![]() |
The result was delete. Valley2 city‽ 02:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Lack of notability. Does not mention a single acting role. IMDB page only lists youtube videos. Not notable as a musician either HoarseHorsie ( talk) 00:04, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Valley2 city‽ 02:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, claims to be a "fan-made bootleg" Le Deluge ( talk) 22:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Closing discussion. Article was G5 speedied. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Consistent blanking of this page, anyway unneeded filmography is going on here. Wgolf ( talk) 22:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Article created on a person who was elected to the Knesset in Israel's recent elections. However, they have opted not to take up their seat, so will not have been a Knesset member. Thus they fail WP:POLITICIAN (and being a mayor of Safed, a small town in the north of Israel) is not really sufficient to confer notability. Prod removed by an IP without explanation. Number 5 7 21:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 15:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM. Should be redirected to Patrick Street/ Karlhard ( talk) 20:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article's subject is found to be notable, per the sources provided below. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable domestic violence (murder-suicide) case involving non-notable persons. No significant coverage beyond local news, no legal precedents. Fails WP:CRIME and WP:NOTNEWS. I also find it bizarre that the murderer and his victim are given a joint biography. - hahnch e n 20:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Nominator comment - Despite the NYTimes and Fortune sources above, I'm reiterating my stance in favour of deletion. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, I'd expect significantly more coverage of a news event for it to be considered in an encyclopedia, I'd expect national sources to dedicate articles to the crime, not have a few paragraph on it half-way down on a page filled with other murders. Had it been a cultural object, such as a video game, we'd expect previews, reviews and interviews in national-level publications - we have none of this here. - hahnch e n 21:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete under G12 by Materialscientist. ( non-admin closure) Altamel ( talk) 23:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Prod removed multiple times by author. Could not see any signs of notability. Lakun.patra ( talk) 19:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. NN for now. Valley2 city‽ 02:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Notability is in question-the show Krem is not on here and can't find if it is notable or not. Now maybe a expert in Turkish actresses could help here. Wgolf ( talk) 19:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
The is not a shred of information about the language spoken by the ages extict Old Prussian tribe of Nadruvians, nor whether they have a separate tongue at all, nor who they were. Staszek Lem ( talk) 19:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Drafts should be discussed at WP:MfD. ( non-admin closure) ansh 666 20:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
WP:Articles for deletion/Madumita Digital Studio is in discussion. Draftifying makes a way to escape deletion. – nafSadh did say 18:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about an "upcoming" web series, making no claim of notability that would satisfy either WP:NMEDIA or WP:WEB. While it does have an IMDb page which confirms that it aired in 2013, the mere existence of an IMDb profile is not a notability freebie in and of itself — I did both general web and news searches on Google, as well, but found nothing like the volume of media coverage it would take to make this something that Wikipedia should have an article about (especially not one that's so poorly maintained that it still describes a two-year-old series as "upcoming"). Per WP:NOTINHERITED, further, the fact that a couple of people who were already notable for other things were involved in it does not, in and of itself, constitute a notability freebie either, if the series isn't itself the subject of any media coverage in its own right. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 17:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The community participating in this discussion was unable to establish whether precedent outweighed WP:NHSCHOOL. (Note: this close does not necessarily mean that the subject is notable; instead, it finds that the editors participating in the discussion were unable - and others will most likely be unable - to establish whether it was notable or not.) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
There are contradictions on the page itself, claiming to serve grades 1-12, while being named a Senior Secondary School, which would imply 11-12. I suggest merging into Hindaun#Education or a new list of the local schools if needed per Wikipedia:Notability (high_schools)#If it.27s not notable. The school does not pass WP:NGO per WP:NHSCHOOL, so while it does seem to exist, an article on it does not seem appropriate. Jerodlycett ( talk) 17:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
(Emphasis expanded from original.) As for your sources, the two sources you've linked above are not reliable and even if they were, we'd need more than something than directories — which amount to passing references — which merely indicate existence. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 16:31, 30 March 2015 (UTC)This page is not a policy or guideline, and previous outcomes do not bind future ones because consensus can change. The community's actual notability guidelines are listed in the template at the right. Notability always requires verifiable evidence, and all articles on all subjects are kept or deleted on the basis of sources showing their notability, not their subjective importance or relationship to something else. All articles should be evaluated individually on their merits and their ability to conform to standard content policies such as WP:Verifiability and WP:Neutral point of view. ... Avoid over-reliance on citing these "common outcomes" when stating one's case at Articles for Deletion. While precedents can be useful in helping to resolve notability challenges, editors are not necessarily bound to follow past practice. When push comes to shove, notability is demonstrated by the mustering of evidence that an article topic is the subject of multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in trustworthy independent sources.
