The result was no consensus. The "delete" arguments don't strike me as so compelling as to mandate deletion; they say the article is bad, but rarely go into any detail as to how and why this requires deletion per our policies. Sandstein 12:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
It's a well sourced op-ed piece that fails WP:NPOV, WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:NOTOPINION. The subject may well be notable but this essay is so deeply flawed that it would likely have to be rewritten from the ground up to pass NPOV. Better to blow it up and start from scratch. Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO, little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Of the three sources cited, one link is dead and the other two are the standard Q & A interviews of "up and coming artists" from record magazines. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:COMPOSER. Magnolia677 ( talk) 22:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
WP:N and WP:COPYPASTE - Product seems to lack notoriety, page is written with copy + paste from corporate website, thus seems to look like advertisement Nicnote ( talk) 21:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Mid-ranking officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Junior officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award, and a Silver Star, a third-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Mid-ranking officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award, and a Silver Star, a third-level award. No other claim to fame. Fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 02:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 20:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
NCO who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Already deleted pursuant to Special:Permalink/730817529#Undisclosed Paid Editing Farm. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 11:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Page was created by a WP:SPA. The entity has 53 mentions on Google news but, for an Internet Entrepreneur who has been around since 1993, that's *nothing*. Fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 20:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Junior officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award, as well as a Silver Star, a third-level award. No other claim to fame. Fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Article created by a banned user. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive846#I_would_like_to_report_user:daniellagreen_for_doing_paid_editing_with_nondisclosure_to_wikipedia_as_is_the_current_policy. Mkdw talk 21:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 20:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
NCO who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. Other awards just for service and qualification. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Private who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. Deprodded with the comment "incorrect reasoning for deletion, he received five awards". The other awards were the Purple Heart, awarded simply because he was killed in combat, two service medals and a qualification badge. Being killed in action is not a claim to notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Mid-ranking officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other particular claim to fame. Fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. Deprodded with the comment "incorrect reasoning for deletion, he received multiple awards". He did indeed receive other awards, but all low-level awards, not even third-level, to be expected of an officer of his rank. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
NCO who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other notability standard. Deprodded with the comment "incorrect reasoning for deletion, he received two awards and was wounded in combat". The other award was the Purple Heart, awarded simply because he was wounded in combat. Being wounded or even killed in action is not a claim to notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Bishonen under criterion A7. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 00:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Created by User:Intrepidmarketinggroup this article has one blog post as a reference, I can find nothing much else, let alone any in-depth coverage of the company. Fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 19:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 19:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:LOCAL and WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 18:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL) is an opinion essay, rather than a guideline or policy, and is almost exclusively about places of local interest, rather than subjects (people). WP:NPASR with a valid deletion rationale. North America 1000 21:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:LOCAL CerealKillerYum ( talk) 18:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 11:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Absolutely no references at all. Contains virtually entirely original research and I don't think this is a notable topic for its own article - some of this could be moved to Striking clock but the rest needs to go. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 18:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Tarar Media Corporation is a fake corporation. Its Facebook Page has only 3 likes and its twitter page has 5 followers. The picture used on Tarar Media Corporation on Facebook page is taken from British Times - a personal blog. and the other two references are blank and ambiguous taken from Fitraak News - a blog. I will suggest that the page Tarar Media Corporation must also be nominated for deletion because its references are irrelevant and do not show notability. Sneha Hurrain ( talk) 18:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was: already deleted per https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=730817529#Undisclosed_Paid_Editing_Farm (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:N and is a clear advertisement. The page was created by a WP:SPA [ [5]] who has only 3 edits. All sources except a few are from non-notable publications. There are some notable publications in the reference list but, if you look closer, they're not applicable. For example, this [ [6]] Hpost link is to an author page. It's not an article about "Alex Becker" and it's not even about this Alex Becker (it's some other Alex Becker). This article on CNBC [ [7]] is better but it's not about the entity but his views on success. The subject also wrote a book which did make it on the US Today list but it was for the independent category. Its highest ranking was #103 in best-sellers which is totally different than what one would get from "The book went to break multiple national bestseller lists including USA Today’s and the national indie bestseller list."[ [8]]. Obviously, this is an advertisement filled with puffery that was written by someone close to the subject. Please delete. CerealKillerYum ( talk) 18:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Already speedy deleted following creator's blanking. Sandstein 16:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
There's a claim to notability with the development of the "world's first concrete based floating solar power plant", however this notability does not seem to be able to be verified, as I'm unable to locate sources for verification. Also, the only hit that "Ajay Thomas" receives is this: [9], which does not refer to the subject of this article. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 18:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Same reasons as
last time. No indication of
notability per
WP:BIO and no citations to
reliable sources that are
independent of the subject.
