![]() |
< 17 January | 19 January > |
---|
The result was keep. The keep side has shown that there are sufficient sources which can or have been cited. The main argument of the delete side is that there is nothing special, and that we would end up with 19110 articles on each bilateral relation. This is not a valid deletion rationale - Wikipedia is not on paper, and with 4 million articles already, 19110 is a relatively small number. Der yck C. 16:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
fails WP:GNG. this article is based on a 2006 meeting between the prime ministers where they promised the usual want to cooperate more. no evidence of actual relations like trade, migration etc. LibStar ( talk) 00:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 17:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Just a man with a job, nothing special. Article looks like an advertisement. The Banner talk 21:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. This is a clear keep close, but I'll leave the rename suggestion (and other proposals) to a discussion on the talk page. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Possibly a notable topic for the NFL. In my WP:BEFORE I found a few articles talking about the 5000 yard records (see talk).
But the vast majority of the content of this list is for Canadian football, a game with very different rules. There are multiple entries in the list who have over 6000 yards, and many in the high 5000s. Seems like 5000 is not a notable accomplishment in CFL.
If the article maintains its CFL focus, I think this list has a WP:NOTABILITY issue. If it is a combined list, then I think there is WP:WP:LISTCRUFT as it is combining records from two different sports
If it goes down to just NFL, I could see it passing the notability bar due to the few refs, and that the 5000 mark seems to be rare and record breaking. Gaijin42 ( talk) 21:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per A7 by Anthony Bradbury. ( non-admin closure) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete - Subject is not notable in any way, appeared in a couple of episodes of a soap many years ago and that's it, Do we really need Wikipedia articles for extras? Aleczandah ( talk) 21:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C) 00:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The person referred to in this article is a fictional character from a Bollywood movie Asoka (made in 2001)and not a historical character. Kaurwaki was the birth name of one of Ashoka's wife who was later renamed Tishyaraksha and became the mother of Tivala. It was Padmavati who led an army against him. Devi, a Buddhist, was his first and most favourite wife as well as the empress consort and it was she who sponsored charity. The article is also inconsistent. The first sentence refers to her being a fisherwoman and the last refers to her as a princess. The marriage was forcible in one para yet referred to as loving in another. Roopshah ( talk) 16:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 00:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Insufficient reliable source material exists about this person's life to create a reasonable article about him. Jayron 32 16:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was Userfy.. MBisanz talk 17:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Concern was Fails WP:GNG and hasn't played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 15:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete both List of people named Jacob and Jacob (given name). Wikipedia is not a directory and the previous deletion discussions of this kind have shown that such lists of common names are too indiscriminate. So we should focus on the name itself in terms of etymology, ancient references, etc. This has already been done at Jacob (name) which page name serves as a generic disambiguation and shouldn't need any refinement. De728631 ( talk) 16:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This page was at Jacob (given name), but I recently moved it to this title in order to better describe the contents. The anthroponymy page for this name is currently at Jacob (name). Where there are relatively few notable people with a given name, we list then on the anthroponymy page, but in the case of a popular name like Jacob, we just provide a link to all pages beginning with that name. There are about 800 pages in this case, too many to list; see All pages with titles beginning with Jacob. I once proposed at WP:WikiProject Anthroponymy that it might be possible to seek consensus over a list of the most notable out of a large number with a name, but this approach was rejected. Rather than include a woefully incomplete list in the encyclopedia, the page should be deleted. Note that the listed persons known by the name Jacob alone are already also listed at Jacob (disambiguation) in accordance with MOS:DABNAME. I should also disclose that, in accordance with that guidance, I recently split some content from the disambiguation page to this list. – Fayenatic L ondon 14:39, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Previously deleted by PROD back in July 2008; nothing has changed, this player remains non-notable and fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 14:29, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Jilly Cooper. There is small consensus to merge. Since the nominator hasn't said anything against it, I'll go ahead and close this AfD. ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 21:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unaired television programme: made in 2007, this was due to be aired in 2008 or 2009 but was apparently never broadcast. As such, it seems unnecessary to have an article about it, particularly one that still describes it as 'upcoming'. Though there are a few sources, I don't think this is considered notable under our guidelines. Robofish ( talk) 12:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to East Antarctica Ranges. MBisanz talk 17:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Totally arbitrary division. Why is 2000+ a notable division and not say, 3000, 4000 or any other x000 number? Why just those on the east, and not the west, which is currently redlinked? Also, there are lots of other, better organized and sourced lists of Antarctica's mountains. Prod declined for no reason. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted WP:CSD#A7 by Jimfbleak ( talk). JohnCD ( talk) 12:56, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Article lacks reliable references and fails to meet notability guidelines for software. YuMa NuMa Contrib 11:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There is a question here about notability but no general agreement. Some sources have been provided in the article, so I see no policy mandating deletion, and so this will default with the no consensus result. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD with Starred in two television series and recurred in three others. Biographical article about an actor. Six pages into a Google search I can't seem to find anything that would establish basic notability under WP:GNG, and also fails WP:ACTOR as far as I can tell. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq ( talk) 17:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The article is about a community organization, which takes donations and promotes community forum. The google search result for JAINA gives
[6] only one result of community website of JAINA -
[7]. The article does pass
WP:ORG and should be deleted as per also speedy deletion criteria No, G11: Unambiguous advertising. As the article promotes non notable names of persons awarded by them. Besides organization - JAINA, asks for donations in its website link
[8] and therefore it seems it has been created for self-advertisement.
