![]() |
The result was delete . Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
No coverage to meet WP:ORG. Search for old name yields nothing in gnews, and only 1 line mentions in gbooks. LibStar ( talk) 23:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Caliber Comics#Selected titles. ✗ plicit 03:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
PRODded by
BoomboxTestarossa (
talk ·
contribs) with with concern issues not addressed for between 6 and 15 years; nothing to suggest notability, only external link is dead, lots of OR/NPOV, possible out-of-date information
, then deprodded by
StarTrekker (
talk ·
contribs) for alleged mass PROD, but then reinstated by BoomboxTestarossa. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
15:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Criminal Investigation Department (Ireland). ✗ plicit 12:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
This is a WP:POVFORK of Criminal Investigation Department (Ireland). I'd just redirect it, but its an improbable redirect. There doesn't seem to be any content worth saving, since its basically all original research. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 20:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Passions#Cast. ✗ plicit 23:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced list. Pure fancruft. Has been PRODed and endorsed, but PROD was reverted by an IP editor on the basis of being "inaccurate," w/ no other explanation. Proceeding to AfD. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 22:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines for musicians. It was created by an account with a possible COI. The sources used in the article are terrible and demonstrate an absolute lack of coverage in reliable sources. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 22:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No valid deletion given and seems like a clear keep anyway. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex ( talk) 21:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Reason Anogen78 ( talk) 20:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No valid deletion given and seems like a clear keep anyway. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex ( talk) 21:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Reason Anogen78 ( talk) 20:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No valid deletion given and seems like a clear keep anyway. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex ( talk) 21:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Reason Anogen78 ( talk) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Yuriy Esaulov
Association football player who does not satisfy general notability. This article was draftified once by User:Onel5969, and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement. This article has been tagged for notability three times by User: Anwegmann and Onel5969, and the tags have been removed twice. An article should speak for itself, but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject. The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Oleksandr Rudenko
Association football player who does not satisfy general notability. This article was draftified once, and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement. An article should speak for itself, but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject. The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
This is another apparently run-of-the-mill California state court judge. No indicia of encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 18:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be non-notable. Creation by likely sockmaster. Valereee ( talk) 16:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Bexaendos ( talk) 16:09, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep . ✗ plicit 23:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced since at least 2012. Has an AllMusic bio and a handful of reviews from the same, but I don't see anything else. Unless we wanna just assume this band was getting covered all the time in the Scandinavian press but none of that has been digitized and I can't find any of it, then I'm not seeing any other coverage and don't see notability met here. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Måltid. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 15:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to K-pop#Latin America briefly. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
This article reads more like a personal essay than an encyclopedic entry. Even then, I do not think this topic merits inclusion in Wikipedia. I can't recall any articles off the top of my head that goes into genres by country. Since K-pop is a global phenomena, the information here is probably better included in the article on K-pop rather than on a separate page. Also WP:NOR - this appears to be original synthesis interpreting articles than providing sourced analysis. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 15:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOTSTATS WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Electoral record for a single-person council in a place with a current population of seventy-seven. We can debate how big or notable a place has to be to have a spin-off article about its politics (1M? 100K? 10K?), but it's probably not a place as populated as a rather busy subway carriage. No opposition to putting this material on the main village article, with sources of course, or simply just the list of mayors if it's overkill to consider the entire voting history of this little place Unknown Temptation ( talk) 15:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Real Situation Saturday. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2015.
