![]() |
The result was delete. However if anyone is able to confirm that enough of the print/unavailable sources are in-depth reliable sources, such that the article would pass GNG, come to my talk page and link this AfD and I'll restore. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Entirely unsourced stub article created in 2008 with 29 edits since. -- Alex TW 02:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Little significant coverage in independent, reliable sources that suggests a pass of WP:NCORP. DrStrauss talk 10:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
From what I can tell, this is a clear fail of WP:NCORP. The references provided are mostly about one of the products of Netgables ( Saralweb), and personal profiles of its investors. I find no substantial coverage of Netgables itself, hence delete. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 21:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Can't find any in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable sources. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 18:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.
The result was delete. Redirects at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable model lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. Fails WP:N. reddogsix ( talk) 21:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Shirt58. ( non-admin closure) Sir Sputnik ( talk) 13:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Concern was player fails both WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG having never played in a fully professional league or in a senior international fixture. PROD was removed by article creator on the grounds that he may become the second choice goalkeeper if a loan spell ends for another player and may play in cup competitions, which is purely WP:CRYSTAL and does not solve original reason for deletion. Kosack ( talk) 21:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Unextraordinary logistics company with no discernible third-party coverage not emanating from its own press releases. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Declined PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO notability. References are trivial tabloid coverage, no major accomplishments to warrant an encyclopedia article. --Animalparty! ( talk) 18:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm8338319/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/naked-dating-contestant-yasmin-scott-11085146
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/sydney-confidential/raunching-naked-dating-couple-told-we-are-not-allowed-to-broadcast-sex/news-story/586f54b73db43fddf0ede33e8ff37a79
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/real-life/641169/KIIS-FM-Naked-date-boobs-touch-video-kyle-jackie-o-kiss-sex
--
Rashkeqamar (
talk)
19:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
http://www.adventurefittravel.com/radio/item/657-72-yasmin-scott
Independent sources indicate she is a rising star from Australian porn industry.--
Rashkeqamar (
talk) 11:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Struck third keep vote from this editor
Atlantic306 (
talk)
22:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus (no prejudice against renomination). Essentially, those wanting to delete the article (aside from A Train) did not discuss the sources or mention searches for any other, merely saying "not notable" or "churn", while those wanting to keep mentioned sources. Additionally, nobody has edited the article during the AfD, which may have helped other voters come to a decision. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
non notable and promotional. The awards are in niche categories, the references are PR or notices. DGG ( talk ) 23:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kolkata Knight Riders. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 17:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Procedural nomination. Previous AFD on this article was speedily closed because it was opened as an act of vandalism by a now indef-blocked user. However, X2bechaos ( talk · contribs) prodded the article in good faith with the rationale "The following article is more that just a stub. Kolkata Knight Riders already has a Wikipedia page, and this new page is unnecessary. The teams of the IPL have a page for each season, though the 2018 season hasn't started which renders this page useless. On top of that, the formatting and grammar is off on this page."
I'm bringing it back here for a proper discussion. For my part, I am neutral. — KuyaBriBri Talk 18:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable minor league player. The references on the page are either not independent as they are put out by us college hockey whom he played for or are routine coverage of signings. Could not find anything doing a search that went into significant detail on the player other than the one source already in the article but multiple are required so fails WP:GNG. Also fails WP:NHOCKEY. DJSasso ( talk) 18:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page for an unremarkable charity. Significant RS coverage not found. The first AfD in 2016 closed as no consensus, due to low participation. The following sources were presented at the AfD: "significant coverage in The Glasgow Herald [9] and The Daily Telegraph [10]." I do not find them convincing as both articles are based on interviews with the org's executives. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:39, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A Train talk 08:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO and mayor pro tem of Greenville, North Carolina doesn't satisfy WP:POLITICIAN. Clarityfiend ( talk) 06:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I think that the article on William J. Hadden should stand as it is. Rev. Hadden was a noted local politician and citizen in Greenville, North Carolina, during a time of great social and racial upset and change in the 1960s and 1970s. While many white southern ministers, priests and rabbis were instrumental in ending local segregation and racial discrimination, their contributions are often not recognized or documented, especially on Wikipedia. There are many outside sources of information about Rev. Hadden and his life, but because they were mostly pre-Internet, it is difficult to identify him. However, his actions and accomplishments are readily mentioned in a number of books, newspapers and local