![]() |
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
After I cleared out the promotional inline references, we're left with one good reference, the rest being to either where to buy the book or mere listings, not seeming to meet notability guidelines. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
<ref>Every White person in America should read this book! Sunny Nash writes the story of her childhood without preaching or ranting but she made me realize for the first time just how much skin color changes how one experiences the world. When she was just three years old her grandmother taught her how to read 'colored' and 'white only' because that was a survival skill just as important as 'Don't get in a car with strangers.' The book is remarkable. I was taught, and I teach, that skin color doesn't matter anymore than hair color. But, if your skin color is brown, it matters a great deal to a great number of people. I needed to learn that, Sunny Nash is a great teacher. By Robin (fruble@usc.edu) on October 8, 1998</ref>
The result was Delete Consensus is clear, and policy-based. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 00:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to pass either WP:PROF or WP:BIO. A google search in English returns a grant total of 2 hits [2], both to Wikipedia. A google search in Armenian returns a grant total of 7 hits [3], 6 of which are to Wikipedia. The only source cited in the article is to the memoirs by the subject's husband, possibly self-published and certainly not an independent source. Nsk92 ( talk) 22:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC) Nsk92 ( talk) 22:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
I have added additional sources from the Abaka (weekly) newspaper to provide credible evidence. Rafsta61 ( talk) 02:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Croatia–Serbia_border_dispute#Liberland_and_other_claims DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 00:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non notable "micronation". No residents. "lends (sic) are a previous Nature park and no inhabitеd forest, there are no permanent residents, the Principality have no population on the ground and any other form of government type or elections are impossible." Even a micronation must have residents. See Montevideo Convention. No recognition. Very limited media coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Even by micronation standards, this doesn't qualify. John Nagle ( talk) 22:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Upcoming film with no sources whatsoever except a couple of brief press releases about the release of the movie poster. The creator has also created articles about the actors, the director/producer, and the person whose life the film is based on; these have been speedily deleted (and recreated in draft form), with one exeption that is currently in AfD.
There are many, many movies released every year that do not meet WP:NFILM, and so far this film is among their number. If, after its release, it becomes notable, somebody who is not affiliated with it will probably write an article about it. But Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and can't include articles on the off-chance that the subject might become notable. bonadea contributions talk 21:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW keep [8]. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 01:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
This article was created initially to note the novelty of a small town electing a cat as its mayor. Further developments have demonstrated that cat was never actually never selected as the town's mayor by any process, electoral or otherwise. It is apparently just a term of endearment extended by the citizenry. It's difficult to find the proper reason for deletion, as this cat is so incredibly unworthy of an article. One editor had suggested WP:1E, but even this suggests Stubbs had a role in one event (the election?) when it fact he had a role in zero events. The totality of the story is that some townfolks in a small outpost convinced some suckers from out of town that they had elected the cat as mayor in a write-in vote. We would not have an article on the election (as it did not occur), and we surely would not have an article on the town suckering a UPI writer (who actually preceded an account of the election with "As the story goes'). Even if the election story was true, the election itself would be the article. But as the election did not occur, there is nothing remotely of encyclopedic value here. GreatCaesarsGhost ( talk) 19:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Fortunately and thankfully, an IP left a very important clue on the article's talk page that our so-called professional and "reliable" journalists failed to notice, what with their awesome fact-checking skills and all. And this particular story was written by someone who actually lives in Alaska and has easy access to the information detailed below? Amazing...As the story goes, 15 years ago several of the town residents didn't like the candidates who were running for mayor of Talkeetna, so as a joke, they encouraged enough people to elect Stubbs the cat as a write-in candidate, and he actually won.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW, WP:IAR - there is no possible chance somebody is going to salvage this article, so even though I participated in the debate and declined the original CSD A7, I'm calling this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Apparently has a claim of significance (I don't see it?) but a totally unremarkable, non-notable football club. I can find no coverage and no indication it meets any part of WP:NFOOTY. Worth noting the only sources I can find are two photos, facebook and wikimirrors. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
*Delete Couldn't find a thing
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
06:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. It looks like if anything the race may be notable; if the material of this article is needed for that please ask at WP:REFUND Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet the notability guidelines for politicians, which specifically state "Just being an elected local official,or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article." Other than running for office there doesn't seem to be another claim to notability(such as his legal or military careers). It almost reads as a bio in campaign literature.
Having examined the sources, they consist of affiliated websites(his lawfirm and campaign websites), announcements of his campaign, and name-drops in larger articles about Democratic congressional candidates in general without in depth coverage. 331dot ( talk) 08:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete or Redirect WP:POLOUTCOMES states, "Candidates who ran but never were elected for a national legislature or other national office are not viewed as having inherent notability and are often deleted or merged into lists of campaign hopefuls, such as Ontario New Democratic Party candidates, 1995 Ontario provincial election, or into articles detailing the specific race in question, such as United States Senate election in Nevada, 2010." Looking through the sources in the article, there is nothing that indicates that the subject is notable outside of the election campaign, nor has the subject received a disproportionate amount of coverage similar to Christine O'Donnell, whose campaign received international coverage. The community consensus is that the details of the specific race are notable, and most of the reliable source coverage is about the campaign, rather than the subject (or are tangential COATRACK issues). -- Enos733 ( talk) 18:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
I think this needs one more week of discussion to see if the redirect option gains any traction.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)The result was redirect to List_of_The_Transformers_(TV_series)_characters#Constructicons, where Scrapper is already listed. Lots of crufty info in this article that will not be lost to the universe after the redirect, because there is no shortage of well-attended Transformers fan wikis. I am IAR and closing this up despite the recent relist, as third relists are an extraordinary measure that shouldn't be deployed for relatively uncontroversial topics like this one. #StopTheRelistingMadness. A Train talk 19:05, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
This does not establish notability. There was really nothing put forth in the previous AfD, so not sure why that ended up as a keep result. The "Top 10 Reasons to Skip Work and Go See Transformers 2" is extremely trivial and doesn't even mention the character by name. Everything else is either primary or does not assist in establishing notability. TTN ( talk) 20:11, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2017 Badminton Asia Junior Championships. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTSTATS, as far as I can tell. No evidence of notability beyond the main championship. - Mr X 18:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Keep DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 00:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
DePRODed without addressing the issues for reason of: ...' it serves as Rojava's de facto state media and is thus deserving of having an article.' . PROD concern was: The article appears to be about an organization or web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. With the exception of primary sources the supplied sources are not about the subject. The sources do not confer notability. Fails WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
References
The result was keep. Per the uncontested sources. But this will need some cleaning for promotionalism, so tagging Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Typical corporate spam. sources like tech crunch, unreliable source for media as per standards. Light2021 ( talk) 21:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Most of the keep arguments came from four editors with very limited history, who made all of their edits in a narrow range of india-related topics, and who offer no policy-based reasoning to keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced "article" about a non-notable scion of a business family; appears to have been created by his publicist, who is demanding that we remove the no-index on the article to improve search results. Orange Mike | Talk 23:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a hoax (G3) (deleted by Bbb23). (non-admin closure) KGirl (Wanna chat?) 19:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Article is wholly unsourced and ignores facts such as that the "manager" in question was a stuffed animal for a short-lived pro-wrestling story angle. This page is effectively someone's inside joke. Goatshoes ( talk) 17:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. I am going to broadly interpret Richard3120's comment as an argument in favour of deletion -- because it certainly reads like one. Please interpret this close as a WP:SOFTDELETE and request a WP:REFUND if you can improve this article. A Train talk 13:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Contested prod, orignally done by Kudpung. See the prod notice in the page history. My name isnotdave ( talk/ contribs) 17:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual journalist and fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, No indication that subject meets notability. Many of the links provided are either dead or turn up promotional coverage, but nothing else significant. Simply being a ex journalist and current academic doesn't rise to inclusion in encyclopedic content The Columbian Journalism Librarian ( talk) 16:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
*Delete per nom. Doesn't pass
WP:JOURNALIST and page exists to to be largely self promotional.
The Columbian Journalism Librarian (
talk) 21:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC) the nominator does not vote, the nomination itself is the delete argument
Atlantic306 (
talk)
21:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
This article fails both the notability WP:N and promotion WP:PROMOTION tests. There are many, many books about paper airplanes and this one is not particularly special. Mgolden ( talk) 16:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-sound-track review(s).The critical reception section writes reviews of the song from mostly
WP:RS sections but
WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...
; which is what is happening here.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.Merge and/or Redirect to film article sought.Ping
Cyphoidbomb as someone involved in the case.
Winged Blades
Godric
17:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD, removed without any particular rationale. Unsourced article on a beach soccer team which a search (in which regard I freely admit to an inability to read Italian) only appears to give run-of-the-mill information confirming that the team exists. There is a claim to notability in that they've won a European competition, but I note that that competition also doesn't appear to have much in the way of coverage, although it's hampered by having a name that makes it a challenge to search for "cleanly". BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable tennis player. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. Adamtt9 ( talk) 02:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable tennis player. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. Adamtt9 ( talk) 02:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A Train talk 13:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable Jennica✿ / talk 04:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
non notable software. Surprisingly few reviews in a field where everything important is widely reviewed/ DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Unsure of the notability or this Jennica✿ / talk 08:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Most of the text in this article is (i) out of date and based on leaks (most of the article was written in 2012! [12]), and (ii) egregious examples of original research. The article is in such poor shape that it's beyond repair, short of deleting most of the content and starting anew. That said, there is no reason for a separate article, as any relevant content can simply be added to the 'Trans-Pacific Partnership' article. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 09:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non notable actor. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NACTOR. An anon de-PRoD'ed the article, the only award won by te actor is not much notable either. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Please propose a merge on the article's talk page . A Train talk 13:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Dictionary article Rathfelder ( talk) 11:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable organisation.Promotional intent. Winged Blades Godric 11:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
No substantial sources, just fragmentary coverage. No claim of notability. An entry in a hypothetical List of Croatian reality television programs at best. GregorB ( talk) 13:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTANARMENIANDICTIONARY KDS4444 ( talk) 15:02, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No quorum for this discussion, but no prejudice against a speedy renomination. A Train talk 13:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
This is not a notable product and it is not even expected to be produced at "commercial volume" for several years (according to article creator). Maybe it will be a notable variety of apple in the future, but doesn't seem to be now. There is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. It's a promotional article written by SPA with an apparent conflict of interest. Prod was removed by another SPA. Deli nk ( talk) 16:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Rejected PROD: no citations are about the organisation, so fails WP:GNG; a record label with very few releases all related to one band. Bondegezou ( talk) 17:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete with no prejudice to anyone creating a redirect if they think it is necessary. Hut 8.5 21:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable, cites stuff like wordpress, musicmatch (a lyric site) and that the album was "well-received by the Nepalese audience". Jennica✿ / talk 21:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails GNG - corporate promotion Atsme 📞 📧 21:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete non notable awards. Dan arndt ( talk) 02:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BOOKCRIT notability. - Mr X 22:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
WP:BLP, written as a cross between an advertorial PR profile and a résumé instead of as a proper encyclopedia article, about a photographer who may have valid claims of notability per WP:NARTIST but isn't properly sourcing them. Nearly all of the sources here are primary sources or blogs or circular referencing to other Wikipedia articles — for example, all of the "www.leclubdesad.org" footnotes (#14 through #29) are not to media coverage about him, but to archived copies of the ads he worked on. Literally the only footnote in the entire article that represents reliable source coverage about him is a 50-word blurb. As always, every photographer is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists; reliable source coverage about him in media must be present to support the notability claims for an article to become earned. Bearcat ( talk) 23:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hardwell discography. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 04:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Kleuske ( talk) 10:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately, despite my best efforts, I was unable to find enough significant coverage about this voice actress. A Japanese search wasn't of much help, and the English search wasn't much better. She has only four bolded entries (for two roles) on Anime News Network, none of which were lead roles, suggesting that she does not pass WP:ENT. As she was primarily active in the 1970s onward, it's possible that some coverage exists offline, but given the lack of roles, I'm not confident that this is the case. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 11:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:WEB, has been tagged with this problem since December 2016. Alizaa2 ( talk) 14:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per no participation herein other than from the nominator. North America 1000 14:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Tagged as a problem since September 2015. All sources are primary, and all the ones I could find are one off mentions. Delete. Alizaa2 ( talk) 14:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 03:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be a town's family history group with no discernable notability whatsoever. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Sionk ( talk) 15:16, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a musician, who has a potentially valid notability claim per WP:NMUSIC but is completely failing to reliably source it. The referencing here is based entirely on primary sources, such as her own self-published social networking content and an unreliable public relations platform, with no evidence of media coverage about her shown at all. And the base notability claim, that she had a song peak #73 in a Billboard specialty genre chart, would be enough if the article were sourced properly but is not compelling enough to hand her an automatic presumption of notability on bad sources. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source it properly, but the writing tone and sourcing here are not good enough. Bearcat ( talk) 18:22, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NMUSIC non-notable musician. The sources are simply user profiles, also fails WP:GNG. MassiveYR ♠ 19:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable martial artist - really not that impressive. PRehse ( talk) 20:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced article that has no significant coverage in reliable sources (therefore failing the WP:GNG) and should be deleted. - KAP03( Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage. Fails WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 23:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. Jdcooper has improved the article such that it no longer requires deletion. ( non-admin closure) DrStrauss talk please use {{ping|DrStrauss}} when replying 14:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Short-lived organisation which fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. No indication of significant coverage. DrStrauss talk 14:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic subject. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Reference are quick quotes, Facebook, or examples of articles. reddogsix ( talk) 14:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to America's Next Top Model (cycle 14). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person. All sources are primary. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Request by subject ticket:2017020510005638 S Philbrick (Talk) 13:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Comment - I could not get in the OTRS. I'd like to know the reasons for this nomination. STSC ( talk) 14:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Unremarkable (sadly) crim. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
*Keep It has mitigating circumstances.
The Holy Spirit of Coke (
talk) 15:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Struck sock
Mdann52 (
talk)
14:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. If anyone does want to merge this I'll be happy to restore it as a redirect for you. Hut 8.5 21:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Small immigrant group that doesn't seem to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Article about 629 people, who don't appear to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Prodded by an IP, in an apparent case of
WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. IP's rationale: Would really like to request that this page deleted, per Wikipedia's policy as such: "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete. Poorly sourced biographical articles of unknown, non-public figures, where the discussions have no editor opposing the deletion, may be deleted after discussions have been completed. If a deletion discussion of any biographical article (of whether a well known or less known individual) has received few or no comments from any editor besides the nominator, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment." Please for the love of God can we just remove this entry of Wikipedia or at least fix it to be accurate in which case the only factual thing about it is that this individual lives in Brooklyn, New York...which does not make it very notable for Wikipedia.
–
Train2104 (
t •
c)
18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 21:58, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
this is one of four main candidates for the third most important elected position in Georgia, in what will be the most important election in 2017 -- the candidate is receiving increasing coverage in English, too (there is very wide coverage in Georgian), I started this when he announced his candidacy. (Note that I am in no way connected.) I would appreciate if you give it/me a bit more time, and remove the deletion notice. Hundnase ( talk) 04:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
An unremarkable product from a small private company; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven, routine corporate news, or passing mentions such as in Forbes blog ( [17]). First AfD closed as no consensus due to low participation; the only "Keep" vote was from the article's creator ( Special:Contributions/Slbedford) with no other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not only is there a unanimous consensus to delete, the article itself is a copyvio. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails to establish notability, no third-party references. Proposed deletion was removed by article's creator. Mike Rosoft ( talk) 08:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable single by obscure band, no reliable sources, fails WP:NMG and WP:GNG. Jellyman ( talk) 07:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND JMHamo ( talk) 09:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closing as no consensus. The first keep !vote states (in part), "Notability is guarenteed [sic] for significant community infrastructure like this", but no sources were provided to qualify this stance. The second keep !vote is similar, but this user did add sources to the article starting at 15:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC) (see Revision history). However, nobody else has analyzed those source additions other than the user who added them. North America 1000 00:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
no sources for notability DGG ( talk ) 07:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The relevent guideline I was referencing is /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Hospitals For future reference Legacypac ( talk) 01:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTDIR, Wikipedia should not be an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of geographical places -- Prisencolin ( talk) 00:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No further discussion of the sources mentioned and whether they make the subject meet GNG despite relists. On a side note, per Wikipedia:Merging and WP:BEFORE you shouldn't bring articles to AfD if you only seek redirecting or merging. We have other channels for that. So Why 07:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-song reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.The critical reception section writes reviews of the songs from mostly
WP:RS sections but
WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...
; which is what is happening here.'Redirect and/or Merge to film article sought.
Winged Blades
Godric
17:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1920: The Evil Returns. There was no consensus to keep the article, nor to delete it outright; the article creator !voted twice, both times with non-policy-based objections (equating popularity with notability, for example), while the delete !vote did not address the possibilities laid out under WP:ATD-R, as the nominator requested. ( non-admin closure) — fortuna velut luna 10:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-sound-track reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.The critical reception section writes reviews of the song from mostly
WP:RS sections but
WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...
; which is what is happening here.Koimoi et al fails
WP:RS.Merge and/or Redirect to film article sought.Ping
Cyphoidbomb as someone involved in the case.
Winged Blades
Godric
17:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Keep : Major sources provides in-depth coverage to the song for passing WP:NSONG Anoptimistix Let's Talk 05:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A Train talk 13:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-sound-track reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.The critical reception section writes reviews but
WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...
; which is what is happening here.Youtube does not guarantee
WP:GNG.Redirect to film article sought.
Winged Blades
Godric
17:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2014 California wildfires. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTNEWS. There was only coverage in July 2014 when it happened and nothing more. There was also no lasting impact. SL93 ( talk) 08:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete per A7. ( non-admin closure) Greenbörg (talk) 18:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The subject received some press coverage (namechecking) but i don't see him meeting the WP's notability criterial. Saqib ( talk) 06:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. The nomination does not assert that the subject is non-notable, instead positing notability as a question. No prejudice against speedy renomination with a valid deletion rationale. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America 1000 03:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Notability? Edgars2007 ( talk/ contribs) 05:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. WP:IDONTLIKEIT, but my main concerns were as a result of confusion by references not included on the page.( non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 18:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
I believe this to be a
WP:HOAX. The
Spratly Islands page says there were no permanent settlements on the islands until 1956, and there's a variety of wild and unlikely claims in this page regarding settlements on the islands before 1956, mostly referenced to an AngelFire site.
Power~enwiki (
talk)
04:48, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person with only a single film credit as an editor. Fails WP:BIO. Sources do meet WP:VER, but make limited or trivial mention of the subject. SamHolt6 ( talk) 02:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion (G4). ( non-admin closure) AllyD ( talk) 10:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
non-notable film.fails WP:NFILM. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
After I cleared out the promotional inline references, we're left with one good reference, the rest being to either where to buy the book or mere listings, not seeming to meet notability guidelines. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:26, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
<ref>Every White person in America should read this book! Sunny Nash writes the story of her childhood without preaching or ranting but she made me realize for the first time just how much skin color changes how one experiences the world. When she was just three years old her grandmother taught her how to read 'colored' and 'white only' because that was a survival skill just as important as 'Don't get in a car with strangers.' The book is remarkable. I was taught, and I teach, that skin color doesn't matter anymore than hair color. But, if your skin color is brown, it matters a great deal to a great number of people. I needed to learn that, Sunny Nash is a great teacher. By Robin (fruble@usc.edu) on October 8, 1998</ref>
The result was Delete Consensus is clear, and policy-based. DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 00:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Does not appear to pass either WP:PROF or WP:BIO. A google search in English returns a grant total of 2 hits [2], both to Wikipedia. A google search in Armenian returns a grant total of 7 hits [3], 6 of which are to Wikipedia. The only source cited in the article is to the memoirs by the subject's husband, possibly self-published and certainly not an independent source. Nsk92 ( talk) 22:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC) Nsk92 ( talk) 22:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
I have added additional sources from the Abaka (weekly) newspaper to provide credible evidence. Rafsta61 ( talk) 02:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Croatia–Serbia_border_dispute#Liberland_and_other_claims DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 00:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non notable "micronation". No residents. "lends (sic) are a previous Nature park and no inhabitеd forest, there are no permanent residents, the Principality have no population on the ground and any other form of government type or elections are impossible." Even a micronation must have residents. See Montevideo Convention. No recognition. Very limited media coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Even by micronation standards, this doesn't qualify. John Nagle ( talk) 22:10, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Upcoming film with no sources whatsoever except a couple of brief press releases about the release of the movie poster. The creator has also created articles about the actors, the director/producer, and the person whose life the film is based on; these have been speedily deleted (and recreated in draft form), with one exeption that is currently in AfD.
There are many, many movies released every year that do not meet WP:NFILM, and so far this film is among their number. If, after its release, it becomes notable, somebody who is not affiliated with it will probably write an article about it. But Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and can't include articles on the off-chance that the subject might become notable. bonadea contributions talk 21:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was WP:SNOW keep [8]. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 01:14, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
This article was created initially to note the novelty of a small town electing a cat as its mayor. Further developments have demonstrated that cat was never actually never selected as the town's mayor by any process, electoral or otherwise. It is apparently just a term of endearment extended by the citizenry. It's difficult to find the proper reason for deletion, as this cat is so incredibly unworthy of an article. One editor had suggested WP:1E, but even this suggests Stubbs had a role in one event (the election?) when it fact he had a role in zero events. The totality of the story is that some townfolks in a small outpost convinced some suckers from out of town that they had elected the cat as mayor in a write-in vote. We would not have an article on the election (as it did not occur), and we surely would not have an article on the town suckering a UPI writer (who actually preceded an account of the election with "As the story goes'). Even if the election story was true, the election itself would be the article. But as the election did not occur, there is nothing remotely of encyclopedic value here. GreatCaesarsGhost ( talk) 19:53, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Fortunately and thankfully, an IP left a very important clue on the article's talk page that our so-called professional and "reliable" journalists failed to notice, what with their awesome fact-checking skills and all. And this particular story was written by someone who actually lives in Alaska and has easy access to the information detailed below? Amazing...As the story goes, 15 years ago several of the town residents didn't like the candidates who were running for mayor of Talkeetna, so as a joke, they encouraged enough people to elect Stubbs the cat as a write-in candidate, and he actually won.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW, WP:IAR - there is no possible chance somebody is going to salvage this article, so even though I participated in the debate and declined the original CSD A7, I'm calling this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Apparently has a claim of significance (I don't see it?) but a totally unremarkable, non-notable football club. I can find no coverage and no indication it meets any part of WP:NFOOTY. Worth noting the only sources I can find are two photos, facebook and wikimirrors. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
*Delete Couldn't find a thing
Ritchie333
(talk)
(cont)
06:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. It looks like if anything the race may be notable; if the material of this article is needed for that please ask at WP:REFUND Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet the notability guidelines for politicians, which specifically state "Just being an elected local official,or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article." Other than running for office there doesn't seem to be another claim to notability(such as his legal or military careers). It almost reads as a bio in campaign literature.
Having examined the sources, they consist of affiliated websites(his lawfirm and campaign websites), announcements of his campaign, and name-drops in larger articles about Democratic congressional candidates in general without in depth coverage. 331dot ( talk) 08:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete or Redirect WP:POLOUTCOMES states, "Candidates who ran but never were elected for a national legislature or other national office are not viewed as having inherent notability and are often deleted or merged into lists of campaign hopefuls, such as Ontario New Democratic Party candidates, 1995 Ontario provincial election, or into articles detailing the specific race in question, such as United States Senate election in Nevada, 2010." Looking through the sources in the article, there is nothing that indicates that the subject is notable outside of the election campaign, nor has the subject received a disproportionate amount of coverage similar to Christine O'Donnell, whose campaign received international coverage. The community consensus is that the details of the specific race are notable, and most of the reliable source coverage is about the campaign, rather than the subject (or are tangential COATRACK issues). -- Enos733 ( talk) 18:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
I think this needs one more week of discussion to see if the redirect option gains any traction.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)The result was redirect to List_of_The_Transformers_(TV_series)_characters#Constructicons, where Scrapper is already listed. Lots of crufty info in this article that will not be lost to the universe after the redirect, because there is no shortage of well-attended Transformers fan wikis. I am IAR and closing this up despite the recent relist, as third relists are an extraordinary measure that shouldn't be deployed for relatively uncontroversial topics like this one. #StopTheRelistingMadness. A Train talk 19:05, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
This does not establish notability. There was really nothing put forth in the previous AfD, so not sure why that ended up as a keep result. The "Top 10 Reasons to Skip Work and Go See Transformers 2" is extremely trivial and doesn't even mention the character by name. Everything else is either primary or does not assist in establishing notability. TTN ( talk) 20:11, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to 2017 Badminton Asia Junior Championships. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTSTATS, as far as I can tell. No evidence of notability beyond the main championship. - Mr X 18:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Keep DES (talk) DESiegel Contribs 00:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
DePRODed without addressing the issues for reason of: ...' it serves as Rojava's de facto state media and is thus deserving of having an article.' . PROD concern was: The article appears to be about an organization or web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. With the exception of primary sources the supplied sources are not about the subject. The sources do not confer notability. Fails WP:GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 05:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
References
The result was keep. Per the uncontested sources. But this will need some cleaning for promotionalism, so tagging Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:22, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Typical corporate spam. sources like tech crunch, unreliable source for media as per standards. Light2021 ( talk) 21:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Most of the keep arguments came from four editors with very limited history, who made all of their edits in a narrow range of india-related topics, and who offer no policy-based reasoning to keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced "article" about a non-notable scion of a business family; appears to have been created by his publicist, who is demanding that we remove the no-index on the article to improve search results. Orange Mike | Talk 23:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a hoax (G3) (deleted by Bbb23). (non-admin closure) KGirl (Wanna chat?) 19:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Article is wholly unsourced and ignores facts such as that the "manager" in question was a stuffed animal for a short-lived pro-wrestling story angle. This page is effectively someone's inside joke. Goatshoes ( talk) 17:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. I am going to broadly interpret Richard3120's comment as an argument in favour of deletion -- because it certainly reads like one. Please interpret this close as a WP:SOFTDELETE and request a WP:REFUND if you can improve this article. A Train talk 13:08, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Contested prod, orignally done by Kudpung. See the prod notice in the page history. My name isnotdave ( talk/ contribs) 17:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual journalist and fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, No indication that subject meets notability. Many of the links provided are either dead or turn up promotional coverage, but nothing else significant. Simply being a ex journalist and current academic doesn't rise to inclusion in encyclopedic content The Columbian Journalism Librarian ( talk) 16:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
*Delete per nom. Doesn't pass
WP:JOURNALIST and page exists to to be largely self promotional.
The Columbian Journalism Librarian (
talk) 21:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC) the nominator does not vote, the nomination itself is the delete argument
Atlantic306 (
talk)
21:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
This article fails both the notability WP:N and promotion WP:PROMOTION tests. There are many, many books about paper airplanes and this one is not particularly special. Mgolden ( talk) 16:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-sound-track review(s).The critical reception section writes reviews of the song from mostly
WP:RS sections but
WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...
; which is what is happening here.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.Merge and/or Redirect to film article sought.Ping
Cyphoidbomb as someone involved in the case.
Winged Blades
Godric
17:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Contested PROD, removed without any particular rationale. Unsourced article on a beach soccer team which a search (in which regard I freely admit to an inability to read Italian) only appears to give run-of-the-mill information confirming that the team exists. There is a claim to notability in that they've won a European competition, but I note that that competition also doesn't appear to have much in the way of coverage, although it's hampered by having a name that makes it a challenge to search for "cleanly". BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:03, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable tennis player. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. Adamtt9 ( talk) 02:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable tennis player. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. Adamtt9 ( talk) 02:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A Train talk 13:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable Jennica✿ / talk 04:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
non notable software. Surprisingly few reviews in a field where everything important is widely reviewed/ DGG ( talk ) 07:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Unsure of the notability or this Jennica✿ / talk 08:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Most of the text in this article is (i) out of date and based on leaks (most of the article was written in 2012! [12]), and (ii) egregious examples of original research. The article is in such poor shape that it's beyond repair, short of deleting most of the content and starting anew. That said, there is no reason for a separate article, as any relevant content can simply be added to the 'Trans-Pacific Partnership' article. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 09:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non notable actor. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NACTOR. An anon de-PRoD'ed the article, the only award won by te actor is not much notable either. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Please propose a merge on the article's talk page . A Train talk 13:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Dictionary article Rathfelder ( talk) 11:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:29, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable organisation.Promotional intent. Winged Blades Godric 11:08, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
No substantial sources, just fragmentary coverage. No claim of notability. An entry in a hypothetical List of Croatian reality television programs at best. GregorB ( talk) 13:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:30, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTANARMENIANDICTIONARY KDS4444 ( talk) 15:02, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No quorum for this discussion, but no prejudice against a speedy renomination. A Train talk 13:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
This is not a notable product and it is not even expected to be produced at "commercial volume" for several years (according to article creator). Maybe it will be a notable variety of apple in the future, but doesn't seem to be now. There is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. It's a promotional article written by SPA with an apparent conflict of interest. Prod was removed by another SPA. Deli nk ( talk) 16:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Rejected PROD: no citations are about the organisation, so fails WP:GNG; a record label with very few releases all related to one band. Bondegezou ( talk) 17:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete with no prejudice to anyone creating a redirect if they think it is necessary. Hut 8.5 21:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable, cites stuff like wordpress, musicmatch (a lyric site) and that the album was "well-received by the Nepalese audience". Jennica✿ / talk 21:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails GNG - corporate promotion Atsme 📞 📧 21:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete non notable awards. Dan arndt ( talk) 02:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:BOOKCRIT notability. - Mr X 22:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
WP:BLP, written as a cross between an advertorial PR profile and a résumé instead of as a proper encyclopedia article, about a photographer who may have valid claims of notability per WP:NARTIST but isn't properly sourcing them. Nearly all of the sources here are primary sources or blogs or circular referencing to other Wikipedia articles — for example, all of the "www.leclubdesad.org" footnotes (#14 through #29) are not to media coverage about him, but to archived copies of the ads he worked on. Literally the only footnote in the entire article that represents reliable source coverage about him is a 50-word blurb. As always, every photographer is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because he exists; reliable source coverage about him in media must be present to support the notability claims for an article to become earned. Bearcat ( talk) 23:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Hardwell discography. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 04:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Kleuske ( talk) 10:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately, despite my best efforts, I was unable to find enough significant coverage about this voice actress. A Japanese search wasn't of much help, and the English search wasn't much better. She has only four bolded entries (for two roles) on Anime News Network, none of which were lead roles, suggesting that she does not pass WP:ENT. As she was primarily active in the 1970s onward, it's possible that some coverage exists offline, but given the lack of roles, I'm not confident that this is the case. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 11:01, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:WEB, has been tagged with this problem since December 2016. Alizaa2 ( talk) 14:09, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per no participation herein other than from the nominator. North America 1000 14:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Tagged as a problem since September 2015. All sources are primary, and all the ones I could find are one off mentions. Delete. Alizaa2 ( talk) 14:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mojo Hand ( talk) 03:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be a town's family history group with no discernable notability whatsoever. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Sionk ( talk) 15:16, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a musician, who has a potentially valid notability claim per WP:NMUSIC but is completely failing to reliably source it. The referencing here is based entirely on primary sources, such as her own self-published social networking content and an unreliable public relations platform, with no evidence of media coverage about her shown at all. And the base notability claim, that she had a song peak #73 in a Billboard specialty genre chart, would be enough if the article were sourced properly but is not compelling enough to hand her an automatic presumption of notability on bad sources. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write and source it properly, but the writing tone and sourcing here are not good enough. Bearcat ( talk) 18:22, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
fails WP:NMUSIC non-notable musician. The sources are simply user profiles, also fails WP:GNG. MassiveYR ♠ 19:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable martial artist - really not that impressive. PRehse ( talk) 20:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:01, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced article that has no significant coverage in reliable sources (therefore failing the WP:GNG) and should be deleted. - KAP03( Talk • Contributions • Email) 21:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
I found no significant coverage. Fails WP:N. SL93 ( talk) 23:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. Jdcooper has improved the article such that it no longer requires deletion. ( non-admin closure) DrStrauss talk please use {{ping|DrStrauss}} when replying 14:56, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Short-lived organisation which fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. No indication of significant coverage. DrStrauss talk 14:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic subject. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 07:33, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Reference are quick quotes, Facebook, or examples of articles. reddogsix ( talk) 14:46, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to America's Next Top Model (cycle 14). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person. All sources are primary. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Request by subject ticket:2017020510005638 S Philbrick (Talk) 13:05, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Comment - I could not get in the OTRS. I'd like to know the reasons for this nomination. STSC ( talk) 14:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Unremarkable (sadly) crim. TheLongTone ( talk) 15:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
*Keep It has mitigating circumstances.
The Holy Spirit of Coke (
talk) 15:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Struck sock
Mdann52 (
talk)
14:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. If anyone does want to merge this I'll be happy to restore it as a redirect for you. Hut 8.5 21:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Small immigrant group that doesn't seem to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Article about 629 people, who don't appear to have been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Cordless Larry ( talk) 17:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Prodded by an IP, in an apparent case of
WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. IP's rationale: Would really like to request that this page deleted, per Wikipedia's policy as such: "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete. Poorly sourced biographical articles of unknown, non-public figures, where the discussions have no editor opposing the deletion, may be deleted after discussions have been completed. If a deletion discussion of any biographical article (of whether a well known or less known individual) has received few or no comments from any editor besides the nominator, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment." Please for the love of God can we just remove this entry of Wikipedia or at least fix it to be accurate in which case the only factual thing about it is that this individual lives in Brooklyn, New York...which does not make it very notable for Wikipedia.
–
Train2104 (
t •
c)
18:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:07, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 21:58, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
this is one of four main candidates for the third most important elected position in Georgia, in what will be the most important election in 2017 -- the candidate is receiving increasing coverage in English, too (there is very wide coverage in Georgian), I started this when he announced his candidacy. (Note that I am in no way connected.) I would appreciate if you give it/me a bit more time, and remove the deletion notice. Hundnase ( talk) 04:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
An unremarkable product from a small private company; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven, routine corporate news, or passing mentions such as in Forbes blog ( [17]). First AfD closed as no consensus due to low participation; the only "Keep" vote was from the article's creator ( Special:Contributions/Slbedford) with no other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:50, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Not only is there a unanimous consensus to delete, the article itself is a copyvio. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:58, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails to establish notability, no third-party references. Proposed deletion was removed by article's creator. Mike Rosoft ( talk) 08:18, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable single by obscure band, no reliable sources, fails WP:NMG and WP:GNG. Jellyman ( talk) 07:58, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) f e minist 09:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBAND JMHamo ( talk) 09:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Closing as no consensus. The first keep !vote states (in part), "Notability is guarenteed [sic] for significant community infrastructure like this", but no sources were provided to qualify this stance. The second keep !vote is similar, but this user did add sources to the article starting at 15:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC) (see Revision history). However, nobody else has analyzed those source additions other than the user who added them. North America 1000 00:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
no sources for notability DGG ( talk ) 07:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The relevent guideline I was referencing is /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Hospitals For future reference Legacypac ( talk) 01:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 11:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTDIR, Wikipedia should not be an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of geographical places -- Prisencolin ( talk) 00:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No further discussion of the sources mentioned and whether they make the subject meet GNG despite relists. On a side note, per Wikipedia:Merging and WP:BEFORE you shouldn't bring articles to AfD if you only seek redirecting or merging. We have other channels for that. So Why 07:37, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-song reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.The critical reception section writes reviews of the songs from mostly
WP:RS sections but
WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...
; which is what is happening here.'Redirect and/or Merge to film article sought.
Winged Blades
Godric
17:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1920: The Evil Returns. There was no consensus to keep the article, nor to delete it outright; the article creator !voted twice, both times with non-policy-based objections (equating popularity with notability, for example), while the delete !vote did not address the possibilities laid out under WP:ATD-R, as the nominator requested. ( non-admin closure) — fortuna velut luna 10:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-sound-track reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.The critical reception section writes reviews of the song from mostly
WP:RS sections but
WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...
; which is what is happening here.Koimoi et al fails
WP:RS.Merge and/or Redirect to film article sought.Ping
Cyphoidbomb as someone involved in the case.
Winged Blades
Godric
17:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Speedy Keep : Major sources provides in-depth coverage to the song for passing WP:NSONG Anoptimistix Let's Talk 05:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A Train talk 13:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-sound-track reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings.The critical reception section writes reviews but
WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...
; which is what is happening here.Youtube does not guarantee
WP:GNG.Redirect to film article sought.
Winged Blades
Godric
17:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2014 California wildfires. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NOTNEWS. There was only coverage in July 2014 when it happened and nothing more. There was also no lasting impact. SL93 ( talk) 08:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Speedy delete per A7. ( non-admin closure) Greenbörg (talk) 18:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
The subject received some press coverage (namechecking) but i don't see him meeting the WP's notability criterial. Saqib ( talk) 06:01, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. The nomination does not assert that the subject is non-notable, instead positing notability as a question. No prejudice against speedy renomination with a valid deletion rationale. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America 1000 03:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Notability? Edgars2007 ( talk/ contribs) 05:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. WP:IDONTLIKEIT, but my main concerns were as a result of confusion by references not included on the page.( non-admin closure) Power~enwiki ( talk) 18:24, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
I believe this to be a
WP:HOAX. The
Spratly Islands page says there were no permanent settlements on the islands until 1956, and there's a variety of wild and unlikely claims in this page regarding settlements on the islands before 1956, mostly referenced to an AngelFire site.
Power~enwiki (
talk)
04:48, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person with only a single film credit as an editor. Fails WP:BIO. Sources do meet WP:VER, but make limited or trivial mention of the subject. SamHolt6 ( talk) 02:32, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion (G4). ( non-admin closure) AllyD ( talk) 10:02, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
non-notable film.fails WP:NFILM. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)