The result was delete. I see a consensus that the subject fails WP:GNG. In answer to comments; the statement that there /could/ be sources carries no weight; at a minimum we need to have a basis for expecting sources to be out there. Also, the fact that he died a long time ago obviously does not preclude meeting WP:GNG as articles on numerous historical figures attest. Just Chilling ( talk) 00:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Van Orden was a member of the militia of a city. He was not even a high ranking officer in that militia, which in and of itself would not make him notable, nor was he a member of it when it was continued under the same name as a territorial militia and fought multiple wars. He was not even an active officer in 1845 when the Nauvoo Militia was involved with skirmishes with other militia's in Hancock County, Illinois trying to discourage the burning of crops and houses. No, he was part of the honor gaurd for the slain head of the militia, and then got pnemonia and died. The first source mentions him as an example of the everman, only because the author is his direct descendant. The second is a family geneological web page. Nothing comes even remotely close to showing notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
"Bruce A. Van Orden, a great great grandson, Written in 2004, the 200th Anniversary of William’s Birth". The author is a qualified expert, however it is hard to call this an WP:INDEPENDENT source, and publication on a family website (without citations, in a voice that is far from undetached) is a tad different from most academic publications (e.g. [1]) by the same author. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this website fails our notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 00:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
This website is not notable--the references are essentially press releases. DGG ( talk ) 23:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that the subject fails WP:BAND. Just Chilling ( talk) 00:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Article appears to have been written by a member of the band, and primary claims of notability are 1) featured in a Rolling Stone Magazine article, and 2) listed as having had one of the top 50 albums in mainland China by That's Shanghai magazine.
The Rolling Stone source is obviously incorrect, as it cites issue 243 which was published in 1977, more than 25 years before this band became active. There may be another article that does feature this band, but I was unable to find it. The WP article also cites an LA Times article for the same claim, but the actual LA Times article never mentions Proximity Butterfly. The That's Shanghai article does appear to be legitimate, but is not sufficient to meet WP:BAND. Paisarepa ( talk) 23:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
FYI, nominators comment about the Rolling Stone issue: just a guess, but the reference may be to the Chinese Edition of Rolling Stone. International editions of Rolling Stone have different numbering than the "official" U.S. counterpart. ShelbyMarion ( talk) 12:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Haukur ( talk) 23:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Subject is an academic and an author. No indication in the article that he meets WP:NACADEMIC. As for WP:AUTHOR, he wrote one book that is somewhat known but doesn't appear to rise to the notability standard. There is a claim that the book was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize, but it is unsourced and I have been unable to verify it. Paisarepa ( talk) 22:57, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Whilst there is significant support for a Dave MacKay and Vicky Hamilton page that is not the consensus. I see the consensus to be 'keep' but recommend a post-AfD 'move' discussion. Just Chilling ( talk) 00:25, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
No notability outside of forming a duo with Dave MacKay. Not even any solo releases. Merge or redirect? FoxyGrampa75 ( talk) 02:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that all three films fail WP:NFILM. Just Chilling ( talk) 22:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Three completely unsourced articles about short films with no credible claim to passing WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not handed an automatic notability freebie just because the director happens to have a BLP: the notability test for a film requires things like winning or being nominated for noteworthy film awards, and/or being sourceable to enough evidence of reliable source coverage about it (e.g. actual film reviews by professional film critics) to clear WP:GNG. But none of these three films have either of those things at all, and they're not exempted from having to have notability claims just because they're available on YouTube either. Mitrani's feature films ain't going anywhere, because they all clear NFILM much better even if the articles technically still need improvement, but his pre-Igor Rizzi short films just don't clear the notability bar at all. Bearcat ( talk) 22:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this series of documentary movies fails our notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 22:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article about a documentary film series, not properly sourced as clearing WP:NFILM. As always, every film or series is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it's technically verifiable as existing -- but the only references here are a user-generated list of the films on a WordPress blog and YouTube copies of the films themselves, not reliable source media coverage about the films as would be required to deem them notable. Bearcat ( talk) 21:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus that the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Just Chilling ( talk) 20:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. They're a couple of passing mentions about subject outside that no in-depth coverage at this time. He was a candidate for House of Representatives which he was never elected to or participated in elections. Lapablo ( talk) 19:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. This has been a poorly attended AfD but there is a light consensus for deletion. There have been no comments for over a fortnight so I don't think that yet another reist can be justified. Just Chilling ( talk) 20:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
