< December 6 | December 8 > |
---|
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:37, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Record label that appears to fail the notability guideline for companies. After researching, I did not discover any reliable sources containing any information about the subject, nor did I find any sources at all that support the claims made in the article. Additionally, the user who created the article appears to have created another article on a record label, Da Kingdom Records, and after being deleted, recreated the page multiple times. – Alex43223 T | C | E 23:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable autobiography. The article was speedily deleted earlier today, but the subject restarted his article soon after. Google returns a minimal amount of hits (like less than 90). CyberGhostface ( talk) 23:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Zoids:_Genesis#Zoids. MBisanz talk 02:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Zoids:_Genesis#Zoids. MBisanz talk 02:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Zoids: Chaotic Century. MBisanz talk 02:41, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional locations does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
"Created to support the Community Equity Open Source project". Blatant original research / use of Wikipedia as a free host. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 23:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Zoids: Chaotic Century. MBisanz talk 02:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional locations does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This list of trivial fictional weapons does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Zoids: Genesis. MBisanz talk 02:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 22:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Cirt ( talk) 15:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Redundant and unnecessary content fork. Speedied and prodded once. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Cirt ( talk) 15:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable autobiography. I couldn't find much to support his claims, or anything about him really on the internet. Nothing showed up on Google for him. "Kari Shaka Thompson" only returns Wikipedia, and I searched for "Kari Shaka Thompson" and "Kari Thompson" along with "At World's End" to see if there was any truth to his claim that he had a starring role in the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie, but nothing on that end either. CyberGhostface ( talk) 22:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is not about the article title. Instead, it is about a theory in astrophysics that the subject has co-written. The author of this article has a troubled relationship with the community (see the user's talk page). Richard Cavell ( talk) 22:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete by Ohnoitsjamie. Lenticel ( talk) 23:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am proposing this article be deleted because it appears to fail the notability standard defined in Wikipedia:Notability (music). According to the article the musical ensemble in question has yet to even release an album; this appears to be a vanity article. When/If the group achieves notability the article can be re-created. Naufana : talk 21:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — neuro (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely non-notable and generally un-necessary as an article. Commercial. Technosenior ( talk) 20:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. G2, test page Mgm| (talk) 10:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This does not fall under any CSD. However, it ought to be deleted as the subject matter is not notable enough for inclusion. The subject appears to be a personality created by a person within a computer game. There is no indication that the fictional personality has any relevance outside the author's installation of the computer game, or that it has achieved notability. The achievements described for this fictional character appear only to have been achieved by the author of the article in the context of the computer game. Richard Cavell ( talk) 20:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This is almost an exact duplicate of The Mr. Men Show. I have no idea of the reasoning for the fork, since the show is the same in the USA as it is in the UK, with the only differences being voice actors and titles. The original The Mr. Men Show did indicate the differences, and I see no reason why it cannot continue to do so. Yngvarr (t) (c) 20:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete. I was just going to prod this. A complete duplication without any indication why a separate article is needed. --
Escape Orbit
(Talk)
20:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
Delete as unnecessary duplication. Wiw8 ( talk) 23:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete this article as differences between US and UK versions of the mr men show have since been erased from the parent article. Fruit.bmp ( talk) 10:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Of course the UK version is the original version, so if there was a split it should really take the primary namespace, but since theres not enough here to justify two articles it should be deleted the original article should be repaired. Artw ( talk) 00:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A non-notable minor villain. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 ( talk) 19:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. G3, WP:NFT Mgm| (talk) 10:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced nonsense. Hemlock Martinis ( talk) 19:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) PeterSymonds ( talk) 16:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This page sound like an advertisement or a catalogue. It only include a list of model numbers. This type of content is very unencyclopedic and it shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Fangfufu ( talk) 19:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that shows notability. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Schuym1 ( talk) 19:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) PeterSymonds ( talk) 21:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable Mickey Mouse short. A Google search for "When the cat's away""Mickey mouse" [8] returns only 1,030 results, the vast majority of which are from comprehensive websites like imdb or The Big Cartoon Database, blogs, or things unrelated to this film, and as such it appears to fail WP:NF. Unscented ( talk) 19:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The two guidelines being cited support the coexistence of such lists with categories. The people who voted to delete did not cite policy at all. Mgm| (talk) 10:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A list of lists. This is surely what categories exist for? Cordless Larry ( talk) 19:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced. Not sure if this is a real movie. Cssiitcic ( talk) 19:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as blatant vandalism. ... discospinster talk 19:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe this article is a possible hoax (maybe even an attack article on similarly named schools). After much Google searching, all I've been able to come up with is a St. Mungo's Academy in Glasgow, a St. Mungo's High School in Falkirk, and a St. Mungo's Primary School (and of course the fictional hospital). If there is such a school, I see verifiability issues due to the lack of information found. Nick— Contact/ Contribs 18:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( G12/ G11) by Gwen Gale. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk) 21:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Blatant advertising. Beagel ( talk) 18:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Apparent hoax? After translating the tiny article from spanish, I googled for the name and can't find anything for this supposed leader in the Ecuadorian revolution (see Ecuadorian War of Independence). I am guessing that this is the name of the author (username begins with Adrian), who is perhaps pretty young judging by the spanish spelling mistakes. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — neuro (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Apparently non-notable film festival. A Google news archive search turned up nothing of substance, just trivial references, "the festival is occuring"-type announcements, and press releases. There have been complaints against the festival, but I would argue that not even the complaining makes it notable. Precious Roy ( talk) 18:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Secret account 15:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced article about a non notable evangelist. I find no evidence to support this article remaining. Paste Talk 21:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Paste Talk 21:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
: Alexander Marshall, Gospel Hall Pioneer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) :and duplicated article - Alexander Marshall ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
COMMENT – This is not treading on toes – this against procedure. First, you submit an additional article 4 days after the original nomination was posted. Remember, a AFD is usually only posted for 5 days. Hence, you are only giving the community 1 day to respond. NO! Second, it is about a separate individual. As it is about a separate individual – a separate article and the only tie in is that it mentions J.J. Rouse, how do you come to the conclusion that they should be reviewed in the same AFD? Also, have you considered the earlier opinion expressed, before you submitted this piece? Do you judge their responses for both articles? Or just the first? ShoesssS Talk 15:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
What makes an evangelist "notable"? This particular evangelist helped to establish Gospel Hall assemblies in Canada. I'm not trying to be contrary... but what criteria are you looking for? Does he need to have established churches in a larger denomination? Sayworth
Sayworth ( talk) 19:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I have to admit, it's a poorly written article. I would prefer it to be more scholarly and relevant. For lack of time, I'm unable to complete or fix it at the moment. I personally hope someone who is more of a historian is able to complete it, and make it more relevant and notable -- hopefully someone without the bias I have referred to here and elsewhere. If, the article is NOT deleted do these comments here become part of the discussion page of the actual article? I don't know how this works, but I think it could be beneficial to keep the comments intact, and accessible from the original article. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sayworth (
talk •
contribs)
15:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Speedy delete G12. Black Kite 17:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Does this organization meet the notability criteria? My search on google news didn't reveal many reliable sources writing about it, and those that I did find didn't seem to confirm the group's importance- in fact, they seemed to be about several different organizations that have the same name. The article itself also lacks independent sources, so I can't confirm notability that way. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 17:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete (A3/A7). Black Kite 18:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No claim in article of meeting WP:Notability; gsearch not turning up notability (or even existence.) Prod contested without comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. MBisanz talk 04:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A duplicate of Surveillance and Incarceration in the U.S., Russia, and China (currently on AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surveillance and Incarceration in the U.S., Russia, and China, created by a probably sockpuppet of blocked user Kikbguy (case here). Consists of almost the exact same text and information as the other AfD'ed article, only with a single sentence and ref about military spending added; this extra information doesn't increase the notability or verifiability of the claims in this article, but only increases the amount of unpublished synthesis; like the original article, this is an arbitrary cross-categorization and collection of statistics with no assertion of a relationship between them. Article was declined for speedy until other AfD is closed, and prod was removed. — Politizer talk/ contribs 17:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The information in this article already exists in the Rockferry article. It is redundant and unnecessary for it to have its own article, the deluxe edition in and of itself is not notable outside of the context of the original album, and this article adds no new information which needs to be merged. Scapler ( talk) 16:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The website doesn't seem to have much notability other than the fact that its just a forum with a fanatical userbase. The site doesn't rank that highly in Alexa compared to more professional English sites like 1UP, IGN, and GameSpot. So I don't know why this article this even exists. Jonny2x4 ( talk) 16:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy close. Don't do this, please. The IWF is a clearly notable organisation, and regardless of how you feel about the current issue, this is not the way to go about protesting about it. Black Kite 16:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Promotional, Waste of Space, Putting censorship controversy aside it lacks grounds for inclusion «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 16:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to The Wedding (band). MBisanz talk 02:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:MUSIC. roux 14:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to facility management. MBisanz talk 02:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This appears to be part of an emerging linkfarm nest connected with the speedied Alexi Marmot Associates created by User:Oseland. I'm not insisting on outright deletion, maybe it is salvageable. Please also review the the self-referencing Post occupancy evaluation by the same user. - NVO ( talk) 20:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Please advise on how this article can be salvaged. Workplace Consulting is a recognised discipline within the UK and an omission from Wikipedia. Oseland ( talk) 21:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I have teaken the refreences out to Alexi Marmot Associates on the Workplace consulting and Post occupancy evaluation articles. As above POE is a clear omission from Wikipedia. Please delete the offending lines rather than the articles. I have seen articles on other archtectural practices so assumed some reference was okay. Oseland ( talk) 21:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Suggest that Beatty Point be merged into this article or nominated separately ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 02:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable bay. Nothing of importance has happened here, and the most interesting thing according to the article is "bird watching." -- Seascic T/ C 21:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related page: reply
That's what I found in the first few hits. It looks there's more info to be found. - Mgm| (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Was nominated for prod, but tag was removed. Not sure if it falls under any speedy deletion criteria, so I'm nominating it for AfD. I have no opinion on whether it should be kept or deleted. Hermione 1980 15:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_The_X_Factor_finalists_(UK_series_5)#Alexandra_Burke with no predudice against reversion if there's a consensus for it ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Finalists in reality shows are not generally considered notable until they have done something outside the show. However, Burke's case is not as clear-cut, as she has now taken part in two series. However, I still feel that she is not, at this time, notable enough to warrant an article. J Milburn ( talk) 15:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Alexandra is hot fave to win at the bookies and is most likely to win, making her very notable and most likely have a second number-one single. The final 3 usually get recording contracts anyway which means she will become a professional singer. So whats the point of deleting my hard work to make a really good and well organized wikipage to have it come back on in a few months time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codywarren08 ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — neuro (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Subject not notable. Looks autobiographical. Graymornings ( talk) 14:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Hermione 1980 16:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC) speedy delete, see longer explanation below. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Disputed PROD: "no evidence this album exists, but I may have missed something. If it does exist then keep the article, the singer is more than notable. It was supposed to be released "in early 2008" according to some sources." If reliable sources indicate this album exists, the article should be updated and this AFD speedy-closed as "keep." Note: Coincidently, the original author is blocked until January. Note: I will put a note on the talk page of the artist, Talk:Michelle McManus. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Different Beat davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Hermione 1980 16:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
speedy delete, see longer explanation below. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Disputed PROD. PROD reason was: "no evidence this album exists, but I may have missed something. If it does exist then keep the article, the singer is more than notable. It was supposed to be released "in early 2008" according to some sources." PROD removed by the original editor, who coincidently is blocked until early January. I am requesting that this be deleted without prejudice for re-creation of a sourced article about this song. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Update: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing To A Different Beat. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 15:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Note: I will post an announcement of this on Talk:Michelle McManus in the hopes of finding sources.
The result was speedy delete. Hermione 1980 16:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Who is the subject? I don't think that he is notable enough. Alexius08 ( talk) 14:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable actress fails WP:BIO. Valrith ( talk) 14:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 18:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced and without sufficient context. The text only mentions a region, but not a specific location. No time of year is given, which seems crucial for an annual event. No assertion, let alone documentation of notability (while I expect that one or several such festivals actually do exist, they could very well be minor events of only local relevance). The original purpose of the article apparently was as a link container for travel business linkspam, and nothing other than basic wikifikation has been added to it since then. -- Latebird ( talk) 14:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
It's a function hall. Much like many thousands of similar structures. The sources provided don't appear to show that this function hall has any particular notability; the cited newspaper article turns out to be merely an announcement of an event being held there. In my opinion, this is not a notable subject. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 13:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Project Runway (season 4). MBisanz talk 02:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
In the past, the community has decided that appearing on a reality show did not, in itself, indicate that a person was notable. This person appears to be known only for her appearance on Project Runway, and the article lacks reliable independent sources showing that she is significant beyond that appearance. Do we think she is a notable person? FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 13:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I'm deleting this because the other page Levski in Europe is complete (this one isn't). Mgm| (talk) 11:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Not worthy of a separate article Ban Ray 13:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, blanked by creator. ... discospinster talk 00:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Doesn't seem to be notable. Could not find any significant news articles or press on Herwig. Graymornings ( talk) 12:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No evidence that this book is notbale. It got two newspaper mentions (in the same paper, on the same day, about 2 weeks ago on 23-Nov-2008) [18] [19], and a briefer mention in The Australian back on 1-Nov-2008 [20] but my opinion is that being merely being reviewed in one or two newspaper reviews does not make a book notable. Peter Ballard ( talk) 11:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am disputing the references given as evidence of the book's notability:
(I'm not 100% convinced that these references even count as reliable sources)
I have yet to see any reference that makes this book stand out from the crowd. The coverage is the same as you would expect for any book that was recently published ie. a few book reviews and a few interviews with the author(s).
