* Baba Alam Siahposh
− − − − −
− |
− − − − − − − −
− |
−
−
−
− If you don't have time to fix citations/references at the moment, you can still help by tagging the article so that others can find and fix them.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Hello again,
− Just wondering...how do you archive your personal talk page? I tried following the steps as noted, but they seem really confusing to me. Thank you. -- PAKHIGHWAY ( talk) 22:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Saqib, first you deserve credit for creating this article on 21 January 2017. All I did yesterday was to try to expand it a little bit with a reference to a recognized solid business news website Bloomberg.com. I am trying to be courteous to you, rather than revert you as you did to me, and first ask you a question on your Talk page here. I am just curious as to why you removed some of my added lines when they are clearly backed up by Bloomberg.com website. For example, Bloomberg.com website says that he is a "Director of Pakistan Business Council from 2013 – present" and also the Chairman of Descon Limited. In case you were in a hurry and did not click on the Bloomberg.com website link 'Read Full Background' given below the 'Partial Profile Background' shown on their website, then you apparently missed seeing those extra lines that I am talking about? By the way, I do remember you fixing one of my Dawn (newspaper) links for me couple of months ago and I did appreciate your help (it was my fault and all of us make mistakes occasionally). I am just asking you to take another look at Bloomberg.com website's Profile of Abdul Razak Dawood. Thanks Ngrewal1 ( talk) 17:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
−
−
−
![]() | This
user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this
user page
has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{
in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was
last edited by
Ngrewal1 (
talk |
contribs) 2 months ago. (
Update timer) |
−
![]() | This
user page is actively undergoing a
major edit for a little while. To help avoid
edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed. This page was last edited at 23:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) (2 months ago) – this estimate is cached, . Please remove this template if this page hasn't been edited for a significant time. If you are the editor who added this template, please be sure to remove it or replace it with {{ Under construction}} between editing sessions. |
−
![]() | This
user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this
user page
has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{
in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was
last edited by
Ngrewal1 (
talk |
contribs) 2 months ago. (
Update timer) |
−
−
−
− /info/en/?search=User_talk:Bhadani/Archive1 MARHOOM BHADANI TALK page ARCHIVES 2018
−
−
− {{sidebar with collapsible lists
− | name = History of Pakistan
− | bodyclass = vcard
− | wraplinks = true
− | title = {{region history sidebar title
−
|region = Pakistan
−
|image =
− }}
− |liststyle = background:#iee;text-align:left;
− |listclass = nowrap
−
−
|list1title = Ancient
− |list1 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− | list2title = Classical
− | list2 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− | list3title = Medieval
− | list3 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− | list4title = Modern
− | list4 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− | list5title = Related articles
− | list5 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− }}
−
−
For infobox use:
− caption = The Map of Line of Control
−
−
File:− | |
Company type | Public corporation − |
---|---|
Industry |
Textile industry Energy development International trading − |
Founded | 1972 | −
Headquarters |
Lahore
− ,
Pakistan
− |
Key people | Inam Ellahi Shaikh Shaukat Ellahi Shaikh [1] Shafqat Ellahi Shaikh − |
Revenue | ![]() $100 million USD ( FY 2006) − |
Website |
www |
−
−
Nagina Group is a Pakistani
conglomerate company which is based in
Lahore,
Pakistan. It manufactures a wide variety of
textile products.
−
−
The company was founded in 1972 by Inam Ellahi Shaikh and Ashan Ellahi Shaikh. Nagina Cotton/Yarns (a subsidiary of Nagina Group) was listed by
Forbes magazine as among the best-performing-companies with less than US $1 billion in revenue in 2003.
[2]
[1]
[3]
−
−
− The Nagina Group began as a single company, Nagina Mills Limited, established by Shaikh Inam Ellahi and Ashan Ellahi Shaikh in 1967. [4] Focusing on the production of cotton yarn, it grew with the acquisition of tanneries, factories that produced shoes and ice, and Pakistan's largest jute mill. These assets were lost, however, when East Pakistan separated from the Pakistani Federation to become Bangladesh in 1971. In 2006, Managing Director of Nagina Group, Shafqat Ellahi Shaikh was elected Chairman of All Pakistan Textile Mills Association. [5]
−
−
− The company restructured itself in 1972 as the Nagina Group, consolidating its assets under a single umbrella organization.
−
−
The group currently manages these subsidiaries:
−
− (Note: All the stock exchanges in Pakistan – Karachi Stock Exchange, Lahore Stock Exchange and Islamabad Stock Exchange were merged into Pakistan Stock Exchange on 11 January 2016. So the old and modified company trading symbols on all financial websites may not be updated yet)
−
−
−
−
−
−
Nagina Group also operates three private
power plants to provide electricity for its mills. The installed capacity of its generators is 30.57
Megawatts. Excess energy is sold to other industrial facilities in the area.
−
−
Nagina Cotton Mills Limited is the flagship company of the Group, established in 1967. The company operates spinning machinery comprising 47,040 spindles with related textile processing machines. In 2014, the Managing Director and CEO of Nagina Group was optimistic about his companies " future business prospects for exports to the European markets."
[11]
−
−
Nagina Group is active in the textile and cotton spinning, weaving, energy, real estate, and trading sectors in Pakistan.
[3]
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− No progress from previous AfD, no new sources found. Fails to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Those already present are not WP:RS as many are directory listings. Störm (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Dear GorgCustersSabre, as a fellow Wikipedian and a fellow Muslim, I am asking you to re-consider your REVERT of my work on Sulaiman Nadvi. I spent some hours gathering information first and then many hours doing the actual editing work. I have been editing Wikipedia for 6 years now, so please don't treat me like a new guy. I also fully realize that you have been on Wikipedia longer than me. You should know and recall that I have NEVER REVERTED your work over these 6 years even though it only takes a few seconds to do so and it's so CONVENIENT! It has been my choice not to adopt a supervising and monitoring role on Wikipedia. My Wikipedia contributions over 6 years have been mainly Islam-related (mostly Muslim personalities) and Pakistan-related, and I believe supervising and monitoring other people's work is also badly needed on Wikipedia since it's the 5th largest website worldwide for daily internet traffic. All kinds of disruptors and vandals need to be stopped also. So both roles, yours and mine, are needed.
−
−
Back to Sulaiman Nadvi, I had fixed and updated all the references. To my surprise, even the reliable Dawn newspaper reference was dead. So I searched for and replaced it with their NEW website for the same title, Myths about Urdu. With the reverted Sulaiman Nadvi article, as it is now, Dawn reference and salaam.co.uk references are dead now! Also Pakistan Post Office issued 'Pioneers of Freedom' commemorative postage stamp material and reference is gone for Sulaiman Nadvi and
− is deleted which he definitely deserves to have. Sadly, Pakistan Post Office does not maintain its website going back to 1992. So one has no choice but to use other available websites. Please make suggestions here or on my Talk page...Revert is not the only way to go. Either one of us can make the article better, hopefully. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 19:59, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Umrao Bundu Khan (1915 - 1970) was a Pakistani sarangi player.
[1]
−
−
− Khan was born in 1970 to renowned sarangi player Bundu Khan. He learned vocal music from his uncle Chand Khan, a lagend of the Delhi Gharana.
−
−
− In 1970 Khan emigrated to Pakistan. He was a staff artist at All India Radio and was also a performed at Radio Pakistan. In 1954 he was invited to Akhil Bharatiya Khadi Pradarshini in Karachi, where he gave many concerts. He performed in Pakistan as well as in other countries. Khan was also a versatile singer, who sang mostly khayal, thumri, dadra, tarana, qaul and kalbana. [2] [3]
−
−
− Khan died in 1970 at the age of 55 in Karachi [4]
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− ZOOMABLE GOOGLE MAP OF PAKISTAN AND INDIA - expands and shrinks to show all details of cities. Left double-click MINUS AND PLUS on the small BAR on the MAP to zoom in and out.
−
−
Baitul Mukarram
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7] Masjid in Urdu (بیت ال مکرّم)
[8]
[9] is the second largest mosque of Karachi , it is located in Block 17
Gulshan e Iqbal ,
Karachi. It is near
Urdu University and
Expo Center Karachi.
−
−
Baitul Mukarram | |
---|---|
Location | |
Location | Gulshan Iqbal Karachi |
Geographic coordinates | 24°54′27″N 67°04′58″E / 24.9073634°N 67.0827195°E |
−
−
− Baitul Mukarram Masjid [10] has an Islamic educational institute within the mosque, where students can get Islamic education.
−
−
From the published pictures of the mosque, it looks clean , large and beautiful and it is under the administration of
Darul Uloom Karachi. Large number of people come in this mosque to attend the
Marriage in Islam ceremony or
Nikkah ceremony of their loved ones. Amir Shahab was a 'Khateeb' ('Administrator') of this mosque but he was shot dead by unknown terrorists near Nipa Chowrangi ,
Karachi on 22 March 2019, Mufti
Muhammad Taqi Usmani was with Amir Shahab but Mufti Taqi Usmani survived the attack.
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15].
−
−
−
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
−
−
−
−
− Warning: Default sort key "Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi)" overrides earlier default sort key "Umrao Bundu Khan".
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Unrelated coverage/references. Nothing notable in reliable sources. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 07:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) ) has mentioned Bait ul mukarram masjid karachi.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 09:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)−
−
−
−
−
−
Hi i could to it better if its not deleted i will add 5 references but they are in urdu language. BBC urdu ( سہیل, ریاض (22 March 2019).
"مفتی تقی عثمانی قاتلانہ حملے میں بال بال بچ گئے". Retrieved 4 December 2019. ) has also passing mention of bait ul mukarram masjid but in urdu. i have also mentioned in article that mufti taqi usmani is amir of mosque also mufti shahab.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 15:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
After bbc urdu i have added two more references one is from urdu magazine talking about bait ul mukarram masjid and surrounding and one from urdu news website. any urdu editors are welcome to check :)
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 15:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Comment - Most of the coverage is only helpful to verify the mosque, but still no sources verify the claim of 'second-largest mosque'. Still fails WP:SIGCOV. Störm (talk) 09:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
Hi This is the offical website of Darul uloom karachi and they have mentioned about "bait ul mukarram masjid" they are explaining when the mosque was built and on how many acres and students get islamic education and many other details:
"جامع مسجد دارالعلوم کراچی | جامعہ دارالعلوم کراچی" (in Urdu). Retrieved 6 December 2019.. --
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 08:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
Its 9th day completed and 10th day is started so can someone delete this tag ? as it has all the information updated and i will occasionally update more.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 17:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 22:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi)−
−
−
−
−
−
I have added few references and will add more in urdu too , the article is ok and have enough references now.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 08:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 14:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
This is government of karachi website and its in english passing mosque
[1] also i am adding few more references.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 14:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Dormant since 2011. Weak coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:NWEB. Störm (talk) 19:41, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 ( talk) 01:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Hope this helps. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 18:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistaniat
−
−
Pakistaniat: All Things Pakistan is a
blog launched in 2006 by editor
Adil Najam about cultural and political issues in
Pakistan. It has been widely cited in both the Pakistani and Indian press, such as
Dawn (newspaper) and
Outlook (Indian magazine), and international newspapers and radio stations such as
The Guardian and the U.S.
National Public Radio.
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
PAY ATTENTION, USEFUL LINKS FOR YOU IN THE FOLLOWING Chowk.com:
−
−
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− No significant coverage in WP:RS. Poor Alexa rank. Fails WP:NWEB. Defunct website. Störm (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion. This article needs to demonstrate notability per WP:NWEB, WP:NCORP, WP:GNG or some other applicable notability guideline. So far this is lacking, however a single participant arguing delete is also not a consensus.
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 03:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)− @ Barkeep49: Am I the only git idiot enough or maybe with the nous enough to sort through dead links and bring existing sources to this site? I've done the minimum on the article to switch on url-status=dead where necessary. Can you please do a temp-undelete on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowk.com (2nd nomination) for me, it almost certainly contains nothing useful but I'd like to know the page creator anyway. I'll sift through the existing AfD sources over the weekend as no one else can be arsed to do it. There's also a little precedents news sites in tricky areas are sometimes given a little slack by the community. Tough luck at WP:ARBCOM. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 11:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Djm-leighpark, my rule of thumb is I make one administrative action per AfD. Since I relisted I will leave it to another sysop to close. However, I will note while there is no minimum length of time after a relist to close, they normally get closed a week or so after relisting so it probably won't be until then. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
![]() | The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's
general notability guideline. (January 2019) |
−
−
![]() |
−
Muhammad Rafi Usmani محمد رفیع عثمانی − | |
---|---|
3rd President of Darul Uloom Karachi − | |
In office Assumed office 1986 − | |
Preceded by | − |
2nd Mufti of Darul Uloom Karachi − | |
In office In office 1976 − | |
Preceded by | − |
Personal | |
Born |
Deoband
− | July 21, 1936
−
Religion | Islam − |
Denomination | Sunni Islam − |
Jurisprudence | − |
Movement | Deobandi − |
Alma mater | − |
−
−
Muhammad Rafi Usmani (
Urdu: محمد رفیع عثمانی, Muḥammad Rafī‘ Us̱mānī) is a
Pakistani
Sunni
Islamic scholar who serves as President of
Darul Uloom Karachi, the largest seminary or religious institution in the city of
Karachi, Pakistan.