It does not appear he has directed any notable films, or founded any notable companies. The various listings in "outstanding young entrepreneur in Michigan " and the like are just PR. The references as well, as either Pr, rivial, or both. DGG ( talk ) 07:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this beverage fails our notability standards. Just Chilling ( talk) 20:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
No sources listed in the article or found anywhere. This drink is unremarkable, and essentially just the vodka-cranberry/Cape Codder cocktail. ɱ (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that the subject fails our notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 20:32, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Most of the references make no mention of the subject especially the sources from BBC. Lapablo ( talk) 19:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep. Reliable sources have been shown and AfD is not cleanup. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 09:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Very poorly cited article. Due to the commonality of the name looking for sources was difficult, but searches in News and Books did not uncover enough in-depth coverage to show it meets WP:GNG. Was a redirect, but another editor insists of page re-creation without any attempt at improvement. Onel5969 TT me 18:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Masum Reza 📞 18:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a small-town (pop. 12K) mayor, not reliably sourced as the subject of enough press coverage to clear WP:NPOL #2. As always, smalltown mayors are not automatically handed a notability freebie just because one or two pieces of purely local media coverage in their home media market can be shown to verify that they exist -- at this level of significance, the notability test is the ability to show a depth and range of coverage that marks him out as much more notable than most other mayors of places this size, such as nationalizing beyond just the local media. But people also don't get Wikipedia articles just for declaring their candidacies in future political party primaries, or for being the Eliza Doolittle in one episode of a television makeover show -- so nothing else here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have nationalizing coverage of his mayoralty. Of course, no prejudice against recreation in November 2020 if he wins the congressional election, but nothing here constitutes a reason why he would already qualify for a Wikipedia article today. Bearcat ( talk) 18:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus that this film fails WP:NFILM. Just Chilling ( talk) 18:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article about a short film, not properly referenced as passing WP:NFILM. Every film is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because its director happens to have a BLP -- the notability criteria for films require things like winning or being nominated for notable film awards, and/or having enough reliable source attention from professional film critics that it clears WP:GNG on the sourcing. But there are no references being cited here at all besides the IMDb profile itself, and even the IMDb profile doesn't list any awards that would count as notability-makers either. Bearcat ( talk) 18:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88( talk) 13:26, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:BIO, WP:GNG. Subject is not notable. Paisarepa ( talk) 17:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this duo fail notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 18:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article about a musical theatre composing duo, not properly referenced as notable. Three of the five footnotes here are to their own self-published primary source content about themselves, while the other two are glancing namechecks of their existence in coverage of other people's work. As always, topics of this type are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's technically possible to verify that they exist -- the notability test is the reception of enough reliable source coverage about their work to clear WP:GNG for it. Also, this is a direct conflict of interest if you check the creator's username. Wikipedia is WP:NOTLINKEDIN, and is not a free public relations platform on which people are entitled to place themselves for extra publicity — we're an encyclopedia, on which making it comes first and then the Wikipedia article follows, not vice versa. Bearcat ( talk) 17:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this software fails notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 18:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This was recently prodded by Premeditated Chaos, with the rationale "Non-notable piece of computer software. Can't find any independent in-depth sources discussing the program. Being listed on download sites isn't sufficient for notability." However, as it was already prodded in 2006, it cannot be prodded again. I agree with the rationale so I am taking it to AfD instead. — David Eppstein ( talk) 17:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 17:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Poorly written, unencyclopedic orphan that is better suited as a small section in a related article about student loans. This page is written like a guide. Also, I am not sure that the page title is even appropriate. Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 16:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 17:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Non notable producer. Being one of the producers of some low key festival movies is not enough to impart any notability to the said person. Has been made by a user with an obvious WP:COI, who has made all the articles for everyone and every movie associated with some movie making collective Jupitus Smart 16:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was Deleted as " G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban" by User:Bbb23. (I am only closing the Afd.) §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 03:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
