The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Minimally sourced biography of a person notable primarily as the (lord) mayor of a small town. The town is not large enough to hand its (lord) mayors an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NPOL, and the article is not reliably sourced well enough to media coverage about him to get over the "who have received significant press coverage" part of our inclusion criteria for local officeholders -- the only source actually present here is a brief namecheck of his existence in a very general history of why this town gets to call its mayors "lord mayor". (And just for the record, it's not for the reasons why a British mayor would get that title.) Politicians at the local level, especially in small towns, don't automatically qualify for articles just because they can be nominally verified as existing; they need to be demonstrated and sourced as significantly more notable than the norm, but nothing here does that.
There's also a conflict of interest here — I won't go into precise detail so I don't out anyone, but I have been able to confirm that Goring did have relatives whose surname corresponds neatly to the usernames of both the article creator and the person who uploaded the "scanned from a family photo album" image in the infobox. (And then after writing that I discovered that the creator openly states the family relationship to Goring right on their own userpage. Leave it to me to make a one-step job five times harder than it needs to be!) Bearcat ( talk) 23:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced (except for IMDb, which is not a reliable source) biography of a musician, whose only claim of notability is having been in an Elvis Presley film -- in a role so minor that his "character name" in the IMDb profile is literally, I'm not even kidding, "Minor role". As always, every person in every film does not get an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing, and neither does every musician -- he must be the subject of enough reliable source coverage about him in media to clear WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 23:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 16:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
WP:AUTOBIO of a musician and publisher, making no particularly strong claim of notability for either endeavour and referenced to no reliable source coverage: the only references here are a primary source and two blog entries, not substantive coverage in real media. And even if his notability could be properly demonstrated, conflict of interest says he doesn't get to write the article himself. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody other than the subject himself can write and source an article properly, but nothing here is good enough. Bearcat ( talk) 23:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. All uninvolved editors agreed. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:55, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable software, a Google search did not reveal any independent in-depth coverage. None of the 16 used sources (2 are duplicates) qualifies as a fully independent reliable source with in-depth coverage (I'll add a detailed source review below). A possible "conflict of interest" hasn't been clarified and disclosed yet. GermanJoe ( talk) 12:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
A more detailed review of the used sources (reference numbering as of now, may change):
In short: a lot of PR activities and professional marketing, but nothing to establish notability. GermanJoe ( talk) 12:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Updated from July, 24 by Techforcatch
Even though the references are self-published, they were approved by our customers. The references were updated by reducing the number of mentions to one.
Ref #4 is the link to the article in the group of project management professionals. Here’s the part of it, if you lack access to this group. The article shows that Flow MPM, an earlier version of Epicflow, helped Pilz Netherlands win National Business Success 2015 Award. LinkedIn members can get access to this group. https://www.dropbox.com/s/tv56mbcoantrzat/Screenshot%202017-07-24%2019.19.59.png?dl=0
Ref#7 is a success story, based on the benefits Epicflow’s real clients get after using the software for three months.
StartUs Magazine is an independent source. The article was autonomously written by Daniel Tanque after the Web Summit 2016, Lisbon. It does not include any advertising material, rather spreads the news about the release of a project management tool, pointing to its unique features that have not been developed before.
Ref #9 (an article about Epicflow and MS Project) was approved by an independent editor of Project Accelerator with no costs spent for publishing.
The content was written independently by Finances Online expert, after crediting Epicflow with two awards without pursuing any marketing goals.
Refs #11 and 12 prove scientific PM expertise of our researchers - Jan Willem Tromp and Albert Ponsteen. These are publications in Procedia, a reliable scientific source with peer-reviews under the responsibility of Scientific Committee of IPMA 2014.
The article was approved by an independent editor from Project-Management.com. Our researcher’s expertise in this domain has already been shown above, as he contributed to a reliable scientific journal under responsibility of Scientific Committee of IPMA 2014.
Ref #15 was updated.
