The result was nomination withdrawn. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) JMHamo ( talk) 22:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails
WP:NACTOR and
WP:GNG, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent
JMHamo (
talk)
23:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 23:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 23:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Non notable. Fails gng and pornbio, Spartaz Humbug! 23:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Nominations don't count as the award win is not a significant award and the category was only awarded twice anyway. Therefore fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 23:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Scene awards no longer count. Interviews are primary not secondary sources so fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 22:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, only one reference to their own website, tagged for notability for 5 years. Theroadislong ( talk) 22:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. Canadian Paul 18:32, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This article highlights the craziness happening in the World's Oldest Persons area. Between the visible and hidden (click edit on article to see hidden) claims, Rosa Rein is supposed to be the on the lists for both super old people born in Poland and born in Germany, the oldest Jew at some point, super old people from Switzerland, super old people in the EU (except Switzerland is not in the EU), nth oldest person here there and somewhere and to hold assorted national longevity records. How to sort this all out? Delete the article per WP:NOPAGE (there is barely any bio info to put anywhere), ignore the confusing "record" claims, and reduce the slice and dice lists based on arbitrary criteria that has nothing to do with age. Legacypac ( talk) 22:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Article has been expanded, retracting comment. CommanderLinx ( talk) 07:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
*Delete and/or Redirect to one of the five or so lists she's on. No justifying a standalone article. Taking out the unsourced trivia about her longevity leaves you with a name, age and country. Put her on a list.
CommanderLinx (
talk)
08:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC) This editor has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Person does not appear notable. Only reference is from firm he works for. WP editor may be related to subject based on username. Bahooka ( talk) 21:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR and WP:TIND. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 18:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I do not think there are any merit in this article to make it ever worth keeping as everything there is WP:OR, also it is missing WP:V and lacking WP:CITE, making this article not worth existing. A topic that fails WP:GNG. Donnie Park ( talk) 21:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Do not mistake this with the Pennsylvania band, this group had no charting singles are barely mentioned in any sources. Two sources are a variation of discogs and the other two are for another band. Clearly fails notability. ABriefPassing ( talk) 20:41, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Garagepunk66 ( talk) 20:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deleted as unsourced BLP. The Bushranger One ping only 00:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I was actually PRODing this until I noticed the first AfD and it's certainly time for a new one since November 2005. My original PROD: "Nothing to currently suggest fully satisfying model notability guidelines and the best my searches found were only a few trivial local news.". Notifying the only still active past AfDers Yamaguchi先生 and Herostratus. SwisterTwister talk 20:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. I am happy to draft/Userfy upon request. kelapstick( bainuu) 05:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
This article does not have independent sources to establish notability. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete; admitted hoax. Good catch. Antandrus (talk) 23:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable neologism food item, with no citations. Could almost be a speedy deletion, but has lasted long enough to bring to AfD. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to LocalLabs. Sandstein 09:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Almost all sources that talk about this website simply talk about how it violates privacy and enables stalkers. Doesn't otherwise state notability. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Extensibility. Sandstein 09:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
This page is almost word for word the same as this page from the Perl Design Patterns Book. It has been flagged as a how-to article and for not meeting Wikipedia's standards since 2009. -- Pleasantville ( talk) 16:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
"Paranuclear" doesn't seem to be a term that is actually used. All references I've found refer back to this wikipedia page except for this one single article referring to Japan as a "paranuclear state". There just isn't enough material here to justify an article. It could potentially be moved to Nuclear capable state or some such which does seem to have at least some use. It also feels a lot like original research. Most of the references that the article has are either dead or barely relevant and I haven't been able to find anything more on this subject. Vectoor ( talk) 16:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 03:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Does not satisfy WP:BLP. Her only claim to significance is having written a book and having collated music pieces for a music album. Certainly not enough to be in an encyclopaedia. kashmiri TALK 16:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. entirely unsourced and highly promotional Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:56, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable org, reads like an advertisement JMHamo ( talk) 15:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirecting would perhaps require a separate discussion. Sandstein 09:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Recent original reserach WP:SYNTH putting two close officially recogniozed ethnic groups Karachays and Balkars into one. Not a single of 20+ other language wikipedias have such article. True, they have same roots and close history, but they are different nations today. By same logic one may merge Austrians and Germans into same page, and if you try to merge Serbs and Croats into Serbo-Croats (as in " Serbo-Croatian language"), they both cut your throat. - üser:Altenmann >t 00:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
This festival does not exist anymore and none of the links or references work Diana Ringo ( talk) 13:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by DGG per CSD#A1. ( Non-admin closure.) Sideways713 ( talk) 22:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Article is written like an Advertisement. Zyc1174 ( talk) 12:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