Jethwarp (
talk)
08:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This was speedied as the game is allegedly breaching the original rights but non of the content was a copyvio and that interpretation for a speedy didn't gain traction at the DRV discussion. Despite that, this is clearly something that is unsourced and doesn't, on the face of it, meet our inclusion criteria so I am listing this for discussion per the DRV. As I a procedural listing connected to the DRV close I make no personal recommendation. Spartaz Humbug! 08:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 00:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This religion appears to be non-notable. I wasn't able to find any reliable sources online. The little green pig ( talk) 07:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
I'm just trying to introduce the subject. Perhaps it's not ready yet for wikipedia. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's not. The website for it has just started, there is no mention of it outside of online forums. I think it may be better to revisit this in a few years.
I understand if it must be deleted. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackspiritpubs ( talk • contribs) 07:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
I can't see any notability for the band, no major label, no hits, only an opening act for bigger groups. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Effects of cannabis. ( non-admin closure) TBr and ley ( what's up) 15:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Only cites 3 studies after 3 years as an article - questionable notability. petrarchan47 t c 07:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 04:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Subject does not meet notability requirements and the BLP lacks references. YuMa NuMa Contrib 03:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Subject of the article lacks notability and article is not referenced with reliable independent sources. A quick Google search also fails to verify or find any of the aforementioned elements and confirm the existence of the film, hence it's clearly non-notable. Speedy delete if applicable. YuMa NuMa Contrib 02:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C) 00:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is basically genealogy-cruft, there is little here beyond genealogy, the only non-trivial mention of her seems to be in one historical novel, which does not confer notability. PatGallacher ( talk) 02:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. However I have no objection to userfying or incubating upon request. Salvidrim! ✉ 00:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is a tough one for me to call, because I do actually like some of the stuff these guys produce, but with a complete lack of any significant coverage in any reliable sources leads me to conclude that, aside from cursory mentions in the game articles, this group just isn't notable enough to have an article, and a redirect would be problematic. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This article provides no reliable sources on the subject, and I am unable to find any through Google Books, News, or Scholar, despite the claims the article makes for his importance. It's possible there's another, more common spelling of his name, but I can't find it, nor can I turn up any references to his organization "Human Rights International" (there's an Italian NGO by this name, but he doesn't seem to be a part of it), or his book of poems "Flames of Thoughts". (I don't speak Urdu, though, so my searches were limited to English-only.) So I thought I'd put this article up for AfD trial by fire; I'd be happy if somebody can turn up some sources and fill this one out, but I wasn't able to do it myself. Khazar2 ( talk) 19:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C) 00:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable club - the claims to notability are weak (6th in the country but not by a credible organisation). No evidence that a notable competition has been held here. Biker Biker ( talk) 18:00, 27 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 00:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH--does not have in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. There are sources but most are press releases, blogs, or passing mentions. A Google News search did not turn up much more. Promotional article by now-blocked editor. Logical Cowboy ( talk) 17:47, 26 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Consensus to keep following relisting The Bushranger One ping only 00:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Multiple recreations, by it's own admission it has a main purpose to promote small businesses, Maybe I'm off base here but I believe that this might warrant coverage under the main government page but think that it fails gng for a standalone article. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 00:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Comment - I have done major additions and improvement to the article. Jethwarp ( talk) 06:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 17:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is a new article where the notability of the subject may not meet Wikipedia's guidelines. On a News search on Google and Bing there are few hits, and the great majority of those are passing mentions. There are a huge number of references given in the article, but not much substance to many of them. I am not sure whether it should be deleted and am nominating it in order to get a consensus view. Please see the related article Matt Fellowes which comes from the same contributor and has the same issues. David_FLXD (Talk) 04:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC) David_FLXD (Talk) 04:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is not a new article; HelloWallet has had a wikipedia page for the past 2+ years. The references in the article come from independent, reliable sources and directly relate to HelloWallet as a company. While I do have a COI, I am open about it and believe I have made responsible edits that are unbiased, factual, and informative. I requested help from editors in IRC groups and consequently edited the article accordingly. ElisabethLesser ( talk) 18:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This user David seems suspicious to me. This page has been up for 2.5 years. Why the issue now? And, why is he misrepresenting the facts? There are "64,100" links to this organization in Google, not a "few." And, it has been up for a long time with no objection. Why is he suggesting it has not been? This is suspicious. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biography where you will find: "like a profile or curriculum vitae (résumé), a biography presents a subject's life story," This entry takes available data points and constructs a story, like hundreds of other company profiles. If David disagrees with that story, than he can suggest an alternative with other available data points. But, don't make up facts. That is suspicious. I see no reason for deletion. I just did a news search and see that this company is partially owned by Steve Case, and that it was just featured in the Wall Street Journal last Sunday. Although, I guess David's advice would be that biographers should ignore media coverage? I better tell my college history professor to change his curriculum. -- ConcernedReader2 ( talk) 05:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)— ConcernedReader2 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Yes, you are right. It is 17 months and not 30 months. In any case, your argument is again suspicious. Notability is a subjective term, so it is in the eye of the beholder. But, when I think of lack of notability, I think of someone like you or me. I don't think of a company that seems to have been named by ABC News, one of the major US networks, as one of the 5 coolest US start-ups, or a company that seems to be frequently quoted in the top US papers in America. They also seem to have raised millions of dollars, including from one of America's most successful and wealthiest technology leaders, which by itself makes them one of the most notable US young companies. I also don't think of someone who seems to have won a Top 100 GameChanger from Huffington Post along with people like Steve Jobs, has testified in front of the U.S. Congress, and is cited by a US President and one of the most famous politicians in the 21st century. Seriously, you seem to have some kind of ulterior motive here. If you think that the facts have been misrepresented, edit them. But, don't make up facts to justify your points. It is highly suspicious. -- ConcernedReader2 ( talk) 20:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