The prod was removed by user "Sanai Jeo" (possible sock account) with no convincing statements and appears to have a conflict of interest. The subject fails WP:NFOOTY, as she has not played senior international football nor a fully professional league and there is no indication that the subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BIO. GSS ( talk| c| em) 15:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 17:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
It's true that he has a book that he allegedly wrote through facilitated communication, and even a film produced about him, but most sources in German and English falsely claim that he can communicate through facilitated communication, which is scientifically unreliable. See Amy Sequenzia, Sue Rubin, and Benjamin Alexander (writer) as examples of similar deleted articles. There is at least one article that questions his method of communication ( https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13684517.html), but it is not clear whether he is notable as a subject of controversy. Ylevental ( talk) 14:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 17:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, this is not a real thing. It's a spam factory. I have personally connected 5 out of the 14 links to an alias identical or eerily similar to the username that created this article. I am now reviewing all their contributions for promo/spam. More might be incoming. Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 14:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88( talk) 13:24, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Bangladeshi singer who fails
WP:MUSICBIO. not enough to establish notability Singer, Does not meet criteria of
WP:GNG. fails
WP:GNG. this singer seems to be too early in the concept phase for any such coverage to exist then it means
WP:TOOSOON for this young singer. all of source are published recent. she did not receive any award. Even, i didn't find any notable album.she did not participate in any competition of bangladesh.. i don't think a number of source only Daily Star news, isn't prove notable singer. --
Nahal
(T)
13:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. G7 by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 20:53, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Misuse of Wikipedia as a free web host. MER-C 11:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I should be grateful if you could kindly not delete this page as it will be benficial to the community.
I'm an individual and I have no commercial intentions. I have worked for more than 20 years in IT and I have found that a master page like this was missing where people and organizations could find a master index of information in one place.
As you will see in the article I am talking about several IT practices, standards, frameworks, methodologies.
I have no specific interest in anyone of them in particular. They are all from different organizations.
This page is a master index on the web.
Could you please share the details of what is wrong with the article?
Thanks and regards
Clive Perry Ramen
Hello, is it possible for you to help me so that I can get the article to be rewritten encyclopedically please? I would be happy to pay for the services if required provided that its affordable to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryRamen ( talk • contribs) 13:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I have revised the article to be encyclopedic. I should be grateful if you could kindly re-assess the article please. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryRamen ( talk • contribs) 14:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a personal webpage that I have developed. I have more than 20 years of experience in IT and I'm an SME (Subject Matter Expert) in ITSM & Operations. The contents of this article is different from the contents of Outline of information technology. Article IT service management does not address the Operations part of IT. Neither does it address all the Practices, Standards, Frameworks, Activities, Behaviours, Tools & Techniques listed in my article. If you delete this article you will destroy the start of a Master Index for Wikipedia in IT Service Management & Operations. I have updated the article to specify that it is a Global Index so that this article does not duplicate existing articles and added the required categories. I should be grateful if you could kindly consider approval of the article please. Respectfully yours, Perry.
You may check my LinkedIn profile at:
www
— Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryRamen ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I have implemented all your recommendations. I have also explained to you how this article is different from other articles that you have mentioned in the sense that it is a Global Index for IT Service Management & Operations. I have also explained to you that this article is not a duplicate of existing articles and that such a Global Index for IT Service Management & Operations was missing from Wikipedia. I am building this article in favour of Wikipedia. Having worked in IT for over 20 years, I have a holistic view of IT Service Management & Operations. I was myself lost before sometimes when looking for information due to the fact that there was not a central Index listing all the IT best practices, standards, guidelines, methodologies, frameworks, concepts, approaches, behaviours, techniques & tools on the web. This page is the Global Index that was missing and will be most beneficial to the community and Wikipedia. If you take a look at column "References & Links" of table "IT Practices/Processes/Functions/Activities", you will be able to see how many items do not have a link yet. These are separate articles that are yet to be written and developed on wikipedia. The table shows you at a glance what areas of IT have and don't have articles yet. I am working with and for Wikipedia by building and maintaining this page and I bring all my experience in IT to wikipedia. I will maintain the page and make it the Best Global Index in IT Service Management & Operations on the web. Please rest assured that you can rely on me. I should be grateful if you could kindly consider approval of the article please. Is it possible for me to have a status update from your side accordingly please? Respectfully yours, Perry.