Things I'd like to see:
-- Surturz ( talk) 01:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 18:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Subject not notable. Article sounds somewhat like an advertisement. Graymornings ( talk) 11:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A unreferenced list of playable and non playable characters of Super Robot Wars. Banpresto Originals was deleted and it was written that "This doesn't seem to be an official term used to differentiate this series from the rest of the Super Robot Wars series". Check Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banpresto Originals. Moreover, all article characters were deleted. Magioladitis ( talk) 10:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating this:
The result was Speedy delete a7, no credible assertion of notability, only source is subject's MySpace page. NawlinWiki ( talk) 13:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This person may not be as 'famed' as the article claims, to the point where the article may be considered a hoax. The article appears to be written by its subject, creating a conflict of interest. Richard Cavell ( talk) 10:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted clear advertising multiple copies both salted Gnan garra 12:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Even though this organization exists for a purportedly noble cause, this article reads as an advertisement. In particular, it does not draw from secondary sources. The two nominated articles are identical except for the presence or absence of a space in the title. Richard Cavell ( talk) 10:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. An article on a non notable post graduate program. The article offers no independent sources and there appear to be them. Wikipedia is not a webhost, prospectus nor advertising site. Nuttah ( talk) 09:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. An article on a non notable covers band which makes no claim to meeting WP:BAND. A search returns no reliable sources Nuttah ( talk) 09:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Deleted by Orangemike ( talk · contribs). Mgm| (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article may exist primarily to promote a particular company. The company may also not have achieved sufficient notability for inclusion. Richard Cavell ( talk) 08:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable actor. The majority of the "independent" and "short" films cannot be verified, the role of "Nerdy Boy" in the unreleased Frankie Muniz film, My Sexiest, is far down the credit list, and the only other film role that can be verified is also far down the credit list. When you eliminate the extraneous uses of his name, his self-promotional YouTube videos and the Wikipedia article, it leaves 24 Google hits, some of which aren't this person. Oh, and did I mention that he created his own article? His notability has not been established. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 07:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. Album track only, never released as a single. Article has been flagged for lack of references for over a year with no improvement, suggesting none are to be found Paul75 ( talk) 06:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article may constitute a failed attempt to promote a particular product/website (there is no {{reflist}} to generate the intended hyperlink). The article is written in corporate newspeak, making it inaccessible to a lay audience and not able to be generalised for the purposes of a general-interest encyclopedia. Richard Cavell ( talk) 06:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. Never released as a single, album track only. Unreferenced. Paul75 ( talk) 06:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Autobiography of non-notable actor. No IMDB entry. No valid references. Gogo Dodo ( talk) 06:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. Album track only, never released as a single. Unreferenced and OR. Paul75 ( talk) 06:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to True Blue (album). MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. US Promo release only. Never charted. Unreferenced Paul75 ( talk) 06:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to True Blue (album). MBisanz talk 02:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. Song is an album track only, has never been released as a single and has only ever been performed once. What scant (unreferenced) information there is can easily be included in the parent album's article Paul75 ( talk) 06:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete under criterion A7. Enigma message 07:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability. Author keeps deleting speedy tags, and deleted prod tag. — Jeff G. ( talk| contribs) 06:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (films), as shooting has not yet begun. Sources in article are mostly about the stars, with the film being a passing mention. Prod contested by IP editor without comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 06:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. (Non-admin closure) ApprenticeFan ( talk) 10:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This was a boxing match this past night that has no real lasting value. While it involved notable fighters, it in and of itself was rather unremarkable: it was not even for a title.
Keeping a boxing match like this would be like keeping an article for the 2007 Indianapolis-New England regular season NFL game - yeah the teams were good but the game had no lasting value. -- CastAStone //₵₳$↑₳ ₴₮ʘ№€ 05:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Kept. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article does not appear to meet the requirements of WP:N. I would like further opinions regarding this. Also, as per the text present in the Career section, it is clear the creator of this article is also the subject of this article, and therefore is prone to WP:COI(note the use of first-person word I in the last sentence in the Career section). — Dæ dαlus Contribs / Improve 11:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki ( talk) 05:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Nn-notable company Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Site does not appear to pass WP:WEB. Article is written entirely from the primary source. Few wiki links (tagged since last year). Pcap ping 10:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete.
MBisanz
talk
02:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
This article has gone a year without any credible sources and isn't very encyclopediac anyway. Looks like Japanese pop-culture-cruft. RobertM525 ( talk) 03:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NM, non-notable person with lack of third-party reliable sources. Diverse Mentality 20:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Can't believe i am editing this for the first time since 2008! Am I the only one who heard his song in 9 years?! by mistake of course
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe the company fails notability - it is a retail company with a website, and I cannot find anything that could be added to the article without it turning into an advert. Putney Bridge ( talk) 00:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, A7; notability not even asserted. While the article was admittedly a masterpiece, when the issue is one of notability it doesn't matter. Author blocked as a spam-only account. Blueboy 96 05:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Promotional. No claims of notability. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 04:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Not sure what you mean? What makes other web applications "notable"? Do I need to include mashable, ZDNet or PRWeek articles to justify our legitimacy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitchengine ( talk • contribs) 05:05, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article doesn't meet
notability requirements for albums. I can't find any sources as to charting, or any coverage at all about the album, in order to give it more than a track list. Given that "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting", I tried a redirect to the artist's article,
Richie Rich (rapper), but that was reverted. So I'm bringing it here for further discussion as to whether it is notable enough for an article.
Raven1977 (
talk)
04:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
I am also nominating two additional albums by the same artist, for the same reasons of lacking notability and no sources found to provide notability:
All Right Simply Put It Those Albums Did'nt Chart Man Those Albums Werent Popular Richie Rich Isnt That Popular Anymore
Ok
Well Heres Some Links Man from very reliable sources
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Richie+Rich+(2)
http://www.discogs.com/release/1007292
http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/richie_rich/artist.jhtml
http://www.mtv.com/music/artist/richie_rich/albums.jhtml?albumId=736461
http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/richie_rich/736461/album.jhtml
http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/richie_rich/albums.jhtml
http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/richie_rich/239017/album.jhtml
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:acfwxqykldae
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:dvftxqukldae
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0jfyxq80ldje
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hcfoxqraldje —Preceding unsigned comment added by The4's ( talk • contribs) 08:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Cirt ( talk) 15:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
according to multiple WP:RS, "Maal literally mean Property". Not a mythical creature, as this Article purports. Unless there is a translation error, I believe this Article should be Deleted Exit2DOS2000• T• C• 04:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn - meets WP:PROF ~ my error. ZimZalaBim talk 14:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:BIO. ZimZalaBim talk 04:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Filipino martial arts. MBisanz talk 02:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This stub fails WP:NOTE and could possibly be a hoax as well. - MBK 004 04:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Likely non-notable company founder. Company does exist, however. Opening for discussion. Master&Expert ( Talk) 03:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Cirt ( talk) 15:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe that this article is unsuitable for inclusion. It is unclear to me for what purpose this article exists. This article may exist to promote the website www.galleryofpearls.com. It may otherwise be an essay, or someone's opinion, that has not achieved widespread acceptance. Richard Cavell ( talk) 02:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PORNBIO with only a nomination with an ensemble of 10 actors. Twice deleted for not showing notability, including as Lexi Marie. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-07 t02:48z 02:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Professional wrestling holds#Elevated double chickenwing. ( non-admin closure) PeterSymonds ( talk) 16:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable wrestling move. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 02:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Despite claims to the contrary simply being picked in the draft does not make this person notable and therefore he appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 12:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
American actor with no notable roles. The clearly auto-generated three-sentence stub claims he appeared in 24 films, but counts appearances on television shows. No sources other than IMDB, nor even the slightest claim of notability: essentially, a re-purposed IMDB entry of no encyclopaedic value. CalendarWatcher ( talk) 22:45, 26 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Despite claims to the contrary simply being picked in the draft does not make this person notable and therefore he appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Despite claims to the contrary simply being picked in the draft does not make this person notable and therefore he appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I created this article about a local news woman in Florida working for Central Florida News 13 as I felt it would be a good idea. However, I'm now beggining to think that this article does not need to be on Wikipedia due to the fact that Crabtree is only local and not national. What do you think?