All sources except (6) look like secondary in depth sources from reliable publishers. Sources (1) and (3) are of nationwide significance and you could argue that (4) and (5) are, too. There seem to multiple secondary reliable sources for this topic, which suggests that the topic is notable. The article could be made more neutral and the references list could be thinned to just the reliable sources, but these are matters of editing and don't suggest that deletion is needed here. Mark viking ( talk) 02:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Genesis Be fails WP:BIO; there is a lack of significant coverage from secondary reliable sources to assert her notability. The references present in the article are either blogs, dead links, or don't mention the subject at all. — ξ xplicit 01:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Pyrajenn: I've removed or replaced dead links or links that do not mention subject at all. I've also deleted statements that may be deemed subjective or promoting the subject rather than have a neutral tone. Please review again and offer any other corrections that may need to be done in order to make the page valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrajenn ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect. Scottdale Inferno → Professional Inline Hockey Association#Teams, San Jose Pirates → American Inline Hockey League#Teams ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 21:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 21:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Short stubby article with no references that indicate notability
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Subject fails WP:NOTABILITY for WP:CORP. Has some links but trivial coverage or mentions fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Lacks "significant coverage in independent reliable sources" WP:GNG Hu12 ( talk) 04:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 21:37, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
no assertion of notability. needs sources as fails WP:GN / WP:ORG Widefox; talk 21:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Sunil Kumar Verma. MBisanz talk 17:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non- notable poem written by a scientist who, although marginally notable, is not noted as a poet. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 17:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Davis Langdon & Seah . MBisanz talk 17:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Run of the mill company and spamish. Also, Wikipedia is not a business directory. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 19:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non notable TV series - yet to screen. No independent sources in article and g search only shows press release type hits. NtheP ( talk) 19:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Independant of HGTV: ESPN episode preview: http://espn.go.com/blog/playbook/trending/post/_/id/12496/scoring-the-deal-finds-homes-for-athletes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiffany1gr ( talk • contribs) 21:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/realestate/all-eyes-on-the-ball-not-the-condos.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.200.224.201 ( talk) 17:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Scoring the Deal. The Bushranger One ping only 09:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company which seems to be pinning notability on association with a new reality TV show (that hasn't yet) screened. Only references are not independent and there do not appear any reliable sources about the company. NtheP ( talk) 19:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Notable and reliable sources on The Abrams Team and its association with the reality show "Scoring the Deal" https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1g-WTa06xbcTDRsTms3aFp3QTg/edit http://therealdeal.com/blog/2013/01/02/celebrity-broker-discusses-sport-y-role-on-new-hgtv-show-video/ https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1g-WTa06xbcRUFabWNXZ3NhWDQ/edit http://news.yahoo.com/hgtvs-scoring-deal-cape-cods-priciest-properties-220000090.html http://therealdeal.com/blog/2013/01/02/celebrity-broker-discusses-sport-y-role-on-new-hgtv-show-video/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiffany1gr ( talk • contribs) 21:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/realestate/all-eyes-on-the-ball-not-the-condos.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.200.224.201 ( talk) 17:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Seems to fail WP:CORP. I can find no mention of this company in the usual places (Google News, Scholar, &c.), and the article itself makes no real claim to notability. Even the company's own web site has disappeared. Alexrexpvt ( talk) 17:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C) 00:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NCONCERT, tours need to receive extensive coverage from 3rd party reliable sources. A long indiscriminate list of concert tour dates is not necessary or notable. Its not even navigationally accessible. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 17:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Appears to be a minor manufacturing company at most, with the usual handful of self-published press releases. Might be savable, but it's not making a good case for notability as yet. Andy Dingley ( talk) 11:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 17:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete - Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (people) guidlines.Does not cite sufficient and verifiable references.-- Ntmg ( talk) 17:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Fijit Friends. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable toy. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 21:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Merge and redirect as above, not notable enough for own article. TheLongTone ( talk) 09:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Fijit Friends. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable toy. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 21:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Nicolas Cage#Relationships and family. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The son of Nicholas Cage. Appeared in two films in extremely minor roles, and "co-created" (aka lent his name to) a comic book with his father (The Cages were neither the writers nor artists). He has also been arrested. Not notable, and mentions in news sources are just that- mentions. No significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 20:16, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Keep and protect stub during ongoing content/merge discussions j⚛e decker talk 18:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This looks like a verbatim copy of somebody's thesis. It's impermissible original research. It may also be a neologism. NawlinWiki ( talk) 15:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar . MBisanz talk 17:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Seems to fail the GNG; lacking substantial coverage by independent sources. bobrayner ( talk) 15:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Acronym#Pseudo-acronyms. History retained so that someone can create a properly-sourced article out of this, because it's obviously a real concept, even if at the moment it's sources are dubious. Black Kite ( talk) 20:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The whole article stands on one single blog entry. Both WP:NEO and WP:N apply. There, I have an account ( talk) 15:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Not notable, no reliable or WP:verifiable sources. No GNews hits for either Mikindani Center of Hope or Hope Worldwide Kenya. 3 GBook hits, all sourced by Wikipedia (either Wikipedia Books LLC or VDM), no GHits of reliable sources. Article was tagged as dead end in 2010, no significant editing since. GregJackP Boomer! 01:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Article about an amateur race driver. Article states that he is a three times National Champion in hillclimbing in Bosnia and Herzegovina in his category of cars. This is sourced with an article in a local newspaper Google tranlation from Croatian. Following WP:NMOTORSPORT he is not notable, as he is an amateur. Is being a National Champion in a category of a niche sport (hillclimbing) enough for WP:NSPORTS? Researches don't give him enough hits for meeting GNG. This is a Wiedergänger, deleted per CSD in November. Ben Ben ( talk) 01:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to The E.N.D. The Bushranger One ping only 09:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable album release by The Black Eyed Peas. WP:HAMMER... very little information beyond a track listing. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 01:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete Non-notable type of dog; the only secondary references I could find are in this gigantic list of mutt portmanteaus and a brief entry in this book. Google Scholar doesn't turn up any results. Most of the google results are directly related to Bullnese breeders or are on sites that probably scraped the name from Wikipedia. TKK bark ! 19:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to R. Stevie Moore discography. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable musical recording. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. Mediran ( t • c) 09:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to The Beginning (The Black Eyed Peas album). ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NSONGS, notability aside, songs should only be given their own article where significant independent coverage is given from reliable sources. This has not received extensive coverage and the subject of it being released as part of an iTunes countdown is already covered on the album's page — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 01:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
All the information contained in these type of lists seems to fall under WP:IINFO. When the song entered the top 10, when it peaked, the number of weeks in the top 10 all seem extraneous. A previous discussion resulted in no consensus. There is List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2011 (Korea) and the like as well, but there is both significance for and much more interest in songs which reached number one and coverage beyond the chart provider is not difficult to find. A top 10 seems a bit more arbritary (it could be top 20, top 40, or why not the entire hot 100). Lists of number twos have been deleted in the past, so why do we need entire top 10s. This also isn't even the main national chart in Korea, so this sets up top 10 for any and all published charts. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 00:29, 29 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC) reply
There aren't any reliable sources listed in the article, and I can't find any online, so I don't think the subject passes WP:CORP. — Mr. Stradivarius ( have a chat) 16:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Devorah Rose. MBisanz talk 17:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Article was speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G11 (unambiguous promotion) then immediately recreated by the author as less promotional. The concern here is that while it contains assertions of significance, the three sources given do not suggest significant coverage; one is from the magazine itself and the others appear to have no relation to the subject. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 05:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Esben and the Witch (band). Tone 18:05, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Article about a single from a notable record, released by a notable band. I quote the author of the article: This song did not chart.. The one included reference is a secondary quote of a review of the band, not the single itself. Fails WP:NSONGS. I am also nominating two other articles about singles off the same EP, which suffer from the same issue:
§ FreeRangeFrog croak 18:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There were two who argued for a keep, but consensus is fairly clear the events here are news stories lacking encyclopedic significance. (While murders are the most serious of crimes, they do not in general merit separate articles, nor do they lend notability to the location where they occur.) There are also claims that "Murder Kroger" is a common (probably slang) nickname for the location, but the claim has not been backed up by reliable sourcing. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The sources are either unreliable (personal websites, YouTube, Facebook, MySpace), don't mention the Kroger (the book), don't use the term "Murder Kroger" (the AJC article), or are otherwise unreliable (Yelp). The only source that looks decent is this one. Everything else is just spam, personal websites, OR, and fancruft. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 07:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Delete (without prejudice to the inclusion of information like this into Manitoba general election, 1903, as that information already apparently exists at Prohibition in Canada) j⚛e decker talk 19:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Removed PROD per WP:PROD (Previous AfD exists). Rationale in PROD was: None of these candidates have articles, the 'party' has no article, none of them were elected. I can find no coverage in sources, and no indication that this topic meets the notability criteria for inclusion Illia Connell ( talk) 07:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Charles Seymour, 2nd Baron Seymour of Trowbridge. MBisanz talk 17:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete: Complete lack of any notability.
Quis separabit?
18:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
Comment There is a Frances Seymour (disambiguation) page, which should be at the primary if this article is deleted (and should be at the primary either way). Boleyn ( talk) 06:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Nominate for deletion Has been tagged as of doubtful notability for 6 years. Creator's response (see Talk:Sarkis Antikajian) doesn't convince me of notability. Tagged for speedy deletion in 2007 Boleyn ( talk) 18:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Nominate for deletion Received no consensus in 2007 AfD. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Has been tagged as of doubtful notability for 6 years. Boleyn ( talk) 18:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
A quick Google search in News (inc. archive), Books, and generally brings up absolutely nothing to show notability for this British fashion designer. One local news article here and stuff about charity work, but otherwise, nothing - and with a name so distinctive, any existing reliable sources you'd think would be easier to find. Refs in article are the Kent local news article, a BBC photo, and a dead link. Mabalu ( talk) 19:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unexplained PROD removal. It's a small free once a month newspaper that caters to Hampton Roads which includes Virginia Beach, the remaining six incorporated towns average a population of around 1,000 people. According to List of newspapers serving cities over 100,000 in the United States#Hampton Roads.2C Virginia there are a couple much larger newspapers in the area. As such, does not seem to satisfy WP:CORP/ WP:ORG. Mkdw talk 21:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 00:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Previous AfD lacked participation and not very compelling. I see no indication of notability. JayJay What did I do? 23:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
![]() |
< 17 January | 19 January > |
---|
The result was keep. The keep side has shown that there are sufficient sources which can or have been cited. The main argument of the delete side is that there is nothing special, and that we would end up with 19110 articles on each bilateral relation. This is not a valid deletion rationale - Wikipedia is not on paper, and with 4 million articles already, 19110 is a relatively small number. Der yck C. 16:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
fails WP:GNG. this article is based on a 2006 meeting between the prime ministers where they promised the usual want to cooperate more. no evidence of actual relations like trade, migration etc. LibStar ( talk) 00:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. MBisanz talk 17:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Just a man with a job, nothing special. Article looks like an advertisement. The Banner talk 21:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. This is a clear keep close, but I'll leave the rename suggestion (and other proposals) to a discussion on the talk page. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Possibly a notable topic for the NFL. In my WP:BEFORE I found a few articles talking about the 5000 yard records (see talk).