promotional for non notable individual. Lacks coverage about her in independent reliable sources. Current bombardment of sources is by her, passing mentions, quotes from her, her talking about herself and press releases. Books lack reviews. No major awards. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be consolidated into List_of_Spanish_supercentenarians#Joan_Riudavets where I have already added his short bio. The content about him not being the oldest person in Spain and who succeed who as oldest where is just confusing and best handled on the appropriate list elsewhere. Legacypac ( talk) 11:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are not based in policy or practice. Sandstein 09:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable radio/TV personality. Mrfrobinson ( talk) 02:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 18:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a television chef, based entirely on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES without even the first hint of a reliable, independent source anywhere in the entire article. Further, while the overall tone isn't blatant enough to trigger my CSD G11 reflex, there are some passages of obvious advertorial writing here (e.g. "He is very passionate about creating globally inspired dished but, using local ingredient with a large emphesis on sustainable seafood.") He might certainly qualify for an article that was sourced properly, but that's not what this article is. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 23:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 18:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Fighting in WW2 doesn't make him notable nor does his various club boxing championships. The closest thing to notability was once winning two fights at an amateur Polish championship before losing. That might be enough to technically meet WP:NBOX but that criteria is so broad that I think either more boxing success or significant independent coverage is required to show notability. Mdtemp ( talk) 15:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 03:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 07:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly questionably notable and improvable band article as my searches simply found no better coverage aside from some interviews and other passing mentions here. As heavy metal is not my area, I'm notifying users interested with heavy metal for their insight Drmies, The Bushranger, Peridon and The Blade of the Northern Lights for any comments they may have. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW as part of the Chaneyverse cleanup - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Chaney. The Bushranger One ping only 07:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Another Warren Chaney-related article (see also 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8). It's poor form to remove a whole bunch of content from an article right before nominating it for deletion. That was not my intention, but I'm also loathe to restore that content just for the sake of decorum. Here is the previous version of the article. I started looking through the articles of the now-blocked socks for the usual glut of unreliable catalog/database/primary sources that characterizes the bunch and didn't even realize I had removed all of the sources from this one. It looks to fail WP:NFILM, but at best this is a WP:TNT scenario, having been created/written primarily by a sock puppet and having no reliable sources at all. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW as part of the Chaneyverse cleanup - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Chaney. The Bushranger One ping only 07:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
This is another Warren Chaney related article and the issues are the same. For more information on this, see the AfDs for Space Patrol Chronicles, America: A Call to Greatness, and Dynamic Mind.
Long story short, this was an article created by an SPA and while it makes some grandiose claims, ultimately it lacks any truly independent reliable sources. All of the links refer to either IMDb or the filmmaker's website. The only review is posted on the filmmaker's website and cannot be verified as existing anywhere else. It's possible that the review might not even exist, given the overall trouble with Chaney related articles. A search brought up nothing to show that this film is notable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Article tagged as possibly non-notable since May 2008. Subject fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG - all citations provided are either non-independent, don't discuss the subject at all, or are non-reliable. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 15:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 20:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to be a notable enough person for an article. QueenCake ( talk) 20:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
No independent sources attest notability. Biruitorul Talk 20:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Article about a band which makes no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, and which is resting entirely on primary sources like their own webpage, their own Facebook, a profile on JamBase and a directory of sound clips on archive.org — no indication of any reliable source coverage has been shown here. As always, a band is not automatically entitled to keep an article on Wikipedia just because they existed — inclusion is governed by the availability of RS coverage which demonstrates that they've passed a notability criterion. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 19:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. While there's strangely been no input on this, there has been substantial time allowed for discussion and no objections to deletion have been raised whatsoever, therefore I will treat this as we would an uncontested PROD. Swarm ♠ 23:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Not enough WP:RS to support a profile Usterday ( talk) 18:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 18:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a political strategist. While a deputy chief of staff in the PMO could certainly be eligible for a Wikipedia article if the volume of sourcing were strong enough to satisfy WP:GNG, it's not a position that confers an automatic entitlement to a Wikipedia article just because the person exists — but of the four sources here, three of them just namecheck his existence rather than being coverage of him, and the fourth is a primary source. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 16:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 21:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable martial artist. Coverage is from primary sources so WP:GNG is not met and I don't see anything to shows he meets WP:MANOTE. Mdtemp ( talk) 15:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Claims cannot be verified and appears to be promotional. — Sanskari Hangout 15:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 21:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Notability is not inherited. Article only created because subject is Ringo Starr's daughter.
