Hello Codyorb, thank you very much for doing the GA review of Gardein. I appreciate your feedback and help as it was my first nomination! Thank you so much. SunnyBoi ( talk) 01:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC) |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Alex Shih Talk 03:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Codyorb. Thank you for commencing the GA review of the article Elcor, Minnesota! I know you had placed a hold on the GA status until the rationale for the image File:Don H. Bacon.jpg was replaced to more accurately reflect it's actual use. This has been completed. Have you had a chance to take a look? If you feel it appropriate to promote it to GA status and close out the review, I would like to move on to FA status nomination. I do not know if I can nominate my own article to FA status: might you be willing to assist in this? DrGregMN ( talk) 15:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The Reviewer's Barnstar | ||
Thank you very much for completing the GA review of Elcor, Minnesota. I appreciate the timeliness of your review and your willingness to attack the backlog of GA nominees awaiting review! DrGregMN ( talk) 19:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks for promoting Hard–easy effect to GA status! Meatsgains ( talk) 02:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Codyorb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The {{ current}} template is not designed for use on articles that are merely affected by recent events. It is only designed for articles on current events of which there are fast-changing details and edits. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Codyorb, I noticed that you made a series of edits to the Talk:Peter Jalowiczor page that broke the GA nominee template, all while trying to change the status to "on hold", which was odd because you hadn't been involved in the linked GA review and because nothing on the review page itself indicated that the review should be placed on hold (which means that the reviewer is waiting for the issues raised in the review to be done), since at that point the nominator was waiting to hear from the reviewers.
So I took a look, and saw that you'd made these edits right after you finished posting and passing a GA review at Talk:Robert J. Cenker/GA2, so I took a quick look. It's very unusual that a nomination has no errors at all, not even a misplaced comma or a typo, though it does happen. In this case, the article doesn't meet the manual of style requirement for lead sections; it's a short article yet it has three paragraphs in the lead (see MOS:LEADLENGTH), which should have been noted and dealt with, and there may be more.
Your review of
Talk:GhanaSat-1/GA1 the previous day was more worrying when I looked at it, since in it you post Commencing GA review. I'll begin the review soon.
at 21:38, and completed it seven minutes later at 21:45. That's barely enough time to read the article much less carefully examine the prose, and certainly not enough to check the text against the 13 sources to make sure the article accurately reflects the source information. The lead section in this case is too short because it does not adequate cover the main sections of the article per
MOS:LEAD. It also says that the satellite will be used to monitor environmental activities along Ghana's coastline
, which is odd because the satellite was launched over seven months ago and has a lifetime of eighteen months, so "will be" does not adequately reflect the current status—either it is actually being used for that purpose, or the article is out of date because it doesn't know whether it is or not (and if not when in the next eleven months it will start before it goes out of service), and either way is not ready to be a GA until it reflects current reality. There's also a bit of close paraphrasing that should be dealt with.
It would probably be a good idea to reopen the Cenker and GhanaSat nominations, and check them more closely, especially the latter one. You could ask for a second opinion, given the issues I've noted above, to get a more experienced GA reviewer's view. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Codyorb, Mike Christie, I have reopened the two reviews and posted a new section to each review explaining what is happening. If you have any questions, please let me know.
However, and it's extremely awkward given the new section posted below, the hours-old GA review at Talk:Kimberly Anyadike/GA1 also has problems. In particular, the lead section does not meet the required criterion of MOS:LEAD. The same thing is true here as was true for Talk:GhanaSat-1/GA1: it does not come close to adequately covering the main sections of the article body. I think it, too, needs to be reopened.
Codyorb, I think at this point it would be a very good idea to get a mentor for you GA reviewing; perhaps Mike Christie would be willing to act as your mentor. I would like to request that before you close out any GA review—before you pass it on the article talk page—that you have your mentor check the review first, and only if they agree that the article fully meets the GA criteria do you then wrap up the review. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Codyorb -- Thank you for reviewing (and passing!) Kimberly Anyadike for GA status. I put lots of work into upgrading and expanding the article, and I appreciate your taking the time to review it. All the best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 22:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ultimograph5 -- Ultimograph5 ( talk) 00:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ultimograph5 -- Ultimograph5 ( talk) 21:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 11:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sounder Bruce 08:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.Hi Codyorb,
Thank you very much for doing Peer Review and some changes to Rochelle Blumenfeld article. I really appreciate it. I went ahead and made changes that you recommended. How do I submit it for review? Iblum ( talk) 15:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC) |
On 16 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the solar eclipse of May 20, 2012, began on a Monday and ended on the previous Sunday? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
Thank you for the image of Marina Chapman; however, it is (almost) never acceptable to use a nonfree photo of a person who is still alive. As long as it's theoretically possible to take a free photo, that's what we have to do. DS ( talk) 14:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example is article_text
which is now page_title
.page_age
.Who: All members of the public
What: Filipino American History Month-themed Edit a thon in Mira Mesa, San Diego.
