The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Contested PROD. There is no significant coverage about this author, even with a thorough Google search. Fails WP:GNG. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The consensus is clearly to delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
I've done some relatively extensive searching for references on this individual, as there are a lot of name drops and mentions. Unfortunately, in searching both normally and via some more art-specific publications via library databases( [1], [2], [3] as a few examples, ), all I can find are mentions and name drops, with a few brief "bio" blurbs on some organizations which have been affiliated with her. I at one point had deleted this as the result of an AfD discussion, and restored it to draft when someone thought they could make something of it, but I just don't see the type of coverage necessary to sustain an article here. (I will also note that an editor who states they are the subject has been heavily involved with the article, though that has been done with full disclosure and via the talk page.) Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:07, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Seems sufficient coverage for GNG, particularly with the book noted below. Fenix down ( talk) 07:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Maybe all the "good stuff" is in Hungarian, which I cannot read, but I cannot find anything on this club other than the generic stats pages that exist about every footy team out there. Since its creation in 2011 it's been nothing but a listing of the players. A PROD was declined citing WP:FOOTYN, but even that guideline says that the team has to meet GNG. I don't see it here, but I'm happy to be proven wrong. Primefac ( talk) 22:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Notability. Lexy iris ( talk) 21:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete, no independent coverage, is not notable. Alex-h ( talk) 08:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. The single source is highly unreliable. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 21:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Autobiography that fails WP:BASIC, fails WP:AUTHOR as all his works are self-published, fails WP:ACTOR because his role was in a short film produced by his fellow university students and he is uncredited in it, fails WP:CREATIVE for a non-notable local competition which was only held once... a recreation of an article previously deleted twice, and not addressing any of the problems of a complete lack of notability and sources. Would suggest that this article name, "JL Diazgranados" and "J.L. Diazgranados" are all salted to stop this pointless recreation over and over again. Richard3120 ( talk) 21:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Article contains no RS, and no real assertion of anything that would amount to a real claim of notability. I'm not finding much in the way of coverage online, although his very common name and apparent obscurity makes searching tricky. GirthSummit (blether) 18:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not notable - Contains one self-published source, some interviews with Morteza Pashaei, some interviews with the subject of the article, also some other not-directly-related sources, such as a link to one of Morteza Pashaei's songs. Besides, the article has a promotional approach, contains sentences like "has had a passion for music since childhood" or "He would sing along with music and it would bring him the ultimate joy". Ahmad talk 16:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
KeepWikipedia rules say that one of the artist's favorite options is the production of the work.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(music)
How an artist can have a 17-year work history but not be famous!!
For more than 80 works produced on Wikipedia, It's unfair delete tag.
Justiceisvictorious —Preceding
undated comment added
09:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC) —
Justiceisvictorious (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
KeepWith a little Google search you can find this artist's name, the artist is trying for a work, the people around the world know these people make them feel good about being more active, I know this artist and like all artists around the world That is respectable.
User:setayesh1392 —Preceding
undated comment added
10:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC) —
setayesh1392 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep 379/5000
As an Iranian, I fully understand that artistic activity in Iran is very difficult, and I know Ali Hosseinzadeh as an artist.
Much work has been done to mention Morteza Pashaei's Nafs song which is a famous piece, it is available on all Iranian music sites, he has collaborated with famous singers such as Mehrdad Asemani, Shahram Kashani(shahrumk), thanks to Wikipedia.
newsightt —Preceding
undated comment added
11:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC) —
newsightt (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep I know this artist and I follow all his work, he is present and working in Iran and collaborating with great artists, an example of his work was composing "khayli vaghte" by
Shahram Kashani in the Youtube music video (source) This music and Wikipedia page of
Shahrum Kashani singles track has been named after him, arranged by
Morteza Pashaei "Nafas" track recorded on Cover Music (Source) and on the song page of
Morteza Pashaei Wikipedia Singles song, both of which are His works are all sourced and the rest can be followed from his page and the internet. Among other things, he has collaborated on other artists' in music albums . In my opinion, this type of editing may be in violation of Wikipedia, which should be complete rather than an artist's page being deleted, closing an artist's page violates the Wikipedia rules, I will do my best to help complete the page.