[1]
[2]
−
−
Muhammad Rafi Usmani (
Urdu: محمد رفیع عثمانی, Muḥammad Rafī‘ Us̱mānī) is a
Pakistani
Sunni
Islamic scholar who serves as President of
Darul Uloom Karachi, the largest seminary or religious institution in the city of
Karachi, Pakistan.
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
−
−
− Rafi Usmani was born on 21 July 1936 at Deoband, Uttar Pradesh, British India. [8]
− Rafi Usmani has been a Grand Mufti of Pakistan and the elder brother of another noted Grand Mufti of Pakistan, Mufti Taqi Usmani. Both brothers are the sons of Muhammad Shafi Usmani, the founder of Darul Uloom Karachi in 1951. [9] [8]
−
−
−
− On 16 January 2018, a historic fatwa (a religious decree or opinion) was issued by religious scholars of many schools of thought to fight global terrorism, extremism and sectarianism. The fatwa was drafted by means of consultative process among most prominent religious scholars in Pakistan. This decree was jointly termed as Paigham-i-Pakistan (Message of Pakistan) and unveiled at an official event by the President of Pakistan, Interior Minister of Pakistan and the Foreign Minister of Pakistan. At this event, the government wanted to try to make it clear to the entire world that most Islamic religious scholars and the government of Pakistan are united against terrorism, extremism and sectarianism. "The fatwa will provide a platform for national unity..." The interior minister said while addressing the gathering. [10]
−
−
Speaking to
Associated Press of Pakistan (APP) news agency, Mufti Rafi Usmani described the unveiling of the fatwa as a historic event in Pakistan. He explained that Islamic scholars from all sects had considered and discussed each word in the 'fatwa document' for months before finally announcing it.
[10]
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
goodreads
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).−
−
−
−
−
Warning: Default sort key "Usmani, Muhammad Rafi" overrides earlier default sort key "Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi)".
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The result was keep.
(non-admin closure)
Störm
(talk) 09:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Non notable Deobandi seminary. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 20:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
− Keep Jamia Darul Uloom, Karachi, Pakistan is one of the largest university and institution for religious education in the city of Karachi. This article is much improved now. It now has references from two major Pakistani newspapers and two international news websites – Dawn (newspaper), The News International, Arab News, The 500 Most Influential Muslims ( The Muslim 500). Ngrewal1 ( talk) 16:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidh e 01:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)− Keep Jamia Darul Uloom, Karachi, Pakistan is notable.16:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Night fury 11:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)− Keep No evidence of BEFORE; nomination is simply an assertion. One of the main Islamic seminaries of Pakistan. UCS. -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 23:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The result was keep. Asad Madni was a Member of Parliament as per the source mentioned in the article:
https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/pre_member/1952_2003/m.pdf
(non-admin closure)
❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁
(❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 02:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Non notable Islamist scholar and politician from India. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 08:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Your closure at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/As'ad_Madani was incorrect. As the nominator you must withdraw the nomination, you cannot close the nomination as you are an involved party. Please revert your edit and follow the correct proceedure for withdrawal, which is outlined here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal). In future with any article you choose to nominate for deletion, please ensure you effectively undertake WP:BEFORE – in particular carrying out actions described in D1. Thank you.-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 09:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Hi - just a small heads up, while the effect is the same, in these cases the more accurate procedure is withdrawal, rather than closure. See:
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal). Regards,--
Goldsztajn (
talk) 10:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
You filed two reports at
WP:SPI, each with no evidence. In one I've asked you to provide evidence. I deleted the other. These filings are disruptive. If you do it again, you risk being blocked.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 18:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Dear wikipedia user,
− I have noticed that you have your own interests in wikipedia, and you contribute well to the related articles. Congratulations. Sharing your knowledge in a particular field to the world is the very core thing every wikipedian should have. But the very basic principle is that nobody in the world is perfect. If you present something before a community (whether online or offline), you ma== SPIs ==
−
−
You filed two reports at
WP:SPI, each with no evidence. In one I've asked you to provide evidence. I deleted the other. These filings are disruptive. If you do it again, you risk being blocked.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 18:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
− y be challenged, you may be questioned, somebody may request fact check, and somebody with the authority may take the action if you are wrong. You have to accept all those because you have the responsibility of the knowledge you share to others. I've noticed that you opened a sock puppet investgation on me and another unrelated user without valid evidence, just because you didn't like the edits these two random users made to your favorite topics. You couldn't revert those edits, you couldn't challenge those edits, because they were almost genuine, so you called for a sockpuppet investgation. This behaviour so disruptive and a good wikipedian shouldn't do this. So I'll watch all your future contributions to find any misbehaviour like this, and you'll be corrected or reported.
− Thank you.
− Sneha Raphael SnehaRaphael1996 ( talk) 23:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
The result was keep.
(non-admin closure)
Störm
(talk) 06:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− No coverage found. Fails WP:NPROF. Störm (talk) 07:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
In a Memorial reference on 26 November 2002, Dr. Badruddin Soomro, Chairman PARC, Islamabad announced that the Institute of Agriculture Biotechnology and Genetics Research (IABGR) NARC/PARC, Islamabad has been renamed after Dr. Azra Quraishi", I can't find evidence of this renaming (it might have been renamed again - a lot can happen in 18 years!) Pam D 15:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
− To GeorgeCustersSabre
−
Please leave it alone, when you can see I am still editing it. I placed a
![]() | This
user page is actively undergoing a
major edit for a little while. To help avoid
edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed. This page was last edited at 23:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) (2 months ago) – this estimate is cached, . Please remove this template if this page hasn't been edited for a significant time. If you are the editor who added this template, please be sure to remove it or replace it with {{ Under construction}} between editing sessions. |
tag on it now. If I start doing that to you back, I am sure you won't like it because we will have Edit Conflicts and lose work this way back and forth. So there is no need to irritate each other. Thanks Ngrewal1 ( talk) 19:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots 20:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)−
−
−
− I noticed that you stated "I am trying to be in PR business for celebrities and this is a part of it." Please read WP:Paid-contribution disclosure to learn about the restrictions and requirements should you engage in editing Wikipedia on behalf of a company or client. Schazjmd (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC) vs GorgeCustersSabre
−
−
−
−
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to
Grand Mufti, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors
do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —
Hammad
(Talk!) 10:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Hi - just a small heads up, while the effect is the same, in these cases the more accurate procedure is withdrawal, rather than closure. See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal). Regards,-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 10:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
− Hi, please read WP:Overtagging as in most cases the two most important tags are sufficient, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
− Greetings and my Salaams. This is a checkuser request to you for User:Authordom (old ID - User:Kutyava). I have been editing Wikipedia since 2012 and never have made this kind of request or even a minor complaint to any other Wikipedia administrators against anyone in my 7 years history of editing. Since you are an administrator, you can verify this from my Wikipedia records and history. But this person has pushed me over the edge. Seems to me - he is systematically and cleverly targeting all Islamic religious groups or sects other than his own religious group in South India, headed by Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar. From all his Deletion Nominations both on AfD India and AfD Pakistan within last couple months, you can see his pattern of nominations and draw your conclusions. Personally I have never retaliated against him and have never nominated even a SINGLE Wiki article for deletion - religious or non-religious....period! So you can also verify this that I have not provoked him. For example, please just pick up Maulana Asad Madani's nomination by him which resulted as ('Result:Keep') on 12 March 2020. * Asad Madani Ngrewal1 ( talk) 01:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
− Could you let me know what areas need to be worked on? I know the categories are missing? Because I still cant understand why the article is not accepted even though its resources are very strong links and credible sources.-- Salut65 ( talk) 11:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Welfare Party of India. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Flix11 (
talk) 09:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Muhammad (Karakunnu), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In
this edit summary, you wrote "Ask for citation, not to remove instantly". Please note that per
WP:ONUS - the responsibility is on you to provide the citations, not the other way around. Hence, the content that you have added -- without citations -- has been removed. —
MelbourneStar☆
talk 11:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC) about
User:Irshadpp
−
−
−
−
Tip of the day...
Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia
Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia is a list of insights about Wikipedia specifically targeted at people who have limited or no prior experience with the project (such as journalists, new editors, and new readers). These explanations should not surprise experienced editors but will hopefully help the rest of the world to shape an informed opinion of our work. – – To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{
totd3}}
|
−
−
−
−
− Hey, I've filled a report against Authordom at intervention against vandalism. He has been nominating notable Deobandi pages, possibly non-Barelwi pages for deletion, and recently the likes of Asad Madni and Darul Uloom Karachi, and thus misusing this feature. He has been spamming the Grand Mufti page also. He seems to look like owner of any Wikipedia page, who regards every verified edit by others as non-notable because the Mufti is not Barelwi possibly. Can someone block him from editing? - Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 11:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
− @ Authordom:, I saw you nominating notable Deobandi pages recently for deletion, that's not right thing. You could've added more references tag rather, Mufti Rafi Usmani or Darul Uloom Karachi etc are internationally well-known, their notability can't be questioned. If we have articles in stub quality, isn't it better for us to improve them? You can ask others for improvements. I think that directly tagging any notable article for deletion is not right, until one makes proper research on the subject. You could've recently improved Asad Madni, but besides notability, you regarded him as non-notable. If those who had voted, have had not researched on the subject, the page would've been no more, because of your nomination. Right, you follow AfD rules and you've right to nominate any article for deletion. But before it, cleanup, improve tags may be concerned. Hope you get my points. Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 11:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Thanks to everyone who has given this issue a good eye. The user is misusing the AfD and portraying bias through it. Reading all from Goldsztajn and Llywrch, I think it is enough time to block Authordom from nominating articles for deletion. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 14:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
− − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − −
− |
Date
− |
Article at AfD
− |
Authordom's claim in full for deletion
− |
Deobandi -
− related − |
Comment
− |
Result
− |
Review?
− |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
− |
22.03
− |
IslamOnline
− |
"Non notable Muslim Brotherhood linked website."
− |
![]() − |
Redirect to
Yusuf al-Qaradawi would possibly be more appropriate action.
− |
Not closed yet
− |
—
− |
2
− |
18.03
− |
Jamiatul Qasim Darul Uloom Al-Islamiah
− |
"Non notable Islamist seminary in India."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
Not closed yet
− |
—
− |
3
− |
18.03
− |
Madrasatul Islah
− |
"Non notable Islamic seminary."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE carried out. I !voted Keep, founded by notable scholars, produced notable scholars
− |
Not closed yet
− |
—
− |
4
− |
11.03
− |
Asad Madni
− |
"Non notable Islamist scholar and politician from India."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE carried out. Elected politician, easily verifiable.
− |
KEEP*
− |
![]() − |
5
− |
11.03
− |
Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions
− |
"The organization does not seem notable. But its founders are notable."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; notability easily verifiable
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
6
− |
11.03
− |
Union of Catholic Asian News
− |
"I think it is a non notable news portal."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; notability easily verifiable
− |
SNOW KEEP
− |
![]() − |
7
− |
10.03
− |
Muhammad Rafi Usmani
− |
"Non notable Islamist from Pakistan."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE;notability easily verifiable
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
8
− |
24.02
− |
Muhammad Saad Kandhlawi
− |
"Non notable Indian religious scholar."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE;notability easily verifiable
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
9
− |
24.02
− |
Maulana Zubair ul Hassan
− |
"Non notable
Tablighi Jamaat worker"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; notability easily verifiable
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
10
− |
24.02
− |
Muhammad Talha Kandhlawi
− |
"Nominating for speedy deletion, non notable."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE carried out. A proposed merger with
Muhammad Zakariyya al-Kandhlawi would possibly be more appropriate
− |
Not closed yet
− |
—
− |
11
− |
24.02
− |
Iftikhar-ul-Hasan Kandhlawi
− |
"Non notable Indian Islamic scholar."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
12
− |
24.02
− |
Inamul Hasan Kandhlawi
− |
"Non notable Muslim scholar from India."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
13
− |
23.02
− |
Madrasah Islamiah
− |
"Non notable article about a Deobandi school."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
14
− |
23.02
− |
Jamia Darul Uloom, Karachi
− |
"Non notable Deobandi seminary."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
15
− |
23.02
− |
Jamiah Farooqia, Karachi
− |
"Non notable Islamist seminary"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
16
− |
23.02
− |
Jamiatur Rasheed, Karachi
− |
"Non Notable seminary."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
17
− |
23.02
− |
Ahsan-Ul-Uloom
− |
"Non notable Islamist seminary"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
18
− |
19.02
− |
Ideal Relief Wing Kerala
− |
"Non notable charitable NGO managed by the
Jamaat-e-Islami Kerala chapter."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
19
− |
18.02
− |
Madrasah as-Sawlatiyah
− |
"No scope to keep, because unable to pass even the
WP:GNG."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
KEEP*
− |
![]() − |
20
− |
18.02
− |
Jamia Khair-ul-Madaris
− |
"Non notable."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; academic study on history of the school.