There is nothing in this BLP that justifies its inclusion; apart from her famous parent, there is nothing remotely significant about the subject. There are only a few sources in the article at present: a couple of tabloids mention a small boutique that she briefly co-owned, and one that says she had a tumour removed. Hillbillyholiday talk 21:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Ordinarily, a relative of a celebrity should only have their own independent article if and when it can be reliably sourced that they have done something significant and notable in their own right, and would thereby merit an independent article even if they didn't have a famous relative.There isn't anything in the article that would be enough for someone not related to a Beatle to be considered notable. Egsan Bacon ( talk) 05:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP, actually an evident WP:AUTOBIO if you compare the creator's username to the article's "current work" section, of a magazine publisher and film producer. There are legitimate claims of notability being made here, but the problem is that they aren't being sourced properly. Almost everything here is resting on primary sources, rather than reliable source coverage in which he's the subject — for instance, his editorship of Genre cites a mere repetition of the name Genre as the "source" for itself, rather than any news article in some other publication writing about his editorship of Genre; a purported appearance on Anderson Cooper 360 is sourced only to a simple repetition of the name Anderson Cooper 360 rather than to any independent media coverage of his appearance on that program; purported appearances on "several (unnamed) CBS programs" is sourced only to a repetition of the name CBS rather than any non-affiliated media coverage of those appearances; and on, and so forth. The creator appears to deeply misunderstand what "sourcing" means on Wikipedia; the article was previously tagged for blpprod for lacking any actual sourcing, but the creator removed that tag with the claim that the article was well-sourced. But it isn't, because things can't just be sourced to themselves. And the creator also needs to familiarize himself with our conflict of interest rules, in particular the parts that militate against starting an article about yourself. Better sourcing might certainly exist in subscription news databases that I don't have access to, but Google News offers up almost exclusively glancing namechecks and blogs rather than substantive coverage in real media. I'm certainly willing to withdraw this nomination if somebody can repair it with proper reliable source coverage beyond anything I've been able to locate, but in this state it's a delete. Bearcat ( talk) 06:30, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:NOT. We are not a guide of how to, which is what the article is. Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 00:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
No indication of any reliable secondary coverage. Promo. Very unfocused John from Idegon ( talk) 00:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be userfied on request. Sandstein 09:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable, fails WP:NMUSIC JMHamo ( talk) 03:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 02:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
This girl has not actually won any pageant, with most of the article detailing how other people won, and how another girl was sent to another pageant instead of her. Her film work seems pretty unnotable, sourced only to the unreliable iMDB. The entire article on the TV series she has been in lacks sources except for two showing it was syndicated. Legacypac ( talk) 02:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
There is some objection off on a user page to me referring to the subject as a girl as the subject is today 24. At the time she was in the pageants the article says she was under 18 which is in fact a child. Anyway, no offense intended. If there are better sources and the article can be upgraded, great. I don't mind a good article at all. Legacypac ( talk) 00:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable bio on a DJ that is getting started. I'm not finding adequate
sourcing material when checking.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
01:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
What am I missing here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howard McFly ( talk • contribs) 01:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 08:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND, non-notable; unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. JMHamo ( talk) 00:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) JMHamo ( talk) 22:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails
WP:NACTOR and
WP:GNG, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent
JMHamo (
talk)
23:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 23:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:50, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 23:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Non notable. Fails gng and pornbio, Spartaz Humbug! 23:16, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Nominations don't count as the award win is not a significant award and the category was only awarded twice anyway. Therefore fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 23:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Scene awards no longer count. Interviews are primary not secondary sources so fails gng and pornbio Spartaz Humbug! 22:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:22, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
No evidence of notability, only one reference to their own website, tagged for notability for 5 years. Theroadislong ( talk) 22:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was withdrawn. Canadian Paul 18:32, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
This article highlights the craziness happening in the World's Oldest Persons area. Between the visible and hidden (click edit on article to see hidden) claims, Rosa Rein is supposed to be the on the lists for both super old people born in Poland and born in Germany, the oldest Jew at some point, super old people from Switzerland, super old people in the EU (except Switzerland is not in the EU), nth oldest person here there and somewhere and to hold assorted national longevity records. How to sort this all out? Delete the article per WP:NOPAGE (there is barely any bio info to put anywhere), ignore the confusing "record" claims, and reduce the slice and dice lists based on arbitrary criteria that has nothing to do with age. Legacypac ( talk) 22:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Article has been expanded, retracting comment. CommanderLinx ( talk) 07:22, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
*Delete and/or Redirect to one of the five or so lists she's on. No justifying a standalone article. Taking out the unsourced trivia about her longevity leaves you with a name, age and country. Put her on a list.
CommanderLinx (
talk)
08:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC) This editor has made
few or no other edits outside this topic.
.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Person does not appear notable. Only reference is from firm he works for. WP editor may be related to subject based on username. Bahooka ( talk) 21:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR and WP:TIND. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 18:34, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I do not think there are any merit in this article to make it ever worth keeping as everything there is WP:OR, also it is missing WP:V and lacking WP:CITE, making this article not worth existing. A topic that fails WP:GNG. Donnie Park ( talk) 21:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Do not mistake this with the Pennsylvania band, this group had no charting singles are barely mentioned in any sources. Two sources are a variation of discogs and the other two are for another band. Clearly fails notability. ABriefPassing ( talk) 20:41, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Garagepunk66 ( talk) 20:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Deleted as unsourced BLP. The Bushranger One ping only 00:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
I was actually PRODing this until I noticed the first AfD and it's certainly time for a new one since November 2005. My original PROD: "Nothing to currently suggest fully satisfying model notability guidelines and the best my searches found were only a few trivial local news.". Notifying the only still active past AfDers Yamaguchi先生 and Herostratus. SwisterTwister talk 20:21, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. I am happy to draft/Userfy upon request. kelapstick( bainuu) 05:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
This article does not have independent sources to establish notability. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 01:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was Delete; admitted hoax. Good catch. Antandrus (talk) 23:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable neologism food item, with no citations. Could almost be a speedy deletion, but has lasted long enough to bring to AfD. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:38, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to LocalLabs. Sandstein 09:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Almost all sources that talk about this website simply talk about how it violates privacy and enables stalkers. Doesn't otherwise state notability. JTtheOG ( talk) 18:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete and redirect to Extensibility. Sandstein 09:16, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
This page is almost word for word the same as this page from the Perl Design Patterns Book. It has been flagged as a how-to article and for not meeting Wikipedia's standards since 2009. -- Pleasantville ( talk) 16:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
"Paranuclear" doesn't seem to be a term that is actually used. All references I've found refer back to this wikipedia page except for this one single article referring to Japan as a "paranuclear state". There just isn't enough material here to justify an article. It could potentially be moved to Nuclear capable state or some such which does seem to have at least some use. It also feels a lot like original research. Most of the references that the article has are either dead or barely relevant and I haven't been able to find anything more on this subject. Vectoor ( talk) 16:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 03:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Does not satisfy WP:BLP. Her only claim to significance is having written a book and having collated music pieces for a music album. Certainly not enough to be in an encyclopaedia. kashmiri TALK 16:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy delete. entirely unsourced and highly promotional Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:56, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable org, reads like an advertisement JMHamo ( talk) 15:15, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Redirecting would perhaps require a separate discussion. Sandstein 09:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Recent original reserach WP:SYNTH putting two close officially recogniozed ethnic groups Karachays and Balkars into one. Not a single of 20+ other language wikipedias have such article. True, they have same roots and close history, but they are different nations today. By same logic one may merge Austrians and Germans into same page, and if you try to merge Serbs and Croats into Serbo-Croats (as in " Serbo-Croatian language"), they both cut your throat. - üser:Altenmann >t 00:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
This festival does not exist anymore and none of the links or references work Diana Ringo ( talk) 13:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedily deleted by DGG per CSD#A1. ( Non-admin closure.) Sideways713 ( talk) 22:58, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Article is written like an Advertisement. Zyc1174 ( talk) 12:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
promotional for non notable individual. Lacks coverage about her in independent reliable sources. Current bombardment of sources is by her, passing mentions, quotes from her, her talking about herself and press releases. Books lack reviews. No major awards. duffbeerforme ( talk) 11:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be consolidated into List_of_Spanish_supercentenarians#Joan_Riudavets where I have already added his short bio. The content about him not being the oldest person in Spain and who succeed who as oldest where is just confusing and best handled on the appropriate list elsewhere. Legacypac ( talk) 11:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are not based in policy or practice. Sandstein 09:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable radio/TV personality. Mrfrobinson ( talk) 02:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 18:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a television chef, based entirely on WP:PRIMARYSOURCES without even the first hint of a reliable, independent source anywhere in the entire article. Further, while the overall tone isn't blatant enough to trigger my CSD G11 reflex, there are some passages of obvious advertorial writing here (e.g. "He is very passionate about creating globally inspired dished but, using local ingredient with a large emphesis on sustainable seafood.") He might certainly qualify for an article that was sourced properly, but that's not what this article is. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 23:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 18:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Fighting in WW2 doesn't make him notable nor does his various club boxing championships. The closest thing to notability was once winning two fights at an amateur Polish championship before losing. That might be enough to technically meet WP:NBOX but that criteria is so broad that I think either more boxing success or significant independent coverage is required to show notability. Mdtemp ( talk) 15:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. joe decker talk 03:46, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai ( talk) 07:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Seemingly questionably notable and improvable band article as my searches simply found no better coverage aside from some interviews and other passing mentions here. As heavy metal is not my area, I'm notifying users interested with heavy metal for their insight Drmies, The Bushranger, Peridon and The Blade of the Northern Lights for any comments they may have. SwisterTwister talk 07:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW as part of the Chaneyverse cleanup - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Chaney. The Bushranger One ping only 07:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Another Warren Chaney-related article (see also 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8). It's poor form to remove a whole bunch of content from an article right before nominating it for deletion. That was not my intention, but I'm also loathe to restore that content just for the sake of decorum. Here is the previous version of the article. I started looking through the articles of the now-blocked socks for the usual glut of unreliable catalog/database/primary sources that characterizes the bunch and didn't even realize I had removed all of the sources from this one. It looks to fail WP:NFILM, but at best this is a WP:TNT scenario, having been created/written primarily by a sock puppet and having no reliable sources at all. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 05:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. WP:SNOW as part of the Chaneyverse cleanup - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Chaney. The Bushranger One ping only 07:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
This is another Warren Chaney related article and the issues are the same. For more information on this, see the AfDs for Space Patrol Chronicles, America: A Call to Greatness, and Dynamic Mind.
Long story short, this was an article created by an SPA and while it makes some grandiose claims, ultimately it lacks any truly independent reliable sources. All of the links refer to either IMDb or the filmmaker's website. The only review is posted on the filmmaker's website and cannot be verified as existing anywhere else. It's possible that the review might not even exist, given the overall trouble with Chaney related articles. A search brought up nothing to show that this film is notable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:56, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:45, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Article tagged as possibly non-notable since May 2008. Subject fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG - all citations provided are either non-independent, don't discuss the subject at all, or are non-reliable. FuriouslySerene ( talk) 15:14, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 20:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Subject does not appear to be a notable enough person for an article. QueenCake ( talk) 20:54, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Swarm ♠ 23:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
No independent sources attest notability. Biruitorul Talk 20:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Article about a band which makes no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, and which is resting entirely on primary sources like their own webpage, their own Facebook, a profile on JamBase and a directory of sound clips on archive.org — no indication of any reliable source coverage has been shown here. As always, a band is not automatically entitled to keep an article on Wikipedia just because they existed — inclusion is governed by the availability of RS coverage which demonstrates that they've passed a notability criterion. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 19:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. While there's strangely been no input on this, there has been substantial time allowed for discussion and no objections to deletion have been raised whatsoever, therefore I will treat this as we would an uncontested PROD. Swarm ♠ 23:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Not enough WP:RS to support a profile Usterday ( talk) 18:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk 18:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of a political strategist. While a deputy chief of staff in the PMO could certainly be eligible for a Wikipedia article if the volume of sourcing were strong enough to satisfy WP:GNG, it's not a position that confers an automatic entitlement to a Wikipedia article just because the person exists — but of the four sources here, three of them just namecheck his existence rather than being coverage of him, and the fourth is a primary source. Delete. Bearcat ( talk) 16:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mkdw talk 21:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable martial artist. Coverage is from primary sources so WP:GNG is not met and I don't see anything to shows he meets WP:MANOTE. Mdtemp ( talk) 15:55, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Claims cannot be verified and appears to be promotional. — Sanskari Hangout 15:11, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:41, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:GNG perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 21:23, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 17:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Notability is not inherited. Article only created because subject is Ringo Starr's daughter.