Before I end what I have to say, I feel the below article on a local weather anchor in Chicago which I also created an article about faces the same issues that Melissa Crabtree faces:
— Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 02:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There have been numerous sources that prove the groups exist and have data published about them, but the trivial intersection issue was not addressed. Mgm| (talk) 11:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. Cordless Larry ( talk) 22:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of Firefox extensions. MBisanz talk 02:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article about a Firefox extension that makes no claim of notability and is unsourced. A {{ prod}} was removed by creator without comment. ZimZalaBim talk 02:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. nomination withdrawn. Mgm| (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Finished unfinished nom for OneCyclone. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted as copyvio from http://www.tajhotels.com/abouttaj/companyinformation/HistoryOfTaj.htm .
I'm suggesting this page be merged with Taj Hotel, but would like community consensus before doing so. I don't know if I'm supposed to post a merge suggestion here or elsewhere. My apologies in advance for that. ~Beano~ (talk) (contribs) 01:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep per withdrawal of nomination with no "delete" opinions registered. Non-admin closure. Deor ( talk) 01:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
While I am sure that Kentucky Route 915 is a fine place to travel, live, and such, but it is just one more road in the US. I don't think Wikipedia needs an article for each interesting road in the world. I don't feel strongly about this, so this is a "weak delete". sinneed ( talk) 01:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article may be too speculative for inclusion in wikipedia. I cannot find any evidence of a new generation on the Bakugan website. A Google search reveals one link - [45] - which is a post from a forum. The New Generation may represent wishful thinking, or fan fiction. In any case, it is unverifiable.
The article's author has also added some info to the Bakugan Battle Brawlers article. If the closing admin decides to delete, I suggest that the addition to the main BBB article also be undone. Richard Cavell ( talk) 01:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
To change the subject there also also sites mentioning an unrelated new season of Bakugan under a different name BAKUGAN: NEW VESTROIA and barring an elaborate hoax the sources for this one are more numerous and appear to be more reliable than sources for the fan fic in question. [ [46]] [ [47]]. The google serach in question was [ [48]] if someone wants to look at the rest of the sources. In short if any are of the two are real it is more likely new vestoria. -- 76.71.208.23 ( talk) 00:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Completing nomination for IP. Reason on edit summary was:
I abstain. MrKIA11 ( talk) 19:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is not built from independent, reliable sources (WP:V), and does not explain how it meets the notability guidelines (WP:Bio) - level of activity is not an indication of notability. Oo7565 ( talk) 17:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4. Ice Cold Beer ( talk) 05:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Repost, but may not qualify for a G4 (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Leave Me in Love). Album has no professional reviews, only sources are a fansite and last.fm, both very unreliable. Dierks is notable without a doubt, but there's nothing about this album. Seriously. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No content, no references, just a dicdef & list `' Míkka >t 03:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
fails WP:CREATIVE. simply being a radio presenter is not necessarily notable. Very limited third party coverage in Google news search. Michellecrisp ( talk) 05:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article describes a future product that is not yet complete. It is unclear whether the product is a computer game, a demo, or a social networking utility. It is unclear whether it will be commercial or free. The product does not appear to have acquired notability. Richard Cavell ( talk) 06:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The article, orphaned since September 2006, fails to indicate the notability and importance of this trust fund set up in 1893. Ohconfucius ( talk) 06:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Completely non-notable organization, all references are in passing, plagued with original research issues, lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme ( talk) 07:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A youth player who hasn't played an official match for Ajax and afaict hasn't played an official match for Odense either. Aecis·(away) talk 09:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable single--failed to chart. roux 12:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 01:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local grocery stores. roux 14:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable sandwich. Already covered in Primanti Brothers. Contested prod. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 15:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
If the other sandwiches from the "sandwiches" article deserve their own pages, then so does the Pitts-burgher. It's as simple as that. And yes, it's called the Pitts-burgher. Here's the proof: http://www.primantibrothers.com/menu/city/strip/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keyboardplaya ( talk • contribs) 04:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirecting The Bagatelle Card Club → The Adventure of the Empty House, and The Tankerville Club → The Five Orange Pips. keep Killer Evans. - Mgm| (talk) 11:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely non-notable and generally un-necessary as an article. The subjects have no significance to anything. ╟─ Treasury Tag► contribs─╢ 18:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to One Life to Live children#Jack Manning. I've deleted the page as the concensus seems to say, but redirected in my capacity as an editor because Richard's idea seemed logical. Mgm| (talk) 08:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable child actor with only a single minor role (probably non-speaking) to his credit. — TAnthony Talk 21:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mgm| (talk) 08:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails
WP:BIO,
WP:MUSIC. The only coverage I can find is the reference mentioned in the short interview in
The New York Magazine "look book", which is far from significant coverage.
I redirected Kautz' band
Electric Tickle Machine article to his biography, thinking that Kautz was notable at that point. The band fails
WP:MUSIC though, too, with only
one additional name drop (in Welsh).
