time, not sure it is (or ever has been) worthy of a wikipedia page. The page was set up more as an advert rather than a usefeul educational entry. CloudSurferUK ( talk) 11:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
A radio jockey (Mumbaikars might know him as Picture Pandey) and cameo artist in some films fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Can't find much in RS to establish GNG. The sources currently used radioandmusic.com is part of Indiantelevision.com, which is a promotional site and notability of it has been questioned many times on wiki and consensus has been that it is non-RS. (Personally I would use these sites only for referring trivial things, like personal information through interviews published there; but not to establish notability.) Side note: The article is suspected of being created from COI editors/PR agency/cooperative editing - COI Noticeboard entry. §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 04:15, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:CORP. Poorly sourced article. Ref #2 appears to be in part an interview ( this ref) - most paragraphs starting with "Saw said", "Saw Noted", and "He revealed", "Saw/he" being the companies CEO. Tried googling for news sources but just found name drops (well, one - there were others that seem unaffiliated with "Rockwills Group" that were still name drops). -- Kethrus | talk to me 03:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Every one of the references is essentially a disguised or direct press release. Being cited in a list of "40 under 40" or other list of junior achievers is essentially equal to" not yet notable" DGG ( talk ) 04:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 16:04, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
The page does not cite any sources; is poorly written and organized; may only be notable for the one event of Lamar Odom's overdose. Thus, I propose deletion. This page could also be merged into the Bunnyranch parent page. -- JumpLike23 (talk) 04:31, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
This is a contested PROD. As I said in the prod nomination, playing in the Philippine league does not satisfy the notability requirements in WP:NFOOTY. Being picked in a national futsal team may be a claim to notability, but I cannot find anything beyond a few routine mentions so there is not enough to satisy WP:GNG. Based on the username of the author, it is quite possible that the author is the subject. AtHomeIn神戸 ( talk) 04:10, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Actor with very questionable notability-also a auto bio Wgolf ( talk) 02:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable politician, fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL specifically. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Apparently totally non-notable wine or grape variety (our article is not clear which, or if both). The village of Lierna lies within the Indicazione geografica protetta of the Terre Lariane (on which we should, but apparently do not, have an article). As far as I can see, "Bianco di Lierna" is not mentioned in:
As mentioned by FactStraight here, there seems to have been recent substantial and unencyclopaedic promotion of the village of Lierna and anyone and everything remotely associated with it. Given the total lack of coverage and the fact that the image illustrating the article is of vines growing at Birnau, Germany, on the shores of Lake Constance, the possibility of an outright hoax can't be completely discounted. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 16:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to John Rampton. ( non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 04:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non notable book. Ireneshih ( talk) 15:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:08, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Probably non-notable American indie rock band; orphaned SPA-created article from 2006. No significant Google hits (although it's difficult to look for "The Dramas").Their MySpace page has only 10 songs in 3 years and almost no other info (looks long abandoned). The occasional usage of their songs in 2 TV series doesn't establish notability. Both members individually don't seem notable either on a quick Google search of their names. GermanJoe ( talk) 14:12, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable casino; only "source" is casino's own website. Orange Mike | Talk 15:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
I'm renominating this with the exact same nomination information so hopefully we can get a consensus or else I may simply PROD it and, if he's notable, it can be restarted later. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Questionable notable gymnast who only seemed to have participated with the Scottish national team twice and my searches found no immediately obvious sourcing aside from a few links here. There's also no obvious move target but I would imagine an article such as List of Scottish national team gymnasts would be a good target. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable. Every reference is either not independent, or a mere notice (or both). Nothing more would be expected, because none of her positions are notable by any reasonable standard. Vice-chairman of a state agency is not generally notable.
The previous afd was closed as keep only for a technical reason: the nom was a banned sock. I was previously threatened by a self-declared employee of her agency that I would be reported and all my articles deleted if I attempted to remove the article on her or any other employee of that agency [27] (that account was of course blocked some time ago) To be fair, it was someone else entirely who wrote the article. DGG (at NYPL) -- reply here 18:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 11:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Fails google test. I dream of horses ( C) @ 01:39, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Can you help me understand what `fails google test` means? There are a handful of non-concerto-owned links on the first page of web search results for "Concerto Signage". Google Scholar also brings up at least 2 journal entries which discuss Concerto. Bamnet ( talk) 01:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
Keep :@ Bamnet:I would assume I dream of horses is applying something along the lines of the "notability" test mentioned in Wikipedia:Search_engine_test. A quick glance at the Google results reveal nothing amiss, though "Concerto" is word in regular use, and the results will need to be viewed with that in mind. Certainly, a diversity of sources (beyond a search for a common word) and an evaluation of the citations should be used in this determination.
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a politician, notable primarily as the mayor of a small town with a population of just 600 and as an unsuccessful candidate for the leadership of a political party. Neither of these is a claim that gets a person over WP:NPOL — and while there is reliable source coverage here, it's all local and there isn't enough of it to get him over WP:GNG instead. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 21:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jenks24 ( talk) 05:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Article Kinoshita Junsuke was originally deleted 11 Nov. 2014 under BLPPROD and then recreated the next day by an SPA under the current title. A citation was added, so it could no longer be PRODed, but that link no longer works. The content of the article largely matches the subject's personal website ( [28]) and could be considered a copyright violation. I can determine that he did show a short film at the Tokatsu Film Festival (a small local festival in Japan) [29], but the site doesn't make clear if he won an award or not. The Russian wiki article on him ( ru:Киносита,_Дзюнсукэ) has the assertions about success at some Japanese film festival in Moscow tagged for problems. His Japanese wikipedia article was deleted in 2011 for lack of notability ( [30]). It seems he has also published a DVD on feng shui ( [31]), and filmed a documentary about the dancer Iwata Morihiro ( [32]), but there seem to be no independent RS out there discussing these. The only article I can find on him in Japanese is this (an interview: [33]), but it does not seem to be a reliable source. Perhaps there is something out there in Russian, but I can't find it. In short, this seems to be self-promotion of a figure who does not pass WP:GNG. Michitaro ( talk) 22:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)