But the vast majority of the content of this list is for Canadian football, a game with very different rules. There are multiple entries in the list who have over 6000 yards, and many in the high 5000s. Seems like 5000 is not a notable accomplishment in CFL.
If the article maintains its CFL focus, I think this list has a WP:NOTABILITY issue. If it is a combined list, then I think there is WP:WP:LISTCRUFT as it is combining records from two different sports
If it goes down to just NFL, I could see it passing the notability bar due to the few refs, and that the 5000 mark seems to be rare and record breaking. Gaijin42 ( talk) 21:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per A7 by Anthony Bradbury. ( non-admin closure) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:22, 19 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete - Subject is not notable in any way, appeared in a couple of episodes of a soap many years ago and that's it, Do we really need Wikipedia articles for extras? Aleczandah ( talk) 21:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C) 00:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The person referred to in this article is a fictional character from a Bollywood movie Asoka (made in 2001)and not a historical character. Kaurwaki was the birth name of one of Ashoka's wife who was later renamed Tishyaraksha and became the mother of Tivala. It was Padmavati who led an army against him. Devi, a Buddhist, was his first and most favourite wife as well as the empress consort and it was she who sponsored charity. The article is also inconsistent. The first sentence refers to her being a fisherwoman and the last refers to her as a princess. The marriage was forcible in one para yet referred to as loving in another. Roopshah ( talk) 16:53, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 00:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Insufficient reliable source material exists about this person's life to create a reasonable article about him. Jayron 32 16:04, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was Userfy.. MBisanz talk 17:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Concern was Fails WP:GNG and hasn't played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by an IP without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 15:20, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete both List of people named Jacob and Jacob (given name). Wikipedia is not a directory and the previous deletion discussions of this kind have shown that such lists of common names are too indiscriminate. So we should focus on the name itself in terms of etymology, ancient references, etc. This has already been done at Jacob (name) which page name serves as a generic disambiguation and shouldn't need any refinement. De728631 ( talk) 16:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This page was at Jacob (given name), but I recently moved it to this title in order to better describe the contents. The anthroponymy page for this name is currently at Jacob (name). Where there are relatively few notable people with a given name, we list then on the anthroponymy page, but in the case of a popular name like Jacob, we just provide a link to all pages beginning with that name. There are about 800 pages in this case, too many to list; see All pages with titles beginning with Jacob. I once proposed at WP:WikiProject Anthroponymy that it might be possible to seek consensus over a list of the most notable out of a large number with a name, but this approach was rejected. Rather than include a woefully incomplete list in the encyclopedia, the page should be deleted. Note that the listed persons known by the name Jacob alone are already also listed at Jacob (disambiguation) in accordance with MOS:DABNAME. I should also disclose that, in accordance with that guidance, I recently split some content from the disambiguation page to this list. – Fayenatic L ondon 14:39, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Previously deleted by PROD back in July 2008; nothing has changed, this player remains non-notable and fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 14:29, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Jilly Cooper. There is small consensus to merge. Since the nominator hasn't said anything against it, I'll go ahead and close this AfD. ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 21:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unaired television programme: made in 2007, this was due to be aired in 2008 or 2009 but was apparently never broadcast. As such, it seems unnecessary to have an article about it, particularly one that still describes it as 'upcoming'. Though there are a few sources, I don't think this is considered notable under our guidelines. Robofish ( talk) 12:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to East Antarctica Ranges. MBisanz talk 17:26, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Totally arbitrary division. Why is 2000+ a notable division and not say, 3000, 4000 or any other x000 number? Why just those on the east, and not the west, which is currently redlinked? Also, there are lots of other, better organized and sourced lists of Antarctica's mountains. Prod declined for no reason. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 02:00, 2 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted WP:CSD#A7 by Jimfbleak ( talk). JohnCD ( talk) 12:56, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Article lacks reliable references and fails to meet notability guidelines for software. YuMa NuMa Contrib 11:51, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. There is a question here about notability but no general agreement. Some sources have been provided in the article, so I see no policy mandating deletion, and so this will default with the no consensus result. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD with Starred in two television series and recurred in three others. Biographical article about an actor. Six pages into a Google search I can't seem to find anything that would establish basic notability under WP:GNG, and also fails WP:ACTOR as far as I can tell. § FreeRangeFrog croak 02:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was KEEP - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq ( talk) 17:28, 22 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The article is about a community organization, which takes donations and promotes community forum. The google search result for JAINA gives
[6] only one result of community website of JAINA -
[7]. The article does pass
WP:ORG and should be deleted as per also speedy deletion criteria No, G11: Unambiguous advertising. As the article promotes non notable names of persons awarded by them. Besides organization - JAINA, asks for donations in its website link
[8] and therefore it seems it has been created for self-advertisement.
