The result was keep. All high/secondary schools are kept per SO
(non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
This is not a university but a secondary Madrassah. The organization is not approved/listed by the University Grants Commission, Newdelhi. Prof TPMS ( talk) 23:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No arguments have been given in the last AfD. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Hoax – there is nothing on reputable news media about a person by this name dying a month ago. Just a Reddit/4chan joke in rather poor taste. Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 22:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a memorial and no reliable source (it could be a joke). Sismarinho ( talk) 21:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Poorly sourced neologism / porn quasi-genre fails WP:GNG. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
A non-notable video game composer. A while ago, I created his page just because he had one on the Japanese Wikipedia, but now I've realized he isn't really notable and that the Japanese Wikipedia has different notability guidelines. I can't find any sources indicating notability either, and the page is also near-unsourced. DrDevilFX ( talk) 20:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2016. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Subject dosen't appear to meet general notability guidelines as laid out in WP:42. Per WP:NPOL, just being an unelected candidate for office does not automatically confer notability. The sources in the article are all either primary or non- rs. I searched for better sources, and was unable to find evidence of significant coverage of the subject in secondary reliable sources. Ddcm8991 ( talk) 19:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: A redirect to Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2016 might be considered as an option, as opposed to outright deletion.-- Ddcm8991 ( talk) 20:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphan, no info available, no references or external sources to support it. Mondiad ( talk) 20:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. Only 'delete' !vote has been reversed. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 16:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Not notable at all: amateur chess player (~ 2000 USCF) who doesn't even have an international FIDE rating, let alone being a GM or a national champion (usual notability criteria for chess players)! Sophia91 ( talk) 18:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable Sanskrit word. Not a distinct Hindu deity; epithet of Kartikeya. Redtigerxyz Talk 17:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Kalasha Awards. Due to low participation, the article may be restored (and thereafter speedily renominated) without prejudice. (non-admin closure) Mz7 ( talk) 20:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable subject as per Wikipedia standards. I couldn't find any reliable third party coverage. If not a deletion the article should me merged with Kalasha_Awards. Kagundu Wanna Chat? 13:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America 1000 12:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet WP:BAND guidelines. Article mentions winning an award, however, the link provided does not list him as one of the winners. No proof/resources provided to show just how much of a contributor he is to the writing of these songs. only ( talk) 03:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable list. Should be merged with Kenya_Television_Network if not deleted. Kagundu Wanna Chat? 13:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Unreliable references. No indication of notability. Township seems to be the only notable game there, and that already has an article. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 02:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Poorly sourced article about a company, which has a definite advertorial slant to it and was created by one of its own founders (thus violating WP:COI). The sourcing here is entirely to primary sources and simple namechecks in business directories, with no reliable source coverage in which the company is a subject. As always, Wikipedia is not a free advertising directory — a company does not become entitled to have an article on here just because its own self-published web presence verifies that it exists, but must be the subject of media coverage to earn one. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 00:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I don't see the coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. She has no top tier MMA fights so she fails WP:NMMA and there's no evidence she's a notable acress that meets WP:NACTOR. Mdtemp ( talk) 21:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Article about a book, which makes no substantive claim of notability besides "book that exists" and is based entirely on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES: the source for the existence of the book is the author's profile on the website of his PR agent, and the sourcing for "two of the stories in it were previously published in multi-author anthologies" is the publication details of one of those anthologies and the Amazon.com sales page of the other. This is not how a book gets a Wikipedia article — it would qualify for one if it could be sourced to reliable source media coverage about the book, but every book that exists is not automatically eligible for a Wikipedia article just because its existence can be verified in primary sources. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 22:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO; little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Magnolia677 ( talk) 21:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
NOTE: While Dr. Williams did not win an Order of Canada, Magnolia677 deleted a variety of Order of Canada redlinks from lists of people for Peel. I posted on his or her talk page that the Order of Canada was the country's second highest civilian honour, implying to him to back off. Regardless of whether this article qualifies as notable, this users should win an "out of spite AfD nomination" barnstar. -- Zanimum ( talk) 14:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I think the discussion slightly tilts towards "delete," but the current !votes are insufficient to make that determination and we've already gone through two relists in an unsuccessful attempt to invite more comments. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable band that fails WP:BAND. I don't see any reviews in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Software library released last year and with a stable release last month. No third-party references, article reads like a library documentation rather than an encyclopedic article. Proposed deletion removed by the article's creator. - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 06:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 12:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