publications, and these some of these are found on the Internet as well. The article counts 16 independent references to his life and actions, which is a comfortable amount of references of historical and current interest and notability, and thus cumulatively show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". Finally, Rev. Hadden was active in many fields, being at the same time a minister, local politician, television presenter and a community leader. It is difficult to confine his contributions to only one field, but his combined accomplishments resound in several different ones. He is a significant and notable person of interest to 20th century life in Eastern North Carolina, and a worthy addition to Wikpedia. Hadden ( talk) 19:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. A Train talk 08:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON. No indication as to whether the film will gather any lasting notability due to it not being made yet. Currently, it's just a plot and a cast list and is clearly here to promote the film as it comes out in 8 days. DrStrauss talk 22:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual who fails WP:NACTOR and WP:MUSICBIO. The article subject has yet to accrue the significant role(s) and cultural influence required by Wikipedia's notability standards, and has not produced any notable music. Sourcing is also an issue, as a search for the article subject does not turn up any in-depth reliable sources. SamHolt6 ( talk) 16:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
BLP about an amateur footballer who played 14 minutes in a single United Soccer League match on an academy (non-professional) contract more than one year ago. Although there is concensus that the USL is a fully-pro league, his substitute's appearance was as an amateur and we have a long-standing consensus that a very minimal amount of play such as this doesn't meet the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL. Also, although I found one decent article in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the other coverage of this footballer is routine and doesn't come close to passing WP:GNG. A PROD was removed on the grounds that the article satisfies NFOOTBALL, but I don't believe that is accurate (particularly in spirit). Jogurney ( talk) 15:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD rejected as he apparently does pass GNG but I don't think he does. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 15:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Unable to find significant coverage to meet GNG, although admittedly language could be a barrier. There is no SNG for bodybuilders but not sure placing 5th in World Fitness Federation would qualify for notability. J04n( talk page) 14:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable web series based on WWE. Wikipedia is a general purpose encyclopedia, not a collect of WWE trivia. WP:BEFORE shows nothing but internet chatter, unreliable sources and press releases. As it claims to be "considered as the flagship Internet program of WWE" it could maybe be merged with WWE. Dysklyver 21:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. nom-withdraw (non-admin closure) Dysklyver 14:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
I can't see this passing WP:GNG, this party has merged with some others in 2016, [15] so perhaps this article could be merged into something more relevant. Dysklyver 21:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Phantomsteve. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable company that fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. A search for the article subject turned up coverage, but only in sites such as Prnewswire that fail WP:RS or that only list what the article subject is and not why it is significantly notable. In short, no in depth coverage. SamHolt6 ( talk) 14:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBASKETBALL. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
... actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic."— Bagumba ( talk) 08:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Local group with local coverage, no recording contract or hits, fails WP:Band Rogermx ( talk) 20:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Little in the way of significant reviews, mostly just YouTube videos and unreliable cruft sources. DrStrauss talk 22:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
What reliable sources have written anything of substance about this organization? MrBill3 ( talk) 13:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to New Brunswick, New Jersey. North America 1000 04:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Notability for topic not established in references, which are mostly local and do not assert the notability of subject. Quick search of topic for new references does not bring back anything to show city's music scene is particularly significant. Suggest merging to main city article, if anything. CutOffTies ( talk) 22:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is about a convicted sex offender who was (shockingly) granted joint custody of his son. It is entirely WP:TOOSOON to know if this will become a case of lasting encyclopedic significance, but I highly doubt it. As it stands, this article is the perfect textbook example of WP:ONEEVENT; all of the references in the article were published within a single 48-hour window. We'll almost certainly never hear of the subject again and there's no potential for an encyclopedic article here. A Train talk 10:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No evidence of notability per WP:NFILM. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madlib. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Per source searches, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 07:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, as per source searches. North America 1000 07:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jeez, what a mess. The sole registered user arguing to keep,
ProfessorClaudele does not understand
WP:NFILM. However, neither does the nominator,
Shearonink, who is attempting to rebut arguments with stuff like the Christianity Today review...that was a 2-star review out of a possible 4
. The critical reception of a film has no bearing on its notability, or else we wouldn't have an article for
The Happening. However, there are enough regulars agreeing with some of the deletion argument to form a consensus.