LinkedIn profile at:
www
Hello, I have been trying to explain to you that this article is not a guidebook or textbook but a Global Index.
You may proceed with the deletion of the article if you think that its not worthy.
Kind Regards
Perry — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryRamen ( talk • contribs) 07:07, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I should be grateful if you could kindly delete the page please. Thank you very much. Perry Ramen. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
PerryRamen (
talk •
contribs)
23:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus that this list fails WP:NLIST. Just Chilling ( talk) 14:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
WP:LISTCRUFT, fails WP:NLIST and cricket guidelines. Störm (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Userfication can be requested at WP:REFUND or elsewhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
WP:LISTCRUFT, fails WP:NLIST and cricket guidelines. Störm (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Userfication can be requested at WP:REFUND or elsewhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
WP:LISTCRUFT, fails WP:NLIST. Störm (talk) 11:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Alexander Windsor, Earl of Ulster. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
User:Surtsicna rationale: She is not notable as a physician. She does no royal work, so she is not notable as such either. She is just not notable at all. The sources cited here confirm that. Boldly redirecting to the article about her husband Pelmeen10 ( talk) 11:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per Uncle G's comment. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 17:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Subject is an attorney who does not meet notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Article cites several sources, but almost all only mention subject in passing, or quote the subject in an article about someone or something else. Editor(s) with a conflict of interest have created suggested edits in the talk page that include an additional 98 references, but again I can't find any that are about the subject; all are about other people, court cases, etc., with the subject quoted or mentioned. Paisarepa ( talk) 06:42, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article seems to be written like an advertisement. The subject alone doesn't seem to be notable either to separate it from the Commodore 64 article. I found a few reliable sources upon a quick Google search on the Commodore 64 homebrew scene but I don't think it's enough coverage to establish general notability and it's only worthy of a short sub-section in its parent subject's article at best. letcreate123 ( talk) 05:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 06:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Cannot find significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Search results turning up brief mentions and routine reports [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23]. Player is apparently retired now and a youth coach. [24] [25]. Not to be confused with other people with the same name, including an Irish footballer born in 1994 [26] [27] [28]. – Leviv ich 05:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:N at it's present state. Feickus ( talk) 04:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
An academic event which 100 people attended does not seem notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article. This seems to fail WP:NEWSEVENT. Marquardtika ( talk) 14:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article is about a casualty of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. The subject fails WP:N and WP:SOLDIER. Feickus ( talk) 04:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The arguments by Hunter Kahn do not address the uncontested substantive problems with the article. Deleting unsalvageable promotional content in order to allow a neutral rewrite is standard practice. Sandstein 08:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
highly promotional article , though on a worthy product. Almost all the article is devoted to the problems it hopes to solve, rather than the ostensible subject of the article. It needs complete rewriting, and the first step for that is to remove the existing PR-based article DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
per WP:BIO1E and WP:BARE, just a little notable for only one event in 2008 and nothing then, his role in 2011 revolution is not notable nor memorable, just few articles from his mates describe him as "leader" and that is exaggeration and no one knows what is his exactly role, he has no awards nor political positions too. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 00:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Not notable; searching online reveals no new work or news for sometime. Books are largely self published, and most references are his own social media accounts or lead to blank pages ie. MENA Water Resources World Conference Bottletoppen ( talk) 15:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus that this actor fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR Just Chilling ( talk) 00:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
No significant roles in notable films (his biggest role was in 8ish, which has dubious notability). Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 00:07, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. I see a consensus that the subject fails WP:GNG. In answer to comments; the statement that there /could/ be sources carries no weight; at a minimum we need to have a basis for expecting sources to be out there. Also, the fact that he died a long time ago obviously does not preclude meeting WP:GNG as articles on numerous historical figures attest. Just Chilling ( talk) 00:21, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Van Orden was a member of the militia of a city. He was not even a high ranking officer in that militia, which in and of itself would not make him notable, nor was he a member of it when it was continued under the same name as a territorial militia and fought multiple wars. He was not even an active officer in 1845 when the Nauvoo Militia was involved with skirmishes with other militia's in Hancock County, Illinois trying to discourage the burning of crops and houses. No, he was part of the honor gaurd for the slain head of the militia, and then got pnemonia and died. The first source mentions him as an example of the everman, only because the author is his direct descendant. The second is a family geneological web page. Nothing comes even remotely close to showing notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 00:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
