This user may have left Wikipedia. Longhair has not edited Wikipedia since December 6, 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
Apologies for leaving a message here as well as on my talk page, but I'm not sure whether you also watch talk pages of IP addresses after leaving a message there. I noticed that you reverted my edit to 2020 in arthropod paleontology, but in a message you only mentioned that it appearing unconstructive, and it's not clear to me what it was exactly that caused the revert. Regards-- 188.147.32.84 ( talk) 21:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
So I noticed that one of the things that can get a Wikipedia page taken down is if it's not "notable". My anarchy server will never be as big as something like 2b2t or hypixel, but would it be okay to use Wikipedia as a base, so that It can grow as my server gets more popular? I am completely new to making content on Wikipedia, i didn't even know there was an article wizard that's how little I know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DraconicPiggy ( talk • contribs)
Hello, Longhair,
Looks like this page might need to be protected. I saw on the Deletion log that you recently deleted it but it's been recreated. Liz Read! Talk! 00:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
I added a section to Brusatte's bio about his work on Jurassic World: Dominion, saying that he had been involved in the introduction of feathered dinosaurs to the film franchise. The source was a tweet he made. I understand that Twitter is Twitter, but it is coming directly from Brusatte, so it's essentially a primary source. I figured that statements made by public figures about themselves, regardless of platform, were acceptable citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue Monkeys from Outer Space ( talk • contribs)
I opened a SPI report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CONSURE MEDICALS PVT LTD for two accounts which you already blocked. The user has freely admitted creating multiple accounts using at least seven different email addresses, and is doing so for the purposes of undisclosed paid editing. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 14:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
how tf did you find that, seriously 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
I even put spaces and switched words around 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
to be clear i'll easily come back on another account, but i don't know how you are "busy in real life" and find stuff like that 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey, this is my first article I am publishing and want to figure why the last was deleted. Don't want to be breaking rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corai Quinn ( talk • contribs)
Hello, I have no idea why this happened, the notification was sent out using Twinkle and it somehow replaced your block message. My apologies, and thank you for the block. -- Ashley yoursmile! 06:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
how tf did you find that, seriously 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
I even put spaces and switched words around 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
to be clear i'll easily come back on another account, but i don't know how you are "busy in real life" and find stuff like that 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
So do you watch IronManCap's page or what 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 15:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi you delete this page https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:New_user_landing_page&page=Hooman+Saffari but everything is was right you can check it by yourself on imdb https://www.imdb.com/name/nm12538758/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoomansf ( talk • contribs) 16:19, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Could you revdel the edits and edit summaries of this IP? It's WP:LTA/GRP or copycat, and the edits contain links to attack sites run by GRP containing highly abusive libel aimed at several admins and other users. Such links have usually been revdelled, such as on my talk page. Thank you. Java Hurricane 04:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
Hi Longhair,
I wrote an article earlier this year that was review and edits were suggested. Today I made those edits but now the article was deleted due to principle (don't write articles about yourself). I am under the impression that it's quite normal that artists contribute to wikipedia themselves. Some of my works are difficult to find and people often refer to the missing wiki page were such information may be found. As a professor I find students are similarly asking about my presence on wikipedia. I could hire or ask someone else to write the article but that appears to be a bit silly to me. Have you reviewed my latest edits? If so, what in your mind is still missing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenrikAlbert ( talk • contribs)
Going through CAT:UNBLOCK again. I agree with this block, it seems reasonable.
The response from the editor seems promising. They have chosen an appropriate name, they say their previous name was from a defunct software company.
They claim they are just a fan of the radio station and that they based the format on the article Zenith Classic Rock which seems consistent.
I have pointed out to them the COI, SPAM, and NOTABILITY policies. I have pointed out that their radio station probably does not meet our notability requirements. I have asked them where they do intend to edit if unblocked.
Assuming their responses to these concerns are reasonable and I keep an eye on them after, how do you feel about me unblocking? Also please let me know if you have any other concerns to add. Thank you. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair, this ip is a sockpuppet of Walter Ezequiel Matthysse Jr., globally banned by autobiographical spam. Regards Valdemar2018 ( talk) 10:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Longhair,
Thank you for your messages. I appreciate the information and direction.
I am new to Wikipedia (editing) and certainly wish to comply.
I am new to Northpoint, and I noticed errors or things which could have been stated better or differently. Thus, I entered corrections. If I have erred, my apologies, and I will do what is needed to correct.
Any guidance you have would be appreciated, and if I have missed something, I certainly wish to correct that as well. Thank you, TH — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrThomasHarrison ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Well, good to hearing from you. I messaging you regarding the reverted page which i contributed. I have read through wikipedia guide and I always ensure to follow their guide before supply any information. Hence, I updated a link and it was reverted by you because you saw it as spam but well, any resource I supply, it was related to the topic of discussion, as such to encourage us for continuous updating of wikipedia, our effort should always be considered as our mission is to keep wikipedia legacy going.
Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frediemie ( talk • contribs)
Dear Longhair, the links to external pages you deleted were in fact not in accordance with Wikipedia standards, once they were the body of the article. But they are important information for ISAT users since there few known open source implementations. Implement ISAT is a non-trivial task, allow the readers to know about the existing codes is important. In this sense, I will again include the links in the article, but this time in the external references section.
Thank you for monitoring the Leigh Harris wikipedia page. Her husband Rick Ledbetter is using it for self promotion. He delved into recordings she forbid him to touch when she was alive, and "remastered" them, at times with disastrous results. He is marketing them on her Bandcamp page and has arranged that he reap with money generated from sales. He is fully aware this was against her wishes and was only able to do this after her death.
The CD "Home" was released in 2007 not 2018. What was released in 2018 was his remaster of the original. That date needs correcting.
Deevaleigh (
talk) 21:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)deevaleigh
Please note: New revisions by user 2600:6C40:5800:1298:19B8:E19E:894F:6A0A2600:6C40:5800:1298:19B8:E19E:894F:6A0A made 29 August from a mobile device are reverting to content from edits made 14 July 2021 at 2:13. Back Door Blues Revue was an after hours “Open Mic” style jam with musicians dropping in after their gigs. Leigh Harris, among other musicians, sat in a few times. It was not a band she “fronted” New edits violate COI, lack neutral POV, has ongoing paid editor issues, lacks objectivity/encyclopedic tone, and is promotional. Based on former revisions, new editor possibly a sock puppet. As Leigh Harris is deceased and no longer contributing musical works, her legacy is complete. Would it be feasible to remove the aforementioned violations and then lock the page? Deevaleigh ( talk) 17:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Deevaleigh
The wording was extremely biased and inaccurate, the wording was fixed to be more neutral and accurate, less biased and inflamatory. If you are opposed to accuracy, professionalism and neutrality, you are demeaning your own credibility. There's no 'source' needed to reword "attack" to "protest", when there was no attack, and it was merely a protest, contrary to the hyperbole and hysteria being pushed by one side, the same side that calls domestic terrorist attacks, 'peaceful protests' by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.5.135 ( talk • contribs)
Can you please revert back to this version. This should not be added until the RfC request about such addition is completed. Thank you. Davide King ( talk) 21:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for telling me, that you have removed that external link. but this link might be helpful for those people who are seeking for Jobs in India. We at DailySarkariResults.com provides job information (several types of govt jobs) at one place. we collect all the job information from interenet resources, news, employment News and many other places and put the correct information on this website. So in my opinion, please add this url DailySarkariResults.Com in a reference lists.
Hope, you understand.
thanks & Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anilvermait01 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for your reason to revert my edit at River Valley High School. I am thinking of including it in List of major crimes in Singapore (2000–present) since it is now confirmed to be a student killing his classmate NelsonLee20042020 ( talk) 07:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Edit war I am not intending.
I have used the talk page. I have added international sources from several countries. I have made modifications. Yet the other guy just blanks out the entire section. His/her reasoning is very odd. He/she makes up things that is not wikipedia policy, like saying that only when there is negligence on the part of the school can it be in an article. Please help. Are you an admin? Charliestalnaker ( talk) 05:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
To me the idea that NOTNEWS applies to what may potentially be the first case of domestic terrorism (or at least the first case of somebody getting killed) in a Singaporean school is rather goofy. Separate arguments raised elsewhere, like the event is not notable in itself because only one victim died, instead of many ala a typical US school shooting, sound absurd and callous. I wonder if you have any thoughts regarding this. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 07:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Please re-read the very earnest and well-meaning userpage again. That user did not state that 3 people were sharing the account, the user disclosed that "any new pages created" would represent joint work by a team of three people. The appropriate response here would be to advise them that this is not acceptable under Wikipedia rules, rather than to issue an indefinite block as if the person were some LTA. See also WP:BITE.
I have no COI and no relation to the APS other than that several articles on my watchlist are for scholars who are members there, so that I noticed a sudden pattern on my watchlist due to multiple reversions of the useful information about their memberships. E.g. [1] [2] etc. HouseOfChange ( talk) 11:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contribution and revision on the page with reference to this user, I10love9kangaroos84.
It should be noted that users 203.220.186.201 and Nospamalot, who made edits to the page, are very likely the same person. This person is a known political opponent of the subject, who commenced editing the page on 14 July, making many more edits from 19-20 July. This person has no intention to constructively contribute to the page, only to frame the subject in a negative light in an attempt to discredit the subject, vandalise the page and advantage their own political agenda.
With respect to the edit under discussion, as re-added to the page, this was originally added by Nospamalot (2 contributions overall) with a comment: "Was alerted to the whitewashing of this page...[the subject was] a colourful member of the government from 2016-19 who featured prominently in the media across a number of high-profile events, which seem to have been removed from this page. Added with full citations from credible news sources"
There has been no "whitewashing" of the page with respect to the new content added by Nospamalot. The "high-profile" events referred to as having been "removed from this page" were never removed from the page as they were never on there to begin with (as evidenced throughout the pages edit history). These are totally new additions to the page added only by Nospamalot, the content of which has never been on the page before now.
In terms of the content, while Nospamalot has provided "sources", the content either is defamatory, inaccurate, does not present a full picture or attempts to frame the subject in a negative light via 'guilt by association' for matters outside of the control of the subject.
With respect to the first removal via this userpage, I10love9kangaroos84, the comment added was: "These changes are an attempt at harassment of the subject and page vandalism by subject opponents based on incomplete or incorrect information. For example, it must be noted that the original reporting regarding Gretals was incorrect in that Gretals had not received a Commonwealth grant at the time...[the subject] invested. While...[the subject] had mentioned this company being the successful recipient of a grant in Parliament, Gretals had later rejected that grant prior to...[the subject's] SMSF investing in it."
When Nospamalot then readded the content, the comments again removing this content noted the defamatory and incorrect nature of the content by utilising the tags " Hello, I'm I10love9kangaroos84. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hello, I'm I10love9kangaroos84. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hello, I'm I10love9kangaroos84. Your recent edit(s) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hello, I'm I10love9kangaroos84. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. "
The first allegation at hand in Nospamalot's content was that the subject's self-managed superannuation fund had invested in a company with less than 25 shareholders that had allegedly received a government grant, creating an alleged constitutional issue. This was later totally discredited given that Gretals had actually rejected the grant before the time the subject's superannuation fund invested in them, meaning the original media reports relying on a speech to Parliament were also incorrect. This was confirmed via both statements in online media articles from Gretals ("Gretals “did not proceed” with projects that were to be financed through the global connections fund. “We never received funding,” he said), as well as legal advice from David Bennett QC putting the subject totally in the clear and discrediting his political opposition's claims. It should be noted that the subject considered commencing defamation proceedings against the original media sources who printed the later discredited information, but determined not to due to the cost and effort involved.
The inclusion of this content on the page by Nospamalot with an early media source, containing later discredited information, is only therefore intended to put the subject under a cloud to try to discredit him.
It should also be noted that this statement made by Nospamalot is also unsourced and totally incorrect: "The parliamentary vote to refer...[the subject] to the High Court was defeated and...[the subject] continued to serve as Member...and contested the 2019 federal election." There was no vote to refer the subject to the High Court after the above information discrediting the original claims came out, so this statement by Nospamalot is also incorrect.
The second allegation at hand in Nospamalot's content relates to environmental grants. While the Facebook posts and media release themselves were clumsily worded (as explained by the subject at the time), in the actual video announcements within those same original Facebook posts the then Minister for the Environment and the subject made it quite clear to local organisations (being organisations who had submitted EOIs for the program) that those would be environmental projects that would be nominated under the environmental grants program only once it formally opened, with funding to flow if both the subject and the government were re-elected. Again, this was an issue brought up by the subject's opponents that was discontinued by them upon them getting no traction.