There is nothing in this BLP that justifies its inclusion; apart from her famous parent, there is nothing remotely significant about the subject. There are only a few sources in the article at present: a couple of tabloids mention a small boutique that she briefly co-owned, and one that says she had a tumour removed. Hillbillyholiday talk 21:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Ordinarily, a relative of a celebrity should only have their own independent article if and when it can be reliably sourced that they have done something significant and notable in their own right, and would thereby merit an independent article even if they didn't have a famous relative.There isn't anything in the article that would be enough for someone not related to a Beatle to be considered notable. Egsan Bacon ( talk) 05:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:40, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP, actually an evident WP:AUTOBIO if you compare the creator's username to the article's "current work" section, of a magazine publisher and film producer. There are legitimate claims of notability being made here, but the problem is that they aren't being sourced properly. Almost everything here is resting on primary sources, rather than reliable source coverage in which he's the subject — for instance, his editorship of Genre cites a mere repetition of the name Genre as the "source" for itself, rather than any news article in some other publication writing about his editorship of Genre; a purported appearance on Anderson Cooper 360 is sourced only to a simple repetition of the name Anderson Cooper 360 rather than to any independent media coverage of his appearance on that program; purported appearances on "several (unnamed) CBS programs" is sourced only to a repetition of the name CBS rather than any non-affiliated media coverage of those appearances; and on, and so forth. The creator appears to deeply misunderstand what "sourcing" means on Wikipedia; the article was previously tagged for blpprod for lacking any actual sourcing, but the creator removed that tag with the claim that the article was well-sourced. But it isn't, because things can't just be sourced to themselves. And the creator also needs to familiarize himself with our conflict of interest rules, in particular the parts that militate against starting an article about yourself. Better sourcing might certainly exist in subscription news databases that I don't have access to, but Google News offers up almost exclusively glancing namechecks and blogs rather than substantive coverage in real media. I'm certainly willing to withdraw this nomination if somebody can repair it with proper reliable source coverage beyond anything I've been able to locate, but in this state it's a delete. Bearcat ( talk) 06:30, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep ( non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik ( talk) 00:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WP:NOT. We are not a guide of how to, which is what the article is. Tom (LT) ( talk) 07:15, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 00:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
No indication of any reliable secondary coverage. Promo. Very unfocused John from Idegon ( talk) 00:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Can be userfied on request. Sandstein 09:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable, fails WP:NMUSIC JMHamo ( talk) 03:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK#1, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 02:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
This girl has not actually won any pageant, with most of the article detailing how other people won, and how another girl was sent to another pageant instead of her. Her film work seems pretty unnotable, sourced only to the unreliable iMDB. The entire article on the TV series she has been in lacks sources except for two showing it was syndicated. Legacypac ( talk) 02:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
There is some objection off on a user page to me referring to the subject as a girl as the subject is today 24. At the time she was in the pageants the article says she was under 18 which is in fact a child. Anyway, no offense intended. If there are better sources and the article can be upgraded, great. I don't mind a good article at all. Legacypac ( talk) 00:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:36, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Non-notable bio on a DJ that is getting started. I'm not finding adequate
sourcing material when checking.
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
01:20, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
What am I missing here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howard McFly ( talk • contribs) 01:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America 1000 08:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:BAND, non-notable; unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. JMHamo ( talk) 00:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)