There is no in-depth coverage of this tour (not individual concerts, but tour) that make this notable per WP:NTOUR. It happened, and we know it, and we could possibly have a sentence or two in the main article, but this was not a notable tour. Drmies ( talk) 18:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the remainder of a set of four articles created by User:Nyflod on paintings attributed to major artists but not attested to in the usual sort of sources for such things. One of these was deleted (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actaeon mauled by his hounds) but for whatever reason the other three were never addressed. All four of these were also created on the Italian Wikipedia, and all four have been deleted there. In any case the problem is the same for these as in the first case: it is unconscionable that works by major artists should be hard to document in English. Mangoe ( talk) 03:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete Doubtful if it even exists. If it does, attribution is questionable at best. For an artist whose work is subject of so much scholarly work, and considering the other contributions of Nyflod it seems exceedingly unlikely that this is anything other than a WP:HOAX Mduvekot ( talk) 18:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete Pernom. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 09:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable geographic location. Magnolia677 ( talk) 01:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Article is about a seemingly unknown artist who, by the author's own admission, "little is known about her private or professional life", exhibited only locally and "was not recorded as a member of the Society of Women Artists". Article is cited only to birth/death notices and original research in archival records. Talk page is filed with speculation and guesswork. The list of known works show no evidence she was prolific or well known either. I don't know the motives of the author here (a relative? a west London art lover? art dealer?) but this simply doesn't show any evidence of notability therefore failing WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Sionk ( talk) 11:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted as A7 by Od Mishehu clpo13( talk)
Notability not established per WP:BIO ~ Pesco So say• we all 18:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Randykitty, multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria CSD A7, CSD G11. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Pure advertisement, but previous afd gave no consensus. The only one saying keep in that discussion was a now-banned sockpuppet DGG ( talk ) 17:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 20:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. A quick Google search does not bring up any reliable sources. Having one game in a Humble Bundle does not mean developer is notable. Soetermans. T / C 15:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. A quick Google search does not bring up WP:VG/RS, only Metacritic. Soetermans. T / C 15:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails PORNBIO and the GNG: no qualifying awards, no independent reliable sourcing. Virtually all content is promotional and/or drawn from promotional sources. PROD tendentiously removed without explanation or article improvement by the usual suspect. Prior AFD dealt with a different person of the same name. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. ( talk) 15:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Mikael_Ljungman especially User:Bishonens comment [ 1] Govindaharihari ( talk) 20:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. A collection of terrorism arrests and alleged offences. No actual attack or incident. WP:NOTNEWS. AusLondonder ( talk) 01:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. A quick Google search does not bring up enough reliable sources. Soetermans. T / C 12:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
This is a diploma mill. The university is not listed in the website of University Grants Commission, India. The link to the same given by the page creator doesn't respond. Prof TPMS ( talk) 10:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I came across this as a speedy deletion, however there's just enough in the article to assert some notability since she was part of a reality TV show. The problem though, is that I really can't see where there's enough overall to truly justify her having an article on Wikipedia. She exists and is active, but she doesn't appear to have received coverage in places that Wikipedia would consider to be reliable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. article's been improved since nomination, (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
I can find multiple mentions of it on general sites which list all possible tourist attractions in an area, but nothing which indicates notability. It is often listed simply as 'Municipal Gallery of Ioannina'. There's no Greek-lang WP article on it, but there may be Greek sources I've missed. This has been tagged for notability for 8 years, hopefully we can get it resolved one way or the other. Boleyn ( talk) 09:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Charles01, a request was put in to Wikiproject Greece about this and several similar articles on Greek museums and galleries, as it was on Wikiproject Museums. It didn't get any response and it's been months now. As it stands, we can't verify any notability, no one has found supporting sources and no notability is even asserted in article. I Googled the addresses, the Municipal Gallery is not the same as the Municipal Ethnographic Museum. Boleyn ( talk) 13:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Boleyn: You might want to look at the article again.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pinging me and well done to the editor who worked so hard on this. I can't read the Greek, but for the rest, it looks more convincing but still to pretty much just be listed on websites showing places people can go, not necessarily reliable sources or in-depth coverage. Boleyn ( talk) 19:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Boleyn: If you still seriously think it's not notable you're wasting everybody's time. Again I repeat, AFD is not an expand upon demand service. It's not the way to get all of those Greek museums expanded.