The result was delete. North America 1000 07:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable software. Prod contested by article creator, who appears to share a last name with the writer of the software. I found no independent references, and none are provided. -- Finngall talk 17:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 07:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Blatantly fails WP:GNG. Bypassed several AfC declines. FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 17:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 07:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I find notability unclear: fewer than 100 Google hits in total (not sure how many of them can be considered to be giving substantial coverage), and no references in the article. For what it's worth, the article says the pageant was founded in 2011 but a photo carousel I came across purports to show shorts from the 2010 event, leading me to wonder whether they're two different events with the same name. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 17:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable businessman with basically no reliable information available. I did initially try to edit it down to something reasonable (previous version here) but the result is (at best) a poorly cited barebones CV. Nik the stunned 17:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Actress who has an amazing 2 roles! And has not been in anything since-the Swedish wiki is the same, not much info at all. Wgolf ( talk) 17:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 07:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable film. No evidence of any significant coverage for this film, either under its English title or its Polish title. PROD removed by article author, stating "this is a new film. Coverage will come." When (if) coverage comes, the article can be re-created. But for now, we have nothing on which to build a verifiable article. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources found, problem solved. (Although I would kindly suggest the nom reads " WP:BEFORE" before nominating.) ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Article not containing even a single source. Regards, KunalForYou Contribs Talk 15:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Queried speedy delete for notability Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 16:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Donut Kings. Don't see anything to merge. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Evacuation Possible Wgolf ( talk) 15:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Donut Kings. Don't see anything to merge. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Evacuation Possible Wgolf ( talk) 15:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
A album that probably should be redirected to the band, see also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Evacuation Possible Wgolf ( talk) 15:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Donut Kings. Don't see anything useful to merge ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Album that would probably be the best to be redirected to the band. Wgolf ( talk) 15:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Possibly unotable backup application (made by a promo account) that also looks like it falls under too soon even. Wgolf ( talk) 15:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 14:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Ligue Francophone de Football Amercain de Belgique. Sam Walton ( talk) 09:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 14:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Musical Youth. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Bio for late bassist for Musical Youth. No references here and no evidence of notability independently of the band. Attempts to redirect to band page reverted by article author. If consensus is to not keep the article, then I propose restoring the redirect and protecting it from further editing. -- Finngall talk 13:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Deleted as G12 (copy vio). Diannaa ( talk) 22:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Lack of significance and promotional tone. Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 11:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. No reviews, charting, good sales (gold). Notability is not inherited from the labels or bands. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 10:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
no apparent critical comment, no works in major museums. Individual items in magazines. DGG ( talk ) 09:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak per WP:CSD#G5. ( non-admin closure) Everymorning talk 14:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Game doesn't appear to be notable. -- haminoon ( talk) 09:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn by nominator Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Subject has received passing mention in multiple reliable sources but none that appear to be significant coverage, therefore subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Furthermore, subject does not appear to be notable as set forth in WP:ANYBIO or WP:MUSBIO. Therefore, I propose that this article be deleted. RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 06:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Mr. Ponnanna doesn't meet WP:GNG. He is a candidate for the Karnataka Legislative Assembly but he doesn't hold any elected position at the present, except that he is president of a students' union. The organizations he is a member of aren't notable. The party he started and leads, Yuva Bharath Party, is a newly formed party with minimal news coverage. He also leads Yuva Codava, that is a young and small organization (200+ members according to the article) and also with minimal news coverage. Sjö ( talk) 06:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 10:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable scenic designer and art director lacking non-trivial support. Awards appear to be minor/local. reddogsix ( talk) 03:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Hollywood Heights (TV series) -- Mdann52 ( talk) 17:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Non-notable actor, references are to IMDB and the subjects website with a few that don't seem to mention him at all. I have searched a bit and cant find much about him other than bios and tabloid websites. TheMesquito buzz 01:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn by nominator. Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 20:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Film lacks notability. No WP:RSes have established its notability as a film. Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 05:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator ( non-admin closure). ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 03:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
