![]() |
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to a single 9-minute substitute appearance in an allegedly ' fully professional league' six years ago. The rest of his football career has been at a much lower level and there is no evidence of any WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson ( talk) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
BLP for a person who read books "for 122 hours over a five-day stretch"- seems to be a case of WP:BLP1E. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 23:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, nothing in my searches. Störm (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 19:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
No claims to notability found. Flalf Talk 22:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ciara (album). Daniel ( talk) 23:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Not notable per , was not released a single, did not chart and received limited coverage, mainly as part of its inclusion on the album. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 23:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Nothing in my searches to suggest that this player passes WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG. The best source that I could find was this routine announcement in Vavel. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Almost never are elementary schools notable, there is nothing to suggest otherwise for this. The fact it stops as 8th instead of 6th grade does not change that it is part of the general class of elementary schools. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
1. notability: A quick search for sources found some press releases, an unattributed partnership news piece. That fails WP:GNG, let alone WP:NCORP. 2. WP:NOT promotion - this is blatant promotional editing by 5x WP:SPA accounts and 2x IPs Widefox; talk 21:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep due to rough consensus in favour.
As a separate comment, NCRIC is a notability guideline, not an essay. Its relevance as a guideline should be discussed via an RfC, not here. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Declined a few times at WP:AfC. Creator continues to create this article. WP:NORG failure still not addressed; brief quotes from the president do not amount to significant coverage even if in reliable sources. I could not find multiple sources addressing this organisation directly and in depth so notability is still not established. I suspect their may be some underlying promotional intent even though the article itself is written in a neutral tone. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 23:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. No existing page to redirect to. Eddie891 Talk Work 03:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Islamabad cricket team. May be better to redirect to a list of cricketers if/when it's created. Daniel ( talk) 23:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. No current target for proposed redirect. Daniel ( talk) 23:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Slow Food. Daniel ( talk) 23:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Article duplicates information already in Slow Food and topic is not notable on its own. Delete article, but leave a redirect to Slow Food#United States if needed. Platonk ( talk) 19:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
I am concerned that Prabhakar doesn't meet any of the 4 criteria at WP:CREATIVE; I don't think the Kerala State Film Award is enough to pass this on its own. Every single source cited is only a passing mention and the only other source that I could find in my search was this, which is also a passing mention. I am, therefore, concerned about WP:GNG as well. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
I think He meet the criteria WP:CREATIVE . Liju Prabhakar won won 50th Kerala State Film Awards For best colourist and widely cited. [11] [12] [13]. Liju Prabhakar played a major role in Many great films Including Churuli [14], Chola (film) [15] [16],Chase [17], Njan Marykutty [18], Drishyam 2, Happy Wedding. His Work has significant attention in most of the movies that he has worked. So I think this article needed in wikipedia. Thank you Darsana.vinod ( talk) 03:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
This one is another one that's hard to search for. No GNIS entry, not in Gudde, nothing here on topos. I can find some references to three things that could be known as Mendota station, and I'm not seeing anything that would support a notable community being at this location. There is/was a railroad station in Mendota known as Mendota station, but this location isn't particularly close to Mendota. There is a Mendota Substation for electrical production, but it is also too close to the city of Mendota to be this place. There was also a Mendota oil pumping station; I can't find the exact location of where that was. This just doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND as there's no real proof of a notable location at this spot. Hog Farm Talk 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician, whose claims of notability per
WP:NMUSIC are not "inherently" notable enough to withstand how little
reliable source coverage she actually has. The strongest notability claim here is that her sole recorded EP peaked at #10 on the charts -- but that peak wasn't on the
Canadian Albums Chart, but actually on the Canadian Emerging Artists Chart, which is Canada's equivalent to Heatseekers and thus not a notability-making chart.
The next best notability claim is a single which did well at adult contemporary radio -- but that was a duet with another singer who has a strong enough notability claim that his article isn't going anywhere, not a solo single, so any information we need about it can be contained in his article without needing a virtually unsourceable BLP of her to exist alongside it. And otherwise, what's left is a couple of other singles that grazed the very low reaches of the Canadian Hot 100, peaking at positions far too low to confer instant notability freebies in the absence of adequate sourceability.