[3]
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
21
− |
18.02
− |
Madrasa Mifthahul Uloom
− |
"I think no scope to keep the non notable article."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE.
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
22
− |
18.02
− |
Al-Jamiatul Islamiah Qasemul Uloom Charia
− |
Non notable Qawmi Madrasah
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
23
− |
18.02
− |
Jamia Luthfia Anwarul Uloom Hamidnagar
− |
"Non notable Qawmi Madrasah located in Bangladesh"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
24
− |
18.02
− |
Jamia Rahmania Arabia Dhaka
− |
"Non notable Deobandi madrasa"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; one of the largest madrassas in Bangladesh.
[4]
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
25
− |
18.02
− |
Al-Jamiatul Arabiatul Islamia, Ziri
− |
"Not notable Islamic religious institution"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; 100+ years old, third largest madrassa in Bangladesh
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
− *(closed inappropriately by Authordom, should have been speedy keep/nominator withdrawal.)
−
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
− -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 19:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
is clear inappropriate canvassing by AaqibAnjum. Don’t do that again, please. — MarkH21 talk 21:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Hey Sneha, I just noticed that you have faced some issues from Authordom, the biased editor I have ever seen on the Wikipedia. I have added a complaint about him on Administrators Noticeboard. I wish you to help me in getting him banned.
−
−
−
I have been concerned on the articles relating to the Indian Subcontinent of at least a handful of editors nominating sets of articles over a relatively short period of time at AfD over a relatively short time exhausting any significant scrutiny at AfD. That said the sourcing of many of the articles are of the poorest quality; online sources not linkrot protected, and the use of foreign language sources of the poorest quality. Authordom's nominations are often vaguewave; but I do note pre-tagging of
Template:Notabilty for a period before AfD nominations which is of some respect. Unless the community increases the requirement for a specifically force non-vaguewave nominations, analyse and penalise accounts that swamp AfD or have unexplained high AfD nomination fail rates, or require those embarking on set of related article nominations to register for support at WikiProject level these issues will continue with multiple editors.
Djm-leighpark (
talk) 12:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
− Proposal: Close ANI with no action and no prejudice. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 12:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Support Please note these article have tagged by numerous editors (Over 10) they could not find sources after a normal search that is other than Authordom for notabilty and sources and some of the articles were tagged way back from 2012 almost all of them have been tagged atleast 6 months before they were brought to AFD the last one was tagged in June 2019 and the article at the time of nomination was in a poor state.Further here WP:BEFORE is tough for Deobandi pages as the sources are more likely be in Urdu language and Bengali language may be not be covered in the mainstream media atleast in India or Bangladesh hence WP:AGF to all the 10 who tagged the pages and those who nominate it.One is free to nomiate an article tagged for notablity or sources for years in the normal course of editing. WP:BURDEN applies here as well.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Article nom'd by for deletion requested to
WP:REFUNDed to draft for analysis
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
−
− − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − −
−
− |
− I've requested refund to draft for all article nominated for deletion by Authordom, I'd generally recommend not trying to get these restored to mainspace via DRV as its likely any that could be require movement to mainspace would require improvement first. Most of these will likely left go G13 following 6 months elapse. In addition T. G. Mohandas has re-incarnated. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 23:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
− @ Djm-leighpark:, I had participated in the AfD discussion of Mohammad Najeeb Qasmi and then I was not possibly aware about how it works, it was only my comment there which saved this article as a draft and also it was my first AfD comment. I am working on the draft though at Draft:Mohammad Najeeb Qasmi. If I had not commented, I do not think that there would have been its draft still intact or that Authordom had not made its way to deletion -- Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 11:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
"... Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or rejected Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator.Here there was participation in most of the debates have do not think Refund is applicable here in most cases. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 07:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Frankly I feel this discussion is changing into a 'fog' of statistitical analysis and we are getting far away from the REAL problem of some people using AfD India and AfD Pakistan as 'weapons for clean-up' of their perceived opponents' articles and get their work of hundreds-of-hours-of-editing-time deleted or go to waste. I have mentioned this above before in this discussion and I hope that's not being ignored? On this, I agree with User:Goldsztajn that it's becoming a case of 'missing the forest for the trees'. We are getting off-track in this discussion and getting away from the root cause of the problem – which is AfDs being used as weapons and clean-up forums by some people with their own personal agendas. Some people might suggest that then keep going to those forums and keep voting Keep to save your work? Some results are in front of us and are shown above. When it's so super-easy to bring targeted opponent's article to AfD for deletion by some nominators without even bothering to do the required WP:Before properly, and they don't even get in trouble for ignoring it. Then why not? In this highly cynical day and age and people not having enough time, they end up the winners even if they have partial success in hurting the opponent. In my observation and experience, these deletion nominators at least have partial success due to SOME people with 'deletionist frame of mind' roaming around with their 'deletionist pens' to quickly vote Delete rather than waste or spend their time in looking at the article and then coming back and voting. Not all only some people vote like that, in my view. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 19:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
Ngrewal1 I can understand your frustrations as feeling as having to spend too much time at (on defence) at AfD is mentally draining; and a five minute WP:VAGUEWAVE nomination could result in a multi-hour rescue. However the fact an article needs rescue often (not always) is because it is poorly sourced, cites poorly embellished (especially if non-English), and plain looks wrong, and not protected from link-rot. 90% of the time if it looks right and looks well sourced a WP:VAGUEWAVE nominator won't go near it. While I share your concern some people may be nominating articles relating to the Indian subcontinent on factional lines, and perhaps doing other stuff on the same basis, it is important not to cast allegations unless there is hard evidence. In the case of this ANI I see indicators that seem to me like they warrant further scrutiny. In all events I've just issued you with a Ds/alert reminder and quite frankly I'd pretty well possibly want to consider doing that for everyone in this discussion if I had time but I have to avoid incorrectly issuing any. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 08:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
−
"...apparently nominated in good faith, but were actually examples of an ongoing issue with Wikipedia. If this tendentious pattern can be confirmed, then we have good grounds to ban Authordom from nominating articles for deletion for an indefinite period."It would be helpful if we could focus on following up on that. Thank you,-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 15:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
−
− I have to raise another issue here. Nothing but about similarity of editing pattern of users MalayaliWoman, ArtsRescuer and Authordom. MalayaliWoman has been blocked on 20 April 2019 for sock puppetry. User ArtsRescuer too blocked for sock puppetry on 24 May 2016. Authordom registered on 09 July 2019, and started editing on 08 August 2019. Here I can list some similarities.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− There are behavior of adding multiple issue template in same pattern found. This also to be verified and action to be taken.-- Irshadpp ( talk) 22:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− @ Authordom: Near the start of this discussion you requested sources be required to support the concern which evolved around good faith concerns of a non-neutral possible Ahle Sunnat wa Jama'at/Barelvi agenda. Such an agenda would I believe be a breach of Wikipedia:5P2, namely "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". Goldsztajn has presented a series of AfD nominations you have made that that seem to align with that concern. I hope you can understand the concerns and as you have asked for sources/supporting evidence I would appreciate, as might others, your response to such concerns. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 22:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Hi, can anyone help me getting this discussion back? [
Possible issues with Authordom]. The discussion has not reached to its conclusion yet. Tagging associated editors:
Irshadpp,
Goldsztajn,
Ngrewal1 and
Djm-leighpark. Regards -
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (
talk) 20:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− from Wikipedia Teahouse
−
−
Hi, can anyone help me getting this discussion back? [
Possible issues with Authordom]. The discussion has not reached to its conclusion yet. Tagging associated editors:
Irshadpp,
Goldsztajn,
Ngrewal1 and
Djm-leighpark. Regards
−
− AaqibAnjum Looks like the ANI discussion we (5 above people) participated in is ONLY MOVED TO ARCHIVE FOR NOW without any Result Decision by the administrators. Aaqib, since you were the discussion starter or filer, my best guess is the Wikipedia administration should notify you first before any of us. Please be patient. In the meantime, thanks for sending me the alert. This is my first-ever ANI Discussion also. So I don't know more than you. I am thinking how can they leave the ANI Discussion unresolved? Let's wait for a day or two to see what we hear from them? Best Regards Ngrewal1 ( talk) 20:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− {{atopr
− | status =
− | result = Question asked, question answered. ( non-admin closure) —— SN 54129 09:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
− }}
−
−
−
−
Hi, can anyone help me getting this discussion back? [
Possible issues with Authordom]. The discussion has not reached to its conclusion yet. Tagging associated editors:
Irshadpp,
Goldsztajn,
Ngrewal1 and
Djm-leighpark. Regards -
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (
talk) 20:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
Just let it die is it your opinion or an administrative decision, @
NinjaRobotPirate:. How can a bot
move this discussion without a proper discussion or consensus. This move probably a mistake happened. Will you kill any discussion, just because of mass content. Why not understanding the history how this discussion became huge. Which is nothing but investment of many editors.
− Now if you are saying let it die it is a clear insult on those editors.-- Irshadpp ( talk) 04:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
|
−
−
−
Part of a Wikipedia help series on |
Wikipedia Awards |
---|
![]() |
|
Awarded by co-founder Jimmy Wales |
Awards by WikiProject |
Barnstars and other personal awards |
Awards by number of edits |
See also |
|
−
−
− Can anyone help me to archive my talk page? I have tried but there is something missing. want to do the archive Year wise. Jai49 ( talk) 12:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Promotional, fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO. The award received by him is third-highest honor which is not enough. Störm (talk) 11:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Non-notable businessman, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 12:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib ( talk) 11:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
References
−
−
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
−
−
− The Result was Delete
−
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
−
−
−
The more I look into this article the more I realize that Wikipedia is being misused for
WP:SELFPROMOTION. Previous AfD (
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Sehgal (3nd nomination)) had substantial support towards delete but it was the ignorance of the nominator (relative of the subject) which outweighed and ruined all sensible arguments.
−
−
Years have elapsed, to date there are no results of the subject on Google news or Google books. Entirely fails
WP:GNG.
Orientls (
talk) 15:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Your neutrality is visible, I found the real reason as you practiced in these diffs - and you attacked this subject--
1,
2
− 3,
− 4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 ( talk) 22:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− delete - as vote, not policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:89FB:EA86:2045:2220 ( talk) 05:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Your imagination amusing me as well, I copied and paste as those were posted - You only removed reliable sources to get the article deleted, edit history proves that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1c00:1604:bb00:459b:2ced:129e:aab0 ( talk • contribs)
−
−
Sources
|
---|
− DESiegel: These sources and nomination for deletion? - 3 times notable per GNG? − −
− −
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− |
−
−
−
−
−
−
he got war medal from pak army, does he paid for that? - or it is minor than indian film awards? - anyhow delete it as you want, not as policy. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:1C00:1604:BB00:89FB:EA86:2045:2220 (
talk) 16:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Note for administrators: none of the delete votes executes Wikipedia rules since that article 3 time has passed the notability, there are now 31 most reliable sources that are cited in the article, which nominators removed that, claiming the article is not notable. It is a totally illegitimate move of nominators. All delete votes should be considered as just voting without defining rules and reading sources, not as consensus as policies. I do not think, admins are blind, they are here to enforce policies, not personal motives of anyone else. I do not know the subject as you do not know. Since third deletion, fortuna, explained as, this and Mar4d as this, it was edited also as talk page archieve by Lady and Drmies two admins as well. Further more - Overzealous deletion - Myths and facts about deletion as Myth: AfD is a vote. More "keeps" means it'll be kept, and more "deletes" means it'll be deleted.
− Fact: The numbers of keeps and deletes do not decide the outcome. Entries that are simply votes are dismissed. The comments that reference policies, guidelines, and essays and state why they call for inclusion or exclusion are actually those that will determine the outcome.
− — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 ( talk) 18:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
It seems these users
User:MistyGraceWhite,
User:Hammad,
User:AaqibAnjum,
User:Orientls,
User:Saqib,
User:Störm fall under
− Meatpuppetry characteristically, because of editing on many articles together, and comenting and awarding on talk pages. It is not coincidental that they all are here with selected decision delete without internet connections for conspiracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 ( talk) 12:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
You all just victimized the article that passes GNG and Notability, whereas, I glanced articles which you created most of those entirely fail GNG as
this and professor of rules
User:Störm similarly enjoying the project to create
such kinds of articles trivial mentioned sources that completely fail GNG and come here to preach others the meaning of GNG - the article you blindly voted to delete, has been edited by the most experienced editors — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (
talk) 13:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
The way of convincing:
Such private movements create clear doubts and something not as the rules. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (
talk) 17:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The result was keep. Withdrawn.
(non-admin closure)
Störm
(talk) 01:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Unverified claims, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 08:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
− Keep Seems to me this article may be worth saving. Found many reliable sources to verify his claims including Business Recorder newspaper and Pakistan Today newspaper. Please allow time so the article can be improved. I am working on it right now. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 17:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
Hifz-ur-Rehman (died 1970) was a
Pakistani
archaeologist,
historian and
linguist.
−
−
"Hifz-ur-Rehman donated his life-long collection of nearly 1,500
antiquities to the
Lahore Museum, including three Quranic manuscripts of historical significance written by
Imam Hussain (grandson of the Islamic prophet
Muhammad), many decrees, Chinese porcelain, rare coins, glass objects, miniatures, ivory objects and specimens of
calligraphy and
Islamic art objects".
−
−
Nearly 40 years after his death, his dedication and service was appreciated and he was awarded by the President of Pakistan in 2011.
− Ngrewal1 ( talk) 16:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
−
− Keep This article seems to have historical and religious significance. NBajwa1 ( talk) 22:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC) — NBajwa1 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 02:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Asalamualaikum brother, I don't know why you mentioned me in this conversation subjected above.
−
−
I am new. Can you please elaborate things what are that?
−
−
Kya mujhse koi mistake huwi ha kahi????
TheChunky (
talk) 09:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
I saw that you are adopting new user. I have also added Adopt me tag on my userpage.
−
−
Can you help me in learning Wikipedia. I don't know how to add tags to get adopted.
TheChunky (
talk) 10:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
What to do now? Do we get connected here or we connect on social media? Or something else?
TheChunky (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 10:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
– A user has requested
CheckUser. An
SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The master is a newbie (joined in April) and sock joined only few days back. Both have Afded my articles which I am counting below.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (
talk) 09:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The master is a newbie (joined in April) and sock joined only few days back. Both have Afded my articles which I am counting below.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (
talk) 09:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
−
−
−
−
−
−
− − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − −
Editor
− |
Time and date
− |
User talk page
− |
Edit summary
− |
Contributions by the user whose talk page was written on
− |
Number of contributions
− |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Numan765 | 11:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:KGFT785 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/KGFT785 | 477
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Jesuisunovni | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Jesuisunovni | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Eb Maakun | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Eb Maakun | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Alzeha | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Alzeha | 1
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Amar c malusare | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Amar c malusare | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Mnojpacemaker | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Mnojpacemaker | 2
− |
Numan765 | 11:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Tanatan123 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Tanatan123 | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Aashi anjan | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Aashi anjan | 1
− |
Numan765 | 11:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:MrJaviR | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/MrJaviR | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Jammyboy465 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Jammyboy465 | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Chelsea5737 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Chelsea5737 | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Marassi bahrain | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Marassi bahrain | 11
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Ithal Sn | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Ithal Sn | 1
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Anurag8077 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Anurag8077 | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Bjpindian | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Bjpindian | 2
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:P3ngoxlonton | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/P3ngoxlonton | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Concionator | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Concionator | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:PresqueHumain | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/PresqueHumain | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:C-Siccness Cole | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/C-Siccness Cole | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:SunSOG | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/SunSOG | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Mohammed Mutaher Hossain | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Mohammed Mutaher Hossain | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Rajiv2511 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Rajiv2511 | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:MarioMarioMarioMario | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/MarioMarioMarioMario | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Pabalter | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Pabalter | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Fvaro | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Fvaro | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Britneys127 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Britneys127 | 6
− |
KST981 | 08:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:HelloIamyourfriend | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/HelloIamyourfriend | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:TheNoob 2020 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/TheNoob 2020 | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Beiker71 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Beiker71 | 1
− |
KST981 | 08:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:JoJoStalin1924 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/JoJoStalin1924 | 0
− |
− -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
− This case is being reviewed by RoySmith as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case (including admin actions against suspected socks) without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
no substantial edits by others. That would be unusual for an AfD, but if you know of any specific examples, let me know and I'll take a look. Feel free to annotate any non-G5-eligible AfDs with a link to this SPI, however. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
−
The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 15:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable record label, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 14:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 22:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
non notable actress. Fails WP:GNG, Fails WP:NACTOR Numan765 ( talk) 10:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
*Delete Small role in non notable movies. Fails
WP:GNG.
KST981 (
talk) 09:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
GEM COMMENT above by - Toddy1 about HARD TO FIND references FROM the PAST. 18 June 2020
FOR MOWAHID MOHSIN
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rind Khan, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 05:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for you help Mowahid Mohsin ( talk) 06:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Mian Sheheryar (1928 – 9 January 2011) was a Pakistani television and film music composer.
Mian Sheheryar was born in Lahore, Punjab, British India in 1928. [1]
He joined the Pakistani television at its Lahore center since its inception in 1964, stayed with it and worked there for over 40 years until his death in 2011. He is credited with introducing many singers – Naseem Begum (only on PTV - Ghulam Ahmed Chishti had already introduced her in film Guddi Gudda (1956)), classical music and ghazal singer Hamid Ali Khan, Irene Perveen, folk singer Iqbal Bahu, Shabnam Majeed and Hadiqa Kiani. All these singers he introduced, as we know now, achieved success later in the Pakistani film industry and television. [1]
Song | Singer | Lyricist | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Nainon Mein Jal Bhar Aaye, Rooth Gaya Mera Pyar | Naseem Begum | Mushir Kazmi | Film Begunah (1958) |
Aei Watan Kay Sajeelay Jawano, Mere Naghme Tumhare Liye Hein [1] | Noor Jehan | Jamiluddin Aali | A highly popular song from the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 |
Qaseeda Burda Sharif or Qaṣīda al-Burda (Poem of the Mantle), in praise of Prophet Muhammad | Humera Arshad, Fariha Pervez and singer Khurshid Anwar | Imam Sharfuddin Al-Busiri | A Pakistan Television Corporation production |
Mian Sheheryar died in his hometown Lahore, Pakistan at the Shalamar Hospital on 9 January 2011 at the age of 84. Some of his PTV colleagues including PTV's Lahore general Manager Farrukh Bashir, former PTV producer Mushtaq Sufi and music critic/newspaper columnist Amjad Parvez attended his funeral. [1]
To edit, please
log in.
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ... discospinster talk 01:54, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Islamic Barnstar | |
Thanks for your contribution for all the Islamic Topics. Keep up the good Job.
Oniongas (
talk) 11:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
|
![]() |
![]() | |
Awarded to ?. for his awesome hard work towards Pakistan location articles. Your contribution to wikipedia in this area is greatly appreciated. I've been browsing and we owe you at least a lot of credit and respect for your efforts at starting articles like Abbottabad Tehsil. |
Location | Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan |
---|---|
Opening | 19 March 1975 |
Website |
dhalahore |
Companies | |
Owner | Pakistan Army |
The Defence Housing Authority, Lahore (DHA Lahore) ( Urdu: اختیاریہَ دفاعی اقامت کاری ، لاہور) is a housing society located in Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. DHA's initial phase was built for army officers and their families (as Civil & Defence Officers Cooperative Housing Society and later as Lahore Cantonment Cooperative Housing Society - LCCHS), however, now it serves to both retired military officers and civil population of city as it mainly is a private commercial housing scheme operating under the Pakistan Army. [1] [2] [3]
The area has also undergone extensive gentrification, bringing in a more wealthy base. The recent influx of population from the adjoining cities.
During the past years, developers have acquired surrounding land, which has increased new development in the area. New developments include a world-class golf resort in partnership with Bandar Raya Developments of Malaysia in Phase 6 of DHA and a shopping and office complex in partnership with Global Haly of the United Kingdom in Phase 2 of DHA.
DHA encompasses two famous shopping centres, known as the 'Y-block' market and the 'H-block' market. DHA Y Block also has a sports club, gym, a large commercial swimming pool and other sports facilities for the community. DHA Lahore main office was also located at Phase III, Sector Y but the management has decided to relocate the office at Phase VI, Sector A, just to accommodate number of people, who visit office on daily basis. There are other smaller commercial markets in DHA- like T block which has many cafes - like Hot spot, Jammin - Java and various other salons. T block commercial area also has the first swimming pool & spa equipment display center called Olympic Pool.
Two international standard sports complexes have been planned in the area and construction has started on the projects as of 2011.
Currently, DHA has nine phases, from phase 1 to phase 9 that are open for possession of the civilian population. The remaining two phases, from phase 10 to 11 in the process of extensive development. Each phase has a number of sectors or blocks having English alphabets as their names which are further subdivided into plots for the construction of houses ranging from the land area five marla (approx. 1361 square feet) to 2 Kanals (approx. 10890 square feet). Each phase also has a central commercial area for shops and offices catering to the community. The phases of the most construction and population are the Phases 1 to 6, with Phase 7,8 and 9 being scarcely populated. The overall plan of Phases 1 to 4 displays an older style of town development with narrower roads, streets and grassy areas, also without underground wiring for electrification, while also lacking sector mosques. Phase 5,6 and 7 being the most recent in terms of planning and development show sixty feet roads as well as broader streets, with underground electrification and each sector or block having its own mosque. [4] [5]
Defence is divided into 10 subdivisions (or phases), which each phase being subdivided further into blocks. Each phase also has a central commercial area to cater to the local community. Housing construction began from Defence I and proliferated east and south towards what is today Defence VII. The remaining four phases (Defence VIII, IX, XI, XII) are currently under development. Housing plots range from five marla (approx. 1361 square feet) to 2 kanals (approx. 10890 square feet). The central headquarters was originally located in Defence III, Sector Y but relocated to Defence VI, Sector A to accommodate more residents in the neighbourhood. [6]
Phase | Sectors |
---|---|
Defence I | |
Defence II | |
Defence III | |
Defence IV | |
Defence V | |
Defence VI | |
Defence VII | |
Defence VIII | Under development |
Defence IX | Under development |
Defence XI | Known locally as Defence Rahbar |
Defence XII | Known locally as Defence EME |
The main hospital situated in the heart of DHA is The National Hospital. Alternative hospitals within easy reach of DHA can be found on the Defence Main Boulevard (the road leading to the main DHA entrance). In addition to the hospitals, small clinics can be found in markets all over. Many pharmacies can also be found scattered throughout DHA, Lahore. Government of Punjab, Pakistan tries to take preventive measures every year to control the Dengue virus spread throughout Lahore city area including DHA, Lahore. [7]
Dear Saqib,
I hope you doing well,
It has been observed that you have been nominating my articles for invalid deletion, brother I would like to clarify whats the matter as you have nominated invalid article delectation, I told you earlier as well, lets work together to improve WP:Pakistan as team as others are working why you dont understand? lets talk and solve our matters as you are not reading articles and nominating for deleting and instead of adding citations or improvement request you are just adding invalid deleting invalid templates, lets work together and improve for betterment of Wikipedia and those article which you feel require improvement we can improve them as I always take my all articles as responsibility and its our responsibility to improve articles.
I will also help to improve your articles by adding citations which I already did in past, but you always act negatively which count under WP:NPA policy.
