The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
A biography of a quack which has been toned down to be less promotional, but still every single source is either primary, unreliable, or in some cases both. There are no reliable independent sources discussing the subject - the closes we get is a quote or two. Guy ( Help!) 23:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete. User:AChrisTurner, I think you are wasting your time. The subject is not notable and it is not an article. It is an advertisement littered with many unreliable sources. The first source points to the Palmer College of Chiropractic. It gets worse after that. QuackGuru ( talk) 01:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
can't really see anything notable. was a tv presenter for a few years in the 90s. now gets a little bit of coverage in non-notable websites related to property venture Rayman60 ( talk) 21:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE. This interview on a fairly obscure and specialist website is the only source I can find that directly addresses the subject. The other references cited are mere mentions and searches in google news, book and factiva have not turned up anything better. SmartSE ( talk) 20:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Most sources don't cover Autistic Pride Day in depth, and it is hard to find reliable sources on it. Ylevental ( talk) 20:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
The article isn't notable and is basically a type of a Die-cast toy made by several different companies. – Nascar1996 ( talk • cont) 20:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
As a notable event, this doesn't seem notable enough to pass WP:GNG. Also, with the lack of references establishing notability, this article seems like a WP:NOTWIKIA violation. Also, the article Pokémon already includes a couple of brief mentions of the fact that the Pokémon franchise recently celebrated its 20th anniversary, which seems to be about as notable as this event seems to be. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
(in wikia, admins of central community would consider that user as a sock puppet) [n.b.: Wikia is also a part of wikimedia] Prompri ( talk) 12:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Most of the information in this article is in the book Look Me in the Eye and should be merged into this article. Relies too heavily on self-published sources. Ylevental ( talk) 19:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
I am John Elder Robison, the subject of this article and page. I distressed to find that user Leventhal has seemingly mounted a campaign to destroy the usefulness of the page. I see some things have been removed for lack of citations, and other things on the page are wrong.
First of all, I see the information about my work in music was deleted for lack of references. The story of my work with KISS and Britannia Row (Pink Floyd's sound company in the 70s) was told in my book Look Me in the Eye and it's widely discussed online, etc. This link goes to a blog post of mine that offers some facts and photos of me and my work from that period. You are welcome to use the photos of me, my son, my late ex-wife, and my KISS stuff including my photo ID under the Wikimedia Creative Commons license on my page. http://jerobison.blogspot.com/p/the-kiss-guitars-and-my-life-in-music.html
The article says I was married twice. Actually I was married three times. 1st - Mary Lee Trompke (died 2014) who is the mother of my son Jack "Cubby" Robison 2nd - Martha Schuette who still owns Robison Service with me. 3rd - Maripat Jordan - writer and neurodiversity activist
The article also has at times said I am self-diagnosed. That is incorrect and it's an important error to fix. I was diagnosed by a therapist friend at age 40, as described in the chapter "A Diagnosis at Forty" in Look Me in the Eye. Later, when I joined various autism research studies, I was diagnosed using the "gold standard" ADOS screening tools at Harvard Medical School and the University of Pennsylvania autism clinic. I have also been diagnosed using both conventional and experimental techniques at other institutions in the USA and Europe.
The article has said at various times that I "Worked for Autism Speaks." That is not true. I was a member of the science board from 2008-2013 and resigned in protest after the founder made remarks that I felt were offensive to autistic people. That resignation letter is widely circulated online and cited in my page. I was never an AS employee; I was a volunteer board member.
Leventhal has also attacked the Wikipedia pages for Look Me in the Eye, and other places I am mentioned. I see most of the foreign editions of my book have been removed for "lack of citation" What sort of proof is expected, beyond a name and a publisher? I am going to post the names and publishers, and photos here as soon as I figure out how to put up photos.
I'd be happy to talk to any of you who are interested in constructive editing of this page. You can write me through Wikipedia mail or you can look me up on the William & Mary neurodiversity page.
Thanks John Elder Robison JohnElderRobison ( talk) 00:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
-- JohnElderRobison ( talk) 23:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Author deleted PROD, so moving to AfD. Fails WP:FILMNOT -- only second-party coverage is brief and only in small mostly-local publications. IagoQnsi ( talk) 19:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G11 -- this is just advertising for them DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Author deleted PROD tag, so moving to AfD. No indication of notability here -- only claim of significance is winning a couple small local awards. IagoQnsi ( talk) 19:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn as first commenter figured out that these were copied from existing articles, making them A10 speedies. Bearcat ( talk) 19:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Two articles which list what I'm presuming are the #1 singles on a pop chart, but which completely fail to specify or source what pop chart they hit #1 on. This is a type of article that we do allow for certain notable charts that pass WP:CHARTS, if the information in them can be referenced as accurate -- but if the article is unsourced, and doesn't even contain enough context for us to determine whether the chart in question is a notable one or an individual radio station or a user's own self-created blogchart, then that's not an article we can keep. Delete, unless somebody can actually figure out what chart is involved here. Bearcat ( talk) 18:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
The coverage in the media of WrongPlanet is generally repetitive and trivial. It would be better to merge the information into the Alex Plank article, since most of the articles are about Plank. Ylevental ( talk) 18:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus. I have also reverted the move of Aryan Khan. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Only claim to fame is being the child of a movie star; however, this is not enough to warrant an independent article (just ask Brooklyn Beckham). The article talks a lot about Aryan Khan being "destined" to be a star, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so he should not have his own article until he actually is a star. Also, even if the article were to be kept, it is horrendously promotional in tone, to the point where I think it'd be hard to salvage it into a decent article without just doing a rewrite. IagoQnsi ( talk) 18:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
There is only one significant article focusing on her, and Huffington Post might not even be a reliable source. Ylevental ( talk) 17:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by DESiegel, CSD A11: Article about a subject obviously invented by article creator or associate. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
This so-called Tunisian Latin alphabet seems to be the creation of its sole contributor on Wikipedia. It falsely claims to be one of the two writing systems for writing Tunisian Arabic yet has no sources to corroborate the claim. Although the article has certainly been written in good faith, it fails to meet notability criteria and is WP:OR. Abjiklɐm ( tɐlk) 17:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as although further comments would've been welcomed and beneficial, the current article seems acceptable enough with convincing enough sources to keep for now (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 07:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Relies too much on primary sources. Most of ASAN is composed of Ari Ne'eman and it would be better to merge the information into his article. No articles and books significantly focusing on this organization. Ylevental ( talk) 17:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted, CSD G5: Created by a banned or blocked user ( Profile101) in violation of ban or block. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Written by a sock, appears to be written like an essay with plenty of original research. Appears to be copied from an OR website: https://publictransportsg.wordpress.com/government-contracting-model/ Nordic Dragon 16:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Nonnotable business. Claims of notability are a couple of local "business of the year" awards. However the article texts says nothing concrete what makes this company encyclopedic. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per CSD A10. Duplicate of Syed Qazi Muzainul Haq that does not expand upon, detail or improve information about the subject. North America 1000 12:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
copied from Syed Qazi Muzainul Haq Captain Spark ( talk) 14:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
He is a recent time islamic scholar, thats what make him notable.He was Imam e Jumah at Wasa Dargah.He translated Zarb e Yyadullahi in Hindi and worked towards humanity.He was supporter of unity of Islam and unoty among different religions of Islam. üser:Altenmann >t 15:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America 1000 12:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Reference links are broken Prof TPMS ( talk) 14:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. A10 of Sweetie (internet avatar) or A2 of NL:Wikipedia Jac16888 Talk 18:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
It is not written in English Prof TPMS ( talk) 14:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Page holds absolutely no reliable sources and is composed of complete original research and fan-cruft information composed by a user. livelikemusic talk! 14:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Page holds absolutely no reliable sources and is composed of complete original research and fan-cruft information composed by a user. Page also could be seen as a less-than effective version of the General Hospital cast members page, and the sub-divison character pages. livelikemusic talk! 14:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't see evidence that this is a notable business, meeting either WP:GNG or WP:CORP. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Relevant discussion at | →
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviostart → Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baltic Jet Aircompany |
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable company. No coverage meeting WP:GNG. No notability under WP:CORP. No indication of significance in the article. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Relevant discussion at | →
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviostart → Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aero Charter |
The result was merge to Bloody Roar#Characters. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) None of its sources discuss characters of the series as a topic, and there doesn't appear to be anything that could help in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. A redirect or selective merge to the series article ( Bloody Roar#Characters) could suffice, but there's no reason to split out in this much primary source detail without secondary source coverage as justification for the split. czar 13:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This article achieves superficial referenciness by using links to, for example, Amazon sales pages. There are no substantive sources here, and the only significant non-promotional edit I can find in the history is stubbing by @ DGG:. Guy ( Help!) 11:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 12:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 10:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This article has no reliable independent sources. It has a publisher's resume (not independent) and claim of one paper being much cited, for which the source is the paper itself. It claims he has published "more than 17" (how many? 18?), but fewer than 20 published papers is not a lot, frankly. Guy ( Help!) 11:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Overly Promotional article for non notable entrepreneur. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Year Up for his organisation. Claim of bestselling is not sourced. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Of the current sourcing: 1. NYTimes is an article by him, not about him. 2-5. His orgs website, not independent. 6. Not a reliable source. 7. Press release. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to HIT 107. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not here for self promotion. Not notable. Lacks coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn -- intgr [talk] 11:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
No notability Prof TPMS ( talk) 10:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
-- Prof TPMS ( talk) 11:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
The article fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Besides, Maliaros only appeared in one movie. Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 07:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-amin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 16:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
His list of credits is too skinny to satisfy WP:NACTOR. He's mentioned in an LA Times article about his son. That's about it. Clarityfiend ( talk) 22:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep. The article could certainly use some improvement, but his part in Weird Science alone makes him notable. It's an iconic scene. 161.113.11.16 ( talk) 18:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 23:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable cartoon, fails WP:GNG and WP:BROADCAST JMHamo ( talk) 22:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tactical Technology Collective. MBisanz talk 02:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability Dweller ( talk) 13:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
I have searched extensively, and failed to finds any evidence that this subject comes near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I found a download site which stores Netflix Falcor, blog posts, a page asking for help in developing Netflix Falcor, a page on a website which exists to publicise "Internet-based application programming interfaces", Twitter, YouTube, etc, but nothing like the sort of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources needed. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 11:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Regarding to what :@ JamesBWatson: have said let me provide big picture of the Falcor.JS. The library is non-profit, open-source project. It has 1700 commits (and a lots of lines of code) to it's GH repo: https://github.com/Netflix/falcor/commits/master , the library is in production on the Netflix's main website and the developers from netflix has open-sourced that library last year. From my perspective, I have googled and didn't find any wikipedia entry on that topic so I added one few days ago. The Falcor Netlix is non-commerce open-source library. About myself: I am a javascript developer, this is my github profile -> https://github.com/przeor/ ... I am NOT ASSOCIATED with Netflix and I use the Falcor.js in my project. I think it may be useful covered this topic of open-source library on Wikipedia as I find this library very useful. Przeor1989 ( talk) 12:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
My summary shows that this article shall be recovered and saved on the Wiki.
The story, short: 1) my mistake was that I did copyrights mistake which was edited in 30 minutes from releasing initial writing 2) Before I corrected the article, it has been nominated to speedy deletion and deleted by @ JamesBWatson: 3) After a discussion on @ JamesBWatson: discussion page, he reversed the deletion 4) We are on that topic now for "Articles deletion" because all articles recovered from deletion have to be discussed by wider community
In that deletion's discussion we have proved that: a) The article has the notability (check above) b) The article's topic is mature and NOT too soon (this library is almost 3 years old and also please check that above the Falcor's library is in "100 top most popular" on GitHub - please remember that there are over 100 000 javascript libraries and this Netflix Falcor library is in top one hundred !!!)
Hope it helps.
Regards, Kamil :-) Przeor1989 ( talk) Przeor1989 ( talk) 09:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Fail WP:SOLDIER. Is the award of the LVO enough to make him notable? Gbawden ( talk) 09:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Possibly not but being Chief of Staff Headquarters Army Air Corps plus LVO and OBE might be if sources could be added. Philafrenzy ( talk) 11:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This article reads very much like an opinion or essay. Believe it fails WP:NOTADVICE and WP:ESSAY. I work in this field and this article isn't encylcopedic Gbawden ( talk) 09:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Venu Sree Raam. Note that the nominator stated in part in a later comment, "While I would not object to a redirect being left... (et al.). North America 1000 20:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Classic example of why films that have not yet begun production should NOT have their own article. Evidently, the primary actor has walked out, at least temporarily, on compensation issues and production is on an indefinite hiatus. Too early for this article and fails WP:NFILMS. Perhaps if/when production resumes and principle photography is completed, then may be the time to consider starting an article. Clearly now is NOT the time. Safiel ( talk) 07:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:ENT. Looked for more substantial sources and found nothing. Roles in major films are very minor: "President of the Phoenix Fraternity" and "Nervous Intern". He was only a stand-in for 27 Dresses.
Theatrical roles are for local/touring productions of older works with no indication of length or significance supported by sources.
There is an unrelated reporter/photographer named Brett Leigh Dicks, which may be a stumbling block when searching for sources. Grayfell ( talk) 07:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
In 2011, Leigh starred and directed independent film "Festival." He appeared in an episode of "The Young and the Restless" in 2013 as "Handsy." In 2014, Leigh played "Abraham Lincoln" in an episode of Nickelodeon's iCarly. He played a major role as the antagonist in the Lifetime movie "The Spirit of Christmas" in 2015. He plays "Jack Lemmon" in the film "Near Myth: The Oskar Knight Story," which has been completed and is set for theatrical release in 2016. Reference: NY Times and Rotten Tomatoes.
I wouldn't classify his role in the "Social Network" as "very minor." He carries most of the lines for several minutes during the scene with Andrew Garfield. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colson7012 ( talk • contribs) 09:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
There is no reliable source. This page was created by a user with same surname as the page. It was requested for speedy deletion as the page history shows, but another user removed the tag. Captain Spark ( talk) 01:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Consensus is that the sources clearly support notability of the subject. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 16:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Liberal socialism makes no intellectual sense, at all. It's complete bullshit. Anyone with half a brain and a drive to study socialist literature understands this: that socialism is incompatible with liberalism. This article shouldn't exist, it's ridiculous. I propose that this article is to be deleted after we combine useful content with the welfare capitalism and social democracy articles. The liberal socialism article is in direction contradiction to the socialism, capitalism, mixed economy, social democracy, welfare capitalism, and democratic socialism articles. None of these articles support the idea of socialism being compatible with liberalism, or the idea of mixing socialism and capitalism. All of these articles at the moment do accept that socialism can arise from capitalism either through revolution or through gradual change. None of these articles claim that you can have both at the same time. The social democracy and welfare capitalism articles literally describe everything that is in this article, yet this article stands in contradiction. Unless everything else is wrong, it makes no sense to maintain this article. Thank you. SpaceMilk ( talk) 01:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
I have been unable to find references to show that this artist meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. The award he won is for local volunteer work. Unless an editor more familiar with sports art can find independent published material about this subject, the article should deleted. — Anne Delong ( talk) 00:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
A biography of a quack which has been toned down to be less promotional, but still every single source is either primary, unreliable, or in some cases both. There are no reliable independent sources discussing the subject - the closes we get is a quote or two. Guy ( Help!) 23:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete. User:AChrisTurner, I think you are wasting your time. The subject is not notable and it is not an article. It is an advertisement littered with many unreliable sources. The first source points to the Palmer College of Chiropractic. It gets worse after that. QuackGuru ( talk) 01:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 02:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
can't really see anything notable. was a tv presenter for a few years in the 90s. now gets a little bit of coverage in non-notable websites related to property venture Rayman60 ( talk) 21:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Fails to meet WP:BIO or WP:CREATIVE. This interview on a fairly obscure and specialist website is the only source I can find that directly addresses the subject. The other references cited are mere mentions and searches in google news, book and factiva have not turned up anything better. SmartSE ( talk) 20:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Most sources don't cover Autistic Pride Day in depth, and it is hard to find reliable sources on it. Ylevental ( talk) 20:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
The article isn't notable and is basically a type of a Die-cast toy made by several different companies. – Nascar1996 ( talk • cont) 20:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:31, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
As a notable event, this doesn't seem notable enough to pass WP:GNG. Also, with the lack of references establishing notability, this article seems like a WP:NOTWIKIA violation. Also, the article Pokémon already includes a couple of brief mentions of the fact that the Pokémon franchise recently celebrated its 20th anniversary, which seems to be about as notable as this event seems to be. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
(in wikia, admins of central community would consider that user as a sock puppet) [n.b.: Wikia is also a part of wikimedia] Prompri ( talk) 12:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Most of the information in this article is in the book Look Me in the Eye and should be merged into this article. Relies too heavily on self-published sources. Ylevental ( talk) 19:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
I am John Elder Robison, the subject of this article and page. I distressed to find that user Leventhal has seemingly mounted a campaign to destroy the usefulness of the page. I see some things have been removed for lack of citations, and other things on the page are wrong.
First of all, I see the information about my work in music was deleted for lack of references. The story of my work with KISS and Britannia Row (Pink Floyd's sound company in the 70s) was told in my book Look Me in the Eye and it's widely discussed online, etc. This link goes to a blog post of mine that offers some facts and photos of me and my work from that period. You are welcome to use the photos of me, my son, my late ex-wife, and my KISS stuff including my photo ID under the Wikimedia Creative Commons license on my page. http://jerobison.blogspot.com/p/the-kiss-guitars-and-my-life-in-music.html
The article says I was married twice. Actually I was married three times. 1st - Mary Lee Trompke (died 2014) who is the mother of my son Jack "Cubby" Robison 2nd - Martha Schuette who still owns Robison Service with me. 3rd - Maripat Jordan - writer and neurodiversity activist
The article also has at times said I am self-diagnosed. That is incorrect and it's an important error to fix. I was diagnosed by a therapist friend at age 40, as described in the chapter "A Diagnosis at Forty" in Look Me in the Eye. Later, when I joined various autism research studies, I was diagnosed using the "gold standard" ADOS screening tools at Harvard Medical School and the University of Pennsylvania autism clinic. I have also been diagnosed using both conventional and experimental techniques at other institutions in the USA and Europe.
The article has said at various times that I "Worked for Autism Speaks." That is not true. I was a member of the science board from 2008-2013 and resigned in protest after the founder made remarks that I felt were offensive to autistic people. That resignation letter is widely circulated online and cited in my page. I was never an AS employee; I was a volunteer board member.
Leventhal has also attacked the Wikipedia pages for Look Me in the Eye, and other places I am mentioned. I see most of the foreign editions of my book have been removed for "lack of citation" What sort of proof is expected, beyond a name and a publisher? I am going to post the names and publishers, and photos here as soon as I figure out how to put up photos.
I'd be happy to talk to any of you who are interested in constructive editing of this page. You can write me through Wikipedia mail or you can look me up on the William & Mary neurodiversity page.
Thanks John Elder Robison JohnElderRobison ( talk) 00:15, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
-- JohnElderRobison ( talk) 23:56, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Author deleted PROD, so moving to AfD. Fails WP:FILMNOT -- only second-party coverage is brief and only in small mostly-local publications. IagoQnsi ( talk) 19:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. G11 -- this is just advertising for them DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Author deleted PROD tag, so moving to AfD. No indication of notability here -- only claim of significance is winning a couple small local awards. IagoQnsi ( talk) 19:03, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn as first commenter figured out that these were copied from existing articles, making them A10 speedies. Bearcat ( talk) 19:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Two articles which list what I'm presuming are the #1 singles on a pop chart, but which completely fail to specify or source what pop chart they hit #1 on. This is a type of article that we do allow for certain notable charts that pass WP:CHARTS, if the information in them can be referenced as accurate -- but if the article is unsourced, and doesn't even contain enough context for us to determine whether the chart in question is a notable one or an individual radio station or a user's own self-created blogchart, then that's not an article we can keep. Delete, unless somebody can actually figure out what chart is involved here. Bearcat ( talk) 18:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
The coverage in the media of WrongPlanet is generally repetitive and trivial. It would be better to merge the information into the Alex Plank article, since most of the articles are about Plank. Ylevental ( talk) 18:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sufficient consensus. I have also reverted the move of Aryan Khan. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 20:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Only claim to fame is being the child of a movie star; however, this is not enough to warrant an independent article (just ask Brooklyn Beckham). The article talks a lot about Aryan Khan being "destined" to be a star, but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, so he should not have his own article until he actually is a star. Also, even if the article were to be kept, it is horrendously promotional in tone, to the point where I think it'd be hard to salvage it into a decent article without just doing a rewrite. IagoQnsi ( talk) 18:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 09:37, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
There is only one significant article focusing on her, and Huffington Post might not even be a reliable source. Ylevental ( talk) 17:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted by DESiegel, CSD A11: Article about a subject obviously invented by article creator or associate. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
This so-called Tunisian Latin alphabet seems to be the creation of its sole contributor on Wikipedia. It falsely claims to be one of the two writing systems for writing Tunisian Arabic yet has no sources to corroborate the claim. Although the article has certainly been written in good faith, it fails to meet notability criteria and is WP:OR. Abjiklɐm ( tɐlk) 17:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep as although further comments would've been welcomed and beneficial, the current article seems acceptable enough with convincing enough sources to keep for now (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 07:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Relies too much on primary sources. Most of ASAN is composed of Ari Ne'eman and it would be better to merge the information into his article. No articles and books significantly focusing on this organization. Ylevental ( talk) 17:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted, CSD G5: Created by a banned or blocked user ( Profile101) in violation of ban or block. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Written by a sock, appears to be written like an essay with plenty of original research. Appears to be copied from an OR website: https://publictransportsg.wordpress.com/government-contracting-model/ Nordic Dragon 16:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Nonnotable business. Claims of notability are a couple of local "business of the year" awards. However the article texts says nothing concrete what makes this company encyclopedic. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete per CSD A10. Duplicate of Syed Qazi Muzainul Haq that does not expand upon, detail or improve information about the subject. North America 1000 12:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
copied from Syed Qazi Muzainul Haq Captain Spark ( talk) 14:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
He is a recent time islamic scholar, thats what make him notable.He was Imam e Jumah at Wasa Dargah.He translated Zarb e Yyadullahi in Hindi and worked towards humanity.He was supporter of unity of Islam and unoty among different religions of Islam. üser:Altenmann >t 15:47, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. A valid rationale for deletion has not been presented. For examples of valid deletion rationales, see WP:DEL-REASON. North America 1000 12:45, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Reference links are broken Prof TPMS ( talk) 14:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. A10 of Sweetie (internet avatar) or A2 of NL:Wikipedia Jac16888 Talk 18:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
It is not written in English Prof TPMS ( talk) 14:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Page holds absolutely no reliable sources and is composed of complete original research and fan-cruft information composed by a user. livelikemusic talk! 14:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Page holds absolutely no reliable sources and is composed of complete original research and fan-cruft information composed by a user. Page also could be seen as a less-than effective version of the General Hospital cast members page, and the sub-divison character pages. livelikemusic talk! 14:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't see evidence that this is a notable business, meeting either WP:GNG or WP:CORP. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Relevant discussion at | →
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviostart → Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baltic Jet Aircompany |
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable company. No coverage meeting WP:GNG. No notability under WP:CORP. No indication of significance in the article. —Largo Plazo ( talk) 13:53, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Relevant discussion at | →
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviostart → Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aero Charter |
The result was merge to Bloody Roar#Characters. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) None of its sources discuss characters of the series as a topic, and there doesn't appear to be anything that could help in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. A redirect or selective merge to the series article ( Bloody Roar#Characters) could suffice, but there's no reason to split out in this much primary source detail without secondary source coverage as justification for the split. czar 13:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:26, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This article achieves superficial referenciness by using links to, for example, Amazon sales pages. There are no substantive sources here, and the only significant non-promotional edit I can find in the history is stubbing by @ DGG:. Guy ( Help!) 11:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 12:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 10:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This article has no reliable independent sources. It has a publisher's resume (not independent) and claim of one paper being much cited, for which the source is the paper itself. It claims he has published "more than 17" (how many? 18?), but fewer than 20 published papers is not a lot, frankly. Guy ( Help!) 11:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Overly Promotional article for non notable entrepreneur. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Year Up for his organisation. Claim of bestselling is not sourced. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Of the current sourcing: 1. NYTimes is an article by him, not about him. 2-5. His orgs website, not independent. 6. Not a reliable source. 7. Press release. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:44, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to HIT 107. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not here for self promotion. Not notable. Lacks coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was Nomination withdrawn -- intgr [talk] 11:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
No notability Prof TPMS ( talk) 10:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
-- Prof TPMS ( talk) 11:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
The article fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Besides, Maliaros only appeared in one movie. Hitcher vs. Candyman ( talk) 07:24, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-amin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 16:36, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
His list of credits is too skinny to satisfy WP:NACTOR. He's mentioned in an LA Times article about his son. That's about it. Clarityfiend ( talk) 22:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Keep. The article could certainly use some improvement, but his part in Weird Science alone makes him notable. It's an iconic scene. 161.113.11.16 ( talk) 18:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 23:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable cartoon, fails WP:GNG and WP:BROADCAST JMHamo ( talk) 22:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Tactical Technology Collective. MBisanz talk 02:32, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability Dweller ( talk) 13:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 22:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
I have searched extensively, and failed to finds any evidence that this subject comes near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I found a download site which stores Netflix Falcor, blog posts, a page asking for help in developing Netflix Falcor, a page on a website which exists to publicise "Internet-based application programming interfaces", Twitter, YouTube, etc, but nothing like the sort of substantial coverage in reliable independent sources needed. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 11:58, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Regarding to what :@ JamesBWatson: have said let me provide big picture of the Falcor.JS. The library is non-profit, open-source project. It has 1700 commits (and a lots of lines of code) to it's GH repo: https://github.com/Netflix/falcor/commits/master , the library is in production on the Netflix's main website and the developers from netflix has open-sourced that library last year. From my perspective, I have googled and didn't find any wikipedia entry on that topic so I added one few days ago. The Falcor Netlix is non-commerce open-source library. About myself: I am a javascript developer, this is my github profile -> https://github.com/przeor/ ... I am NOT ASSOCIATED with Netflix and I use the Falcor.js in my project. I think it may be useful covered this topic of open-source library on Wikipedia as I find this library very useful. Przeor1989 ( talk) 12:45, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
My summary shows that this article shall be recovered and saved on the Wiki.
The story, short: 1) my mistake was that I did copyrights mistake which was edited in 30 minutes from releasing initial writing 2) Before I corrected the article, it has been nominated to speedy deletion and deleted by @ JamesBWatson: 3) After a discussion on @ JamesBWatson: discussion page, he reversed the deletion 4) We are on that topic now for "Articles deletion" because all articles recovered from deletion have to be discussed by wider community
In that deletion's discussion we have proved that: a) The article has the notability (check above) b) The article's topic is mature and NOT too soon (this library is almost 3 years old and also please check that above the Falcor's library is in "100 top most popular" on GitHub - please remember that there are over 100 000 javascript libraries and this Netflix Falcor library is in top one hundred !!!)
Hope it helps.
Regards, Kamil :-) Przeor1989 ( talk) Przeor1989 ( talk) 09:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:23, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Fail WP:SOLDIER. Is the award of the LVO enough to make him notable? Gbawden ( talk) 09:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Possibly not but being Chief of Staff Headquarters Army Air Corps plus LVO and OBE might be if sources could be added. Philafrenzy ( talk) 11:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:22, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
This article reads very much like an opinion or essay. Believe it fails WP:NOTADVICE and WP:ESSAY. I work in this field and this article isn't encylcopedic Gbawden ( talk) 09:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Venu Sree Raam. Note that the nominator stated in part in a later comment, "While I would not object to a redirect being left... (et al.). North America 1000 20:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Classic example of why films that have not yet begun production should NOT have their own article. Evidently, the primary actor has walked out, at least temporarily, on compensation issues and production is on an indefinite hiatus. Too early for this article and fails WP:NFILMS. Perhaps if/when production resumes and principle photography is completed, then may be the time to consider starting an article. Clearly now is NOT the time. Safiel ( talk) 07:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 ( talk) 11:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to meet WP:ENT. Looked for more substantial sources and found nothing. Roles in major films are very minor: "President of the Phoenix Fraternity" and "Nervous Intern". He was only a stand-in for 27 Dresses.
Theatrical roles are for local/touring productions of older works with no indication of length or significance supported by sources.
There is an unrelated reporter/photographer named Brett Leigh Dicks, which may be a stumbling block when searching for sources. Grayfell ( talk) 07:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
In 2011, Leigh starred and directed independent film "Festival." He appeared in an episode of "The Young and the Restless" in 2013 as "Handsy." In 2014, Leigh played "Abraham Lincoln" in an episode of Nickelodeon's iCarly. He played a major role as the antagonist in the Lifetime movie "The Spirit of Christmas" in 2015. He plays "Jack Lemmon" in the film "Near Myth: The Oskar Knight Story," which has been completed and is set for theatrical release in 2016. Reference: NY Times and Rotten Tomatoes.
I wouldn't classify his role in the "Social Network" as "very minor." He carries most of the lines for several minutes during the scene with Andrew Garfield. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colson7012 ( talk • contribs) 09:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
There is no reliable source. This page was created by a user with same surname as the page. It was requested for speedy deletion as the page history shows, but another user removed the tag. Captain Spark ( talk) 01:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Consensus is that the sources clearly support notability of the subject. — Chris Woodrich ( talk) 16:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
Liberal socialism makes no intellectual sense, at all. It's complete bullshit. Anyone with half a brain and a drive to study socialist literature understands this: that socialism is incompatible with liberalism. This article shouldn't exist, it's ridiculous. I propose that this article is to be deleted after we combine useful content with the welfare capitalism and social democracy articles. The liberal socialism article is in direction contradiction to the socialism, capitalism, mixed economy, social democracy, welfare capitalism, and democratic socialism articles. None of these articles support the idea of socialism being compatible with liberalism, or the idea of mixing socialism and capitalism. All of these articles at the moment do accept that socialism can arise from capitalism either through revolution or through gradual change. None of these articles claim that you can have both at the same time. The social democracy and welfare capitalism articles literally describe everything that is in this article, yet this article stands in contradiction. Unless everything else is wrong, it makes no sense to maintain this article. Thank you. SpaceMilk ( talk) 01:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
I have been unable to find references to show that this artist meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. The award he won is for local volunteer work. Unless an editor more familiar with sports art can find independent published material about this subject, the article should deleted. — Anne Delong ( talk) 00:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)