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld, I seem to be in the minority on this one, but that's OK. I trust the AfD process to come out with a consensus on each one. Several of the museum/gallery articles have been deleted, one at AfD at the moment seems non-notable and that's the way its AfD is heading. You know well I have no objection to stubs, including ones as short as these, as I have created thousands of stubs myself. I have little interest in whether it is expanded (it's always nice, but not something I'm concerned about). My concern is its notability, which has been in question for an extremely long time. FOr the third time, I repeat that I am not convinced on this one, but it's OK with me that others disagree. Boleyn ( talk) 12:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Boleyn: Have you looked in on the article in the last 12 hours?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This is an indiscriminate list of information; in fact, it could be WP:IINFO at its finest.. While a list like List of most viewed YouTube videos is probably notable, I don't think the topic of Taylor Swift YouTube videos, let alone which them is the most viewed, is a notable topic. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 09:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I came across this as an A7 speedy, which it doesn't qualify for since it's a book series. This doesn't appear to be notable, as a search brings up nothing to establish that it's notable enough for an article nor that the author (whose article I recently speedied) would be notable enough for an article either. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer and photographer, whose claims of notability for both endeavours are tied entirely to unsourced assertions of popularity on social media rather than anything that would pass WP:NMUSIC or WP:CREATIVE. And there's virtually no reliable source coverage here, with the referencing based almost entirely on unreliable sources like Myspace, Shazam, last.fm, SoundCloud, ReverbNation and YouTube. The only thing here that lifts him even slightly into the realm of RS coverage is a Q&A-style interview on The Huffington Post -- but interviews represent the subject talking about himself, not independent third party coverage, and hence may not be used to bring the WP:GNG in and of themselves, but only for supplementary confirmation of facts after GNG has already been met. All of which means that nothing here is substantive enough, or sourced well enough, to get him a Wikipedia article at this time. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non notable artist. No works in major museum collections (or, for that matter, any museum collections) . The refs are the usual sort of barely described PR, or are mere notices,or both together. Promotional wording throughout, as well. DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The media overages he received fulfills Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and Wikipedia:Notability (people). The media coverage clearly suggest that he meets the Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. If you think there is praising words in article, then it should be removed, the article should not to be deleted.-- 150.129.29.104 ( talk) 05:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Now article has been improved by me by removing praising words, adding more information and citations. -- 150.129.29.104 ( talk) 13:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Coverage received to the subject, clearly meets Basic criteria of notability WP:GNG, WP:Creative
- Apart from works for Bollywood celebrities and business tycoon, Artist has done restoration for Singapore Art Museum (SAM), a national museum and one of the major tourist attractions in Singapore.
- Restoration and fresco painting projects to his credit including famous architectural heritage sites in India such as the City Palace, Jaipur and Jama Masjid.
Source : Here, Daily Bhaskar, an Indian Hindi-language daily newspaper that is now the largest circulated daily newspaper of India (Audit Bureau of Circulations)
- His collaboration with Make in India, an initiate of Government of India.
Sources : Indian government website, Please find in the article.
As significant coverage from from DNA India, Daily Mail, Times of India, India Today, Yahoo News, Daily Bhaskar, Mid Day, Indian Express, Outlook India, NDTV India, News Nation, Afternoon, Marwar India, Bollywood Hungama, Deccan Herald etc received to Sharma, is enough to prove WP:GNG.So that article can be kept.-- 103.195.248.92 ( talk) 10:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
In the same news of Daily Bhaskar, It is also clearly mentioned about his restoration and gold leafing work for City Palace, Jaipur, Havelis of Udaipur and Kishangarh, Jain Temple and Jama Masjid. - He is the only artist who has done 3D Pichwai of Shrinathji, no one has attempted before. As mentioned in DNA India's Interview. - He has introduced new form of Tanjore Painting, That is Refined 24carat Gold Tanjore Painting, in which Tanjore and miniature art has been combined. He embellishes with Real 24 carat Gold in Painting, which was used to do by artist in old days. - He is considered one of the important artist who is known for making traditional Indian Art alive. His work mainly based on Indian Art forms, which is now perishing. Known for his Tanjore works and as the only artist nurturing miniature art in India. Source : Reference can be found in News coverage and even in Indian government websites; Times of India, here, DNA, here.
Here I want to correct you that the subject is not working with notable celebrities but as an artist, He is working and painting for Bollywood celebrities and business tycoons of India. In your point of view, This may not make him notable, but In this case, For Indian society, a painter who is working for big celebrities and illustrious business families of India such as Ambani, Birla, Singhania, Piramal, L.N. Mittal, Burmans, Bajaj etc, became subject of interest and attention for Indian media and its audience, as it is covered in many news reference cited in the article, which must be considered.
I just noted your previous comment, where you mentioned about lack of non commercial or exhibitions in public space, either gallery or museum, which is false. As you agrees that his portfolio supports the claim of notability. Yes it is. Wikipedia works as per norms. We do not need to make our own rules. Significant coverage and portfolio supports his notability.
Here I'm trying to answer of your question;
- Artist has done, exhibition at Academy of Fine Arts, Kolkata in 2005. Source can be fund in the Daily Bhaskar, here.