"Bruce A. Van Orden, a great great grandson, Written in 2004, the 200th Anniversary of William’s Birth". The author is a qualified expert, however it is hard to call this an WP:INDEPENDENT source, and publication on a family website (without citations, in a voice that is far from undetached) is a tad different from most academic publications (e.g. [1]) by the same author. Icewhiz ( talk) 14:06, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this website fails our notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 00:11, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
This website is not notable--the references are essentially press releases. DGG ( talk ) 23:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that the subject fails WP:BAND. Just Chilling ( talk) 00:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Article appears to have been written by a member of the band, and primary claims of notability are 1) featured in a Rolling Stone Magazine article, and 2) listed as having had one of the top 50 albums in mainland China by That's Shanghai magazine.
The Rolling Stone source is obviously incorrect, as it cites issue 243 which was published in 1977, more than 25 years before this band became active. There may be another article that does feature this band, but I was unable to find it. The WP article also cites an LA Times article for the same claim, but the actual LA Times article never mentions Proximity Butterfly. The That's Shanghai article does appear to be legitimate, but is not sufficient to meet WP:BAND. Paisarepa ( talk) 23:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
FYI, nominators comment about the Rolling Stone issue: just a guess, but the reference may be to the Chinese Edition of Rolling Stone. International editions of Rolling Stone have different numbering than the "official" U.S. counterpart. ShelbyMarion ( talk) 12:11, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Haukur ( talk) 23:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Subject is an academic and an author. No indication in the article that he meets WP:NACADEMIC. As for WP:AUTHOR, he wrote one book that is somewhat known but doesn't appear to rise to the notability standard. There is a claim that the book was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize, but it is unsourced and I have been unable to verify it. Paisarepa ( talk) 22:57, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Whilst there is significant support for a Dave MacKay and Vicky Hamilton page that is not the consensus. I see the consensus to be 'keep' but recommend a post-AfD 'move' discussion. Just Chilling ( talk) 00:25, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
No notability outside of forming a duo with Dave MacKay. Not even any solo releases. Merge or redirect? FoxyGrampa75 ( talk) 02:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that all three films fail WP:NFILM. Just Chilling ( talk) 22:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Three completely unsourced articles about short films with no credible claim to passing WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not handed an automatic notability freebie just because the director happens to have a BLP: the notability test for a film requires things like winning or being nominated for noteworthy film awards, and/or being sourceable to enough evidence of reliable source coverage about it (e.g. actual film reviews by professional film critics) to clear WP:GNG. But none of these three films have either of those things at all, and they're not exempted from having to have notability claims just because they're available on YouTube either. Mitrani's feature films ain't going anywhere, because they all clear NFILM much better even if the articles technically still need improvement, but his pre-Igor Rizzi short films just don't clear the notability bar at all. Bearcat ( talk) 22:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this series of documentary movies fails our notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 22:44, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article about a documentary film series, not properly sourced as clearing WP:NFILM. As always, every film or series is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because it's technically verifiable as existing -- but the only references here are a user-generated list of the films on a WordPress blog and YouTube copies of the films themselves, not reliable source media coverage about the films as would be required to deem them notable. Bearcat ( talk) 21:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus that the subject fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. Just Chilling ( talk) 20:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. They're a couple of passing mentions about subject outside that no in-depth coverage at this time. He was a candidate for House of Representatives which he was never elected to or participated in elections. Lapablo ( talk) 19:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. This has been a poorly attended AfD but there is a light consensus for deletion. There have been no comments for over a fortnight so I don't think that yet another reist can be justified. Just Chilling ( talk) 20:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
It does not appear he has directed any notable films, or founded any notable companies. The various listings in "outstanding young entrepreneur in Michigan " and the like are just PR. The references as well, as either Pr, rivial, or both. DGG ( talk ) 07:46, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this beverage fails our notability standards. Just Chilling ( talk) 20:34, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
