WIKIPEDIA:ARBITRATION COMMITTEE ELECTIONS DECEMBER 2007 VOTE NEWYORKBRAD

2007 Election status

Nominations are closed.
Voting has closed. (ended 16 December 2007, 23:59 UTC)
Jimbo Wales has appointed the new Arbitration Committee members.

Newyorkbrad

Thank you for considering my candidacy for the Arbitration Committee.

I registered my account in February 2006, began editing actively in July 2006, and became an administrator in January 2007. I have participated extensively in arbitrations for more than one year and have drafted many workshop proposals, several of which have been included in the final decisions.

Someone sought to "draft" me to run for the Arbitration Committee in last year's election, but I believed I was too new a user at that time. Instead, early in 2007 I was named as a Clerk for the committee. Clerk responsibilities including opening and closing cases, monitoring the case pages, providing procedural advice to parties, and preparing implementation notes for decisions. This work has familiarized me with all aspects of the arbitration process and with its strengths and weaknesses.

My off-wiki resume includes 20 years of experience as a litigation attorney in Manhattan. Despite this, I would not bring a legalistic approach to the Wikipedia arbitration process. What I would do is seek in every case to analyze the evidence carefully and to reach a result that is fair to all users involved in the case and will best serve the project as a whole.

It is essential that the Arbitration Committee speed up its process of considering and deciding cases. This year as in the past, there have been delays in deciding many cases. Too often, these delays have caused bitter disputes between editors, which were brought to arbitration to obtain a just and speedy resolution, instead to fester and worsen. Such outcomes defeat the whole purpose of having a high-level body of experienced and respected editors to resolve disputes as fairly and expeditiously as possible.

I respect the difficult role that the arbitrators and the Arbitration Committee play. Dealing with some of Wikipedia's most intractible disputes and most truculent users—to say nothing of the sensitive matters that the arbitrators must sometimes address off-wiki—is inherently a time-consuming, challenging, and sometimes tiring role. If the community chooses me among the editors to play this role, I will do so diligently and to the best of my ability. I look forward to answering questions from members of the community.

Newyorkbrad ( talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Questions for the candidate
Support or Oppose this candidate

Support

Daniel 00:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Mackensen (talk) 00:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support: Extended comments moved to talk page. Nick 00:00, 3 December 2007
Support— trey( wiki) 00:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strongest Support I've Ever Given -Duh. --( Review Me) R ^Parlate Contribs_@ 00:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Easiest choice all day Kwsn (Ni!) 00:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Paul August ☎ 00:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Nishkid64 ( talk) 00:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely! Wizardman 00:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Kurykh 00:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Sam Blacketer 00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Mr. Z-man 00:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Rschen7754 ( T C) 00:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Qst 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Pre ston H 00:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Patient, thoughtful, knowledgeable. Plus he will write. fuller vote explanations -- Jd2718 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
ragesoss 00:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Comes reccomended by AnonEMouse. : Albion moonlight ( talk) 19:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Albion moonlight does not have suffrage -- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs(st47) 23:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
BLACKKITE 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Woody 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Coren ^(talk) 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
100% This is a Secret ^account 00:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
AniMate 00:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
ec*5 It's about time — Animum § 00:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support-- U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 00:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yes. Kei lana 00:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Charles P._ (Mirv) 00:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Anthøny 00:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Cbrown1023 talk 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
(ec*2) Jonathan ^{(
T•
@•
C)} 00:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
– Gurch ( talk) 00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Heimstern Läufer (talk) 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Prolog 00:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Chaz ^Beckett 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Baka man 00:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Ya, this will be a squeaker. ++ Lar: t/ c 00:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Will (aka Wimt) 00:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
spryde | talk 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Easiest vote I'll make this year... -- W.marsh 00:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— TKD:: Talk 00:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs(st47) 00:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Gracenotes^T § 00:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Based on his/her bravery in the recent Durova case. Travb ( talk) 00:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
east.718 at 00:29, December 3, 2007
Good luck to you. This was easy. Monsieurdl 00:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Nufy8 00:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Maturity, experience, judgement. Excellent candidate. Antandrus (talk) 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Pile-on Support. Bishonen | talk 00:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC). reply
Definitely. 哦， 是吗？( review O) 00:32, 03 December 2007 (GMT)
Good experience and our only interaction has been nice. Icestorm815 00:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support BobTheTomato 00:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Like me, except without the violent moodswings. MessedRocker ( talk) ( write these articles) 00:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
"You mean you weren't already" is often seen on RFA. I think it fits here - not in that I actually did not know you were not on the committee, but rather that it is surprising that you were not. — Random832 00:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
ABSOLUTELY! — Rlevse • Talk • 00:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Extremely excellent editing gets an Extreme Support Mbisanz 00:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Duk 00:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Definitely. • Lawrence Cohen 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
ALKIVAR ™ ☢ 00:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- auburnpilot talk 00:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- MBK₀₀₄ 00:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Rjd0060 00:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Step hen 00:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Sympathy vote -- Doc^g 00:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support – priyanath talk 00:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
~Sasha Callahan _(Talk) 00:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Perfect. Prodego ^talk 00:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Christopher Parham (talk) 00:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- Jehochman ^Talk 00:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Sluzzelin talk 00:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
~ Riana ⁂ 00:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Agüeybaná 00:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Elipongo ( Talk contribs) 00:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
An outstanding candidate -- Manning 00:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. R. Baley 01:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
An outstanding candidate ,impartial and firm on principles. Pharaoh of the Wizards 01:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Captain panda 01:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This is the second obvious vote for me so far. Carcharoth 01:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
JavaTenor 01:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Excellent candidate. -- Avi 01:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Sean William @ 01:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
We are so lucky to have this guy. Kla’quot ( talk | contribs) 01:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Continually has proven himself to be a (sometimes THE) voice of reason and sanity at ArbCom. sh ¤ y 01:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Very dedicated and qualified - Fedayee 01:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
(and i'm not a copycat, I created the image :P ) -- drini ^[meta:]_[commons:] 01:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm the copycat. I saw you use it on another user's voting page :D. --( Review Me) R ^Parlate Contribs_@ 01:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Casey Abell 01:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
About the only one I can support without doubt or self questioning. GRBerry 01:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
maclean 01:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fred Bauder 01:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Seems to have the right mindset, experience, and lack of blood on his hands, a rarity in these ArbCom elections. :-/ Grand master ka 01:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
CIreland 01:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
krimpet ⟲ 01:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Brad, I'm so terribly sorry. I support you in this, and may God have mercy on your soul. DS 01:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - calm in about every situation I've witnessed. He also has some arbitration experience from clerking, so I think he is an excellent candidate for ArbCom. And the fact I got edit conflicted on adding a support should speak for itself. Nwwaew ( Talk Page) ( Contribs) ( E-mail me) 01:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely SQL ^{Query me!} 01:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Yes. Sane and fair. Miranda 01:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Carnildo 01:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yes. -- Alecmconroy 01:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolute support. - gadfium 01:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Tyrenius 01:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Core desat 01:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Risker 02:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
➪ HiDrNick! 02:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— master son^{T -
C} 02:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- Royalguard11( T· R!) 02:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
the best possible person. DGG ( talk) 02:06, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Just be light on the "lawyering" :D -- Tawker 02:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, Newyorkbrad ( talk · contribs) does good work here on the project. Cirt 02:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC). reply
Support- Dureo 02:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely. Kuru ^talk 02:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yes. Smokizzy ( talk) 02:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Alex fus co5 02:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
bibliomaniac 1 5 02:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support FlowerpotmaN·( t) 02:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 02:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Mike H. Celebrating three years of being hotter than Paris 02:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
WODUP 02:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
B 02:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Too new, but gloriously overqualified. Zocky | picture popups 02:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Well, duh. Thatcher131 02:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
If he's not promoted, that would be a crime! Scob e ll302 02:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Duh. Rebecca 02:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Has he ever been involved in a conflict where he wasn't the voice of reason? ATren 02:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Much as I hate to jump on bandwagons. — Cryptic 02:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
How many times can I vote? — bbatsell ¿? ✍ 02:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I strongly support this nomination: Newyorkbrad is clearly one of our best users, and he will make a brilliant arbitrator. Acalamari 02:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Dihydrogen Monoxide ^♫ 02:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
John254 03:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
· AndonicO ^Talk 03:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Wknight94 ( talk) 03:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
futurebird 03:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely. Glass Cobra 03:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Happy support. -- InkSplotch 03:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply

InkSplotch does not have suffrage -- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs(st47) 21:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- MPerel 03:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Should have run last year. Picaroon (t) 03:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Of special note: Asset. Mercury 03:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely. -- Cactus.man ✍ 03:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Too crowded here. No wonder. Hús ö nd 03:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Bob Mellish 03:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Definitely support. Hal peridol 03:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Without reservation. Rockpocke t 03:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Aboutmovies 03:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
piling on Johnbod
Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— madman bum and angel 03:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Aksi_great ( talk) 03:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
If I could choose only one candidate from the entire list, I would choose Newyorkbrad. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 03:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
JayHenry 03:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Ealdgyth | Talk 03:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support -- Cobi^{(
t|
c|
b|
cn)} 04:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Viridae ^Talk 04:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Most definitely. A very dedicated, wise, and hardworking contributor. The best fit for the position. Oleg Alexandrov ( talk) 04:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support. Would have supported him last year and has continued to demonstrate the qualities of an excellent arbitor. Eluchil404 04:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Everyking 04:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Fair, levelheaded, calm and prone to being reasonable when provoked - Peripitus (Talk) 04:32, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
GHe ( Talk) 04:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— xaosflux ^Talk 04:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- El on ka 04:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
hbdragon88 04:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The Evil Spartan 05:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
¿Amar៛^{Talk to me/
My edits} 05:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
utcursch | talk 05:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I dorftrottel I talk I 05:31, December 3, 2007
— Mira 05:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Athaenara ✉ 05:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Of course... highly trustworthy, highly qualified, superb job as Arbcom clerk, and understands what he's getting into, regarding workload and all. -- Aude ( talk) 05:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
RyanGerbil10 (Говорить!) 05:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This is the easy one.-- Kubigula ( talk) 05:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yes please. Spebi 05:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Well-rounded, tough, patient, with a unique mix of integrity, intelligence and level-headed compassion in the back pocket. Ideal. Pia ( talk) 06:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Isarig 06:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
TMF ^{Let's Go Mets -
Stats} 06:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Hmm, this is beginning to look like his RfA. In all seriousness, there are few better suited to the task. James086^{Talk |
Email} 06:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
6SJ7 06:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Of course. Dragons flight 06:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yea - Jeeny ^(talk) 06:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- ROGER DAVIES ^talk 06:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Of course — Jack Merridew 06:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Ned Scott 06:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Wutgout reservation, and extremely willingly (I am currently on camp, using afreind's PC, and into the camp's internet - can't get more willing than that! ;)) -- Anonymous Dissident ^Talk 07:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
WAS 4.250 07:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Foregone conclusion, but will be an excellent Arbitrator. MastCell ^Talk 07:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
hard-working, decent guy. does his homework when investigating, certainly competent-- Certified.Gangsta 07:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 07:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. I'd like to oppose just to be the first contrarian, but that's impossible as NYBrad is one of the most fair, level-headed users I've come across. Full support.-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 07:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support V-train 07:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Hut 8.5 07:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- Crockspot 07:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Of course. Davewild 07:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
SchmuckyTheCat
No explanations needed. MaxSem^{(
Han shot first!)} 07:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Boring. But boring is good. ^Thanks, _{Luc "Somethingorother" French} 08:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Lara ❤ Love 08:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
What? No opposes!? :-( — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 08:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I've found that "what Brad says" and "what's right for Wikipedia" often coincide. r<;;span style="color: #555;">speer / ɹəədsɹ 08:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
DrKiernan 08:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
200?? ~ Eliz 81^(C) 08:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Normally, I would be amazed to see no opposes. Here, I would be amazed if anyone did find a reason to oppose. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 08:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Jmlk 1 7 08:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Obvious, really. -- Folantin 09:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
skip ( t / c) 09:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
John Vandenberg 09:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Itub 09:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Excellent judgment. Shem^(talk) 09:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Everyone likes NYB, he's quite the gent. I was a little concerned he was always going to be a career wikilawyer, which he probably is, but damn good it, so you have my respect and support Brad. -- Mcginnly | Natter 10:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 10:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
<<-armon->> 10:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
If he isn't qualified enough, then I don't really know who is..He is the best candidate of the lot..-- Comet styles 10:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Brad will pass and will be selected. Brad must never compromise to be a chum to existing folks nor old friends nor fashion nor "need": this is the sole concern. Geogre 10:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Will be a good addition to the Arbitration Committee. Angela . 10:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Eusebeus 11:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Vassyana 11:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- lucasbfr ^talk 11:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Stifle ( talk) 11:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Awadewit | talk 12:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- CBD 12:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- Two Oars (Rev) 12:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Definitely — ras52 12:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Kittybrewster ☎ 13:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, Modernist 13:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Keep up the good work. -- Marcsin |^Talk 13:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, easily. · jersyko talk 13:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support -- best of this field. Extremely talented and fit for duty. Xoloz 13:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Easy decision. PeaceNT 14:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Addhoc 14:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Grue 14:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
JoshuaZ 14:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
ElinorD (talk) 14:48, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- barneca 14:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Iain99^{Balderdash and
piffle} 14:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Though not eligible to vote, I support this candidate. From the looks of it, currently, he is a sure bet. I look forward to him adding a level of decorum to the Committee. HydroMagi 14:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Jeffpw 15:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unequivocal and enthusiastic support. — Satori Son 15:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Dekimasu よ! 15:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
KTC 15:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Extended comments moved to talk page. Orderinchaos 15:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Perhaps the best possible candidate (I mean that in a nice way :-) ) GDonato ( talk) 15:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Chris 16:02, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 16:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Of course. the wub "?!" 16:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
EconomicsGuy 16:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Mattisse 16:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
daveh4h 16:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Obvious pound-tilde-tilde-tilde-tilde ~ trialsanderrors 16:47, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Well of course! Neryorkarb! — Rudget _{contributions} 16:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Ral 315 — ( Voting) 17:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Ucucha 17:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, I support this candidate.-- Isotope23 ^talk 17:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
SupportWill be a great addition to the committee ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:09, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Am I too late to support? TenOfAllTrades( talk) 17:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Few other candidates can claim this level of experience. — Gavia immer (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support.... Martinp 17:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Very thoughtful contributor. alanyst ^/
talk/ 17:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Not bad for a lawyer... - JodyB_talk 17:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Will do well. Neparis 17:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Plus one to almost unanimous support. Avruch ^Talk 17:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Avruch does not have suffrage -- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs(st47) 22:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Bryan Derksen 17:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Edivorce 17:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- MONGO 18:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. One of the users I most respect. - Philippe | Talk 18:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
VartanM 18:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- love seeing his name around b/c it means something good happened. PaddyM 18:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
With a few reservations, but OK. Good focus on speeding things up. Moreschi ^{If you've written a quality article...} 18:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Reinoutr 19:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
support -- Rocksanddirt 19:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
There is no even a slightest need to elaborate on the vote for this truly exceptional candidate. Would make a jewel addition to the ArbCom. -- Irpen 19:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely support MookieZ 19:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
– Quadell ^{(
talk) (
random)} 19:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Kbdank71 20:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A no-brainer. Brad definitely should be on the ArbCom. _{Folic_Acid |
talk} 20:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Obviously! Gonna be a +300-- Phoenix-wiki ^{(
talk ·
contribs)} 20:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oldelpaso 20:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support very impressive candidate.-- Bedivere 20:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Darkson (Yabba Dabba Doo!) 20:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Malcolmxl5 21:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Celestianpower ^háblame 21:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
(strong?) Support. Well-read on wikipedia Rules & Regulations. Mindraker 21:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - sure, why not. -- Schneelocke 21:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Ruud 22:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Seems the best of the lot. -- Pleasantville 22:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unequivocated support - what, under 99% in favor? That makes me deeply, deeply troubled by the state of the Wiki. :-). -- AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 22:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Sandstein 22:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support for a good candidate. --David Shankbone 22:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. — CComMack ( t– c) 23:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Zantastik talk 23:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Merkinsmum 23:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Toffile 23:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support — Sebastian 23:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Absolutely, WjB scribe 23:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Moral support _→
Aza
Toth 23:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Zginder ( talk) ( Contrib) 23:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Corvus cornix_talk 23:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Hardyplants 00:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support - HoosierState 16:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strongest possible support. Cool Hand Luke 00:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
EconomistBR 00:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Mtmelendez ^(
Talk) 00:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
about dam time. β^_command 00:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Thanks, SqueakBox 01:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, gah, missed slot 222. Anyway, good luck. ;) *Cremepuff 222* 01:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Newyorkbrad is not only qualified, but an approachable candidate, in my opinion. Nihiltres^{
t.
l} 01:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yup Fainites ^barley 01:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Absolutely the type of individual we need on Arbcom. Horologium (talk) 01:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Bastun^{BaStun not BaTsun} 01:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support - Yes Sir! JungleCat Shiny!/ Oohhh! 01:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Imperator3733 01:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
~~-- arkalochori ^|talk| 01:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)~~ reply
Blocked indef Secret ^account 00:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support × Meegs 01:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Aye. Smart, level-headed, rational. What else could you ask for? ♠ P M C♠ 01:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support-- Jerry 01:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The above signature looks like my user name, but it is a different unrelated user ( User:Jerrch). JERRY ^talk _contribs 03:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support-- Brewcrewer 02:00, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Adam Cuerden ^talk 02:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Greg Jones II 02:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong support: the work as clerk is valuable. Jonathunder 02:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - of course! - Alison ^❤ 02:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - glad I got here first ( Sarah777 03:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)) reply
Support -- A. B. ^(talk) 03:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - A huge asset to the project. --健次( derumi)^talk 03:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
@pple complain 03:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A slam dunk. COGDEN 04:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Can't argue with over 300 supports. MrMurph101 04:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
J-ſtan^Talk_Contribs 04:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Mangoe 04:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong support One of the very best people in the project. Raymond Arritt 04:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong support Capable, experienced with the details. Pigman ☿ 04:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Possibly the most capable person to be an arbitrator. -- D_arkF_alls ^talk 04:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - FCYTravis 05:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- DHeyward 05:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Keegan^talk 06:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
kmccoy (talk) 06:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support all the way. Blair - Speak to me 06:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support— Cronholm¹⁴⁴ 06:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm glad I can toss in the deciding vote in what is sure to be a down-to-the-wire situation. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 06:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Soleil (talk) 07:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong suport, IMHO the best candidate in these elections Alex Bakharev 07:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Grandmaster 08:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 10:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Euryalus 10:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Level-headed, intelligent and tactful. Despite lots of experience as an admin and ArbCom clerk, he hasn't been captured by the bureaucracy. He tends to have a sound and sensible perspective on most issues, often reconciling opposed views, and I think his skills are ideal for an arbitrator. Walton^One 14:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Versa geek 15:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- BlueMoonlet ( t/ c) 15:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Fram 15:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Choess 15:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, has been an excellent clerk for ArbCom, patient, thoughtful, and very helpful. Dreadstar † 15:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Srikeit 15:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support nancy ^(talk) 16:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Bfigura ^(
talk) 16:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
NYB to Chief Justice -- Y not? 16:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Sounds sufficiently sensible, shall support. >Radiant< 17:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
- Zeibura ^(
Talk) 17:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
support Pete.Hurd 17:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Skinny McGee 18:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose - leaving us in the lurch without a de facto head clerk. _{Sensible reason: constant voice of reason, sensitive, well thought-out opinions, etc.} David Mestel^(
Talk) 18:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Galloglass 18:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, that's an easy one.-- Aldux 18:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Ioeth _{(
talk
contribs
friendly)} 18:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Yes. -- Levine2112 ^discuss 19:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support! Go NYB!! *Mind storms Kid* 19:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
User had fewer than 150 mainspace edits as of 1 November 2007, and thus lacks suffrage. ZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 20:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Jon Harald Søby 19:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support-- SECisek 20:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I thought I already supported. This should be considered my first, and most obvious, vote. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Deor 20:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- fair and sensible, just what WP needs. -- profg ^Talk 21:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- breath of fresh air, and dedicated. SirFozzie ( talk) 21:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Probably the best candidate we have here. Guy ( Help!) 22:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support... going a bit recalcitrant here. -- Van helsing ( talk) 22:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Good attitude, relevant real-life experience. Great candidate. - Mgm| ^(talk) 22:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Merzbow ( talk) 23:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- simply the best. ScienceApologist ( talk) 23:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Michael Snow ( talk) 23:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. -- RG ² 23:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Epbr123 ( talk) 23:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Good Arbitrator. —— Martin^phi ☎ Ψ Φ—— 23:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Clear choice here. — METS501 ( talk) 23:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Thank you for an easy pick. Shenme ( talk) 00:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Of course. -- Conti| ✉ 01:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - And apparently he's so popular too : ) - jc37 02:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support ~ UBeR ( talk) 02:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, Stepp-Wulf ( talk) 04:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC). reply
Ariel ♥ Gold 04:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support-- Rayc ( talk) 05:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Most unequivocal thing I have ever done on Wikipedia. Ante lan ^talk 05:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Noroton ( talk) 06:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Quiddity ( talk) 06:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Viriditas 07:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
W/mint ^-Talk- 07:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Albion moonlight ( talk) 09:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC) A vote for the status quo more or less... reply
Vote self-indented by voter (lacking suffrage). ZZ ^Claims~ Evidence
Support Wetman ( talk) 09:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Ooooh, a bandwagon! Kyaa the Catlord ( talk) 11:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Alex Middleton ( talk) 11:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Without reservations. -- Richard ( talk) 12:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Padraig ( talk) 13:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm Mailer Diablo ( talk) and I approve this candidate! - 14:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Has shown much more wisdom then most current arbitrators. -- Sander Säde 14:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Nightshadow28 ( talk) 14:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Great user, good luck! -- ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{walkie-talkie |