Amalthea
22:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. Kesac ( talk) 16:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article has been deleted after an AfD before and was re-created within 5 hours of the closure of that AfD. Subsequent speedy (G4) was declined, because the album had been released since the previous AfD. A prod with reason "article on an album without any reliable independent sources. Article consists of little more than track listing, with links to promotional websites" was declined with stated reason "sources ARE reliable" (they may be, but they are not independent). In the more than 2 months that have passed since, no sources indicating notability for this album have been forthcoming. A Google search results in some track-listings, some websites where the album can be bought (or downloaded using torrents), and the website of the artist himself. Given the lack of reliable third-party sources: delete. -- Crusio ( talk) 00:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced BLP, does not appear to be a notable artist, possibly even a hoax: I can't find any Google hits about him. Most Google hits appear to be about a musician of the same name, or match the German words Kasper weiß ("Caspar knows"). Sandstein 21:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply
< December 6 | December 8 > |
---|
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:37, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Record label that appears to fail the notability guideline for companies. After researching, I did not discover any reliable sources containing any information about the subject, nor did I find any sources at all that support the claims made in the article. Additionally, the user who created the article appears to have created another article on a record label, Da Kingdom Records, and after being deleted, recreated the page multiple times. – Alex43223 T | C | E 23:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:38, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable autobiography. The article was speedily deleted earlier today, but the subject restarted his article soon after. Google returns a minimal amount of hits (like less than 90). CyberGhostface ( talk) 23:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Zoids:_Genesis#Zoids. MBisanz talk 02:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Zoids:_Genesis#Zoids. MBisanz talk 02:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Zoids: Chaotic Century. MBisanz talk 02:41, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional locations does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:34, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
"Created to support the Community Equity Open Source project". Blatant original research / use of Wikipedia as a free host. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 23:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Zoids: Chaotic Century. MBisanz talk 02:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional locations does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This list of trivial fictional weapons does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 23:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Zoids: Genesis. MBisanz talk 02:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN ( talk) 22:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Cirt ( talk) 15:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Redundant and unnecessary content fork. Speedied and prodded once. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Cirt ( talk) 15:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable autobiography. I couldn't find much to support his claims, or anything about him really on the internet. Nothing showed up on Google for him. "Kari Shaka Thompson" only returns Wikipedia, and I searched for "Kari Shaka Thompson" and "Kari Thompson" along with "At World's End" to see if there was any truth to his claim that he had a starring role in the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie, but nothing on that end either. CyberGhostface ( talk) 22:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is not about the article title. Instead, it is about a theory in astrophysics that the subject has co-written. The author of this article has a troubled relationship with the community (see the user's talk page). Richard Cavell ( talk) 22:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete by Ohnoitsjamie. Lenticel ( talk) 23:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am proposing this article be deleted because it appears to fail the notability standard defined in Wikipedia:Notability (music). According to the article the musical ensemble in question has yet to even release an album; this appears to be a vanity article. When/If the group achieves notability the article can be re-created. Naufana : talk 21:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — neuro (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely non-notable and generally un-necessary as an article. Commercial. Technosenior ( talk) 20:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. G2, test page Mgm| (talk) 10:37, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This does not fall under any CSD. However, it ought to be deleted as the subject matter is not notable enough for inclusion. The subject appears to be a personality created by a person within a computer game. There is no indication that the fictional personality has any relevance outside the author's installation of the computer game, or that it has achieved notability. The achievements described for this fictional character appear only to have been achieved by the author of the article in the context of the computer game. Richard Cavell ( talk) 20:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This is almost an exact duplicate of The Mr. Men Show. I have no idea of the reasoning for the fork, since the show is the same in the USA as it is in the UK, with the only differences being voice actors and titles. The original The Mr. Men Show did indicate the differences, and I see no reason why it cannot continue to do so. Yngvarr (t) (c) 20:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete. I was just going to prod this. A complete duplication without any indication why a separate article is needed. --
Escape Orbit
(Talk)
20:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
Delete as unnecessary duplication. Wiw8 ( talk) 23:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete this article as differences between US and UK versions of the mr men show have since been erased from the parent article. Fruit.bmp ( talk) 10:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Of course the UK version is the original version, so if there was a split it should really take the primary namespace, but since theres not enough here to justify two articles it should be deleted the original article should be repaired. Artw ( talk) 00:36, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A non-notable minor villain. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 ( talk) 19:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. G3, WP:NFT Mgm| (talk) 10:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced nonsense. Hemlock Martinis ( talk) 19:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. ( non-admin closure) PeterSymonds ( talk) 16:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This page sound like an advertisement or a catalogue. It only include a list of model numbers. This type of content is very unencyclopedic and it shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Fangfufu ( talk) 19:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I can't find any reliable sources that shows notability. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Schuym1 ( talk) 19:40, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) PeterSymonds ( talk) 21:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable Mickey Mouse short. A Google search for "When the cat's away""Mickey mouse" [8] returns only 1,030 results, the vast majority of which are from comprehensive websites like imdb or The Big Cartoon Database, blogs, or things unrelated to this film, and as such it appears to fail WP:NF. Unscented ( talk) 19:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. The two guidelines being cited support the coexistence of such lists with categories. The people who voted to delete did not cite policy at all. Mgm| (talk) 10:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A list of lists. This is surely what categories exist for? Cordless Larry ( talk) 19:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced. Not sure if this is a real movie. Cssiitcic ( talk) 19:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as blatant vandalism. ... discospinster talk 19:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe this article is a possible hoax (maybe even an attack article on similarly named schools). After much Google searching, all I've been able to come up with is a St. Mungo's Academy in Glasgow, a St. Mungo's High School in Falkirk, and a St. Mungo's Primary School (and of course the fictional hospital). If there is such a school, I see verifiability issues due to the lack of information found. Nick— Contact/ Contribs 18:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( G12/ G11) by Gwen Gale. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk) 21:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Blatant advertising. Beagel ( talk) 18:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Apparent hoax? After translating the tiny article from spanish, I googled for the name and can't find anything for this supposed leader in the Ecuadorian revolution (see Ecuadorian War of Independence). I am guessing that this is the name of the author (username begins with Adrian), who is perhaps pretty young judging by the spanish spelling mistakes. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — neuro (talk) 20:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Apparently non-notable film festival. A Google news archive search turned up nothing of substance, just trivial references, "the festival is occuring"-type announcements, and press releases. There have been complaints against the festival, but I would argue that not even the complaining makes it notable. Precious Roy ( talk) 18:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Secret account 15:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced article about a non notable evangelist. I find no evidence to support this article remaining. Paste Talk 21:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC) Paste Talk 21:33, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
: Alexander Marshall, Gospel Hall Pioneer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) :and duplicated article - Alexander Marshall ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
COMMENT – This is not treading on toes – this against procedure. First, you submit an additional article 4 days after the original nomination was posted. Remember, a AFD is usually only posted for 5 days. Hence, you are only giving the community 1 day to respond. NO! Second, it is about a separate individual. As it is about a separate individual – a separate article and the only tie in is that it mentions J.J. Rouse, how do you come to the conclusion that they should be reviewed in the same AFD? Also, have you considered the earlier opinion expressed, before you submitted this piece? Do you judge their responses for both articles? Or just the first? ShoesssS Talk 15:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
What makes an evangelist "notable"? This particular evangelist helped to establish Gospel Hall assemblies in Canada. I'm not trying to be contrary... but what criteria are you looking for? Does he need to have established churches in a larger denomination? Sayworth