Let me know, if we can be friends, and wish you Happy HOLY MONTH OF RAMADAN & LAIL UL QADIR
JAZAKALLAH Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 21:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to
103.151.0.166 while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being
blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's
policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your
IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
|
* Baba Alam Siahposh
− − − − −
− |
− − − − − − − −
− |
−
−
−
− If you don't have time to fix citations/references at the moment, you can still help by tagging the article so that others can find and fix them.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Hello again,
− Just wondering...how do you archive your personal talk page? I tried following the steps as noted, but they seem really confusing to me. Thank you. -- PAKHIGHWAY ( talk) 22:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Saqib, first you deserve credit for creating this article on 21 January 2017. All I did yesterday was to try to expand it a little bit with a reference to a recognized solid business news website Bloomberg.com. I am trying to be courteous to you, rather than revert you as you did to me, and first ask you a question on your Talk page here. I am just curious as to why you removed some of my added lines when they are clearly backed up by Bloomberg.com website. For example, Bloomberg.com website says that he is a "Director of Pakistan Business Council from 2013 – present" and also the Chairman of Descon Limited. In case you were in a hurry and did not click on the Bloomberg.com website link 'Read Full Background' given below the 'Partial Profile Background' shown on their website, then you apparently missed seeing those extra lines that I am talking about? By the way, I do remember you fixing one of my Dawn (newspaper) links for me couple of months ago and I did appreciate your help (it was my fault and all of us make mistakes occasionally). I am just asking you to take another look at Bloomberg.com website's Profile of Abdul Razak Dawood. Thanks Ngrewal1 ( talk) 17:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
−
−
−
![]() | This
user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this
user page
has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{
in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was
last edited by
Ngrewal1 (
talk |
contribs) 2 months ago. (
Update timer) |
−
![]() | This
user page is actively undergoing a
major edit for a little while. To help avoid
edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed. This page was last edited at 23:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) (2 months ago) – this estimate is cached, . Please remove this template if this page hasn't been edited for a significant time. If you are the editor who added this template, please be sure to remove it or replace it with {{ Under construction}} between editing sessions. |
−
![]() | This
user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this
user page
has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{
in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was
last edited by
Ngrewal1 (
talk |
contribs) 2 months ago. (
Update timer) |
−
−
−
− /info/en/?search=User_talk:Bhadani/Archive1 MARHOOM BHADANI TALK page ARCHIVES 2018
−
−
− {{sidebar with collapsible lists
− | name = History of Pakistan
− | bodyclass = vcard
− | wraplinks = true
− | title = {{region history sidebar title
−
|region = Pakistan
−
|image =
− }}
− |liststyle = background:#iee;text-align:left;
− |listclass = nowrap
−
−
|list1title = Ancient
− |list1 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− | list2title = Classical
− | list2 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− | list3title = Medieval
− | list3 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− | list4title = Modern
− | list4 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− | list5title = Related articles
− | list5 =
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− }}
−
−
For infobox use:
− caption = The Map of Line of Control
−
−
File:− | |
Company type | Public corporation − |
---|---|
Industry |
Textile industry Energy development International trading − |
Founded | 1972 | −
Headquarters |
Lahore
− ,
Pakistan
− |
Key people | Inam Ellahi Shaikh Shaukat Ellahi Shaikh [1] Shafqat Ellahi Shaikh − |
Revenue | ![]() $100 million USD ( FY 2006) − |
Website |
www |
−
−
Nagina Group is a Pakistani
conglomerate company which is based in
Lahore,
Pakistan. It manufactures a wide variety of
textile products.
−
−
The company was founded in 1972 by Inam Ellahi Shaikh and Ashan Ellahi Shaikh. Nagina Cotton/Yarns (a subsidiary of Nagina Group) was listed by
Forbes magazine as among the best-performing-companies with less than US $1 billion in revenue in 2003.
[2]
[1]
[3]
−
−
− The Nagina Group began as a single company, Nagina Mills Limited, established by Shaikh Inam Ellahi and Ashan Ellahi Shaikh in 1967. [4] Focusing on the production of cotton yarn, it grew with the acquisition of tanneries, factories that produced shoes and ice, and Pakistan's largest jute mill. These assets were lost, however, when East Pakistan separated from the Pakistani Federation to become Bangladesh in 1971. In 2006, Managing Director of Nagina Group, Shafqat Ellahi Shaikh was elected Chairman of All Pakistan Textile Mills Association. [5]
−
−
− The company restructured itself in 1972 as the Nagina Group, consolidating its assets under a single umbrella organization.
−
−
The group currently manages these subsidiaries:
−
− (Note: All the stock exchanges in Pakistan – Karachi Stock Exchange, Lahore Stock Exchange and Islamabad Stock Exchange were merged into Pakistan Stock Exchange on 11 January 2016. So the old and modified company trading symbols on all financial websites may not be updated yet)
−
−
−
−
−
−
Nagina Group also operates three private
power plants to provide electricity for its mills. The installed capacity of its generators is 30.57
Megawatts. Excess energy is sold to other industrial facilities in the area.
−
−
Nagina Cotton Mills Limited is the flagship company of the Group, established in 1967. The company operates spinning machinery comprising 47,040 spindles with related textile processing machines. In 2014, the Managing Director and CEO of Nagina Group was optimistic about his companies " future business prospects for exports to the European markets."
[11]
−
−
Nagina Group is active in the textile and cotton spinning, weaving, energy, real estate, and trading sectors in Pakistan.
[3]
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− No progress from previous AfD, no new sources found. Fails to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Those already present are not WP:RS as many are directory listings. Störm (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Dear GorgCustersSabre, as a fellow Wikipedian and a fellow Muslim, I am asking you to re-consider your REVERT of my work on Sulaiman Nadvi. I spent some hours gathering information first and then many hours doing the actual editing work. I have been editing Wikipedia for 6 years now, so please don't treat me like a new guy. I also fully realize that you have been on Wikipedia longer than me. You should know and recall that I have NEVER REVERTED your work over these 6 years even though it only takes a few seconds to do so and it's so CONVENIENT! It has been my choice not to adopt a supervising and monitoring role on Wikipedia. My Wikipedia contributions over 6 years have been mainly Islam-related (mostly Muslim personalities) and Pakistan-related, and I believe supervising and monitoring other people's work is also badly needed on Wikipedia since it's the 5th largest website worldwide for daily internet traffic. All kinds of disruptors and vandals need to be stopped also. So both roles, yours and mine, are needed.
−
−
Back to Sulaiman Nadvi, I had fixed and updated all the references. To my surprise, even the reliable Dawn newspaper reference was dead. So I searched for and replaced it with their NEW website for the same title, Myths about Urdu. With the reverted Sulaiman Nadvi article, as it is now, Dawn reference and salaam.co.uk references are dead now! Also Pakistan Post Office issued 'Pioneers of Freedom' commemorative postage stamp material and reference is gone for Sulaiman Nadvi and
− is deleted which he definitely deserves to have. Sadly, Pakistan Post Office does not maintain its website going back to 1992. So one has no choice but to use other available websites. Please make suggestions here or on my Talk page...Revert is not the only way to go. Either one of us can make the article better, hopefully. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 19:59, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Umrao Bundu Khan (1915 - 1970) was a Pakistani sarangi player.
[1]
−
−
− Khan was born in 1970 to renowned sarangi player Bundu Khan. He learned vocal music from his uncle Chand Khan, a lagend of the Delhi Gharana.
−
−
− In 1970 Khan emigrated to Pakistan. He was a staff artist at All India Radio and was also a performed at Radio Pakistan. In 1954 he was invited to Akhil Bharatiya Khadi Pradarshini in Karachi, where he gave many concerts. He performed in Pakistan as well as in other countries. Khan was also a versatile singer, who sang mostly khayal, thumri, dadra, tarana, qaul and kalbana. [2] [3]
−
−
− Khan died in 1970 at the age of 55 in Karachi [4]
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− ZOOMABLE GOOGLE MAP OF PAKISTAN AND INDIA - expands and shrinks to show all details of cities. Left double-click MINUS AND PLUS on the small BAR on the MAP to zoom in and out.
−
−
Baitul Mukarram
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7] Masjid in Urdu (بیت ال مکرّم)
[8]
[9] is the second largest mosque of Karachi , it is located in Block 17
Gulshan e Iqbal ,
Karachi. It is near
Urdu University and
Expo Center Karachi.
−
−
Baitul Mukarram | |
---|---|
Location | |
Location | Gulshan Iqbal Karachi |
Geographic coordinates | 24°54′27″N 67°04′58″E / 24.9073634°N 67.0827195°E |
−
−
− Baitul Mukarram Masjid [10] has an Islamic educational institute within the mosque, where students can get Islamic education.
−
−
From the published pictures of the mosque, it looks clean , large and beautiful and it is under the administration of
Darul Uloom Karachi. Large number of people come in this mosque to attend the
Marriage in Islam ceremony or
Nikkah ceremony of their loved ones. Amir Shahab was a 'Khateeb' ('Administrator') of this mosque but he was shot dead by unknown terrorists near Nipa Chowrangi ,
Karachi on 22 March 2019, Mufti
Muhammad Taqi Usmani was with Amir Shahab but Mufti Taqi Usmani survived the attack.
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15].
−
−
−
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
−
−
−
−
− Warning: Default sort key "Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi)" overrides earlier default sort key "Umrao Bundu Khan".
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Unrelated coverage/references. Nothing notable in reliable sources. Fails WP:NORG. Störm (talk) 07:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) ) has mentioned Bait ul mukarram masjid karachi.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 09:44, 4 December 2019 (UTC)−
−
−
−
−
−
Hi i could to it better if its not deleted i will add 5 references but they are in urdu language. BBC urdu ( سہیل, ریاض (22 March 2019).
"مفتی تقی عثمانی قاتلانہ حملے میں بال بال بچ گئے". Retrieved 4 December 2019. ) has also passing mention of bait ul mukarram masjid but in urdu. i have also mentioned in article that mufti taqi usmani is amir of mosque also mufti shahab.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 15:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
After bbc urdu i have added two more references one is from urdu magazine talking about bait ul mukarram masjid and surrounding and one from urdu news website. any urdu editors are welcome to check :)
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 15:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Comment - Most of the coverage is only helpful to verify the mosque, but still no sources verify the claim of 'second-largest mosque'. Still fails WP:SIGCOV. Störm (talk) 09:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
Hi This is the offical website of Darul uloom karachi and they have mentioned about "bait ul mukarram masjid" they are explaining when the mosque was built and on how many acres and students get islamic education and many other details:
"جامع مسجد دارالعلوم کراچی | جامعہ دارالعلوم کراچی" (in Urdu). Retrieved 6 December 2019.. --
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 08:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
Its 9th day completed and 10th day is started so can someone delete this tag ? as it has all the information updated and i will occasionally update more.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 17:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 22:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi)−
−
−
−
−
−
I have added few references and will add more in urdu too , the article is ok and have enough references now.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 08:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 14:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
This is government of karachi website and its in english passing mosque
[1] also i am adding few more references.
Memon KutianaWala (
talk) 14:25, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Dormant since 2011. Weak coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:NWEB. Störm (talk) 19:41, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 ( talk) 01:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Hope this helps. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 18:54, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistaniat
−
−
Pakistaniat: All Things Pakistan is a
blog launched in 2006 by editor
Adil Najam about cultural and political issues in
Pakistan. It has been widely cited in both the Pakistani and Indian press, such as
Dawn (newspaper) and
Outlook (Indian magazine), and international newspapers and radio stations such as
The Guardian and the U.S.
National Public Radio.
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
PAY ATTENTION, USEFUL LINKS FOR YOU IN THE FOLLOWING Chowk.com:
−
−
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− No significant coverage in WP:RS. Poor Alexa rank. Fails WP:NWEB. Defunct website. Störm (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
While notability itself is not temporary, from time to time a reassessment of the evidence of notability or suitability of existing articles may be requested by any user via a deletion discussion. This article needs to demonstrate notability per WP:NWEB, WP:NCORP, WP:GNG or some other applicable notability guideline. So far this is lacking, however a single participant arguing delete is also not a consensus.
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 ( talk) 03:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)− @ Barkeep49: Am I the only git idiot enough or maybe with the nous enough to sort through dead links and bring existing sources to this site? I've done the minimum on the article to switch on url-status=dead where necessary. Can you please do a temp-undelete on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chowk.com (2nd nomination) for me, it almost certainly contains nothing useful but I'd like to know the page creator anyway. I'll sift through the existing AfD sources over the weekend as no one else can be arsed to do it. There's also a little precedents news sites in tricky areas are sometimes given a little slack by the community. Tough luck at WP:ARBCOM. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 11:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Djm-leighpark, my rule of thumb is I make one administrative action per AfD. Since I relisted I will leave it to another sysop to close. However, I will note while there is no minimum length of time after a relist to close, they normally get closed a week or so after relisting so it probably won't be until then. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
−
−
![]() | The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's
general notability guideline. (January 2019) |
−
−
![]() |
−
Muhammad Rafi Usmani محمد رفیع عثمانی − | |
---|---|
3rd President of Darul Uloom Karachi − | |
In office Assumed office 1986 − | |
Preceded by | − |
2nd Mufti of Darul Uloom Karachi − | |
In office In office 1976 − | |
Preceded by | − |
Personal | |
Born |
Deoband
− | July 21, 1936
−
Religion | Islam − |
Denomination | Sunni Islam − |
Jurisprudence | − |
Movement | Deobandi − |
Alma mater | − |
−
−
Muhammad Rafi Usmani (
Urdu: محمد رفیع عثمانی, Muḥammad Rafī‘ Us̱mānī) is a
Pakistani
Sunni
Islamic scholar who serves as President of
Darul Uloom Karachi, the largest seminary or religious institution in the city of
Karachi, Pakistan.