No sources listed in the article or found anywhere. This drink is unremarkable, and essentially just the vodka-cranberry/Cape Codder cocktail. ɱ (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that the subject fails our notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 20:32, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Most of the references make no mention of the subject especially the sources from BBC. Lapablo ( talk) 19:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep. Reliable sources have been shown and AfD is not cleanup. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 09:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Very poorly cited article. Due to the commonality of the name looking for sources was difficult, but searches in News and Books did not uncover enough in-depth coverage to show it meets WP:GNG. Was a redirect, but another editor insists of page re-creation without any attempt at improvement. Onel5969 TT me 18:56, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Masum Reza 📞 18:26, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a small-town (pop. 12K) mayor, not reliably sourced as the subject of enough press coverage to clear WP:NPOL #2. As always, smalltown mayors are not automatically handed a notability freebie just because one or two pieces of purely local media coverage in their home media market can be shown to verify that they exist -- at this level of significance, the notability test is the ability to show a depth and range of coverage that marks him out as much more notable than most other mayors of places this size, such as nationalizing beyond just the local media. But people also don't get Wikipedia articles just for declaring their candidacies in future political party primaries, or for being the Eliza Doolittle in one episode of a television makeover show -- so nothing else here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have nationalizing coverage of his mayoralty. Of course, no prejudice against recreation in November 2020 if he wins the congressional election, but nothing here constitutes a reason why he would already qualify for a Wikipedia article today. Bearcat ( talk) 18:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus that this film fails WP:NFILM. Just Chilling ( talk) 18:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article about a short film, not properly referenced as passing WP:NFILM. Every film is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because its director happens to have a BLP -- the notability criteria for films require things like winning or being nominated for notable film awards, and/or having enough reliable source attention from professional film critics that it clears WP:GNG on the sourcing. But there are no references being cited here at all besides the IMDb profile itself, and even the IMDb profile doesn't list any awards that would count as notability-makers either. Bearcat ( talk) 18:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88( talk) 13:26, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:BIO, WP:GNG. Subject is not notable. Paisarepa ( talk) 17:46, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this duo fail notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 18:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article about a musical theatre composing duo, not properly referenced as notable. Three of the five footnotes here are to their own self-published primary source content about themselves, while the other two are glancing namechecks of their existence in coverage of other people's work. As always, topics of this type are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because it's technically possible to verify that they exist -- the notability test is the reception of enough reliable source coverage about their work to clear WP:GNG for it. Also, this is a direct conflict of interest if you check the creator's username. Wikipedia is WP:NOTLINKEDIN, and is not a free public relations platform on which people are entitled to place themselves for extra publicity — we're an encyclopedia, on which making it comes first and then the Wikipedia article follows, not vice versa. Bearcat ( talk) 17:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Unanimity that this software fails notability guidelines. Just Chilling ( talk) 18:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
This was recently prodded by Premeditated Chaos, with the rationale "Non-notable piece of computer software. Can't find any independent in-depth sources discussing the program. Being listed on download sites isn't sufficient for notability." However, as it was already prodded in 2006, it cannot be prodded again. I agree with the rationale so I am taking it to AfD instead. — David Eppstein ( talk) 17:13, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 17:18, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Poorly written, unencyclopedic orphan that is better suited as a small section in a related article about student loans. This page is written like a guide. Also, I am not sure that the page title is even appropriate. Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 16:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 17:16, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Non notable producer. Being one of the producers of some low key festival movies is not enough to impart any notability to the said person. Has been made by a user with an obvious WP:COI, who has made all the articles for everyone and every movie associated with some movie making collective Jupitus Smart 16:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was Deleted as " G5: Creation by a blocked or banned user in violation of block or ban" by User:Bbb23. (I am only closing the Afd.) §§ Dharmadhyaksha§§ { Talk / Edits} 03:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