Shafagh—
AShafagh (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep This artist has been working since 2003 . A few examples of this artist's pieces are available on the radiojavan.com
AliHosseinzadeh. I love Massoud Emami's song Vaghty yeki mibakhshatet
[8] Or Saeed arab, and he also produced for Anoushirvan Taghavi, who is a musician and has arranged for many Singers. keep the artist's support page. Thanks
BalanceofTruth —Preceding
undated comment added
14:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC) —
BalanceofTruth (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep I have a lot of respect for this composer, I knew him from composing a children's theater called Pamble, my son fell in love with the theater, and after I knew his name I realized he was a singer. He has composed for Iranian singers. In Iran, many ordinary people do not know these people because the Iranian government is not interested in being recognized as artists. They are not supported by the national media. For me they are respectable
shmallekian22 —Preceding
undated comment added
08:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC) —
shmallekian22 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep It is only logical to find out about the work of an artist. His name is even found on Apple Music sites. I've read the rules of Wikipedia and I don't think it is wrong to create a page for this artist, I'm sure Wikipedia managers will make the best judgment
Riyahiahmad —Preceding
undated comment added
11:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC) —
Riyahiahmad (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep I remember him at the first Morteza Pashaie concert in Milad Tower. Morteza Pashai's fans demanded the Nafas song. Before performing the song, Morteza Pasha introduced him to the fans as an composer. I know this artist.
ahmadzadeh8053 —
ahmadzadeh8053 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Tone 22:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
No notable films produced. Founder died in 2014. Domain name is for sale. Fails WP:NCORP. Edwardx ( talk) 15:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was procedural close - delete. Article speedy deleted under G11 —usernamekiran (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
No reliable sources exist, fails WP:GNG. Andrew Base ( talk) 15:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Comments since the relist show a consensus that there is sufficient coverage of this incident to make it notable. RL0919 ( talk) 15:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Hardly noteworthy for a mention in Wikipedia and certainly not noteworthy for a stand-alone article. Wikipedia is not a place for trivial news stories. Contested PROD MilborneOne ( talk) 21:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
"Citation stuffing"is a baseless claim which tells me you did not look at the article. WP:HEY. It is quite obvious to the readers that the added citations were for information regarding:
The result was redirect to Jainism in Belgium. No desire to Keep; the Redirect to Jainism in Belgium preserves the content if this can be improved in the future (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
No reliable sources can be found. Interstellarity ( talk) 14:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus to Keep (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
No reliable sources and not notable and fails ( WP:NMUSIC). Interstellarity ( talk) 14:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
This person is not notable and fails WP:ENT. Interstellarity ( talk) 13:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~~ OxonAlex - talk 19:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Don't seem to be SIGCOV RS for this in sources given that are mainly news articles, and I doubt there exists any SIGCOV RS anywhere. This is at best some mildly recurring press conference question but either way no well-documented rhetorical tactic as the article seems to make it out to be. Gaioa ( T C L) 19:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
BBC Online says in 2012, "It's a classical political ambush that has been popular on both sides of the Atlantic for decades."
The Daily Telegraph in 2012 says, "This one has been tripping up politicians around the world for years" and "Politicians who have been caught out by the price of milk question include former farming minister Jim Paice".
The Daily Telegraph in a 2015 article says "Why the 'pint of milk' test is past its sell-by date".
The Belfast Telegraph in 2013 says politicians' being asked "the price of milk or bread" is "he oldest booby-trap in the book – yet politicians keep falling for it".
The Philadelphia Inquirer says in 2007, "The price test is just a lazy journalistic gimmick designed to imply that a political candidate is out of touch with the lives of the masses."
Thomas M. Kostigen wrote in a 2011 book, "And a typical test of a politician's "Americanness" is to be able to quote the price of a gallon of milk."
The Independent notes in 2012, "The price of milk is a time-worn interviewer's weapon".