Refs #16 and 17 were updated.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Techforcatch ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG with only WP:ROUTINE sources from the Las Vegas area and the primary tenant, the Vegas Golden Knights. Could be integrated/merged into the Team information section of the Golden Knights' article but at this point because of the WP:RECENTISM it appears to just be WP:TOOSOON. Yosemiter ( talk) 22:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:51, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
He fails WP:NPOL and seems to fail harder WP:GNG too. Greenbörg (talk) 06:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Not a particularly notable company, fails WP:CORP. Most sources cited are from the company itself, and those that are not only mention the company in passing and as such fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Also note this page has been speedy deleted under A7 several times in the deletion log. SamHolt6 ( talk) 13:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Most of these references (soundcloud, aquasound, etc.) are not references to independent sources, they are links to where music can be heard or to promotional material for the subject. No substantive discussion in reliable independent secondary published sources. KDS4444 ( talk) 07:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Greenbörg (talk) 06:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 16:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Greenbörg (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 08:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Biography, formatted and sourced like a genealogy rather than an encyclopedia article, about a person whose strongest discernible claim of notability is that he lived in the looming shadow of war (which in the 1600s, who didn't?) Nothing here passes any subject-specific inclusion standard, and none of the sourcing counts toward WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 21:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 16:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person and fails Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Oswald Foundation. The target's notability can be discussed separately but does not impede a merge close here So Why 15:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Lots of references and superficially impressive, but am struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage. Fails WP:BIO. Edwardx ( talk) 20:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Definitely many references that I reduced. Consider merging with Oswald Foundation? 182.69.63.72 ( talk)
The result was delete. The redirect of this page to Lissi und der wilde Kaiser can be re-performed if desired. North America 1000 00:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable web star. Absolutely no secondary or tertiary sources. Zhangj1079 ( T| C) 19:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Note that the consensus here is clearly for deletion (i.e. it's G4-eligible), but it's also a major copyright violation so it's being deleted officially as WP:G12. Primefac ( talk) 14:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
No reliable sources found and no mentions or independent articles from GNEWS. It's a case of WP:TOOSOON Zazzysa ( talk) 19:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page for a student theatre society. Significant RS coverage to meet WP:NORG not found; what comes is PR-driven or trivial mentions. Proposing either a Delete or a Redirect to University of New South Wales. Previous AfDs closed as Keep (2005) and Delete (2007). K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 15:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage. Fails WP:BIO. Edwardx ( talk) 19:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Mz7 ( talk) 06:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
None of the references appear to discuss this specific model; V-Model (software development) is a separate article. Massive amounts of unsourced material that are possibly original research. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Neither 'reference' appear to mention his name and I'm not finding anything on Google. Derek Andrews ( talk) 18:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 18:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTMANUAL, also WP:NOTWEBHOST. — Cahk ( talk) 17:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
An earlier incarnation of this article was AfD'd just over 12 months ago with the general consensus being that it was too soon for this young DJ to pass notability standards. I submit that it may well still be too soon. While there are plenty of links, these are to the tracks themselves, rather than to the depth and breadth of coverage required by NMUSIC/GNG. He's still very much an up-and-comer, but what I can see suggests he's not quite there yet. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
I redirected this article because I could not identify sources which were not either primary or non-regional according to WP:N/ WP:NORG. My redirect was contested. I continue to hold the belief that an examination of the sources will show that the sources are indeed low quality, so I am submitting this article to AFD. Izno ( talk) 16:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 15:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article redirected during a WP:PROD only be restarted by another editor. No evidence of notability Ajf773 ( talk) 23:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Foundry (band). So Why 15:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Sources given are press releases and/or only mention the subject in conjunction with the band Foundry. Notability is not inherited by association. Google searches revealed some stand alone coverage in self-published or related sources such as corporate profiles or other online communities. However, insufficient to establish WP:INDY, WP:N and WP:SOURCE pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus that this is really WP:TOOSOON. So Why 16:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:TOOSOON. Sports season that is still two years away. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep: although it is two years away, the arrival of Porsche and Mercedes is significant. Porsche will discontinue the Porsche 919 Hybrid project—which uses hybrid technology—from the World Endurance Championship; with Audi having already left, Toyota is the only manufacturer in the WEC, so the full consequences of Porsche's defection to Formula E remain to be seen. Likewise, Mercedes compete in Formula 1, which also uses hybrid technology, and while they are committed to the series (for now), their announcement comes at a time when Formula 1 is negotiating the 2021 engine regulations. All of this has triggered a wider discussion about what the future of motorsport is going to look like as Formula E is becoming manufacters' preferred test bed, especially in light of announcements from the French and British governments that they will ban cars with combustion engines in the next few decades. The bottom line is that while it might be very early to create the article, it's incredibly significant in the context of global motorsport. As a precedent, the 2014 Formula One season article was created two years in advance of the season as the regulation changes that were introduced for 2014 were a massive overhaul of the engine formula. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 03:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America 1000 00:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