ProfessorClaudele, just because there does not appear to be a consensus to keep this article doesn't mean that you can't merge the most significant information to Aimee_Semple_McPherson#Works_about_McPherson to support a short-but-meaty paragraph over there. If you would like me to reproduce the article into your userspace to facilitate that just let me know. A Train talk 08:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM. Fails WP:NFOE (*was not widely distributed, *has not received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics, *not historically notable [no publication of at least two non-trivial articles 5 years after release], *has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking, etc.). Fails WP:NFSOURCES (no significant coverage). Shearonink ( talk) 03:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Do not Delete Was distributed widely in (Partial list) Blockbuster stores, on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Netflix under new title "Sister Aimee: The Aimee Semple McPherson Story" Has been mentioned in mainstream newspapers more than other films with articles on Wikipedia. It is the first feature dramatic article on a major historical figure in Pentecostalism.
Do not Delete
It was reviewed in the Moviehound Golden Retriever Movie book, in Charisma and Christianity Today leading magazines in the Christian world, and on Hollywood Jesus. Religious discrimination should not be a factor in deleting a film that is more notable than many others in Wikipedia. The film is the first dramatic film about a woman who pioneered her own denomination and was a major Hollywood and religious figure in the 20th century in Los Angeles. The following articles in the press (partial list)mention the film:
East Valley Tribune:
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/get_out/finding-sister-aimee/article_22e6445a-2158-54db-a716-d79178c7df9d.html
Pittsburgh Post Gazette:
http://www.post-gazette.com/ae/movies/2008/05/04/Rev-Rossi-back-in-news-as-Hollywood-success-story/stories/200805040255
The film was nominated for Best Feature in Milan, Italy at the Sabaoth Film Festival.
Thanks, Professor Claudele. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ProfessorClaudele (
talk •
contribs)
06:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment:
Comment: Shearonink (UTC) negates her own flawed arguments for deletion by contradictory statements. For example, in her first post she argues that the film "was not widely distributed." When this falsehood was refuted with information that the film was distributed on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Netflix, etc... she argues the opposite point in her second post above that being widely distributed "means nothing." And then adds that the film was distributed on DVD on Netflix, but not streaming? Seriously? A second example of the self-contradictory logic in this request is in her first post she cites a lack of reviews. Then when reviews are presented, she replies that Christianity Today's review was "two stars out of four." So the standard is always altered in favor of a confirmation bias towards deletion, rather than an internal consistency of argument with objectivity. A third example of the flawed and inconsistent logic is when her first post mentions a lack of articles from notable newspapers, when articles are cited, she says, yes but the article covers Rossi and mentions the film without focusing exclusively on the film. To any objective observer, one can see the lines are drawn then erased and redrawn. Above a false claim is made that "The Disappearance of Aimee" was the first film of Aimee Semple McPherson's life, which was a TV presentation focused solely on the dramatization of the 1927 morals trial of McPherson. Rossi's film is the first feature biographical film covering her entire life from 1912-1944. Do not Delete Additionally, Wikipedia rules governing deletion state clearly: The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following: Point 3 The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release. The screening at Milan film festival Saboath was in 2011, 5 years after its release. Link: http://celebritypictures.wiki/celebrity/744302/748408 The question is asked if Backstage has reported on the film. The article on the film itself has a link to a Backstage article that talks about the film and Rossi's artistic integrity in refusing money to alter the truth of his film.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfessorClaudele ( talk • contribs) 08:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
The SAG screening was not just a screening of a film at their theater. It was chosen to be part of that years SAG Conversations for notable films and actors. From SAG website: "The Conversations program offers free screenings followed by inspiring Q&As with leading actors and casts, as well as Career Retrospectives with preeminent actors who explore the process and profession with an audience of fellow artists. Conversations focus on personal experiences and artistic influences that inform and shape careers; discuss current and past projects; share valuable insights into the craft and industry; and preserve creative legacies." Here is a link to that event, SAG Conversations honoring the film with not just a screening, but a discussion by the filmmaker and some cast and crew taking questions from the audience of SAG union members: https://members.sagfoundation.org/events/550 ProfessorClaudele ( talk) 06:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
No COI, I do follow Mr. Rossi's work and story as a native Pittsburgher who finds it interesting as a life trajectory of someone native to my hometown. I wouldn't want to stoop to accusations of COI on the other side, but this thread does seem to set up arbitrary judgments against this film, then when it is demonstrated the film meets the criteria the interpretation of the rules are modified in subsequent posts as has been mentioned before and the criteria changed. The application does seem to be slanted unfairly with a COI against Rossi and the film, by those trying to delete. Most recently 'God's Generals' is cited as an important Pentecostal film, which has unlike Rossi's film, not screened anywhere, not been reviewed, and is a a video of a disgraced minister who was found to be sexually involved with a young male youth worker, just talking into the camera as a talking head about people like Aimee Semple McPherson, and is not a feature dramatic film anywhere near Rossi's work from any objective measure. 76.175.21.114 ( talk) 23:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to William Guilfoyle. (non-admin closure) f e minist 12:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