PROD removed with "try AfD" and zero improvements. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
03:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
14:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Samla Mammas Manna. ✗ plicit 14:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable album, fails WP:NALBUM. It has been redirected to the band multiple times, but was reverted on the grounds that "according to WP:NALBUM AllMusic is considered reliable", which is untrue. The guideline does say, however, that "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography", which is the outcome I am requesting. – bradv 13:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep . (non-admin closure) feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 ( talk) 13:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
NN record label UtherSRG (talk) 13:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to House (season 7)#Episodes. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Not every TV episode needs an article, especially one that has only 1 RS reviews found. This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid. In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Non notable actress. Poor resources. BostonMensa ( talk) 11:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to House (season 5)#Episodes. ✗ plicit 14:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Not every TV episode needs an article, especially one that there are no RS reviews for. This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid. In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus . ✗ plicit 14:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Disputed PROD. Article is about a run-of-the-mill farmstand with no significant coverage outside of the local region; the sources found outside of the area are passing mentions in a travel piece about the county as a whole. Attempts to find articles in other regional newspapers (Portland and Vancouver, B.C.) did not yield results. Doesn't pass the WP:NCORP sniff test in my view. Sounder Bruce 04:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus . ✗ plicit 14:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Despite the plethora of sources, they are all mostly primary sources. And yes the student newspaper of the university is a primary source. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 10:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
12:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The article has been deleted per WP:G5. Girth Summit (blether) 13:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Was draftified by M.Ashraf333, then returned to mainspace without any substantive improvement (the addition of a single primary source). Not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG. If the Grammy nomination was true, that would qualify. But it's uncited in the article, and a search of the Grammy database doesn't bring up any matches for Veslocki. Onel5969 TT me 12:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear notable, found nothing except a few blurbs about the hosts not hearing about the cancellation until after the fact. Tagged for notability since 2013. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn.
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
07:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Just like Craig Marduk, she also seems to be lacking WP:sigcov. No actual commentary from reliable sources about her being a Native American besides a book Promoting and Preserving Indigenous Languages and Cultures in the Americas Through Video Games. Most of her content were trivial nor listicles also. Failing WP:GNG. GlatorNator ( ᴛ) 12:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 12:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Another contested draftification with zero improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTDIR WP:NOTTRAVEL. Just a list of unremarkable bus routes in one particular city. Ajf773 ( talk) 10:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
lists like these are not of use to people looking to catch a bus in the cityis correct, but that's not the purpose of these lists and is a reason they don't violate WP:NOTTRAVEL. It doesn't really speak to WP:NOTDIR, but despite multiple assertions that it does violate that I've still seen no arguments demonstrating that it actually does. Thryduulf ( talk) 09:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails NCORP and the GNG. Searches did not turn up significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources.
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
This is not a single things it is just a list of things that would be useful for Fundamental Analysis and if necessary should be included in that article. This is unreferenced and original research at best and I think should be deleted. Sargdub ( talk) 09:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 00:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Per discussion at Talk:Comparison of wiki hosting services (as well as numerous other people in the page history), Nuclino is not notable enough to warrant a standalone article. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Not notable enough. Sources present in the article are nowhere near strong enough to suggest notability; racingsportscars should only be used as a last-resort source for race results only (i.e. it should not be used to confer notability.) A comprehensive BEFORE brings up nothing significant. This seems to be a continuation of Davism's habit of creating sports cars that don't have any notability, such as March-BMW M1/C. X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 08:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2018.
PROD removed with "try AfD" and zero improvements. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musician article created by the subject. Appears to lack WP:SIGCOV and fails to meet the WP:MUSICBIO criteria. All solo albums are through a non-notable label, while his "collaborations" are minor roles where he was not significantly involved. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to DC vs. Marvel#Trading cards. Apparently already merged. Sandstein 16:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Longstanding article that has never had any references. It has been redirected and PROD'd, it is time to see if it is worth keeping at all and whether the current WP:OR can be kept. The lack of references for 10+ years is just asking to be deleted all on its own, but I'm not sure the subject is even notable enough to merit even a well-sourced article. The cards certainly exist, there is even an (uncited, of course!) mention at DC vs. Marvel, as well as a proposed merge of this article that doesn't seem to be tagged here. I suggest redirecting to DC vs. Marvel. Lithopsian ( talk) 15:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
As best as I can determine, this is an old coal shipping point outside of Woodville, not an actual community. Searching is drowned out by a "Glen Fork Junction" that is either the same as or is related to Glen Fork, West Virginia (elsewhere in the state), but I'm finding no significant coverage or coverage that indicates a WP:GEOLAND pass for a "Fork Junction" in Lincoln County. Hog Farm Talk 04:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn . ✗ plicit 03:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy notability requirements. Nothing found in BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2022.