The prod was removed by user "Sanai Jeo" (possible sock account) with no convincing statements and appears to have a conflict of interest. The subject fails WP:NFOOTY, as she has not played senior international football nor a fully professional league and there is no indication that the subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BIO. GSS ( talk| c| em) 15:02, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 17:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
It's true that he has a book that he allegedly wrote through facilitated communication, and even a film produced about him, but most sources in German and English falsely claim that he can communicate through facilitated communication, which is scientifically unreliable. See Amy Sequenzia, Sue Rubin, and Benjamin Alexander (writer) as examples of similar deleted articles. There is at least one article that questions his method of communication ( https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13684517.html), but it is not clear whether he is notable as a subject of controversy. Ylevental ( talk) 14:59, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 🐱 17:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, this is not a real thing. It's a spam factory. I have personally connected 5 out of the 14 links to an alias identical or eerily similar to the username that created this article. I am now reviewing all their contributions for promo/spam. More might be incoming. Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 14:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88( talk) 13:24, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Bangladeshi singer who fails
WP:MUSICBIO. not enough to establish notability Singer, Does not meet criteria of
WP:GNG. fails
WP:GNG. this singer seems to be too early in the concept phase for any such coverage to exist then it means
WP:TOOSOON for this young singer. all of source are published recent. she did not receive any award. Even, i didn't find any notable album.she did not participate in any competition of bangladesh.. i don't think a number of source only Daily Star news, isn't prove notable singer. --
Nahal
(T)
13:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete. G7 by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν) 20:53, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Misuse of Wikipedia as a free web host. MER-C 11:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
I should be grateful if you could kindly not delete this page as it will be benficial to the community.
I'm an individual and I have no commercial intentions. I have worked for more than 20 years in IT and I have found that a master page like this was missing where people and organizations could find a master index of information in one place.
As you will see in the article I am talking about several IT practices, standards, frameworks, methodologies.
I have no specific interest in anyone of them in particular. They are all from different organizations.
This page is a master index on the web.
Could you please share the details of what is wrong with the article?
Thanks and regards
Clive Perry Ramen
Hello, is it possible for you to help me so that I can get the article to be rewritten encyclopedically please? I would be happy to pay for the services if required provided that its affordable to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryRamen ( talk • contribs) 13:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I have revised the article to be encyclopedic. I should be grateful if you could kindly re-assess the article please. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryRamen ( talk • contribs) 14:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, this is a personal webpage that I have developed. I have more than 20 years of experience in IT and I'm an SME (Subject Matter Expert) in ITSM & Operations. The contents of this article is different from the contents of Outline of information technology. Article IT service management does not address the Operations part of IT. Neither does it address all the Practices, Standards, Frameworks, Activities, Behaviours, Tools & Techniques listed in my article. If you delete this article you will destroy the start of a Master Index for Wikipedia in IT Service Management & Operations. I have updated the article to specify that it is a Global Index so that this article does not duplicate existing articles and added the required categories. I should be grateful if you could kindly consider approval of the article please. Respectfully yours, Perry.
You may check my LinkedIn profile at:
www
— Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryRamen ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I have implemented all your recommendations. I have also explained to you how this article is different from other articles that you have mentioned in the sense that it is a Global Index for IT Service Management & Operations. I have also explained to you that this article is not a duplicate of existing articles and that such a Global Index for IT Service Management & Operations was missing from Wikipedia. I am building this article in favour of Wikipedia. Having worked in IT for over 20 years, I have a holistic view of IT Service Management & Operations. I was myself lost before sometimes when looking for information due to the fact that there was not a central Index listing all the IT best practices, standards, guidelines, methodologies, frameworks, concepts, approaches, behaviours, techniques & tools on the web. This page is the Global Index that was missing and will be most beneficial to the community and Wikipedia. If you take a look at column "References & Links" of table "IT Practices/Processes/Functions/Activities", you will be able to see how many items do not have a link yet. These are separate articles that are yet to be written and developed on wikipedia. The table shows you at a glance what areas of IT have and don't have articles yet. I am working with and for Wikipedia by building and maintaining this page and I bring all my experience in IT to wikipedia. I will maintain the page and make it the Best Global Index in IT Service Management & Operations on the web. Please rest assured that you can rely on me. I should be grateful if you could kindly consider approval of the article please. Is it possible for me to have a status update from your side accordingly please? Respectfully yours, Perry.