A7 declined, which is reasonable, but this article nonetheless provides no basis for notability outside of the local vicinity. CapitalSasha ~ talk 05:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Redirects to SNH48 keep getting deleted. This is basically a list of names, nothing more, of members of a subgroup. Most of the references are to the subgroup's website, the rest is promotional chatter like this. Drmies ( talk) 02:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy G.12. (non-admin closure) FITINDIA 03:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources and the page currently has no references. Meatsgains ( talk) 01:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 15:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH, as per source searches. North America 1000 01:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 15:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Source searches are not providing adequate reliable sources and significant coverage to qualify an article, as per WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 01:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rebstar. (non-admin closure) f e minist 12:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Per source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 01:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Bobherry Talk Edits 14:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
This page should be deleted for the simple reason that he is not notable enough. Of the few sources on this article, two are from Dore's own media, one doesn't exist, and two are very minor, irrelevant mentions, neither of which are relevant sources to the parts of the article that are being sourced. KingForPA ( talk) 12:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was delete. However if anyone is able to confirm that enough of the print/unavailable sources are in-depth reliable sources, such that the article would pass GNG, come to my talk page and link this AfD and I'll restore. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Entirely unsourced stub article created in 2008 with 29 edits since. -- Alex TW 02:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:08, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Little significant coverage in independent, reliable sources that suggests a pass of WP:NCORP. DrStrauss talk 10:16, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
From what I can tell, this is a clear fail of WP:NCORP. The references provided are mostly about one of the products of Netgables ( Saralweb), and personal profiles of its investors. I find no substantial coverage of Netgables itself, hence delete. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 21:56, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Can't find any in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable sources. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 18:53, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material.
The result was delete. Redirects at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable model lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. Fails WP:N. reddogsix ( talk) 21:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by Shirt58. ( non-admin closure) Sir Sputnik ( talk) 13:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Concern was player fails both WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG having never played in a fully professional league or in a senior international fixture. PROD was removed by article creator on the grounds that he may become the second choice goalkeeper if a loan spell ends for another player and may play in cup competitions, which is purely WP:CRYSTAL and does not solve original reason for deletion. Kosack ( talk) 21:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:11, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. Unextraordinary logistics company with no discernible third-party coverage not emanating from its own press releases. Julietdeltalima (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 06:02, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Declined PROD. Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO notability. References are trivial tabloid coverage, no major accomplishments to warrant an encyclopedia article. --Animalparty! ( talk) 18:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm8338319/
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/naked-dating-contestant-yasmin-scott-11085146
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/entertainment/sydney-confidential/raunching-naked-dating-couple-told-we-are-not-allowed-to-broadcast-sex/news-story/586f54b73db43fddf0ede33e8ff37a79
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/real-life/641169/KIIS-FM-Naked-date-boobs-touch-video-kyle-jackie-o-kiss-sex
--
Rashkeqamar (
talk)
19:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
http://www.adventurefittravel.com/radio/item/657-72-yasmin-scott
Independent sources indicate she is a rising star from Australian porn industry.--
Rashkeqamar (
talk) 11:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC) Struck third keep vote from this editor
Atlantic306 (
talk)
22:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus (no prejudice against renomination). Essentially, those wanting to delete the article (aside from A Train) did not discuss the sources or mention searches for any other, merely saying "not notable" or "churn", while those wanting to keep mentioned sources. Additionally, nobody has edited the article during the AfD, which may have helped other voters come to a decision. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
non notable and promotional. The awards are in niche categories, the references are PR or notices. DGG ( talk ) 23:41, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Kolkata Knight Riders. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 17:40, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Procedural nomination. Previous AFD on this article was speedily closed because it was opened as an act of vandalism by a now indef-blocked user. However, X2bechaos ( talk · contribs) prodded the article in good faith with the rationale "The following article is more that just a stub. Kolkata Knight Riders already has a Wikipedia page, and this new page is unnecessary. The teams of the IPL have a page for each season, though the 2018 season hasn't started which renders this page useless. On top of that, the formatting and grammar is off on this page."