Was PRODded last year and deleted, but granted a REFUND, but 1 year later there has been no additional citations to support notability. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "The result is "Dessert Games," a decidedly sweeter take on the "Guy's Grocery Games" formula. The new series premieres Monday, July 10, on Food Network. At its core, the foundation is the same as it is in "Triple-G." Each episode brings four pasty chefs into the grocery store (actually a TV set, but just as stocked as a real supermarket) with their eyes on the sweet, sweet $10,000 prize. Goldman then issues them a series of dessert challenges, with the contestants needing to run up and down the grocery store aisles to shop for their ingredients."
This article from News24 discusses the South African magazine tvplus. The tvplus article notes: "Gather round if you’ve been dying for a sweet-treat on TV – chefs Guy Fieri from reality show Diners, Drive-ins & Dives and Duff Goldman from baking show Aces Of Cakes have teamed up for the sugariest show ever – Dessert Games! ... For this new show, four talented amateur dessert chefs are challenged to create delicious treats in each of the four episodes, with the winner of each episode earning a $10 000 (R170 000) shopping spree, with a grand prize waiting for them at the end of the season. While Guy assists with the tasting and judging, Duff picks the ultimate dessert diva. ... In episode 1, the chefs make an extravagant deepfried dessert on a budget, followed by a late-night guilty pleasure dessert that must be ready in just 20 minutes."
The article notes: "How do you turn the ingredients for ravioli into a dessert? We’ll see what Charlotte pastry chef Brittani Brooker comes up with when she appears on Food Network show “Dessert Games” tonight. The show, which airs at 8 p.m. Monday, is a spin-off of Guy Fieri’s “Grocery Games” hosted by “dessert master” Duff Goldman. Four chefs compete by shopping, preparing and plating three desserts, with the winner taking home $10,000."
The article notes: "Dessert Games Four new pastry chefs are taking on Duff Goldman's in Guy Fieri's market, and first the chefs must turn Guy's favorite diner classic into a sweet diner dessert imposter. Next, the chefs must repurpose a premade cake into an impressive dessert. Finally, the two remaining chefs play a game in which cake candles determine the special ingredient and the special event tied to their decadent chocolate dessert. Each week, four talented dessert chefs will attempt to shop, prepare and plate three amazing confection- ary creations in the middle of a market, employing shopping shortcuts and food-hack secrets. The last chef standing will get to test their knowledge of dessert ingredients in a sweet shopping spree worth up to $10,000!"
The article notes: "But Monday night, Daytona State head baker Andra Chisholm will appear on Food Network’s debut series “Dessert Games,” a reality cooking competition. The season premiere begins at 8 p.m. ... The format is similar to that of Food Network’s 12-seasons-and-counting reality show “Guy’s Grocery Games,” hosted by Guy Fieri. As in that series, four chefs race to prepare food with ingredients found in a supermarket. They'll compete in three rounds, with one contestant eliminated after each round, for a $10,000 prize. Each round will focus on a different category, and unusual restrictions will be imposed that heighten the challenge."
The article provides a few sentences of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Mr. Fieri is, in fact, the power behind "Dessert Games," the latest victual-reality show from Food Network and a spinoff of his own "Guy's Grocery Games." The participants on Monday's debut were assigned to use the inventory of the show's "supermarket" to make "tricked out" ice-cream sandwiches. The mandatory ingredient: pork rinds. Yes, there are virtues to marrying the salty to the sweet. But not this."
The result was keep . Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Believe it should be delete under WP:NOT because we're directory of software. would like to also suggest that the following be deleted as well
Firefox 3.0 Firefox 3.5 Firefox 3.6 Firefox 4 1keyhole ( talk) 02:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Sourced mostly to PR-fluff and interviews - not convinced there's enough independent coverage to meet WP:NBIO. KH-1 ( talk) 02:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
This is another biography of a run-of-the-mill state judge on a non-statewide appellate court. The subject was born, went to school, had some run-of-the-mill jobs, had marriages and kids, was appointed to this office, and died. This does not reach encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 01:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 00:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete . Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
No coverage to meet WP:ORG. Search for old name yields nothing in gnews, and only 1 line mentions in gbooks. LibStar ( talk) 23:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Caliber Comics#Selected titles. ✗ plicit 03:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
PRODded by
BoomboxTestarossa (
talk ·
contribs) with with concern issues not addressed for between 6 and 15 years; nothing to suggest notability, only external link is dead, lots of OR/NPOV, possible out-of-date information
, then deprodded by
StarTrekker (
talk ·
contribs) for alleged mass PROD, but then reinstated by BoomboxTestarossa. –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄)
15:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Criminal Investigation Department (Ireland). ✗ plicit 12:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
This is a WP:POVFORK of Criminal Investigation Department (Ireland). I'd just redirect it, but its an improbable redirect. There doesn't seem to be any content worth saving, since its basically all original research. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! ⚓ 20:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Passions#Cast. ✗ plicit 23:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced list. Pure fancruft. Has been PRODed and endorsed, but PROD was reverted by an IP editor on the basis of being "inaccurate," w/ no other explanation. Proceeding to AfD. Just Another Cringy Username ( talk) 22:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails notability guidelines for musicians. It was created by an account with a possible COI. The sources used in the article are terrible and demonstrate an absolute lack of coverage in reliable sources. Vinegarymass911 ( talk) 22:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No valid deletion given and seems like a clear keep anyway. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex ( talk) 21:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Reason Anogen78 ( talk) 20:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No valid deletion given and seems like a clear keep anyway. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex ( talk) 21:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Reason Anogen78 ( talk) 20:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. No valid deletion given and seems like a clear keep anyway. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex ( talk) 21:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Reason Anogen78 ( talk) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Yuriy Esaulov
Association football player who does not satisfy general notability. This article was draftified once by User:Onel5969, and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement. This article has been tagged for notability three times by User: Anwegmann and Onel5969, and the tags have been removed twice. An article should speak for itself, but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject. The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Oleksandr Rudenko
Association football player who does not satisfy general notability. This article was draftified once, and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement. An article should speak for itself, but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject. The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
This is another apparently run-of-the-mill California state court judge. No indicia of encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 18:46, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be non-notable. Creation by likely sockmaster. Valereee ( talk) 16:34, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 23:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG Bexaendos ( talk) 16:09, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep . ✗ plicit 23:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced since at least 2012. Has an AllMusic bio and a handful of reviews from the same, but I don't see anything else. Unless we wanna just assume this band was getting covered all the time in the Scandinavian press but none of that has been digitized and I can't find any of it, then I'm not seeing any other coverage and don't see notability met here. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Måltid. QuietHere ( talk | contributions) 15:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to K-pop#Latin America briefly. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 00:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
This article reads more like a personal essay than an encyclopedic entry. Even then, I do not think this topic merits inclusion in Wikipedia. I can't recall any articles off the top of my head that goes into genres by country. Since K-pop is a global phenomena, the information here is probably better included in the article on K-pop rather than on a separate page. Also WP:NOR - this appears to be original synthesis interpreting articles than providing sourced analysis. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 15:31, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 23:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
WP:NOTSTATS WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Electoral record for a single-person council in a place with a current population of seventy-seven. We can debate how big or notable a place has to be to have a spin-off article about its politics (1M? 100K? 10K?), but it's probably not a place as populated as a rather busy subway carriage. No opposition to putting this material on the main village article, with sources of course, or simply just the list of mayors if it's overkill to consider the entire voting history of this little place Unknown Temptation ( talk) 15:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was merge to Real Situation Saturday. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2015.
PROD removed with "try AfD" and zero improvements. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
03:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ks0stm (
T•
C•
G•
E)
14:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Samla Mammas Manna. ✗ plicit 14:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable album, fails WP:NALBUM. It has been redirected to the band multiple times, but was reverted on the grounds that "according to WP:NALBUM AllMusic is considered reliable", which is untrue. The guideline does say, however, that "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography", which is the outcome I am requesting. – bradv 13:15, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was keep . (non-admin closure) feminist🇭🇰🇺🇦 ( talk) 13:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
NN record label UtherSRG (talk) 13:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to House (season 7)#Episodes. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:26, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Not every TV episode needs an article, especially one that has only 1 RS reviews found. This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid. In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 14:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Non notable actress. Poor resources. BostonMensa ( talk) 11:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to House (season 5)#Episodes. ✗ plicit 14:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Not every TV episode needs an article, especially one that there are no RS reviews for. This TV series doesn't have an individual article for every episode, so that arguement for inclusion is invalid. In addition, the plot is already covered in the article on the show. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus . ✗ plicit 14:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Disputed PROD. Article is about a run-of-the-mill farmstand with no significant coverage outside of the local region; the sources found outside of the area are passing mentions in a travel piece about the county as a whole. Attempts to find articles in other regional newspapers (Portland and Vancouver, B.C.) did not yield results. Doesn't pass the WP:NCORP sniff test in my view. Sounder Bruce 04:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
11:50, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was no consensus . ✗ plicit 14:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Despite the plethora of sources, they are all mostly primary sources. And yes the student newspaper of the university is a primary source. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 10:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
12:29, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The article has been deleted per WP:G5. Girth Summit (blether) 13:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Was draftified by M.Ashraf333, then returned to mainspace without any substantive improvement (the addition of a single primary source). Not enough in-depth coverage to show that they pass WP:GNG. If the Grammy nomination was true, that would qualify. But it's uncited in the article, and a search of the Grammy database doesn't bring up any matches for Veslocki. Onel5969 TT me 12:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
12:51, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear notable, found nothing except a few blurbs about the hosts not hearing about the cancellation until after the fact. Tagged for notability since 2013. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was Withdrawn.
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
07:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Just like Craig Marduk, she also seems to be lacking WP:sigcov. No actual commentary from reliable sources about her being a Native American besides a book Promoting and Preserving Indigenous Languages and Cultures in the Americas Through Video Games. Most of her content were trivial nor listicles also. Failing WP:GNG. GlatorNator ( ᴛ) 12:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 12:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Another contested draftification with zero improvement. Not a single in-depth reference from an independent, reliable, secondary source. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Per WP:NOTDIR WP:NOTTRAVEL. Just a list of unremarkable bus routes in one particular city. Ajf773 ( talk) 10:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
lists like these are not of use to people looking to catch a bus in the cityis correct, but that's not the purpose of these lists and is a reason they don't violate WP:NOTTRAVEL. It doesn't really speak to WP:NOTDIR, but despite multiple assertions that it does violate that I've still seen no arguments demonstrating that it actually does. Thryduulf ( talk) 09:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Fails NCORP and the GNG. Searches did not turn up significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources.
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
This is not a single things it is just a list of things that would be useful for Fundamental Analysis and if necessary should be included in that article. This is unreferenced and original research at best and I think should be deleted. Sargdub ( talk) 09:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . ✗ plicit 00:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Per discussion at Talk:Comparison of wiki hosting services (as well as numerous other people in the page history), Nuclino is not notable enough to warrant a standalone article. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
03:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
09:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 12:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Not notable enough. Sources present in the article are nowhere near strong enough to suggest notability; racingsportscars should only be used as a last-resort source for race results only (i.e. it should not be used to confer notability.) A comprehensive BEFORE brings up nothing significant. This seems to be a continuation of Davism's habit of creating sports cars that don't have any notability, such as March-BMW M1/C. X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 08:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 23:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2018.
PROD removed with "try AfD" and zero improvements. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
03:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 13:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Non-notable musician article created by the subject. Appears to lack WP:SIGCOV and fails to meet the WP:MUSICBIO criteria. All solo albums are through a non-notable label, while his "collaborations" are minor roles where he was not significantly involved. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 05:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
06:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was redirect to DC vs. Marvel#Trading cards. Apparently already merged. Sandstein 16:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Longstanding article that has never had any references. It has been redirected and PROD'd, it is time to see if it is worth keeping at all and whether the current WP:OR can be kept. The lack of references for 10+ years is just asking to be deleted all on its own, but I'm not sure the subject is even notable enough to merit even a well-sourced article. The cards certainly exist, there is even an (uncited, of course!) mention at DC vs. Marvel, as well as a proposed merge of this article that doesn't seem to be tagged here. I suggest redirecting to DC vs. Marvel. Lithopsian ( talk) 15:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
05:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 06:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
As best as I can determine, this is an old coal shipping point outside of Woodville, not an actual community. Searching is drowned out by a "Glen Fork Junction" that is either the same as or is related to Glen Fork, West Virginia (elsewhere in the state), but I'm finding no significant coverage or coverage that indicates a WP:GEOLAND pass for a "Fork Junction" in Lincoln County. Hog Farm Talk 04:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn . ✗ plicit 03:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy notability requirements. Nothing found in BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2022.
Was PRODded last year and deleted, but granted a REFUND, but 1 year later there has been no additional citations to support notability. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The article notes: "The result is "Dessert Games," a decidedly sweeter take on the "Guy's Grocery Games" formula. The new series premieres Monday, July 10, on Food Network. At its core, the foundation is the same as it is in "Triple-G." Each episode brings four pasty chefs into the grocery store (actually a TV set, but just as stocked as a real supermarket) with their eyes on the sweet, sweet $10,000 prize. Goldman then issues them a series of dessert challenges, with the contestants needing to run up and down the grocery store aisles to shop for their ingredients."
This article from News24 discusses the South African magazine tvplus. The tvplus article notes: "Gather round if you’ve been dying for a sweet-treat on TV – chefs Guy Fieri from reality show Diners, Drive-ins & Dives and Duff Goldman from baking show Aces Of Cakes have teamed up for the sugariest show ever – Dessert Games! ... For this new show, four talented amateur dessert chefs are challenged to create delicious treats in each of the four episodes, with the winner of each episode earning a $10 000 (R170 000) shopping spree, with a grand prize waiting for them at the end of the season. While Guy assists with the tasting and judging, Duff picks the ultimate dessert diva. ... In episode 1, the chefs make an extravagant deepfried dessert on a budget, followed by a late-night guilty pleasure dessert that must be ready in just 20 minutes."
The article notes: "How do you turn the ingredients for ravioli into a dessert? We’ll see what Charlotte pastry chef Brittani Brooker comes up with when she appears on Food Network show “Dessert Games” tonight. The show, which airs at 8 p.m. Monday, is a spin-off of Guy Fieri’s “Grocery Games” hosted by “dessert master” Duff Goldman. Four chefs compete by shopping, preparing and plating three desserts, with the winner taking home $10,000."
The article notes: "Dessert Games Four new pastry chefs are taking on Duff Goldman's in Guy Fieri's market, and first the chefs must turn Guy's favorite diner classic into a sweet diner dessert imposter. Next, the chefs must repurpose a premade cake into an impressive dessert. Finally, the two remaining chefs play a game in which cake candles determine the special ingredient and the special event tied to their decadent chocolate dessert. Each week, four talented dessert chefs will attempt to shop, prepare and plate three amazing confection- ary creations in the middle of a market, employing shopping shortcuts and food-hack secrets. The last chef standing will get to test their knowledge of dessert ingredients in a sweet shopping spree worth up to $10,000!"
The article notes: "But Monday night, Daytona State head baker Andra Chisholm will appear on Food Network’s debut series “Dessert Games,” a reality cooking competition. The season premiere begins at 8 p.m. ... The format is similar to that of Food Network’s 12-seasons-and-counting reality show “Guy’s Grocery Games,” hosted by Guy Fieri. As in that series, four chefs race to prepare food with ingredients found in a supermarket. They'll compete in three rounds, with one contestant eliminated after each round, for a $10,000 prize. Each round will focus on a different category, and unusual restrictions will be imposed that heighten the challenge."
The article provides a few sentences of coverage about the subject. The article notes: "Mr. Fieri is, in fact, the power behind "Dessert Games," the latest victual-reality show from Food Network and a spinoff of his own "Guy's Grocery Games." The participants on Monday's debut were assigned to use the inventory of the show's "supermarket" to make "tricked out" ice-cream sandwiches. The mandatory ingredient: pork rinds. Yes, there are virtues to marrying the salty to the sweet. But not this."
The result was keep . Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Believe it should be delete under WP:NOT because we're directory of software. would like to also suggest that the following be deleted as well
Firefox 3.0 Firefox 3.5 Firefox 3.6 Firefox 4 1keyhole ( talk) 02:45, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was delete . 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 02:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Sourced mostly to PR-fluff and interviews - not convinced there's enough independent coverage to meet WP:NBIO. KH-1 ( talk) 02:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 01:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
This is another biography of a run-of-the-mill state judge on a non-statewide appellate court. The subject was born, went to school, had some run-of-the-mill jobs, had marriages and kids, was appointed to this office, and died. This does not reach encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 01:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was soft delete . Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:54, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
fails WP:GNG Joeykai ( talk) 00:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)