When: Sunday 7 October 2018, 1:00PM PST / 1300 until 3:00PM PST / 1500
Where: Mira Mesa Branch Library
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast ( talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.
(Delivered: 01:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)
I peer reviewed Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012. I have a masters degree in physics and took Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri from C Class to GA, so I'm probably the best qualified editor to review your article. I also considered the fact that it had been submitted for peer review before without any takers and that there are administrator newsletters on your talk page, implying you are an experienced editor.
I have an article waiting for Wikipedia:Peer review/List of unanswered reviews#Indiggo. It is about a band of two identical twins born in Romania, who released an album in high school, studied musical theatre in college, received green cards for extraordinary artistic ability shortly after graduation, became American citizens, are currently performing in an Off-Broadway musical and have just released a cast album.
I think that your article needs to discuss how the eclipse of 5/20/2012 fits into related eclipses. I think some idea of how it ranks among other eclipses for duration and accessibility. (You mention how many people saw it.) Vyeh ( talk) 11:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Who: All members of the public
What: A Edit a thon in Chula Vista.
When: Sunday 11 November 2018, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:00PM PST / 1600
Where: Chula Vista Public Library Civic Center Branch
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast ( talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.
The City of Chula Vista Public Library does not advocate nor endorse the views or positions expressed by the users of its facilities.
— Chula Vista Public Library Meeting Room Policy
(Delivered: 21:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).
Hello, Codyorb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Codyorb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).
Interface administrator changes
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
Who: All members of the public
What: San Diego mini Unconference.
When: Sunday 3 February 2019, 6:00PM PST / 1800 until 7:30PM PST / 1930
Where: Starbucks at Fenton Marketplace
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast ( talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.
(Delivered: 01:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).
Interface administrator changes
Who: All Wikipedians & Wikimedians
What: Southern California Regional mini Unconference.
When: Sunday 3 March 2019, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:10PM PST / 1610
Where: Philippe's at Chinatown, Los Angeles
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast ( talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.
(Delivered: 00:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list & the Los Angeles mass mailing list.)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so
will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).
|
|
US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
Hello, Codyorb! In 2017, your GA review of Elcor, Minnesota helped propel it to FA status. Care to do another one? Manganese, Minnesota has been sitting out there for awhile! Regards, DrGregMN ( talk) 00:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Alex Shibutani has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Just notifying you about an RfC that I opened that relates to a discussion you participated in about the Shibutani ice dance partners. Natg 19 ( talk) 00:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Decade readership has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Trialpears ( talk) 19:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
The WikiEagle |
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter |
Volume I — Issue 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Announcements
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members
New Members
Number of active members: 386.
Total number of members: 921.
Closed Discussions
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New/Ongoing Discussions
On The Main Page Did you know...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at
The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the
mailing list. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Hello. I saw you’re a member of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, and was hoping you could assist on The Points Guy. I posted a few suggested updates to the Talk page Talk:The_Points_Guy#Proposed_Updates_to_Article to improve the article - if possible, can you review the proposed changes? I have a COI, and didn’t want to update the article directly. Thank you for your help! Cheergirl325 ( talk) 15:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello Codyorb! Your input is requested for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Draft proposal for the future of WP:APARKS. Any feedback is welcome. Thank you.
Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 02:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Codyorb. Your input is requested at WikiProject Amusement Parks, as there is a discussion about the reliability of some sources which can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Reliable source discussion. Thank you!