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
17:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Move to aircraft bridge and rewrite accordingly. Sandstein 16:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Airport taxiway bridges are not notable. Half the page is written as an advert for the architect and engineers of record. The only link to the page is from the architect's page. Millbrooky ( talk) 15:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 11:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Subject is an obscure award, with virtually no independant mainstream RS coverage. Cited sources are almost entirely affiliated with the industry/award and fail WP:RS. Subject ultimately fails GNG. See also this related discussion. Ad Orientem ( talk) 14:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of stars in Pisces. czar 05:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
The article makes no claim to notability for this star under WP:NASTRO and I can find nothing notable about it. Lithopsian ( talk) 19:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Not notable. There is some dispute over whether the show even aired. ubiquity ( talk) 20:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 00:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and has no reliable coverage from third-party sources. Doing a search for "Apex Online Racing" brings up only forum posts and other unreliable material. This is the best I could find throughout my searches, and it's a summary of their app.
I also propose that the following are discussed too:
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Failed PROD. Reason: Unsourced BLP since article creation in 2009. Fails WP:NACTOR (only notable role was supporting role on Harper's Island, which alone does not satisfy NACTOR), and fails WP:GNG outright (only a couple of passing mentions in regards to Harper's Island and Nightmare at the End of the Hall in Variety and THR, and no other significant mentions anywhere). -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 15:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. It seems that nobody actually wants to keep this, despite the lengthy discussion? Sandstein 16:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
This page has multiple issues and has had the "multiple issues" template for over a year. It has no sources, and the stated inclusion criteria is subjective and arbitrary. Shelbystripes ( talk) 15:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Not only have my searches not found anything actually substantial, there's nothing at all here or at Hungarian Wiki, only their own links listed and my searches simply found a few mentions including for events thus there's nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 02:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
My searches are simply not finding anything actually substantially convincing, there's nothing to suggest there's the noticeable independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 00:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. The only sources listed on the article are self-promoting. Unable to find any substantive independent coverage of the subject. Nominated for Speedy in the past and previously listed at AfD with the result of softdelete due to lack of participation. Pax Verbum 04:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
No prejudice against recreation if new reliable sources surface that provide significant coverage of the subject.
The result was redirect to www.tism.wanker.com. czar 05:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 03:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 05:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Article has become a cruft magnet littered with some rather questionable entries ( most of which were removed here). Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 02:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 11:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 02:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Clear G11 , promotional editing by COI editor. DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Currently there are no reliable sources listed as to why this person is notable. A quick search query on Google found no Reliable sources indicating Notability. Self promotion to boot. VViking Talk Edits 13:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
I am still working on the references, and how to have them done this week or next. I was out of the country for a couple of weeks and have just returned. I have intentionally written the article in a third voice and endeavored to be neutral and factual. The article contains many outside links to confirm the validity of the facts stated, and I am working on the References section. This seems to satisfy the overall goal desired in avoiding self-authorship. I hope you agree. NNicholaou ( talk) 14:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
I had added a number of books I've contributed to and referenced them at Amazon, but those have been deleted by VViking. I speak at about 20 national and regional conferences each year and have been published in print more than 400 times. There are nearly 200 of my print articles available on our website for free (www.mbsinc.com), so this is not self-promotion to make a buck. Rather, it is to help more folks seeking help. I have become one of the chief IT strategists for IT in churches and ministries, and believe this page helps those looking for credible content. I hope you agree. More edits coming from others, including publishers, soon. (May I put those books back?) NNicholaou ( talk) 20:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete per OP. 142.105.159.60 ( talk) 03:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 02:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 13:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The external links say nothing about this subject. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 13:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7. I told Class455fan1 to AfD it, but then changed my mind. In fact the article might be a borderline WP:CSD#G3 in places. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Non Notable person. Also Autobiographical as the creator is the subject, which i found out when i researched this person. None of the sources mentioned contain "Wesley Spartan" anywhere (One is a blog, so is unreliable). Class455fan1 ( talk) 12:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G3 blatant hoax. JohnCD ( talk) 09:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This article sounds like a hoax. Sources don't match what the article says, and it seems this dish does not even exist. Googling "Gakhain makh orooson" only leads to this article, no mention elsewhere. This is a blatant hoax TheCoffeeAddict talk| contribs 11:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Autobots#Cyberjets. Or wherever subsequent discussion may determine Sandstein 16:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Substub on a toy line. No evidence of notability and no sources cited. A prod was contested with the mystifying claim that this is acting as a disambiguation page "of sorts". Josh Milburn ( talk) 16:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Subject is a graduate with an interest in poetry. No evidence of general notability. Imaginatorium ( talk) 09:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Favonian ( talk) 15:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:MUSBIO and WP:NACTOR : I fail to find any coverage in reliable sources about the album/single or award nomination (except this) also there is no source to support actor or recording producer. The article was created by a sock of Mnaqvii. Thank You – GSS ( talk) 09:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. blatant spam, salted now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable company, unsourced. Article has been speedied 3 times and re-created. Time to delete and Salt. Pam D 08:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Funimation voice actor notable for Kizaru in One Piece, which is a supporting role. And that's about it. WP:TOOSOON. Does not meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Not a regular on ANN or the Anime conventions circuit. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 05:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 07:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR. Her work is exclusive to a book series that does never have a separate Wikipedia article, and as of now it seems the major thing possibly notable of her is her death. I'd say we either delete or rename to Death of Helen Bailey, as the person by herself isn't necessarily notable. Rusted AutoParts 05:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
References
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP, with some advertorial overtones, of a person who is notable only as a local media personality in a single midsized media market, and who is referenced only to a single deadlinked article in a local community weekly newspaper. This is not a claim of notability that gives a person automatic inclusion rights on Wikipedia -- if he could be sourced over WP:GNG for it there would be a case for inclusion, but the referencing here fails to accomplish that. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 05:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is clear consensus to not keep this as a stand-alone article. Beyond that, opinion is evenly split between an outright delete and redirecting is somewhere. Normally, I would be inclined to go with the redirect, per WP:ATD, but in this case, the most commonly suggested redirect target, Eurasianism#Greater Russia, has already been removed, as WP:SYNTH. So, I'm going to go with the straight delete here. Anybody can recreate this as a redirect, if they can find a reasonable target to redirect it to (with the understanding, of course, that reasonable can be tricky to define, and might have to be defended at XfD). -- RoySmith (talk) 02:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Wild original research. There is no such concept in Russian culture. 'Velikorossiya' ? - It is something else. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician whose claims to passing WP:NMUSIC are sourced entirely to social networking platforms, YouTube videos, iTunes and blogs. As always, a musician is not automatically entitled to coverage in Wikipedia just because he exists -- he must be the subject of reliable source coverage which properly verifies an NMUSIC pass, but out of 28 citations here, not even one of them is to a reliable source. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a rapper with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, which is referenced entirely to his own self-published social networking content about himself with not a shred of reliable source coverage shown. Also conflict of interest, as the article was created by an editor whose username corresponds to the article subject's claimed real name. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable fashion label. Source in article is a 2 minute video from a minor news TV station superficially covering the business, and I couldn't find any other really reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. ~ | twsx | talk cont | ~ 04:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn. NasssaNser 02:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:NF, can't be attributed to reliable sources. NasssaNser 04:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After three relists, consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 16:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
This article was created by a blocked paid editor without disclosing his paid edits and in violation of wikipedia terms of service. Overtime, the article was turned into a PR piece and added with PR sources which have been eventually removed. After pruning of the article for ineligible content by experienced editors, it is left with no sources, a few self publications and a one line intro. Obviously the article does not meet up the notability criteria and should be deleted. All searches that come up on google are PR pieces, self published books and other promotional material. The few news reports that come up are bare mentions or quotations without indepth coverage of subject. As far as this article will exist, editors and administrators will be wasting their time protecting an ineligible article from promotion attempts. The purpose of this article appears to make the name come up on top on google search to promote the subject which is not an allowed use of wikipedia.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete. One among the lakhs of district magistrates in India. Fails WP:BIO Uncletomwood ( talk) 09:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Article was prodded with rationale: "Subject is a young footballer who has not yet played in a fully professional league or at senior international level, so fails the sport-specific notability guideline, and about whom there's no evidence of enough non-routine independent significant coverage to satisfy the general notability guideline." PROD removed by creator, with edit summary "May fail WP:NFOOTY but surely does not fail WP:BIO. There has been much media hype circling around this player and has a professional contract with Arsenal for the third year." I'd suggest that the reports of Arsenal reportedly beating Man Utd to signing the player on scholarship terms are just that: media hype, with nowhere near enough solid content to pass WP:BIO. Struway2 ( talk) 08:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect restored by article creator. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 18:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Not notable. Only sourced to some blog, but even if it were properly sourced the “trapezoid height“ or any particular derivation of it is not independently notable. Should redirect to Trapezoid, e.g. to Trapezoid#Midsegment and height. JohnBlackburne words deeds 02:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
What under what criterion of notability does this fail? You are not being specific. It should not redirect to Trapezoid#Midsegment and height because there the statement of the fact is given without proof. Please give your argument with respect to the definition. Under what definition is a forum about math an invalid source? In fact, by your argument the image of a visual proof of the Pythagorean theorem uploaded by you and linked through your talk page is not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.219.24 ( talk) 03:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:ARTIST. I don't see much out there about him, and the two galleries specified where he exhibited are redlinked. Clarityfiend ( talk) 02:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a hoax/deliberate mischief. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
No references found for this supposed film or the equally dubious series. This is the only credit from the article's creator, and it appears to be an April Fool's joke (for example, the original version also included a misleading wikilink that actually logged users out of Wikipedia). In any case, the apparent hoax fails WP:V. Calamondin12 ( talk) 02:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Moved to Draft:Particle teleportation. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
This article has only one reference, a fringe paper by one scientist, and there is no evidence that this concept has been given serious discussion by other scientists. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a hoax. I guess I'll move this to the museum just because it lasted so long. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
No references exist anywhere online for this supposed HBO miniseries. The article was created by an IP in 2005, and the only other contribution from this user was an edit to HBO's page adding this entry and the well-known John Adams (miniseries) to its list of programming. Upcoming programming on a major channel like HBO typically draws fairly broad coverage, with announcements about the cast and other details released many months before the show makes its on-air premiere; the absence of any such material suggests that HBO never worked on this show at all or abandoned the project at an extremely early stage in its development. This could conceivably be an intentional hoax (in which case it would be the longest-lived hoax yet found on Wikipedia), but even if that isn't the case, the article fails WP:V. Calamondin12 ( talk) 02:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
We only seem to have massive lists like List of aircraft manufacturers B-C, which isn't sortable. This new list is, but I can't help but think "Commercial-Business Passenger airplanes manufacturer Companies By Production Approx Passenger Capacity Range" is a fairly incomprehensible and WP:Indiscriminate concept for a standalone list. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The "delete" arguments don't strike me as so compelling as to mandate deletion; they say the article is bad, but rarely go into any detail as to how and why this requires deletion per our policies. Sandstein 12:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
It's a well sourced op-ed piece that fails WP:NPOV, WP:NOTESSAY, and WP:NOTOPINION. The subject may well be notable but this essay is so deeply flawed that it would likely have to be rewritten from the ground up to pass NPOV. Better to blow it up and start from scratch. Ad Orientem ( talk) 23:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO, little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Of the three sources cited, one link is dead and the other two are the standard Q & A interviews of "up and coming artists" from record magazines. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:COMPOSER. Magnolia677 ( talk) 22:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:11, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
WP:N and WP:COPYPASTE - Product seems to lack notoriety, page is written with copy + paste from corporate website, thus seems to look like advertisement Nicnote ( talk) 21:28, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:35, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Mid-ranking officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Junior officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award, and a Silver Star, a third-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:51, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Mid-ranking officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award, and a Silver Star, a third-level award. No other claim to fame. Fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:47, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 02:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 20:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:28, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
NCO who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:42, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was procedural close. Already deleted pursuant to Special:Permalink/730817529#Undisclosed Paid Editing Farm. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 11:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Page was created by a WP:SPA. The entity has 53 mentions on Google news but, for an Internet Entrepreneur who has been around since 1993, that's *nothing*. Fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 20:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Junior officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award, as well as a Silver Star, a third-level award. No other claim to fame. Fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Article created by a banned user. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive846#I_would_like_to_report_user:daniellagreen_for_doing_paid_editing_with_nondisclosure_to_wikipedia_as_is_the_current_policy. Mkdw talk 21:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 20:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:29, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
NCO who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. Other awards just for service and qualification. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:24, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Private who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. Deprodded with the comment "incorrect reasoning for deletion, he received five awards". The other awards were the Purple Heart, awarded simply because he was killed in combat, two service medals and a qualification badge. Being killed in action is not a claim to notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:30, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Mid-ranking officer who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other particular claim to fame. Fails WP:SOLDIER and every other standard. Deprodded with the comment "incorrect reasoning for deletion, he received multiple awards". He did indeed receive other awards, but all low-level awards, not even third-level, to be expected of an officer of his rank. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:07, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. AustralianRupert ( talk) 07:02, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
NCO who received a single Distinguished Service Cross, a second-level award. No other claim to fame. Completely fails WP:SOLDIER and every other notability standard. Deprodded with the comment "incorrect reasoning for deletion, he received two awards and was wounded in combat". The other award was the Purple Heart, awarded simply because he was wounded in combat. Being wounded or even killed in action is not a claim to notability. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 20:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by User:Bishonen under criterion A7. (Non-admin closure) " Pepper" @ 00:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Created by User:Intrepidmarketinggroup this article has one blog post as a reference, I can find nothing much else, let alone any in-depth coverage of the company. Fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong ( talk) 19:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 19:05, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 19:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:31, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:LOCAL and WP:N CerealKillerYum ( talk) 18:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. Wikipedia:Places of local interest (WP:LOCAL) is an opinion essay, rather than a guideline or policy, and is almost exclusively about places of local interest, rather than subjects (people). WP:NPASR with a valid deletion rationale. North America 1000 21:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:LOCAL CerealKillerYum ( talk) 18:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 11:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Absolutely no references at all. Contains virtually entirely original research and I don't think this is a notable topic for its own article - some of this could be moved to Striking clock but the rest needs to go. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> ( talk) 18:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:32, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Tarar Media Corporation is a fake corporation. Its Facebook Page has only 3 likes and its twitter page has 5 followers. The picture used on Tarar Media Corporation on Facebook page is taken from British Times - a personal blog. and the other two references are blank and ambiguous taken from Fitraak News - a blog. I will suggest that the page Tarar Media Corporation must also be nominated for deletion because its references are irrelevant and do not show notability. Sneha Hurrain ( talk) 18:27, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was: already deleted per https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=730817529#Undisclosed_Paid_Editing_Farm (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 16:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:N and is a clear advertisement. The page was created by a WP:SPA [ [5]] who has only 3 edits. All sources except a few are from non-notable publications. There are some notable publications in the reference list but, if you look closer, they're not applicable. For example, this [ [6]] Hpost link is to an author page. It's not an article about "Alex Becker" and it's not even about this Alex Becker (it's some other Alex Becker). This article on CNBC [ [7]] is better but it's not about the entity but his views on success. The subject also wrote a book which did make it on the US Today list but it was for the independent category. Its highest ranking was #103 in best-sellers which is totally different than what one would get from "The book went to break multiple national bestseller lists including USA Today’s and the national indie bestseller list."[ [8]]. Obviously, this is an advertisement filled with puffery that was written by someone close to the subject. Please delete. CerealKillerYum ( talk) 18:36, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Already speedy deleted following creator's blanking. Sandstein 16:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
There's a claim to notability with the development of the "world's first concrete based floating solar power plant", however this notability does not seem to be able to be verified, as I'm unable to locate sources for verification. Also, the only hit that "Ajay Thomas" receives is this: [9], which does not refer to the subject of this article. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 18:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:33, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Same reasons as
last time. No indication of
notability per
WP:BIO and no citations to
reliable sources that are
independent of the subject.
Ahecht (
TALK
PAGE)
17:48, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Move to aircraft bridge and rewrite accordingly. Sandstein 16:19, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Airport taxiway bridges are not notable. Half the page is written as an advert for the architect and engineers of record. The only link to the page is from the architect's page. Millbrooky ( talk) 15:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 11:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Subject is an obscure award, with virtually no independant mainstream RS coverage. Cited sources are almost entirely affiliated with the industry/award and fail WP:RS. Subject ultimately fails GNG. See also this related discussion. Ad Orientem ( talk) 14:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of stars in Pisces. czar 05:05, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
The article makes no claim to notability for this star under WP:NASTRO and I can find nothing notable about it. Lithopsian ( talk) 19:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 16:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Not notable. There is some dispute over whether the show even aired. ubiquity ( talk) 20:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 00:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and has no reliable coverage from third-party sources. Doing a search for "Apex Online Racing" brings up only forum posts and other unreliable material. This is the best I could find throughout my searches, and it's a summary of their app.
I also propose that the following are discussed too:
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Failed PROD. Reason: Unsourced BLP since article creation in 2009. Fails WP:NACTOR (only notable role was supporting role on Harper's Island, which alone does not satisfy NACTOR), and fails WP:GNG outright (only a couple of passing mentions in regards to Harper's Island and Nightmare at the End of the Hall in Variety and THR, and no other significant mentions anywhere). -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 15:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. It seems that nobody actually wants to keep this, despite the lengthy discussion? Sandstein 16:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
This page has multiple issues and has had the "multiple issues" template for over a year. It has no sources, and the stated inclusion criteria is subjective and arbitrary. Shelbystripes ( talk) 15:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:24, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Not only have my searches not found anything actually substantial, there's nothing at all here or at Hungarian Wiki, only their own links listed and my searches simply found a few mentions including for events thus there's nothing convincing. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 02:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
My searches are simply not finding anything actually substantially convincing, there's nothing to suggest there's the noticeable independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 00:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
The article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. The only sources listed on the article are self-promoting. Unable to find any substantive independent coverage of the subject. Nominated for Speedy in the past and previously listed at AfD with the result of softdelete due to lack of participation. Pax Verbum 04:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
No prejudice against recreation if new reliable sources surface that provide significant coverage of the subject.
The result was redirect to www.tism.wanker.com. czar 05:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 03:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. czar 05:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Article has become a cruft magnet littered with some rather questionable entries ( most of which were removed here). Electric Burst( Electron firings)( Zaps) 02:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 11:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to satisfy the notability criteria. FamblyCat94 ( talk) 02:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Clear G11 , promotional editing by COI editor. DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Currently there are no reliable sources listed as to why this person is notable. A quick search query on Google found no Reliable sources indicating Notability. Self promotion to boot. VViking Talk Edits 13:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
I am still working on the references, and how to have them done this week or next. I was out of the country for a couple of weeks and have just returned. I have intentionally written the article in a third voice and endeavored to be neutral and factual. The article contains many outside links to confirm the validity of the facts stated, and I am working on the References section. This seems to satisfy the overall goal desired in avoiding self-authorship. I hope you agree. NNicholaou ( talk) 14:14, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
I had added a number of books I've contributed to and referenced them at Amazon, but those have been deleted by VViking. I speak at about 20 national and regional conferences each year and have been published in print more than 400 times. There are nearly 200 of my print articles available on our website for free (www.mbsinc.com), so this is not self-promotion to make a buck. Rather, it is to help more folks seeking help. I have become one of the chief IT strategists for IT in churches and ministries, and believe this page helps those looking for credible content. I hope you agree. More edits coming from others, including publishers, soon. (May I put those books back?) NNicholaou ( talk) 20:22, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete per OP. 142.105.159.60 ( talk) 03:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 02:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 13:55, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. The external links say nothing about this subject. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 13:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#A7. I told Class455fan1 to AfD it, but then changed my mind. In fact the article might be a borderline WP:CSD#G3 in places. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:31, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Non Notable person. Also Autobiographical as the creator is the subject, which i found out when i researched this person. None of the sources mentioned contain "Wesley Spartan" anywhere (One is a blog, so is unreliable). Class455fan1 ( talk) 12:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G3 blatant hoax. JohnCD ( talk) 09:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This article sounds like a hoax. Sources don't match what the article says, and it seems this dish does not even exist. Googling "Gakhain makh orooson" only leads to this article, no mention elsewhere. This is a blatant hoax TheCoffeeAddict talk| contribs 11:25, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to List of Autobots#Cyberjets. Or wherever subsequent discussion may determine Sandstein 16:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Substub on a toy line. No evidence of notability and no sources cited. A prod was contested with the mystifying claim that this is acting as a disambiguation page "of sorts". Josh Milburn ( talk) 16:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Subject is a graduate with an interest in poetry. No evidence of general notability. Imaginatorium ( talk) 09:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Favonian ( talk) 15:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:MUSBIO and WP:NACTOR : I fail to find any coverage in reliable sources about the album/single or award nomination (except this) also there is no source to support actor or recording producer. The article was created by a sock of Mnaqvii. Thank You – GSS ( talk) 09:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. blatant spam, salted now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable company, unsourced. Article has been speedied 3 times and re-created. Time to delete and Salt. Pam D 08:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 07:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Funimation voice actor notable for Kizaru in One Piece, which is a supporting role. And that's about it. WP:TOOSOON. Does not meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Not a regular on ANN or the Anime conventions circuit. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 05:54, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. Michig ( talk) 07:09, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR. Her work is exclusive to a book series that does never have a separate Wikipedia article, and as of now it seems the major thing possibly notable of her is her death. I'd say we either delete or rename to Death of Helen Bailey, as the person by herself isn't necessarily notable. Rusted AutoParts 05:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
References
The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 21:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP, with some advertorial overtones, of a person who is notable only as a local media personality in a single midsized media market, and who is referenced only to a single deadlinked article in a local community weekly newspaper. This is not a claim of notability that gives a person automatic inclusion rights on Wikipedia -- if he could be sourced over WP:GNG for it there would be a case for inclusion, but the referencing here fails to accomplish that. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 05:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. There is clear consensus to not keep this as a stand-alone article. Beyond that, opinion is evenly split between an outright delete and redirecting is somewhere. Normally, I would be inclined to go with the redirect, per WP:ATD, but in this case, the most commonly suggested redirect target, Eurasianism#Greater Russia, has already been removed, as WP:SYNTH. So, I'm going to go with the straight delete here. Anybody can recreate this as a redirect, if they can find a reasonable target to redirect it to (with the understanding, of course, that reasonable can be tricky to define, and might have to be defended at XfD). -- RoySmith (talk) 02:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Wild original research. There is no such concept in Russian culture. 'Velikorossiya' ? - It is something else. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:09, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a musician whose claims to passing WP:NMUSIC are sourced entirely to social networking platforms, YouTube videos, iTunes and blogs. As always, a musician is not automatically entitled to coverage in Wikipedia just because he exists -- he must be the subject of reliable source coverage which properly verifies an NMUSIC pass, but out of 28 citations here, not even one of them is to a reliable source. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:46, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:27, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a rapper with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, which is referenced entirely to his own self-published social networking content about himself with not a shred of reliable source coverage shown. Also conflict of interest, as the article was created by an editor whose username corresponds to the article subject's claimed real name. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. North America 1000 00:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable fashion label. Source in article is a 2 minute video from a minor news TV station superficially covering the business, and I couldn't find any other really reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. ~ | twsx | talk cont | ~ 04:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn. NasssaNser 02:18, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:NF, can't be attributed to reliable sources. NasssaNser 04:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. After three relists, consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 talk 16:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
This article was created by a blocked paid editor without disclosing his paid edits and in violation of wikipedia terms of service. Overtime, the article was turned into a PR piece and added with PR sources which have been eventually removed. After pruning of the article for ineligible content by experienced editors, it is left with no sources, a few self publications and a one line intro. Obviously the article does not meet up the notability criteria and should be deleted. All searches that come up on google are PR pieces, self published books and other promotional material. The few news reports that come up are bare mentions or quotations without indepth coverage of subject. As far as this article will exist, editors and administrators will be wasting their time protecting an ineligible article from promotion attempts. The purpose of this article appears to make the name come up on top on google search to promote the subject which is not an allowed use of wikipedia.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Delete. One among the lakhs of district magistrates in India. Fails WP:BIO Uncletomwood ( talk) 09:31, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. JohnCD ( talk) 08:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Article was prodded with rationale: "Subject is a young footballer who has not yet played in a fully professional league or at senior international level, so fails the sport-specific notability guideline, and about whom there's no evidence of enough non-routine independent significant coverage to satisfy the general notability guideline." PROD removed by creator, with edit summary "May fail WP:NFOOTY but surely does not fail WP:BIO. There has been much media hype circling around this player and has a professional contract with Arsenal for the third year." I'd suggest that the reports of Arsenal reportedly beating Man Utd to signing the player on scholarship terms are just that: media hype, with nowhere near enough solid content to pass WP:BIO. Struway2 ( talk) 08:22, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect restored by article creator. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 18:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
Not notable. Only sourced to some blog, but even if it were properly sourced the “trapezoid height“ or any particular derivation of it is not independently notable. Should redirect to Trapezoid, e.g. to Trapezoid#Midsegment and height. JohnBlackburne words deeds 02:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
What under what criterion of notability does this fail? You are not being specific. It should not redirect to Trapezoid#Midsegment and height because there the statement of the fact is given without proof. Please give your argument with respect to the definition. Under what definition is a forum about math an invalid source? In fact, by your argument the image of a visual proof of the Pythagorean theorem uploaded by you and linked through your talk page is not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.219.24 ( talk) 03:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:56, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't seem to satisfy WP:ARTIST. I don't see much out there about him, and the two galleries specified where he exhibited are redlinked. Clarityfiend ( talk) 02:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a hoax/deliberate mischief. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:01, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
No references found for this supposed film or the equally dubious series. This is the only credit from the article's creator, and it appears to be an April Fool's joke (for example, the original version also included a misleading wikilink that actually logged users out of Wikipedia). In any case, the apparent hoax fails WP:V. Calamondin12 ( talk) 02:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Moved to Draft:Particle teleportation. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:04, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
This article has only one reference, a fringe paper by one scientist, and there is no evidence that this concept has been given serious discussion by other scientists. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as a hoax. I guess I'll move this to the museum just because it lasted so long. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
No references exist anywhere online for this supposed HBO miniseries. The article was created by an IP in 2005, and the only other contribution from this user was an edit to HBO's page adding this entry and the well-known John Adams (miniseries) to its list of programming. Upcoming programming on a major channel like HBO typically draws fairly broad coverage, with announcements about the cast and other details released many months before the show makes its on-air premiere; the absence of any such material suggests that HBO never worked on this show at all or abandoned the project at an extremely early stage in its development. This could conceivably be an intentional hoax (in which case it would be the longest-lived hoax yet found on Wikipedia), but even if that isn't the case, the article fails WP:V. Calamondin12 ( talk) 02:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 06:52, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
We only seem to have massive lists like List of aircraft manufacturers B-C, which isn't sortable. This new list is, but I can't help but think "Commercial-Business Passenger airplanes manufacturer Companies By Production Approx Passenger Capacity Range" is a fairly incomprehensible and WP:Indiscriminate concept for a standalone list. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)