I created the article in 2006 and it survived an AFD the same year. Standards can change over time, and I do not feel that the subject satisfies WP:BIO She has worked as a journalist and has published things here and there, but what is needed are articles ABOUT her, not just BY her. Edison ( talk) 17:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America 1000 00:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
An article about an artist and their website. Other than self-sourced material and creator-supplied bios, sources are a few (mostly dead) blogs and a couple of paragraphs in books. While there is evidence that this artist has exhibited, the coverage falls very far short of "has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition", or the other criteria described at WP:ARTIST. The site itself doesn't pass WP:WEB. I don't believe there's any credible evidence that the general standard of WP:GNG, that is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - what we have is trivial coverage, unreliable sources, and the subject as the source. -- Finlay McWalter··–· Talk 13:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 16:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it meets WP:GNG, and it certainly doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 12:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wyoming Business Council. Anything to merge can be taken from the history. So Why 16:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced, no indication of notability, Jjjjjjdddddd ( talk) 23:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft deletion per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Greenbörg (talk) 07:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America 1000 16:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
sigh ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 15:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
non-notable individual Jon Kolbert ( talk) 07:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
not a particularly notable group Jon Kolbert ( talk) 07:39, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy Delete. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR ♠ 15:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely this was ever more than locally notable, and based on the home page, www.fescny.org/, the last event was in 2013. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Edwardx ( talk) 11:04, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept at AfD in 2008 and PRODed recently by Jytdog after it came to light that the article creator was part of a paid editing sock farm. The issue here is that this is a non-notable award stub that exists to promote the subject and that it should be deleted as such. TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:35, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Hailed as "the Oscars of the Irish web and online world"( ref) "Oscar of X" and "nobel of X " is classic promotional hype. Jytdog ( talk) 14:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 06:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:GNG. Non-noteable mixed-used development project that is still under way. No signs of notable coverage of the project during the first few phases of the project. Comatmebro ( talk) 13:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:08, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Biography, resting on IMDb and one single piece of reliable source coverage, of a film and television actor known only for bit parts -- the roles posited in the introduction as his best known were as "Blake's valet", "Old Janitor" and "Elderly S&M Enthusiast", not as named characters; the only other role listed in his filmography here was a single episode of a sitcom; and while IMDb lists other roles, none of them are any closer to being "major" roles for the purposes of passing WP:NACTOR (and IMDb isn't considered a reliable source anyway, as its content is user-generated and can contain uncaught errors.) As always, every actor who existed is not handed an automatic free notability pass just for having had roles -- he needs to be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to actually pass an NACTOR criterion, but nothing written or sourced here accomplishes that at all. Bearcat ( talk) 00:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
a non-notable writer who fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR due to lack of reliable independent coverage. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 00:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
The article is merely a collection of tables which document miscellaneous statistics about the council and doesn't convey why it its organisational notability. DrStrauss talk 12:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced article, unable to determine notability, contested prod. WWGB ( talk) 12:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
I do not see how this guy passes WP:GNG. It was created by the now-blocked Billy Hathorn, who seemed to work in tandem with some other Shreveportian (?) contributors, eg: see the equally non-notable Sarah Hudson-Pierce. Sitush ( talk) 11:55, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. multi-posted spam for the organisation, user now blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:37, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, meets WP:SELFPROMOTE instead. Kleuske ( talk) 11:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep Meets point 2. from WP:NHOCKEY Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant by playing in NZIHL and Australian Ice Hockey League as well as playing for New Zealand National Team even if it wasn't in the top pool for World Championship, I think between the two things it is enough for him to have a page. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 06:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep Meets point 2. from WP:NHOCKEY Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant by playing in NZIHL and Australian Ice Hockey League as well as playing for New Zealand National Team even if it wasn't in the top pool for World Championship, I think between the two things it is enough for him to have a page. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 06:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep Meets point 2. from WP:NHOCKEY Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant by playing in NZIHL and Australian Ice Hockey League as well as playing for New Zealand National Team even if it wasn't in the top pool for World Championship, I think between the two things it is enough for him to have a page. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 06:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable character in a non-notable fictional book (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treason For My Daily Bread). This article - as well as the articles about the book and the book's author - cites various unreliable fringe sources as evidence that they were fooled by the premise of the story. I do not see any significant coverage in reliable sources about this character. Location ( talk) 03:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 06:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 06:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 06:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 06:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and much harder WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 08:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
No significant indication of notability. We Got This Covered is a musical blog, The Bangin Beats isn't notable nor reliable either, hence fails WP:NSONG. Article is also unlikely to grow beyond stub class considering there's very little information on the Internet. Hayman30 ( talk) 10:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable real estate developer lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. If this were a person it would be a resume. reddogsix ( talk) 15:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The reason, by the bye, for the phrasing of Criterion #2 is twofold. First off, as happened with many team sports, ice hockey's top leagues predated the era of professional sports, and the first fully professional leagues didn't appear until the 20th century. Secondly, Iron Curtain nations such as the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia did not permit "professional" leagues to exist, yet maintained high levels of play through their official "amateur" leagues. Criterion #2 was never meant to suggest (and indeed does not) the patently absurd premise that amateur level play is presumptively notable worldwide. Ravenswing 22:48, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 08:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Article is a plot summary without stated sources apart from the book itself and therefore is original research. Cannot find any reviews. Happy to withdraw this nomination if commentary or reviews supporting the text are found. Philafrenzy ( talk) 09:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Minimally sourced biography of a person notable primarily as the (lord) mayor of a small town. The town is not large enough to hand its (lord) mayors an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NPOL, and the article is not reliably sourced well enough to media coverage about him to get over the "who have received significant press coverage" part of our inclusion criteria for local officeholders -- the only source actually present here is a brief namecheck of his existence in a very general history of why this town gets to call its mayors "lord mayor". (And just for the record, it's not for the reasons why a British mayor would get that title.) Politicians at the local level, especially in small towns, don't automatically qualify for articles just because they can be nominally verified as existing; they need to be demonstrated and sourced as significantly more notable than the norm, but nothing here does that.
There's also a conflict of interest here — I won't go into precise detail so I don't out anyone, but I have been able to confirm that Goring did have relatives whose surname corresponds neatly to the usernames of both the article creator and the person who uploaded the "scanned from a family photo album" image in the infobox. (And then after writing that I discovered that the creator openly states the family relationship to Goring right on their own userpage. Leave it to me to make a one-step job five times harder than it needs to be!) Bearcat ( talk) 23:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:45, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced (except for IMDb, which is not a reliable source) biography of a musician, whose only claim of notability is having been in an Elvis Presley film -- in a role so minor that his "character name" in the IMDb profile is literally, I'm not even kidding, "Minor role". As always, every person in every film does not get an automatic inclusion freebie just for existing, and neither does every musician -- he must be the subject of enough reliable source coverage about him in media to clear WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 23:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 16:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
WP:AUTOBIO of a musician and publisher, making no particularly strong claim of notability for either endeavour and referenced to no reliable source coverage: the only references here are a primary source and two blog entries, not substantive coverage in real media. And even if his notability could be properly demonstrated, conflict of interest says he doesn't get to write the article himself. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody other than the subject himself can write and source an article properly, but nothing here is good enough. Bearcat ( talk) 23:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was Delete. All uninvolved editors agreed. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:55, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable software, a Google search did not reveal any independent in-depth coverage. None of the 16 used sources (2 are duplicates) qualifies as a fully independent reliable source with in-depth coverage (I'll add a detailed source review below). A possible "conflict of interest" hasn't been clarified and disclosed yet. GermanJoe ( talk) 12:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
A more detailed review of the used sources (reference numbering as of now, may change):
In short: a lot of PR activities and professional marketing, but nothing to establish notability. GermanJoe ( talk) 12:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Updated from July, 24 by Techforcatch
Even though the references are self-published, they were approved by our customers. The references were updated by reducing the number of mentions to one.