[1]
[2]
−
−
Muhammad Rafi Usmani (
Urdu: محمد رفیع عثمانی, Muḥammad Rafī‘ Us̱mānī) is a
Pakistani
Sunni
Islamic scholar who serves as President of
Darul Uloom Karachi, the largest seminary or religious institution in the city of
Karachi, Pakistan.
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
−
−
− Rafi Usmani was born on 21 July 1936 at Deoband, Uttar Pradesh, British India. [8]
− Rafi Usmani has been a Grand Mufti of Pakistan and the elder brother of another noted Grand Mufti of Pakistan, Mufti Taqi Usmani. Both brothers are the sons of Muhammad Shafi Usmani, the founder of Darul Uloom Karachi in 1951. [9] [8]
−
−
−
− On 16 January 2018, a historic fatwa (a religious decree or opinion) was issued by religious scholars of many schools of thought to fight global terrorism, extremism and sectarianism. The fatwa was drafted by means of consultative process among most prominent religious scholars in Pakistan. This decree was jointly termed as Paigham-i-Pakistan (Message of Pakistan) and unveiled at an official event by the President of Pakistan, Interior Minister of Pakistan and the Foreign Minister of Pakistan. At this event, the government wanted to try to make it clear to the entire world that most Islamic religious scholars and the government of Pakistan are united against terrorism, extremism and sectarianism. "The fatwa will provide a platform for national unity..." The interior minister said while addressing the gathering. [10]
−
−
Speaking to
Associated Press of Pakistan (APP) news agency, Mufti Rafi Usmani described the unveiling of the fatwa as a historic event in Pakistan. He explained that Islamic scholars from all sects had considered and discussed each word in the 'fatwa document' for months before finally announcing it.
[10]
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
goodreads
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).−
−
−
−
−
Warning: Default sort key "Usmani, Muhammad Rafi" overrides earlier default sort key "Baitul Mukarram Masjid (Karachi)".
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The result was keep.
(non-admin closure)
Störm
(talk) 09:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Non notable Deobandi seminary. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 20:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
− Keep Jamia Darul Uloom, Karachi, Pakistan is one of the largest university and institution for religious education in the city of Karachi. This article is much improved now. It now has references from two major Pakistani newspapers and two international news websites – Dawn (newspaper), The News International, Arab News, The 500 Most Influential Muslims ( The Muslim 500). Ngrewal1 ( talk) 16:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidh e 01:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)− Keep Jamia Darul Uloom, Karachi, Pakistan is notable.16:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Night fury 11:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)− Keep No evidence of BEFORE; nomination is simply an assertion. One of the main Islamic seminaries of Pakistan. UCS. -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 23:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The result was keep. Asad Madni was a Member of Parliament as per the source mentioned in the article:
https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/pre_member/1952_2003/m.pdf
(non-admin closure)
❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁
(❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 02:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Non notable Islamist scholar and politician from India. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 08:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Your closure at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/As'ad_Madani was incorrect. As the nominator you must withdraw the nomination, you cannot close the nomination as you are an involved party. Please revert your edit and follow the correct proceedure for withdrawal, which is outlined here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal). In future with any article you choose to nominate for deletion, please ensure you effectively undertake WP:BEFORE – in particular carrying out actions described in D1. Thank you.-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 09:11, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Hi - just a small heads up, while the effect is the same, in these cases the more accurate procedure is withdrawal, rather than closure. See:
Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal). Regards,--
Goldsztajn (
talk) 10:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
You filed two reports at
WP:SPI, each with no evidence. In one I've asked you to provide evidence. I deleted the other. These filings are disruptive. If you do it again, you risk being blocked.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 18:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Dear wikipedia user,
− I have noticed that you have your own interests in wikipedia, and you contribute well to the related articles. Congratulations. Sharing your knowledge in a particular field to the world is the very core thing every wikipedian should have. But the very basic principle is that nobody in the world is perfect. If you present something before a community (whether online or offline), you ma== SPIs ==
−
−
You filed two reports at
WP:SPI, each with no evidence. In one I've asked you to provide evidence. I deleted the other. These filings are disruptive. If you do it again, you risk being blocked.--
Bbb23 (
talk) 18:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
− y be challenged, you may be questioned, somebody may request fact check, and somebody with the authority may take the action if you are wrong. You have to accept all those because you have the responsibility of the knowledge you share to others. I've noticed that you opened a sock puppet investgation on me and another unrelated user without valid evidence, just because you didn't like the edits these two random users made to your favorite topics. You couldn't revert those edits, you couldn't challenge those edits, because they were almost genuine, so you called for a sockpuppet investgation. This behaviour so disruptive and a good wikipedian shouldn't do this. So I'll watch all your future contributions to find any misbehaviour like this, and you'll be corrected or reported.
− Thank you.
− Sneha Raphael SnehaRaphael1996 ( talk) 23:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
The result was keep.
(non-admin closure)
Störm
(talk) 06:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− No coverage found. Fails WP:NPROF. Störm (talk) 07:49, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
In a Memorial reference on 26 November 2002, Dr. Badruddin Soomro, Chairman PARC, Islamabad announced that the Institute of Agriculture Biotechnology and Genetics Research (IABGR) NARC/PARC, Islamabad has been renamed after Dr. Azra Quraishi", I can't find evidence of this renaming (it might have been renamed again - a lot can happen in 18 years!) Pam D 15:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
− To GeorgeCustersSabre
−
Please leave it alone, when you can see I am still editing it. I placed a
![]() | This
user page is actively undergoing a
major edit for a little while. To help avoid
edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed. This page was last edited at 23:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC) (2 months ago) – this estimate is cached, . Please remove this template if this page hasn't been edited for a significant time. If you are the editor who added this template, please be sure to remove it or replace it with {{ Under construction}} between editing sessions. |
tag on it now. If I start doing that to you back, I am sure you won't like it because we will have Edit Conflicts and lose work this way back and forth. So there is no need to irritate each other. Thanks Ngrewal1 ( talk) 19:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots 20:44, 21 February 2020 (UTC)−
−
−
− I noticed that you stated "I am trying to be in PR business for celebrities and this is a part of it." Please read WP:Paid-contribution disclosure to learn about the restrictions and requirements should you engage in editing Wikipedia on behalf of a company or client. Schazjmd (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC) vs GorgeCustersSabre
−
−
−
−
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to
Grand Mufti, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors
do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —
Hammad
(Talk!) 10:52, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Hi - just a small heads up, while the effect is the same, in these cases the more accurate procedure is withdrawal, rather than closure. See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Procedure_for_non-administrator_close_(nominator_withdrawal). Regards,-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 10:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
− Hi, please read WP:Overtagging as in most cases the two most important tags are sufficient, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
− Greetings and my Salaams. This is a checkuser request to you for User:Authordom (old ID - User:Kutyava). I have been editing Wikipedia since 2012 and never have made this kind of request or even a minor complaint to any other Wikipedia administrators against anyone in my 7 years history of editing. Since you are an administrator, you can verify this from my Wikipedia records and history. But this person has pushed me over the edge. Seems to me - he is systematically and cleverly targeting all Islamic religious groups or sects other than his own religious group in South India, headed by Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar. From all his Deletion Nominations both on AfD India and AfD Pakistan within last couple months, you can see his pattern of nominations and draw your conclusions. Personally I have never retaliated against him and have never nominated even a SINGLE Wiki article for deletion - religious or non-religious....period! So you can also verify this that I have not provoked him. For example, please just pick up Maulana Asad Madani's nomination by him which resulted as ('Result:Keep') on 12 March 2020. * Asad Madani Ngrewal1 ( talk) 01:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
− Could you let me know what areas need to be worked on? I know the categories are missing? Because I still cant understand why the article is not accepted even though its resources are very strong links and credible sources.-- Salut65 ( talk) 11:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Welfare Party of India. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Flix11 (
talk) 09:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Muhammad (Karakunnu), without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. In
this edit summary, you wrote "Ask for citation, not to remove instantly". Please note that per
WP:ONUS - the responsibility is on you to provide the citations, not the other way around. Hence, the content that you have added -- without citations -- has been removed. —
MelbourneStar☆
talk 11:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC) about
User:Irshadpp
−
−
−
−
Tip of the day...
Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia
Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia is a list of insights about Wikipedia specifically targeted at people who have limited or no prior experience with the project (such as journalists, new editors, and new readers). These explanations should not surprise experienced editors but will hopefully help the rest of the world to shape an informed opinion of our work. – – To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{
totd3}}
|
−
−
−
−
− Hey, I've filled a report against Authordom at intervention against vandalism. He has been nominating notable Deobandi pages, possibly non-Barelwi pages for deletion, and recently the likes of Asad Madni and Darul Uloom Karachi, and thus misusing this feature. He has been spamming the Grand Mufti page also. He seems to look like owner of any Wikipedia page, who regards every verified edit by others as non-notable because the Mufti is not Barelwi possibly. Can someone block him from editing? - Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 11:02, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
− @ Authordom:, I saw you nominating notable Deobandi pages recently for deletion, that's not right thing. You could've added more references tag rather, Mufti Rafi Usmani or Darul Uloom Karachi etc are internationally well-known, their notability can't be questioned. If we have articles in stub quality, isn't it better for us to improve them? You can ask others for improvements. I think that directly tagging any notable article for deletion is not right, until one makes proper research on the subject. You could've recently improved Asad Madni, but besides notability, you regarded him as non-notable. If those who had voted, have had not researched on the subject, the page would've been no more, because of your nomination. Right, you follow AfD rules and you've right to nominate any article for deletion. But before it, cleanup, improve tags may be concerned. Hope you get my points. Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 11:41, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Thanks to everyone who has given this issue a good eye. The user is misusing the AfD and portraying bias through it. Reading all from Goldsztajn and Llywrch, I think it is enough time to block Authordom from nominating articles for deletion. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 14:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
− − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − −
− |
Date
− |
Article at AfD
− |
Authordom's claim in full for deletion
− |
Deobandi -
− related − |
Comment
− |
Result
− |
Review?
− |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
− |
22.03
− |
IslamOnline
− |
"Non notable Muslim Brotherhood linked website."
− |
![]() − |
Redirect to
Yusuf al-Qaradawi would possibly be more appropriate action.
− |
Not closed yet
− |
—
− |
2
− |
18.03
− |
Jamiatul Qasim Darul Uloom Al-Islamiah
− |
"Non notable Islamist seminary in India."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
Not closed yet
− |
—
− |
3
− |
18.03
− |
Madrasatul Islah
− |
"Non notable Islamic seminary."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE carried out. I !voted Keep, founded by notable scholars, produced notable scholars
− |
Not closed yet
− |
—
− |
4
− |
11.03
− |
Asad Madni
− |
"Non notable Islamist scholar and politician from India."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE carried out. Elected politician, easily verifiable.
− |
KEEP*
− |
![]() − |
5
− |
11.03
− |
Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions
− |
"The organization does not seem notable. But its founders are notable."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; notability easily verifiable
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
6
− |
11.03
− |
Union of Catholic Asian News
− |
"I think it is a non notable news portal."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; notability easily verifiable
− |
SNOW KEEP
− |
![]() − |
7
− |
10.03
− |
Muhammad Rafi Usmani
− |
"Non notable Islamist from Pakistan."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE;notability easily verifiable
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
8
− |
24.02
− |
Muhammad Saad Kandhlawi
− |
"Non notable Indian religious scholar."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE;notability easily verifiable
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
9
− |
24.02
− |
Maulana Zubair ul Hassan
− |
"Non notable
Tablighi Jamaat worker"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; notability easily verifiable
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
10
− |
24.02
− |
Muhammad Talha Kandhlawi
− |
"Nominating for speedy deletion, non notable."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE carried out. A proposed merger with
Muhammad Zakariyya al-Kandhlawi would possibly be more appropriate
− |
Not closed yet
− |
—
− |
11
− |
24.02
− |
Iftikhar-ul-Hasan Kandhlawi
− |
"Non notable Indian Islamic scholar."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
12
− |
24.02
− |
Inamul Hasan Kandhlawi
− |
"Non notable Muslim scholar from India."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
13
− |
23.02
− |
Madrasah Islamiah
− |
"Non notable article about a Deobandi school."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
14
− |
23.02
− |
Jamia Darul Uloom, Karachi
− |
"Non notable Deobandi seminary."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
KEEP
− |
![]() − |
15
− |
23.02
− |
Jamiah Farooqia, Karachi
− |
"Non notable Islamist seminary"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
16
− |
23.02
− |
Jamiatur Rasheed, Karachi
− |
"Non Notable seminary."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
17
− |
23.02
− |
Ahsan-Ul-Uloom
− |
"Non notable Islamist seminary"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
18
− |
19.02
− |
Ideal Relief Wing Kerala
− |
"Non notable charitable NGO managed by the
Jamaat-e-Islami Kerala chapter."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
19
− |
18.02
− |
Madrasah as-Sawlatiyah
− |
"No scope to keep, because unable to pass even the
WP:GNG."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
KEEP*
− |
![]() − |
20
− |
18.02
− |
Jamia Khair-ul-Madaris
− |
"Non notable."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; academic study on history of the school.