I'm bringing it back here for a proper discussion. For my part, I am neutral. — KuyaBriBri Talk 18:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable minor league player. The references on the page are either not independent as they are put out by us college hockey whom he played for or are routine coverage of signings. Could not find anything doing a search that went into significant detail on the player other than the one source already in the article but multiple are required so fails WP:GNG. Also fails WP:NHOCKEY. DJSasso ( talk) 18:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page for an unremarkable charity. Significant RS coverage not found. The first AfD in 2016 closed as no consensus, due to low participation. The following sources were presented at the AfD: "significant coverage in The Glasgow Herald [9] and The Daily Telegraph [10]." I do not find them convincing as both articles are based on interviews with the org's executives. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:39, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. A Train talk 08:52, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO and mayor pro tem of Greenville, North Carolina doesn't satisfy WP:POLITICIAN. Clarityfiend ( talk) 06:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I think that the article on William J. Hadden should stand as it is. Rev. Hadden was a noted local politician and citizen in Greenville, North Carolina, during a time of great social and racial upset and change in the 1960s and 1970s. While many white southern ministers, priests and rabbis were instrumental in ending local segregation and racial discrimination, their contributions are often not recognized or documented, especially on Wikipedia. There are many outside sources of information about Rev. Hadden and his life, but because they were mostly pre-Internet, it is difficult to identify him. However, his actions and accomplishments are readily mentioned in a number of books, newspapers and local publications, and these some of these are found on the Internet as well. The article counts 16 independent references to his life and actions, which is a comfortable amount of references of historical and current interest and notability, and thus cumulatively show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article". Finally, Rev. Hadden was active in many fields, being at the same time a minister, local politician, television presenter and a community leader. It is difficult to confine his contributions to only one field, but his combined accomplishments resound in several different ones. He is a significant and notable person of interest to 20th century life in Eastern North Carolina, and a worthy addition to Wikpedia. Hadden ( talk) 19:15, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. A Train talk 08:51, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
WP:TOOSOON. No indication as to whether the film will gather any lasting notability due to it not being made yet. Currently, it's just a plot and a cast list and is clearly here to promote the film as it comes out in 8 days. DrStrauss talk 22:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable individual who fails WP:NACTOR and WP:MUSICBIO. The article subject has yet to accrue the significant role(s) and cultural influence required by Wikipedia's notability standards, and has not produced any notable music. Sourcing is also an issue, as a search for the article subject does not turn up any in-depth reliable sources. SamHolt6 ( talk) 16:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. apparent consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
BLP about an amateur footballer who played 14 minutes in a single United Soccer League match on an academy (non-professional) contract more than one year ago. Although there is concensus that the USL is a fully-pro league, his substitute's appearance was as an amateur and we have a long-standing consensus that a very minimal amount of play such as this doesn't meet the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL. Also, although I found one decent article in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the other coverage of this footballer is routine and doesn't come close to passing WP:GNG. A PROD was removed on the grounds that the article satisfies NFOOTBALL, but I don't believe that is accurate (particularly in spirit). Jogurney ( talk) 15:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. PROD rejected as he apparently does pass GNG but I don't think he does. ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 15:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Unable to find significant coverage to meet GNG, although admittedly language could be a barrier. There is no SNG for bodybuilders but not sure placing 5th in World Fitness Federation would qualify for notability. J04n( talk page) 14:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be a non-notable web series based on WWE. Wikipedia is a general purpose encyclopedia, not a collect of WWE trivia. WP:BEFORE shows nothing but internet chatter, unreliable sources and press releases. As it claims to be "considered as the flagship Internet program of WWE" it could maybe be merged with WWE. Dysklyver 21:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. nom-withdraw (non-admin closure) Dysklyver 14:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
I can't see this passing WP:GNG, this party has merged with some others in 2016, [15] so perhaps this article could be merged into something more relevant. Dysklyver 21:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Phantomsteve. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Seemingly non-notable company that fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. A search for the article subject turned up coverage, but only in sites such as Prnewswire that fail WP:RS or that only list what the article subject is and not why it is significantly notable. In short, no in depth coverage. SamHolt6 ( talk) 14:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:19, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NBASKETBALL. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
... actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic."— Bagumba ( talk) 08:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Local group with local coverage, no recording contract or hits, fails WP:Band Rogermx ( talk) 20:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Little in the way of significant reviews, mostly just YouTube videos and unreliable cruft sources. DrStrauss talk 22:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was keep. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
What reliable sources have written anything of substance about this organization? MrBill3 ( talk) 13:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to New Brunswick, New Jersey. North America 1000 04:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Notability for topic not established in references, which are mostly local and do not assert the notability of subject. Quick search of topic for new references does not bring back anything to show city's music scene is particularly significant. Suggest merging to main city article, if anything. CutOffTies ( talk) 22:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
This article is about a convicted sex offender who was (shockingly) granted joint custody of his son. It is entirely WP:TOOSOON to know if this will become a case of lasting encyclopedic significance, but I highly doubt it. As it stands, this article is the perfect textbook example of WP:ONEEVENT; all of the references in the article were published within a single 48-hour window. We'll almost certainly never hear of the subject again and there's no potential for an encyclopedic article here. A Train talk 10:39, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:17, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No evidence of notability per WP:NFILM. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Madlib. (non-admin closure) f e minist 13:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Per source searches, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 07:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:12, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, as per source searches. North America 1000 07:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jeez, what a mess. The sole registered user arguing to keep,
ProfessorClaudele does not understand
WP:NFILM. However, neither does the nominator,
Shearonink, who is attempting to rebut arguments with stuff like the Christianity Today review...that was a 2-star review out of a possible 4
. The critical reception of a film has no bearing on its notability, or else we wouldn't have an article for
The Happening. However, there are enough regulars agreeing with some of the deletion argument to form a consensus.
ProfessorClaudele, just because there does not appear to be a consensus to keep this article doesn't mean that you can't merge the most significant information to Aimee_Semple_McPherson#Works_about_McPherson to support a short-but-meaty paragraph over there. If you would like me to reproduce the article into your userspace to facilitate that just let me know. A Train talk 08:50, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFILM. Fails WP:NFOE (*was not widely distributed, *has not received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics, *not historically notable [no publication of at least two non-trivial articles 5 years after release], *has not received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking, etc.). Fails WP:NFSOURCES (no significant coverage). Shearonink ( talk) 03:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Do not Delete Was distributed widely in (Partial list) Blockbuster stores, on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Netflix under new title "Sister Aimee: The Aimee Semple McPherson Story" Has been mentioned in mainstream newspapers more than other films with articles on Wikipedia. It is the first feature dramatic article on a major historical figure in Pentecostalism.
Do not Delete
It was reviewed in the Moviehound Golden Retriever Movie book, in Charisma and Christianity Today leading magazines in the Christian world, and on Hollywood Jesus. Religious discrimination should not be a factor in deleting a film that is more notable than many others in Wikipedia. The film is the first dramatic film about a woman who pioneered her own denomination and was a major Hollywood and religious figure in the 20th century in Los Angeles. The following articles in the press (partial list)mention the film:
East Valley Tribune:
http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/get_out/finding-sister-aimee/article_22e6445a-2158-54db-a716-d79178c7df9d.html
Pittsburgh Post Gazette:
http://www.post-gazette.com/ae/movies/2008/05/04/Rev-Rossi-back-in-news-as-Hollywood-success-story/stories/200805040255
The film was nominated for Best Feature in Milan, Italy at the Sabaoth Film Festival.