Jethwarp (
talk)
08:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:13, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This was speedied as the game is allegedly breaching the original rights but non of the content was a copyvio and that interpretation for a speedy didn't gain traction at the DRV discussion. Despite that, this is clearly something that is unsourced and doesn't, on the face of it, meet our inclusion criteria so I am listing this for discussion per the DRV. As I a procedural listing connected to the DRV close I make no personal recommendation. Spartaz Humbug! 08:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger One ping only 00:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This religion appears to be non-notable. I wasn't able to find any reliable sources online. The little green pig ( talk) 07:33, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
I'm just trying to introduce the subject. Perhaps it's not ready yet for wikipedia. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's not. The website for it has just started, there is no mention of it outside of online forums. I think it may be better to revisit this in a few years.
I understand if it must be deleted. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackspiritpubs ( talk • contribs) 07:48, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
I can't see any notability for the band, no major label, no hits, only an opening act for bigger groups. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Effects of cannabis. ( non-admin closure) TBr and ley ( what's up) 15:19, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Only cites 3 studies after 3 years as an article - questionable notability. petrarchan47 t c 07:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 04:14, 21 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Subject does not meet notability requirements and the BLP lacks references. YuMa NuMa Contrib 03:55, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Subject of the article lacks notability and article is not referenced with reliable independent sources. A quick Google search also fails to verify or find any of the aforementioned elements and confirm the existence of the film, hence it's clearly non-notable. Speedy delete if applicable. YuMa NuMa Contrib 02:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C) 00:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is basically genealogy-cruft, there is little here beyond genealogy, the only non-trivial mention of her seems to be in one historical novel, which does not confer notability. PatGallacher ( talk) 02:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. However I have no objection to userfying or incubating upon request. Salvidrim! ✉ 00:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is a tough one for me to call, because I do actually like some of the stuff these guys produce, but with a complete lack of any significant coverage in any reliable sources leads me to conclude that, aside from cursory mentions in the game articles, this group just isn't notable enough to have an article, and a redirect would be problematic. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:40, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This article provides no reliable sources on the subject, and I am unable to find any through Google Books, News, or Scholar, despite the claims the article makes for his importance. It's possible there's another, more common spelling of his name, but I can't find it, nor can I turn up any references to his organization "Human Rights International" (there's an Italian NGO by this name, but he doesn't seem to be a part of it), or his book of poems "Flames of Thoughts". (I don't speak Urdu, though, so my searches were limited to English-only.) So I thought I'd put this article up for AfD trial by fire; I'd be happy if somebody can turn up some sources and fill this one out, but I wasn't able to do it myself. Khazar2 ( talk) 19:27, 27 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C) 00:25, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable club - the claims to notability are weak (6th in the country but not by a credible organisation). No evidence that a notable competition has been held here. Biker Biker ( talk) 18:00, 27 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. KTC ( talk) 00:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:CORPDEPTH--does not have in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. There are sources but most are press releases, blogs, or passing mentions. A Google News search did not turn up much more. Promotional article by now-blocked editor. Logical Cowboy ( talk) 17:47, 26 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Consensus to keep following relisting The Bushranger One ping only 00:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Multiple recreations, by it's own admission it has a main purpose to promote small businesses, Maybe I'm off base here but I believe that this might warrant coverage under the main government page but think that it fails gng for a standalone article. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 00:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Comment - I have done major additions and improvement to the article. Jethwarp ( talk) 06:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 17:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is a new article where the notability of the subject may not meet Wikipedia's guidelines. On a News search on Google and Bing there are few hits, and the great majority of those are passing mentions. There are a huge number of references given in the article, but not much substance to many of them. I am not sure whether it should be deleted and am nominating it in order to get a consensus view. Please see the related article Matt Fellowes which comes from the same contributor and has the same issues. David_FLXD (Talk) 04:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC) David_FLXD (Talk) 04:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This is not a new article; HelloWallet has had a wikipedia page for the past 2+ years. The references in the article come from independent, reliable sources and directly relate to HelloWallet as a company. While I do have a COI, I am open about it and believe I have made responsible edits that are unbiased, factual, and informative. I requested help from editors in IRC groups and consequently edited the article accordingly. ElisabethLesser ( talk) 18:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This user David seems suspicious to me. This page has been up for 2.5 years. Why the issue now? And, why is he misrepresenting the facts? There are "64,100" links to this organization in Google, not a "few." And, it has been up for a long time with no objection. Why is he suggesting it has not been? This is suspicious. Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biography where you will find: "like a profile or curriculum vitae (résumé), a biography presents a subject's life story," This entry takes available data points and constructs a story, like hundreds of other company profiles. If David disagrees with that story, than he can suggest an alternative with other available data points. But, don't make up facts. That is suspicious. I see no reason for deletion. I just did a news search and see that this company is partially owned by Steve Case, and that it was just featured in the Wall Street Journal last Sunday. Although, I guess David's advice would be that biographers should ignore media coverage? I better tell my college history professor to change his curriculum. -- ConcernedReader2 ( talk) 05:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)— ConcernedReader2 ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Yes, you are right. It is 17 months and not 30 months. In any case, your argument is again suspicious. Notability is a subjective term, so it is in the eye of the beholder. But, when I think of lack of notability, I think of someone like you or me. I don't think of a company that seems to have been named by ABC News, one of the major US networks, as one of the 5 coolest US start-ups, or a company that seems to be frequently quoted in the top US papers in America. They also seem to have raised millions of dollars, including from one of America's most successful and wealthiest technology leaders, which by itself makes them one of the most notable US young companies. I also don't think of someone who seems to have won a Top 100 GameChanger from Huffington Post along with people like Steve Jobs, has testified in front of the U.S. Congress, and is cited by a US President and one of the most famous politicians in the 21st century. Seriously, you seem to have some kind of ulterior motive here. If you think that the facts have been misrepresented, edit them. But, don't make up facts to justify your points. It is highly suspicious. -- ConcernedReader2 ( talk) 20:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