If this material can be merged to an article where it fits better, I would support that. I oppose deletion since this is well-sourced material that sources have highlighted as being significant.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable, completely in-universe unnecessary forked content. TTN ( talk) 12:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 11:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
As written, fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Sources are all primary sources. Per my WP:BEFORE procedures, using the article name in both Google quotation mark-enclosed web and news searches, the only non-duplicated web search results were directory listings, job listings, search engine optimization-type pages, and social media. Of the news search results, the only results were mere passing mentions or trivial, hyper-local coverage related to a shopping centre redevelopment plan in which the electronics retailer was a current or proposed tenant or occasional mentions whereby a store was broken into (note: even following WP:SIGCOV, a bank branch can be robbed multiple times and still fail WP:Notability). No evidence of either (a) current or (b) potential notability. Doug Mehus ( talk) 23:25, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability depends on the existence of significant coverage in independent secondary sources, which do not appear to exist in this case. RL0919 ( talk) 11:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Original research on a non-notable person. We have an article on his father but notability is not inherited – also I can't find any sources that mention Thomas Pride having had a son, like this article says: "his existence remained hidden from all official records except for his gravestone". Article doesn't make a credible claim of notability, practically no coverage of this person exists, he is mentioned in passing in this source which lists some immigrants to Maine but there's no way of finding out which Joseph Pride it's talking about. The rest is synthesis and personal family knowledge.
Author declined PROD with the reason: "Family history preserved over 400 years, and passed down. I heard if from my father Byron, who heard if from his Father and Grandfather (Byron Pride). MARKED BY 200 YEARS OF EVERY FIRST BORN NAMED JOSEPH. How much do you want?" – Thjarkur (talk) 10:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 11:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable, and I cannot find any reliable sources anywhere. The most major contributor to the article is now permanently blocked so it seems unlikely that this page will ever improve. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 09:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus was the subject passes WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Rollidan ( talk) 16:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Lack of notability Saff V. ( talk) 06:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. bd2412 T 20:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
A non-notable actress, Lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya ( talk) 04:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 22:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable actor, lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya ( talk) 04:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per WP:HEY by RuthVancouver and Thsmi002 (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
It cannot determined what is she notable for, clearly fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya ( talk) 04:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Setting aside the confirmed sockpuppets and brand new accounts, there is little support for keeping this article and plenty of support for deleting it based on a lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. RL0919 ( talk) 04:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This is a WP:NEO not in common use. No references outside of Rahul Banerjee's blog for this term and I was unable to find any additional. PROD removed by article author without improvement. Article author acknowledges this term is not in common use yet. shoy ( reactions) 13:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
This article is about a new concept. It describes the practical steps that need to be taken to solve the very important problems of water, energy, global warming and agriculture crises that are threatening the very existence of the human race on planet. There is enough work on the ground on this even though not much has yet been written on it by many independent writers. Consequently, this page should not be deleted. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs)
15:03, 18 October 2019 (UTC) —
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
The original author of the article has added new third party sources in it that cite "survival edge technology" and its implementation and so the objection of this term being a neologism without external third party citations has been addressed and therefore the article is not a fit candidate for deletion anymore.
Xavier2209 (
talk)
06:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Xavier2209 —
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
I have been following this page for a long time, and i can concur that lot of third party references have been added and debunk the deletion logic. I recommend removal of the deletion tag.
Akshatver (
talk)
11:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) Akshatver —
Akshatver (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
KeepThe article is well referenced now as additional third party citations have been added. The disclaimer entered in the India Water Portal article is to protect it from litigation and not because there is no peer review. There is moderation and editing before an article is published in India Water Portal. So there is enough reliable citation in support of the article.
Xavier2209 (
talk)
17:49, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Xavier2209 —
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
Additional Note for the closing administratorThere is no pressure to keep. The words used to favour keeping do not constitute pressure but are opinions expressed without any ulterior motive whatsoever. A genuine effort is being made to broaden the knowledge base. Even if the article does get deleted from Wikipedia it will not affect the further development of the subject in theory and practice will it?!!! Eventually the decision will be taken in accordance with well settled policy. Policy is paramount and not the number of votes so there is no question of canvassing. If the closing administrator feels that the independent sources cited are insufficient or not up to the mark, the article will be deleted and that is that. Where is the need for acrimony?
Xavier2209 (
talk) 08:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Xavier2209 —
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
KeepThere are enough third party references to the subject of the article, some published in reputable websites and others self published. The reliability of these third party sources is being questioned by fellow editors. However, I feel that these sources are of good quality and provenance.