- He held exhibition in Nehru Centre, London in May 2001 , Terrace Gallery, Sussex, England in 1996. Source : Official website of Suvigya Sharma. (Note: This were quite old exhibitions, maybe this is the reason i could not find any reliable source about this. I was not going to mention about this, but when you question about his gallery, public or non commercial exhibition. I find appropriate to mention about this.)
- Exhibition in Artisans Gallery at Kala Ghoda in 2013. Source : Artisans Gallery, here.
- Recently, after AFD, In February, Government of India celebrated Make In India Week, in Mumbai, which was inaugurated by India's Prime Minister Honorable Narendra Modi. For the event Make In India Week (February 13 to 18), Suvigya Sharma was officially chosen by the Govt and showcased his art work. Sources : Government of India's Websites, here (pdf); Mahaudyog, Government of Maharashtra's website, here; and official website of Make In India, here.-- 150.129.29.226 ( talk) 16:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
non notable author. The book claimed as her most important achievement is, according to worldcat, in no libraries at all. Not surprising, for it was self-published. The publishing firm listed has published nothing besides her works. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Pavitra in Paris is available in the following prominent libraries in Canada:
1. Vancouver Public Library https://vpl.bibliocommons.com/item/show/3637451038_pavitra_in_paris
2. Greater Victoria Public Library : https://gvpl.ent.sirsidynix.net/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:287998/one?qu=pavitra+in+paris
3. Richmond Public Library (Canada): https://yourlibrary.bibliocommons.com/item/show/1011426101_pavitra_in_paris
4. Markham Public Library: https://markham.bibliocommons.com/item/show/581988034_pavitra_in_paris
5. Fraser Valley Regional Library: https://fvrl.bibliocommons.com/item/show/1656671021_pavitra_in_paris
Please note: Vancouver Public Library is one of the 3 best and largest libraries in Canada.
News and Interview on Vinita Kinra:
1. CBC Radio Interview: http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2439827995
2. ICI Radio Canada (French interview) ( Canadian Broadcasting Corporation): http://ici.radio-canada.ca/emissions/L_heure_de_pointe_Toronto/2013-2014/archives.asp?date=2015%2F02%2F06&indTime=1648&idmedia=7240348&fb_ref=Default
3. The South Asian Times (NY Page 24) http://www.scribd.com/doc/217609558/Vol-6-Issue-50-April-12-18-2014
4. The Mississauga News: http://www.mississauga.com/community-story/4391260-author-inspires-newcomer-women-through-talk/
5. Canadian Race Relations Foundation (CRRF) (Government): http://www.crrf-fcrr.ca/en/our-canada/150-stories/search-150-stories/item/25815-canada-42-150-vinita-kinra
6. Montreal Serai (Book review) http://montrealserai.com/2014/03/22/pavitra-in-paris-stories-for-life-by-vinita-kinra/
7. CSI Viamonde (French) : http://csviamonde.ca/Viamonde/nouvelles/2014-2015/Pages/%C3%80-Viamonde,-on-souligne-le-Mois-de-l%E2%80%99histoire-des-Noirs.aspx
8. Writer Story: http://www.writerstory.com/vinita-kinra-interview-pavitra-in-paris-book/
9. Uber Quotes: http://www.uberquotes.net/quotes/authors/vinita-kinra/page/2
10. Beach Bound Books: http://www.beachboundbooks.com/author-interviews/author-interview-vinita-kinra
-- 150.107.40.40 ( talk) 13:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This is an entirely unsourced article that fails WP:NACTOR. The article's only credits are minor roles in ten films, with no in-depth coverage to be found. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 01:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This page and the game itself have been poorly maintained over the years, and the game has fallen so far into obscurity that this page is of no necessity anymore. A lot of the "updates" have contained unimportant or arbitrary information, and reference points made are of no consequence to anyone who doesn't know of this game. Tytrox ( talk) 10:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Scooby-Doo characters. This could've been Merged without a discussion here ....Anyway no point dragging this out for a week so closing as such. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 02:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Little more than a monster of the week. Since the show is based on these, not worthy even for the character list. — Vano 00:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Promotionally written and dependent mostly on primary sources. Subject lacks significant coverage in multiple, reliable secondary sources as required by WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Seventy hits on Google (and that includes results for other organisations that share the name). Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 00:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. All high/secondary schools are kept per SO
(non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
This is not a university but a secondary Madrassah. The organization is not approved/listed by the University Grants Commission, Newdelhi. Prof TPMS ( talk) 23:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. No arguments have been given in the last AfD. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 23:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Hoax – there is nothing on reputable news media about a person by this name dying a month ago. Just a Reddit/4chan joke in rather poor taste. Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 22:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a memorial and no reliable source (it could be a joke). Sismarinho ( talk) 21:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Poorly sourced neologism / porn quasi-genre fails WP:GNG. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:33, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. MelanieN ( talk) 00:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
A non-notable video game composer. A while ago, I created his page just because he had one on the Japanese Wikipedia, but now I've realized he isn't really notable and that the Japanese Wikipedia has different notability guidelines. I can't find any sources indicating notability either, and the page is also near-unsourced. DrDevilFX ( talk) 20:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was Redirect to Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2016. -- MelanieN ( talk) 00:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Subject dosen't appear to meet general notability guidelines as laid out in WP:42. Per WP:NPOL, just being an unelected candidate for office does not automatically confer notability. The sources in the article are all either primary or non- rs. I searched for better sources, and was unable to find evidence of significant coverage of the subject in secondary reliable sources. Ddcm8991 ( talk) 19:56, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: A redirect to Libertarian Party presidential primaries, 2016 might be considered as an option, as opposed to outright deletion.-- Ddcm8991 ( talk) 20:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphan, no info available, no references or external sources to support it. Mondiad ( talk) 20:38, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. Only 'delete' !vote has been reversed. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 16:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Not notable at all: amateur chess player (~ 2000 USCF) who doesn't even have an international FIDE rating, let alone being a GM or a national champion (usual notability criteria for chess players)! Sophia91 ( talk) 18:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable Sanskrit word. Not a distinct Hindu deity; epithet of Kartikeya. Redtigerxyz Talk 17:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to Kalasha Awards. Due to low participation, the article may be restored (and thereafter speedily renominated) without prejudice. (non-admin closure) Mz7 ( talk) 20:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable subject as per Wikipedia standards. I couldn't find any reliable third party coverage. If not a deletion the article should me merged with Kalasha_Awards. Kagundu Wanna Chat? 13:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America 1000 12:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Does not seem to meet WP:BAND guidelines. Article mentions winning an award, however, the link provided does not list him as one of the winners. No proof/resources provided to show just how much of a contributor he is to the writing of these songs. only ( talk) 03:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable list. Should be merged with Kenya_Television_Network if not deleted. Kagundu Wanna Chat? 13:27, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Unreliable references. No indication of notability. Township seems to be the only notable game there, and that already has an article. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 02:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Poorly sourced article about a company, which has a definite advertorial slant to it and was created by one of its own founders (thus violating WP:COI). The sourcing here is entirely to primary sources and simple namechecks in business directories, with no reliable source coverage in which the company is a subject. As always, Wikipedia is not a free advertising directory — a company does not become entitled to have an article on here just because its own self-published web presence verifies that it exists, but must be the subject of media coverage to earn one. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 00:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I don't see the coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. She has no top tier MMA fights so she fails WP:NMMA and there's no evidence she's a notable acress that meets WP:NACTOR. Mdtemp ( talk) 21:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Article about a book, which makes no substantive claim of notability besides "book that exists" and is based entirely on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES: the source for the existence of the book is the author's profile on the website of his PR agent, and the sourcing for "two of the stories in it were previously published in multi-author anthologies" is the publication details of one of those anthologies and the Amazon.com sales page of the other. This is not how a book gets a Wikipedia article — it would qualify for one if it could be sourced to reliable source media coverage about the book, but every book that exists is not automatically eligible for a Wikipedia article just because its existence can be verified in primary sources. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 22:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:15, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:BIO; little depth of coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:ANYBIO; appears to have made no widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Magnolia677 ( talk) 21:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
NOTE: While Dr. Williams did not win an Order of Canada, Magnolia677 deleted a variety of Order of Canada redlinks from lists of people for Peel. I posted on his or her talk page that the Order of Canada was the country's second highest civilian honour, implying to him to back off. Regardless of whether this article qualifies as notable, this users should win an "out of spite AfD nomination" barnstar. -- Zanimum ( talk) 14:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. I think the discussion slightly tilts towards "delete," but the current !votes are insufficient to make that determination and we've already gone through two relists in an unsuccessful attempt to invite more comments. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:14, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable band that fails WP:BAND. I don't see any reviews in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 15:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Software library released last year and with a stable release last month. No third-party references, article reads like a library documentation rather than an encyclopedic article. Proposed deletion removed by the article's creator. - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 06:35, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). North America 1000 12:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
There is no in-depth coverage of this tour (not individual concerts, but tour) that make this notable per WP:NTOUR. It happened, and we know it, and we could possibly have a sentence or two in the main article, but this was not a notable tour. Drmies ( talk) 18:34, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This is the remainder of a set of four articles created by User:Nyflod on paintings attributed to major artists but not attested to in the usual sort of sources for such things. One of these was deleted (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actaeon mauled by his hounds) but for whatever reason the other three were never addressed. All four of these were also created on the Italian Wikipedia, and all four have been deleted there. In any case the problem is the same for these as in the first case: it is unconscionable that works by major artists should be hard to document in English. Mangoe ( talk) 03:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete Doubtful if it even exists. If it does, attribution is questionable at best. For an artist whose work is subject of so much scholarly work, and considering the other contributions of Nyflod it seems exceedingly unlikely that this is anything other than a WP:HOAX Mduvekot ( talk) 18:22, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Delete Pernom. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 09:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable geographic location. Magnolia677 ( talk) 01:03, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Article is about a seemingly unknown artist who, by the author's own admission, "little is known about her private or professional life", exhibited only locally and "was not recorded as a member of the Society of Women Artists". Article is cited only to birth/death notices and original research in archival records. Talk page is filed with speculation and guesswork. The list of known works show no evidence she was prolific or well known either. I don't know the motives of the author here (a relative? a west London art lover? art dealer?) but this simply doesn't show any evidence of notability therefore failing WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. Sionk ( talk) 11:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy deleted as A7 by Od Mishehu clpo13( talk)
Notability not established per WP:BIO ~ Pesco So say• we all 18:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Randykitty, multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria CSD A7, CSD G11. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 19:15, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Pure advertisement, but previous afd gave no consensus. The only one saying keep in that discussion was a now-banned sockpuppet DGG ( talk ) 17:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. czar 20:05, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. A quick Google search does not bring up any reliable sources. Having one game in a Humble Bundle does not mean developer is notable. Soetermans. T / C 15:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:08, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. A quick Google search does not bring up WP:VG/RS, only Metacritic. Soetermans. T / C 15:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails PORNBIO and the GNG: no qualifying awards, no independent reliable sourcing. Virtually all content is promotional and/or drawn from promotional sources. PROD tendentiously removed without explanation or article improvement by the usual suspect. Prior AFD dealt with a different person of the same name. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. ( talk) 15:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Mikael_Ljungman especially User:Bishonens comment [ 1] Govindaharihari ( talk) 20:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability. A collection of terrorism arrests and alleged offences. No actual attack or incident. WP:NOTNEWS. AusLondonder ( talk) 01:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:00, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG. A quick Google search does not bring up enough reliable sources. Soetermans. T / C 12:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 01:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
This is a diploma mill. The university is not listed in the website of University Grants Commission, India. The link to the same given by the page creator doesn't respond. Prof TPMS ( talk) 10:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:59, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I came across this as a speedy deletion, however there's just enough in the article to assert some notability since she was part of a reality TV show. The problem though, is that I really can't see where there's enough overall to truly justify her having an article on Wikipedia. She exists and is active, but she doesn't appear to have received coverage in places that Wikipedia would consider to be reliable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:47, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was keep. article's been improved since nomination, (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 01:54, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
I can find multiple mentions of it on general sites which list all possible tourist attractions in an area, but nothing which indicates notability. It is often listed simply as 'Municipal Gallery of Ioannina'. There's no Greek-lang WP article on it, but there may be Greek sources I've missed. This has been tagged for notability for 8 years, hopefully we can get it resolved one way or the other. Boleyn ( talk) 09:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Charles01, a request was put in to Wikiproject Greece about this and several similar articles on Greek museums and galleries, as it was on Wikiproject Museums. It didn't get any response and it's been months now. As it stands, we can't verify any notability, no one has found supporting sources and no notability is even asserted in article. I Googled the addresses, the Municipal Gallery is not the same as the Municipal Ethnographic Museum. Boleyn ( talk) 13:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Boleyn: You might want to look at the article again.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:59, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pinging me and well done to the editor who worked so hard on this. I can't read the Greek, but for the rest, it looks more convincing but still to pretty much just be listed on websites showing places people can go, not necessarily reliable sources or in-depth coverage. Boleyn ( talk) 19:16, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Boleyn: If you still seriously think it's not notable you're wasting everybody's time. Again I repeat, AFD is not an expand upon demand service. It's not the way to get all of those Greek museums expanded.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Dr. Blofeld, I seem to be in the minority on this one, but that's OK. I trust the AfD process to come out with a consensus on each one. Several of the museum/gallery articles have been deleted, one at AfD at the moment seems non-notable and that's the way its AfD is heading. You know well I have no objection to stubs, including ones as short as these, as I have created thousands of stubs myself. I have little interest in whether it is expanded (it's always nice, but not something I'm concerned about). My concern is its notability, which has been in question for an extremely long time. FOr the third time, I repeat that I am not convinced on this one, but it's OK with me that others disagree. Boleyn ( talk) 12:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Boleyn: Have you looked in on the article in the last 12 hours?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:41, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This is an indiscriminate list of information; in fact, it could be WP:IINFO at its finest.. While a list like List of most viewed YouTube videos is probably notable, I don't think the topic of Taylor Swift YouTube videos, let alone which them is the most viewed, is a notable topic. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 09:06, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
I came across this as an A7 speedy, which it doesn't qualify for since it's a book series. This doesn't appear to be notable, as a search brings up nothing to establish that it's notable enough for an article nor that the author (whose article I recently speedied) would be notable enough for an article either. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 12:13, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a writer and photographer, whose claims of notability for both endeavours are tied entirely to unsourced assertions of popularity on social media rather than anything that would pass WP:NMUSIC or WP:CREATIVE. And there's virtually no reliable source coverage here, with the referencing based almost entirely on unreliable sources like Myspace, Shazam, last.fm, SoundCloud, ReverbNation and YouTube. The only thing here that lifts him even slightly into the realm of RS coverage is a Q&A-style interview on The Huffington Post -- but interviews represent the subject talking about himself, not independent third party coverage, and hence may not be used to bring the WP:GNG in and of themselves, but only for supplementary confirmation of facts after GNG has already been met. All of which means that nothing here is substantive enough, or sourced well enough, to get him a Wikipedia article at this time. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 04:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:33, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Non notable artist. No works in major museum collections (or, for that matter, any museum collections) . The refs are the usual sort of barely described PR, or are mere notices,or both together. Promotional wording throughout, as well. DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The media overages he received fulfills Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and Wikipedia:Notability (people). The media coverage clearly suggest that he meets the Wikipedia's Notability guidelines. If you think there is praising words in article, then it should be removed, the article should not to be deleted.-- 150.129.29.104 ( talk) 05:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Now article has been improved by me by removing praising words, adding more information and citations. -- 150.129.29.104 ( talk) 13:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Coverage received to the subject, clearly meets Basic criteria of notability WP:GNG, WP:Creative
- Apart from works for Bollywood celebrities and business tycoon, Artist has done restoration for Singapore Art Museum (SAM), a national museum and one of the major tourist attractions in Singapore.
- Restoration and fresco painting projects to his credit including famous architectural heritage sites in India such as the City Palace, Jaipur and Jama Masjid.
Source : Here, Daily Bhaskar, an Indian Hindi-language daily newspaper that is now the largest circulated daily newspaper of India (Audit Bureau of Circulations)
- His collaboration with Make in India, an initiate of Government of India.
Sources : Indian government website, Please find in the article.
As significant coverage from from DNA India, Daily Mail, Times of India, India Today, Yahoo News, Daily Bhaskar, Mid Day, Indian Express, Outlook India, NDTV India, News Nation, Afternoon, Marwar India, Bollywood Hungama, Deccan Herald etc received to Sharma, is enough to prove WP:GNG.So that article can be kept.-- 103.195.248.92 ( talk) 10:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
In the same news of Daily Bhaskar, It is also clearly mentioned about his restoration and gold leafing work for City Palace, Jaipur, Havelis of Udaipur and Kishangarh, Jain Temple and Jama Masjid. - He is the only artist who has done 3D Pichwai of Shrinathji, no one has attempted before. As mentioned in DNA India's Interview. - He has introduced new form of Tanjore Painting, That is Refined 24carat Gold Tanjore Painting, in which Tanjore and miniature art has been combined. He embellishes with Real 24 carat Gold in Painting, which was used to do by artist in old days. - He is considered one of the important artist who is known for making traditional Indian Art alive. His work mainly based on Indian Art forms, which is now perishing. Known for his Tanjore works and as the only artist nurturing miniature art in India. Source : Reference can be found in News coverage and even in Indian government websites; Times of India, here, DNA, here.
Here I want to correct you that the subject is not working with notable celebrities but as an artist, He is working and painting for Bollywood celebrities and business tycoons of India. In your point of view, This may not make him notable, but In this case, For Indian society, a painter who is working for big celebrities and illustrious business families of India such as Ambani, Birla, Singhania, Piramal, L.N. Mittal, Burmans, Bajaj etc, became subject of interest and attention for Indian media and its audience, as it is covered in many news reference cited in the article, which must be considered.
I just noted your previous comment, where you mentioned about lack of non commercial or exhibitions in public space, either gallery or museum, which is false. As you agrees that his portfolio supports the claim of notability. Yes it is. Wikipedia works as per norms. We do not need to make our own rules. Significant coverage and portfolio supports his notability.
Here I'm trying to answer of your question;
- Artist has done, exhibition at Academy of Fine Arts, Kolkata in 2005. Source can be fund in the Daily Bhaskar, here.
- He held exhibition in Nehru Centre, London in May 2001 , Terrace Gallery, Sussex, England in 1996. Source : Official website of Suvigya Sharma. (Note: This were quite old exhibitions, maybe this is the reason i could not find any reliable source about this. I was not going to mention about this, but when you question about his gallery, public or non commercial exhibition. I find appropriate to mention about this.)
- Exhibition in Artisans Gallery at Kala Ghoda in 2013. Source : Artisans Gallery, here.
- Recently, after AFD, In February, Government of India celebrated Make In India Week, in Mumbai, which was inaugurated by India's Prime Minister Honorable Narendra Modi. For the event Make In India Week (February 13 to 18), Suvigya Sharma was officially chosen by the Govt and showcased his art work. Sources : Government of India's Websites, here (pdf); Mahaudyog, Government of Maharashtra's website, here; and official website of Make In India, here.-- 150.129.29.226 ( talk) 16:42, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:32, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
non notable author. The book claimed as her most important achievement is, according to worldcat, in no libraries at all. Not surprising, for it was self-published. The publishing firm listed has published nothing besides her works. DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Pavitra in Paris is available in the following prominent libraries in Canada:
1. Vancouver Public Library https://vpl.bibliocommons.com/item/show/3637451038_pavitra_in_paris
2. Greater Victoria Public Library : https://gvpl.ent.sirsidynix.net/client/en_US/default/search/detailnonmodal/ent:$002f$002fSD_ILS$002f0$002fSD_ILS:287998/one?qu=pavitra+in+paris
3. Richmond Public Library (Canada): https://yourlibrary.bibliocommons.com/item/show/1011426101_pavitra_in_paris
4. Markham Public Library: https://markham.bibliocommons.com/item/show/581988034_pavitra_in_paris
5. Fraser Valley Regional Library: https://fvrl.bibliocommons.com/item/show/1656671021_pavitra_in_paris
Please note: Vancouver Public Library is one of the 3 best and largest libraries in Canada.
News and Interview on Vinita Kinra:
1. CBC Radio Interview: http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2439827995
2. ICI Radio Canada (French interview) ( Canadian Broadcasting Corporation): http://ici.radio-canada.ca/emissions/L_heure_de_pointe_Toronto/2013-2014/archives.asp?date=2015%2F02%2F06&indTime=1648&idmedia=7240348&fb_ref=Default
3. The South Asian Times (NY Page 24) http://www.scribd.com/doc/217609558/Vol-6-Issue-50-April-12-18-2014
4. The Mississauga News: http://www.mississauga.com/community-story/4391260-author-inspires-newcomer-women-through-talk/
5. Canadian Race Relations Foundation (CRRF) (Government): http://www.crrf-fcrr.ca/en/our-canada/150-stories/search-150-stories/item/25815-canada-42-150-vinita-kinra
6. Montreal Serai (Book review) http://montrealserai.com/2014/03/22/pavitra-in-paris-stories-for-life-by-vinita-kinra/
7. CSI Viamonde (French) : http://csviamonde.ca/Viamonde/nouvelles/2014-2015/Pages/%C3%80-Viamonde,-on-souligne-le-Mois-de-l%E2%80%99histoire-des-Noirs.aspx
8. Writer Story: http://www.writerstory.com/vinita-kinra-interview-pavitra-in-paris-book/
9. Uber Quotes: http://www.uberquotes.net/quotes/authors/vinita-kinra/page/2
10. Beach Bound Books: http://www.beachboundbooks.com/author-interviews/author-interview-vinita-kinra
-- 150.107.40.40 ( talk) 13:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This is an entirely unsourced article that fails WP:NACTOR. The article's only credits are minor roles in ten films, with no in-depth coverage to be found. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 01:23, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This page and the game itself have been poorly maintained over the years, and the game has fallen so far into obscurity that this page is of no necessity anymore. A lot of the "updates" have contained unimportant or arbitrary information, and reference points made are of no consequence to anyone who doesn't know of this game. Tytrox ( talk) 10:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
The result was merge to List of Scooby-Doo characters. This could've been Merged without a discussion here ....Anyway no point dragging this out for a week so closing as such. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Talk 02:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Little more than a monster of the week. Since the show is based on these, not worthy even for the character list. — Vano 00:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Promotionally written and dependent mostly on primary sources. Subject lacks significant coverage in multiple, reliable secondary sources as required by WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Seventy hits on Google (and that includes results for other organisations that share the name). Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 00:25, 13 February 2016 (UTC)