Ref #4 is the link to the article in the group of project management professionals. Here’s the part of it, if you lack access to this group. The article shows that Flow MPM, an earlier version of Epicflow, helped Pilz Netherlands win National Business Success 2015 Award. LinkedIn members can get access to this group. https://www.dropbox.com/s/tv56mbcoantrzat/Screenshot%202017-07-24%2019.19.59.png?dl=0
Ref#7 is a success story, based on the benefits Epicflow’s real clients get after using the software for three months.
StartUs Magazine is an independent source. The article was autonomously written by Daniel Tanque after the Web Summit 2016, Lisbon. It does not include any advertising material, rather spreads the news about the release of a project management tool, pointing to its unique features that have not been developed before.
Ref #9 (an article about Epicflow and MS Project) was approved by an independent editor of Project Accelerator with no costs spent for publishing.
The content was written independently by Finances Online expert, after crediting Epicflow with two awards without pursuing any marketing goals.
Refs #11 and 12 prove scientific PM expertise of our researchers - Jan Willem Tromp and Albert Ponsteen. These are publications in Procedia, a reliable scientific source with peer-reviews under the responsibility of Scientific Committee of IPMA 2014.
The article was approved by an independent editor from Project-Management.com. Our researcher’s expertise in this domain has already been shown above, as he contributed to a reliable scientific journal under responsibility of Scientific Committee of IPMA 2014.
Ref #15 was updated.
Refs #16 and 17 were updated.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Techforcatch ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Appears to fail WP:GNG with only WP:ROUTINE sources from the Las Vegas area and the primary tenant, the Vegas Golden Knights. Could be integrated/merged into the Team information section of the Golden Knights' article but at this point because of the WP:RECENTISM it appears to just be WP:TOOSOON. Yosemiter ( talk) 22:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:51, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:23, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
He fails WP:NPOL and seems to fail harder WP:GNG too. Greenbörg (talk) 06:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Not a particularly notable company, fails WP:CORP. Most sources cited are from the company itself, and those that are not only mention the company in passing and as such fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Also note this page has been speedy deleted under A7 several times in the deletion log. SamHolt6 ( talk) 13:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Most of these references (soundcloud, aquasound, etc.) are not references to independent sources, they are links to where music can be heard or to promotional material for the subject. No substantive discussion in reliable independent secondary published sources. KDS4444 ( talk) 07:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Greenbörg (talk) 06:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 16:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Greenbörg (talk) 07:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 08:27, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Biography, formatted and sourced like a genealogy rather than an encyclopedia article, about a person whose strongest discernible claim of notability is that he lived in the looming shadow of war (which in the 1600s, who didn't?) Nothing here passes any subject-specific inclusion standard, and none of the sourcing counts toward WP:GNG. Bearcat ( talk) 21:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 16:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable person and fails Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 20:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was merge to Oswald Foundation. The target's notability can be discussed separately but does not impede a merge close here So Why 15:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Lots of references and superficially impressive, but am struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage. Fails WP:BIO. Edwardx ( talk) 20:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Definitely many references that I reduced. Consider merging with Oswald Foundation? 182.69.63.72 ( talk)
The result was delete. The redirect of this page to Lissi und der wilde Kaiser can be re-performed if desired. North America 1000 00:11, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable web star. Absolutely no secondary or tertiary sources. Zhangj1079 ( T| C) 19:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Note that the consensus here is clearly for deletion (i.e. it's G4-eligible), but it's also a major copyright violation so it's being deleted officially as WP:G12. Primefac ( talk) 14:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
No reliable sources found and no mentions or independent articles from GNEWS. It's a case of WP:TOOSOON Zazzysa ( talk) 19:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 10:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
An advertorially toned page for a student theatre society. Significant RS coverage to meet WP:NORG not found; what comes is PR-driven or trivial mentions. Proposing either a Delete or a Redirect to University of New South Wales. Previous AfDs closed as Keep (2005) and Delete (2007). K.e.coffman ( talk) 19:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 15:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage. Fails WP:BIO. Edwardx ( talk) 19:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Mz7 ( talk) 06:29, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
None of the references appear to discuss this specific model; V-Model (software development) is a separate article. Massive amounts of unsourced material that are possibly original research. Power~enwiki ( talk) 03:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Neither 'reference' appear to mention his name and I'm not finding anything on Google. Derek Andrews ( talk) 18:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per nominator. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 18:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
WP:NOTMANUAL, also WP:NOTWEBHOST. — Cahk ( talk) 17:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
An earlier incarnation of this article was AfD'd just over 12 months ago with the general consensus being that it was too soon for this young DJ to pass notability standards. I submit that it may well still be too soon. While there are plenty of links, these are to the tracks themselves, rather than to the depth and breadth of coverage required by NMUSIC/GNG. He's still very much an up-and-comer, but what I can see suggests he's not quite there yet. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:24, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
I redirected this article because I could not identify sources which were not either primary or non-regional according to WP:N/ WP:NORG. My redirect was contested. I continue to hold the belief that an examination of the sources will show that the sources are indeed low quality, so I am submitting this article to AFD. Izno ( talk) 16:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 15:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NCORP. Article redirected during a WP:PROD only be restarted by another editor. No evidence of notability Ajf773 ( talk) 23:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Foundry (band). So Why 15:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Sources given are press releases and/or only mention the subject in conjunction with the band Foundry. Notability is not inherited by association. Google searches revealed some stand alone coverage in self-published or related sources such as corporate profiles or other online communities. However, insufficient to establish WP:INDY, WP:N and WP:SOURCE pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 07:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus that this is really WP:TOOSOON. So Why 16:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:TOOSOON. Sports season that is still two years away. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep: although it is two years away, the arrival of Porsche and Mercedes is significant. Porsche will discontinue the Porsche 919 Hybrid project—which uses hybrid technology—from the World Endurance Championship; with Audi having already left, Toyota is the only manufacturer in the WEC, so the full consequences of Porsche's defection to Formula E remain to be seen. Likewise, Mercedes compete in Formula 1, which also uses hybrid technology, and while they are committed to the series (for now), their announcement comes at a time when Formula 1 is negotiating the 2021 engine regulations. All of this has triggered a wider discussion about what the future of motorsport is going to look like as Formula E is becoming manufacters' preferred test bed, especially in light of announcements from the French and British governments that they will ban cars with combustion engines in the next few decades. The bottom line is that while it might be very early to create the article, it's incredibly significant in the context of global motorsport. As a precedent, the 2014 Formula One season article was created two years in advance of the season as the regulation changes that were introduced for 2014 were a massive overhaul of the engine formula. Prisonermonkeys ( talk) 03:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America 1000 00:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
I created the article in 2006 and it survived an AFD the same year. Standards can change over time, and I do not feel that the subject satisfies WP:BIO She has worked as a journalist and has published things here and there, but what is needed are articles ABOUT her, not just BY her. Edison ( talk) 17:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein. North America 1000 00:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
An article about an artist and their website. Other than self-sourced material and creator-supplied bios, sources are a few (mostly dead) blogs and a couple of paragraphs in books. While there is evidence that this artist has exhibited, the coverage falls very far short of "has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition", or the other criteria described at WP:ARTIST. The site itself doesn't pass WP:WEB. I don't believe there's any credible evidence that the general standard of WP:GNG, that is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" - what we have is trivial coverage, unreliable sources, and the subject as the source. -- Finlay McWalter··–· Talk 13:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. So Why 16:04, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it meets WP:GNG, and it certainly doesn't meet WP:NFILM. Onel5969 TT me 12:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Wyoming Business Council. Anything to merge can be taken from the history. So Why 16:05, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Unsourced, no indication of notability, Jjjjjjdddddd ( talk) 23:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft deletion per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:52, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Greenbörg (talk) 07:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America 1000 16:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
sigh ((( The Quixotic Potato))) ( talk) 15:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
non-notable individual Jon Kolbert ( talk) 07:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
not a particularly notable group Jon Kolbert ( talk) 07:39, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy Delete. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR ♠ 15:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely this was ever more than locally notable, and based on the home page, www.fescny.org/, the last event was in 2013. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Edwardx ( talk) 11:04, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 14:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept at AfD in 2008 and PRODed recently by Jytdog after it came to light that the article creator was part of a paid editing sock farm. The issue here is that this is a non-notable award stub that exists to promote the subject and that it should be deleted as such. TonyBallioni ( talk) 14:35, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Hailed as "the Oscars of the Irish web and online world"( ref) "Oscar of X" and "nobel of X " is classic promotional hype. Jytdog ( talk) 14:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 06:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Per WP:GNG. Non-noteable mixed-used development project that is still under way. No signs of notable coverage of the project during the first few phases of the project. Comatmebro ( talk) 13:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:08, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Biography, resting on IMDb and one single piece of reliable source coverage, of a film and television actor known only for bit parts -- the roles posited in the introduction as his best known were as "Blake's valet", "Old Janitor" and "Elderly S&M Enthusiast", not as named characters; the only other role listed in his filmography here was a single episode of a sitcom; and while IMDb lists other roles, none of them are any closer to being "major" roles for the purposes of passing WP:NACTOR (and IMDb isn't considered a reliable source anyway, as its content is user-generated and can contain uncaught errors.) As always, every actor who existed is not handed an automatic free notability pass just for having had roles -- he needs to be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to actually pass an NACTOR criterion, but nothing written or sourced here accomplishes that at all. Bearcat ( talk) 00:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
a non-notable writer who fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR due to lack of reliable independent coverage. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 00:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
The article is merely a collection of tables which document miscellaneous statistics about the council and doesn't convey why it its organisational notability. DrStrauss talk 12:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Unreferenced article, unable to determine notability, contested prod. WWGB ( talk) 12:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
I do not see how this guy passes WP:GNG. It was created by the now-blocked Billy Hathorn, who seemed to work in tandem with some other Shreveportian (?) contributors, eg: see the equally non-notable Sarah Hudson-Pierce. Sitush ( talk) 11:55, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. multi-posted spam for the organisation, user now blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:37, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG, meets WP:SELFPROMOTE instead. Kleuske ( talk) 11:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep Meets point 2. from WP:NHOCKEY Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant by playing in NZIHL and Australian Ice Hockey League as well as playing for New Zealand National Team even if it wasn't in the top pool for World Championship, I think between the two things it is enough for him to have a page. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 06:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep Meets point 2. from WP:NHOCKEY Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant by playing in NZIHL and Australian Ice Hockey League as well as playing for New Zealand National Team even if it wasn't in the top pool for World Championship, I think between the two things it is enough for him to have a page. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:22, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 06:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep Meets point 2. from WP:NHOCKEY Played one or more games in an amateur league considered, through lack of a professional league, the highest level of competition extant by playing in NZIHL and Australian Ice Hockey League as well as playing for New Zealand National Team even if it wasn't in the top pool for World Championship, I think between the two things it is enough for him to have a page. NZ Footballs Conscience (talk) 01:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete As per nom. DerbyCountyinNZ ( Talk Contribs) 06:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:07, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:06, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:01, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:31, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 21:26, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:36, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 18:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable character in a non-notable fictional book (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treason For My Daily Bread). This article - as well as the articles about the book and the book's author - cites various unreliable fringe sources as evidence that they were fooled by the premise of the story. I do not see any significant coverage in reliable sources about this character. Location ( talk) 03:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 06:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:59, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 06:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 06:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 06:01, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:58, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player and fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 05:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NPOL and much harder WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 08:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
No significant indication of notability. We Got This Covered is a musical blog, The Bangin Beats isn't notable nor reliable either, hence fails WP:NSONG. Article is also unlikely to grow beyond stub class considering there's very little information on the Internet. Hayman30 ( talk) 10:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable real estate developer lacking non-trivial, in-depth support. If this were a person it would be a resume. reddogsix ( talk) 15:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 08:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The reason, by the bye, for the phrasing of Criterion #2 is twofold. First off, as happened with many team sports, ice hockey's top leagues predated the era of professional sports, and the first fully professional leagues didn't appear until the 20th century. Secondly, Iron Curtain nations such as the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia did not permit "professional" leagues to exist, yet maintained high levels of play through their official "amateur" leagues. Criterion #2 was never meant to suggest (and indeed does not) the patently absurd premise that amateur level play is presumptively notable worldwide. Ravenswing 22:48, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. Lankiveil ( speak to me) 08:30, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Article is a plot summary without stated sources apart from the book itself and therefore is original research. Cannot find any reviews. Happy to withdraw this nomination if commentary or reviews supporting the text are found. Philafrenzy ( talk) 09:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
The result was delete. soft delete per WP:NOQUORUM. ~ Rob13 Talk 17:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Non-notable hockey player. Lacks GNG to justify an article. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 00:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)