But the only references here are a discogs.com entry and her own
self-published press release about herself, neither of which are notability-making sources, and even on a search for legitimate media coverage all I can find is a two-article blip of "local singer tries to make it" in her hometown media at the time of the EP's release, which isn't enough to clinch passage of
WP:GNG if it's all she's got. She hasn't stayed active as a recording artist in the intervening decade, so there's no likely prospect of improved coverage happening in the near future either -- if she does achieve something more notable in the future, then an article can obviously be recreated at that time, but nothing here is already "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have quite a bit more reliable source coverage than she has.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whilst there may be routine coverage of individual matches, that should not be synthesised to suggest that there is coverage of the season in any significant manner as a whole. Match reporting occurs at all but the lowest level, what doesn't occur beyond the most notable levels is significant volumes of sourceable prose that discusses the season as a whole or at least in signficant parts. Fenix down ( talk) 23:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
PROD concern was Stats article that does not meet WP:NSEASONS criteria for presumed notability (at least two tiers below professional level) and there is nothing remarkable enough about this season to suggest a WP:GNG pass either. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor is it a sports almanac.
Contested with Plenty sources to meet GNG. Remarkable isnt a criteria. As for NSeasons GNG More impoerant
I don't agree that the sourcing provided shows GNG as they are all, without exception, bare minimum match reporting and transfer reporting, which is routine coverage that any season gets. I found this article which shows some depth of coverage but it's about the previous season. I can't find anything similar for 2012–13 and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate stats database. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. No current target for proposed redirect, can be added at editor discretion if/when it is created. Daniel ( talk) 23:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 13:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG — former mayor of Mandeville, Louisiana (population ~11k), whose local coverage was mostly limited to quotes about various city events. The city named a (non-notable) small community center after him, but that does not meet WP:ANYBIO's threshold of "a well-known and significant award or honor". DanCherek ( talk) 16:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
a short lived talk show that isn't itself notable. There is no meaningful coverage of it but I have no opposition to redirecting it to Mel Robbins article. CUPIDICAE💕 16:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Rush Limbaugh#Phony soldiers. Eddie891 Talk Work 03:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
This overblown article is about a single incident from September - October 2007 that is adequately covered at the Rush Limbaugh article. All of the references are from September or October 2007, indicating that this incident did not have lasting historical significance and thus is not notable. I just checked to see if it received renewed media attention with Limbaugh’s recent death, but it didn’t. The article is massively bloated; almost half of it consists of extended quotes or transcripts. I believe it should be deleted, then converted to a redirect to Rush Limbaugh#Phony soldiers. Note: The article, under a previous non-neutral name, was kept at AfD in October 2007, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reid Smear Letter. MelanieN ( talk) 16:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
This one appears to be the result of a glitch in topo map labelling. The feature is in fact the Dora Belle Campground, and it is still there, up against the lake. The maps labelled it thus, but the label was in the font for a town, and a bit to the west. Then for some reason the word "Campground" got dropped, and so eventually there were three labels: two "Dora Belle"s and one campground. At any rate there was not and is not anything like a settlement in this area north of town. Mangoe ( talk) 16:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Previously nominated with concensus to an article which was already AfD'ed and then merged to create *this* article, which sort of seems like a bad AfD closure. This language is not a notable computer science effort or product. Fails WP:PRODUCT and WP:GNG. Marked for notability for more than two years, only one single reference. Mikeblas ( talk) 22:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC) (categories)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Interstellarity ( talk) 19:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This person is supposedly a supercentenarian. However, her age is unvalidated. This person was listed at List of living centenarians, which I took out because no reliable sources have indicated she is still alive. Not many reliable sources indicate that she is notable. Interstellarity ( talk) 16:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails, WP:Academics. Seems like left academia for industry without spending enough time to develop a notable academic career. And beyond that, there seems to be little else that rises to the level of notability. Hulatam ( talk) 15:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 03:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Former mayor of Vidalia, Louisiana (population <5k), whose coverage is mostly limited to quotes about city projects. Note that numerous previous AfD discussions have established that membership in the Louisiana Political Museum and Hall of Fame in and of itself is not an indication of notability by Wikipedia's standards (see 1, 2, 3, 4). DanCherek ( talk) 15:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized article about a theatre and media project, not reliably sourced as passing our notability standards for organizations or media content. This article, as written, is a bit ambiguous and contradictory about what the topic actually is, but I've been able to locate a couple of primary sources which verify it as a theatre project for youth of the South Sudanese diaspora in Australia -- but the only sources present here are a self-published Eventbrite ticket listing and the streaming profile of a radio station in Juba which fails to mention this at all, let alone actually verifying the fact that's being cited to it. But these aren't reliable or notability-supporting sources, and even on a Google search I can't find anything better. As always, something like this is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- it has to be the subject of journalistic coverage in media to establish its significance, but I can't find any evidence of that. Bearcat ( talk) 14:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:NCORP. Sources relating to routine funding ("a capital transaction, such as raised capital") do not contribute to notability, and nor do sources which are clearly not WP:INDEPENDENT. Coverage in a list of things to watch out for makes it way way TOOSOON. If and when it's notable, it will have independent reliably sourced coverage of its development(s). ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 10:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whilst there may be routine coverage of individual matches, that should not be synthesised to suggest that there is coverage of the season in any significant manner as a whole. Match reporting occurs at all but the lowest level, what doesn't occur beyond the most notable levels is significant volumes of sourceable prose that discusses the season as a whole or at least in signficant parts. Fenix down ( talk) 23:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Contested PROD. No evidence of notability; amateur club playing in a fourth tier semi-pro league. Stats article that does not meet WP:NSEASONS criteria for presumed notability and there is nothing remarkable enough about this season to suggest a WP:GNG pass either. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor is it a sports almanac. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 13:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This list shouldn't exist as there is no unifying factor to the "personalities", the list has grown exceedingly long, holds both linguistic and cultural bias, and is far too subjective to hold any value. It should have never been created in the first place, but what should be done now is to remove it permanently so that it doesn't continue to be a list of some people well known in wine and some of questionable fame. Primecoordinator ( talk) 11:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Selection criteria (also known as inclusion criteria or membership criteria) should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources.Perhaps the concerns from Primecoordinator, Postdlf, and valereee about lack of clarity in this list is that the article title does not provide clear well-defined selection criteria. — MarkH21 talk 01:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Goethe-Institut. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Notability questionable, broader international coverage not evident, and sources appear to be promotional. Acousmana ( talk) 11:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Largely unverifiable. Not a complete hoax, I think, but hugely exaggerated (or just very hard to verify?). I searched both under "Riswan Ali E K" and "Riswan Ali Edakkavil", but found very few results, and none from reliable independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. Fram ( talk) 11:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Padavalam🌂 ► 15:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails to pass WP:GNG Padavalam🌂 ► 09:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This is just a promotional BLP. Fails WP:ENT, WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. RationalPuff ( talk) 09:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Current sources doesn't meet WP:GNG SpareSeiko ( talk) 18:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by an Admin per WP:G5. ( non-admin closure). --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 23:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Completely fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NMUSICIAN Chompy Ace 09:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
BLP(?) article does not meet GNG, BASIC or ANYBIO. I couldn't find anything in the source listed or in search for either of the names in the article. There is very little information in the article to do any research. This might be a BLP from the cats, but the past tense in the article casts doubt on this (maybe they are simply no long sub clan chief). Either way there is no SIGCOV covering the subject directly and in depth. // Timothy :: talk 09:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Not notable; also, "cubinder" is a neologism.
Sources considered: websites such as http://hi.gher.space/; a self-published book (McMullen, Chris (2008). *The Visual Guide To Extra Dimensions.* CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.); a 2018 PhD thesis in geography; a paper from "the 3rd International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications" (2014) purporting to use this and other 4-dimensional geometric figures to model the human thorax. None of these are reliable sources, in my view. I am unaware of any mainstream mathematics source addressing the topic significantly or using the term "cubinder". Adumbrativus ( talk) 07:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Subject clearly fails. WP:NACTOR. Does not have notable roles in any movies. Other than being a participant of a reality show and in some non notable competitions, there is nothing notable to have an independent article as of now. I also doubt the creator of the article has COI with the subject. Its still unclear whether the subject is having a notable role in Marakkar: Arabikadalinte Simham. This might also be a case of WP:TOOSOON Kichu🐘 Discuss 05:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC) Kichu🐘 Discuss 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Church of Christ With the Elijah Message. Sandstein 13:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable religious leader. The refs given are either autobiographical or associated with his church, and apart from more stuff from his church and this blog post which isn't even SIGCOV of Draves, I couldn't find anything else. No substantive arguments were made at the 2004 VfD either. schetm ( talk) 05:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG - one of four people in a helicopter that crashed in the aftermath of Hurricane Agnes. Coverage of the crash mostly only mentions his name and occupation, and he's already briefly mentioned in the Hurricane Agnes article. He did standard journalism work during his lifetime, nothing that really adds to an argument for notability. DanCherek ( talk) 04:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 13:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This theologian might have a lot of hits on Google and speak at Bible conferences, but I don't think his academic achievements reach WP:PROF standards. The previous AfD is eye-opening in how differently AFDs were decided in 2006. Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This is a rare case with no Durham entry, but the reason for that appears to be that the label is for a literal bend in the old route of Kaiser Pass Road. At least, that is what it looks like on the topos. GHits turn up nothing relevant. Mangoe ( talk) 04:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. There's consensus to remove the article. There's no discussion about the proposed redirect to New Zealand's Got Talent (series 2), where she is mentioned. It's up to editors to consider whether such a redirect would be appropriate in the light of this discussion. Sandstein 13:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Subject has requested deletion. She is relatively unknown, and a non-public figure. I am personally in touch with the subject, and assert that she seeks deletion. Subject fails to meet notability criteria for musicians. Coverage subject received was trivial. Subject was a minor child star, and now, as an adult, seeks to remove herself from the spotlight Rklahn ( talk) 02:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:COI is guideline, WP:BIODEL is policy, and should take precedence.Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no clear consensus to keep may be closed as delete.
as a fundamental principle, it is above any policy.
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
One line article lacking sources - tagged since 2013. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. External links only to subject's publications, so the article is essentially WP:PROMO. Geoff | Who, me? 00:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This article does not meet WP:GNG. Heartfox ( talk) 00:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Meets WP:NFOOTBALL due to a single 9-minute substitute appearance in an allegedly ' fully professional league' six years ago. The rest of his football career has been at a much lower level and there is no evidence of any WP:GNG-level coverage. Bring back Daz Sampson ( talk) 21:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
BLP for a person who read books "for 122 hours over a five-day stretch"- seems to be a case of WP:BLP1E. MrsSnoozyTurtle ( talk) 23:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, nothing in my searches. Störm (talk) 17:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 19:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
No claims to notability found. Flalf Talk 22:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Ciara (album). Daniel ( talk) 23:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Not notable per , was not released a single, did not chart and received limited coverage, mainly as part of its inclusion on the album. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 23:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Nothing in my searches to suggest that this player passes WP:NFOOTBALL or WP:GNG. The best source that I could find was this routine announcement in Vavel. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Almost never are elementary schools notable, there is nothing to suggest otherwise for this. The fact it stops as 8th instead of 6th grade does not change that it is part of the general class of elementary schools. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
1. notability: A quick search for sources found some press releases, an unattributed partnership news piece. That fails WP:GNG, let alone WP:NCORP. 2. WP:NOT promotion - this is blatant promotional editing by 5x WP:SPA accounts and 2x IPs Widefox; talk 21:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:08, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep due to rough consensus in favour.
As a separate comment, NCRIC is a notability guideline, not an essay. Its relevance as a guideline should be discussed via an RfC, not here. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Declined a few times at WP:AfC. Creator continues to create this article. WP:NORG failure still not addressed; brief quotes from the president do not amount to significant coverage even if in reliable sources. I could not find multiple sources addressing this organisation directly and in depth so notability is still not established. I suspect their may be some underlying promotional intent even though the article itself is written in a neutral tone. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Daniel ( talk) 23:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. No existing page to redirect to. Eddie891 Talk Work 03:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Islamabad cricket team. May be better to redirect to a list of cricketers if/when it's created. Daniel ( talk) 23:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. No current target for proposed redirect. Daniel ( talk) 23:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 20:02, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was merge to Slow Food. Daniel ( talk) 23:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Article duplicates information already in Slow Food and topic is not notable on its own. Delete article, but leave a redirect to Slow Food#United States if needed. Platonk ( talk) 19:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
I am concerned that Prabhakar doesn't meet any of the 4 criteria at WP:CREATIVE; I don't think the Kerala State Film Award is enough to pass this on its own. Every single source cited is only a passing mention and the only other source that I could find in my search was this, which is also a passing mention. I am, therefore, concerned about WP:GNG as well. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
I think He meet the criteria WP:CREATIVE . Liju Prabhakar won won 50th Kerala State Film Awards For best colourist and widely cited. [11] [12] [13]. Liju Prabhakar played a major role in Many great films Including Churuli [14], Chola (film) [15] [16],Chase [17], Njan Marykutty [18], Drishyam 2, Happy Wedding. His Work has significant attention in most of the movies that he has worked. So I think this article needed in wikipedia. Thank you Darsana.vinod ( talk) 03:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 00:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
This one is another one that's hard to search for. No GNIS entry, not in Gudde, nothing here on topos. I can find some references to three things that could be known as Mendota station, and I'm not seeing anything that would support a notable community being at this location. There is/was a railroad station in Mendota known as Mendota station, but this location isn't particularly close to Mendota. There is a Mendota Substation for electrical production, but it is also too close to the city of Mendota to be this place. There was also a Mendota oil pumping station; I can't find the exact location of where that was. This just doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND as there's no real proof of a notable location at this spot. Hog Farm Talk 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician, whose claims of notability per
WP:NMUSIC are not "inherently" notable enough to withstand how little
reliable source coverage she actually has. The strongest notability claim here is that her sole recorded EP peaked at #10 on the charts -- but that peak wasn't on the
Canadian Albums Chart, but actually on the Canadian Emerging Artists Chart, which is Canada's equivalent to Heatseekers and thus not a notability-making chart.
The next best notability claim is a single which did well at adult contemporary radio -- but that was a duet with another singer who has a strong enough notability claim that his article isn't going anywhere, not a solo single, so any information we need about it can be contained in his article without needing a virtually unsourceable BLP of her to exist alongside it. And otherwise, what's left is a couple of other singles that grazed the very low reaches of the Canadian Hot 100, peaking at positions far too low to confer instant notability freebies in the absence of adequate sourceability.
But the only references here are a discogs.com entry and her own
self-published press release about herself, neither of which are notability-making sources, and even on a search for legitimate media coverage all I can find is a two-article blip of "local singer tries to make it" in her hometown media at the time of the EP's release, which isn't enough to clinch passage of
WP:GNG if it's all she's got. She hasn't stayed active as a recording artist in the intervening decade, so there's no likely prospect of improved coverage happening in the near future either -- if she does achieve something more notable in the future, then an article can obviously be recreated at that time, but nothing here is already "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have quite a bit more reliable source coverage than she has.
Bearcat (
talk)
18:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whilst there may be routine coverage of individual matches, that should not be synthesised to suggest that there is coverage of the season in any significant manner as a whole. Match reporting occurs at all but the lowest level, what doesn't occur beyond the most notable levels is significant volumes of sourceable prose that discusses the season as a whole or at least in signficant parts. Fenix down ( talk) 23:28, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
PROD concern was Stats article that does not meet WP:NSEASONS criteria for presumed notability (at least two tiers below professional level) and there is nothing remarkable enough about this season to suggest a WP:GNG pass either. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor is it a sports almanac.
Contested with Plenty sources to meet GNG. Remarkable isnt a criteria. As for NSeasons GNG More impoerant
I don't agree that the sourcing provided shows GNG as they are all, without exception, bare minimum match reporting and transfer reporting, which is routine coverage that any season gets. I found this article which shows some depth of coverage but it's about the previous season. I can't find anything similar for 2012–13 and Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate stats database. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. No current target for proposed redirect, can be added at editor discretion if/when it is created. Daniel ( talk) 23:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, no coverage found. Störm (talk) 13:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG — former mayor of Mandeville, Louisiana (population ~11k), whose local coverage was mostly limited to quotes about various city events. The city named a (non-notable) small community center after him, but that does not meet WP:ANYBIO's threshold of "a well-known and significant award or honor". DanCherek ( talk) 16:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
a short lived talk show that isn't itself notable. There is no meaningful coverage of it but I have no opposition to redirecting it to Mel Robbins article. CUPIDICAE💕 16:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Rush Limbaugh#Phony soldiers. Eddie891 Talk Work 03:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
This overblown article is about a single incident from September - October 2007 that is adequately covered at the Rush Limbaugh article. All of the references are from September or October 2007, indicating that this incident did not have lasting historical significance and thus is not notable. I just checked to see if it received renewed media attention with Limbaugh’s recent death, but it didn’t. The article is massively bloated; almost half of it consists of extended quotes or transcripts. I believe it should be deleted, then converted to a redirect to Rush Limbaugh#Phony soldiers. Note: The article, under a previous non-neutral name, was kept at AfD in October 2007, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reid Smear Letter. MelanieN ( talk) 16:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
This one appears to be the result of a glitch in topo map labelling. The feature is in fact the Dora Belle Campground, and it is still there, up against the lake. The maps labelled it thus, but the label was in the font for a town, and a bit to the west. Then for some reason the word "Campground" got dropped, and so eventually there were three labels: two "Dora Belle"s and one campground. At any rate there was not and is not anything like a settlement in this area north of town. Mangoe ( talk) 16:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 19:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Previously nominated with concensus to an article which was already AfD'ed and then merged to create *this* article, which sort of seems like a bad AfD closure. This language is not a notable computer science effort or product. Fails WP:PRODUCT and WP:GNG. Marked for notability for more than two years, only one single reference. Mikeblas ( talk) 22:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC) (categories)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Interstellarity ( talk) 19:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This person is supposedly a supercentenarian. However, her age is unvalidated. This person was listed at List of living centenarians, which I took out because no reliable sources have indicated she is still alive. Not many reliable sources indicate that she is notable. Interstellarity ( talk) 16:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails, WP:Academics. Seems like left academia for industry without spending enough time to develop a notable academic career. And beyond that, there seems to be little else that rises to the level of notability. Hulatam ( talk) 15:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 03:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Former mayor of Vidalia, Louisiana (population <5k), whose coverage is mostly limited to quotes about city projects. Note that numerous previous AfD discussions have established that membership in the Louisiana Political Museum and Hall of Fame in and of itself is not an indication of notability by Wikipedia's standards (see 1, 2, 3, 4). DanCherek ( talk) 15:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Semi-advertorialized article about a theatre and media project, not reliably sourced as passing our notability standards for organizations or media content. This article, as written, is a bit ambiguous and contradictory about what the topic actually is, but I've been able to locate a couple of primary sources which verify it as a theatre project for youth of the South Sudanese diaspora in Australia -- but the only sources present here are a self-published Eventbrite ticket listing and the streaming profile of a radio station in Juba which fails to mention this at all, let alone actually verifying the fact that's being cited to it. But these aren't reliable or notability-supporting sources, and even on a Google search I can't find anything better. As always, something like this is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists -- it has to be the subject of journalistic coverage in media to establish its significance, but I can't find any evidence of that. Bearcat ( talk) 14:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Daniel ( talk) 23:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Clearly fails WP:NCORP. Sources relating to routine funding ("a capital transaction, such as raised capital") do not contribute to notability, and nor do sources which are clearly not WP:INDEPENDENT. Coverage in a list of things to watch out for makes it way way TOOSOON. If and when it's notable, it will have independent reliably sourced coverage of its development(s). ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 10:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Whilst there may be routine coverage of individual matches, that should not be synthesised to suggest that there is coverage of the season in any significant manner as a whole. Match reporting occurs at all but the lowest level, what doesn't occur beyond the most notable levels is significant volumes of sourceable prose that discusses the season as a whole or at least in signficant parts. Fenix down ( talk) 23:27, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Contested PROD. No evidence of notability; amateur club playing in a fourth tier semi-pro league. Stats article that does not meet WP:NSEASONS criteria for presumed notability and there is nothing remarkable enough about this season to suggest a WP:GNG pass either. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor is it a sports almanac. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 13:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This list shouldn't exist as there is no unifying factor to the "personalities", the list has grown exceedingly long, holds both linguistic and cultural bias, and is far too subjective to hold any value. It should have never been created in the first place, but what should be done now is to remove it permanently so that it doesn't continue to be a list of some people well known in wine and some of questionable fame. Primecoordinator ( talk) 11:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Selection criteria (also known as inclusion criteria or membership criteria) should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources.Perhaps the concerns from Primecoordinator, Postdlf, and valereee about lack of clarity in this list is that the article title does not provide clear well-defined selection criteria. — MarkH21 talk 01:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Goethe-Institut. Seraphimblade Talk to me 06:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Notability questionable, broader international coverage not evident, and sources appear to be promotional. Acousmana ( talk) 11:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Largely unverifiable. Not a complete hoax, I think, but hugely exaggerated (or just very hard to verify?). I searched both under "Riswan Ali E K" and "Riswan Ali Edakkavil", but found very few results, and none from reliable independent sources. Fails WP:GNG. Fram ( talk) 11:46, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Padavalam🌂 ► 15:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Fails to pass WP:GNG Padavalam🌂 ► 09:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:43, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This is just a promotional BLP. Fails WP:ENT, WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. RationalPuff ( talk) 09:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Current sources doesn't meet WP:GNG SpareSeiko ( talk) 18:26, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete by an Admin per WP:G5. ( non-admin closure). --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 23:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Completely fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:NMUSICIAN Chompy Ace 09:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
BLP(?) article does not meet GNG, BASIC or ANYBIO. I couldn't find anything in the source listed or in search for either of the names in the article. There is very little information in the article to do any research. This might be a BLP from the cats, but the past tense in the article casts doubt on this (maybe they are simply no long sub clan chief). Either way there is no SIGCOV covering the subject directly and in depth. // Timothy :: talk 09:04, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Not notable; also, "cubinder" is a neologism.
Sources considered: websites such as http://hi.gher.space/; a self-published book (McMullen, Chris (2008). *The Visual Guide To Extra Dimensions.* CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.); a 2018 PhD thesis in geography; a paper from "the 3rd International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications" (2014) purporting to use this and other 4-dimensional geometric figures to model the human thorax. None of these are reliable sources, in my view. I am unaware of any mainstream mathematics source addressing the topic significantly or using the term "cubinder". Adumbrativus ( talk) 07:54, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:49, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Subject clearly fails. WP:NACTOR. Does not have notable roles in any movies. Other than being a participant of a reality show and in some non notable competitions, there is nothing notable to have an independent article as of now. I also doubt the creator of the article has COI with the subject. Its still unclear whether the subject is having a notable role in Marakkar: Arabikadalinte Simham. This might also be a case of WP:TOOSOON Kichu🐘 Discuss 05:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC) Kichu🐘 Discuss 05:15, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Church of Christ With the Elijah Message. Sandstein 13:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Non-notable religious leader. The refs given are either autobiographical or associated with his church, and apart from more stuff from his church and this blog post which isn't even SIGCOV of Draves, I couldn't find anything else. No substantive arguments were made at the 2004 VfD either. schetm ( talk) 05:07, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG - one of four people in a helicopter that crashed in the aftermath of Hurricane Agnes. Coverage of the crash mostly only mentions his name and occupation, and he's already briefly mentioned in the Hurricane Agnes article. He did standard journalism work during his lifetime, nothing that really adds to an argument for notability. DanCherek ( talk) 04:52, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was keep. Sandstein 13:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This theologian might have a lot of hits on Google and speak at Bible conferences, but I don't think his academic achievements reach WP:PROF standards. The previous AfD is eye-opening in how differently AFDs were decided in 2006. Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 11:54, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This is a rare case with no Durham entry, but the reason for that appears to be that the label is for a literal bend in the old route of Kaiser Pass Road. At least, that is what it looks like on the topos. GHits turn up nothing relevant. Mangoe ( talk) 04:09, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. There's consensus to remove the article. There's no discussion about the proposed redirect to New Zealand's Got Talent (series 2), where she is mentioned. It's up to editors to consider whether such a redirect would be appropriate in the light of this discussion. Sandstein 13:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Subject has requested deletion. She is relatively unknown, and a non-public figure. I am personally in touch with the subject, and assert that she seeks deletion. Subject fails to meet notability criteria for musicians. Coverage subject received was trivial. Subject was a minor child star, and now, as an adult, seeks to remove herself from the spotlight Rklahn ( talk) 02:11, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
WP:COI is guideline, WP:BIODEL is policy, and should take precedence.Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no clear consensus to keep may be closed as delete.
as a fundamental principle, it is above any policy.
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
One line article lacking sources - tagged since 2013. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. External links only to subject's publications, so the article is essentially WP:PROMO. Geoff | Who, me? 00:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 13:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This article does not meet WP:GNG. Heartfox ( talk) 00:19, 26 February 2021 (UTC)