Harobouri T • C (he/him) 16:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello Codyorb, thank you very much for doing the GA review of Gardein. I appreciate your feedback and help as it was my first nomination! Thank you so much. SunnyBoi ( talk) 01:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC) |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Alex Shih Talk 03:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Codyorb. Thank you for commencing the GA review of the article Elcor, Minnesota! I know you had placed a hold on the GA status until the rationale for the image File:Don H. Bacon.jpg was replaced to more accurately reflect it's actual use. This has been completed. Have you had a chance to take a look? If you feel it appropriate to promote it to GA status and close out the review, I would like to move on to FA status nomination. I do not know if I can nominate my own article to FA status: might you be willing to assist in this? DrGregMN ( talk) 15:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The Reviewer's Barnstar | ||
Thank you very much for completing the GA review of Elcor, Minnesota. I appreciate the timeliness of your review and your willingness to attack the backlog of GA nominees awaiting review! DrGregMN ( talk) 19:18, 20 October 2017 (UTC) |
Thanks for promoting Hard–easy effect to GA status! Meatsgains ( talk) 02:22, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Codyorb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The {{ current}} template is not designed for use on articles that are merely affected by recent events. It is only designed for articles on current events of which there are fast-changing details and edits. ViperSnake151 Talk 20:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Codyorb, I noticed that you made a series of edits to the Talk:Peter Jalowiczor page that broke the GA nominee template, all while trying to change the status to "on hold", which was odd because you hadn't been involved in the linked GA review and because nothing on the review page itself indicated that the review should be placed on hold (which means that the reviewer is waiting for the issues raised in the review to be done), since at that point the nominator was waiting to hear from the reviewers.
So I took a look, and saw that you'd made these edits right after you finished posting and passing a GA review at Talk:Robert J. Cenker/GA2, so I took a quick look. It's very unusual that a nomination has no errors at all, not even a misplaced comma or a typo, though it does happen. In this case, the article doesn't meet the manual of style requirement for lead sections; it's a short article yet it has three paragraphs in the lead (see MOS:LEADLENGTH), which should have been noted and dealt with, and there may be more.
Your review of
Talk:GhanaSat-1/GA1 the previous day was more worrying when I looked at it, since in it you post Commencing GA review. I'll begin the review soon.
at 21:38, and completed it seven minutes later at 21:45. That's barely enough time to read the article much less carefully examine the prose, and certainly not enough to check the text against the 13 sources to make sure the article accurately reflects the source information. The lead section in this case is too short because it does not adequate cover the main sections of the article per
MOS:LEAD. It also says that the satellite will be used to monitor environmental activities along Ghana's coastline
, which is odd because the satellite was launched over seven months ago and has a lifetime of eighteen months, so "will be" does not adequately reflect the current status—either it is actually being used for that purpose, or the article is out of date because it doesn't know whether it is or not (and if not when in the next eleven months it will start before it goes out of service), and either way is not ready to be a GA until it reflects current reality. There's also a bit of close paraphrasing that should be dealt with.
It would probably be a good idea to reopen the Cenker and GhanaSat nominations, and check them more closely, especially the latter one. You could ask for a second opinion, given the issues I've noted above, to get a more experienced GA reviewer's view. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Codyorb, Mike Christie, I have reopened the two reviews and posted a new section to each review explaining what is happening. If you have any questions, please let me know.
However, and it's extremely awkward given the new section posted below, the hours-old GA review at Talk:Kimberly Anyadike/GA1 also has problems. In particular, the lead section does not meet the required criterion of MOS:LEAD. The same thing is true here as was true for Talk:GhanaSat-1/GA1: it does not come close to adequately covering the main sections of the article body. I think it, too, needs to be reopened.
Codyorb, I think at this point it would be a very good idea to get a mentor for you GA reviewing; perhaps Mike Christie would be willing to act as your mentor. I would like to request that before you close out any GA review—before you pass it on the article talk page—that you have your mentor check the review first, and only if they agree that the article fully meets the GA criteria do you then wrap up the review. BlueMoonset ( talk) 05:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Codyorb -- Thank you for reviewing (and passing!) Kimberly Anyadike for GA status. I put lots of work into upgrading and expanding the article, and I appreciate your taking the time to review it. All the best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 22:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ultimograph5 -- Ultimograph5 ( talk) 00:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ultimograph5 -- Ultimograph5 ( talk) 21:01, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 11:21, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Sounder Bruce 08:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.Hi Codyorb,
Thank you very much for doing Peer Review and some changes to Rochelle Blumenfeld article. I really appreciate it. I went ahead and made changes that you recommended. How do I submit it for review? Iblum ( talk) 15:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC) |
On 16 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the solar eclipse of May 20, 2012, began on a Monday and ended on the previous Sunday? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
Thank you for the image of Marina Chapman; however, it is (almost) never acceptable to use a nonfree photo of a person who is still alive. As long as it's theoretically possible to take a free photo, that's what we have to do. DS ( talk) 14:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Deprecated. Use ... instead
. An example is article_text
which is now page_title
.page_age
.Who: All members of the public
What: Filipino American History Month-themed Edit a thon in Mira Mesa, San Diego.