withdrawn by nom This is a good faith AfD and I'm sorry if im blindly missing some policy point. Maybe it's that I don't understand what an international school is (public v. private?) but I don't see why this school meets notability criteria. However, if it has the same equivalent as a U.S. high school and not just some private enterprise, maybe it's more complicated? Gaff ( talk) 04:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice against creation of separate list articles based upon the Wikipedia categories of Category:Garage rock compilation albums and Category:Psychedelic rock compilation albums. North America 1000 08:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
A list with no references and filled with mostly redlinks, should fall under WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:NOTREPOSITORY. TheMesquito buzz 01:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
However, I'm not clear on why these two genres are being listed together, unless it's just because of the Nuggets series apparently doing so (though Allmusic has called that compilation series "of seismic importance"). postdlf ( talk) 20:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect. Daniel ( talk) 10:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe Hani is independently notable outside of EXID. She's in a few reality shows, but I think it's too soon for an individual article. WP:BAND states this: Note that members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases. Singers and musicians who are only notable for participating in a reality television series may be redirected to an article about the series, until they have demonstrated they are independently notable. Random86 ( talk) 07:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
There's nothing even to merge to EXID ? I disagree. Hani's name in Hangul, and other personal details. If she does not currently deserve a separate article, these things should at least be added to the EXID one. Gavin ( talk) 09:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 09:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY but it was deprodded by editor who felt it needed full evaluation and could possibly meet WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 07:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
This methodology does not demonstrate that it is used outside of the University of Warwick, and thus does not demonstrate how it is notable. Primefac ( talk) 10:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. MichaelQSchmidt's point is the most compelling here, but there does not seem to be a clear consensus that it makes the article's subject fully notable. Therefore, this discussion is found to have not established (via consensus) whether or not the article's subject is notable, nor whether it should be deleted. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Not
notable. Looks to have a very impressive list of awards but none of them are major. Some are extremely minor. Has a
ridiculous number of sources but there is a lack of good sources. Most are just listings. If no sources were found, just make some
[12]
[13]
[14]. The is a lack of coverage about this film. In the current version there is no in depth reviews from recognised critics. A search found none.
A look at some of the sources.
2.
The McIvor Times
(from
Heathcote, Victoria, circulation 987
[15])
6. Golden Palmera Film Festival.
10. House of Shorts
This is advertising from paid spammers. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. One of his films appears to have a very impressive list of awards (many for him) but none of them are major. Some are extremely minor. Has a ridiculous number of sources but there is a lack of good sources. Most are just listings. If no sources were found, just make some [16] [17] [18]. The is a lack of coverage about Playne. In the current version there is local interest puff piece [19] that has any depth of coverage about him. A search found none better. This is advertising from paid spammers. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to More popular than Jesus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this magazine meets WP:NOTABILITY. A WP:COI editor for a company named 'Datebook' has been edit warring to overwrite this, so prod was removed that way. The article should remain on the magazine, and then the dating company could be moved here if this is deleted. Boleyn ( talk) 12:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 13:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
WP:GNG Does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. There is a paucity of secondary sources that could contribute to an article about this person. User: LittleT889 ( User talk: LittleT889) 10:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
This needs to be more widely circulated - he seems notable in Peru, but I am not fluent in Spanish NealeFamily ( talk) 07:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Article is about an animator with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish general notability nor that for creative professionals. Whpq ( talk) 12:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Unotable former child star with only 2 roles (though I do find it amusing that she played a young Whoopi Goldberg in both of them) Wgolf ( talk) 00:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
WP:IMPORTANCE -- not notable, from an editorial sponsored by software-defined networking company, Brocade Communications Systems. nenolod ( talk) ( edits) 13:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Additional background is seen in the article it came from -- [20], there was no mention of "the new IP" in relation to networking until then, in fact, a google search for "the new IP" shows lots of listings about intellectual property; not networking. My conclusion is that it's just wiki spam, and should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nenolod ( talk • contribs) 13:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G5, blocked user creation. Ged UK 13:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Long song list with only unreliable sources-also kind of is a duplicate of the article that has a discography for this artist that I found. Wgolf ( talk) 16:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Article is an unsourced stub, not evidence of notability. Joseph2302 ( talk) 20:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Delete as proposer. Joseph2302 ( talk) 20:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Valley2 city‽ 02:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Lack