The third allegation at hand in Nospamalot's content relates to government decisions and actions beyond the subject's direct control, again though attempting to put the subject 'under a cloud' to discredit him. Firstly, it is true that the subject joined the Treasurer to announce funding for commuter car parks prior to the previous election. Nospamalot is incorrect though in stating that "these plans were scrapped in 2021". The State Government in 2021 rejected building the car parking on their land, but the funding itself is not lost. The Federal Government has instead been actively working with the Local Government to build these car parks on local government land instead, with discussions ongoing. The remainder of Nospamalot's commentary then does not relate to the subject. The subject was not involved in the administration of the programme, nor in determining which commuter car parks would be chosen to be funded through the program. This was done at the ministerial/executive/departmental level. While media concerns have been raised recently about the Federal Government's administration of this program, this does not relate directly to the subject. Thus, this is yet another attempt by Nospamalot to embroil the subject by attempting to discredit him and 'put him under a cloud' of guilt by association.
In summary, please respectively consider removing this recently added (and re-added) section written and added by 'Nospamalot' from the subject's Wikipedia page, particularly given it contains discredited, defamatory and incorrect information. Please also keep an eye on the page to prevent this vandalism of the page occurring, which as mentioned is being done only to frame the subject in a negative light in an attempt to discredit the subject, vandalise the page and advantage Nospamalot's own political agenda.
It must be noted that, while this page has existed for years, the last week is the first time that serious attempted vandalism of the page, for a political agenda, has occurred.
Thank you very much for your time looking into this matter.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Not sure how to reply as a sub-comment to your reply, so apologies for the separate post.
Re your reply, so what is the solution?
It should be noted that as soon as your warning/comments were seen, this user I10love9kangaroos84 has made no further undo or changes to the page. And you mentioned on the I10love9kangaroos84 talk page that "If you think I made a mistake" to go directly to you, which has been done.
Currently, Nospamalot is being allowed to put up commentary (including inaccurate and irrelevant information) to deliberately discredit and frame the subject in a negative light for political purposes, which as noted in the previous comment on this talk page also includes unsourced and incorrect information: e.g. "The parliamentary vote to refer...[the subject] to the High Court was defeated and...[the subject] continued to serve...and contested the 2019 federal election." where no such vote ever occurred.
You've also acknowledged this as being sockpuppet activity.
If any attempts are made to even edit or clarify this information added by Nospamalot (then re-added by yourself), then you've indicated that further page changes may be blocked. This then allows for this information without changes or clarification to continue on the page.
It should, separately, be noted that 203.220.186.201 removed multiple sets of fully sourced and cited information without any ramifications. But in this case where information was removed written by Nospamalot that selectively used sources, in the situation that Nospamalot was trying to frame the subject in a negative manner for political purposes, action was taken to restore this content (in favour of Nospamalot).
It would be therefore asked that this section, which is damaging to the subject and incorrect in many regards, be removed by you as an Administrator until a conversation, say over a talk page, can be held regarding this content.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 01:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Your looking in-depth into this matter is much appreciated.
And, apologies, as your comment "The article will likely be protected from editing until a consensus is reached on the content if the behaviour that has occurred until now is going to be the way forward" had been taken to mean further edits of that section added by Nospamalot might be taken as an edit war resulting in protection of that section for editing, and thus incorrect, unsourced, and/or incomplete (aka 'framing') information then remaining.
Also, apologies for using the word "acknowledgement", noting you have said that "I suspected sockpuppet activity; I didn't acknowledge it".
For context, in this case, edits of this page commenced on 14 July 2021 from 203.220.186.201. Changes made included reframing previously neutral sentences such as "serving as its Federal Member of Parliament from 2016-19." to instead read "and serving until his defeat at the 2019 Federal Election.", as well as other changes such as adding that the subject had been unsuccessful in a recent preselection.
It should be noted that this person is a known political opponent of the subject, identified based on their previous edits using the same IP address. The context is that the subject came second in a preselection on 10 July 2021, so this political opponent has attempted to alter the page to undermine and discredit the subject to reduce the chance of them re-emerging as a political candidate in the future, which also though has an impact on the subject's current employment prospects.
After these changes were made, further changes to the page were made to re-assert neutrality and to make other updates. It effectively has snowballed from there, with further changes made by 203.220.186.201 that became increasingly more malicious as edits and corrections were made. 203.220.186.201 also made edits to other pages edited by 123.208.64.237, such as edits to /info/en/?search=Modern_Slavery_Act_2015 by going through publicly available edits previously made under IP address 123.208.64.237.
Edits back and forth have currently reached close to neutrality on these other sections though.
However, this has then snowballed further and led to the recent section being added by Nospamalot (aka 202.220.186.201) which is much more malicious in targeting the subject to try discredit them, including using both unsourced information and sourced information without full context to try 'frame' the subject in a negative light (information which was later was discredited by other sourced information as previously explained to you).
This more malicious section was also added with an accompanying dishonest edit, where Nospamalot states that the subject "...featured prominently in the media across a number of high-profile events, which seem to have been removed from this page." noting that all this information added by Nospamalot was new to the page and had never been previously removed (as evidenced by the page's edit history).
Surely Wikipedia pages should not be able to be misused by political opponents in attempts to discredit political (or ex-political) subjects and to advantage themselves politically? These malicious edits should be deemed as vandalism and non-neutral edits, and thus disallowed.
If this section is removed, the page would be pretty much neutral in its current form otherwise.
Noted also upon almost completing this reply to you is your referral of the page to the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons noticeboard. That is appreciated. Adding to that, given your involvement in this matter, your direct looking at the history of the edits would be much appreciated when you have time, given you are busy offline currently.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 04:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
As requested, the usernames/IP addresses that are editing the same (being extremely likely the same person) are 203.220.186.201 (a known political opponent of the subject) and username Nospamalot. On the current version of the Wikipedia page, while there are parts that could do with some minor work, this section is the major problematic one that is not neutral. If that section were to be removed, and taken to a talk page discussion, that would provide some way forward for editors to discuss without article disruption as a possible way forward.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 06:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi LongHair, I respecfully urge you to publish the biography as it is not mine. It belongs to person who has done alot for the social welfare and human rights in Pakistan. Please publish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsptiofficial ( talk • contribs)
Hi. Thanks for the quick response. He is my mentor, thats why I published it Wajahat178 ( talk) 14:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the quick response. He is my mentor, thats why I published it Wajahat178 ( talk) 14:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Your looking in-depth into this matter is much appreciated.
And, apologies, as your comment "The article will likely be protected from editing until a consensus is reached on the content if the behaviour that has occurred until now is going to be the way forward" had been taken to mean further edits of that section added by Nospamalot might be taken as an edit war resulting in protection of that section for editing, and thus incorrect, unsourced, and/or incomplete (aka 'framing') information then remaining.
Also, apologies for using the word "acknowledgement", noting you have said that "I suspected sockpuppet activity; I didn't acknowledge it".
For context, in this case, edits of this page commenced on 14 July 2021 from 203.220.186.201. Changes made included reframing previously neutral sentences such as "serving as its Federal Member of Parliament from 2016-19." to instead read "and serving until his defeat at the 2019 Federal Election.", as well as other changes such as adding that the subject had been unsuccessful in a recent preselection.
It should be noted that this person is a known political opponent of the subject, identified based on their previous edits using the same IP address. The context is that the subject came second in a preselection on 10 July 2021, so this political opponent has attempted to alter the page to undermine and discredit the subject to reduce the chance of them re-emerging as a political candidate in the future, which also though has an impact on the subject's current employment prospects.
After these changes were made, further changes to the page were made to re-assert neutrality and to make other updates. It effectively has snowballed from there, with further changes made by 203.220.186.201 that became increasingly more malicious as edits and corrections were made. 203.220.186.201 also made edits to other pages edited by 123.208.64.237, such as edits to /info/en/?search=Modern_Slavery_Act_2015 by going through publicly available edits previously made under IP address 123.208.64.237.
Edits back and forth have currently reached close to neutrality on these other sections though.
However, this has then snowballed further and led to the recent section being added by Nospamalot (aka 202.220.186.201) which is much more malicious in targeting the subject to try discredit them, including using both unsourced information and sourced information without full context to try 'frame' the subject in a negative light (information which was later was discredited by other sourced information as previously explained to you).
This more malicious section was also added with an accompanying dishonest edit, where Nospamalot states that the subject "...featured prominently in the media across a number of high-profile events, which seem to have been removed from this page." noting that all this information added by Nospamalot was new to the page and had never been previously removed (as evidenced by the page's edit history).
Surely Wikipedia pages should not be able to be misused by political opponents in attempts to discredit political (or ex-political) subjects and to advantage themselves politically? These malicious edits should be deemed as vandalism and non-neutral edits, and thus disallowed.
If this section is removed, the page would be pretty much neutral in its current form otherwise.
Noted also upon almost completing this reply to you is your referral of the page to the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons noticeboard. That is appreciated. Adding to that, given your involvement in this matter, your direct looking at the history of the edits would be much appreciated when you have time, given you are busy offline currently.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 04:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
As requested, the usernames/IP addresses that are editing the same (being extremely likely the same person) are 203.220.186.201 (a known political opponent of the subject) and username Nospamalot. On the current version of the Wikipedia page, while there are parts that could do with some minor work, this section is the major problematic one that is not neutral. If that section were to be removed, and taken to a talk page discussion, that would provide some way forward for editors to discuss without article disruption as a possible way forward.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 06:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 11:25, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Im unsure why you deleted my link, it wasn't inappropriate, it was definitely within the subject matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.213.21.230 ( talk • contribs)
Hello Longhair. My explanation for my relationship to my Royal Hawaiian Monarchy is not advertising as my family are the Throne but is an introduction to Wikipedia as I see so much wrong history is somehow left on the media and here too but should be added to all valid encyclopedias. HRM Queen Leona Leimomi Perrells ( talk) 08:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
So, the problem is putting copies on my pages here? My family are historic. Please check your sources. I do also have a Royal Guard through the State today. Perhaps you should check with them. I don’t think Wikipedia would like you inhibiting history either. HRM Queen Leona Leimomi Perrells ( talk)
Hello,
I just tried to change coordinates on a lake in France. I cannot find how to properly do coordinates and I deeply apologize for the inconvenience. Could you please help me?
Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by GdeMlzc ( talk • contribs)
Hi
Do you know the full story of his life and what he has done, don’t update his wiki page with only positive comments
Do you know what dirty deeds he has done, just because he produced movies , this person does not deserve a Wikipedia page .
What is his contribution? He has cheated many ppl to produce movies, starting from his gf urf ex wife to all his close friends Don’t be mersmerised by his words — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.192.163 ( talk • contribs)
Hi
There was a recent press conference by Rakshit Shetty on the type of criminal activity he has done, not paying money to daily wage workers in the set- why isn’t this updated
Who is grieving with you
Why have you not mentioned that he has been divorced and the type of harassment he has done to his wife, why ain’t the page is updated with those .
He has cheated and has a case filed in tumkur court for fraud and he has done forgery, get your facts straight and then update his page
YGM JarrahTree 06:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, is it possible to uncheck the "create talk page" button when blocking accounts with abusive usernames like these? That will deny recognition to these users. aeschylus ( talk) 01:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
How can be BabyDogeCoin advertising? All crypto currencies have a own page on wikipedia. Small, and even big crypto. BabyDogeCoin is listed on 20+ big news mainstream.
Put it back please, google yourself on news.google.com 'BabyDogecoin' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moontime777 ( talk • contribs)
Good explained! I took your adivice! I changed it and took me 1 hour to make it clean and neat for readers.
Can u check sir?
Thank you!