When: Sunday 7 October 2018, 1:00PM PST / 1300 until 3:00PM PST / 1500
Where: Mira Mesa Branch Library
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast ( talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.
(Delivered: 01:34, 10 September 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)
I peer reviewed Solar eclipse of May 20, 2012. I have a masters degree in physics and took Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri from C Class to GA, so I'm probably the best qualified editor to review your article. I also considered the fact that it had been submitted for peer review before without any takers and that there are administrator newsletters on your talk page, implying you are an experienced editor.
I have an article waiting for Wikipedia:Peer review/List of unanswered reviews#Indiggo. It is about a band of two identical twins born in Romania, who released an album in high school, studied musical theatre in college, received green cards for extraordinary artistic ability shortly after graduation, became American citizens, are currently performing in an Off-Broadway musical and have just released a cast album.
I think that your article needs to discuss how the eclipse of 5/20/2012 fits into related eclipses. I think some idea of how it ranks among other eclipses for duration and accessibility. (You mention how many people saw it.) Vyeh ( talk) 11:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).
Interface administrator changes
Who: All members of the public
What: A Edit a thon in Chula Vista.
When: Sunday 11 November 2018, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:00PM PST / 1600
Where: Chula Vista Public Library Civic Center Branch
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast ( talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to limited space available.
The City of Chula Vista Public Library does not advocate nor endorse the views or positions expressed by the users of its facilities.
— Chula Vista Public Library Meeting Room Policy
(Delivered: 21:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).
Hello, Codyorb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Codyorb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).
Interface administrator changes
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
Who: All members of the public
What: San Diego mini Unconference.
When: Sunday 3 February 2019, 6:00PM PST / 1800 until 7:30PM PST / 1930
Where: Starbucks at Fenton Marketplace
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast ( talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.
(Delivered: 01:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list.)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).
Interface administrator changes
Who: All Wikipedians & Wikimedians
What: Southern California Regional mini Unconference.
When: Sunday 3 March 2019, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:10PM PST / 1610
Where: Philippe's at Chinatown, Los Angeles
Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )
Your host: RightCowLeftCoast ( talk · contribs)
Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.
(Delivered: 00:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list & the Los Angeles mass mailing list.)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so
will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).
|
|
US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk)
Hello, Codyorb! In 2017, your GA review of Elcor, Minnesota helped propel it to FA status. Care to do another one? Manganese, Minnesota has been sitting out there for awhile! Regards, DrGregMN ( talk) 00:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Alex Shibutani has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Just notifying you about an RfC that I opened that relates to a discussion you participated in about the Shibutani ice dance partners. Natg 19 ( talk) 00:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Template:Decade readership has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Trialpears ( talk) 19:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
The WikiEagle |
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter |
Volume I — Issue 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Announcements
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members
New Members
Number of active members: 386.
Total number of members: 921.
Closed Discussions
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New/Ongoing Discussions
On The Main Page Did you know...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at
The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the
mailing list. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
Hello. I saw you’re a member of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, and was hoping you could assist on The Points Guy. I posted a few suggested updates to the Talk page Talk:The_Points_Guy#Proposed_Updates_to_Article to improve the article - if possible, can you review the proposed changes? I have a COI, and didn’t want to update the article directly. Thank you for your help! Cheergirl325 ( talk) 15:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello Codyorb! Your input is requested for a proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Draft proposal for the future of WP:APARKS. Any feedback is welcome. Thank you.
Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 02:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi, Codyorb. Your input is requested at WikiProject Amusement Parks, as there is a discussion about the reliability of some sources which can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amusement Parks#Reliable source discussion. Thank you!
Harobouri T • C (he/him) 16:40, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)