All sources except (6) look like secondary in depth sources from reliable publishers. Sources (1) and (3) are of nationwide significance and you could argue that (4) and (5) are, too. There seem to multiple secondary reliable sources for this topic, which suggests that the topic is notable. The article could be made more neutral and the references list could be thinned to just the reliable sources, but these are matters of editing and don't suggest that deletion is needed here. Mark viking ( talk) 02:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Genesis Be fails WP:BIO; there is a lack of significant coverage from secondary reliable sources to assert her notability. The references present in the article are either blogs, dead links, or don't mention the subject at all. — ξ xplicit 01:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Pyrajenn: I've removed or replaced dead links or links that do not mention subject at all. I've also deleted statements that may be deemed subjective or promoting the subject rather than have a neutral tone. Please review again and offer any other corrections that may need to be done in order to make the page valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrajenn ( talk • contribs) 01:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect. Scottdale Inferno → Professional Inline Hockey Association#Teams, San Jose Pirates → American Inline Hockey League#Teams ( non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 ( talk) 21:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC) 21:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Short stubby article with no references that indicate notability
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Subject fails WP:NOTABILITY for WP:CORP. Has some links but trivial coverage or mentions fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Lacks "significant coverage in independent reliable sources" WP:GNG Hu12 ( talk) 04:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 21:37, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
no assertion of notability. needs sources as fails WP:GN / WP:ORG Widefox; talk 21:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Sunil Kumar Verma. MBisanz talk 17:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non- notable poem written by a scientist who, although marginally notable, is not noted as a poet. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 17:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Davis Langdon & Seah . MBisanz talk 17:33, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Run of the mill company and spamish. Also, Wikipedia is not a business directory. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 19:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non notable TV series - yet to screen. No independent sources in article and g search only shows press release type hits. NtheP ( talk) 19:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Independant of HGTV: ESPN episode preview: http://espn.go.com/blog/playbook/trending/post/_/id/12496/scoring-the-deal-finds-homes-for-athletes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiffany1gr ( talk • contribs) 21:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/realestate/all-eyes-on-the-ball-not-the-condos.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.200.224.201 ( talk) 17:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Scoring the Deal. The Bushranger One ping only 09:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable company which seems to be pinning notability on association with a new reality TV show (that hasn't yet) screened. Only references are not independent and there do not appear any reliable sources about the company. NtheP ( talk) 19:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Notable and reliable sources on The Abrams Team and its association with the reality show "Scoring the Deal" https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1g-WTa06xbcTDRsTms3aFp3QTg/edit http://therealdeal.com/blog/2013/01/02/celebrity-broker-discusses-sport-y-role-on-new-hgtv-show-video/ https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1g-WTa06xbcRUFabWNXZ3NhWDQ/edit http://news.yahoo.com/hgtvs-scoring-deal-cape-cods-priciest-properties-220000090.html http://therealdeal.com/blog/2013/01/02/celebrity-broker-discusses-sport-y-role-on-new-hgtv-show-video/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiffany1gr ( talk • contribs) 21:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/realestate/all-eyes-on-the-ball-not-the-condos.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.200.224.201 ( talk) 17:26, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Seems to fail WP:CORP. I can find no mention of this company in the usual places (Google News, Scholar, &c.), and the article itself makes no real claim to notability. Even the company's own web site has disappeared. Alexrexpvt ( talk) 17:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout ( T • C) 00:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NCONCERT, tours need to receive extensive coverage from 3rd party reliable sources. A long indiscriminate list of concert tour dates is not necessary or notable. Its not even navigationally accessible. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 17:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:11, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Appears to be a minor manufacturing company at most, with the usual handful of self-published press releases. Might be savable, but it's not making a good case for notability as yet. Andy Dingley ( talk) 11:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 17:59, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete - Does not meet Wikipedia:Notability (people) guidlines.Does not cite sufficient and verifiable references.-- Ntmg ( talk) 17:14, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Fijit Friends. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable toy. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 21:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Merge and redirect as above, not notable enough for own article. TheLongTone ( talk) 09:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Fijit Friends. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable toy. -- Alan Liefting ( talk - contribs) 21:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Nicolas Cage#Relationships and family. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The son of Nicholas Cage. Appeared in two films in extremely minor roles, and "co-created" (aka lent his name to) a comic book with his father (The Cages were neither the writers nor artists). He has also been arrested. Not notable, and mentions in news sources are just that- mentions. No significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 20:16, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Keep and protect stub during ongoing content/merge discussions j⚛e decker talk 18:52, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
