The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable porno actor. Lots of references, but all smut industry PR fluff.
Раціональне анархіст (
talk) 04:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Best Supporting Actor AVN award satisfies PORNBIO.
Morbidthoughts (
talk) 06:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Of the article's four listed awards, two are awards for scenes, which do not satisfy
WP:PORNBIO; another award is not a major award; the final award is a best-supporting (which has not been regarded as a "major" award in other porn AfDs). Has not "made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre" or "been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" (therefore failing PORNBIO #2 and #3.--
Раціональне анархіст (
talk) 06:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)reply
In what other AfDs has a Best Supportinng Actor AVN Award not been considered major? This is an individual category for a well-known award, satisfying PORNBIO.
• Gene93k (
talk) 01:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Passes
WP:PORNBIO with the Best Supporting Actor AVN win and per my comments above.
• Gene93k (
talk) 01:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep - Note: the article in question here has been recently edited. Both the
Adam Film World Guide Award for "Best Actor, Film" and the
AVN Award for "Best Supporting Actor, Film" are "well-known and significant industry awards" under
PORNBIO. Best Actor & Best Supporting Actor Awards in other genres of film are also considered to be major awards.
This is another recent example of why recently-new Wikipedia editors (supposedly only a couple of month's old in this specific case) shouldn't be allowed at AfD.
Guy1890 (
talk) 07:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable porno actor. Lots of references, but all smut industry PR fluff.
Раціональне анархіст (
talk) 04:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep - Best Supporting Actor AVN award satisfies PORNBIO.
Morbidthoughts (
talk) 06:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Of the article's four listed awards, two are awards for scenes, which do not satisfy
WP:PORNBIO; another award is not a major award; the final award is a best-supporting (which has not been regarded as a "major" award in other porn AfDs). Has not "made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre" or "been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" (therefore failing PORNBIO #2 and #3.--
Раціональне анархіст (
talk) 06:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)reply
In what other AfDs has a Best Supportinng Actor AVN Award not been considered major? This is an individual category for a well-known award, satisfying PORNBIO.
• Gene93k (
talk) 01:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Passes
WP:PORNBIO with the Best Supporting Actor AVN win and per my comments above.
• Gene93k (
talk) 01:58, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
Strong Keep - Note: the article in question here has been recently edited. Both the
Adam Film World Guide Award for "Best Actor, Film" and the
AVN Award for "Best Supporting Actor, Film" are "well-known and significant industry awards" under
PORNBIO. Best Actor & Best Supporting Actor Awards in other genres of film are also considered to be major awards.
This is another recent example of why recently-new Wikipedia editors (supposedly only a couple of month's old in this specific case) shouldn't be allowed at AfD.
Guy1890 (
talk) 07:31, 3 January 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.