Longhair our article in the making has been deleted. Apparantly our account has been blocked due to promotion or advertising. Can you please clarify what we did wrong and how we can solve this issue? Thanks in advance
My name is Ariful Matz and I wish that I need your help to make my personal official wikipedia page. Thanks and Regards Steven Matz ( talk) 07:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Please, leave the critique, it's based on facts and expirience, why would you remove it? New players, if they would like to buy the game must know what they buy before they do it. What's the point in removing the critique? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowBoss717 ( talk • contribs)
Hi there
I was creating english version of my guru aripiral viswam, which has already a page in TELUGU
I am not doing anything suspicious or misleading
Kindly revoke the page
https://te.wikipedia.org/wiki/అరిపిరాల_విశ్వం
Is the page , check and respond — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anandaghana ( talk • contribs)
Can i recreate my Page User Id : anandaghana
Wikipedia says ..as it has already deleted the page, content similar to it again if recreated needs to be authorised by the user who deleted it, check and confirm Shri. Long hair
Thanks for blocking User:City_of_Branch. Appreciate you being Administrator. Following the agreed rules, I will be happy to have the user back - editing wikipedia, as the user appears to be very knowledgable about the city and it's surroundings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinecar ( talk • contribs)
I just wanted to say that I'm not sure this user was given a fair evaluation of their unblock request. Though I won't contest your block in any way, I did want to note that I think they may have had a valid unblock request that should've been heard out. Thanks. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲( talk) 23:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey Longhair! Can I manually revert British Tiger’s edit which is tagged as ‘use of deprecated (unreliable) source’? As it is tagged that, I do not thing it should stay on the page for very long. Is it ok if I revert it or will I get an edit war warning? KejuFuru ( talk) 03:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
I am talking about a recent edit by BritishTiger whose edit was tagged as ‘use of deprecated (unreliable) sources’. The user who got blocked for 48 hrs. Yes, i’ll be careful about the edit summaries, I can understand what you’re saying and thanks a lot for your help and guidance! Don’t worry I’ll explain things properly in the edit summary. KejuFuru ( talk) 06:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair, BritishTiger has started doing the same thing again. So many warnings but no learning. He just keeps edit warring and adds deprecated sources without any explanation in the edit summaries, I even told him what not to add to a page by linking https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deprecated_sources in the warning but he is still asking me how his edits are unreliable. This is really frustrating and getting out of my hands so please take some strict actions mate. He is also removing some content without any proper explanation. Please do something… KejuFuru ( talk) 11:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey Longhair! I need some help, first answer that can Wiki admins revert those edits which non-admin editors can’t? Can you Wikipedia admins revert the edits which say, “The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits; if you wish to undo the change, it must be done manually.” ? KejuFuru ( talk) 07:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
👍 ok KejuFuru ( talk) 10:35, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Ensuring Wikipedia remains good for everyone including two of my sub user pages which have been reverted. Iggy ( Swan) ( Contribs) 11:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC) |
Hi - do you really think that a hard block was necessary for Granite Cove Big Sur? I took a look at the deleted userpage, it looked to me like someone was trying to write an article about an historic building (something I do quite often!), but didn't understand how to go about it. I didn't see anything promotional in the deleted text, maybe I overlooked something though? I just want to be sure we're not biting an innocent newb. Girth Summit (blether) 09:13, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
COI again on Leigh Harris page Deevaleigh ( talk) 16:37, 6 August 2021 (UTC)deevaleigh
Hi there,
I'm not sure how to use this talk thing but here goes!
You sent me an email re some changes I made to the bay 93.9 Wiki page a while ago.
I am not paid for those edits.
I'm not a social media specialist etc...
I'm merely an announcer at the station and thought I was doing my part to keep Wiki up to date as there was quite a bit of old info on the page.
The logo etc is our current logo.
I often look up radio stations on wiki as I work in the business and the bay page was way out of date and lacking up to date information - none of which was intended to be a "commercial"... I merely wanted the page to be correct and up to date.
I apologise if I broke any rules - I had no idea.
Sorry for not answering you back on the "talk page"...I tried to work out how to reply but I had no idea how to do it!
My apologies for not following the rules. It was not intentional and I was not acting on behalf of the company.
I'm not paid to update the page or asked by the company to update the page - I merely thought I was updating a page that was way out of date and was trying to do the right thing.
Kinds Regards,
Vk3crg ( talk) 09:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC) VK3CRG
Ms Harris, as you can read from her wiki page, passed away Sept of 2019. I am her husband and heir of her estate. After she passed, I finished her last CD (Waking up in Dreamland) and released it.
AFTER SHE PASSED, I FOUND A LOST BOX OF HER TAPES THAT RESULTED IN THE RELEASE OF 6 MORE CDS, AND I HAVE PRODUCED AND RELEASED THEM AND LISTED THEM ON HER WIKI PAGE AS A DISCOGRAPHY. FURTHER, I FOUND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT HER PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL HISTORY THAT NEEDS TO BE PUT ON HER WIKI PAGE TO CORRECT AND EXTEND WHAT IS THERE, SO I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU WOULD RESTORE HER PAGE TO THE REV I LAST PUT UP. I HAVE SPENT A LOT OF TIME RESEARCHING HER PROFESSIONAL HISTORY AND I WANT IT TO BE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. AND SOME THINGS THAT WERE INITIALLY PUT ON THE PAGE, LIKE JOHN MEUNIER WAS THE FIRST PERCOLATORS BASS PLAYER, AND THE FACT THAT SHE WAS IN ANOTHER BAND BEFORE THAT BAND, IS INACCURATE. REFERRING TO HER SON AS A'SCRUBOLOGIST' IS UNPROFESSIONAL, AND I WOULD PREFER TO USE TO CAJUN TERM FOR IT AND ADD THAT HE IS A VOCALIST. AND THESE ARE JUST 2 OF SEVERAL CHANGES THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED.
FRANKLY, I WISH I WAS MAKING MONEY FROM HER ESTATE BUT THE REALITY OF IT IS I'M IN THE RED. THE PERSON WHO POSTED THE ALERT - DEEVALEIGH IS A PERSON THAT HAS HAD AN AX TO GRIND EVER SINCE LEIGH GOT SICK WITH CANCER AND I BECAME HER SOLE CAREGIVER. HER STATEMENT TO THE AFFECT OF 'WHAT LEIGH DID NOT WANT" IS LUDICROUS, SINCE (IF IT IS WHO I THINK IT IS, BECAUSE IF THE WAY SHE PHRASED HER COMPLAINT) THIS PERSON DID NOT SEE OR TALK TO LEIGH IN THE LAST YEARS OF HER LIFE AND DIDN'T EVEN BOTHER TO COME TO HER FUNERAL. SHE HAS NO INTEREST WHAT SO EVER, OUTSIDE OF JUST TRYING TO DISRUPT MY EFFORTS TO GET LEIGH THE RECOGNITION SHE NEVER GOT WHILE SHE WAS ALIVE. THE ALLEGATION THAT I AM MAKING MONEY OFF WHAT I INHERITED ARE CRAZY. ALL I AM TRYING TO DO IS TO SECURE HER PLACE IN NEW ORLEANS MUSIC HISTORY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rick Ledbetter ( talk • contribs)
Hi - my article was recently deleted, I was adding a page for a site that was recently referenced. Would it be better if there where not any links to the site? Mainly placed the concept of the website and what information can be found on the website.
Thank you for you help Dtv.nvs ( talk) 01:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair, I notice that your deletion of the banned Egacommissioner's text at Euchre has effectively been reinstated by a newly created account, Slickmanz53. I wonder if that's a sockpuppet account. What do you think? Bermicourt ( talk) 09:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
We have not violated any policy. All the updates made were genuine and 100% correct there is no copy right violation at all. Kindly restore our page content & permit the last changes made thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BMSkendra ( talk • contribs)
Hi Longhair,
Could you give me some guidance on an article you tagged for speedy deletion?
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Property Financial ( talk • contribs)
Hello, I'm Longhair. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Alejandroeflores have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Longhair\talk 02:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Alejandro Evangelista Flores Sr./sandbox. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Longhair\talk 06:49, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Response: Please I would like to return back my Draft in the Sandbox Area to edit my mistake.I would like to know exact words from my draft that is forbidden.Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alejandro Evangelista Flores Sr. ( talk • contribs)
I have used all the reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lourenspoorter ( talk • contribs)
Hey, I've had a bunch of issues with new articles tagged by clueless newbie reviewers who have no clue what they're doing lately, so it seems I'm not autopatrolled?!? Is that something you can fix? The Drover's Wife ( talk) 13:42, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Why are you deleting an article that I've been working hard on and is based on fact.
I'm simply trying to make people aware of a topic that's not very well known on most of the internet but is something significant and interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phexcord Cult Member ( talk • contribs)
Nice one :). Learn something new every day off it, things I'd never known :) (although today is somewhat an exception because had to learn the first one some time back but never had known about the tragic incident near Alice) SHB2000 ( talk) 01:53, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
i do not know who you are. I do not know what you are insinuating nor have i been paid for any Wikipedia work.
Please do not contact me again. Shawn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShawnPiqueManagement ( talk • contribs)
It is unrepentant - and relentless - I do hope you might see to implement something or other, but as always, up to you... JarrahTree 09:11, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello There. I am trying to create a page for a UAE businessman. I have cited all references and local new articles I found about him. I would like your feedback on the page and if there is anything that needs attention. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greeshmagshetty ( talk • contribs)
Hello Longhair, I’m writing to you in your role as an administrator, hoping you can give me some advice.
I am aware of a Wikipedia user who has recently deleted all of his talk page apart from the welcome message he received 10 years ago (97,000 characters were deleted). My understanding is that this should not happen. WP:UP#DELTALK states that “User talk pages… are generally not deleted; they are usually needed for reference by other users …” I totally agree with this. I had a protracted dialogue with this particular person after he had reverted an image size and caption in one of my edits, an action that I considered to be unreasonable. In the end he backed down, but it is important this conversation and others that were on his talk page should be available for other people to read. In addition to his exchange of views with me, there were plenty of other discussions on this person’s talk page, many of them relating to disputes.
So my question is: Is there a place I can formally report that this person has deleted most of his talk page? I looked at WP:RAA, but nothing seems to fit because this is not a dispute, nor do I want this person blocked. I just want the statement in WP:UP#DELTALK to apply. If he has a good reason for deleting all this content, surely he should be required to state what it is. You can easily identify the person I’m referring to if you go to my talk page and check out No. 5 “Images sizes & captions”. Ikeshut2 ( talk) 04:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Looks like Fuerdai's gone into image related vandalism. [6] as well as module vandalism [7]... SHB2000 ( talk) 12:45, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair. After my recent (21 August) ANI report you blocked this user for 31 hours. Seems they have just resorted back to the same ways: unsourced genre additions. Could I trouble you to cast an eye please. Cheers. Rob van vee 05:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
You have tagged my page as COI. I did make changes to my own page and I'm sorry I did not know to put them in talk first. However, the changes were updates with good sources. Basically I wanted to foreground my more recent book (published in 2019) instead of the longer-ago book (2009).
Please advise me how the warnings can be removed from the page and what information, if any, is actually is in violation of wikipedia practices.
Carol Sklenicka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csklenicka ( talk • contribs)
Hello Longhair. Regarding your (now removed) response on
WP:UAA. Could you please provide the OTRS ticket where the user has proven their identity? If one does not exist, are you in the process of guiding the user to prove their identity?
If neither one of those seems to be the case, I'd like to ask you to reconsider your actions as, generally speaking, real world names belonging to identifiable individuals are usually blocked until they either a) change the username or b) prove their identity, per
WP:REALNAME. Thanks.
Melmann 19:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair,
I was just applying some edits to the sandbox page of Zoetalexandra about 'Bali: Island of the Dogs' when the sandbox was deleted. The edits I was applying were of constructive nature, citing additional sources. <ref> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2056526/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0 <ref>
I was also removing sections that may seem self promotional and adding information about the content.
Then I was about to answer the reasons why it should not be deleted, when it was deleted. Those reasons include the fact that this is the first film made to point out the scientific importance to these breeds of dogs to the understanding of animal genetics and history.
The author of the sandbox (Zoetalexandra) is not mentioned on the page she wrote, so I don't believe it's self-promotion there.
I'm hoping you can restore the page to the sandbox, and give us another chance to bring it into compliance with the rules.
Many thanks, Deanstormbird Stormbird ( talk) 09:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you recently deleted my article on a film called Bali: Island of the Dogs saying it was self promotion but I did not receive any money for the article or the film and I fail to see where the conflict of interest is. I happen to love to the film that I saw in Bali and went to look up more information about the film on Wikipedia but couldn't find anything so with the help of the IMDB I wrote the article. Apologies for not sourcing IMDB seeing as this is my first time writing an article for Wikipedia and I will quote sources from now on. Please can you tell me where the conflict is and why you "swiftly" deleted my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoetalexandra ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
/info/en/?search=Daniel_Dubois_(boxer)
This page, fight number 18 was a TKO and not a KO. I was editing/fixing the vandalism when you locked it down.
Just wanted to let you know as I no longer have edit access. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rattt89 ( talk • contribs)
Hello, you just deleted my contribution to the article: Parliament.
The contribution I made was not a advertisement - I'm creating a new article named "Public Parliaments" which could be the displayed in the article "Parliament".
My question, because I'm a begginner: Did you also deleted my "sandbox"? I can not find the content I published...