of notability. Does not mention a single acting role. IMDB page only lists youtube videos. Not notable as a musician either HoarseHorsie ( talk) 00:04, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Valley2 city‽ 02:46, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, claims to be a "fan-made bootleg" Le Deluge ( talk) 22:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Closing discussion. Article was G5 speedied. Schmidt, Michael Q. 00:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Consistent blanking of this page, anyway unneeded filmography is going on here. Wgolf ( talk) 22:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Esquivalience t 00:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Article created on a person who was elected to the Knesset in Israel's recent elections. However, they have opted not to take up their seat, so will not have been a Knesset member. Thus they fail WP:POLITICIAN (and being a mayor of Safed, a small town in the north of Israel) is not really sufficient to confer notability. Prod removed by an IP without explanation. Number 5 7 21:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 15:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NALBUM. Should be redirected to Patrick Street/ Karlhard ( talk) 20:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. The article's subject is found to be notable, per the sources provided below. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable domestic violence (murder-suicide) case involving non-notable persons. No significant coverage beyond local news, no legal precedents. Fails WP:CRIME and WP:NOTNEWS. I also find it bizarre that the murderer and his victim are given a joint biography. - hahnch e n 20:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Nominator comment - Despite the NYTimes and Fortune sources above, I'm reiterating my stance in favour of deletion. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, I'd expect significantly more coverage of a news event for it to be considered in an encyclopedia, I'd expect national sources to dedicate articles to the crime, not have a few paragraph on it half-way down on a page filled with other murders. Had it been a cultural object, such as a video game, we'd expect previews, reviews and interviews in national-level publications - we have none of this here. - hahnch e n 21:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete under G12 by Materialscientist. ( non-admin closure) Altamel ( talk) 23:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Prod removed multiple times by author. Could not see any signs of notability. Lakun.patra ( talk) 19:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. NN for now. Valley2 city‽ 02:49, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Notability is in question-the show Krem is not on here and can't find if it is notable or not. Now maybe a expert in Turkish actresses could help here. Wgolf ( talk) 19:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
The is not a shred of information about the language spoken by the ages extict Old Prussian tribe of Nadruvians, nor whether they have a separate tongue at all, nor who they were. Staszek Lem ( talk) 19:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Drafts should be discussed at WP:MfD. ( non-admin closure) ansh 666 20:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
WP:Articles for deletion/Madumita Digital Studio is in discussion. Draftifying makes a way to escape deletion. – nafSadh did say 18:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Completely unsourced article about an "upcoming" web series, making no claim of notability that would satisfy either WP:NMEDIA or WP:WEB. While it does have an IMDb page which confirms that it aired in 2013, the mere existence of an IMDb profile is not a notability freebie in and of itself — I did both general web and news searches on Google, as well, but found nothing like the volume of media coverage it would take to make this something that Wikipedia should have an article about (especially not one that's so poorly maintained that it still describes a two-year-old series as "upcoming"). Per WP:NOTINHERITED, further, the fact that a couple of people who were already notable for other things were involved in it does not, in and of itself, constitute a notability freebie either, if the series isn't itself the subject of any media coverage in its own right. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 17:58, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The community participating in this discussion was unable to establish whether precedent outweighed WP:NHSCHOOL. (Note: this close does not necessarily mean that the subject is notable; instead, it finds that the editors participating in the discussion were unable - and others will most likely be unable - to establish whether it was notable or not.) — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:33, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
There are contradictions on the page itself, claiming to serve grades 1-12, while being named a Senior Secondary School, which would imply 11-12. I suggest merging into Hindaun#Education or a new list of the local schools if needed per Wikipedia:Notability (high_schools)#If it.27s not notable. The school does not pass WP:NGO per WP:NHSCHOOL, so while it does seem to exist, an article on it does not seem appropriate. Jerodlycett ( talk) 17:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
(Emphasis expanded from original.) As for your sources, the two sources you've linked above are not reliable and even if they were, we'd need more than something than directories — which amount to passing references — which merely indicate existence. Regards, TransporterMan ( TALK) 16:31, 30 March 2015 (UTC)This page is not a policy or guideline, and previous outcomes do not bind future ones because consensus can change. The community's actual notability guidelines are listed in the template at the right. Notability always requires verifiable evidence, and all articles on all subjects are kept or deleted on the basis of sources showing their notability, not their subjective importance or relationship to something else. All articles should be evaluated individually on their merits and their ability to conform to standard content policies such as WP:Verifiability and WP:Neutral point of view. ... Avoid over-reliance on citing these "common outcomes" when stating one's case at Articles for Deletion. While precedents can be useful in helping to resolve notability challenges, editors are not necessarily bound to follow past practice. When push comes to shove, notability is demonstrated by the mustering of evidence that an article topic is the subject of multiple instances of non-trivial coverage in trustworthy independent sources.