This looks like a verbatim copy of somebody's thesis. It's impermissible original research. It may also be a neologism. NawlinWiki ( talk) 15:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Prabhat Ranjan Sarkar . MBisanz talk 17:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Seems to fail the GNG; lacking substantial coverage by independent sources. bobrayner ( talk) 15:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Acronym#Pseudo-acronyms. History retained so that someone can create a properly-sourced article out of this, because it's obviously a real concept, even if at the moment it's sources are dubious. Black Kite ( talk) 20:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The whole article stands on one single blog entry. Both WP:NEO and WP:N apply. There, I have an account ( talk) 15:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Not notable, no reliable or WP:verifiable sources. No GNews hits for either Mikindani Center of Hope or Hope Worldwide Kenya. 3 GBook hits, all sourced by Wikipedia (either Wikipedia Books LLC or VDM), no GHits of reliable sources. Article was tagged as dead end in 2010, no significant editing since. GregJackP Boomer! 01:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Article about an amateur race driver. Article states that he is a three times National Champion in hillclimbing in Bosnia and Herzegovina in his category of cars. This is sourced with an article in a local newspaper Google tranlation from Croatian. Following WP:NMOTORSPORT he is not notable, as he is an amateur. Is being a National Champion in a category of a niche sport (hillclimbing) enough for WP:NSPORTS? Researches don't give him enough hits for meeting GNG. This is a Wiedergänger, deleted per CSD in November. Ben Ben ( talk) 01:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to The E.N.D. The Bushranger One ping only 09:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Non-notable album release by The Black Eyed Peas. WP:HAMMER... very little information beyond a track listing. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 01:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 09:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete Non-notable type of dog; the only secondary references I could find are in this gigantic list of mutt portmanteaus and a brief entry in this book. Google Scholar doesn't turn up any results. Most of the google results are directly related to Bullnese breeders or are on sites that probably scraped the name from Wikipedia. TKK bark ! 19:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to R. Stevie Moore discography. ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable musical recording. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS. Mediran ( t • c) 09:46, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to The Beginning (The Black Eyed Peas album). ( non-admin closure) Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 00:54, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NSONGS, notability aside, songs should only be given their own article where significant independent coverage is given from reliable sources. This has not received extensive coverage and the subject of it being released as part of an iTunes countdown is already covered on the album's page — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 01:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
All the information contained in these type of lists seems to fall under WP:IINFO. When the song entered the top 10, when it peaked, the number of weeks in the top 10 all seem extraneous. A previous discussion resulted in no consensus. There is List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2011 (Korea) and the like as well, but there is both significance for and much more interest in songs which reached number one and coverage beyond the chart provider is not difficult to find. A top 10 seems a bit more arbritary (it could be top 20, top 40, or why not the entire hot 100). Lists of number twos have been deleted in the past, so why do we need entire top 10s. This also isn't even the main national chart in Korea, so this sets up top 10 for any and all published charts. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 00:29, 29 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:02, 28 January 2013 (UTC) reply
There aren't any reliable sources listed in the article, and I can't find any online, so I don't think the subject passes WP:CORP. — Mr. Stradivarius ( have a chat) 16:50, 26 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Devorah Rose. MBisanz talk 17:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Article was speedy deleted under WP:CSD#G11 (unambiguous promotion) then immediately recreated by the author as less promotional. The concern here is that while it contains assertions of significance, the three sources given do not suggest significant coverage; one is from the magazine itself and the others appear to have no relation to the subject. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 05:33, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Esben and the Witch (band). Tone 18:05, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Article about a single from a notable record, released by a notable band. I quote the author of the article: This song did not chart.. The one included reference is a secondary quote of a review of the band, not the single itself. Fails WP:NSONGS. I am also nominating two other articles about singles off the same EP, which suffer from the same issue:
§ FreeRangeFrog croak 18:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There were two who argued for a keep, but consensus is fairly clear the events here are news stories lacking encyclopedic significance. (While murders are the most serious of crimes, they do not in general merit separate articles, nor do they lend notability to the location where they occur.) There are also claims that "Murder Kroger" is a common (probably slang) nickname for the location, but the claim has not been backed up by reliable sourcing. Sjakkalle (Check!) 17:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The sources are either unreliable (personal websites, YouTube, Facebook, MySpace), don't mention the Kroger (the book), don't use the term "Murder Kroger" (the AJC article), or are otherwise unreliable (Yelp). The only source that looks decent is this one. Everything else is just spam, personal websites, OR, and fancruft. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 07:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Delete (without prejudice to the inclusion of information like this into Manitoba general election, 1903, as that information already apparently exists at Prohibition in Canada) j⚛e decker talk 19:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Removed PROD per WP:PROD (Previous AfD exists). Rationale in PROD was: None of these candidates have articles, the 'party' has no article, none of them were elected. I can find no coverage in sources, and no indication that this topic meets the notability criteria for inclusion Illia Connell ( talk) 07:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Charles Seymour, 2nd Baron Seymour of Trowbridge. MBisanz talk 17:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Delete: Complete lack of any notability.
Quis separabit?
18:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
reply
Comment There is a Frances Seymour (disambiguation) page, which should be at the primary if this article is deleted (and should be at the primary either way). Boleyn ( talk) 06:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 19:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Nominate for deletion Has been tagged as of doubtful notability for 6 years. Creator's response (see Talk:Sarkis Antikajian) doesn't convince me of notability. Tagged for speedy deletion in 2007 Boleyn ( talk) 18:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:39, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Nominate for deletion Received no consensus in 2007 AfD. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Has been tagged as of doubtful notability for 6 years. Boleyn ( talk) 18:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
A quick Google search in News (inc. archive), Books, and generally brings up absolutely nothing to show notability for this British fashion designer. One local news article here and stuff about charity work, but otherwise, nothing - and with a name so distinctive, any existing reliable sources you'd think would be easier to find. Refs in article are the Kent local news article, a BBC photo, and a dead link. Mabalu ( talk) 19:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Tone 18:06, 25 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Unexplained PROD removal. It's a small free once a month newspaper that caters to Hampton Roads which includes Virginia Beach, the remaining six incorporated towns average a population of around 1,000 people. According to List of newspapers serving cities over 100,000 in the United States#Hampton Roads.2C Virginia there are a couple much larger newspapers in the area. As such, does not seem to satisfy WP:CORP/ WP:ORG. Mkdw talk 21:21, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 00:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply
Previous AfD lacked participation and not very compelling. I see no indication of notability. JayJay What did I do? 23:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply