![]() |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Marslo2015 ( talk) 12:58, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm not entirely convinced that this was a real noble family; a Google search gets me mostly false positives about Baltimore baseball fans. Is there an Italian name I should be searching? Half the sources are not actually anything I could verify. The user who created this has been blocked for being unwilling/unable to communicate. PROD removed by an IP with no reason given. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Local band. Searches (when narrowed by including "band" and "Dallas") fail to find anything but calendar listings and PR. Article has existed for 10 years, but has never had a single independent reference. | Uncle Milty | talk | 23:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 21:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete under CSD G4 -- see previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksej Pechkurov. This article has been repeatedly recreated under different names -- see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alex9777777 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alex9777777/Archive for more. └ UkPaolo/ talk┐ 22:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Not a notable person. No Google results. Speedy deletion removed by IP that has no edits outside this article, and could very well be the creator. JDDJS ( talk) 21:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Magnolia677 ( talk) 20:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Passes WP:NFOOTBALL (non-admin closure) Dat Guy Talk Contribs 12:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable sportsperson. Quis separabit? 20:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. The nominator has withdrawn his nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
No sources, fails WP:ARTIST NottNott talk| contrib 19:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Apparently non-notable actress, reference list consists of a single link to IMDB (fails independence). Article requires multiple independent reliable sources that cover the subject in depth in order to be retained. KDS4444 Talk 19:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. I am withdrawing my nomination. J04n( talk page) 13:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Do not believe that his accomplishments meet the criteria for NTRACK and unable to find any coverage that would meet GNG or WP:ANYBIO. J04n( talk page) 19:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Album which does not pass WP:NALBUMS, no easy google hits, not listed at Czech IFPI (record charts). Artist also listed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Vondráček ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I've found a bunch of mentions regarding the design or future design of buildings by this company, but nothing in depth about them that would indicate that they are notable. Sam Walton ( talk) 18:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
No obvious WP:BIO criteria for notability. In terms of general coverage, there is one Daily Mail article about her losing a bunch of weight as a grandmother and winning a beauty contest in New Jersey for married women. All other references are passing mentions. Like all of the articles created by this one's author, smells strongly of undisclosed paid-editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Can't find any reliable sources about this website, therefore not notable. Sam Walton ( talk) 17:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I've found mentions, press releases, and light coverage of the acquisition, but nothing that would show this company is notable. Sam Walton ( talk) 16:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This is clearly still a WP:LINKFARM. I could see that the article could possibly be re-written in prose to make notable encyclopedic content but since the last AfD (5 years ago) nothing has happened. As such, I believe this list and List of Tea Party protests, 2009 should be deleted. WormTT( talk) 16:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR ,upcoming actor a case of WP:TOOSOON Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 15:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete: WP:TOOSOON--— OluwaCurtis »» ( talk to me) 16:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Self promotional. Many sources listed do not have in-depth introduction of the subject. The behavior of User:Haotianqi2 on Chinese Wikipedia suggests a strong conflict of interest. Mys_721tx ( talk) 15:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Only source in the article is Google Maps. Embassies normally aren't notable unless they receive coverage in reliable sources, which doesn't appear to be the case for this one. It doesn't help that Austria–Nicaragua relations is a red link. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 15:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete: per reasons given by Narutolovehinata5 --— OluwaCurtis »» ( talk to me) 15:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:48, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. No awards. No newspaper articles of any substance that I can find. All references seem to be reviews or from the authors website. Derek Andrews ( talk) 14:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Noting that the article was completely unreferenced even at the end of the AfD, making deletion mandatory per WP:V. Sandstein 09:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep: The posts in support of this nomination are almost unbelievable. You only have to look at the map in the article to see that THIS ARTICLE IS NOT ABOUT A CLOVERLEAF INTERSECTION!!!! Which is yet further proof that the proponents of deletion of this and other Autobahn interchange articles are simply disruptively editing. Bahnfrend ( talk) 14:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 14:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, WP:TOOSOON, only ref is artist's website. Article is a translation of a recently created article from the Czech wiki.
The result was redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners. Spartaz Humbug! 22:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon. This does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. Her other activities would not justify a stand alone article. Legacypac ( talk) 05:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners. Spartaz Humbug! 22:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Formula artricle, seen one, seen them all. Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon where the information is best presented in context as part of a list. The proposed redirect does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. The rest of the article is trivia like the names of her family members - although her father has an article because he was accused of war crimes! Her job as a dental hygienist does not suggest any future career that would mean she sees anything more then her 15 minutes of fame WP:15MOF. Legacypac ( talk) 05:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
The subject of the BLP does not appear to meet GNG or ANYBIO. Unable to find any references in reliable sources independent of the subject. J04n( talk page) 13:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, no extensive coverage by reliable sources. None of its candidates hold office. I've tagged this for notability several times as an IP, and presumably COI accounts remove the templates. Article is increasingly being used as a promotional page. See also Let Suan Khai and Kham En Thang. JNW ( talk) 12:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners. Spartaz Humbug! 22:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon where the information is best presented in context as part of a list. The proposed redirect does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. The rest of the article is trivia like the names of her family members and that she has attended (as an observer) a bunch of pageants. Legacypac ( talk) 05:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to be legitimate. Nothing in Google but mirrors of this page. Curro2 (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of significance Alvin the Almighty ( talk) 11:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
do not delete this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.119.125 ( talk) 16:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Possibly notable as author, but only reviews I can find are PW and Booklist, nothing in newspapers that I can access. As for his entrepreneur cred, there is this 1998 article when he was "pre-success". But I don't find anything else other than the brief quotes. I think this fellow is marginal in terms of notability. LaMona ( talk) 17:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Jgreene1333 ( talk) 00:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)I'd disagree. Shankman is very notable, just seems to have an underwritten Wikipedia entry, which I've been updating. I've added numerous keynotes, CNN appearances, and more information on the companies he's founded, and sold.
Jgreene1333 ( talk) 19:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Sure - I've added 13 media appearances on CNN and Fox, as well as 9 significant keynoting events over the last year, and can easily double or triple that as I keep going, so I'd think he'd definitely qualify as notable :) (and also have a very under built out page, previously).
SwisterTwister Sorry for unncessary edits - there are number of better general notability links that I'll put up there once I have them drafted :)
Significantly updated with many more resources and profiles. Jgreene1333 ( talk) 13:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
LaMona - I'm unclear if the issue with NASA advisory panel was that the title needed to cited exactly, which I've updated, but he is listed on the PDF that is the reference, under the committee. I've removed the picture until I can post additional documentation about it. There are a number of profiles listed about him, including Crain's New York, and others. I can take down Smack Media, and find an additional source for that story. Jgreene1333 ( talk) 20:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm confused - there's plenty of coverage in independent sources, the issue seems to be with the formatting, not with the existence of coverage of Shankman - Jgreene1333 ( talk) 16:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Autobiography. Refs (note: they do exist but are inline external links so there is no references section) are predominantly unreliable (facebook, blogs, etc) and notability is not demonstrated. However the real problem with the article is that it is entirely written from a non-neutral point of view: not only is it promotional throughout it appears this individual has a "colourful" past (see "Costa Mesa bar owner liable in $18 million Ponzi scheme") and the article is an attempt to counter that, going so far as to say "Barrera is working to ... expose the perpetrator(s) that have extorted and falsely named him and continue his work as a cultural ambassador" etc. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Notability concerns aside, there is nothing salvageable here - delete. RichardOSmith ( talk) 11:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. To delete, at least. Whether to convert to a list article, as proposed, might need further discussion. Sandstein 10:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
See talk page for RfC. Majority agree this is WP:OR. If no one wants to scale it back to a short list of links to related to the concept, it seems the closest thing we have to consensus is to just delete the thing.
As there is no consensus about what this should even include as a list, and even that would be OR, deletion seems the best option. This doesn't belong on the 'pedia. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 21:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
No sources, no date announced, and this has not been televised for many years - YouTube show only. Too soon for an article. Past event dates suggest July/August 2016 Legacypac ( talk) 08:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Obvious Keep is obvious. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This actor fails
WP:NACTOR, considering that none of the roles listed are significant. Being the voice in a re-dubbed film is almost notable, but subjectively I feel that this does not meet the threshold. Being related to other entertainers does not give someone notability. Though there are a few hits on google, they are not related to anything in the article and do not cover anything substantive or "remarkable" (most of the hits name her as Miley Cyrus' sister) only noting that she wears provocative clothing. If this person gains more significant experience in the future, the article should be recreated. Again if this person does more with their life in terms of activism or culture, she would gain notability (fundraising for PETA is again dubious notability [in itself]).
Cocoaguy
ここがいい
07:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovifm.com ( Radio ). Continued block evasion by serial sockpuppeteer User:Alex9777777. Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 13:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Had nominated for speedy under A7, anonymous IP user removed, am now moving to AfD, see talk page for the list of previous titles under which this company has attempted to insert itself into Wikipedia. KDS4444 Talk 08:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC) KDS4444 Talk 08:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The true art of the real site and a man ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.45.9.97 ( talk) 07:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I added information in article, good article — Preceding unsigned comment added by JenniferMari-Gardner ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed by TonyTheTiger, saying this should be expanded with details about his relationship with Paris Hilton, but the facts actually are that he only apparently dated Paris Hilton a few years and there's nothing else to suggest he was otherwise best known for anything else even including his relationship (to be honest, there's not even much solid in-depth coverage about the relationship as it is). As mentioned with my PROD here, my searches found exactly the expected coverage, gossip and passing mentions and the longest work he ever had was only four episodes of one TV show, it also seems he's no longer active with the entertainment area as well. It's also worth this is a particularly troubled BLP article (basically unsourced) with a few vandalisms here and there. SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as A7. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. The only thing the actor seems to have done is to have a guest appearance in two independent films, one of which doesn't have a Wikipedia article and the other one which is being considered for deletion as well. Google results too don't help and I am unable to see how the topic is notable. The actor may receive coverage in the future, but as it stands I don't see anything significant enough about the subject that would warrant the existence of this article. Ya sh ! 05:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
The article fail GNG and Notability (web). I searched for the reliable Independent sources but i also fail to find any independent sources that show the notability of the subject rather than these ( [7], [8], [9], [10]) four links which also seems self-published. G. Singh ( talk) 20:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are given less weight because they claim the existence of sources, but do not cite them; indeed, the article contains no reliable independent sources. Sandstein 09:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Claims no notability, fails
WP:GNG. PROD was revertinged by citing reason that she is covered in some book written by her colleague at NDTV! Sounds very much an independent source. (rolling eyes smiley) §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits}
11:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This article is a joke, a hoax, a prank. Jonty Haywood – who is quoted by several sources in the article, is the creator of LoseTheGame.com (which hosts several of the sources), and is the author of the petition mentioned in the article – was responsible for the Porthemmet Beach hoax. Among the sources for the article are social media postings, articles from student newspapers, and an email apparently sent to a school boy by the Australian prime minister. And it's illustrated by a picture of a toilet. The GA Review was obviously done as a joke. It didn't discuss any of the obvious problems with the article, including the sources. Jack Upland ( talk) 05:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep – The list of references Jack Upland gives may not be the strongest collection ever put together, but together they do enough to satisfy me that the topic is sufficiently notable for a low-importance article, particularly as it is known fairly widely and over a period of many years. (Notwithstanding the article does require some clean-up). Aspirex ( talk) 11:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
References
The result was merge to Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
A cable-news TV special, airing TODAY, and propped by a single newspaper preview listing and a partisan blog posting. Not even *close* to meeting notability guidelines, even technically. Calton | Talk 04:11, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable new concept. Antigng ( talk) 03:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Just know as the sister of Alishba Yousuf and Syra Yousuf. Musa Talk ☻ 03:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 03:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bugs Bunny's Looney Christmas Tales. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (films) Cubbie15fan ( talk) 03:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion as WP:G5. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (films) Cubbie15fan ( talk) 03:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Apparently briefly cracked some Israeli music chart, though none of the sources appears to be a solid WP:RS. Smells like paid editing, Prod was disputed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) clpo13( talk) 06:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Not a notable term or subgenre. Koala15 ( talk) 02:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 23:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Only sources are dead links, does not appear to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG Melcous ( talk) 00:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Marslo2015 ( talk) 12:58, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm not entirely convinced that this was a real noble family; a Google search gets me mostly false positives about Baltimore baseball fans. Is there an Italian name I should be searching? Half the sources are not actually anything I could verify. The user who created this has been blocked for being unwilling/unable to communicate. PROD removed by an IP with no reason given. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 23:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Local band. Searches (when narrowed by including "band" and "Dallas") fail to find anything but calendar listings and PR. Article has existed for 10 years, but has never had a single independent reference. | Uncle Milty | talk | 23:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:38, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty ( talk) 21:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was Speedy Delete under CSD G4 -- see previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleksej Pechkurov. This article has been repeatedly recreated under different names -- see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alex9777777 and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alex9777777/Archive for more. └ UkPaolo/ talk┐ 22:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Not a notable person. No Google results. Speedy deletion removed by IP that has no edits outside this article, and could very well be the creator. JDDJS ( talk) 21:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Magnolia677 ( talk) 20:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Passes WP:NFOOTBALL (non-admin closure) Dat Guy Talk Contribs 12:29, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete: as non-notable sportsperson. Quis separabit? 20:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. The nominator has withdrawn his nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 16:28, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
No sources, fails WP:ARTIST NottNott talk| contrib 19:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Apparently non-notable actress, reference list consists of a single link to IMDB (fails independence). Article requires multiple independent reliable sources that cover the subject in depth in order to be retained. KDS4444 Talk 19:28, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. I am withdrawing my nomination. J04n( talk page) 13:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
Do not believe that his accomplishments meet the criteria for NTRACK and unable to find any coverage that would meet GNG or WP:ANYBIO. J04n( talk page) 19:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Album which does not pass WP:NALBUMS, no easy google hits, not listed at Czech IFPI (record charts). Artist also listed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Vondráček ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I've found a bunch of mentions regarding the design or future design of buildings by this company, but nothing in depth about them that would indicate that they are notable. Sam Walton ( talk) 18:55, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
No obvious WP:BIO criteria for notability. In terms of general coverage, there is one Daily Mail article about her losing a bunch of weight as a grandmother and winning a beauty contest in New Jersey for married women. All other references are passing mentions. Like all of the articles created by this one's author, smells strongly of undisclosed paid-editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:42, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Can't find any reliable sources about this website, therefore not notable. Sam Walton ( talk) 17:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I've found mentions, press releases, and light coverage of the acquisition, but nothing that would show this company is notable. Sam Walton ( talk) 16:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This is clearly still a WP:LINKFARM. I could see that the article could possibly be re-written in prose to make notable encyclopedic content but since the last AfD (5 years ago) nothing has happened. As such, I believe this list and List of Tea Party protests, 2009 should be deleted. WormTT( talk) 16:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR ,upcoming actor a case of WP:TOOSOON Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 15:58, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete: WP:TOOSOON--— OluwaCurtis »» ( talk to me) 16:01, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Self promotional. Many sources listed do not have in-depth introduction of the subject. The behavior of User:Haotianqi2 on Chinese Wikipedia suggests a strong conflict of interest. Mys_721tx ( talk) 15:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Only source in the article is Google Maps. Embassies normally aren't notable unless they receive coverage in reliable sources, which doesn't appear to be the case for this one. It doesn't help that Austria–Nicaragua relations is a red link. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 15:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Delete: per reasons given by Narutolovehinata5 --— OluwaCurtis »» ( talk to me) 15:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:48, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of any notability. No awards. No newspaper articles of any substance that I can find. All references seem to be reviews or from the authors website. Derek Andrews ( talk) 14:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:52, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Noting that the article was completely unreferenced even at the end of the AfD, making deletion mandatory per WP:V. Sandstein 09:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:37, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep: The posts in support of this nomination are almost unbelievable. You only have to look at the map in the article to see that THIS ARTICLE IS NOT ABOUT A CLOVERLEAF INTERSECTION!!!! Which is yet further proof that the proponents of deletion of this and other Autobahn interchange articles are simply disruptively editing. Bahnfrend ( talk) 14:25, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Just another interchange like thousands of others. Onel5969 TT me 14:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Was de-prodded with a lengthy rationale. However, the rationale never successfully addresses the point that this particular interchange passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 14:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. J04n( talk page) 17:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable musician, WP:TOOSOON, only ref is artist's website. Article is a translation of a recently created article from the Czech wiki.
The result was redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners. Spartaz Humbug! 22:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon. This does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. Her other activities would not justify a stand alone article. Legacypac ( talk) 05:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners. Spartaz Humbug! 22:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Formula artricle, seen one, seen them all. Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon where the information is best presented in context as part of a list. The proposed redirect does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. The rest of the article is trivia like the names of her family members - although her father has an article because he was accused of war crimes! Her job as a dental hygienist does not suggest any future career that would mean she sees anything more then her 15 minutes of fame WP:15MOF. Legacypac ( talk) 05:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
The subject of the BLP does not appear to meet GNG or ANYBIO. Unable to find any references in reliable sources independent of the subject. J04n( talk page) 13:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, no extensive coverage by reliable sources. None of its candidates hold office. I've tagged this for notability several times as an IP, and presumably COI accounts remove the templates. Article is increasingly being used as a promotional page. See also Let Suan Khai and Kham En Thang. JNW ( talk) 12:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners. Spartaz Humbug! 22:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon where the information is best presented in context as part of a list. The proposed redirect does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. The rest of the article is trivia like the names of her family members and that she has attended (as an observer) a bunch of pageants. Legacypac ( talk) 05:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Does not appear to be legitimate. Nothing in Google but mirrors of this page. Curro2 (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
No indication of significance Alvin the Almighty ( talk) 11:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
do not delete this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.119.125 ( talk) 16:33, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Possibly notable as author, but only reviews I can find are PW and Booklist, nothing in newspapers that I can access. As for his entrepreneur cred, there is this 1998 article when he was "pre-success". But I don't find anything else other than the brief quotes. I think this fellow is marginal in terms of notability. LaMona ( talk) 17:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Jgreene1333 ( talk) 00:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)I'd disagree. Shankman is very notable, just seems to have an underwritten Wikipedia entry, which I've been updating. I've added numerous keynotes, CNN appearances, and more information on the companies he's founded, and sold.
Jgreene1333 ( talk) 19:50, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Sure - I've added 13 media appearances on CNN and Fox, as well as 9 significant keynoting events over the last year, and can easily double or triple that as I keep going, so I'd think he'd definitely qualify as notable :) (and also have a very under built out page, previously).
SwisterTwister Sorry for unncessary edits - there are number of better general notability links that I'll put up there once I have them drafted :)
Significantly updated with many more resources and profiles. Jgreene1333 ( talk) 13:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
LaMona - I'm unclear if the issue with NASA advisory panel was that the title needed to cited exactly, which I've updated, but he is listed on the PDF that is the reference, under the committee. I've removed the picture until I can post additional documentation about it. There are a number of profiles listed about him, including Crain's New York, and others. I can take down Smack Media, and find an additional source for that story. Jgreene1333 ( talk) 20:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
I'm confused - there's plenty of coverage in independent sources, the issue seems to be with the formatting, not with the existence of coverage of Shankman - Jgreene1333 ( talk) 16:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:16, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Autobiography. Refs (note: they do exist but are inline external links so there is no references section) are predominantly unreliable (facebook, blogs, etc) and notability is not demonstrated. However the real problem with the article is that it is entirely written from a non-neutral point of view: not only is it promotional throughout it appears this individual has a "colourful" past (see "Costa Mesa bar owner liable in $18 million Ponzi scheme") and the article is an attempt to counter that, going so far as to say "Barrera is working to ... expose the perpetrator(s) that have extorted and falsely named him and continue his work as a cultural ambassador" etc. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Notability concerns aside, there is nothing salvageable here - delete. RichardOSmith ( talk) 11:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. To delete, at least. Whether to convert to a list article, as proposed, might need further discussion. Sandstein 10:00, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
See talk page for RfC. Majority agree this is WP:OR. If no one wants to scale it back to a short list of links to related to the concept, it seems the closest thing we have to consensus is to just delete the thing.
As there is no consensus about what this should even include as a list, and even that would be OR, deletion seems the best option. This doesn't belong on the 'pedia. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 21:23, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
No sources, no date announced, and this has not been televised for many years - YouTube show only. Too soon for an article. Past event dates suggest July/August 2016 Legacypac ( talk) 08:30, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. Obvious Keep is obvious. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This actor fails
WP:NACTOR, considering that none of the roles listed are significant. Being the voice in a re-dubbed film is almost notable, but subjectively I feel that this does not meet the threshold. Being related to other entertainers does not give someone notability. Though there are a few hits on google, they are not related to anything in the article and do not cover anything substantive or "remarkable" (most of the hits name her as Miley Cyrus' sister) only noting that she wears provocative clothing. If this person gains more significant experience in the future, the article should be recreated. Again if this person does more with their life in terms of activism or culture, she would gain notability (fundraising for PETA is again dubious notability [in itself]).
Cocoaguy
ここがいい
07:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lovifm.com ( Radio ). Continued block evasion by serial sockpuppeteer User:Alex9777777. Super Mario Man ( Talk ) 13:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Had nominated for speedy under A7, anonymous IP user removed, am now moving to AfD, see talk page for the list of previous titles under which this company has attempted to insert itself into Wikipedia. KDS4444 Talk 08:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC) KDS4444 Talk 08:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
The true art of the real site and a man ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.45.9.97 ( talk) 07:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
I added information in article, good article — Preceding unsigned comment added by JenniferMari-Gardner ( talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
PROD removed by TonyTheTiger, saying this should be expanded with details about his relationship with Paris Hilton, but the facts actually are that he only apparently dated Paris Hilton a few years and there's nothing else to suggest he was otherwise best known for anything else even including his relationship (to be honest, there's not even much solid in-depth coverage about the relationship as it is). As mentioned with my PROD here, my searches found exactly the expected coverage, gossip and passing mentions and the longest work he ever had was only four episodes of one TV show, it also seems he's no longer active with the entertainment area as well. It's also worth this is a particularly troubled BLP article (basically unsourced) with a few vandalisms here and there. SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete as A7. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NACTOR. The only thing the actor seems to have done is to have a guest appearance in two independent films, one of which doesn't have a Wikipedia article and the other one which is being considered for deletion as well. Google results too don't help and I am unable to see how the topic is notable. The actor may receive coverage in the future, but as it stands I don't see anything significant enough about the subject that would warrant the existence of this article. Ya sh ! 05:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 18:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
The article fail GNG and Notability (web). I searched for the reliable Independent sources but i also fail to find any independent sources that show the notability of the subject rather than these ( [7], [8], [9], [10]) four links which also seems self-published. G. Singh ( talk) 20:21, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are given less weight because they claim the existence of sources, but do not cite them; indeed, the article contains no reliable independent sources. Sandstein 09:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Claims no notability, fails
WP:GNG. PROD was revertinged by citing reason that she is covered in some book written by her colleague at NDTV! Sounds very much an independent source. (rolling eyes smiley) §§
Dharmadhyaksha§§ {
Talk /
Edits}
11:11, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
This article is a joke, a hoax, a prank. Jonty Haywood – who is quoted by several sources in the article, is the creator of LoseTheGame.com (which hosts several of the sources), and is the author of the petition mentioned in the article – was responsible for the Porthemmet Beach hoax. Among the sources for the article are social media postings, articles from student newspapers, and an email apparently sent to a school boy by the Australian prime minister. And it's illustrated by a picture of a toilet. The GA Review was obviously done as a joke. It didn't discuss any of the obvious problems with the article, including the sources. Jack Upland ( talk) 05:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep – The list of references Jack Upland gives may not be the strongest collection ever put together, but together they do enough to satisfy me that the topic is sufficiently notable for a low-importance article, particularly as it is known fairly widely and over a period of many years. (Notwithstanding the article does require some clean-up). Aspirex ( talk) 11:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
References
The result was merge to Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 ( talk) 01:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
A cable-news TV special, airing TODAY, and propped by a single newspaper preview listing and a partisan blog posting. Not even *close* to meeting notability guidelines, even technically. Calton | Talk 04:11, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:24, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable new concept. Antigng ( talk) 03:45, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable person. Just know as the sister of Alishba Yousuf and Syra Yousuf. Musa Talk ☻ 03:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 03:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Bugs Bunny's Looney Christmas Tales. (non-admin closure) – Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 02:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (films) Cubbie15fan ( talk) 03:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy deletion as WP:G5. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (films) Cubbie15fan ( talk) 03:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 00:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Apparently briefly cracked some Israeli music chart, though none of the sources appears to be a solid WP:RS. Smells like paid editing, Prod was disputed. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) clpo13( talk) 06:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Not a notable term or subgenre. Koala15 ( talk) 02:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. North America 1000 23:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
Only sources are dead links, does not appear to meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG Melcous ( talk) 00:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)