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samostvoj ( talk • contribs)
the source I used https://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/printable%20Matt%20FAQs.pdf
I wasn't sure how to add it. Also, I own a house in engelhard. some of the information I would want to add for engelhard comes from first-person familiarity with the town — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Engelhard ( talk • contribs)
I have tried before to respond. I am not paid to edit and I did edit my page, for which I apologized. I did not create the page and was doing minor edits to update it. Now it looks like someone wants to delete the page. I agree with the person who argues it should not be deleted. I am a writer of national and international reputation for my biographies of Raymond Carver and Alice Adams. My biography of Raymond Carver has been translated into six languages (2 versions of Chinese) and there is a tv show in the works about Alice Adams partially based on my biography of her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csklenicka ( talk • contribs)
Thank you so much for reverting and protecting many of the Springfield firearm pages. I've been compulsively editing them for over 4 months now and I was wondering if it'll ever end. If you can also undo my edits and protect the remaining Springfield gun pages that'll be great. If possible maybe revert them back to before April 2021 and also protect the pages indefinitely so something like this may not happen again. Thank you so much again I really appreciate it. SpringfieldRedemption ( talk) 20:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
1. Springfield Musket [8] 2. Springfield Model 1812 [9] 3. Springfield Model 1835 [10] 4. Springfield Model 1842 [11] 5. Springfield Model 1863 [12] 6. Springfield Model 1866 [13] 7. Springfield Model 1868 [14] 8. Springfield Model 1869 [15] 9. Springfield Model 1870 Navy [16] 10. Springfield Model 1871 [17] 11. Springfield Model 1873 [18] 12. Springfield Model 1877 [19] 13. Springfield Model 1888 [20] 14. Springfield Model 1892 [21] 15. Springfield Rifle [22]
Hello Longhair,
The information is outdated on the original page and it is just an update with the name of the new principal as well as hyperlinking all sources. I am not a staff nor a paid editor of St. Louis School. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179ThirdStreet ( talk • contribs)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
(still in effect) was perhaps a factor in this post. (I'm inclined to think that the whole thing is a CIR matter.) -- Hoary ( talk) 22:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
I so appreciate your help on this. I don't know how to answer people directly on FB -- and I really don't understand it very well. You summed up my answer succinctly and with respect and I am grateful.
All best to you --
Tim
How DOES one write directly to somebody who asks a question? I'm a journalist and I consider it my moral duty to try to answer questions from people who seem interested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimPageWriter ( talk • contribs)
Just read your message, thank you for the feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EyesInTheSky777 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for undoing the edit someone made to my talk page in which they added the {{deceased}} template to the top of it. As you can see I am definitely not dead yet. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor ( talk) ( Stupidity by me) 13:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danny Malin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Can you extend protection for at least a month please. Ten days is not very long. Govvy ( talk) 11:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Why the 3 reverts tonight on the school page pls? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eco-climber ( talk • contribs)
Hello Longhair, apologies for leaving a note on your Talk Page, but you did not respond to the comment I left beneath yours on my Talk Page on August 2nd, so I was unsure if you saw it.
You reversed my edit under the 'In Popular Culture' subheading of Karla Homolka's wiki page; I had corrected the 'his relationship' part of 'Lynda Véronneau together with writer Christiane Desjardins, wrote Lynda Véronneau: Dans L'Ombre de Karla, on the topic of his relationship with Homolka while in prison, published in 2005 by Les Éditions Voix Parallèles.' to 'her relationship' as Lynda Véronneau is a woman, not a man. Thank you. RaccoonCityPoliceDepartment ( talk) 20:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC) RaccoonCityPoliceDepartment
Hi, Longhair. You have create-protected DJ Lector, because it has been repeatedly recreated following deletion at AfD. Would you be willing to consider lifting the protection? I had deliberately decided not to protect it, because doing so might be likely to simply result in its being recreated under a different title, where it might escape attention, whereas it is easy to watch for re-creation under the old title. That decision did, in fact, pay off, because it was indeed re-created under the same title, by a different account that I didn't know about. (It seems that account was the original one, and the account which had previously created the article a sockpuppet.) If the title had already been salted at that time I would not have known about it, and so it might well have escaped deletion, and the sockpuppeteer escaped blocking. JBW ( talk) 21:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/Brandon2345
all the mor einteresting reflection is that no one else has gone there...
think maybe time for restorative turn off time.. JarrahTree 13:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
I wanted to express my personal appreciation for your expression of trust and support in my July RfA. My first few months have not been especially productive, but I did actually stand at the precipice of the edit window of the main page and not delete it. So I guess we'll be okay. If you see me act the fool or otherwise need my attention feel invited to call on me. BusterD ( talk) 17:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Longhair.
I just received your message about the COI about the creation of the page " Liam Cole ". I understand the policies, and yes I'm the artists' project manager, but nothing on the text is self-promoting but only stating some accomplishments and information about an artist that's signed to multiple major labels and worked with renowned artists but doesn't have a page on Wikipedia. Could you please explain how we could go about stating this information about the artist?
Thanks in advance, — Preceding unsigned comment added by LiamColeMusic ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for deleting User:Rupaa02. Two other users were created at the same time and posted the same Tamil language information about herbal drugs on their user page. Those tagged pages, yet to be deleted, are User:Muthuveni .M0812 and User:Rithika02. It's maybe not sockpuppetry to evade blocks, but it's definitely not regular user behaviour. 10mmsocket ( talk) 07:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Could you reprotect Bauhaus (band)? The RFC is not closed yet and has not been responded to and no consensus has yet been reached. Lynchenberg ( talk) 08:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Longhair, you removed an external link by mistake or misunderstanding. I fully read (and thought understood) the guidelines. The site I linked to is dedicated to the Whitcombe surname and includes several notables such as Andrea Whitcombe - an ex Olympian and World Champion. Please could you be specific why this site should not be linked, or re-instate it. Thanks. -- Adrianwhitcombe ( talk) 09:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
The No Spam Barnstar | |
For your exceptional service at blocking spam accounts reported to UAA. Helen( 💬 📖) 19:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC) |
Please delete these 2 redirect userpages User:Pakialamerozz and User:Pakialamerzz, those userpages are redirected to my userpage. Can you delete that. Thanks. clipred ( talk) 09:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
u are very good moderator 👍👍 Citycountryball2000 ( talk) 18:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Longhair,
Thank you so much for leaving me feedback. I really appreciate it. As you can tell, I am totally new to Wikipedia contribution.
Some information about myself as the article author and what I am aiming to record:
{{
connected contributor (paid)}}
at the top of the page, filling it in, and saving as directed (
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#How_to_disclose_a_COI)/info/en/?search=Conference_on_Neural_Information_Processing_Systems /info/en/?search=Professional_Developers_Conference /info/en/?search=Build_(developer_conference)
I look forward to hearing from you and I so appreciate your guidance. Kindest MariaPass ( talk) 19:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)MariaPass
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
So, who is that person, and what is wrong with them? Drmies ( talk) 00:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! You put a COI tag on Steven Hassan recently. It was not clear which editor(s) you were referring to with a COI. I was going to go through and review edits and see if I could clean it up. I am assuming this user: [23] Just wanted to see if there was more. Thanks! — Charles Edward ( Talk | Contribs) 18:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
didnt get back re the staff list query - nope - think it is opportunistic reversion... JarrahTree 01:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking. Very likely that Personnnnnnnn1 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is the exact same person - identical edits to user talk page and a spam draft. 10mmsocket ( talk) 07:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Longhair: I have come to you to ask for the right of IP free blocking, in fact I use public networks such as Broadband, Cafe and WIFI on the English Wikipedia, this IP is currently blocked for about 1 year by Gram87 At this time a call has been made for my mobile, you know that the IP address of the mobile is always changing, if you give this right to me, then I will never mind editing if the IP is blocked.Best Regards. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 07:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello I left a message on my talk page, not sure if you would prefer to talk here. Thanks HollyMM ( talk) 17:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mate,
Thanks for helping me, I am sure you would have found it rightful to do. I know that she has been inspiring many such sociopreneurs so I added it.
Thank you once again, see you around the Wiki World! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianVenture ( talk • contribs) 18:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
I made changes to update my page. Please restore them.
I have had a gender change and am now Eaton Hamilton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.108.178 ( talk) 05:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair. Thx 4 help b4. I am autistic & don’t know what to do about the Bromsgrove School page.
User 1912 who also edits the school results, school fees & school very specific & unique info, so I suspect is actually an account linked to the school.
They have taken down the sexual abuse section I added under the existing school abuse section. ( one of the abuses was after a marriage to an ex-pupil be a senior staff member, who then went on to sleep with other pupils). That person was sent to prison.
It’s far, far from the only case at this school of abuse. It’s in the public interest that this data is recorded on the school Wiki, as they are Clear, Important, referenced independently based facts.
This wiki should not be a public school advert page & there again not an anti school hate page either. I was trying to be (successfully?) very careful to avoid any allegations & only report press articles & legal court judgement. To try to avoid bias.
How do wiki admin expose 1912 user & stop their (school/ marketing) manipulation of this wiki page pls?
No rush, I know u busy. Thx for your time. I could do with help from someone as I am really struggling with late diagnosis autism & Long Covid. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eco-climber ( talk • contribs) 07:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair, Thank you so much for helping me become a better contributor. I followed all your rules and deleted a lot of back links to Nvidia's web property, I posted my COI, and found lots of external references. Also made lots of edits to clean up the terrible page I first published! Additionally, I used the following 3 examples of event pages to help guide me, and tried to be even more thorough than the below examples with many external sources from established press outlets: /info/en/?search=Apple_Worldwide_Developers_Conference /info/en/?search=Google_I/O /info/en/?search=Build_(developer_conference) Have a lovely weekend and please let me kno wif you'd like me to take any more action. Kindest MariaPass ( talk) 19:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)-MariaPass
Could you protect this article ? An user who looks like a SPA, a U2 fan, is doing some positive bias, refusing to include how badly treated the Pixies were as opening band during this 1992 U2 tour. Meanwhile this user thinks it is more worthwhile to include that Spin's journalist was Kim Deal's boyfriend, which looks like an attempt to discredit his work. This Pixies section is oriented in a certain way. Positive bias is a plague on wikipedia. Woovee ( talk) 22:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:COMP § Nvidia GC. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User talk:Eyasinarafat.official requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — DaxServer ( talk) 10:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dantearthurs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
Good afternoon sir! I have a question for you. I am a paid editor for the Saugus X Entertainment company and my job is to write for the films and artists in the community. I was told that the page, "DJX Kbrokaysen" was banned for sockpoppeting and we cannot seem to create a page for this person. My question for you is are we able to create a page for this person or are we no longer allowed to do this? My name is Shane by the way, I am the information and promotion guy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaugusXEntertainment ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:13SEAN VINCENT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:BrendenAbbott mugshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cminogue1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Leslie Camilleri.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lloyd Crosbie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MargaretMaher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MersinaHalvagis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:NicolePatterson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Peternorrisdupas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 20:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for the block there. You might be interested to know that there was some article hijacking going on there! Graham 87 16:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022! | |
Hello Longhair, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2022. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. / Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for stopping by my page to welcome me to the community, I really appreciate the recognition from a member as senior as you!
RocketsFallOnRocketFalls (
talk) 22:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bad boy bubby.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
indeed you are, your presence and the lack of it at times remains mysterious - trust it is as they say all good JarrahTree 07:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
oversight
will be renamed suppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for
technical reasons. You can comment
in Phabricator if you have objections.Template:WikiProject Tasmania/SimilarWikiProjects has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 20:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
hope its fun and not trauma - look forward to seeing you back sometime... JarrahTree 04:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
deletelogentry
and deletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the
Researcher user group and
Checkusers who are not administrators can now access
Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (
T301928)The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello I have removed you from the subscription list of Wikipedia:Administrators' newsletter/Subscribe since you have opted-out of message delivery. Terasail [✉️] 12:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Duck Ponds and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 26#Duck Ponds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 ( talk) 07:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Surf beach and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 26#Surf beach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 ( talk) 09:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Leonard Leonardotypical ( talk) 04:55, 22 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, is there any chance for undeleting the draft article about Dolaana Khovalyg? Thanks! Best, Quaenuncabibis ( talk) 07:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:John Wren 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
The file File:WelcomeToWoopWoppSoundtrackCover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Welcome to Woop Woop#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 00:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mildura Rural City logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 18:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 11:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Longhair: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, TheSandDoctor Talk 18:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
From my family to yours: Merry Christmas! TheSandDoctor Talk 18:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 01:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockhampton Correctional Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
JMWt ( talk) 08:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
The file File:NWIRUncookYourself.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free book cover being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in Nat's What I Reckon#History which fails WP:NFCC#8. Non-free book cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about book, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular book cover anywhere in the article, and thus no justification for the file's non-free use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 07:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Black coal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 9 § Black coal until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Template:WP Australia subproject assessment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 09:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Serial killers by nationality has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Panamitsu (talk) Please ping on reply 03:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Julie McGregor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Longhair,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk) 14:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe ( talk) 14:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The redirect The Best Christmas Ever(That '70s Show episode) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § The Best Christmas Ever(That '70s Show episode) until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Rags to Riches (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
fails WP:GNG, I was unable to find any coverage in reliable sources demonstrating notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Waxworker (
talk) 16:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Australian cricketers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. -- TheImaCow ( talk) 16:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhett Walton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Boleyn ( talk) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Australian Family Association logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. Longhair has not edited Wikipedia since December 6, 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
Apologies for leaving a message here as well as on my talk page, but I'm not sure whether you also watch talk pages of IP addresses after leaving a message there. I noticed that you reverted my edit to 2020 in arthropod paleontology, but in a message you only mentioned that it appearing unconstructive, and it's not clear to me what it was exactly that caused the revert. Regards-- 188.147.32.84 ( talk) 21:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
So I noticed that one of the things that can get a Wikipedia page taken down is if it's not "notable". My anarchy server will never be as big as something like 2b2t or hypixel, but would it be okay to use Wikipedia as a base, so that It can grow as my server gets more popular? I am completely new to making content on Wikipedia, i didn't even know there was an article wizard that's how little I know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DraconicPiggy ( talk • contribs)
Hello, Longhair,
Looks like this page might need to be protected. I saw on the Deletion log that you recently deleted it but it's been recreated. Liz Read! Talk! 00:07, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
I added a section to Brusatte's bio about his work on Jurassic World: Dominion, saying that he had been involved in the introduction of feathered dinosaurs to the film franchise. The source was a tweet he made. I understand that Twitter is Twitter, but it is coming directly from Brusatte, so it's essentially a primary source. I figured that statements made by public figures about themselves, regardless of platform, were acceptable citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue Monkeys from Outer Space ( talk • contribs)
I opened a SPI report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CONSURE MEDICALS PVT LTD for two accounts which you already blocked. The user has freely admitted creating multiple accounts using at least seven different email addresses, and is doing so for the purposes of undisclosed paid editing. -- Drm310 🍁 ( talk) 14:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
how tf did you find that, seriously 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
I even put spaces and switched words around 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
to be clear i'll easily come back on another account, but i don't know how you are "busy in real life" and find stuff like that 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hey, this is my first article I am publishing and want to figure why the last was deleted. Don't want to be breaking rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Corai Quinn ( talk • contribs)
Hello, I have no idea why this happened, the notification was sent out using Twinkle and it somehow replaced your block message. My apologies, and thank you for the block. -- Ashley yoursmile! 06:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
how tf did you find that, seriously 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
I even put spaces and switched words around 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
to be clear i'll easily come back on another account, but i don't know how you are "busy in real life" and find stuff like that 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 01:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
So do you watch IronManCap's page or what 92.4.79.94 ( talk) 15:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi you delete this page https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:New_user_landing_page&page=Hooman+Saffari but everything is was right you can check it by yourself on imdb https://www.imdb.com/name/nm12538758/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoomansf ( talk • contribs) 16:19, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Could you revdel the edits and edit summaries of this IP? It's WP:LTA/GRP or copycat, and the edits contain links to attack sites run by GRP containing highly abusive libel aimed at several admins and other users. Such links have usually been revdelled, such as on my talk page. Thank you. Java Hurricane 04:36, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
Hi Longhair,
I wrote an article earlier this year that was review and edits were suggested. Today I made those edits but now the article was deleted due to principle (don't write articles about yourself). I am under the impression that it's quite normal that artists contribute to wikipedia themselves. Some of my works are difficult to find and people often refer to the missing wiki page were such information may be found. As a professor I find students are similarly asking about my presence on wikipedia. I could hire or ask someone else to write the article but that appears to be a bit silly to me. Have you reviewed my latest edits? If so, what in your mind is still missing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenrikAlbert ( talk • contribs)
Going through CAT:UNBLOCK again. I agree with this block, it seems reasonable.
The response from the editor seems promising. They have chosen an appropriate name, they say their previous name was from a defunct software company.
They claim they are just a fan of the radio station and that they based the format on the article Zenith Classic Rock which seems consistent.
I have pointed out to them the COI, SPAM, and NOTABILITY policies. I have pointed out that their radio station probably does not meet our notability requirements. I have asked them where they do intend to edit if unblocked.
Assuming their responses to these concerns are reasonable and I keep an eye on them after, how do you feel about me unblocking? Also please let me know if you have any other concerns to add. Thank you. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair, this ip is a sockpuppet of Walter Ezequiel Matthysse Jr., globally banned by autobiographical spam. Regards Valdemar2018 ( talk) 10:27, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Longhair,
Thank you for your messages. I appreciate the information and direction.
I am new to Wikipedia (editing) and certainly wish to comply.
I am new to Northpoint, and I noticed errors or things which could have been stated better or differently. Thus, I entered corrections. If I have erred, my apologies, and I will do what is needed to correct.
Any guidance you have would be appreciated, and if I have missed something, I certainly wish to correct that as well. Thank you, TH — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrThomasHarrison ( talk • contribs) 22:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Well, good to hearing from you. I messaging you regarding the reverted page which i contributed. I have read through wikipedia guide and I always ensure to follow their guide before supply any information. Hence, I updated a link and it was reverted by you because you saw it as spam but well, any resource I supply, it was related to the topic of discussion, as such to encourage us for continuous updating of wikipedia, our effort should always be considered as our mission is to keep wikipedia legacy going.
Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frediemie ( talk • contribs)
Dear Longhair, the links to external pages you deleted were in fact not in accordance with Wikipedia standards, once they were the body of the article. But they are important information for ISAT users since there few known open source implementations. Implement ISAT is a non-trivial task, allow the readers to know about the existing codes is important. In this sense, I will again include the links in the article, but this time in the external references section.
Thank you for monitoring the Leigh Harris wikipedia page. Her husband Rick Ledbetter is using it for self promotion. He delved into recordings she forbid him to touch when she was alive, and "remastered" them, at times with disastrous results. He is marketing them on her Bandcamp page and has arranged that he reap with money generated from sales. He is fully aware this was against her wishes and was only able to do this after her death.
The CD "Home" was released in 2007 not 2018. What was released in 2018 was his remaster of the original. That date needs correcting.
Deevaleigh (
talk) 21:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)deevaleigh
Please note: New revisions by user 2600:6C40:5800:1298:19B8:E19E:894F:6A0A2600:6C40:5800:1298:19B8:E19E:894F:6A0A made 29 August from a mobile device are reverting to content from edits made 14 July 2021 at 2:13. Back Door Blues Revue was an after hours “Open Mic” style jam with musicians dropping in after their gigs. Leigh Harris, among other musicians, sat in a few times. It was not a band she “fronted” New edits violate COI, lack neutral POV, has ongoing paid editor issues, lacks objectivity/encyclopedic tone, and is promotional. Based on former revisions, new editor possibly a sock puppet. As Leigh Harris is deceased and no longer contributing musical works, her legacy is complete. Would it be feasible to remove the aforementioned violations and then lock the page? Deevaleigh ( talk) 17:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Deevaleigh
The wording was extremely biased and inaccurate, the wording was fixed to be more neutral and accurate, less biased and inflamatory. If you are opposed to accuracy, professionalism and neutrality, you are demeaning your own credibility. There's no 'source' needed to reword "attack" to "protest", when there was no attack, and it was merely a protest, contrary to the hyperbole and hysteria being pushed by one side, the same side that calls domestic terrorist attacks, 'peaceful protests' by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.5.135 ( talk • contribs)
Can you please revert back to this version. This should not be added until the RfC request about such addition is completed. Thank you. Davide King ( talk) 21:44, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for telling me, that you have removed that external link. but this link might be helpful for those people who are seeking for Jobs in India. We at DailySarkariResults.com provides job information (several types of govt jobs) at one place. we collect all the job information from interenet resources, news, employment News and many other places and put the correct information on this website. So in my opinion, please add this url DailySarkariResults.Com in a reference lists.
Hope, you understand.
thanks & Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anilvermait01 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for your reason to revert my edit at River Valley High School. I am thinking of including it in List of major crimes in Singapore (2000–present) since it is now confirmed to be a student killing his classmate NelsonLee20042020 ( talk) 07:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Edit war I am not intending.
I have used the talk page. I have added international sources from several countries. I have made modifications. Yet the other guy just blanks out the entire section. His/her reasoning is very odd. He/she makes up things that is not wikipedia policy, like saying that only when there is negligence on the part of the school can it be in an article. Please help. Are you an admin? Charliestalnaker ( talk) 05:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
To me the idea that NOTNEWS applies to what may potentially be the first case of domestic terrorism (or at least the first case of somebody getting killed) in a Singaporean school is rather goofy. Separate arguments raised elsewhere, like the event is not notable in itself because only one victim died, instead of many ala a typical US school shooting, sound absurd and callous. I wonder if you have any thoughts regarding this. Kingoflettuce ( talk) 07:30, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Please re-read the very earnest and well-meaning userpage again. That user did not state that 3 people were sharing the account, the user disclosed that "any new pages created" would represent joint work by a team of three people. The appropriate response here would be to advise them that this is not acceptable under Wikipedia rules, rather than to issue an indefinite block as if the person were some LTA. See also WP:BITE.
I have no COI and no relation to the APS other than that several articles on my watchlist are for scholars who are members there, so that I noticed a sudden pattern on my watchlist due to multiple reversions of the useful information about their memberships. E.g. [1] [2] etc. HouseOfChange ( talk) 11:45, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent contribution and revision on the page with reference to this user, I10love9kangaroos84.
It should be noted that users 203.220.186.201 and Nospamalot, who made edits to the page, are very likely the same person. This person is a known political opponent of the subject, who commenced editing the page on 14 July, making many more edits from 19-20 July. This person has no intention to constructively contribute to the page, only to frame the subject in a negative light in an attempt to discredit the subject, vandalise the page and advantage their own political agenda.
With respect to the edit under discussion, as re-added to the page, this was originally added by Nospamalot (2 contributions overall) with a comment: "Was alerted to the whitewashing of this page...[the subject was] a colourful member of the government from 2016-19 who featured prominently in the media across a number of high-profile events, which seem to have been removed from this page. Added with full citations from credible news sources"
There has been no "whitewashing" of the page with respect to the new content added by Nospamalot. The "high-profile" events referred to as having been "removed from this page" were never removed from the page as they were never on there to begin with (as evidenced throughout the pages edit history). These are totally new additions to the page added only by Nospamalot, the content of which has never been on the page before now.
In terms of the content, while Nospamalot has provided "sources", the content either is defamatory, inaccurate, does not present a full picture or attempts to frame the subject in a negative light via 'guilt by association' for matters outside of the control of the subject.
With respect to the first removal via this userpage, I10love9kangaroos84, the comment added was: "These changes are an attempt at harassment of the subject and page vandalism by subject opponents based on incomplete or incorrect information. For example, it must be noted that the original reporting regarding Gretals was incorrect in that Gretals had not received a Commonwealth grant at the time...[the subject] invested. While...[the subject] had mentioned this company being the successful recipient of a grant in Parliament, Gretals had later rejected that grant prior to...[the subject's] SMSF investing in it."
When Nospamalot then readded the content, the comments again removing this content noted the defamatory and incorrect nature of the content by utilising the tags " Hello, I'm I10love9kangaroos84. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hello, I'm I10love9kangaroos84. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hello, I'm I10love9kangaroos84. Your recent edit(s) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hello, I'm I10love9kangaroos84. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. "
The first allegation at hand in Nospamalot's content was that the subject's self-managed superannuation fund had invested in a company with less than 25 shareholders that had allegedly received a government grant, creating an alleged constitutional issue. This was later totally discredited given that Gretals had actually rejected the grant before the time the subject's superannuation fund invested in them, meaning the original media reports relying on a speech to Parliament were also incorrect. This was confirmed via both statements in online media articles from Gretals ("Gretals “did not proceed” with projects that were to be financed through the global connections fund. “We never received funding,” he said), as well as legal advice from David Bennett QC putting the subject totally in the clear and discrediting his political opposition's claims. It should be noted that the subject considered commencing defamation proceedings against the original media sources who printed the later discredited information, but determined not to due to the cost and effort involved.
The inclusion of this content on the page by Nospamalot with an early media source, containing later discredited information, is only therefore intended to put the subject under a cloud to try to discredit him.
It should also be noted that this statement made by Nospamalot is also unsourced and totally incorrect: "The parliamentary vote to refer...[the subject] to the High Court was defeated and...[the subject] continued to serve as Member...and contested the 2019 federal election." There was no vote to refer the subject to the High Court after the above information discrediting the original claims came out, so this statement by Nospamalot is also incorrect.
The second allegation at hand in Nospamalot's content relates to environmental grants. While the Facebook posts and media release themselves were clumsily worded (as explained by the subject at the time), in the actual video announcements within those same original Facebook posts the then Minister for the Environment and the subject made it quite clear to local organisations (being organisations who had submitted EOIs for the program) that those would be environmental projects that would be nominated under the environmental grants program only once it formally opened, with funding to flow if both the subject and the government were re-elected. Again, this was an issue brought up by the subject's opponents that was discontinued by them upon them getting no traction.
The third allegation at hand in Nospamalot's content relates to government decisions and actions beyond the subject's direct control, again though attempting to put the subject 'under a cloud' to discredit him. Firstly, it is true that the subject joined the Treasurer to announce funding for commuter car parks prior to the previous election. Nospamalot is incorrect though in stating that "these plans were scrapped in 2021". The State Government in 2021 rejected building the car parking on their land, but the funding itself is not lost. The Federal Government has instead been actively working with the Local Government to build these car parks on local government land instead, with discussions ongoing. The remainder of Nospamalot's commentary then does not relate to the subject. The subject was not involved in the administration of the programme, nor in determining which commuter car parks would be chosen to be funded through the program. This was done at the ministerial/executive/departmental level. While media concerns have been raised recently about the Federal Government's administration of this program, this does not relate directly to the subject. Thus, this is yet another attempt by Nospamalot to embroil the subject by attempting to discredit him and 'put him under a cloud' of guilt by association.
In summary, please respectively consider removing this recently added (and re-added) section written and added by 'Nospamalot' from the subject's Wikipedia page, particularly given it contains discredited, defamatory and incorrect information. Please also keep an eye on the page to prevent this vandalism of the page occurring, which as mentioned is being done only to frame the subject in a negative light in an attempt to discredit the subject, vandalise the page and advantage Nospamalot's own political agenda.
It must be noted that, while this page has existed for years, the last week is the first time that serious attempted vandalism of the page, for a political agenda, has occurred.
Thank you very much for your time looking into this matter.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Not sure how to reply as a sub-comment to your reply, so apologies for the separate post.
Re your reply, so what is the solution?
It should be noted that as soon as your warning/comments were seen, this user I10love9kangaroos84 has made no further undo or changes to the page. And you mentioned on the I10love9kangaroos84 talk page that "If you think I made a mistake" to go directly to you, which has been done.
Currently, Nospamalot is being allowed to put up commentary (including inaccurate and irrelevant information) to deliberately discredit and frame the subject in a negative light for political purposes, which as noted in the previous comment on this talk page also includes unsourced and incorrect information: e.g. "The parliamentary vote to refer...[the subject] to the High Court was defeated and...[the subject] continued to serve...and contested the 2019 federal election." where no such vote ever occurred.
You've also acknowledged this as being sockpuppet activity.
If any attempts are made to even edit or clarify this information added by Nospamalot (then re-added by yourself), then you've indicated that further page changes may be blocked. This then allows for this information without changes or clarification to continue on the page.
It should, separately, be noted that 203.220.186.201 removed multiple sets of fully sourced and cited information without any ramifications. But in this case where information was removed written by Nospamalot that selectively used sources, in the situation that Nospamalot was trying to frame the subject in a negative manner for political purposes, action was taken to restore this content (in favour of Nospamalot).
It would be therefore asked that this section, which is damaging to the subject and incorrect in many regards, be removed by you as an Administrator until a conversation, say over a talk page, can be held regarding this content.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 01:38, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Your looking in-depth into this matter is much appreciated.
And, apologies, as your comment "The article will likely be protected from editing until a consensus is reached on the content if the behaviour that has occurred until now is going to be the way forward" had been taken to mean further edits of that section added by Nospamalot might be taken as an edit war resulting in protection of that section for editing, and thus incorrect, unsourced, and/or incomplete (aka 'framing') information then remaining.
Also, apologies for using the word "acknowledgement", noting you have said that "I suspected sockpuppet activity; I didn't acknowledge it".
For context, in this case, edits of this page commenced on 14 July 2021 from 203.220.186.201. Changes made included reframing previously neutral sentences such as "serving as its Federal Member of Parliament from 2016-19." to instead read "and serving until his defeat at the 2019 Federal Election.", as well as other changes such as adding that the subject had been unsuccessful in a recent preselection.
It should be noted that this person is a known political opponent of the subject, identified based on their previous edits using the same IP address. The context is that the subject came second in a preselection on 10 July 2021, so this political opponent has attempted to alter the page to undermine and discredit the subject to reduce the chance of them re-emerging as a political candidate in the future, which also though has an impact on the subject's current employment prospects.
After these changes were made, further changes to the page were made to re-assert neutrality and to make other updates. It effectively has snowballed from there, with further changes made by 203.220.186.201 that became increasingly more malicious as edits and corrections were made. 203.220.186.201 also made edits to other pages edited by 123.208.64.237, such as edits to /info/en/?search=Modern_Slavery_Act_2015 by going through publicly available edits previously made under IP address 123.208.64.237.
Edits back and forth have currently reached close to neutrality on these other sections though.
However, this has then snowballed further and led to the recent section being added by Nospamalot (aka 202.220.186.201) which is much more malicious in targeting the subject to try discredit them, including using both unsourced information and sourced information without full context to try 'frame' the subject in a negative light (information which was later was discredited by other sourced information as previously explained to you).
This more malicious section was also added with an accompanying dishonest edit, where Nospamalot states that the subject "...featured prominently in the media across a number of high-profile events, which seem to have been removed from this page." noting that all this information added by Nospamalot was new to the page and had never been previously removed (as evidenced by the page's edit history).
Surely Wikipedia pages should not be able to be misused by political opponents in attempts to discredit political (or ex-political) subjects and to advantage themselves politically? These malicious edits should be deemed as vandalism and non-neutral edits, and thus disallowed.
If this section is removed, the page would be pretty much neutral in its current form otherwise.
Noted also upon almost completing this reply to you is your referral of the page to the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons noticeboard. That is appreciated. Adding to that, given your involvement in this matter, your direct looking at the history of the edits would be much appreciated when you have time, given you are busy offline currently.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 04:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
As requested, the usernames/IP addresses that are editing the same (being extremely likely the same person) are 203.220.186.201 (a known political opponent of the subject) and username Nospamalot. On the current version of the Wikipedia page, while there are parts that could do with some minor work, this section is the major problematic one that is not neutral. If that section were to be removed, and taken to a talk page discussion, that would provide some way forward for editors to discuss without article disruption as a possible way forward.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 06:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi LongHair, I respecfully urge you to publish the biography as it is not mine. It belongs to person who has done alot for the social welfare and human rights in Pakistan. Please publish — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wsptiofficial ( talk • contribs)
Hi. Thanks for the quick response. He is my mentor, thats why I published it Wajahat178 ( talk) 14:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the quick response. He is my mentor, thats why I published it Wajahat178 ( talk) 14:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Your looking in-depth into this matter is much appreciated.
And, apologies, as your comment "The article will likely be protected from editing until a consensus is reached on the content if the behaviour that has occurred until now is going to be the way forward" had been taken to mean further edits of that section added by Nospamalot might be taken as an edit war resulting in protection of that section for editing, and thus incorrect, unsourced, and/or incomplete (aka 'framing') information then remaining.
Also, apologies for using the word "acknowledgement", noting you have said that "I suspected sockpuppet activity; I didn't acknowledge it".
For context, in this case, edits of this page commenced on 14 July 2021 from 203.220.186.201. Changes made included reframing previously neutral sentences such as "serving as its Federal Member of Parliament from 2016-19." to instead read "and serving until his defeat at the 2019 Federal Election.", as well as other changes such as adding that the subject had been unsuccessful in a recent preselection.
It should be noted that this person is a known political opponent of the subject, identified based on their previous edits using the same IP address. The context is that the subject came second in a preselection on 10 July 2021, so this political opponent has attempted to alter the page to undermine and discredit the subject to reduce the chance of them re-emerging as a political candidate in the future, which also though has an impact on the subject's current employment prospects.
After these changes were made, further changes to the page were made to re-assert neutrality and to make other updates. It effectively has snowballed from there, with further changes made by 203.220.186.201 that became increasingly more malicious as edits and corrections were made. 203.220.186.201 also made edits to other pages edited by 123.208.64.237, such as edits to /info/en/?search=Modern_Slavery_Act_2015 by going through publicly available edits previously made under IP address 123.208.64.237.
Edits back and forth have currently reached close to neutrality on these other sections though.
However, this has then snowballed further and led to the recent section being added by Nospamalot (aka 202.220.186.201) which is much more malicious in targeting the subject to try discredit them, including using both unsourced information and sourced information without full context to try 'frame' the subject in a negative light (information which was later was discredited by other sourced information as previously explained to you).
This more malicious section was also added with an accompanying dishonest edit, where Nospamalot states that the subject "...featured prominently in the media across a number of high-profile events, which seem to have been removed from this page." noting that all this information added by Nospamalot was new to the page and had never been previously removed (as evidenced by the page's edit history).
Surely Wikipedia pages should not be able to be misused by political opponents in attempts to discredit political (or ex-political) subjects and to advantage themselves politically? These malicious edits should be deemed as vandalism and non-neutral edits, and thus disallowed.
If this section is removed, the page would be pretty much neutral in its current form otherwise.
Noted also upon almost completing this reply to you is your referral of the page to the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons noticeboard. That is appreciated. Adding to that, given your involvement in this matter, your direct looking at the history of the edits would be much appreciated when you have time, given you are busy offline currently.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 04:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
As requested, the usernames/IP addresses that are editing the same (being extremely likely the same person) are 203.220.186.201 (a known political opponent of the subject) and username Nospamalot. On the current version of the Wikipedia page, while there are parts that could do with some minor work, this section is the major problematic one that is not neutral. If that section were to be removed, and taken to a talk page discussion, that would provide some way forward for editors to discuss without article disruption as a possible way forward.
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 06:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
I10love9kangaroos84 ( talk) 11:25, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Im unsure why you deleted my link, it wasn't inappropriate, it was definitely within the subject matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.213.21.230 ( talk • contribs)
Hello Longhair. My explanation for my relationship to my Royal Hawaiian Monarchy is not advertising as my family are the Throne but is an introduction to Wikipedia as I see so much wrong history is somehow left on the media and here too but should be added to all valid encyclopedias. HRM Queen Leona Leimomi Perrells ( talk) 08:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
So, the problem is putting copies on my pages here? My family are historic. Please check your sources. I do also have a Royal Guard through the State today. Perhaps you should check with them. I don’t think Wikipedia would like you inhibiting history either. HRM Queen Leona Leimomi Perrells ( talk)
Hello,
I just tried to change coordinates on a lake in France. I cannot find how to properly do coordinates and I deeply apologize for the inconvenience. Could you please help me?
Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by GdeMlzc ( talk • contribs)
Hi
Do you know the full story of his life and what he has done, don’t update his wiki page with only positive comments
Do you know what dirty deeds he has done, just because he produced movies , this person does not deserve a Wikipedia page .
What is his contribution? He has cheated many ppl to produce movies, starting from his gf urf ex wife to all his close friends Don’t be mersmerised by his words — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.192.163 ( talk • contribs)
Hi
There was a recent press conference by Rakshit Shetty on the type of criminal activity he has done, not paying money to daily wage workers in the set- why isn’t this updated
Who is grieving with you
Why have you not mentioned that he has been divorced and the type of harassment he has done to his wife, why ain’t the page is updated with those .
He has cheated and has a case filed in tumkur court for fraud and he has done forgery, get your facts straight and then update his page
YGM JarrahTree 06:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi, is it possible to uncheck the "create talk page" button when blocking accounts with abusive usernames like these? That will deny recognition to these users. aeschylus ( talk) 01:00, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
How can be BabyDogeCoin advertising? All crypto currencies have a own page on wikipedia. Small, and even big crypto. BabyDogeCoin is listed on 20+ big news mainstream.
Put it back please, google yourself on news.google.com 'BabyDogecoin' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moontime777 ( talk • contribs)
Good explained! I took your adivice! I changed it and took me 1 hour to make it clean and neat for readers.
Can u check sir?
Thank you!
Longhair our article in the making has been deleted. Apparantly our account has been blocked due to promotion or advertising. Can you please clarify what we did wrong and how we can solve this issue? Thanks in advance
My name is Ariful Matz and I wish that I need your help to make my personal official wikipedia page. Thanks and Regards Steven Matz ( talk) 07:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Please, leave the critique, it's based on facts and expirience, why would you remove it? New players, if they would like to buy the game must know what they buy before they do it. What's the point in removing the critique? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShadowBoss717 ( talk • contribs)
Hi there
I was creating english version of my guru aripiral viswam, which has already a page in TELUGU
I am not doing anything suspicious or misleading
Kindly revoke the page
https://te.wikipedia.org/wiki/అరిపిరాల_విశ్వం
Is the page , check and respond — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anandaghana ( talk • contribs)
Can i recreate my Page User Id : anandaghana
Wikipedia says ..as it has already deleted the page, content similar to it again if recreated needs to be authorised by the user who deleted it, check and confirm Shri. Long hair
Thanks for blocking User:City_of_Branch. Appreciate you being Administrator. Following the agreed rules, I will be happy to have the user back - editing wikipedia, as the user appears to be very knowledgable about the city and it's surroundings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinecar ( talk • contribs)
I just wanted to say that I'm not sure this user was given a fair evaluation of their unblock request. Though I won't contest your block in any way, I did want to note that I think they may have had a valid unblock request that should've been heard out. Thanks. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲( talk) 23:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Hey Longhair! Can I manually revert British Tiger’s edit which is tagged as ‘use of deprecated (unreliable) source’? As it is tagged that, I do not thing it should stay on the page for very long. Is it ok if I revert it or will I get an edit war warning? KejuFuru ( talk) 03:51, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
I am talking about a recent edit by BritishTiger whose edit was tagged as ‘use of deprecated (unreliable) sources’. The user who got blocked for 48 hrs. Yes, i’ll be careful about the edit summaries, I can understand what you’re saying and thanks a lot for your help and guidance! Don’t worry I’ll explain things properly in the edit summary. KejuFuru ( talk) 06:20, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair, BritishTiger has started doing the same thing again. So many warnings but no learning. He just keeps edit warring and adds deprecated sources without any explanation in the edit summaries, I even told him what not to add to a page by linking https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deprecated_sources in the warning but he is still asking me how his edits are unreliable. This is really frustrating and getting out of my hands so please take some strict actions mate. He is also removing some content without any proper explanation. Please do something… KejuFuru ( talk) 11:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Hey Longhair! I need some help, first answer that can Wiki admins revert those edits which non-admin editors can’t? Can you Wikipedia admins revert the edits which say, “The edit could not be undone due to conflicting intermediate edits; if you wish to undo the change, it must be done manually.” ? KejuFuru ( talk) 07:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
👍 ok KejuFuru ( talk) 10:35, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Ensuring Wikipedia remains good for everyone including two of my sub user pages which have been reverted. Iggy ( Swan) ( Contribs) 11:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC) |
Hi - do you really think that a hard block was necessary for Granite Cove Big Sur? I took a look at the deleted userpage, it looked to me like someone was trying to write an article about an historic building (something I do quite often!), but didn't understand how to go about it. I didn't see anything promotional in the deleted text, maybe I overlooked something though? I just want to be sure we're not biting an innocent newb. Girth Summit (blether) 09:13, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
COI again on Leigh Harris page Deevaleigh ( talk) 16:37, 6 August 2021 (UTC)deevaleigh
Hi there,
I'm not sure how to use this talk thing but here goes!
You sent me an email re some changes I made to the bay 93.9 Wiki page a while ago.
I am not paid for those edits.
I'm not a social media specialist etc...
I'm merely an announcer at the station and thought I was doing my part to keep Wiki up to date as there was quite a bit of old info on the page.
The logo etc is our current logo.
I often look up radio stations on wiki as I work in the business and the bay page was way out of date and lacking up to date information - none of which was intended to be a "commercial"... I merely wanted the page to be correct and up to date.
I apologise if I broke any rules - I had no idea.
Sorry for not answering you back on the "talk page"...I tried to work out how to reply but I had no idea how to do it!
My apologies for not following the rules. It was not intentional and I was not acting on behalf of the company.
I'm not paid to update the page or asked by the company to update the page - I merely thought I was updating a page that was way out of date and was trying to do the right thing.
Kinds Regards,
Vk3crg ( talk) 09:32, 7 August 2021 (UTC) VK3CRG
Ms Harris, as you can read from her wiki page, passed away Sept of 2019. I am her husband and heir of her estate. After she passed, I finished her last CD (Waking up in Dreamland) and released it.
AFTER SHE PASSED, I FOUND A LOST BOX OF HER TAPES THAT RESULTED IN THE RELEASE OF 6 MORE CDS, AND I HAVE PRODUCED AND RELEASED THEM AND LISTED THEM ON HER WIKI PAGE AS A DISCOGRAPHY. FURTHER, I FOUND MORE INFORMATION ABOUT HER PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL HISTORY THAT NEEDS TO BE PUT ON HER WIKI PAGE TO CORRECT AND EXTEND WHAT IS THERE, SO I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU WOULD RESTORE HER PAGE TO THE REV I LAST PUT UP. I HAVE SPENT A LOT OF TIME RESEARCHING HER PROFESSIONAL HISTORY AND I WANT IT TO BE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. AND SOME THINGS THAT WERE INITIALLY PUT ON THE PAGE, LIKE JOHN MEUNIER WAS THE FIRST PERCOLATORS BASS PLAYER, AND THE FACT THAT SHE WAS IN ANOTHER BAND BEFORE THAT BAND, IS INACCURATE. REFERRING TO HER SON AS A'SCRUBOLOGIST' IS UNPROFESSIONAL, AND I WOULD PREFER TO USE TO CAJUN TERM FOR IT AND ADD THAT HE IS A VOCALIST. AND THESE ARE JUST 2 OF SEVERAL CHANGES THAT NEED TO BE REPLACED.
FRANKLY, I WISH I WAS MAKING MONEY FROM HER ESTATE BUT THE REALITY OF IT IS I'M IN THE RED. THE PERSON WHO POSTED THE ALERT - DEEVALEIGH IS A PERSON THAT HAS HAD AN AX TO GRIND EVER SINCE LEIGH GOT SICK WITH CANCER AND I BECAME HER SOLE CAREGIVER. HER STATEMENT TO THE AFFECT OF 'WHAT LEIGH DID NOT WANT" IS LUDICROUS, SINCE (IF IT IS WHO I THINK IT IS, BECAUSE IF THE WAY SHE PHRASED HER COMPLAINT) THIS PERSON DID NOT SEE OR TALK TO LEIGH IN THE LAST YEARS OF HER LIFE AND DIDN'T EVEN BOTHER TO COME TO HER FUNERAL. SHE HAS NO INTEREST WHAT SO EVER, OUTSIDE OF JUST TRYING TO DISRUPT MY EFFORTS TO GET LEIGH THE RECOGNITION SHE NEVER GOT WHILE SHE WAS ALIVE. THE ALLEGATION THAT I AM MAKING MONEY OFF WHAT I INHERITED ARE CRAZY. ALL I AM TRYING TO DO IS TO SECURE HER PLACE IN NEW ORLEANS MUSIC HISTORY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rick Ledbetter ( talk • contribs)
Hi - my article was recently deleted, I was adding a page for a site that was recently referenced. Would it be better if there where not any links to the site? Mainly placed the concept of the website and what information can be found on the website.
Thank you for you help Dtv.nvs ( talk) 01:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair, I notice that your deletion of the banned Egacommissioner's text at Euchre has effectively been reinstated by a newly created account, Slickmanz53. I wonder if that's a sockpuppet account. What do you think? Bermicourt ( talk) 09:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
We have not violated any policy. All the updates made were genuine and 100% correct there is no copy right violation at all. Kindly restore our page content & permit the last changes made thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BMSkendra ( talk • contribs)
Hi Longhair,
Could you give me some guidance on an article you tagged for speedy deletion?
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Property Financial ( talk • contribs)
Hello, I'm Longhair. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Alejandroeflores have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Longhair\talk 02:02, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Alejandro Evangelista Flores Sr./sandbox. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Longhair\talk 06:49, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Response: Please I would like to return back my Draft in the Sandbox Area to edit my mistake.I would like to know exact words from my draft that is forbidden.Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alejandro Evangelista Flores Sr. ( talk • contribs)
I have used all the reliable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lourenspoorter ( talk • contribs)
Hey, I've had a bunch of issues with new articles tagged by clueless newbie reviewers who have no clue what they're doing lately, so it seems I'm not autopatrolled?!? Is that something you can fix? The Drover's Wife ( talk) 13:42, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Why are you deleting an article that I've been working hard on and is based on fact.
I'm simply trying to make people aware of a topic that's not very well known on most of the internet but is something significant and interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phexcord Cult Member ( talk • contribs)
Nice one :). Learn something new every day off it, things I'd never known :) (although today is somewhat an exception because had to learn the first one some time back but never had known about the tragic incident near Alice) SHB2000 ( talk) 01:53, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
i do not know who you are. I do not know what you are insinuating nor have i been paid for any Wikipedia work.
Please do not contact me again. Shawn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShawnPiqueManagement ( talk • contribs)
It is unrepentant - and relentless - I do hope you might see to implement something or other, but as always, up to you... JarrahTree 09:11, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello There. I am trying to create a page for a UAE businessman. I have cited all references and local new articles I found about him. I would like your feedback on the page and if there is anything that needs attention. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greeshmagshetty ( talk • contribs)
Hello Longhair, I’m writing to you in your role as an administrator, hoping you can give me some advice.
I am aware of a Wikipedia user who has recently deleted all of his talk page apart from the welcome message he received 10 years ago (97,000 characters were deleted). My understanding is that this should not happen. WP:UP#DELTALK states that “User talk pages… are generally not deleted; they are usually needed for reference by other users …” I totally agree with this. I had a protracted dialogue with this particular person after he had reverted an image size and caption in one of my edits, an action that I considered to be unreasonable. In the end he backed down, but it is important this conversation and others that were on his talk page should be available for other people to read. In addition to his exchange of views with me, there were plenty of other discussions on this person’s talk page, many of them relating to disputes.
So my question is: Is there a place I can formally report that this person has deleted most of his talk page? I looked at WP:RAA, but nothing seems to fit because this is not a dispute, nor do I want this person blocked. I just want the statement in WP:UP#DELTALK to apply. If he has a good reason for deleting all this content, surely he should be required to state what it is. You can easily identify the person I’m referring to if you go to my talk page and check out No. 5 “Images sizes & captions”. Ikeshut2 ( talk) 04:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Looks like Fuerdai's gone into image related vandalism. [6] as well as module vandalism [7]... SHB2000 ( talk) 12:45, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair. After my recent (21 August) ANI report you blocked this user for 31 hours. Seems they have just resorted back to the same ways: unsourced genre additions. Could I trouble you to cast an eye please. Cheers. Rob van vee 05:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
You have tagged my page as COI. I did make changes to my own page and I'm sorry I did not know to put them in talk first. However, the changes were updates with good sources. Basically I wanted to foreground my more recent book (published in 2019) instead of the longer-ago book (2009).
Please advise me how the warnings can be removed from the page and what information, if any, is actually is in violation of wikipedia practices.
Carol Sklenicka — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csklenicka ( talk • contribs)
Hello Longhair. Regarding your (now removed) response on
WP:UAA. Could you please provide the OTRS ticket where the user has proven their identity? If one does not exist, are you in the process of guiding the user to prove their identity?
If neither one of those seems to be the case, I'd like to ask you to reconsider your actions as, generally speaking, real world names belonging to identifiable individuals are usually blocked until they either a) change the username or b) prove their identity, per
WP:REALNAME. Thanks.
Melmann 19:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair,
I was just applying some edits to the sandbox page of Zoetalexandra about 'Bali: Island of the Dogs' when the sandbox was deleted. The edits I was applying were of constructive nature, citing additional sources. <ref> https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2056526/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0 <ref>
I was also removing sections that may seem self promotional and adding information about the content.
Then I was about to answer the reasons why it should not be deleted, when it was deleted. Those reasons include the fact that this is the first film made to point out the scientific importance to these breeds of dogs to the understanding of animal genetics and history.
The author of the sandbox (Zoetalexandra) is not mentioned on the page she wrote, so I don't believe it's self-promotion there.
I'm hoping you can restore the page to the sandbox, and give us another chance to bring it into compliance with the rules.
Many thanks, Deanstormbird Stormbird ( talk) 09:46, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, you recently deleted my article on a film called Bali: Island of the Dogs saying it was self promotion but I did not receive any money for the article or the film and I fail to see where the conflict of interest is. I happen to love to the film that I saw in Bali and went to look up more information about the film on Wikipedia but couldn't find anything so with the help of the IMDB I wrote the article. Apologies for not sourcing IMDB seeing as this is my first time writing an article for Wikipedia and I will quote sources from now on. Please can you tell me where the conflict is and why you "swiftly" deleted my page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoetalexandra ( talk • contribs)
Hello,
/info/en/?search=Daniel_Dubois_(boxer)
This page, fight number 18 was a TKO and not a KO. I was editing/fixing the vandalism when you locked it down.
Just wanted to let you know as I no longer have edit access. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rattt89 ( talk • contribs)
Hello, you just deleted my contribution to the article: Parliament.
The contribution I made was not a advertisement - I'm creating a new article named "Public Parliaments" which could be the displayed in the article "Parliament".
My question, because I'm a begginner: Did you also deleted my "sandbox"? I can not find the content I published...
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samostvoj ( talk • contribs)
the source I used https://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/printable%20Matt%20FAQs.pdf
I wasn't sure how to add it. Also, I own a house in engelhard. some of the information I would want to add for engelhard comes from first-person familiarity with the town — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Engelhard ( talk • contribs)
I have tried before to respond. I am not paid to edit and I did edit my page, for which I apologized. I did not create the page and was doing minor edits to update it. Now it looks like someone wants to delete the page. I agree with the person who argues it should not be deleted. I am a writer of national and international reputation for my biographies of Raymond Carver and Alice Adams. My biography of Raymond Carver has been translated into six languages (2 versions of Chinese) and there is a tv show in the works about Alice Adams partially based on my biography of her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csklenicka ( talk • contribs)
Thank you so much for reverting and protecting many of the Springfield firearm pages. I've been compulsively editing them for over 4 months now and I was wondering if it'll ever end. If you can also undo my edits and protect the remaining Springfield gun pages that'll be great. If possible maybe revert them back to before April 2021 and also protect the pages indefinitely so something like this may not happen again. Thank you so much again I really appreciate it. SpringfieldRedemption ( talk) 20:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
1. Springfield Musket [8] 2. Springfield Model 1812 [9] 3. Springfield Model 1835 [10] 4. Springfield Model 1842 [11] 5. Springfield Model 1863 [12] 6. Springfield Model 1866 [13] 7. Springfield Model 1868 [14] 8. Springfield Model 1869 [15] 9. Springfield Model 1870 Navy [16] 10. Springfield Model 1871 [17] 11. Springfield Model 1873 [18] 12. Springfield Model 1877 [19] 13. Springfield Model 1888 [20] 14. Springfield Model 1892 [21] 15. Springfield Rifle [22]
Hello Longhair,
The information is outdated on the original page and it is just an update with the name of the new principal as well as hyperlinking all sources. I am not a staff nor a paid editor of St. Louis School. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179ThirdStreet ( talk • contribs)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
(still in effect) was perhaps a factor in this post. (I'm inclined to think that the whole thing is a CIR matter.) -- Hoary ( talk) 22:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
I so appreciate your help on this. I don't know how to answer people directly on FB -- and I really don't understand it very well. You summed up my answer succinctly and with respect and I am grateful.
All best to you --
Tim
How DOES one write directly to somebody who asks a question? I'm a journalist and I consider it my moral duty to try to answer questions from people who seem interested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimPageWriter ( talk • contribs)
Just read your message, thank you for the feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EyesInTheSky777 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for undoing the edit someone made to my talk page in which they added the {{deceased}} template to the top of it. As you can see I am definitely not dead yet. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor ( talk) ( Stupidity by me) 13:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Danny Malin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Can you extend protection for at least a month please. Ten days is not very long. Govvy ( talk) 11:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Why the 3 reverts tonight on the school page pls? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eco-climber ( talk • contribs)
Hello Longhair, apologies for leaving a note on your Talk Page, but you did not respond to the comment I left beneath yours on my Talk Page on August 2nd, so I was unsure if you saw it.
You reversed my edit under the 'In Popular Culture' subheading of Karla Homolka's wiki page; I had corrected the 'his relationship' part of 'Lynda Véronneau together with writer Christiane Desjardins, wrote Lynda Véronneau: Dans L'Ombre de Karla, on the topic of his relationship with Homolka while in prison, published in 2005 by Les Éditions Voix Parallèles.' to 'her relationship' as Lynda Véronneau is a woman, not a man. Thank you. RaccoonCityPoliceDepartment ( talk) 20:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC) RaccoonCityPoliceDepartment
Hi, Longhair. You have create-protected DJ Lector, because it has been repeatedly recreated following deletion at AfD. Would you be willing to consider lifting the protection? I had deliberately decided not to protect it, because doing so might be likely to simply result in its being recreated under a different title, where it might escape attention, whereas it is easy to watch for re-creation under the old title. That decision did, in fact, pay off, because it was indeed re-created under the same title, by a different account that I didn't know about. (It seems that account was the original one, and the account which had previously created the article a sockpuppet.) If the title had already been salted at that time I would not have known about it, and so it might well have escaped deletion, and the sockpuppeteer escaped blocking. JBW ( talk) 21:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Special:Contributions/Brandon2345
all the mor einteresting reflection is that no one else has gone there...
think maybe time for restorative turn off time.. JarrahTree 13:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
I wanted to express my personal appreciation for your expression of trust and support in my July RfA. My first few months have not been especially productive, but I did actually stand at the precipice of the edit window of the main page and not delete it. So I guess we'll be okay. If you see me act the fool or otherwise need my attention feel invited to call on me. BusterD ( talk) 17:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Longhair.
I just received your message about the COI about the creation of the page " Liam Cole ". I understand the policies, and yes I'm the artists' project manager, but nothing on the text is self-promoting but only stating some accomplishments and information about an artist that's signed to multiple major labels and worked with renowned artists but doesn't have a page on Wikipedia. Could you please explain how we could go about stating this information about the artist?
Thanks in advance, — Preceding unsigned comment added by LiamColeMusic ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for deleting User:Rupaa02. Two other users were created at the same time and posted the same Tamil language information about herbal drugs on their user page. Those tagged pages, yet to be deleted, are User:Muthuveni .M0812 and User:Rithika02. It's maybe not sockpuppetry to evade blocks, but it's definitely not regular user behaviour. 10mmsocket ( talk) 07:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Could you reprotect Bauhaus (band)? The RFC is not closed yet and has not been responded to and no consensus has yet been reached. Lynchenberg ( talk) 08:14, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Longhair, you removed an external link by mistake or misunderstanding. I fully read (and thought understood) the guidelines. The site I linked to is dedicated to the Whitcombe surname and includes several notables such as Andrea Whitcombe - an ex Olympian and World Champion. Please could you be specific why this site should not be linked, or re-instate it. Thanks. -- Adrianwhitcombe ( talk) 09:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
The No Spam Barnstar | |
For your exceptional service at blocking spam accounts reported to UAA. Helen( 💬 📖) 19:04, 23 September 2021 (UTC) |
Please delete these 2 redirect userpages User:Pakialamerozz and User:Pakialamerzz, those userpages are redirected to my userpage. Can you delete that. Thanks. clipred ( talk) 09:20, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
u are very good moderator 👍👍 Citycountryball2000 ( talk) 18:59, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello Longhair,
Thank you so much for leaving me feedback. I really appreciate it. As you can tell, I am totally new to Wikipedia contribution.
Some information about myself as the article author and what I am aiming to record:
{{
connected contributor (paid)}}
at the top of the page, filling it in, and saving as directed (
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#How_to_disclose_a_COI)/info/en/?search=Conference_on_Neural_Information_Processing_Systems /info/en/?search=Professional_Developers_Conference /info/en/?search=Build_(developer_conference)
I look forward to hearing from you and I so appreciate your guidance. Kindest MariaPass ( talk) 19:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)MariaPass
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
Interface administrator changes
|
So, who is that person, and what is wrong with them? Drmies ( talk) 00:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! You put a COI tag on Steven Hassan recently. It was not clear which editor(s) you were referring to with a COI. I was going to go through and review edits and see if I could clean it up. I am assuming this user: [23] Just wanted to see if there was more. Thanks! — Charles Edward ( Talk | Contribs) 18:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
didnt get back re the staff list query - nope - think it is opportunistic reversion... JarrahTree 01:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for blocking. Very likely that Personnnnnnnn1 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is the exact same person - identical edits to user talk page and a spam draft. 10mmsocket ( talk) 07:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
@ Longhair: I have come to you to ask for the right of IP free blocking, in fact I use public networks such as Broadband, Cafe and WIFI on the English Wikipedia, this IP is currently blocked for about 1 year by Gram87 At this time a call has been made for my mobile, you know that the IP address of the mobile is always changing, if you give this right to me, then I will never mind editing if the IP is blocked.Best Regards. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 07:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello I left a message on my talk page, not sure if you would prefer to talk here. Thanks HollyMM ( talk) 17:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Mate,
Thanks for helping me, I am sure you would have found it rightful to do. I know that she has been inspiring many such sociopreneurs so I added it.
Thank you once again, see you around the Wiki World! — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianVenture ( talk • contribs) 18:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
I made changes to update my page. Please restore them.
I have had a gender change and am now Eaton Hamilton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.108.178 ( talk) 05:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair. Thx 4 help b4. I am autistic & don’t know what to do about the Bromsgrove School page.
User 1912 who also edits the school results, school fees & school very specific & unique info, so I suspect is actually an account linked to the school.
They have taken down the sexual abuse section I added under the existing school abuse section. ( one of the abuses was after a marriage to an ex-pupil be a senior staff member, who then went on to sleep with other pupils). That person was sent to prison.
It’s far, far from the only case at this school of abuse. It’s in the public interest that this data is recorded on the school Wiki, as they are Clear, Important, referenced independently based facts.
This wiki should not be a public school advert page & there again not an anti school hate page either. I was trying to be (successfully?) very careful to avoid any allegations & only report press articles & legal court judgement. To try to avoid bias.
How do wiki admin expose 1912 user & stop their (school/ marketing) manipulation of this wiki page pls?
No rush, I know u busy. Thx for your time. I could do with help from someone as I am really struggling with late diagnosis autism & Long Covid. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eco-climber ( talk • contribs) 07:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi Longhair, Thank you so much for helping me become a better contributor. I followed all your rules and deleted a lot of back links to Nvidia's web property, I posted my COI, and found lots of external references. Also made lots of edits to clean up the terrible page I first published! Additionally, I used the following 3 examples of event pages to help guide me, and tried to be even more thorough than the below examples with many external sources from established press outlets: /info/en/?search=Apple_Worldwide_Developers_Conference /info/en/?search=Google_I/O /info/en/?search=Build_(developer_conference) Have a lovely weekend and please let me kno wif you'd like me to take any more action. Kindest MariaPass ( talk) 19:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)-MariaPass
Could you protect this article ? An user who looks like a SPA, a U2 fan, is doing some positive bias, refusing to include how badly treated the Pixies were as opening band during this 1992 U2 tour. Meanwhile this user thinks it is more worthwhile to include that Spin's journalist was Kim Deal's boyfriend, which looks like an attempt to discredit his work. This Pixies section is oriented in a certain way. Positive bias is a plague on wikipedia. Woovee ( talk) 22:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:COMP § Nvidia GC. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 02:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on User talk:Eyasinarafat.official requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — DaxServer ( talk) 10:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dantearthurs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
Good afternoon sir! I have a question for you. I am a paid editor for the Saugus X Entertainment company and my job is to write for the films and artists in the community. I was told that the page, "DJX Kbrokaysen" was banned for sockpoppeting and we cannot seem to create a page for this person. My question for you is are we able to create a page for this person or are we no longer allowed to do this? My name is Shane by the way, I am the information and promotion guy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaugusXEntertainment ( talk • contribs) 04:33, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:13SEAN VINCENT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:BrendenAbbott mugshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cminogue1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Leslie Camilleri.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lloyd Crosbie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MargaretMaher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:MersinaHalvagis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:NicolePatterson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Peternorrisdupas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 20:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for the block there. You might be interested to know that there was some article hijacking going on there! Graham 87 16:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022! | |
Hello Longhair, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2022. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. / Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for stopping by my page to welcome me to the community, I really appreciate the recognition from a member as senior as you!
RocketsFallOnRocketFalls (
talk) 22:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bad boy bubby.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
indeed you are, your presence and the lack of it at times remains mysterious - trust it is as they say all good JarrahTree 07:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
oversight
will be renamed suppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for
technical reasons. You can comment
in Phabricator if you have objections.Template:WikiProject Tasmania/SimilarWikiProjects has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 20:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
hope its fun and not trauma - look forward to seeing you back sometime... JarrahTree 04:22, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
deletelogentry
and deletedhistory
rights. This means that those in the
Researcher user group and
Checkusers who are not administrators can now access
Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (
T301928)The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello I have removed you from the subscription list of Wikipedia:Administrators' newsletter/Subscribe since you have opted-out of message delivery. Terasail [✉️] 12:24, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Duck Ponds and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 26#Duck Ponds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 ( talk) 07:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Surf beach and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 26#Surf beach until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 ( talk) 09:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Leonard Leonardotypical ( talk) 04:55, 22 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hi, is there any chance for undeleting the draft article about Dolaana Khovalyg? Thanks! Best, Quaenuncabibis ( talk) 07:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:John Wren 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
The file File:WelcomeToWoopWoppSoundtrackCover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Welcome to Woop Woop#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 00:11, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mildura Rural City logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 18:14, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 11:43, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Longhair: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, TheSandDoctor Talk 18:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
From my family to yours: Merry Christmas! TheSandDoctor Talk 18:18, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.
Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 01:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockhampton Correctional Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
JMWt ( talk) 08:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
The file File:NWIRUncookYourself.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free book cover being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in Nat's What I Reckon#History which fails WP:NFCC#8. Non-free book cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about book, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular book cover anywhere in the article, and thus no justification for the file's non-free use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Marchjuly (
talk) 07:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Black coal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 9 § Black coal until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
Template:WP Australia subproject assessment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 09:26, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Category:Serial killers by nationality has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Panamitsu (talk) Please ping on reply 03:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
The article Julie McGregor has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:33, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Longhair,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk) 14:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe ( talk) 14:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The redirect The Best Christmas Ever(That '70s Show episode) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 20 § The Best Christmas Ever(That '70s Show episode) until a consensus is reached. Utopes ( talk / cont) 02:26, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Rags to Riches (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
fails WP:GNG, I was unable to find any coverage in reliable sources demonstrating notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Waxworker (
talk) 16:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Australian cricketers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. -- TheImaCow ( talk) 16:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhett Walton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Boleyn ( talk) 19:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Australian Family Association logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)