Thanks, Professor Claudele. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
ProfessorClaudele (
talk •
contribs)
06:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Comment:
Comment: Shearonink (UTC) negates her own flawed arguments for deletion by contradictory statements. For example, in her first post she argues that the film "was not widely distributed." When this falsehood was refuted with information that the film was distributed on Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Netflix, etc... she argues the opposite point in her second post above that being widely distributed "means nothing." And then adds that the film was distributed on DVD on Netflix, but not streaming? Seriously? A second example of the self-contradictory logic in this request is in her first post she cites a lack of reviews. Then when reviews are presented, she replies that Christianity Today's review was "two stars out of four." So the standard is always altered in favor of a confirmation bias towards deletion, rather than an internal consistency of argument with objectivity. A third example of the flawed and inconsistent logic is when her first post mentions a lack of articles from notable newspapers, when articles are cited, she says, yes but the article covers Rossi and mentions the film without focusing exclusively on the film. To any objective observer, one can see the lines are drawn then erased and redrawn. Above a false claim is made that "The Disappearance of Aimee" was the first film of Aimee Semple McPherson's life, which was a TV presentation focused solely on the dramatization of the 1927 morals trial of McPherson. Rossi's film is the first feature biographical film covering her entire life from 1912-1944. Do not Delete Additionally, Wikipedia rules governing deletion state clearly: The film is historically notable, as evidenced by one or more of the following: Point 3 The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release. The screening at Milan film festival Saboath was in 2011, 5 years after its release. Link: http://celebritypictures.wiki/celebrity/744302/748408 The question is asked if Backstage has reported on the film. The article on the film itself has a link to a Backstage article that talks about the film and Rossi's artistic integrity in refusing money to alter the truth of his film.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfessorClaudele ( talk • contribs) 08:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
The SAG screening was not just a screening of a film at their theater. It was chosen to be part of that years SAG Conversations for notable films and actors. From SAG website: "The Conversations program offers free screenings followed by inspiring Q&As with leading actors and casts, as well as Career Retrospectives with preeminent actors who explore the process and profession with an audience of fellow artists. Conversations focus on personal experiences and artistic influences that inform and shape careers; discuss current and past projects; share valuable insights into the craft and industry; and preserve creative legacies." Here is a link to that event, SAG Conversations honoring the film with not just a screening, but a discussion by the filmmaker and some cast and crew taking questions from the audience of SAG union members: https://members.sagfoundation.org/events/550 ProfessorClaudele ( talk) 06:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
No COI, I do follow Mr. Rossi's work and story as a native Pittsburgher who finds it interesting as a life trajectory of someone native to my hometown. I wouldn't want to stoop to accusations of COI on the other side, but this thread does seem to set up arbitrary judgments against this film, then when it is demonstrated the film meets the criteria the interpretation of the rules are modified in subsequent posts as has been mentioned before and the criteria changed. The application does seem to be slanted unfairly with a COI against Rossi and the film, by those trying to delete. Most recently 'God's Generals' is cited as an important Pentecostal film, which has unlike Rossi's film, not screened anywhere, not been reviewed, and is a a video of a disgraced minister who was found to be sexually involved with a young male youth worker, just talking into the camera as a talking head about people like Aimee Semple McPherson, and is not a feature dramatic film anywhere near Rossi's work from any objective measure. 76.175.21.114 ( talk) 23:13, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to William Guilfoyle. (non-admin closure) f e minist 12:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
A7 declined, which is reasonable, but this article nonetheless provides no basis for notability outside of the local vicinity. CapitalSasha ~ talk 05:18, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:17, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
Redirects to SNH48 keep getting deleted. This is basically a list of names, nothing more, of members of a subgroup. Most of the references are to the subgroup's website, the rest is promotional chatter like this. Drmies ( talk) 02:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy G.12. (non-admin closure) FITINDIA 03:46, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources and the page currently has no references. Meatsgains ( talk) 01:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 15:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH, as per source searches. North America 1000 01:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe ( t / c) 15:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Source searches are not providing adequate reliable sources and significant coverage to qualify an article, as per WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 01:17, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Rebstar. (non-admin closure) f e minist 12:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Per source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America 1000 01:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Bobherry Talk Edits 14:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
This page should be deleted for the simple reason that he is not notable enough. Of the few sources on this article, two are from Dore's own media, one doesn't exist, and two are very minor, irrelevant mentions, neither of which are relevant sources to the parts of the article that are being sourced. KingForPA ( talk) 12:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)