[3]
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
21
− |
18.02
− |
Madrasa Mifthahul Uloom
− |
"I think no scope to keep the non notable article."
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE.
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
22
− |
18.02
− |
Al-Jamiatul Islamiah Qasemul Uloom Charia
− |
Non notable Qawmi Madrasah
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
23
− |
18.02
− |
Jamia Luthfia Anwarul Uloom Hamidnagar
− |
"Non notable Qawmi Madrasah located in Bangladesh"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
24
− |
18.02
− |
Jamia Rahmania Arabia Dhaka
− |
"Non notable Deobandi madrasa"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; one of the largest madrassas in Bangladesh.
[4]
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
25
− |
18.02
− |
Al-Jamiatul Arabiatul Islamia, Ziri
− |
"Not notable Islamic religious institution"
− |
![]() − |
No evidence of BEFORE; 100+ years old, third largest madrassa in Bangladesh
− |
DELETE
− |
![]() − |
− *(closed inappropriately by Authordom, should have been speedy keep/nominator withdrawal.)
−
References
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (
link)
− -- Goldsztajn ( talk) 19:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
is clear inappropriate canvassing by AaqibAnjum. Don’t do that again, please. — MarkH21 talk 21:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Hey Sneha, I just noticed that you have faced some issues from Authordom, the biased editor I have ever seen on the Wikipedia. I have added a complaint about him on Administrators Noticeboard. I wish you to help me in getting him banned.
−
−
−
I have been concerned on the articles relating to the Indian Subcontinent of at least a handful of editors nominating sets of articles over a relatively short period of time at AfD over a relatively short time exhausting any significant scrutiny at AfD. That said the sourcing of many of the articles are of the poorest quality; online sources not linkrot protected, and the use of foreign language sources of the poorest quality. Authordom's nominations are often vaguewave; but I do note pre-tagging of
Template:Notabilty for a period before AfD nominations which is of some respect. Unless the community increases the requirement for a specifically force non-vaguewave nominations, analyse and penalise accounts that swamp AfD or have unexplained high AfD nomination fail rates, or require those embarking on set of related article nominations to register for support at WikiProject level these issues will continue with multiple editors.
Djm-leighpark (
talk) 12:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
− Proposal: Close ANI with no action and no prejudice. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 12:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Support Please note these article have tagged by numerous editors (Over 10) they could not find sources after a normal search that is other than Authordom for notabilty and sources and some of the articles were tagged way back from 2012 almost all of them have been tagged atleast 6 months before they were brought to AFD the last one was tagged in June 2019 and the article at the time of nomination was in a poor state.Further here WP:BEFORE is tough for Deobandi pages as the sources are more likely be in Urdu language and Bengali language may be not be covered in the mainstream media atleast in India or Bangladesh hence WP:AGF to all the 10 who tagged the pages and those who nominate it.One is free to nomiate an article tagged for notablity or sources for years in the normal course of editing. WP:BURDEN applies here as well.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Article nom'd by for deletion requested to
WP:REFUNDed to draft for analysis
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
−
− − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − −
−
− |
− I've requested refund to draft for all article nominated for deletion by Authordom, I'd generally recommend not trying to get these restored to mainspace via DRV as its likely any that could be require movement to mainspace would require improvement first. Most of these will likely left go G13 following 6 months elapse. In addition T. G. Mohandas has re-incarnated. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 23:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
− @ Djm-leighpark:, I had participated in the AfD discussion of Mohammad Najeeb Qasmi and then I was not possibly aware about how it works, it was only my comment there which saved this article as a draft and also it was my first AfD comment. I am working on the draft though at Draft:Mohammad Najeeb Qasmi. If I had not commented, I do not think that there would have been its draft still intact or that Authordom had not made its way to deletion -- Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 11:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
"... Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or rejected Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator.Here there was participation in most of the debates have do not think Refund is applicable here in most cases. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 07:49, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Frankly I feel this discussion is changing into a 'fog' of statistitical analysis and we are getting far away from the REAL problem of some people using AfD India and AfD Pakistan as 'weapons for clean-up' of their perceived opponents' articles and get their work of hundreds-of-hours-of-editing-time deleted or go to waste. I have mentioned this above before in this discussion and I hope that's not being ignored? On this, I agree with User:Goldsztajn that it's becoming a case of 'missing the forest for the trees'. We are getting off-track in this discussion and getting away from the root cause of the problem – which is AfDs being used as weapons and clean-up forums by some people with their own personal agendas. Some people might suggest that then keep going to those forums and keep voting Keep to save your work? Some results are in front of us and are shown above. When it's so super-easy to bring targeted opponent's article to AfD for deletion by some nominators without even bothering to do the required WP:Before properly, and they don't even get in trouble for ignoring it. Then why not? In this highly cynical day and age and people not having enough time, they end up the winners even if they have partial success in hurting the opponent. In my observation and experience, these deletion nominators at least have partial success due to SOME people with 'deletionist frame of mind' roaming around with their 'deletionist pens' to quickly vote Delete rather than waste or spend their time in looking at the article and then coming back and voting. Not all only some people vote like that, in my view. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 19:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
Ngrewal1 I can understand your frustrations as feeling as having to spend too much time at (on defence) at AfD is mentally draining; and a five minute WP:VAGUEWAVE nomination could result in a multi-hour rescue. However the fact an article needs rescue often (not always) is because it is poorly sourced, cites poorly embellished (especially if non-English), and plain looks wrong, and not protected from link-rot. 90% of the time if it looks right and looks well sourced a WP:VAGUEWAVE nominator won't go near it. While I share your concern some people may be nominating articles relating to the Indian subcontinent on factional lines, and perhaps doing other stuff on the same basis, it is important not to cast allegations unless there is hard evidence. In the case of this ANI I see indicators that seem to me like they warrant further scrutiny. In all events I've just issued you with a Ds/alert reminder and quite frankly I'd pretty well possibly want to consider doing that for everyone in this discussion if I had time but I have to avoid incorrectly issuing any. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 08:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
−
"...apparently nominated in good faith, but were actually examples of an ongoing issue with Wikipedia. If this tendentious pattern can be confirmed, then we have good grounds to ban Authordom from nominating articles for deletion for an indefinite period."It would be helpful if we could focus on following up on that. Thank you,-- Goldsztajn ( talk) 15:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
−
− I have to raise another issue here. Nothing but about similarity of editing pattern of users MalayaliWoman, ArtsRescuer and Authordom. MalayaliWoman has been blocked on 20 April 2019 for sock puppetry. User ArtsRescuer too blocked for sock puppetry on 24 May 2016. Authordom registered on 09 July 2019, and started editing on 08 August 2019. Here I can list some similarities.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− There are behavior of adding multiple issue template in same pattern found. This also to be verified and action to be taken.-- Irshadpp ( talk) 22:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− @ Authordom: Near the start of this discussion you requested sources be required to support the concern which evolved around good faith concerns of a non-neutral possible Ahle Sunnat wa Jama'at/Barelvi agenda. Such an agenda would I believe be a breach of Wikipedia:5P2, namely "Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view". Goldsztajn has presented a series of AfD nominations you have made that that seem to align with that concern. I hope you can understand the concerns and as you have asked for sources/supporting evidence I would appreciate, as might others, your response to such concerns. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 22:20, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
Hi, can anyone help me getting this discussion back? [
Possible issues with Authordom]. The discussion has not reached to its conclusion yet. Tagging associated editors:
Irshadpp,
Goldsztajn,
Ngrewal1 and
Djm-leighpark. Regards -
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (
talk) 20:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− from Wikipedia Teahouse
−
−
Hi, can anyone help me getting this discussion back? [
Possible issues with Authordom]. The discussion has not reached to its conclusion yet. Tagging associated editors:
Irshadpp,
Goldsztajn,
Ngrewal1 and
Djm-leighpark. Regards
−
− AaqibAnjum Looks like the ANI discussion we (5 above people) participated in is ONLY MOVED TO ARCHIVE FOR NOW without any Result Decision by the administrators. Aaqib, since you were the discussion starter or filer, my best guess is the Wikipedia administration should notify you first before any of us. Please be patient. In the meantime, thanks for sending me the alert. This is my first-ever ANI Discussion also. So I don't know more than you. I am thinking how can they leave the ANI Discussion unresolved? Let's wait for a day or two to see what we hear from them? Best Regards Ngrewal1 ( talk) 20:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− {{atopr
− | status =
− | result = Question asked, question answered. ( non-admin closure) —— SN 54129 09:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
− }}
−
−
−
−
Hi, can anyone help me getting this discussion back? [
Possible issues with Authordom]. The discussion has not reached to its conclusion yet. Tagging associated editors:
Irshadpp,
Goldsztajn,
Ngrewal1 and
Djm-leighpark. Regards -
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (
talk) 20:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
Just let it die is it your opinion or an administrative decision, @
NinjaRobotPirate:. How can a bot
move this discussion without a proper discussion or consensus. This move probably a mistake happened. Will you kill any discussion, just because of mass content. Why not understanding the history how this discussion became huge. Which is nothing but investment of many editors.
− Now if you are saying let it die it is a clear insult on those editors.-- Irshadpp ( talk) 04:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
|
−
−
−
Part of a Wikipedia help series on |
Wikipedia Awards |
---|
![]() |
|
Awarded by co-founder Jimmy Wales |
Awards by WikiProject |
Barnstars and other personal awards |
Awards by number of edits |
See also |
|
−
−
− Can anyone help me to archive my talk page? I have tried but there is something missing. want to do the archive Year wise. Jai49 ( talk) 12:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Promotional, fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO. The award received by him is third-highest honor which is not enough. Störm (talk) 11:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Non-notable businessman, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 12:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib ( talk) 11:40, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
References
−
−
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
−
−
− The Result was Delete
−
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
−
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
−
−
−
The more I look into this article the more I realize that Wikipedia is being misused for
WP:SELFPROMOTION. Previous AfD (
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehsan Sehgal (3nd nomination)) had substantial support towards delete but it was the ignorance of the nominator (relative of the subject) which outweighed and ruined all sensible arguments.
−
−
Years have elapsed, to date there are no results of the subject on Google news or Google books. Entirely fails
WP:GNG.
Orientls (
talk) 15:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Your neutrality is visible, I found the real reason as you practiced in these diffs - and you attacked this subject--
1,
2
− 3,
− 4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 ( talk) 22:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− delete - as vote, not policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:89FB:EA86:2045:2220 ( talk) 05:42, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
− Your imagination amusing me as well, I copied and paste as those were posted - You only removed reliable sources to get the article deleted, edit history proves that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1c00:1604:bb00:459b:2ced:129e:aab0 ( talk • contribs)
−
−
Sources
|
---|
− DESiegel: These sources and nomination for deletion? - 3 times notable per GNG? − −
− −
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− |
−
−
−
−
−
−
he got war medal from pak army, does he paid for that? - or it is minor than indian film awards? - anyhow delete it as you want, not as policy. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:1C00:1604:BB00:89FB:EA86:2045:2220 (
talk) 16:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Note for administrators: none of the delete votes executes Wikipedia rules since that article 3 time has passed the notability, there are now 31 most reliable sources that are cited in the article, which nominators removed that, claiming the article is not notable. It is a totally illegitimate move of nominators. All delete votes should be considered as just voting without defining rules and reading sources, not as consensus as policies. I do not think, admins are blind, they are here to enforce policies, not personal motives of anyone else. I do not know the subject as you do not know. Since third deletion, fortuna, explained as, this and Mar4d as this, it was edited also as talk page archieve by Lady and Drmies two admins as well. Further more - Overzealous deletion - Myths and facts about deletion as Myth: AfD is a vote. More "keeps" means it'll be kept, and more "deletes" means it'll be deleted.
− Fact: The numbers of keeps and deletes do not decide the outcome. Entries that are simply votes are dismissed. The comments that reference policies, guidelines, and essays and state why they call for inclusion or exclusion are actually those that will determine the outcome.
− — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 ( talk) 18:53, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
It seems these users
User:MistyGraceWhite,
User:Hammad,
User:AaqibAnjum,
User:Orientls,
User:Saqib,
User:Störm fall under
− Meatpuppetry characteristically, because of editing on many articles together, and comenting and awarding on talk pages. It is not coincidental that they all are here with selected decision delete without internet connections for conspiracy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 ( talk) 12:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
You all just victimized the article that passes GNG and Notability, whereas, I glanced articles which you created most of those entirely fail GNG as
this and professor of rules
User:Störm similarly enjoying the project to create
such kinds of articles trivial mentioned sources that completely fail GNG and come here to preach others the meaning of GNG - the article you blindly voted to delete, has been edited by the most experienced editors — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (
talk) 13:35, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
The way of convincing:
Such private movements create clear doubts and something not as the rules. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2001:1C00:1604:BB00:459B:2CED:129E:AAB0 (
talk) 17:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The result was keep. Withdrawn.
(non-admin closure)
Störm
(talk) 01:55, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
−
−
− Unverified claims, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 08:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
− Keep Seems to me this article may be worth saving. Found many reliable sources to verify his claims including Business Recorder newspaper and Pakistan Today newspaper. Please allow time so the article can be improved. I am working on it right now. Ngrewal1 ( talk) 17:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
Hifz-ur-Rehman (died 1970) was a
Pakistani
archaeologist,
historian and
linguist.
−
−
"Hifz-ur-Rehman donated his life-long collection of nearly 1,500
antiquities to the
Lahore Museum, including three Quranic manuscripts of historical significance written by
Imam Hussain (grandson of the Islamic prophet
Muhammad), many decrees, Chinese porcelain, rare coins, glass objects, miniatures, ivory objects and specimens of
calligraphy and
Islamic art objects".
−
−
Nearly 40 years after his death, his dedication and service was appreciated and he was awarded by the President of Pakistan in 2011.
− Ngrewal1 ( talk) 16:42, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
−
− Keep This article seems to have historical and religious significance. NBajwa1 ( talk) 22:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC) — NBajwa1 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 ( talk) 02:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)−
−
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)−
−
−
−
−
−
−
Asalamualaikum brother, I don't know why you mentioned me in this conversation subjected above.
−
−
I am new. Can you please elaborate things what are that?
−
−
Kya mujhse koi mistake huwi ha kahi????
TheChunky (
talk) 09:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
I saw that you are adopting new user. I have also added Adopt me tag on my userpage.
−
−
Can you help me in learning Wikipedia. I don't know how to add tags to get adopted.
TheChunky (
talk) 10:26, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
What to do now? Do we get connected here or we connect on social media? Or something else?
TheChunky (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 10:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
– A user has requested
CheckUser. An
SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The master is a newbie (joined in April) and sock joined only few days back. Both have Afded my articles which I am counting below.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (
talk) 09:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
The master is a newbie (joined in April) and sock joined only few days back. Both have Afded my articles which I am counting below.
Aaqib Anjum Aafī (
talk) 09:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
− Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
−
−
−
−
−
−
− − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − −
Editor
− |
Time and date
− |
User talk page
− |
Edit summary
− |
Contributions by the user whose talk page was written on
− |
Number of contributions
− |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Numan765 | 11:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:KGFT785 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/KGFT785 | 477
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Jesuisunovni | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Jesuisunovni | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Eb Maakun | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Eb Maakun | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Alzeha | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Alzeha | 1
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Amar c malusare | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Amar c malusare | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:05, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Mnojpacemaker | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Mnojpacemaker | 2
− |
Numan765 | 11:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Tanatan123 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Tanatan123 | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Aashi anjan | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Aashi anjan | 1
− |
Numan765 | 11:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:MrJaviR | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/MrJaviR | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Jammyboy465 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Jammyboy465 | 0
− |
Numan765 | 11:02, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Chelsea5737 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Chelsea5737 | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:47, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Marassi bahrain | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Marassi bahrain | 11
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Ithal Sn | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Ithal Sn | 1
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Anurag8077 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Anurag8077 | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Bjpindian | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Bjpindian | 2
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:P3ngoxlonton | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/P3ngoxlonton | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Concionator | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Concionator | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:PresqueHumain | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/PresqueHumain | 0
− |
Numan765 | 10:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:C-Siccness Cole | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/C-Siccness Cole | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:SunSOG | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/SunSOG | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Mohammed Mutaher Hossain | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Mohammed Mutaher Hossain | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Rajiv2511 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Rajiv2511 | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:MarioMarioMarioMario | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/MarioMarioMarioMario | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Pabalter | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Pabalter | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Fvaro | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Fvaro | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Britneys127 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Britneys127 | 6
− |
KST981 | 08:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:HelloIamyourfriend | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/HelloIamyourfriend | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:TheNoob 2020 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/TheNoob 2020 | 0
− |
KST981 | 08:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:Beiker71 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/Beiker71 | 1
− |
KST981 | 08:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC) | User talk:JoJoStalin1924 | Welcome to Wikipedia! ( TW) | Special:Contributions/JoJoStalin1924 | 0
− |
− -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
−
−
−
−
− This case is being reviewed by RoySmith as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case (including admin actions against suspected socks) without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
−
no substantial edits by others. That would be unusual for an AfD, but if you know of any specific examples, let me know and I'll take a look. Feel free to annotate any non-G5-eligible AfDs with a link to this SPI, however. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
−
The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum ( talk) 15:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-notable record label, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 14:03, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 22:17, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
non notable actress. Fails WP:GNG, Fails WP:NACTOR Numan765 ( talk) 10:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
*Delete Small role in non notable movies. Fails
WP:GNG.
KST981 (
talk) 09:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
GEM COMMENT above by - Toddy1 about HARD TO FIND references FROM the PAST. 18 June 2020
FOR MOWAHID MOHSIN
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rind Khan, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. ~ Amkgp 💬 05:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Ok, thanks for you help Mowahid Mohsin ( talk) 06:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Mian Sheheryar (1928 – 9 January 2011) was a Pakistani television and film music composer.
Mian Sheheryar was born in Lahore, Punjab, British India in 1928. [1]
He joined the Pakistani television at its Lahore center since its inception in 1964, stayed with it and worked there for over 40 years until his death in 2011. He is credited with introducing many singers – Naseem Begum (only on PTV - Ghulam Ahmed Chishti had already introduced her in film Guddi Gudda (1956)), classical music and ghazal singer Hamid Ali Khan, Irene Perveen, folk singer Iqbal Bahu, Shabnam Majeed and Hadiqa Kiani. All these singers he introduced, as we know now, achieved success later in the Pakistani film industry and television. [1]
Song | Singer | Lyricist | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Nainon Mein Jal Bhar Aaye, Rooth Gaya Mera Pyar | Naseem Begum | Mushir Kazmi | Film Begunah (1958) |
Aei Watan Kay Sajeelay Jawano, Mere Naghme Tumhare Liye Hein [1] | Noor Jehan | Jamiluddin Aali | A highly popular song from the Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 |
Qaseeda Burda Sharif or Qaṣīda al-Burda (Poem of the Mantle), in praise of Prophet Muhammad | Humera Arshad, Fariha Pervez and singer Khurshid Anwar | Imam Sharfuddin Al-Busiri | A Pakistan Television Corporation production |
Mian Sheheryar died in his hometown Lahore, Pakistan at the Shalamar Hospital on 9 January 2011 at the age of 84. Some of his PTV colleagues including PTV's Lahore general Manager Farrukh Bashir, former PTV producer Mushtaq Sufi and music critic/newspaper columnist Amjad Parvez attended his funeral. [1]
To edit, please
log in.
Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.
Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. ... discospinster talk 01:54, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Islamic Barnstar | |
Thanks for your contribution for all the Islamic Topics. Keep up the good Job.
Oniongas (
talk) 11:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
|
![]() |
![]() | |
Awarded to ?. for his awesome hard work towards Pakistan location articles. Your contribution to wikipedia in this area is greatly appreciated. I've been browsing and we owe you at least a lot of credit and respect for your efforts at starting articles like Abbottabad Tehsil. |
Location | Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan |
---|---|
Opening | 19 March 1975 |
Website |
dhalahore |
Companies | |
Owner | Pakistan Army |
The Defence Housing Authority, Lahore (DHA Lahore) ( Urdu: اختیاریہَ دفاعی اقامت کاری ، لاہور) is a housing society located in Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. DHA's initial phase was built for army officers and their families (as Civil & Defence Officers Cooperative Housing Society and later as Lahore Cantonment Cooperative Housing Society - LCCHS), however, now it serves to both retired military officers and civil population of city as it mainly is a private commercial housing scheme operating under the Pakistan Army. [1] [2] [3]
The area has also undergone extensive gentrification, bringing in a more wealthy base. The recent influx of population from the adjoining cities.
During the past years, developers have acquired surrounding land, which has increased new development in the area. New developments include a world-class golf resort in partnership with Bandar Raya Developments of Malaysia in Phase 6 of DHA and a shopping and office complex in partnership with Global Haly of the United Kingdom in Phase 2 of DHA.
DHA encompasses two famous shopping centres, known as the 'Y-block' market and the 'H-block' market. DHA Y Block also has a sports club, gym, a large commercial swimming pool and other sports facilities for the community. DHA Lahore main office was also located at Phase III, Sector Y but the management has decided to relocate the office at Phase VI, Sector A, just to accommodate number of people, who visit office on daily basis. There are other smaller commercial markets in DHA- like T block which has many cafes - like Hot spot, Jammin - Java and various other salons. T block commercial area also has the first swimming pool & spa equipment display center called Olympic Pool.
Two international standard sports complexes have been planned in the area and construction has started on the projects as of 2011.
Currently, DHA has nine phases, from phase 1 to phase 9 that are open for possession of the civilian population. The remaining two phases, from phase 10 to 11 in the process of extensive development. Each phase has a number of sectors or blocks having English alphabets as their names which are further subdivided into plots for the construction of houses ranging from the land area five marla (approx. 1361 square feet) to 2 Kanals (approx. 10890 square feet). Each phase also has a central commercial area for shops and offices catering to the community. The phases of the most construction and population are the Phases 1 to 6, with Phase 7,8 and 9 being scarcely populated. The overall plan of Phases 1 to 4 displays an older style of town development with narrower roads, streets and grassy areas, also without underground wiring for electrification, while also lacking sector mosques. Phase 5,6 and 7 being the most recent in terms of planning and development show sixty feet roads as well as broader streets, with underground electrification and each sector or block having its own mosque. [4] [5]
Defence is divided into 10 subdivisions (or phases), which each phase being subdivided further into blocks. Each phase also has a central commercial area to cater to the local community. Housing construction began from Defence I and proliferated east and south towards what is today Defence VII. The remaining four phases (Defence VIII, IX, XI, XII) are currently under development. Housing plots range from five marla (approx. 1361 square feet) to 2 kanals (approx. 10890 square feet). The central headquarters was originally located in Defence III, Sector Y but relocated to Defence VI, Sector A to accommodate more residents in the neighbourhood. [6]
Phase | Sectors |
---|---|
Defence I | |
Defence II | |
Defence III | |
Defence IV | |
Defence V | |
Defence VI | |
Defence VII | |
Defence VIII | Under development |
Defence IX | Under development |
Defence XI | Known locally as Defence Rahbar |
Defence XII | Known locally as Defence EME |
The main hospital situated in the heart of DHA is The National Hospital. Alternative hospitals within easy reach of DHA can be found on the Defence Main Boulevard (the road leading to the main DHA entrance). In addition to the hospitals, small clinics can be found in markets all over. Many pharmacies can also be found scattered throughout DHA, Lahore. Government of Punjab, Pakistan tries to take preventive measures every year to control the Dengue virus spread throughout Lahore city area including DHA, Lahore. [7]
Dear Saqib,
I hope you doing well,
It has been observed that you have been nominating my articles for invalid deletion, brother I would like to clarify whats the matter as you have nominated invalid article delectation, I told you earlier as well, lets work together to improve WP:Pakistan as team as others are working why you dont understand? lets talk and solve our matters as you are not reading articles and nominating for deleting and instead of adding citations or improvement request you are just adding invalid deleting invalid templates, lets work together and improve for betterment of Wikipedia and those article which you feel require improvement we can improve them as I always take my all articles as responsibility and its our responsibility to improve articles.
I will also help to improve your articles by adding citations which I already did in past, but you always act negatively which count under WP:NPA policy.
Let me know, if we can be friends, and wish you Happy HOLY MONTH OF RAMADAN & LAIL UL QADIR
JAZAKALLAH Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 21:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to
103.151.0.166 while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being
blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's
policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your
IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you.
Liz
Read!
Talk! 23:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC)