This user may have left Wikipedia. Corvus cornix has not edited Wikipedia since April 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hello, I hope that you will reconsider. Four plus years of contributing and over 33,000 edits? That's impressive. Thank you for all you've done to make this a better encyclopedia. And then one administrator mistakenly uses the word "vandalism"? That person was wrong to use that word in this case. Please let it pass. I hope that you will return soon. I wish you well. Cullen328 ( talk) 06:13, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
It's plain to see that the admin got your dander up. But be careful what you say. His user page has indicated his adminship since December of 2008. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
...leave in a minute and a huff! LessHeard vanU ( talk) 12:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Fainites barley scribs 15:17, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Corvus cornix. I am sorry this bad thing happened to you. Please don't abandon your wiki-career over this. The opinion of WP:Randy in Boise shouldn't matter to you (even if he is an admin). Regards, -- Diannaa ( Talk) 21:07, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
It should matter, though, that you "templated a regular", which is considered impolite, and also didn't do any investigation to see if he really was an admin. So this "bad thing that happened to you", is around 50 percent of your own making. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
.. your calmer sense prevail .
Rich
Farmbrough, 02:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC).
Hello Corvus cornix. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Me TV (TV series), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A2: The article is being re-written in English, and I could not find it at another langauge Wikipedia, only on mirrors. Thank you. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 03:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 18:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Islamic Assembly of North America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Sorry for the template.
Bearian (
talk) 22:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MYSPACEDOTCOM. Since you had some involvement with the MYSPACEDOTCOM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Promenade Pictures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promenade Pictures (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx ( talk) 15:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. Corvus cornix has not edited Wikipedia since April 2011. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hello, I hope that you will reconsider. Four plus years of contributing and over 33,000 edits? That's impressive. Thank you for all you've done to make this a better encyclopedia. And then one administrator mistakenly uses the word "vandalism"? That person was wrong to use that word in this case. Please let it pass. I hope that you will return soon. I wish you well. Cullen328 ( talk) 06:13, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
It's plain to see that the admin got your dander up. But be careful what you say. His user page has indicated his adminship since December of 2008. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:03, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
...leave in a minute and a huff! LessHeard vanU ( talk) 12:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
Fainites barley scribs 15:17, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Corvus cornix. I am sorry this bad thing happened to you. Please don't abandon your wiki-career over this. The opinion of WP:Randy in Boise shouldn't matter to you (even if he is an admin). Regards, -- Diannaa ( Talk) 21:07, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
It should matter, though, that you "templated a regular", which is considered impolite, and also didn't do any investigation to see if he really was an admin. So this "bad thing that happened to you", is around 50 percent of your own making. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
.. your calmer sense prevail .
Rich
Farmbrough, 02:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC).
Hello Corvus cornix. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Me TV (TV series), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A2: The article is being re-written in English, and I could not find it at another langauge Wikipedia, only on mirrors. Thank you. PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 03:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
--The Olive Branch 18:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Islamic Assembly of North America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. Sorry for the template.
Bearian (
talk) 22:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MYSPACEDOTCOM. Since you had some involvement with the MYSPACEDOTCOM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Promenade Pictures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promenade Pictures (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx ( talk) 15:46, 2 November 2019 (UTC)