The result was delete. North America 1000 07:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable software. Prod contested by article creator, who appears to share a last name with the writer of the software. I found no independent references, and none are provided. -- Finngall talk 17:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 07:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Blatantly fails WP:GNG. Bypassed several AfC declines. FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 17:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 07:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I find notability unclear: fewer than 100 Google hits in total (not sure how many of them can be considered to be giving substantial coverage), and no references in the article. For what it's worth, the article says the pageant was founded in 2011 but a photo carousel I came across purports to show shorts from the 2010 event, leading me to wonder whether they're two different events with the same name. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 17:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable businessman with basically no reliable information available. I did initially try to edit it down to something reasonable (previous version here) but the result is (at best) a poorly cited barebones CV. Nik the stunned 17:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Actress who has an amazing 2 roles! And has not been in anything since-the Swedish wiki is the same, not much info at all. Wgolf ( talk) 17:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 07:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable film. No evidence of any significant coverage for this film, either under its English title or its Polish title. PROD removed by article author, stating "this is a new film. Coverage will come." When (if) coverage comes, the article can be re-created. But for now, we have nothing on which to build a verifiable article. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 16:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sources found, problem solved. (Although I would kindly suggest the nom reads " WP:BEFORE" before nominating.) ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Article not containing even a single source. Regards, KunalForYou Contribs Talk 15:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Queried speedy delete for notability Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 16:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Donut Kings. Don't see anything to merge. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Evacuation Possible Wgolf ( talk) 15:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Donut Kings. Don't see anything to merge. ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:27, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
See: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Evacuation Possible Wgolf ( talk) 15:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
A album that probably should be redirected to the band, see also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Evacuation Possible Wgolf ( talk) 15:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Donut Kings. Don't see anything useful to merge ( non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:25, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Album that would probably be the best to be redirected to the band. Wgolf ( talk) 15:45, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Possibly unotable backup application (made by a promo account) that also looks like it falls under too soon even. Wgolf ( talk) 15:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:53, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 14:12, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was merge to Ligue Francophone de Football Amercain de Belgique. Sam Walton ( talk) 09:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 14:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Musical Youth. ( non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 03:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Bio for late bassist for Musical Youth. No references here and no evidence of notability independently of the band. Attempts to redirect to band page reverted by article author. If consensus is to not keep the article, then I propose restoring the redirect and protecting it from further editing. -- Finngall talk 13:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Deleted as G12 (copy vio). Diannaa ( talk) 22:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Lack of significance and promotional tone. Ibrahim Husain Meraj ( talk) 11:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. No reviews, charting, good sales (gold). Notability is not inherited from the labels or bands. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 10:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
no apparent critical comment, no works in major museums. Individual items in magazines. DGG ( talk ) 09:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak per WP:CSD#G5. ( non-admin closure) Everymorning talk 14:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Game doesn't appear to be notable. -- haminoon ( talk) 09:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn by nominator Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Subject has received passing mention in multiple reliable sources but none that appear to be significant coverage, therefore subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Furthermore, subject does not appear to be notable as set forth in WP:ANYBIO or WP:MUSBIO. Therefore, I propose that this article be deleted. RightCowLeftCoast ( talk) 06:23, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Mr. Ponnanna doesn't meet WP:GNG. He is a candidate for the Karnataka Legislative Assembly but he doesn't hold any elected position at the present, except that he is president of a students' union. The organizations he is a member of aren't notable. The party he started and leads, Yuva Bharath Party, is a newly formed party with minimal news coverage. He also leads Yuva Codava, that is a young and small organization (200+ members according to the article) and also with minimal news coverage. Sjö ( talk) 06:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK Coolabahapple ( talk) 06:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. North America 1000 10:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable scenic designer and art director lacking non-trivial support. Awards appear to be minor/local. reddogsix ( talk) 03:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Hollywood Heights (TV series) -- Mdann52 ( talk) 17:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Non-notable actor, references are to IMDB and the subjects website with a few that don't seem to mention him at all. I have searched a bit and cant find much about him other than bios and tabloid websites. TheMesquito buzz 01:16, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn by nominator. Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 20:20, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Film lacks notability. No WP:RSes have established its notability as a film. Shibbolethink ( ♔ ♕) 05:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn by nominator ( non-admin closure). ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 03:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
withdrawn by nom This is a good faith AfD and I'm sorry if im blindly missing some policy point. Maybe it's that I don't understand what an international school is (public v. private?) but I don't see why this school meets notability criteria. However, if it has the same equivalent as a U.S. high school and not just some private enterprise, maybe it's more complicated? Gaff ( talk) 04:21, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. No prejudice against creation of separate list articles based upon the Wikipedia categories of Category:Garage rock compilation albums and Category:Psychedelic rock compilation albums. North America 1000 08:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
A list with no references and filled with mostly redlinks, should fall under WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:NOTREPOSITORY. TheMesquito buzz 01:40, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
However, I'm not clear on why these two genres are being listed together, unless it's just because of the Nuggets series apparently doing so (though Allmusic has called that compilation series "of seismic importance"). postdlf ( talk) 20:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect. Daniel ( talk) 10:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't believe Hani is independently notable outside of EXID. She's in a few reality shows, but I think it's too soon for an individual article. WP:BAND states this: Note that members of notable bands are redirected to the band's article, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band, such as solo releases. Singers and musicians who are only notable for participating in a reality television series may be redirected to an article about the series, until they have demonstrated they are independently notable. Random86 ( talk) 07:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
There's nothing even to merge to EXID ? I disagree. Hani's name in Hangul, and other personal details. If she does not currently deserve a separate article, these things should at least be added to the EXID one. Gavin ( talk) 09:29, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 09:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY but it was deprodded by editor who felt it needed full evaluation and could possibly meet WP:GNG Boleyn ( talk) 07:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:49, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
This methodology does not demonstrate that it is used outside of the University of Warwick, and thus does not demonstrate how it is notable. Primefac ( talk) 10:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. MichaelQSchmidt's point is the most compelling here, but there does not seem to be a clear consensus that it makes the article's subject fully notable. Therefore, this discussion is found to have not established (via consensus) whether or not the article's subject is notable, nor whether it should be deleted. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Not
notable. Looks to have a very impressive list of awards but none of them are major. Some are extremely minor. Has a
ridiculous number of sources but there is a lack of good sources. Most are just listings. If no sources were found, just make some
[12]
[13]
[14]. The is a lack of coverage about this film. In the current version there is no in depth reviews from recognised critics. A search found none.
A look at some of the sources.
2.
The McIvor Times
(from
Heathcote, Victoria, circulation 987
[15])
6. Golden Palmera Film Festival.
10. House of Shorts
This is advertising from paid spammers. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 10:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Not notable. One of his films appears to have a very impressive list of awards (many for him) but none of them are major. Some are extremely minor. Has a ridiculous number of sources but there is a lack of good sources. Most are just listings. If no sources were found, just make some [16] [17] [18]. The is a lack of coverage about Playne. In the current version there is local interest puff piece [19] that has any depth of coverage about him. A search found none better. This is advertising from paid spammers. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to More popular than Jesus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 10:45, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I couldn't establish that this magazine meets WP:NOTABILITY. A WP:COI editor for a company named 'Datebook' has been edit warring to overwrite this, so prod was removed that way. The article should remain on the magazine, and then the dating company could be moved here if this is deleted. Boleyn ( talk) 12:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- Ed ( Edgar181) 13:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
WP:GNG Does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. There is a paucity of secondary sources that could contribute to an article about this person. User: LittleT889 ( User talk: LittleT889) 10:11, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
This needs to be more widely circulated - he seems notable in Peru, but I am not fluent in Spanish NealeFamily ( talk) 07:47, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Article is about an animator with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish general notability nor that for creative professionals. Whpq ( talk) 12:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Unotable former child star with only 2 roles (though I do find it amusing that she played a young Whoopi Goldberg in both of them) Wgolf ( talk) 00:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
WP:IMPORTANCE -- not notable, from an editorial sponsored by software-defined networking company, Brocade Communications Systems. nenolod ( talk) ( edits) 13:52, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Additional background is seen in the article it came from -- [20], there was no mention of "the new IP" in relation to networking until then, in fact, a google search for "the new IP" shows lots of listings about intellectual property; not networking. My conclusion is that it's just wiki spam, and should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nenolod ( talk • contribs) 13:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G5, blocked user creation. Ged UK 13:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Long song list with only unreliable sources-also kind of is a duplicate of the article that has a discography for this artist that I found. Wgolf ( talk) 16:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep-- Ymblanter ( talk) 06:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Article is an unsourced stub, not evidence of notability. Joseph2302 ( talk) 20:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Delete as proposer. Joseph2302 ( talk) 20:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)