LinkedIn profile at:
www
Hello, I have been trying to explain to you that this article is not a guidebook or textbook but a Global Index.
You may proceed with the deletion of the article if you think that its not worthy.
Kind Regards
Perry — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryRamen ( talk • contribs) 07:07, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I should be grateful if you could kindly delete the page please. Thank you very much. Perry Ramen. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
PerryRamen (
talk •
contribs)
23:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus that this list fails WP:NLIST. Just Chilling ( talk) 14:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
WP:LISTCRUFT, fails WP:NLIST and cricket guidelines. Störm (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Userfication can be requested at WP:REFUND or elsewhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
WP:LISTCRUFT, fails WP:NLIST and cricket guidelines. Störm (talk) 11:43, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Userfication can be requested at WP:REFUND or elsewhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
WP:LISTCRUFT, fails WP:NLIST. Störm (talk) 11:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Alexander Windsor, Earl of Ulster. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 12:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
User:Surtsicna rationale: She is not notable as a physician. She does no royal work, so she is not notable as such either. She is just not notable at all. The sources cited here confirm that. Boldly redirecting to the article about her husband Pelmeen10 ( talk) 11:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per Uncle G's comment. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 17:17, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Tone 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Subject is an attorney who does not meet notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Article cites several sources, but almost all only mention subject in passing, or quote the subject in an article about someone or something else. Editor(s) with a conflict of interest have created suggested edits in the talk page that include an additional 98 references, but again I can't find any that are about the subject; all are about other people, court cases, etc., with the subject quoted or mentioned. Paisarepa ( talk) 06:42, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article seems to be written like an advertisement. The subject alone doesn't seem to be notable either to separate it from the Commodore 64 article. I found a few reliable sources upon a quick Google search on the Commodore 64 homebrew scene but I don't think it's enough coverage to establish general notability and it's only worthy of a short sub-section in its parent subject's article at best. letcreate123 ( talk) 05:27, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Fenix down ( talk) 06:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Cannot find significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Search results turning up brief mentions and routine reports [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23]. Player is apparently retired now and a youth coach. [24] [25]. Not to be confused with other people with the same name, including an Irish footballer born in 1994 [26] [27] [28]. – Leviv ich 05:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:N at it's present state. Feickus ( talk) 04:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
An academic event which 100 people attended does not seem notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article. This seems to fail WP:NEWSEVENT. Marquardtika ( talk) 14:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Article is about a casualty of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. The subject fails WP:N and WP:SOLDIER. Feickus ( talk) 04:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. The arguments by Hunter Kahn do not address the uncontested substantive problems with the article. Deleting unsalvageable promotional content in order to allow a neutral rewrite is standard practice. Sandstein 08:53, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
highly promotional article , though on a worthy product. Almost all the article is devoted to the problems it hopes to solve, rather than the ostensible subject of the article. It needs complete rewriting, and the first step for that is to remove the existing PR-based article DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:05, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
per WP:BIO1E and WP:BARE, just a little notable for only one event in 2008 and nothing then, his role in 2011 revolution is not notable nor memorable, just few articles from his mates describe him as "leader" and that is exaggeration and no one knows what is his exactly role, he has no awards nor political positions too. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 00:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:09, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Not notable; searching online reveals no new work or news for sometime. Books are largely self published, and most references are his own social media accounts or lead to blank pages ie. MENA Water Resources World Conference Bottletoppen ( talk) 15:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
The result was delete. Clear consensus that this actor fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR Just Chilling ( talk) 00:40, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
No significant roles in notable films (his biggest role was in 8ish, which has dubious notability). Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 00:07, 13 July 2019 (UTC)