Akshatver (
talk)
16:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Akshatver —
Akshatver (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. —
Akshatver (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
The result was merge to Asgardia. Going by the arguments that mergeable content exists and that nobody has given a rationale for "not" merging Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. ∯WBG converse 16:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. The possibility of moving the article to a different title is left to regular move processes. RL0919 ( talk) 01:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Short unreferenced personal essay Rathfelder ( talk) 07:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable. Only biographical coverage is a book written by his wife and published by his daughter. Does not meet WP:GNG. Yunshui 雲 水 00:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
If doubt persists, I would suggest moving it into a draft. It would be incubate in draftspace. - Not logged in
Is notable. Meets
WP:GNG. Only one book published due to anonymity of activities and political conflict. Book published 20 years after death of author. Biographical information included in notable book which is stored in national library archives and used by historians in other publications and housing development in homeplace named after him. Article mentions section of book where Mitchell was offered Command of the Southern Division of Irish Free State Army by politician and general Michael Collins, which he turned down. - Not logged in — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
185.31.99.253 (
talk)
05:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
He was NOT a communist. Story re Michael Collins is untrue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8084:6A00:7D00:1DD3:1306:6BB1:CF8A ( talk) 10:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
He was not privileged. Mitchell family were lock keepers on the Grand Canal with a small piece of land. He lived with a large family in a small lock house owned by the Grand Canal Company.
He was a member of Fianna Fáil in later life.
The reference to Tim Quill is irrelevant as they had little in common and rarely if ever met.
He had no accountancy qualification.
He had little interest in religion regarding all all similar and is unlikely to have studied Newman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8084:6A00:7D00:1DD3:1306:6BB1:CF8A ( talk) 11:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable author. Does not meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG. Yunshui 雲 水 00:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
If doubt persists, I would suggest moving it to draft. Incubate in draftspace. Not logged in.
Notable author. Book stored in national library and used by historians in other works. Housing development named after her in homeplace. Meets WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. Not logged in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.31.99.253 ( talk) 05:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:03, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Contested PROD. There is no significant coverage about this author, even with a thorough Google search. Fails WP:GNG. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The consensus is clearly to delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
I've done some relatively extensive searching for references on this individual, as there are a lot of name drops and mentions. Unfortunately, in searching both normally and via some more art-specific publications via library databases( [1], [2], [3] as a few examples, ), all I can find are mentions and name drops, with a few brief "bio" blurbs on some organizations which have been affiliated with her. I at one point had deleted this as the result of an AfD discussion, and restored it to draft when someone thought they could make something of it, but I just don't see the type of coverage necessary to sustain an article here. (I will also note that an editor who states they are the subject has been heavily involved with the article, though that has been done with full disclosure and via the talk page.) Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:07, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Seems sufficient coverage for GNG, particularly with the book noted below. Fenix down ( talk) 07:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Maybe all the "good stuff" is in Hungarian, which I cannot read, but I cannot find anything on this club other than the generic stats pages that exist about every footy team out there. Since its creation in 2011 it's been nothing but a listing of the players. A PROD was declined citing WP:FOOTYN, but even that guideline says that the team has to meet GNG. I don't see it here, but I'm happy to be proven wrong. Primefac ( talk) 22:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Notability. Lexy iris ( talk) 21:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Delete, no independent coverage, is not notable. Alex-h ( talk) 08:50, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. The single source is highly unreliable. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 21:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Autobiography that fails WP:BASIC, fails WP:AUTHOR as all his works are self-published, fails WP:ACTOR because his role was in a short film produced by his fellow university students and he is uncredited in it, fails WP:CREATIVE for a non-notable local competition which was only held once... a recreation of an article previously deleted twice, and not addressing any of the problems of a complete lack of notability and sources. Would suggest that this article name, "JL Diazgranados" and "J.L. Diazgranados" are all salted to stop this pointless recreation over and over again. Richard3120 ( talk) 21:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Article contains no RS, and no real assertion of anything that would amount to a real claim of notability. I'm not finding much in the way of coverage online, although his very common name and apparent obscurity makes searching tricky. GirthSummit (blether) 18:11, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 21:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not notable - Contains one self-published source, some interviews with Morteza Pashaei, some interviews with the subject of the article, also some other not-directly-related sources, such as a link to one of Morteza Pashaei's songs. Besides, the article has a promotional approach, contains sentences like "has had a passion for music since childhood" or "He would sing along with music and it would bring him the ultimate joy". Ahmad talk 16:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
KeepWikipedia rules say that one of the artist's favorite options is the production of the work.
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(music)
How an artist can have a 17-year work history but not be famous!!
For more than 80 works produced on Wikipedia, It's unfair delete tag.
Justiceisvictorious —Preceding
undated comment added
09:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC) —
Justiceisvictorious (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
KeepWith a little Google search you can find this artist's name, the artist is trying for a work, the people around the world know these people make them feel good about being more active, I know this artist and like all artists around the world That is respectable.
User:setayesh1392 —Preceding
undated comment added
10:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC) —
setayesh1392 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep 379/5000
As an Iranian, I fully understand that artistic activity in Iran is very difficult, and I know Ali Hosseinzadeh as an artist.
Much work has been done to mention Morteza Pashaei's Nafs song which is a famous piece, it is available on all Iranian music sites, he has collaborated with famous singers such as Mehrdad Asemani, Shahram Kashani(shahrumk), thanks to Wikipedia.
newsightt —Preceding
undated comment added
11:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC) —
newsightt (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep I know this artist and I follow all his work, he is present and working in Iran and collaborating with great artists, an example of his work was composing "khayli vaghte" by
Shahram Kashani in the Youtube music video (source) This music and Wikipedia page of
Shahrum Kashani singles track has been named after him, arranged by
Morteza Pashaei "Nafas" track recorded on Cover Music (Source) and on the song page of
Morteza Pashaei Wikipedia Singles song, both of which are His works are all sourced and the rest can be followed from his page and the internet. Among other things, he has collaborated on other artists' in music albums . In my opinion, this type of editing may be in violation of Wikipedia, which should be complete rather than an artist's page being deleted, closing an artist's page violates the Wikipedia rules, I will do my best to help complete the page.
Shafagh—
AShafagh (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep This artist has been working since 2003 . A few examples of this artist's pieces are available on the radiojavan.com
AliHosseinzadeh. I love Massoud Emami's song Vaghty yeki mibakhshatet
[8] Or Saeed arab, and he also produced for Anoushirvan Taghavi, who is a musician and has arranged for many Singers. keep the artist's support page. Thanks
BalanceofTruth —Preceding
undated comment added
14:12, 3 November 2019 (UTC) —
BalanceofTruth (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep I have a lot of respect for this composer, I knew him from composing a children's theater called Pamble, my son fell in love with the theater, and after I knew his name I realized he was a singer. He has composed for Iranian singers. In Iran, many ordinary people do not know these people because the Iranian government is not interested in being recognized as artists. They are not supported by the national media. For me they are respectable
shmallekian22 —Preceding
undated comment added
08:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC) —
shmallekian22 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep It is only logical to find out about the work of an artist. His name is even found on Apple Music sites. I've read the rules of Wikipedia and I don't think it is wrong to create a page for this artist, I'm sure Wikipedia managers will make the best judgment
Riyahiahmad —Preceding
undated comment added
11:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC) —
Riyahiahmad (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep I remember him at the first Morteza Pashaie concert in Milad Tower. Morteza Pashai's fans demanded the Nafas song. Before performing the song, Morteza Pasha introduced him to the fans as an composer. I know this artist.
ahmadzadeh8053 —
ahmadzadeh8053 (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was delete. Tone 22:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
No notable films produced. Founder died in 2014. Domain name is for sale. Fails WP:NCORP. Edwardx ( talk) 15:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was procedural close - delete. Article speedy deleted under G11 —usernamekiran (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
No reliable sources exist, fails WP:GNG. Andrew Base ( talk) 15:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Comments since the relist show a consensus that there is sufficient coverage of this incident to make it notable. RL0919 ( talk) 15:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Hardly noteworthy for a mention in Wikipedia and certainly not noteworthy for a stand-alone article. Wikipedia is not a place for trivial news stories. Contested PROD MilborneOne ( talk) 21:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
"Citation stuffing"is a baseless claim which tells me you did not look at the article. WP:HEY. It is quite obvious to the readers that the added citations were for information regarding:
The result was redirect to Jainism in Belgium. No desire to Keep; the Redirect to Jainism in Belgium preserves the content if this can be improved in the future (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
No reliable sources can be found. Interstellarity ( talk) 14:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus to Keep (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
No reliable sources and not notable and fails ( WP:NMUSIC). Interstellarity ( talk) 14:03, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
This person is not notable and fails WP:ENT. Interstellarity ( talk) 13:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~~ OxonAlex - talk 19:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Don't seem to be SIGCOV RS for this in sources given that are mainly news articles, and I doubt there exists any SIGCOV RS anywhere. This is at best some mildly recurring press conference question but either way no well-documented rhetorical tactic as the article seems to make it out to be. Gaioa ( T C L) 19:57, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
BBC Online says in 2012, "It's a classical political ambush that has been popular on both sides of the Atlantic for decades."
The Daily Telegraph in 2012 says, "This one has been tripping up politicians around the world for years" and "Politicians who have been caught out by the price of milk question include former farming minister Jim Paice".
The Daily Telegraph in a 2015 article says "Why the 'pint of milk' test is past its sell-by date".
The Belfast Telegraph in 2013 says politicians' being asked "the price of milk or bread" is "he oldest booby-trap in the book – yet politicians keep falling for it".
The Philadelphia Inquirer says in 2007, "The price test is just a lazy journalistic gimmick designed to imply that a political candidate is out of touch with the lives of the masses."
Thomas M. Kostigen wrote in a 2011 book, "And a typical test of a politician's "Americanness" is to be able to quote the price of a gallon of milk."
The Independent notes in 2012, "The price of milk is a time-worn interviewer's weapon".
If this material can be merged to an article where it fits better, I would support that. I oppose deletion since this is well-sourced material that sources have highlighted as being significant.
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 13:31, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable, completely in-universe unnecessary forked content. TTN ( talk) 12:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 11:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
As written, fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Sources are all primary sources. Per my WP:BEFORE procedures, using the article name in both Google quotation mark-enclosed web and news searches, the only non-duplicated web search results were directory listings, job listings, search engine optimization-type pages, and social media. Of the news search results, the only results were mere passing mentions or trivial, hyper-local coverage related to a shopping centre redevelopment plan in which the electronics retailer was a current or proposed tenant or occasional mentions whereby a store was broken into (note: even following WP:SIGCOV, a bank branch can be robbed multiple times and still fail WP:Notability). No evidence of either (a) current or (b) potential notability. Doug Mehus ( talk) 23:25, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Notability depends on the existence of significant coverage in independent secondary sources, which do not appear to exist in this case. RL0919 ( talk) 11:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Original research on a non-notable person. We have an article on his father but notability is not inherited – also I can't find any sources that mention Thomas Pride having had a son, like this article says: "his existence remained hidden from all official records except for his gravestone". Article doesn't make a credible claim of notability, practically no coverage of this person exists, he is mentioned in passing in this source which lists some immigrants to Maine but there's no way of finding out which Joseph Pride it's talking about. The rest is synthesis and personal family knowledge.
Author declined PROD with the reason: "Family history preserved over 400 years, and passed down. I heard if from my father Byron, who heard if from his Father and Grandfather (Byron Pride). MARKED BY 200 YEARS OF EVERY FIRST BORN NAMED JOSEPH. How much do you want?" – Thjarkur (talk) 10:21, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 11:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable, and I cannot find any reliable sources anywhere. The most major contributor to the article is now permanently blocked so it seems unlikely that this page will ever improve. Cardiffbear88 ( talk) 09:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Consensus was the subject passes WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Rollidan ( talk) 16:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Lack of notability Saff V. ( talk) 06:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. bd2412 T 20:34, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
A non-notable actress, Lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya ( talk) 04:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 22:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable actor, lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya ( talk) 04:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per WP:HEY by RuthVancouver and Thsmi002 (non-admin closure) Britishfinance ( talk) 01:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
It cannot determined what is she notable for, clearly fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya ( talk) 04:33, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Setting aside the confirmed sockpuppets and brand new accounts, there is little support for keeping this article and plenty of support for deleting it based on a lack of coverage in independent reliable sources. RL0919 ( talk) 04:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This is a WP:NEO not in common use. No references outside of Rahul Banerjee's blog for this term and I was unable to find any additional. PROD removed by article author without improvement. Article author acknowledges this term is not in common use yet. shoy ( reactions) 13:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
This article is about a new concept. It describes the practical steps that need to be taken to solve the very important problems of water, energy, global warming and agriculture crises that are threatening the very existence of the human race on planet. There is enough work on the ground on this even though not much has yet been written on it by many independent writers. Consequently, this page should not be deleted. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs)
15:03, 18 October 2019 (UTC) —
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
The original author of the article has added new third party sources in it that cite "survival edge technology" and its implementation and so the objection of this term being a neologism without external third party citations has been addressed and therefore the article is not a fit candidate for deletion anymore.
Xavier2209 (
talk)
06:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Xavier2209 —
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
I have been following this page for a long time, and i can concur that lot of third party references have been added and debunk the deletion logic. I recommend removal of the deletion tag.
Akshatver (
talk)
11:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) Akshatver —
Akshatver (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
KeepThe article is well referenced now as additional third party citations have been added. The disclaimer entered in the India Water Portal article is to protect it from litigation and not because there is no peer review. There is moderation and editing before an article is published in India Water Portal. So there is enough reliable citation in support of the article.
Xavier2209 (
talk)
17:49, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Xavier2209 —
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
Additional Note for the closing administratorThere is no pressure to keep. The words used to favour keeping do not constitute pressure but are opinions expressed without any ulterior motive whatsoever. A genuine effort is being made to broaden the knowledge base. Even if the article does get deleted from Wikipedia it will not affect the further development of the subject in theory and practice will it?!!! Eventually the decision will be taken in accordance with well settled policy. Policy is paramount and not the number of votes so there is no question of canvassing. If the closing administrator feels that the independent sources cited are insufficient or not up to the mark, the article will be deleted and that is that. Where is the need for acrimony?
Xavier2209 (
talk) 08:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Xavier2209 —
Xavier2209 (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
KeepThere are enough third party references to the subject of the article, some published in reputable websites and others self published. The reliability of these third party sources is being questioned by fellow editors. However, I feel that these sources are of good quality and provenance.
Akshatver (
talk)
16:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
Akshatver —
Akshatver (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. —
Akshatver (
talk •
contribs) was recently blocked or banned for
sock puppetry and is tagged to enforce policy.
The result was merge to Asgardia. Going by the arguments that mergeable content exists and that nobody has given a rationale for "not" merging Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk) 10:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. ∯WBG converse 16:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. The possibility of moving the article to a different title is left to regular move processes. RL0919 ( talk) 01:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Short unreferenced personal essay Rathfelder ( talk) 07:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:45, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable. Only biographical coverage is a book written by his wife and published by his daughter. Does not meet WP:GNG. Yunshui 雲 水 00:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
If doubt persists, I would suggest moving it into a draft. It would be incubate in draftspace. - Not logged in
Is notable. Meets
WP:GNG. Only one book published due to anonymity of activities and political conflict. Book published 20 years after death of author. Biographical information included in notable book which is stored in national library archives and used by historians in other publications and housing development in homeplace named after him. Article mentions section of book where Mitchell was offered Command of the Southern Division of Irish Free State Army by politician and general Michael Collins, which he turned down. - Not logged in — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
185.31.99.253 (
talk)
05:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
He was NOT a communist. Story re Michael Collins is untrue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8084:6A00:7D00:1DD3:1306:6BB1:CF8A ( talk) 10:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
He was not privileged. Mitchell family were lock keepers on the Grand Canal with a small piece of land. He lived with a large family in a small lock house owned by the Grand Canal Company.
He was a member of Fianna Fáil in later life.
The reference to Tim Quill is irrelevant as they had little in common and rarely if ever met.
He had no accountancy qualification.
He had little interest in religion regarding all all similar and is unlikely to have studied Newman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8084:6A00:7D00:1DD3:1306:6BB1:CF8A ( talk) 11:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. RL0919 ( talk) 00:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable author. Does not meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG. Yunshui 雲 水 00:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
If doubt persists, I would suggest moving it to draft. Incubate in draftspace. Not logged in.
Notable author. Book stored in national library and used by historians in other works. Housing development named after her in homeplace. Meets WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. Not logged in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.31.99.253 ( talk) 05:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)