![]() |
The result was keep, withdrawn with the only support for the delete being based on the withdrawn OTRS request. — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
OTRS Team Member ( verify) - The subject of this article has requested deletion, via OTRS (Ticket# 2016052010015078). Procedurally opening this discussion to allow the community to decide if this article meets the necessary criteria for deletion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedied per WP:CSD#G3 among other issues. FWIW I do not believe that IPs should be able to decline CSDs.. Rs chen 7754 18:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Twice declined CSD. Unsourced and fails WP:GNG. Georgia DOT maps, which would be an authoritative source on if this road is on the state highway system, show this as a county-maintained road. – Fredddie ™ 22:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
advertising The Banner talk 22:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 08:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
List of candidates to a not notable pageant. The representatives aren't notable either. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Created by now-blocked sock, but not eligible for CSD because he wasn't blocked when this was created. Received some coverage for winning a national teaching award, but that's WP:BLP1E. ~ Rob Talk 21:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
BLP of a college student who has written some blog articles. Does not appear to meet notability standards. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
This article does meet with the WP:GNG and WP:V. I think the user above clarified the reliability of the sources - I do not think we can question those. On the other hand, if we check the average page notability in Wikipedia and the notability rules, we can see that the subject does surpass both.— 78.92.88.214 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 18:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC).
Unless this discussion opens again, it is concluded that this article does not qualify for deletion.— 145.90.65.112 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 15:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC).
About Fran Villalba and Fran Villalba Segarra. Do you honestly believe that it's more notable a guy who played a few minutes for Valencia, than a guy who has two baccalaureates, is studying in the 4th best business University in Europe and plays a key role in the biggest free web hosting provider, both at a young age? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gsgsf343 (
talk •
contribs)
07:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC) — Duplicate vote:
Gsgsf343 (
talk •
contribs) has already cast a vote above.
Added reference to Tendencias21.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.90.65.112 ( talk) 10:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC) Added reference to infolibre.es, one of the biggest Spanish newspapers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.90.65.112 ( talk) 19:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN as an unsuccessful candidate, and creation prior to an election is problematic as is suggests free advertising. Despite the long list of references, the subject is not notable for anything else, either. St Anselm ( talk) 20:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Insert CleverPhrase Here 22:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not pass the guidelines outlined at WP:Notability (organizations and companies), nor does it independently qualify for WP:GNG. Only ref is primary. Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Insert CleverPhrase Here 22:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not pass the guidelines outlined at WP:Notability (organizations and companies), nor does it independently qualify for WP:GNG. Ro references. Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Insert CleverPhrase Here 21:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not pass the guidelines outlined at WP:Notability (organizations and companies), nor does it independently qualify for WP:GNG. Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. There is nothing to prevent anyone redirecting if they think there is a good reason to do so. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable actress. Quis separabit? 19:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Robidoux family. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 03:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
A number of articles on non-notable members of the Robidoux family have been created, because some descendants of them became notable. This violates WP:NOTGENEALOGY and the basic notability guidelines for biographies.
Manuel or Emmanuel Robidoux (or Robidou as he is also noted in genalogies) is not the subject of significant attention in reliable, independent sources, he only appears in genealogies. The same applies to the following members of the family (all nominated for deletion for the same reason):
Note that the apparent main source for these articles is a book published by Trafford Publishing, a publish-on-demand service.
Fram ( talk) 14:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
I did not know that my major reference was self-published, but it was used as sources for the Robidoux brothers (sons of Joseph III), and hopefully they are not also targets for deletion. Nevertheless, this book seems to be well researched and sourced. If you read the Preface and Introduction of this book, you can see why this is a family is of interest. The book seems to be based on legitimate research, with 30 pages of bibliography and nearly 200 pages of footnotes. One reader has pointed me to a newer book, The Brothers Robidoux and the Opening of the American West by Joseph Willoughby, published by the University of Missouri in 2012, which I have ordered and will use to update the articles, should they survive.
As the the comment above on Montanabw statement, I'm puzzled. Both Joseph Robidoux and his sons are mentioned in Meriwether Lewis' note (which I would like to find out more about), and the article in question says the Joseph III and his sons worked for the American Fur Company. It seems to me that the questionable word "some" is actually correct in this context.
Merge. I just looked at the Willoughby book on Google Books and it seems like there is enough material to justify a separate article on Joseph III. (He starts his book with Joseph III and doesn't say much about the ancestors.) Of the other five articles, Andre has the most information, the others not so much. I would propose merging the five into a single article under Andre's moniker since that traces the family from France to New France to America (Joseph II came to St. Louis with his son and promptly died). I should get the Willoughby book next week and can update references. There should be some good information to update the articles on the Robidoux sons also.
I took a stab at the consolidated article on the Robidoux family, leaving Joseph Robidoux III as a stand-alone for the time being. Just a first cut and I'll look at it again tomorrow when my brain is refreshed. Any comments are appreciated. Dr. Grampinator ( talk) 23:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 02:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORG, mainly WP:PROMO, and no assertion of notability. This was closed "no consensus" previously, but the article should either be deleted or redirected to Northern Central Railway, where a sufficient statement about it already exists. The article asserts notability via sources by conflating the Civil War-era history of the Northern Central Railway (which was a Class I interstate railroad from PA to MD that eventually had 380 miles of track) with the fact that this organization runs a ten-mile trip over a piece of the same line. They aren't related entities; Conrail absorbed Northern Central in 1976, which means this group is simply operating abandoned track as of 2013. All the local news covers the opening of the attraction, but all the NYT and major outlet coverage is about the Civil War era railroad, not the organization. Were that history to be trimmed out, only PROMO would be left. MSJapan ( talk) 18:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
MSJapan ( talk) 18:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Minor character in the Transformers universe. No evidence of real-world notability. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
No independent third-party sources, fails WP:GNG. Prod removed by article creator. shoy ( reactions) 18:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unconvincing non-policy based Keep arguments. J04n( talk page) 13:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Promotionally written violation of ONEEVENT DGG ( talk ) 17:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
— AlexandraMichelleMarkus ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— PatrickMtz97 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep: Avi Dorfman has overcome incredible odds. His story of recovery from such a severe injury is an inspiration to many others who find themselves facing similar challenges. His exposure of the problems at UCLA was also extremely important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KarenJD01 ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
— KarenJD01 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep: He's well-known in Israel for his actions during the Zikim attack, and the other things described are notable. The article is sourced and meets normal Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minjitthemidget ( talk • contribs) 08:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep: No doubt about it, he’s well known, his story is well known and of common interest. The article is well sourced and well written. It is only malicious attacks that seek to take it down. Brianoflondon ( talk) 08:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep The subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Parts of the article should be edited for style. Adamreinman ( talk) 10:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Biography of a prep school headmaster, making and sourcing no credible claim of greater notability than the norm among the thousands of other such people who have also existed over the years. The referencing here relies on a single news article in the local newspaper, and the school's own primary source website about itself, and the writing tone skews in a surprisingly advertorial direction for a guy who's dead. None of this suggests that he warrants an encyclopedia article for it. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 16:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
How many damn references do you want? Wikipedia is a place to research all topics thats what makes it unique and unlike other websites and encyclopedias it lets random people from all around the world share information on different topics not for them to come share information and have it taken down. DO NOT REMOVE
The result was delete. Consensus that the subject is not notable after relisting. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Kvng with the following rationale "depth of coverage is debatable, this is not an uncontroversial deletion, please use WP:AFD". I do not consider coverage here to be sufficient. 16 references but they don't seem to be sufficient. They have reliability issues - and that's discounting several which are very much self-published (PR announcements from company's own blog, etc.). Many of the reminder are niche online trade journals-like equivalents. And many focus on routine coverage ("startups that got fnding this week are..."), or are based on rewriting company's PR stuff (ex. [23]: "Finland-based mobile social gaming network Star Arcade has announced its games have been downloaded more than 5 million times.... Source: http://www.star-arcade.com/corporate/view/press/StarArcade-5milliondownloadsPressRelease-18July2011.pdf )". The company seems to have been nominated or won some awards which however are niche and don't establish notability. There are As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dreezy. General consensus is to redirect after two relists, as the nominator suggested. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 00:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable song: Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Songs should only have an individual article when there is enough material to warrant a detailed article,{{ R from song}} per WP:NMUSIC so as a valid search term the article should be redirected to Dreezy. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 08:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Actor with questionable notability. From what I can tell he has only done 2 films (one uncredited according to the IMDB even-which the film does not even have a page on here, checked its English title and nope does not have one either which both have people link to) Anyway, I say delete. Wgolf ( talk) 02:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Discussion can continue on talk page as to where to move to J04n( talk page) 19:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Event won't be played by this name due to Cadillac no longer sponsoring per this [24]. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
BLP1E Article fails to show notabilty, except for the fact that he's in jail and a white supremist. Delete recommended. KoshVorlon 16:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
per WP:PROMOTION, fails WP:GNG. Sophia91 ( talk) 15:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. with default to keep J04n( talk page) 19:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Another new boxing organization. The only reference is to its own home page. I don't know why this article contains a list of another organization's champions--unless the organization just figured using someone else's champions is easier than creating their own. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Submitting for deletion discussion after an IP-editor contested both WP:BSD and WP:PROD. The article’s subject lacks basic notability, and most of its claims are either unsourced or dubious. The subject is an unimportant yellow paper showbiz celebrity in Finland, and the producer of three self-funded short films distributed on YouTube. The subject is totally unknown internationally.
In Finland the subject was best known for his “golden Mercedes”, one of only three in the world as he claimed, which later became confirmed to be is a standard 2005 MB500S, with golden foil and a spoiler kit. The article has already been removed once, but has reappeared, with unpublished details that could origin only from the subject himself. Caygill ( talk) 16:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
— 108.0.216.67 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— 45.48.227.170 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
User talk:Vipinhari#
The result was delete. A clear consensus for deletion. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Possible hoax. Searching for "Civilian Defense Agency" gives about 80 hits, almost all about defense agencies that are civilian. The article makes it appear as if this is a US government agency, but the website is a single page at a .us address, not a .gov address. The homepage states "Providing contract defense services for military, foreign aid workers, shipping services and more", suggesting perhaps that this is a company, not a government agency. The only hit on Google that is not generic, is this one, which refers to a Texas-based "Civilian Defense Agency, Inc." Whatever this is, a government agency or a company, the lack of sources (reliable or not) indicates a lack of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CORP, or WP:ORG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 15:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Further information is being supplied - A FCC lookup of another FRN associated with the CDA at https://apps.fcc.gov/coresWeb/searchDetail.do?frn=0025608365 shows the agency listed as a government agency. Sources are available to indicate this is noteworthy in the interest of government transparency and how it conducts business. Additionally, as the article states, the headquarters are in Virginia and the Training facility in South Texas so I assume they have licensed radios for use in training and public service.
To the original complainant Mr. Kitty - this is my fist contribution and you haven't even given it a chance to develop. I appreciate your diligence but your request for deletion is not only premature and without proper research but also acting a a tool to suppress information about agencies operating within the confines of the U.S. under authority of U.S. based agencies and operating in a clandestine manner.
If you look at the CIA for example, it is a "CIVILIAN" based entity yet with government authority - an oxymoron in verbiage. I have discovered the CDA is positioned similar and the structure is complex and I truly believe this is noteworthy. I have spoken with a source from the CDA when I had seen personally their personnel in the area. I spoke to one of their personnel and they gave me info I researched and verified. I am gathering information and reporting as I find it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giosue725 ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I listed one of 10 FRN's I found above... A FCC lookup of another FRN associated with the CDA at https://apps.fcc.gov/coresWeb/searchDetail.do?frn=0025608365
Additionally, the article is pretty clear as to their status - I was clear in relaying that I am not sure of the government status in the article since there is conflicting information but with government FRN's I know by that they are operation within some form of governmental authority and I only reported information that was given directly to me and corroborated with in-depth research - not some simple "google" search. I worked in intelligence for 15 years so while I am sure you have the best intention, I would speculate your investigatory prowess is not within the realm of being able to uncover clandestine operations. My intent is to not only uncover this operation but several others I have found throughout my career. In my opinion I believe people have a right to know what is really going on.
Also, regarding the site, just last week it was up and multi-page with quite a bit of info. I can only assume they are updating as the site reports but I don't know since I don't work for their IT department...
I agree than in researching tax filings, I find CDA in Texas, Virginia the Carolinas and several other places. Some listed as CDA holdings and others as CDA, Inc. and some with simply Civilian Defense Agency, that their status is a bit confusing. It is obviously large and recently came out of the shadow - I find it curious as to why so the article reports what I know so far. Perhaps if given the chance others who know more can contribute.
Like I said, I admire your dedication to helping keep Wikipedia a source of reliable knowledge but I still most humbly believe you did little to no research and prematurely requested deletion which is a disservice to the Wikipedia community.
Kind regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giosue725 ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
First, a bit of background is in order:
Which takes us to the present article, a list of prefects of one Romanian county. I would say it should be deleted for two reasons: first, no individual on the list (except for one, who held a similar but distinct position before the area became a part of Romania) is notable or likely ever will be notable, and it says something about the notability of a list when all the entries are perpetual red links. Second, the topic itself lacks notability: the office is of a routine bureaucratic nature, a list of its holders beyond our scope.
I suppose, if there's a real desire for accessibility to this information, a link to the list could be added to Brașov County - I for one would not object. - Biruitorul Talk 15:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
This is an article for somebody best known for being kidnapped by aliens. The sourcing is a train-wreck of WP:BLPSOURCES-violating tabloid journalism, or otherwise just plain old "stuff on the internet", and it's saying something when the most respectable sources are The Sun and The Daily Mail. While she might be a colourful figure to listen to (if you're into that sort of thing), I can't see how this is a realistic subject for an encyclopedia. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Imelda Marcos. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
4 not very notable awards do not justify this article which was created by a SPA. Pincrete ( talk) 14:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Can't think of an appropriate AfD tag...I don't see this as a notable topic, and the almost total lack of content does not persuade me otherwise. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable radio personality lacking non-trivial support. Not sure the award provides enough to support WP:N. Borders on advert. Article created by subject's intern and edited by subject. reddogsix ( talk) 13:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
'Youngest Profesional Band' according to the Guiness Book of Pointless Trivia oops, records. This is obviously a claim of notability, but one that is liable to vanish into thin air..."They were once in the GBPT but can no longer stake the claim" seems likely given time and obviously is a very slender claim to notability. There is nothing else of substance to suggest notability. And the band are hardly new...
TheLongTone (
talk)
13:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep The Band passes notability guidelines for music bands. Moreover Guiness Book of Records is a World Record, None in the world like them, it makes them more notable. Akuhiltyion ( talk) 21:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete I have to say that there is no particular reason to keep the page. The notability is not there, there are no current news stories and even the page itself is lackluster and devoid of pertinent information about the band. Kaobear ( talk) 12:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The "delete" arguments are strongly based in Wikipedia policies and guidelines, while the "keep" arguments aren't. Several of the "keep" arguments amount to saying either that amphoras of this type are collectively notable as a class or that some amphoras are notable, not that this particular one is notable in its own right. Then we have "it gets 78 hits on Google": even if the number of google hits were a measure of notability (which it isn't) 78 would be a derisory number. Then we have a link to a book which gives a brief three sentence mention of the amphora, in a passage primarily about another one. It is not Bearcat who "seems to misunderstand the GNG". The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Article about a museum artifact, which simply describes its physical characteristics. No indication whatosever is given here of what would make it uniquely deserving of its own encyclopedia article, over all of the hundreds or thousands of other amphoras that are held in other museums around the world -- and the only source here is one deadlinked entry in an online directory of museum accessions. As always, Wikipedia is not a directory of every single thing that exists at all -- but nothing here suggests or sources any reason why an encyclopedia should maintain an article about it. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 13:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Declined Prod. Delete reason was "Lots of history, but not enough notability (the best is an article in a college newspaper)". Prod declined with "Notable for charting albums, will add refs", but sadly nothing was added (this was more than 2 months ago) and I can't find evidence of said chart success. Fram ( talk) 12:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. I can't access source 1 (a who's who) and 2 (a specialist directory), source 3 is about another priest where Raphael is quoted at length but isn't the subject of any attention about him, source 4 is a passing mention, and source 5 I can't access but is a section of routine reporting. Many other passing mentions can be found online, but nothing that looks to be significantly about him. Fram ( talk) 12:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Prod declined without an actual reason or improvements. Fram ( talk) 12:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 00:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This biographical article is about a software engineer who I believe is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Although references are given for this person, it does not point to notability, in my view. Seaweed ( talk) 12:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a football player, who has to date only made the practice squad of an NFL team. WP:NGRIDIRON, however, does not confer notability until they've actually played at least one game in the main league, and the sourcing here is not strong enough to get him over WP:GNG as a substitute. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if he gets called up to the big time. Bearcat ( talk) 22:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 08:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a dancer, whose most substantive claim of notability is having appeared in music videos -- and who is sourced entirely to YouTube copies of said videos, with no evidence of any reliable source coverage about her in media shown at all. But a dancer gets into Wikipedia by being the subject of published coverage which satisfies WP:GNG, and does not gain an automatic entitlement to have a Wikipedia article just because user-generated video sharing or social networking sites verify that she exists. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 21:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1998 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1982 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1998 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2010 Asian Beach Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2008 Asian Beach Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2010 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Redirect per WP:BOLD to 2014 Asian Games. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2007 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1994 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1990 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1982 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1978 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1998 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1974 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. 2013 Asian Youth Games (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1951 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. czar 13:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. 2009 Asian Indoor Games (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 60 Days In. How search engines do their autocompletion isn't a criteria for whether wikipedia has an article or not. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a television personality, author and actress, which makes no strong claim of notability for any of those endeavours: it simply asserts that she exists and sources that existence only to IMDb and a sales page for her book on amazon.com, with no evidence of reliable source coverage in media shown at all. Neither being in a reality show nor writing a book are automatic notability freebies that entitle a person to an article in and of themselves -- reliable source coverage has to be present to get the topic over the bar. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 13:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor - does not meet either WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. A series of recent minor roles. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 00:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Since its creation seven years ago, there has been no production of independent reliable sources to verify the claims in the article or to assert that the subject is notable. — ξ xplicit 10:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Also I have a scanned copy of her interview dated 16th May 2016 in a Main news paper in Colombo Sri Lanka Where she currently is ( I am not sure how to upload this here This article can be read at http://www.pressreader.com/sri-lanka/daily-mirror-sri-lanka/20150516/281913066690512/TextView I am not sure but you may have to login to view this) . She also has appeared on national television channel on 21st May 2016.
Mcolombowala ( talk) 13:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I have photo of the article ( Can I email that to someone for verification?) and you may have to login to view the text. It is easy as they accept facebook/google+ login. I found one link about her giving a workshop in University http://www.sjp.ac.lk/wcup/m_workshop.php Mcolombowala ( talk) 15:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Added 2 links to Newspaper and 2 Links of University. Also 2 external links of Youtube talks which are not self published which has been given here as a reference to the authenticity of the person in question. Vem Khema has appeared on local TV station Dharmavahini in 2012 but currently the TeleVision Channel has closed down. I found a link with the archived talks ( http://www.learntv.lk/video/bhavana/english/) at the end it shows the credits. In total 8 talks are available to see. The other thing is we are not having the schedule of the airing of the talks, Please suggest if this link can be used as a citation for her Wikipage. Mcolombowala ( talk) 15:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
The subject does not exist. The term "Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases Community" seems like an attempt to encompass the entirety of patients with rare and undiagnosed disorders, however the term occurs only on a single website (see Google search) where it is used as a rhetorical phrase rather than to designate an actual community. Article content partially overlaps with rare disease. — kashmiri TALK 10:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. One month at AfD, three relists and still no clear consensus on what to do. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 00:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Koala15 ( talk) 16:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Tom29739 [ talk 19:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep - although there isn't really a notability guideline under either WP:NMUSIC or WP:NFILM to cover music video directors specifically, this guy has shot videos for a lot of notable artists (see the number of bluelinked acts) in a particular sector that doesn't get a lot of mainstream coverage, but within the specialised hip hop field there are plenty of citations backing up the claims on his filmography (search for either "Charles Robinson" or "Charles M. Robinson" on sites like Hip Hop On Deck, Hip Hop Inquirer, Hot New Hip Hop etc.) The article as it stands needs work - more prose and less lists! - but I'd contend that since if we were talking about a rap artist rather than a rap video director he'd pass WP:NMUSIC with these same credits and this same coverage, just because we don't have specific guidelines for this kind of situation, I'd argue the GNG is satisfied here. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 13:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to 2016 Ohio machete attack. J04n( talk page) 00:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. I cannot access most of the sources as they are behind a proquest pay wall. Non notable, only playing as a backup singer or singing cover songs. One book doesn't make him pass WP:NAUTHOR either. Gbawden ( talk) 11:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
*Comment - I won't give an official vote yet until more votes are in, partially out of fear that
E.M.Gregory will accuse me of
WP:WIKIHOUNDING again (which I have no patience for). However, I do feel like this article gives
a bit of an undue weight on his involvement in stopping the attack, which I assume is where most of the sources on him will be coming from. Maybe this article could benefit from some more expansion on his musical career and/or that book of his?
Parsley Man (
talk)
21:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep. Nominator breached interaction ban. Fences& Windows 22:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Irrelevant song which produced no noteworthy awards or chart positions. Band itself is hardly worth mention. ALongStay ( talk) 02:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Garagepunk don't talk to me about self-righteousness, I've seem just a taste of your responses to other editors. You treat this like you're making some last stand. I made my reasons why to delete this article and other editors clearly agreed. I'm not going to respond to you anymore unless it is about the song or it is about something civil. Goodbye. ALongStay ( talk) 22:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject is not sufficiently notable for an article in the encyclopedia. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
An eye surgeon who has attended conferences, gives tips on eye care and has been involved in unfortunate litigation. None of this adds up to notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 08:53, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk)
No evidence of any special notability. The BBC refs shos that he is a journalist and the Leeds Trinity report is simply an update an an alumnus. Neither establish any notability. This is an ordinary jobbing TV journalist - probably good at his job but not notable in Wikipedia terms Velella Velella Talk 08:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete No obvious notability. Seaweed ( talk) 12:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fan_fiction#Songfic. J04n( talk page) 00:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This article does not meet criteria for notability (does not have significant coverage in reliable sources, one source, no notable google results). Mr. Spink talk★ contribs 15:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
trivial accomplishments: co-ed. of medium importancet anthologies, but thats not enough for WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR DGG ( talk ) 07:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
This article does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements for actors WP:NACTOR. This actor has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. (Simply uttering one or two lines;having a very small role in a few productions does not mean the actor is noteworthy). This actors does not have a large or significant fan base or "cult" following. This actor has not made any unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. There are no external sources, such as newspaper or magazine articles that have given this actor any coverage. -- Alaindrouin ( talk) 16:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Edit -- Alaindrouin ( talk) 17:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Despite the article existing for a while, there are no secondary sources to back up the actor's notability. Aside from the IMDB and self-promotional Fountainhead link, no information to speak of. Fails WP:NACTOR. If any entertainer who has appeared in films with actual notable people deserves their own article then we just might as well have an article for every non-extra performer regardless of his/her prominence. KelseyWill ( talk) 23:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Women's pro wrestler with no significant independent coverage. Only links are to results or her own pages. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete There are some secondary links to bodybuilding competitions but definitely lacks notability as per WP:ENT. Maybe some regional or local notability but nowhere near enough to meet Wikipedia's standards. KelseyWill ( talk) 00:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Found this through Special:Random. Funnily enough, I deleted it before, only to undelete it because he'd gotten a minor award that (in my opinion at the time) was enough to disqualify him for A7. So a woman in a burning building throws her baby to a guy on the street below, and the guy gets on all the news programs for a few days. Article-worthy? Not at all. For someone like this, Google hits are relevant; I've gotten through fifty Google hits without finding even one that mentions this guy. Nyttend ( talk) 02:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Poorly sourced article about a one-off smalltown film festival with no demonstrated claim of notability per WP:EVENT -- and while this article claims that "a second edition is set for July 2014", that's now almost two years into the past but I can find no reliably sourced indication that it ever actually happened. As always, an event like this is not automatically entitled to permanent coverage in an encyclopedia just because it existed -- it must be the subject of sufficient RS coverage to get it over a notability criterion. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 06:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Opportunity for rework per suggestions in discussion (non-admin closure) — crh 23 ( Talk) 16:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
This page was created by a now blocked sock. I could find no coverage outside of routine "elections are taking place" or "person X is now in office". Where there is coverage, it's about the people holding the office or an election, not the political office itself. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. ~ Rob Talk 06:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. On a procedural note, this discussion was difficult to understand, mostly because of
this edit. The best way to correct an error like that is to strike out the incorrect wording and add the correct version, so you end up with something like satisfies doesn't satisfy. As it is, we have comments in the discussion referring to text which no longer exists, which is kind of confusing to the reader (i.e. me).
The one person arguing to keep was (in part) basing their opinion on the erroneous text. It's unclear if they saw the correction and chose not to respond to it, or not. In any case, even if I assume the rest of their comment still holds, that's not enough to overcome the weight of all the other delete opinions. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
The subject doesn't satisfy the criteria under WP:PROF. Article lacks any in-depth support of individual establishing notability. Was previously subject of an AfD which was closed with a decision of no-consensus. Since that time there has been no improvement of the article or any inclusion of additional references supporting the subject's notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 05:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Miss Peru. Nakon 21:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Not a real pageant. The Banner talk 15:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 07:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Notability & source Fitindia ( talk) 10:22, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete, per WP:SOFTDELETE-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Other than that this TV channel exists and a number of people enjoy watching it, there appears to be nothing notable about it. Other than the novelty of being related to game shows, this seems like a run-of-the-mill type institution among many competing TV networks. Looking for news about it in terms of reliable sourcing appears to just generate slight, passing mentions only. This story here is typical, with all it says being: "You must use the SIM to dial a special number with the serial number of the smart-card and True Visions will allow you to watch three more channels - True Thai Film, True X-Zyte and True Movie Hits - free of charge for 12 months." Perhaps a great deal, yet not encyclopedia worthy. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 09:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merged to Berry College. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 01:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Elementary school with no evidence of any special notability. Yoshiman6464 ( talk) 03:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator I merged the information to the Berry College page. Yoshiman6464 ( talk) 18:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to IBM DB2#Technical information,. Selective merge, per Mark viking's guidance. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Dialectric with the following rationale "google books search shows numerous mentions. redirect may be in order, but that can be discussed without a prod". I am not averse to a redirect (through to where, I am not sure) but as a stand-alone article this does not seem to pass. The references do not pass muster: yes, there are mentions in books, but they are mostly in passing. The software does have a section devoted to it in several books, through rather then any analysis of significance those sections seem to be how-to-use manauls, technical and going on for a page or so. There is no single work on this topic, and few short mentions in niche textbooks don't seem to qualify for NSOFTWARE "It is the subject of multiple printed third-party manuals, instruction books, or reliable reviews". Nothing I can find supports this passing that or WP:N. Seems like software-spam, particularly considering the language (this has been tagged as an advert for 5+ years now...). I think IBM has enough adevertising budget it doesn't need us to help them - we are not the directory of software ( WP:NOTDIRECTORY). PS. Creator, of course, was a WP:SPA... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 06:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Patent nonsense. This hoax article needs to be deleted ASAP. There's absolutely no such thing as "Macedonian Pakistan". There was no such era. Pakistan was created in 1947 (incl. the name), so there was no "Pakistan" before that. On top of that, the article contains nothing more than a few links of battles Alexander fought in the area on the soil which happesn to be located on soil of what today is "Pakistan", aka the post-1947 nation. There is no reason that I can possibly think of that could merit the keeping of this nonsensical "article". Pseudo-historical nonsense at its best. The "new" user who created this article created this similarily hoax article as well (which is being AfD'd too). - LouisAragon ( talk) 02:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 06:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Patent nonsense. This hoax article needs to be deleted ASAP. There's absolutely no such thing as "Achaemenid Pakistan". Imagine titles such as "Phoenician France", "Byzantine FYROM" or "Achaemenid Romania", and what-not totally nonsensical anachronistic names. There was no such era. Pakistan was created in 1947, so there was no "Pakistan" before that. On top of that, the article contains nothing more than a few links of Achaemenid satrapies (provinces) which happen to be located on soil of what today is "Pakistan", the post-1947 nation. There is no reason that I can possibly think of that could merit the keeping of this nonsensical "article". Pseudo-historical nonsense at its best. The "new" user who created this, created this equally nonsensical article as well (which is being AfD'd as well). - LouisAragon ( talk) 01:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Local politician with some coverage in local media. Magnolia677 ( talk) 01:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Renaming / redirect to be discussed on article TalkPage. ( non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 03:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS. This gorilla was not notable in life, but is getting lots of coverage due to the specific news story of its death. – Muboshgu ( talk) 01:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that idividual should be limited to the article about that event, in proportion to their importance to the overall topic.
As such, brief bursts of news coverage may not be sufficient signs of notability, while sustained coverage would be
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Checking sources for BLP problems, I found that little checks out in this biography of an alleged Oakland Raiders player. No claim of playing a game to establish WP:NGRIDIRON notability. No reliable source evidence this player ever signed with the Raiders. (Supplied reference failed verification.) Only coverage appears to be a blog listing of top small school prospects and routine track and field results. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertising, marketing or public relations •
Arts
Rescuer
09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC) —
ArtsRescuer (
talk •
contribs) is a confirmed
sock puppet of
Shafinusri (
talk •
contribs).
![]() |
The result was keep, withdrawn with the only support for the delete being based on the withdrawn OTRS request. — David Eppstein ( talk) 16:16, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
OTRS Team Member ( verify) - The subject of this article has requested deletion, via OTRS (Ticket# 2016052010015078). Procedurally opening this discussion to allow the community to decide if this article meets the necessary criteria for deletion. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedied per WP:CSD#G3 among other issues. FWIW I do not believe that IPs should be able to decline CSDs.. Rs chen 7754 18:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Twice declined CSD. Unsourced and fails WP:GNG. Georgia DOT maps, which would be an authoritative source on if this road is on the state highway system, show this as a county-maintained road. – Fredddie ™ 22:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
advertising The Banner talk 22:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 08:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
List of candidates to a not notable pageant. The representatives aren't notable either. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Created by now-blocked sock, but not eligible for CSD because he wasn't blocked when this was created. Received some coverage for winning a national teaching award, but that's WP:BLP1E. ~ Rob Talk 21:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
BLP of a college student who has written some blog articles. Does not appear to meet notability standards. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
This article does meet with the WP:GNG and WP:V. I think the user above clarified the reliability of the sources - I do not think we can question those. On the other hand, if we check the average page notability in Wikipedia and the notability rules, we can see that the subject does surpass both.— 78.92.88.214 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 18:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC).
Unless this discussion opens again, it is concluded that this article does not qualify for deletion.— 145.90.65.112 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 15:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC).
About Fran Villalba and Fran Villalba Segarra. Do you honestly believe that it's more notable a guy who played a few minutes for Valencia, than a guy who has two baccalaureates, is studying in the 4th best business University in Europe and plays a key role in the biggest free web hosting provider, both at a young age? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gsgsf343 (
talk •
contribs)
07:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC) — Duplicate vote:
Gsgsf343 (
talk •
contribs) has already cast a vote above.
Added reference to Tendencias21.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.90.65.112 ( talk) 10:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC) Added reference to infolibre.es, one of the biggest Spanish newspapers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.90.65.112 ( talk) 19:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 13:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN as an unsuccessful candidate, and creation prior to an election is problematic as is suggests free advertising. Despite the long list of references, the subject is not notable for anything else, either. St Anselm ( talk) 20:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Insert CleverPhrase Here 22:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not pass the guidelines outlined at WP:Notability (organizations and companies), nor does it independently qualify for WP:GNG. Only ref is primary. Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Insert CleverPhrase Here 22:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not pass the guidelines outlined at WP:Notability (organizations and companies), nor does it independently qualify for WP:GNG. Ro references. Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) Insert CleverPhrase Here 21:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not pass the guidelines outlined at WP:Notability (organizations and companies), nor does it independently qualify for WP:GNG. Insert CleverPhrase Here 20:37, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. There is nothing to prevent anyone redirecting if they think there is a good reason to do so. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable actress. Quis separabit? 19:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Robidoux family. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 03:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
A number of articles on non-notable members of the Robidoux family have been created, because some descendants of them became notable. This violates WP:NOTGENEALOGY and the basic notability guidelines for biographies.
Manuel or Emmanuel Robidoux (or Robidou as he is also noted in genalogies) is not the subject of significant attention in reliable, independent sources, he only appears in genealogies. The same applies to the following members of the family (all nominated for deletion for the same reason):
Note that the apparent main source for these articles is a book published by Trafford Publishing, a publish-on-demand service.
Fram ( talk) 14:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
I did not know that my major reference was self-published, but it was used as sources for the Robidoux brothers (sons of Joseph III), and hopefully they are not also targets for deletion. Nevertheless, this book seems to be well researched and sourced. If you read the Preface and Introduction of this book, you can see why this is a family is of interest. The book seems to be based on legitimate research, with 30 pages of bibliography and nearly 200 pages of footnotes. One reader has pointed me to a newer book, The Brothers Robidoux and the Opening of the American West by Joseph Willoughby, published by the University of Missouri in 2012, which I have ordered and will use to update the articles, should they survive.
As the the comment above on Montanabw statement, I'm puzzled. Both Joseph Robidoux and his sons are mentioned in Meriwether Lewis' note (which I would like to find out more about), and the article in question says the Joseph III and his sons worked for the American Fur Company. It seems to me that the questionable word "some" is actually correct in this context.
Merge. I just looked at the Willoughby book on Google Books and it seems like there is enough material to justify a separate article on Joseph III. (He starts his book with Joseph III and doesn't say much about the ancestors.) Of the other five articles, Andre has the most information, the others not so much. I would propose merging the five into a single article under Andre's moniker since that traces the family from France to New France to America (Joseph II came to St. Louis with his son and promptly died). I should get the Willoughby book next week and can update references. There should be some good information to update the articles on the Robidoux sons also.
I took a stab at the consolidated article on the Robidoux family, leaving Joseph Robidoux III as a stand-alone for the time being. Just a first cut and I'll look at it again tomorrow when my brain is refreshed. Any comments are appreciated. Dr. Grampinator ( talk) 23:03, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 02:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:ORG, mainly WP:PROMO, and no assertion of notability. This was closed "no consensus" previously, but the article should either be deleted or redirected to Northern Central Railway, where a sufficient statement about it already exists. The article asserts notability via sources by conflating the Civil War-era history of the Northern Central Railway (which was a Class I interstate railroad from PA to MD that eventually had 380 miles of track) with the fact that this organization runs a ten-mile trip over a piece of the same line. They aren't related entities; Conrail absorbed Northern Central in 1976, which means this group is simply operating abandoned track as of 2013. All the local news covers the opening of the attraction, but all the NYT and major outlet coverage is about the Civil War era railroad, not the organization. Were that history to be trimmed out, only PROMO would be left. MSJapan ( talk) 18:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
MSJapan ( talk) 18:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Minor character in the Transformers universe. No evidence of real-world notability. Josh Milburn ( talk) 18:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:19, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
No independent third-party sources, fails WP:GNG. Prod removed by article creator. shoy ( reactions) 18:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unconvincing non-policy based Keep arguments. J04n( talk page) 13:53, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Promotionally written violation of ONEEVENT DGG ( talk ) 17:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
— AlexandraMichelleMarkus ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— PatrickMtz97 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep: Avi Dorfman has overcome incredible odds. His story of recovery from such a severe injury is an inspiration to many others who find themselves facing similar challenges. His exposure of the problems at UCLA was also extremely important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KarenJD01 ( talk • contribs) 02:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
— KarenJD01 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep: He's well-known in Israel for his actions during the Zikim attack, and the other things described are notable. The article is sourced and meets normal Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minjitthemidget ( talk • contribs) 08:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep: No doubt about it, he’s well known, his story is well known and of common interest. The article is well sourced and well written. It is only malicious attacks that seek to take it down. Brianoflondon ( talk) 08:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep The subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Parts of the article should be edited for style. Adamreinman ( talk) 10:58, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 13:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Biography of a prep school headmaster, making and sourcing no credible claim of greater notability than the norm among the thousands of other such people who have also existed over the years. The referencing here relies on a single news article in the local newspaper, and the school's own primary source website about itself, and the writing tone skews in a surprisingly advertorial direction for a guy who's dead. None of this suggests that he warrants an encyclopedia article for it. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 16:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
How many damn references do you want? Wikipedia is a place to research all topics thats what makes it unique and unlike other websites and encyclopedias it lets random people from all around the world share information on different topics not for them to come share information and have it taken down. DO NOT REMOVE
The result was delete. Consensus that the subject is not notable after relisting. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Kvng with the following rationale "depth of coverage is debatable, this is not an uncontroversial deletion, please use WP:AFD". I do not consider coverage here to be sufficient. 16 references but they don't seem to be sufficient. They have reliability issues - and that's discounting several which are very much self-published (PR announcements from company's own blog, etc.). Many of the reminder are niche online trade journals-like equivalents. And many focus on routine coverage ("startups that got fnding this week are..."), or are based on rewriting company's PR stuff (ex. [23]: "Finland-based mobile social gaming network Star Arcade has announced its games have been downloaded more than 5 million times.... Source: http://www.star-arcade.com/corporate/view/press/StarArcade-5milliondownloadsPressRelease-18July2011.pdf )". The company seems to have been nominated or won some awards which however are niche and don't establish notability. There are As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:06, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Dreezy. General consensus is to redirect after two relists, as the nominator suggested. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 00:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable song: Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 03:27, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Songs should only have an individual article when there is enough material to warrant a detailed article,{{ R from song}} per WP:NMUSIC so as a valid search term the article should be redirected to Dreezy. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 01:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 08:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Actor with questionable notability. From what I can tell he has only done 2 films (one uncredited according to the IMDB even-which the film does not even have a page on here, checked its English title and nope does not have one either which both have people link to) Anyway, I say delete. Wgolf ( talk) 02:03, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Discussion can continue on talk page as to where to move to J04n( talk page) 19:34, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Event won't be played by this name due to Cadillac no longer sponsoring per this [24]. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
BLP1E Article fails to show notabilty, except for the fact that he's in jail and a white supremist. Delete recommended. KoshVorlon 16:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 03:26, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
per WP:PROMOTION, fails WP:GNG. Sophia91 ( talk) 15:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. with default to keep J04n( talk page) 19:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Another new boxing organization. The only reference is to its own home page. I don't know why this article contains a list of another organization's champions--unless the organization just figured using someone else's champions is easier than creating their own. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Submitting for deletion discussion after an IP-editor contested both WP:BSD and WP:PROD. The article’s subject lacks basic notability, and most of its claims are either unsourced or dubious. The subject is an unimportant yellow paper showbiz celebrity in Finland, and the producer of three self-funded short films distributed on YouTube. The subject is totally unknown internationally.
In Finland the subject was best known for his “golden Mercedes”, one of only three in the world as he claimed, which later became confirmed to be is a standard 2005 MB500S, with golden foil and a spoiler kit. The article has already been removed once, but has reappeared, with unpublished details that could origin only from the subject himself. Caygill ( talk) 16:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
— 108.0.216.67 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
— 45.48.227.170 ( talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
User talk:Vipinhari#
The result was delete. A clear consensus for deletion. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Possible hoax. Searching for "Civilian Defense Agency" gives about 80 hits, almost all about defense agencies that are civilian. The article makes it appear as if this is a US government agency, but the website is a single page at a .us address, not a .gov address. The homepage states "Providing contract defense services for military, foreign aid workers, shipping services and more", suggesting perhaps that this is a company, not a government agency. The only hit on Google that is not generic, is this one, which refers to a Texas-based "Civilian Defense Agency, Inc." Whatever this is, a government agency or a company, the lack of sources (reliable or not) indicates a lack of notability. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:CORP, or WP:ORG. Hence: Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 15:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Further information is being supplied - A FCC lookup of another FRN associated with the CDA at https://apps.fcc.gov/coresWeb/searchDetail.do?frn=0025608365 shows the agency listed as a government agency. Sources are available to indicate this is noteworthy in the interest of government transparency and how it conducts business. Additionally, as the article states, the headquarters are in Virginia and the Training facility in South Texas so I assume they have licensed radios for use in training and public service.
To the original complainant Mr. Kitty - this is my fist contribution and you haven't even given it a chance to develop. I appreciate your diligence but your request for deletion is not only premature and without proper research but also acting a a tool to suppress information about agencies operating within the confines of the U.S. under authority of U.S. based agencies and operating in a clandestine manner.
If you look at the CIA for example, it is a "CIVILIAN" based entity yet with government authority - an oxymoron in verbiage. I have discovered the CDA is positioned similar and the structure is complex and I truly believe this is noteworthy. I have spoken with a source from the CDA when I had seen personally their personnel in the area. I spoke to one of their personnel and they gave me info I researched and verified. I am gathering information and reporting as I find it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giosue725 ( talk • contribs) 15:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I listed one of 10 FRN's I found above... A FCC lookup of another FRN associated with the CDA at https://apps.fcc.gov/coresWeb/searchDetail.do?frn=0025608365
Additionally, the article is pretty clear as to their status - I was clear in relaying that I am not sure of the government status in the article since there is conflicting information but with government FRN's I know by that they are operation within some form of governmental authority and I only reported information that was given directly to me and corroborated with in-depth research - not some simple "google" search. I worked in intelligence for 15 years so while I am sure you have the best intention, I would speculate your investigatory prowess is not within the realm of being able to uncover clandestine operations. My intent is to not only uncover this operation but several others I have found throughout my career. In my opinion I believe people have a right to know what is really going on.
Also, regarding the site, just last week it was up and multi-page with quite a bit of info. I can only assume they are updating as the site reports but I don't know since I don't work for their IT department...
I agree than in researching tax filings, I find CDA in Texas, Virginia the Carolinas and several other places. Some listed as CDA holdings and others as CDA, Inc. and some with simply Civilian Defense Agency, that their status is a bit confusing. It is obviously large and recently came out of the shadow - I find it curious as to why so the article reports what I know so far. Perhaps if given the chance others who know more can contribute.
Like I said, I admire your dedication to helping keep Wikipedia a source of reliable knowledge but I still most humbly believe you did little to no research and prematurely requested deletion which is a disservice to the Wikipedia community.
Kind regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giosue725 ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:50, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
First, a bit of background is in order:
Which takes us to the present article, a list of prefects of one Romanian county. I would say it should be deleted for two reasons: first, no individual on the list (except for one, who held a similar but distinct position before the area became a part of Romania) is notable or likely ever will be notable, and it says something about the notability of a list when all the entries are perpetual red links. Second, the topic itself lacks notability: the office is of a routine bureaucratic nature, a list of its holders beyond our scope.
I suppose, if there's a real desire for accessibility to this information, a link to the list could be added to Brașov County - I for one would not object. - Biruitorul Talk 15:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
This is an article for somebody best known for being kidnapped by aliens. The sourcing is a train-wreck of WP:BLPSOURCES-violating tabloid journalism, or otherwise just plain old "stuff on the internet", and it's saying something when the most respectable sources are The Sun and The Daily Mail. While she might be a colourful figure to listen to (if you're into that sort of thing), I can't see how this is a realistic subject for an encyclopedia. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Imelda Marcos. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
4 not very notable awards do not justify this article which was created by a SPA. Pincrete ( talk) 14:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Can't think of an appropriate AfD tag...I don't see this as a notable topic, and the almost total lack of content does not persuade me otherwise. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable radio personality lacking non-trivial support. Not sure the award provides enough to support WP:N. Borders on advert. Article created by subject's intern and edited by subject. reddogsix ( talk) 13:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
'Youngest Profesional Band' according to the Guiness Book of Pointless Trivia oops, records. This is obviously a claim of notability, but one that is liable to vanish into thin air..."They were once in the GBPT but can no longer stake the claim" seems likely given time and obviously is a very slender claim to notability. There is nothing else of substance to suggest notability. And the band are hardly new...
TheLongTone (
talk)
13:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Keep The Band passes notability guidelines for music bands. Moreover Guiness Book of Records is a World Record, None in the world like them, it makes them more notable. Akuhiltyion ( talk) 21:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete I have to say that there is no particular reason to keep the page. The notability is not there, there are no current news stories and even the page itself is lackluster and devoid of pertinent information about the band. Kaobear ( talk) 12:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The "delete" arguments are strongly based in Wikipedia policies and guidelines, while the "keep" arguments aren't. Several of the "keep" arguments amount to saying either that amphoras of this type are collectively notable as a class or that some amphoras are notable, not that this particular one is notable in its own right. Then we have "it gets 78 hits on Google": even if the number of google hits were a measure of notability (which it isn't) 78 would be a derisory number. Then we have a link to a book which gives a brief three sentence mention of the amphora, in a passage primarily about another one. It is not Bearcat who "seems to misunderstand the GNG". The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 17:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Article about a museum artifact, which simply describes its physical characteristics. No indication whatosever is given here of what would make it uniquely deserving of its own encyclopedia article, over all of the hundreds or thousands of other amphoras that are held in other museums around the world -- and the only source here is one deadlinked entry in an online directory of museum accessions. As always, Wikipedia is not a directory of every single thing that exists at all -- but nothing here suggests or sources any reason why an encyclopedia should maintain an article about it. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 13:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:03, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Declined Prod. Delete reason was "Lots of history, but not enough notability (the best is an article in a college newspaper)". Prod declined with "Notable for charting albums, will add refs", but sadly nothing was added (this was more than 2 months ago) and I can't find evidence of said chart success. Fram ( talk) 12:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 05:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. I can't access source 1 (a who's who) and 2 (a specialist directory), source 3 is about another priest where Raphael is quoted at length but isn't the subject of any attention about him, source 4 is a passing mention, and source 5 I can't access but is a section of routine reporting. Many other passing mentions can be found online, but nothing that looks to be significantly about him. Fram ( talk) 12:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. Prod declined without an actual reason or improvements. Fram ( talk) 12:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 00:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This biographical article is about a software engineer who I believe is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Although references are given for this person, it does not point to notability, in my view. Seaweed ( talk) 12:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:17, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a football player, who has to date only made the practice squad of an NFL team. WP:NGRIDIRON, however, does not confer notability until they've actually played at least one game in the main league, and the sourcing here is not strong enough to get him over WP:GNG as a substitute. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if he gets called up to the big time. Bearcat ( talk) 22:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 08:23, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertorially toned WP:BLP of a dancer, whose most substantive claim of notability is having appeared in music videos -- and who is sourced entirely to YouTube copies of said videos, with no evidence of any reliable source coverage about her in media shown at all. But a dancer gets into Wikipedia by being the subject of published coverage which satisfies WP:GNG, and does not gain an automatic entitlement to have a Wikipedia article just because user-generated video sharing or social networking sites verify that she exists. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 21:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1998 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1982 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:03, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1998 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2010 Asian Beach Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2008 Asian Beach Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2010 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. This didn't need a discussion .... anyway closing as Redirect (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Redirect per WP:BOLD to 2014 Asian Games. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 12:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2006 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:09, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2007 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1994 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1990 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1982 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1978 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:10, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1998 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1974 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:11, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:14, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. 2013 Asian Youth Games (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:16, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:17, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:18, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2005 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 1951 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:19, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. czar 13:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2009 Asian Indoor Games. 2009 Asian Indoor Games (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2002 Asian Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 2013 Asian Youth Games. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 23:22, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Empty article with no info that is not visible on the main page Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 19:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to 60 Days In. How search engines do their autocompletion isn't a criteria for whether wikipedia has an article or not. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a television personality, author and actress, which makes no strong claim of notability for any of those endeavours: it simply asserts that she exists and sources that existence only to IMDb and a sales page for her book on amazon.com, with no evidence of reliable source coverage in media shown at all. Neither being in a reality show nor writing a book are automatic notability freebies that entitle a person to an article in and of themselves -- reliable source coverage has to be present to get the topic over the bar. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 13:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable actor - does not meet either WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. A series of recent minor roles. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 00:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Since its creation seven years ago, there has been no production of independent reliable sources to verify the claims in the article or to assert that the subject is notable. — ξ xplicit 10:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Also I have a scanned copy of her interview dated 16th May 2016 in a Main news paper in Colombo Sri Lanka Where she currently is ( I am not sure how to upload this here This article can be read at http://www.pressreader.com/sri-lanka/daily-mirror-sri-lanka/20150516/281913066690512/TextView I am not sure but you may have to login to view this) . She also has appeared on national television channel on 21st May 2016.
Mcolombowala ( talk) 13:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
I have photo of the article ( Can I email that to someone for verification?) and you may have to login to view the text. It is easy as they accept facebook/google+ login. I found one link about her giving a workshop in University http://www.sjp.ac.lk/wcup/m_workshop.php Mcolombowala ( talk) 15:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Added 2 links to Newspaper and 2 Links of University. Also 2 external links of Youtube talks which are not self published which has been given here as a reference to the authenticity of the person in question. Vem Khema has appeared on local TV station Dharmavahini in 2012 but currently the TeleVision Channel has closed down. I found a link with the archived talks ( http://www.learntv.lk/video/bhavana/english/) at the end it shows the credits. In total 8 talks are available to see. The other thing is we are not having the schedule of the airing of the talks, Please suggest if this link can be used as a citation for her Wikipage. Mcolombowala ( talk) 15:42, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
The subject does not exist. The term "Rare and Undiagnosed Diseases Community" seems like an attempt to encompass the entirety of patients with rare and undiagnosed disorders, however the term occurs only on a single website (see Google search) where it is used as a rhetorical phrase rather than to designate an actual community. Article content partially overlaps with rare disease. — kashmiri TALK 10:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. One month at AfD, three relists and still no clear consensus on what to do. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 00:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG. Koala15 ( talk) 16:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Tom29739 [ talk 19:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Keep - although there isn't really a notability guideline under either WP:NMUSIC or WP:NFILM to cover music video directors specifically, this guy has shot videos for a lot of notable artists (see the number of bluelinked acts) in a particular sector that doesn't get a lot of mainstream coverage, but within the specialised hip hop field there are plenty of citations backing up the claims on his filmography (search for either "Charles Robinson" or "Charles M. Robinson" on sites like Hip Hop On Deck, Hip Hop Inquirer, Hot New Hip Hop etc.) The article as it stands needs work - more prose and less lists! - but I'd contend that since if we were talking about a rap artist rather than a rap video director he'd pass WP:NMUSIC with these same credits and this same coverage, just because we don't have specific guidelines for this kind of situation, I'd argue the GNG is satisfied here. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 13:36, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to 2016 Ohio machete attack. J04n( talk page) 00:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. I cannot access most of the sources as they are behind a proquest pay wall. Non notable, only playing as a backup singer or singing cover songs. One book doesn't make him pass WP:NAUTHOR either. Gbawden ( talk) 11:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
*Comment - I won't give an official vote yet until more votes are in, partially out of fear that
E.M.Gregory will accuse me of
WP:WIKIHOUNDING again (which I have no patience for). However, I do feel like this article gives
a bit of an undue weight on his involvement in stopping the attack, which I assume is where most of the sources on him will be coming from. Maybe this article could benefit from some more expansion on his musical career and/or that book of his?
Parsley Man (
talk)
21:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was Speedy keep. Nominator breached interaction ban. Fences& Windows 22:28, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Irrelevant song which produced no noteworthy awards or chart positions. Band itself is hardly worth mention. ALongStay ( talk) 02:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Garagepunk don't talk to me about self-righteousness, I've seem just a taste of your responses to other editors. You treat this like you're making some last stand. I made my reasons why to delete this article and other editors clearly agreed. I'm not going to respond to you anymore unless it is about the song or it is about something civil. Goodbye. ALongStay ( talk) 22:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject is not sufficiently notable for an article in the encyclopedia. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
An eye surgeon who has attended conferences, gives tips on eye care and has been involved in unfortunate litigation. None of this adds up to notability. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 08:53, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk)
No evidence of any special notability. The BBC refs shos that he is a journalist and the Leeds Trinity report is simply an update an an alumnus. Neither establish any notability. This is an ordinary jobbing TV journalist - probably good at his job but not notable in Wikipedia terms Velella Velella Talk 08:47, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Delete No obvious notability. Seaweed ( talk) 12:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Fan_fiction#Songfic. J04n( talk page) 00:19, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
This article does not meet criteria for notability (does not have significant coverage in reliable sources, one source, no notable google results). Mr. Spink talk★ contribs 15:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
trivial accomplishments: co-ed. of medium importancet anthologies, but thats not enough for WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR DGG ( talk ) 07:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
This article does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements for actors WP:NACTOR. This actor has not had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. (Simply uttering one or two lines;having a very small role in a few productions does not mean the actor is noteworthy). This actors does not have a large or significant fan base or "cult" following. This actor has not made any unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. There are no external sources, such as newspaper or magazine articles that have given this actor any coverage. -- Alaindrouin ( talk) 16:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Edit -- Alaindrouin ( talk) 17:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete Despite the article existing for a while, there are no secondary sources to back up the actor's notability. Aside from the IMDB and self-promotional Fountainhead link, no information to speak of. Fails WP:NACTOR. If any entertainer who has appeared in films with actual notable people deserves their own article then we just might as well have an article for every non-extra performer regardless of his/her prominence. KelseyWill ( talk) 23:57, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Women's pro wrestler with no significant independent coverage. Only links are to results or her own pages. Mdtemp ( talk) 18:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete There are some secondary links to bodybuilding competitions but definitely lacks notability as per WP:ENT. Maybe some regional or local notability but nowhere near enough to meet Wikipedia's standards. KelseyWill ( talk) 00:15, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Found this through Special:Random. Funnily enough, I deleted it before, only to undelete it because he'd gotten a minor award that (in my opinion at the time) was enough to disqualify him for A7. So a woman in a burning building throws her baby to a guy on the street below, and the guy gets on all the news programs for a few days. Article-worthy? Not at all. For someone like this, Google hits are relevant; I've gotten through fifty Google hits without finding even one that mentions this guy. Nyttend ( talk) 02:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 10:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Poorly sourced article about a one-off smalltown film festival with no demonstrated claim of notability per WP:EVENT -- and while this article claims that "a second edition is set for July 2014", that's now almost two years into the past but I can find no reliably sourced indication that it ever actually happened. As always, an event like this is not automatically entitled to permanent coverage in an encyclopedia just because it existed -- it must be the subject of sufficient RS coverage to get it over a notability criterion. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 06:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Opportunity for rework per suggestions in discussion (non-admin closure) — crh 23 ( Talk) 16:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
This page was created by a now blocked sock. I could find no coverage outside of routine "elections are taking place" or "person X is now in office". Where there is coverage, it's about the people holding the office or an election, not the political office itself. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. ~ Rob Talk 06:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. On a procedural note, this discussion was difficult to understand, mostly because of
this edit. The best way to correct an error like that is to strike out the incorrect wording and add the correct version, so you end up with something like satisfies doesn't satisfy. As it is, we have comments in the discussion referring to text which no longer exists, which is kind of confusing to the reader (i.e. me).
The one person arguing to keep was (in part) basing their opinion on the erroneous text. It's unclear if they saw the correction and chose not to respond to it, or not. In any case, even if I assume the rest of their comment still holds, that's not enough to overcome the weight of all the other delete opinions. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
The subject doesn't satisfy the criteria under WP:PROF. Article lacks any in-depth support of individual establishing notability. Was previously subject of an AfD which was closed with a decision of no-consensus. Since that time there has been no improvement of the article or any inclusion of additional references supporting the subject's notability. Dan arndt ( talk) 05:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Miss Peru. Nakon 21:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Not a real pageant. The Banner talk 15:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 07:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Notability & source Fitindia ( talk) 10:22, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete, per WP:SOFTDELETE-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Other than that this TV channel exists and a number of people enjoy watching it, there appears to be nothing notable about it. Other than the novelty of being related to game shows, this seems like a run-of-the-mill type institution among many competing TV networks. Looking for news about it in terms of reliable sourcing appears to just generate slight, passing mentions only. This story here is typical, with all it says being: "You must use the SIM to dial a special number with the serial number of the smart-card and True Visions will allow you to watch three more channels - True Thai Film, True X-Zyte and True Movie Hits - free of charge for 12 months." Perhaps a great deal, yet not encyclopedia worthy. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 09:57, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was merged to Berry College. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 01:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Elementary school with no evidence of any special notability. Yoshiman6464 ( talk) 03:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator I merged the information to the Berry College page. Yoshiman6464 ( talk) 18:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to IBM DB2#Technical information,. Selective merge, per Mark viking's guidance. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Dialectric with the following rationale "google books search shows numerous mentions. redirect may be in order, but that can be discussed without a prod". I am not averse to a redirect (through to where, I am not sure) but as a stand-alone article this does not seem to pass. The references do not pass muster: yes, there are mentions in books, but they are mostly in passing. The software does have a section devoted to it in several books, through rather then any analysis of significance those sections seem to be how-to-use manauls, technical and going on for a page or so. There is no single work on this topic, and few short mentions in niche textbooks don't seem to qualify for NSOFTWARE "It is the subject of multiple printed third-party manuals, instruction books, or reliable reviews". Nothing I can find supports this passing that or WP:N. Seems like software-spam, particularly considering the language (this has been tagged as an advert for 5+ years now...). I think IBM has enough adevertising budget it doesn't need us to help them - we are not the directory of software ( WP:NOTDIRECTORY). PS. Creator, of course, was a WP:SPA... Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 06:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Patent nonsense. This hoax article needs to be deleted ASAP. There's absolutely no such thing as "Macedonian Pakistan". There was no such era. Pakistan was created in 1947 (incl. the name), so there was no "Pakistan" before that. On top of that, the article contains nothing more than a few links of battles Alexander fought in the area on the soil which happesn to be located on soil of what today is "Pakistan", aka the post-1947 nation. There is no reason that I can possibly think of that could merit the keeping of this nonsensical "article". Pseudo-historical nonsense at its best. The "new" user who created this article created this similarily hoax article as well (which is being AfD'd too). - LouisAragon ( talk) 02:03, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. — Spaceman Spiff 06:45, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Patent nonsense. This hoax article needs to be deleted ASAP. There's absolutely no such thing as "Achaemenid Pakistan". Imagine titles such as "Phoenician France", "Byzantine FYROM" or "Achaemenid Romania", and what-not totally nonsensical anachronistic names. There was no such era. Pakistan was created in 1947, so there was no "Pakistan" before that. On top of that, the article contains nothing more than a few links of Achaemenid satrapies (provinces) which happen to be located on soil of what today is "Pakistan", the post-1947 nation. There is no reason that I can possibly think of that could merit the keeping of this nonsensical "article". Pseudo-historical nonsense at its best. The "new" user who created this, created this equally nonsensical article as well (which is being AfD'd as well). - LouisAragon ( talk) 01:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Local politician with some coverage in local media. Magnolia677 ( talk) 01:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Renaming / redirect to be discussed on article TalkPage. ( non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 03:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:NOTNEWS. This gorilla was not notable in life, but is getting lots of coverage due to the specific news story of its death. – Muboshgu ( talk) 01:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Unless news coverage of an individual goes beyond the context of a single event, our coverage of that idividual should be limited to the article about that event, in proportion to their importance to the overall topic.
As such, brief bursts of news coverage may not be sufficient signs of notability, while sustained coverage would be
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:44, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Checking sources for BLP problems, I found that little checks out in this biography of an alleged Oakland Raiders player. No claim of playing a game to establish WP:NGRIDIRON notability. No reliable source evidence this player ever signed with the Raiders. (Supplied reference failed verification.) Only coverage appears to be a blog listing of top small school prospects and routine track and field results. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Advertising, marketing or public relations •
Arts
Rescuer
09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC) —
ArtsRescuer (
talk •
contribs) is a confirmed
sock puppet of
Shafinusri (
talk •
contribs).