Sayworth ( talk) 19:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I have to admit, it's a poorly written article. I would prefer it to be more scholarly and relevant. For lack of time, I'm unable to complete or fix it at the moment. I personally hope someone who is more of a historian is able to complete it, and make it more relevant and notable -- hopefully someone without the bias I have referred to here and elsewhere. If, the article is NOT deleted do these comments here become part of the discussion page of the actual article? I don't know how this works, but I think it could be beneficial to keep the comments intact, and accessible from the original article. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Sayworth (
talk •
contribs)
15:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Speedy delete G12. Black Kite 17:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Does this organization meet the notability criteria? My search on google news didn't reveal many reliable sources writing about it, and those that I did find didn't seem to confirm the group's importance- in fact, they seemed to be about several different organizations that have the same name. The article itself also lacks independent sources, so I can't confirm notability that way. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 17:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete (A3/A7). Black Kite 18:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No claim in article of meeting WP:Notability; gsearch not turning up notability (or even existence.) Prod contested without comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. MBisanz talk 04:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A duplicate of Surveillance and Incarceration in the U.S., Russia, and China (currently on AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surveillance and Incarceration in the U.S., Russia, and China, created by a probably sockpuppet of blocked user Kikbguy (case here). Consists of almost the exact same text and information as the other AfD'ed article, only with a single sentence and ref about military spending added; this extra information doesn't increase the notability or verifiability of the claims in this article, but only increases the amount of unpublished synthesis; like the original article, this is an arbitrary cross-categorization and collection of statistics with no assertion of a relationship between them. Article was declined for speedy until other AfD is closed, and prod was removed. — Politizer talk/ contribs 17:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The information in this article already exists in the Rockferry article. It is redundant and unnecessary for it to have its own article, the deluxe edition in and of itself is not notable outside of the context of the original album, and this article adds no new information which needs to be merged. Scapler ( talk) 16:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The website doesn't seem to have much notability other than the fact that its just a forum with a fanatical userbase. The site doesn't rank that highly in Alexa compared to more professional English sites like 1UP, IGN, and GameSpot. So I don't know why this article this even exists. Jonny2x4 ( talk) 16:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy close. Don't do this, please. The IWF is a clearly notable organisation, and regardless of how you feel about the current issue, this is not the way to go about protesting about it. Black Kite 16:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Promotional, Waste of Space, Putting censorship controversy aside it lacks grounds for inclusion «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 16:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to The Wedding (band). MBisanz talk 02:52, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:MUSIC. roux 14:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to facility management. MBisanz talk 02:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This appears to be part of an emerging linkfarm nest connected with the speedied Alexi Marmot Associates created by User:Oseland. I'm not insisting on outright deletion, maybe it is salvageable. Please also review the the self-referencing Post occupancy evaluation by the same user. - NVO ( talk) 20:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Please advise on how this article can be salvaged. Workplace Consulting is a recognised discipline within the UK and an omission from Wikipedia. Oseland ( talk) 21:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I have teaken the refreences out to Alexi Marmot Associates on the Workplace consulting and Post occupancy evaluation articles. As above POE is a clear omission from Wikipedia. Please delete the offending lines rather than the articles. I have seen articles on other archtectural practices so assumed some reference was okay. Oseland ( talk) 21:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Suggest that Beatty Point be merged into this article or nominated separately ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 02:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable bay. Nothing of importance has happened here, and the most interesting thing according to the article is "bird watching." -- Seascic T/ C 21:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related page: reply
That's what I found in the first few hits. It looks there's more info to be found. - Mgm| (talk) 22:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Was nominated for prod, but tag was removed. Not sure if it falls under any speedy deletion criteria, so I'm nominating it for AfD. I have no opinion on whether it should be kept or deleted. Hermione 1980 15:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to List_of_The_X_Factor_finalists_(UK_series_5)#Alexandra_Burke with no predudice against reversion if there's a consensus for it ( non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Finalists in reality shows are not generally considered notable until they have done something outside the show. However, Burke's case is not as clear-cut, as she has now taken part in two series. However, I still feel that she is not, at this time, notable enough to warrant an article. J Milburn ( talk) 15:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Alexandra is hot fave to win at the bookies and is most likely to win, making her very notable and most likely have a second number-one single. The final 3 usually get recording contracts anyway which means she will become a professional singer. So whats the point of deleting my hard work to make a really good and well organized wikipage to have it come back on in a few months time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codywarren08 ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) — neuro (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Subject not notable. Looks autobiographical. Graymornings ( talk) 14:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Hermione 1980 16:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC) speedy delete, see longer explanation below. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Disputed PROD: "no evidence this album exists, but I may have missed something. If it does exist then keep the article, the singer is more than notable. It was supposed to be released "in early 2008" according to some sources." If reliable sources indicate this album exists, the article should be updated and this AFD speedy-closed as "keep." Note: Coincidently, the original author is blocked until January. Note: I will put a note on the talk page of the artist, Talk:Michelle McManus. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Different Beat davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Hermione 1980 16:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
speedy delete, see longer explanation below. — C.Fred ( talk) 16:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Disputed PROD. PROD reason was: "no evidence this album exists, but I may have missed something. If it does exist then keep the article, the singer is more than notable. It was supposed to be released "in early 2008" according to some sources." PROD removed by the original editor, who coincidently is blocked until early January. I am requesting that this be deleted without prejudice for re-creation of a sourced article about this song. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 14:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC) Update: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing To A Different Beat. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 15:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Note: I will post an announcement of this on Talk:Michelle McManus in the hopes of finding sources.
The result was speedy delete. Hermione 1980 16:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Who is the subject? I don't think that he is notable enough. Alexius08 ( talk) 14:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable actress fails WP:BIO. Valrith ( talk) 14:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 18:06, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced and without sufficient context. The text only mentions a region, but not a specific location. No time of year is given, which seems crucial for an annual event. No assertion, let alone documentation of notability (while I expect that one or several such festivals actually do exist, they could very well be minor events of only local relevance). The original purpose of the article apparently was as a link container for travel business linkspam, and nothing other than basic wikifikation has been added to it since then. -- Latebird ( talk) 14:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
It's a function hall. Much like many thousands of similar structures. The sources provided don't appear to show that this function hall has any particular notability; the cited newspaper article turns out to be merely an announcement of an event being held there. In my opinion, this is not a notable subject. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 13:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Project Runway (season 4). MBisanz talk 02:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
In the past, the community has decided that appearing on a reality show did not, in itself, indicate that a person was notable. This person appears to be known only for her appearance on Project Runway, and the article lacks reliable independent sources showing that she is significant beyond that appearance. Do we think she is a notable person? FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 13:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I'm deleting this because the other page Levski in Europe is complete (this one isn't). Mgm| (talk) 11:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Not worthy of a separate article Ban Ray 13:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, blanked by creator. ... discospinster talk 00:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Doesn't seem to be notable. Could not find any significant news articles or press on Herwig. Graymornings ( talk) 12:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No evidence that this book is notbale. It got two newspaper mentions (in the same paper, on the same day, about 2 weeks ago on 23-Nov-2008) [18] [19], and a briefer mention in The Australian back on 1-Nov-2008 [20] but my opinion is that being merely being reviewed in one or two newspaper reviews does not make a book notable. Peter Ballard ( talk) 11:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am disputing the references given as evidence of the book's notability:
(I'm not 100% convinced that these references even count as reliable sources)
I have yet to see any reference that makes this book stand out from the crowd. The coverage is the same as you would expect for any book that was recently published ie. a few book reviews and a few interviews with the author(s).
Things I'd like to see:
-- Surturz ( talk) 01:21, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 18:08, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Subject not notable. Article sounds somewhat like an advertisement. Graymornings ( talk) 11:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A unreferenced list of playable and non playable characters of Super Robot Wars. Banpresto Originals was deleted and it was written that "This doesn't seem to be an official term used to differentiate this series from the rest of the Super Robot Wars series". Check Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banpresto Originals. Moreover, all article characters were deleted. Magioladitis ( talk) 10:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating this:
The result was Speedy delete a7, no credible assertion of notability, only source is subject's MySpace page. NawlinWiki ( talk) 13:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This person may not be as 'famed' as the article claims, to the point where the article may be considered a hoax. The article appears to be written by its subject, creating a conflict of interest. Richard Cavell ( talk) 10:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Deleted clear advertising multiple copies both salted Gnan garra 12:14, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Even though this organization exists for a purportedly noble cause, this article reads as an advertisement. In particular, it does not draw from secondary sources. The two nominated articles are identical except for the presence or absence of a space in the title. Richard Cavell ( talk) 10:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. An article on a non notable post graduate program. The article offers no independent sources and there appear to be them. Wikipedia is not a webhost, prospectus nor advertising site. Nuttah ( talk) 09:19, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. An article on a non notable covers band which makes no claim to meeting WP:BAND. A search returns no reliable sources Nuttah ( talk) 09:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Deleted by Orangemike ( talk · contribs). Mgm| (talk) 09:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article may exist primarily to promote a particular company. The company may also not have achieved sufficient notability for inclusion. Richard Cavell ( talk) 08:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable actor. The majority of the "independent" and "short" films cannot be verified, the role of "Nerdy Boy" in the unreleased Frankie Muniz film, My Sexiest, is far down the credit list, and the only other film role that can be verified is also far down the credit list. When you eliminate the extraneous uses of his name, his self-promotional YouTube videos and the Wikipedia article, it leaves 24 Google hits, some of which aren't this person. Oh, and did I mention that he created his own article? His notability has not been established. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 07:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:29, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. Album track only, never released as a single. Article has been flagged for lack of references for over a year with no improvement, suggesting none are to be found Paul75 ( talk) 06:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article may constitute a failed attempt to promote a particular product/website (there is no {{reflist}} to generate the intended hyperlink). The article is written in corporate newspeak, making it inaccessible to a lay audience and not able to be generalised for the purposes of a general-interest encyclopedia. Richard Cavell ( talk) 06:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. Never released as a single, album track only. Unreferenced. Paul75 ( talk) 06:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Autobiography of non-notable actor. No IMDB entry. No valid references. Gogo Dodo ( talk) 06:23, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. Album track only, never released as a single. Unreferenced and OR. Paul75 ( talk) 06:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to True Blue (album). MBisanz talk 02:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. US Promo release only. Never charted. Unreferenced Paul75 ( talk) 06:17, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to True Blue (album). MBisanz talk 02:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails notability per WP:SONG. Song is an album track only, has never been released as a single and has only ever been performed once. What scant (unreferenced) information there is can easily be included in the parent album's article Paul75 ( talk) 06:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete under criterion A7. Enigma message 07:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Notability. Author keeps deleting speedy tags, and deleted prod tag. — Jeff G. ( talk| contribs) 06:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:21, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (films), as shooting has not yet begun. Sources in article are mostly about the stars, with the film being a passing mention. Prod contested by IP editor without comment. Fabrictramp | talk to me 06:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. (Non-admin closure) ApprenticeFan ( talk) 10:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This was a boxing match this past night that has no real lasting value. While it involved notable fighters, it in and of itself was rather unremarkable: it was not even for a title.
Keeping a boxing match like this would be like keeping an article for the 2007 Indianapolis-New England regular season NFL game - yeah the teams were good but the game had no lasting value. -- CastAStone //₵₳$↑₳ ₴₮ʘ№€ 05:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Kept. =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article does not appear to meet the requirements of WP:N. I would like further opinions regarding this. Also, as per the text present in the Career section, it is clear the creator of this article is also the subject of this article, and therefore is prone to WP:COI(note the use of first-person word I in the last sentence in the Career section). — Dæ dαlus Contribs / Improve 11:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete a7, no assertion of notability. NawlinWiki ( talk) 05:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Nn-notable company Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 05:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:20, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Site does not appear to pass WP:WEB. Article is written entirely from the primary source. Few wiki links (tagged since last year). Pcap ping 10:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete.
MBisanz
talk
02:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
This article has gone a year without any credible sources and isn't very encyclopediac anyway. Looks like Japanese pop-culture-cruft. RobertM525 ( talk) 03:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:18, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:BIO and WP:NM, non-notable person with lack of third-party reliable sources. Diverse Mentality 20:13, 22 November 2008 (UTC) reply
Can't believe i am editing this for the first time since 2008! Am I the only one who heard his song in 9 years?! by mistake of course
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe the company fails notability - it is a retail company with a website, and I cannot find anything that could be added to the article without it turning into an advert. Putney Bridge ( talk) 00:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, A7; notability not even asserted. While the article was admittedly a masterpiece, when the issue is one of notability it doesn't matter. Author blocked as a spam-only account. Blueboy 96 05:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Promotional. No claims of notability. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 04:49, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Not sure what you mean? What makes other web applications "notable"? Do I need to include mashable, ZDNet or PRWeek articles to justify our legitimacy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pitchengine ( talk • contribs) 05:05, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:14, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article doesn't meet
notability requirements for albums. I can't find any sources as to charting, or any coverage at all about the album, in order to give it more than a track list. Given that "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting", I tried a redirect to the artist's article,
Richie Rich (rapper), but that was reverted. So I'm bringing it here for further discussion as to whether it is notable enough for an article.
Raven1977 (
talk)
04:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
I am also nominating two additional albums by the same artist, for the same reasons of lacking notability and no sources found to provide notability:
All Right Simply Put It Those Albums Did'nt Chart Man Those Albums Werent Popular Richie Rich Isnt That Popular Anymore
Ok
Well Heres Some Links Man from very reliable sources
http://www.discogs.com/artist/Richie+Rich+(2)
http://www.discogs.com/release/1007292
http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/richie_rich/artist.jhtml
http://www.mtv.com/music/artist/richie_rich/albums.jhtml?albumId=736461
http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/richie_rich/736461/album.jhtml
http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/richie_rich/albums.jhtml
http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/richie_rich/239017/album.jhtml
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:acfwxqykldae
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:dvftxqukldae
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:0jfyxq80ldje
http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:hcfoxqraldje —Preceding unsigned comment added by The4's ( talk • contribs) 08:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Cirt ( talk) 15:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
according to multiple WP:RS, "Maal literally mean Property". Not a mythical creature, as this Article purports. Unless there is a translation error, I believe this Article should be Deleted Exit2DOS2000• T• C• 04:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn - meets WP:PROF ~ my error. ZimZalaBim talk 14:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Doesn't appear to satisfy WP:BIO. ZimZalaBim talk 04:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Filipino martial arts. MBisanz talk 02:15, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This stub fails WP:NOTE and could possibly be a hoax as well. - MBK 004 04:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:22, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Likely non-notable company founder. Company does exist, however. Opening for discussion. Master&Expert ( Talk) 03:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Cirt ( talk) 15:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I believe that this article is unsuitable for inclusion. It is unclear to me for what purpose this article exists. This article may exist to promote the website www.galleryofpearls.com. It may otherwise be an essay, or someone's opinion, that has not achieved widespread acceptance. Richard Cavell ( talk) 02:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:PORNBIO with only a nomination with an ensemble of 10 actors. Twice deleted for not showing notability, including as Lexi Marie. -- Jeandré, 2008-12-07 t02:48z 02:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Professional wrestling holds#Elevated double chickenwing. ( non-admin closure) PeterSymonds ( talk) 16:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable wrestling move. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 02:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:13, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Despite claims to the contrary simply being picked in the draft does not make this person notable and therefore he appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 12:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
American actor with no notable roles. The clearly auto-generated three-sentence stub claims he appeared in 24 films, but counts appearances on television shows. No sources other than IMDB, nor even the slightest claim of notability: essentially, a re-purposed IMDB entry of no encyclopaedic value. CalendarWatcher ( talk) 22:45, 26 November 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Despite claims to the contrary simply being picked in the draft does not make this person notable and therefore he appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:12, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Despite claims to the contrary simply being picked in the draft does not make this person notable and therefore he appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:11, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to fail WP:Athlete as he has not competed at the fully professional level of this sport, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport. Once he has played at the fully professional level of this sport he can be recreated but until then this is just a crystal ball AFL stub. -- VS talk 22:20, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:08, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I created this article about a local news woman in Florida working for Central Florida News 13 as I felt it would be a good idea. However, I'm now beggining to think that this article does not need to be on Wikipedia due to the fact that Crabtree is only local and not national. What do you think?
Before I end what I have to say, I feel the below article on a local weather anchor in Chicago which I also created an article about faces the same issues that Melissa Crabtree faces:
— Mythdon ( talk • contribs) 02:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There have been numerous sources that prove the groups exist and have data published about them, but the trivial intersection issue was not addressed. Mgm| (talk) 11:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. Cordless Larry ( talk) 22:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of Firefox extensions. MBisanz talk 02:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article about a Firefox extension that makes no claim of notability and is unsourced. A {{ prod}} was removed by creator without comment. ZimZalaBim talk 02:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. nomination withdrawn. Mgm| (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Finished unfinished nom for OneCyclone. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy deleted as copyvio from http://www.tajhotels.com/abouttaj/companyinformation/HistoryOfTaj.htm .
I'm suggesting this page be merged with Taj Hotel, but would like community consensus before doing so. I don't know if I'm supposed to post a merge suggestion here or elsewhere. My apologies in advance for that. ~Beano~ (talk) (contribs) 01:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep per withdrawal of nomination with no "delete" opinions registered. Non-admin closure. Deor ( talk) 01:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
While I am sure that Kentucky Route 915 is a fine place to travel, live, and such, but it is just one more road in the US. I don't think Wikipedia needs an article for each interesting road in the world. I don't feel strongly about this, so this is a "weak delete". sinneed ( talk) 01:08, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article may be too speculative for inclusion in wikipedia. I cannot find any evidence of a new generation on the Bakugan website. A Google search reveals one link - [45] - which is a post from a forum. The New Generation may represent wishful thinking, or fan fiction. In any case, it is unverifiable.
The article's author has also added some info to the Bakugan Battle Brawlers article. If the closing admin decides to delete, I suggest that the addition to the main BBB article also be undone. Richard Cavell ( talk) 01:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
To change the subject there also also sites mentioning an unrelated new season of Bakugan under a different name BAKUGAN: NEW VESTROIA and barring an elaborate hoax the sources for this one are more numerous and appear to be more reliable than sources for the fan fic in question. [ [46]] [ [47]]. The google serach in question was [ [48]] if someone wants to look at the rest of the sources. In short if any are of the two are real it is more likely new vestoria. -- 76.71.208.23 ( talk) 00:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Completing nomination for IP. Reason on edit summary was:
I abstain. MrKIA11 ( talk) 19:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:05, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is not built from independent, reliable sources (WP:V), and does not explain how it meets the notability guidelines (WP:Bio) - level of activity is not an indication of notability. Oo7565 ( talk) 17:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4. Ice Cold Beer ( talk) 05:51, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Repost, but may not qualify for a G4 (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Leave Me in Love). Album has no professional reviews, only sources are a fansite and last.fm, both very unreliable. Dierks is notable without a doubt, but there's nothing about this album. Seriously. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 00:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No content, no references, just a dicdef & list `' Míkka >t 03:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:18, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
fails WP:CREATIVE. simply being a radio presenter is not necessarily notable. Very limited third party coverage in Google news search. Michellecrisp ( talk) 05:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article describes a future product that is not yet complete. It is unclear whether the product is a computer game, a demo, or a social networking utility. It is unclear whether it will be commercial or free. The product does not appear to have acquired notability. Richard Cavell ( talk) 06:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The article, orphaned since September 2006, fails to indicate the notability and importance of this trust fund set up in 1893. Ohconfucius ( talk) 06:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Completely non-notable organization, all references are in passing, plagued with original research issues, lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme ( talk) 07:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A youth player who hasn't played an official match for Ajax and afaict hasn't played an official match for Odense either. Aecis·(away) talk 09:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable single--failed to chart. roux 12:13, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 01:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable local grocery stores. roux 14:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable sandwich. Already covered in Primanti Brothers. Contested prod. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 15:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
If the other sandwiches from the "sandwiches" article deserve their own pages, then so does the Pitts-burgher. It's as simple as that. And yes, it's called the Pitts-burgher. Here's the proof: http://www.primantibrothers.com/menu/city/strip/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Keyboardplaya ( talk • contribs) 04:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirecting The Bagatelle Card Club → The Adventure of the Empty House, and The Tankerville Club → The Five Orange Pips. keep Killer Evans. - Mgm| (talk) 11:32, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Completely non-notable and generally un-necessary as an article. The subjects have no significance to anything. ╟─ Treasury Tag► contribs─╢ 18:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to One Life to Live children#Jack Manning. I've deleted the page as the concensus seems to say, but redirected in my capacity as an editor because Richard's idea seemed logical. Mgm| (talk) 08:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable child actor with only a single minor role (probably non-speaking) to his credit. — TAnthony Talk 21:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Mgm| (talk) 08:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails
WP:BIO,
WP:MUSIC. The only coverage I can find is the reference mentioned in the short interview in
The New York Magazine "look book", which is far from significant coverage.
I redirected Kautz' band
Electric Tickle Machine article to his biography, thinking that Kautz was notable at that point. The band fails
WP:MUSIC though, too, with only
one additional name drop (in Welsh).
Amalthea
22:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. Kesac ( talk) 16:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article has been deleted after an AfD before and was re-created within 5 hours of the closure of that AfD. Subsequent speedy (G4) was declined, because the album had been released since the previous AfD. A prod with reason "article on an album without any reliable independent sources. Article consists of little more than track listing, with links to promotional websites" was declined with stated reason "sources ARE reliable" (they may be, but they are not independent). In the more than 2 months that have passed since, no sources indicating notability for this album have been forthcoming. A Google search results in some track-listings, some websites where the album can be bought (or downloaded using torrents), and the website of the artist himself. Given the lack of reliable third-party sources: delete. -- Crusio ( talk) 00:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Unsourced BLP, does not appear to be a notable artist, possibly even a hoax: I can't find any Google hits about him. Most Google hits appear to be about a musician of the same name, or match the German words Kasper weiß ("Caspar knows"). Sandstein 21:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC) reply