tool box} 15:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Never a foot wrong. Thincat ( talk) 15:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Might as well get in with WP:400! Ryan Postlethwaite 15:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support semper fictilis 15:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Johnleemk | Talk 16:18, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Ceoil ( talk) 16:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support --Duke of Duchess Street ( talk) 17:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support SashaNein ( talk) 17:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Sweetfirsttouch ( talk) 17:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- since all the cool and uncool kids are doing it... Seriously, impressively qualified and fair-minded. -- ArglebargleIV ( talk) 17:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Skinwalker ( talk) 18:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support John Carter ( talk) 18:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support This is not a bandwagon anymore... but sure :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus|
talk} 19:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Alæxis_¿question? 19:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Willing to listen and learn. Always a plus for an Arbitrator. Supporting, Asterion^talk 19:40, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Excellent judgement and temperment. I'm only sad I didn't get higher up in the support list... Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 20:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support — DerHexer (Talk) 20:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Shudde ^talk 21:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Andrwsc ( talk) 22:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support nat.u toronto 22:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Ferrylodge ( talk) 22:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
See #120 by Thatcher131. – Black Falcon ^(
Talk) 01:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Sbowers3 ( talk) 01:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support obviously Yonatan ^talk 02:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support — BillC ^talk 02:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support He helped me out when I had no clue what was going on. Yaksar ( talk) 03:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
User had fewer than 150 mainspace edits as of 1 November 2007, and thus lacks suffrage ZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 03:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 05:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support voice of reason — Lost ^(talk) 07:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Kusma ( talk) 08:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support ...and good luck! Huldra ( talk) 08:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support I never thought I'd see this universal of support for one candidate for anything. Bravo! -- Woohookitty^Woohoo! 12:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support of course.-- danntm ^T _C 15:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support docboat ( talk) 16:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Terence ( talk) 16:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Ferkelparade π 17:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - KNM ^Talk 17:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support qp10qp ( talk) 17:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Probably the best qualified of all the candidates. Agne ^Cheese/ ^Wine 19:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Branson03 ( talk) 21:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Law Lord ( talk) 22:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong support ▪◦▪ ≡ЅiREX≡ ^Talk 22:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Still considering the other candidates, but this decision was easy.-- Bradeos Graphon ( talk) 22:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Solid wikicitizen who makes sensible decisions. BusterD ( talk) 23:06, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support; not afraid to own up to mistakes, which are few and far between from this excellent candidate. -- John ( talk) 00:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
ˉˉ^anetode ╦╩ 01:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, albeit a few days late. - Penwhale | ^{Blast him /
Follow his steps} 01:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
WP:SNOW anyone? -- Kendrick7^talk 03:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - level headed in all cases I have interact with this user. David D. (Talk) 07:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Brusegadi ( talk) 07:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Wimstead ( talk) 07:56, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support per R, Thatcher131, and Rebecca. Duh. Titoxd^{(
?!? -
cool stuff)} 08:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. phoebe/( talk) 08:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support 'nough said.-- cj | talk 08:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support.-- Russianname ( talk) 09:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Aatomic1 ( talk) 12:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- RelHistBuff ( talk) 15:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 16:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support I hope you will do much good! M.K. ( talk) 16:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Seraphim ^Whipp 16:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- The.Q^(t)
(c) 16:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Hαvεlok беседа мансарда 19:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support youngamerican ( wtf?) 20:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Mrabbits ( talk) 21:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Wolfman ( talk) 21:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Although you've supported my blocks and stuff, I have a good impression of you. -- Matt57 ^{(
talk•
contribs)} 22:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Jim62sch 23:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Gwern (contribs) 05:41 8 December 2007 (GMT)
Support Graham 87 06:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Hopefully with this vote, he'll manage to squeeeek on in... -- Hyperbole ( talk) 09:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- BorgQueen ( talk) 11:48, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Farosdaughter ( talk) 13:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Hiding T 17:47, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Tony Fox (arf!) 19:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Whig ( talk) 20:01, 8 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Not a difficult decision. EdJohnston ( talk) 01:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Absolutely! -- Fyslee / talk 01:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Andre ( talk) 02:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Have 470 Wikipedians ever support something? Well, if we add a phenomenal user to an ArbCom position, the answer is yes. No, seriously, I can't think of a better example of an outstanding editor or a perfect ArbCom candidate. Good luck! NF24^{(
radio me!)} 03:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Majoreditor ( talk) 06:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Naveen ^(
talk) 07:32, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - I have seen the contributions of Newyorkbrad and all I can say is he is just brilliant. Masterpiece2000 ( talk) 12:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
— Encephalon 12:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong support. Thoughtful, calm and diligent, and clearly committed to the much-needed speeding-up of arbcom. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 12:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Tonywalton ^Talk 12:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong support. Calm and level headed. -- PTR ( talk) 14:29, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Mill cleaner ( talk) 14:31, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support. Seems almost perfect for the job. -- Blue Tie ( talk) 15:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Can't go wrong with someone you've met face to face. Great guy online and off. Will no doubt be an excellent Arbitrator. Daniel Case ( talk) 20:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Biruitorul ( talk) 20:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Jab843 ( talk) 21:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support :-) Stwalkerster talk 21:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Mark (Mschel) 21:27, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Abd ( talk) 22:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Abd does not have suffrage -- uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟ ʇs(st47) 23:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Chrislintott ( talk) 23:24, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Uncle Ed ( talk) 01:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Support For once, the mob is in accordance. -- \/\/slack ( talk) 04:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Ashdog137 ( talk) 05:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support ugen64 ( talk) 06:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support My full endorsement :-) -- Aphaia ( talk) 07:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Auroranorth ( !) 12:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Legis ( talk - contribs) 13:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Will make an excellent member of the committee for many reasons. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 18:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - great experience, great track record. Warofdreams talk 19:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong support as a great admin and a lawyer without being legalistic. Bearian ( talk) 19:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Albion moonlight ( talk) 19:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Albion moonlight is ineligible to vote in these elections. They have also voted twice for this candidate. Woody ( talk) 23:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Support -- Roosa ( talk) 20:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Vote indented due to lack of 150 mainspace edits. Woody ( talk) 20:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Torinir ( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options ) 21:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support The Bethling ^(Talk) 09:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support My interactions with Newyorkbrad, observations of him and feedback from others (including the support votes he has received) convince me that he has all the traits of a great arbitrator: incorruptibility, experience with dispute resolution and an ability to stay cool when the editing gets hot. -- J.L.W.S. The Special One ( talk) 09:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Cri du canard ( talk) 12:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Vote indented due to lack of 150 mainspace edits.-- Comet styles 12:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
SupportAn asset to the project who will be excellent in this new role -- Slp1 ( talk) 12:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Allen3 ^talk 16:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC
Support Tellervo ( talk) 17:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Mike R ( talk) 20:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support TallMagic ( talk) 21:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Sue Wallace ( talk) 03:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Turgidson ( talk) 04:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I had to hit {PgDn} 46 times to get down here! The page should come w/ an RSI risk advisory ... Saravask ( talk) 05:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Would make an excellent arbitrator. Metamagician3000 ( talk) 09:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Jitse Niesen ( talk) 19:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply
feydey ( talk) 21:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support-- Alf ^melmac 21:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Saudade7 22:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support --Akhilleus ( talk) 06:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support wbfergus^Talk 21:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Waffle House (scattered, chunked, diced, peppered, capped, topped, smothered, covered) Support. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 06:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
WP:517 (I'm sure now you'll just squeak by...) - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦ ♫ 08:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Mathsci ( talk) 10:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support - Tim Vickers ( talk) 00:15, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Maxim_(talk) 00:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support obviously. JERRY ^talk _contribs 01:06, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support best candidate I have seen so far. Rgds, -- Trident13 ( talk) 01:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support dv dv dv d 03:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, although being a calm voice of reason must get old after a while. IronGargoyle ( talk) 04:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Yahel Guhan 05:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, no good deed shall go unpunished; least of all perseverence at boring tasks. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. ( talk) 10:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong support - E104421 ( talk) 11:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Longhair\^talk 12:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support but not wanting to run up the score ;) NoSeptember 20:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Support Genisock2 ( talk) 20:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Haukur ( talk) 21:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support -- Hirohisat ^紅葉 21:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. -- Muchness ( talk) 23:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Esrever ^(
klaT) 07:24, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Karl2620 ( talk) 11:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Миша 13 11:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support with confidence. Abecedare ( talk) 13:39, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. Novickas ( talk) 15:28, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support, in case 500+ editors show up and oppose in the next few hours. szyslak 16:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support — Very resourceful and positive in his role as clerk. Can be counted on, and will make a great arbitrator.-- Endroit ( talk) 18:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
-- Vintagekits ( talk) 18:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support — Zerida 18:56, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support. -- JWSchmidt ( talk) 20:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support-- Cailil ^talk 21:01, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Voice-of-All 21:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Batmanand | Talk 22:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Traditional unionist ( talk) 22:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Tra (Talk) 22:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Garion96 (talk) 22:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Sarah 23:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support Midorihana _(talk) _(contribs) 23:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Support; user created his account on a Saturday. – Steel 23:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Oppose

Better as a clerk. Neil ☎ 10:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Porcupine ( prickle me! · contribs · status) 16:22, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Ripberger 20:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Cabal member. New blood needed. 74.200.75.5
Ip's can't vote This is a Secret ^account 03:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Nothing personal. Atropos 06:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose, moral oppose. -- Aqwis ( talk – contributions) 12:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Haber ( talk) 01:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose - The arbcom is evil, so any candidate who chooses to participate in it in any manner shows poor judgment. Gentgeen ( talk) 03:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose. ArbCom needs fresh blood, not another of the "usual suspects". Nothing personal! Lankiveil ( talk) 10:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC). reply
Oppose Personal! -- D-Boy ( talk) 21:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Vagary ( talk) 11:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Tizio 18:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strong Oppose His background as a New York litigation attorney would make it difficult for him to combat litigiousness and to keep Wikipedia open. He has supported blocking several serious contributors for foolish comments, e.g. [1], and I, for one, would not want to see more support for limits on participation. Luqman Skye ( talk) 12:13, 12 December 2007 (UTC) further comments are on talk page ( talk) 06:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose Dezidor ( talk) 10:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose with a message. Per Neil. Bradley is the best Clerk in ArbCom history! It would be a shame for him to fall victim to the Peter Principle. Of course this objection, along with all the others, are meaningless. So congrads Brad! But please note-It is ok to be a politician and lawyer, as long as you don't become a partisan and advocate. The writers create the 'Pedia; not the janitors, crats, wikilawyers or policy wonks. Popularity is fleeting, doing the right thing is forever. Best of luck (you'll need it)-- R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) ( talk) 22:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Do you really think you've understand the Peter Principle? If he's the Best, he's actually not climbed high enough. The he's here at a good position. Marcus Cyron ( talk) 19:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Oppose. Nothing personal, I just want to give more support for my chosen candidate. Gen. von Klinkerhoffen ( talk) 01:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Newyorkbrad

Support

Oppose

Newyorkbrad

Support

Oppose

Videos

Websites

Encyclopedia

Facebook