< 30 January | 1 February > |
---|
The result was Speedy keep, nomination was made by sock of banned user. Finlay McWalter • Talk 15:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Speedy Close - bad faith nomination.-- blue 520 15:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Per WP:BLP1E and WP:PERPETRATOR, this is not a notable killer. His co-accused's article is already at AfD. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
An unreleased album that isn't reliably sourced for a release date, track list. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. List of "confirmed" tracks is unsourced. List of "possible" tracks (which is longer) is unsourced. The only thing reliably sourced, by a single source, is the title. As such, if fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:CRYSTAL. Runs afoul of WP:HAMMER too. Niteshift36 ( talk) 22:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus (default keep). Non-admin closure. Swarm( Talk) 22:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Once-sentence, unnotable, no refrences, an orphan. Belugaboy535136 contribs 22:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep plenty of secondary reviews ( WP:NACD) CTJF83 chat 19:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC) reply
non-notable album; unencyclopaedic Rapido ( talk) 22:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. although this should not prevent a later redirect if a conensus for such later emerges on the talk page Scott Mac (Doc) 21:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The reason for this AFD discussion is because a few editors redirect the page claiming it is not notable. The relevant notabilty is found in WP:NSONG, this song has charted in the Official UK charts. SunCreator ( talk) 21:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment It seems after research that there is some info for the background of the article. I will try to add them and let's see. Also, I forgot that the song is extensively being performed at The Monster Ball Tour. Hence it does pass WP:NSONGS. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete both per WP:SNOW. Both articles salted. – MuZemike 01:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This page has been A7'd twice in the past three days. Now it appears to claim he was in Harry Potter, although there's no entry for this individual on IMDB. Also a COI. Shadowjams ( talk) 21:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I can find no reliable sources to establish the notability of this web series. Sarilox ( talk) 20:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Written like a resumé and unsourced, tagged since 2008/2007 Pevos ( talk) 20:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per G12 by Nyttend. MrKIA11 ( talk) 18:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Despite everything that he has done in his life, I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill ( talk) 20:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable list Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn. I didn't notice that there was already an AfD and that notability was shown in it. I'll add the links from the previous AfD to the article. Joe Chill ( talk) 20:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
All that I can find in Google is Youtube, Answers.com, music sites that are just profiles or trivial mentions of his such as CD Universe and Emusic, and lyrics. All that I can find in Google News is lots of Magnum Photos results which is a site for photography. This paragraph that I found in Google Books shows that he might be notable. Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill ( talk) 20:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 17:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable software. No coverage in reliable independent sources that I can see. Some IPs are edit warring over it, so I assume a WP:PROD would be contested. Pcap ping 20:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Autobiography of a young associate producer of some TV episodes for whom I can find no coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. (There was another Joseph Peicott, killed near Boston in 1993 in a traffic accident.) He does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE or any other aspect of WP:BIO. Glenfarclas ( talk) 19:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 00:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a how-to guide I42 ( talk) 19:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy redirect. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Content merged into Tigran Mansurian; list of works was a complete duplicate anyway, so there was not much to merge. Classical geographer ( talk) 19:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a list of characters for a video game of marginal notability, itself at AfD. Contested prod, with argument normal accepted type of article; better than individual articles of characters, hardly an "uncontroversial deletion". Pcap ping 19:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Unresolved issue of whether the sources qualify as reliable. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Unreferenced article about a manga with no assertion of notability. Fails WP:BK. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 18:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Commment A 15 vols-ongoing series published by Akita Shoten( [12]). No licensor outside Japan. Absent not only from Anime News Network database but also from the reported news, meaning not a single volume of this series made it into the Japanese manga charts. -- KrebMarkt 18:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Almost no content iBen talk/ contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 18:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Article is mostly nonsense not backed up by the sources given. It is true that the A14(M) is an unsigned motorway, however it is actually a short section a mile long, commonly considered to be part of the A1(M). It is only referred to on paper.
I attempted to redirect this to the A14 article but the user has just undone the action. The section about the planned upgrade is true, but given that it was only on the cards for 3 years and never really got far in the planning process, certainly doesn't give it notability. Jeni ( talk) 18:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The subject of this article has requested its deletion at OTRS ticket#2010013110017466. I tend to support the deletion; he does not appear to meet WP:BIO from what I can see. Stifle ( talk) 17:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was THIS IS A TITLE. JForget 02:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable software. Very marginal coverage in reliable independent sources. Pcap ping 17:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn by nominator. ... discospinster talk 03:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This page should either be renamed Lists of documentary films or just deleted, it seems to me. Or is this valid as a redirect? The only content are three links that could easily be added to the See also section of
Documentary film.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
16:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC) WITHDRAWN per below
reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
If the company is tethering on the verge of non-notability (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artix Entertainment (4th nomination)), then their site that holds their more obscure games surely is even less notable. Pcap ping 16:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Scott Mac (Doc) 21:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Only reviewed on seemingly obscure sites. See
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artix Entertainment (4th nomination).
Pcap
ping
16:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC) (I think the sources found below are adequate. 01:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC))
reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Seems to be a non-notable field, sources mention it tangentially; a few famous people appear to have visited it, but I'm not sure that confers notability in the sense that we require it. Do we have any relevant guidelines here? Anyway, opening to the community for insight and opinions. Glass Cobra 16:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
-->
The result was delete. JForget 02:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Article is an unreferenced assertion of a genre founded on one track on an album by a defunct band. There is no Wikipedia page for the band or the album. No genre references on AllAboutJazz; only reference on Allmusic is the album track title itself. AllyD ( talk) 15:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Note: Notified WikiProject Jazz. AllyD ( talk) 16:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC)# reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Two-line biographical article about a chartered accountant and former town councillor. Sporadically mentioned and quoted in local media, but nothing approaching siginficant coverage. Subject fails WP:POLITICIAN. --Rrburke ekrubrR 15:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Flunks WP:N and WP:SPAM; no reliable sources; self-promotional. (While self-promotion is not a reason for deletion, the article's other failings are.) THF ( talk) 15:11, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The fact that Stonemason nominated me for deletion should be wiped out because I changed some of his edits on the All-White Basketball league. I think that the deletion should be held off for 6 months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plaintalk2010 ( talk • contribs) 03:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC) What spam are you talking about. At the very least some promotional items have been removed personally. I just think it's shady that the guy that I'm involved in an edit war with is the guy who nominates this page for deletion. Now that's a conflict of interest. The deletion process is too subjective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plaintalk2010 ( talk • contribs) 03:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
— C.Fred ( talk) 14:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. nominator also changed to keep JForget 00:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
A search for reference, found little to no support for any of the content of this article. Yes there Ancient Arabic units of measurement, but for most of the units mentioned here no references are found. See example reference in article, what is found has no support for the measurements as documented. The farsakh is the only thing I find close and even that does not match references. Removal on non-referenced content per WP:V would result in a article that no longer meets the expectations of the title. Prod was removed so bringing to AfD Jeepday ( talk) 15:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment. {{trout}} I don't understand why people here are voting for deletion of an article based on speculations that the content may be incorrect, after someone has found a Springer book that backs up the content. Hans Adler 01:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable official of political parties who has not stood for elected office himself. No reliable sources found and indeed there appear only to be passing mentions in a tiny number of newspaper articles. Has been tagged for notability for 18 months or so. Sam Blacketer ( talk) 14:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD (by blanking). PROD concern "No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources" blue 520 14:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
*Delete and do not wish to see
Internet car buying in India,
Interent car buying in Chile or
Internet car buying in the Sahara Desert any time soon. From an encyclopedia's position, we just don't need articles of this nature.--TrustMe
THROW! 20:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)) User has been blocked, refer to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.
Ottawa4ever (
talk)
08:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep ( WP:NACD) CTJF83 chat 19:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable BLP of a linguist. The only independent source isn't even about HIM, it's about Greenberg, and only mentions Croft as it relates to Greenberg. That doesn't satisfy the "non-trivial" aspect of our notability policy. The other source is simply a university profile. Unit Anode 14:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
All that I can find in Google is unreliable sites, a profile, and a trivial mention in The Walkley Magazine. All that I can find in Google News is a few news articles by him. I found zero sources in Google Books. Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill ( talk) 13:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Wow. A deletionist. I love you guys. All I can offer is that he's on TV in Australia every night on an evening news program on SBS which broadcasts nationally, which of course doesn't leave a textual trace on the web because he's a broadcast TV reporter. Why not enjoy yourself and go ahead and delete it. Timbomb ( talk) 23:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
All that I can find in Google is 123people.com, monkees101.com which only has one sentence, sites to buy his books, profiles, unreliable sites, and Open Library. All that I can find in Google News is three trivial mentions in a local newspaper. All that I can find in Google Books is books by him. Fails WP:CREATIVE. Joe Chill ( talk) 13:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that there because the only sources that exist that cover this man are of his crimes, the article fails WP:BLP1E. NW ( Talk) 12:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I know the definition of "BLP1E" is disputed, but I believe this article in it's current form does fall under the term. The article covers nothing on this man other than one part of his life, how he got jailed for being a pedophile. — Coffee // have a cup // ark // 10:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep-The article is sourced and is indeed notable in that the guy was found guilty of 189 counts of indecent assault and sentenced to only 4 years. For WP:ONEEVENT, are you referring to the sentencing, or to the period during which he was assaulting these children?...there appears to be some lexical ambiguity in your statement. The article does need a bit work, but as it stands, it need not be nominated for deletion. Smallman12q ( talk) 13:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. This is a non-notable and unsourced WP:BLP article. I searched Google News Archive and found 1 relevant match, which was a passing one-liner mention from activeanime.com. That's it. JBsupreme ( talk) 08:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
There does not appear to be enough substance here to support a biographical article. He made the news only within the last few days because of his killing. However, there has been been no biographical coverage of this individual prior to this single event, and he was even described as a " little-known 47-year-old journalist who specialized in writing about economics" in one of the recent news articles about his death. Wikipedia:Notability says "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute sufficient evidence of notability." Dominic· t 08:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Essentially this is a WP:FRINGE/ WP:FORK for Cornish nationalism (created by somebody of that political persuasion). No evidence that such an article is WP:Notable and its contents consists of WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. Nor is there any evidence that people from one county in England have especially high numbers of people in America, as to be worthy of an article. No other Encyclopedia in the world includes such an article. Delete as FORK political activism on the part of Joowww. - Yorkshirian ( talk) 07:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Fan club with 60 members and no evidence of notability. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 06:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Made-up word, obvious vehicle for WP:ARTSPAM of the company "Viscendo LLC," founded by Jody Basye. Borders (closely) on db-g11 as blatant advertising. User:Jodybasye contested my PROD. Glenfarclas ( talk) 06:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I deprodded this video game after I found one relatively short review on about.com I felt it deserves a discussion. (Besides, I see it has been brought to AfD before, so a prod was procedurally invalid.) Pcap ping 06:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Article is of unverifiable nature, based on unreliable conjecture citing no sources, though a Google search results in unreliable sources using the possible-hoax name "Pink Crust". Possible disparagement toward artist. Correct, updated, and verified information on the fourth studio album can be found on the Avril Lavigne article. Kerαunoςcopia◁ galaxies 06:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable video game. Arguably its notability should be discussed here, rather than edit warred over the redirect to the company, which itself may be deleted soon. Pcap ping 05:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This squadron, performing a ground combat service support function, is not notable. Any relevant material can either be placed at Shaw Air Force Base or 20th Fighter Wing. This nomination is in line with previously determined community consensus over separate non-combat ground forces' companies (a unit at the same level). See eg Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/101st Chemical Company (United States) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/722nd Ordnance Company (United States). Buckshot06 (talk) 05:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable building, no evidence of notability for design or history. Acroterion (talk) 03:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Zaroo independent sources for this, hic. Pcap ping 03:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Improperly "citing" a single album as evidence for a genre's existence does not a legitimate genre make. C1k3 ( talk) 02:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge and redirect. Jayjg (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This is an EP by Stefani Germanotta, recorded a couple years before she found fame (pardon the pun) as Lady Gaga. The EP was apparently not released—the article claims a "handful of copies were sold at New York area shows"—and the only mentions I'm seeing for this are in fansites/forums, torrent links, etc. I can not find significant coverage in independent reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow Talk 02:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This article has been tagged as needing sources for a long time and none have been presented even after extensive editing. Miami33139 ( talk) 02:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. Well, at least I've heard of this one, it has that going for it. I searched Google News Archives and Google Books, with no success at finding substantial coverage from reliable third party publications. I tried queries "Enhanced Programmable ircII Client" and "EPIC +IRC". JBsupreme ( talk) 02:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep Passes WP:Prof ( WP:NACD) CTJF83 chat 20:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Typical academic CV - written articles, edited and contributed to multi-author books. Doesn'tseem particularly notable. Scott Mac (Doc) 01:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Jeff Chapman (Georgia politician). Cirt ( talk) 20:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
A waste disposal company. Having a notable founder does not make a company notable. The only external links were spam for the founder, not the company. Sgroupace ( talk) 18:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. nomination withdrawl - oops JForget 00:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The subject does not meet the notability criteria for a musician ( WP:MUSN. The article was written by the subject, and none of the references/external links meet the requirements for a reliable source WP:RS. The subject is also not notable as a software developer or entrepreneur WP:N.
I am not a New Yorker or a music aficionado, So I do not know how unusual it is for a child to appear at Carnegie Hall to perform his own work with a professional orchestra. It does not match the WP:MUSN criteria, but if we can find reliable sources that assert that this is unusual and that cite this particular performance, then we can establish notability. If someone can chime in and say "no, this happens a lot," then it's not notable.While looking for sources, also check "Gregori" in addition to "Gregory."
Arch dude ( talk) 16:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
It hardly ever happens that a child appears at Carnegie hall and performs his work with a professional orchestra. Magarshak was the youngest person to do this as far as I know, the youngest pianist to perform on that level. You can ascertain the notability at http://magarshak.com/piano where several TV programs and magazines are referenced. For example, in the article from "Daily News Magazine", "the youngest person ever to enter Juilliard on a scholarship". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.143.76.29 ( talk) 01:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Cite and Keep: I, the original deletion nominator, am changing my implicit !vote from "delete" to "keep", assuming that the outcome of the referencing effort is positive. See my talk page for details. If there is a process for withdrawing an AfD nomination, then we should do that. I would still appreciate another opinion: I almost never participate in AfD and I may not be doing this right. Basically we still have a COI newbie, but I intend to mitigate this by monitoring the article. - Arch dude ( talk) 23:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Formerly unreferenced BLP for which references are thin on the ground.
Does not seem to be generally notable; news mentions seem to be mainly passing references rather than in-depth coverage (VP sells stock! Hold the front page!) and most of the information in here is completely uncited. pablo hablo. 10:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:PORNBIO.
Epbr123 (
talk) 00:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
*Delete The article says Russell is circumcised and reportedly has a 7-inch penis.. Need I say more about the encylcopedic value (or lack thereof) of the article?--
Prodigy96 (
talk) 07:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC) User has been blocked, refer to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.
Ottawa4ever (
talk)
08:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
reply
*Keep because he won the mentioned 1995 award, which does help to establish some notability for inclusion.--TrustMe
THROW! 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) User has been blocked, refer to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.
Ottawa4ever (
talk)
08:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 ( talk) 00:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 ( talk) 00:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus. Beeblebrox ( talk) 03:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
A whopping total of 26 Google hits for this name. 161 for just " Gulzar Saifi", which is a redirect to this page. Other than that redirect, only two real Wiki pages actually link here--one for the film The Final Inch and one for the director of the film. Clearly not notable as an individual, although the film (of which he is reportedly the protagonist) certainly is. Most of this "biography" is actually information about the film. I recommend copying the small amount of biographical information from Mohammad Gulzar Saifi into the article The Final Inch and deleting with or without redirect. (A note: The user who started this article is currently unable to participate in this discussion due to the terms of an ArbCom decision. If it is felt that my nomination of the article at this time is inappropriate, please postpone it until he is able to contribute directly to the conversation.) Bueller 007 ( talk) 08:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 18:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Reference review:
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill ( talk) 18:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
He seems to be a marginally notable academic. The article has been subjected to edit warring ranging from attempts to stub it to one sentence to adding silly puffery. I'm nominating it in the hope that the claim(s) for notability will become apparent. Pcap ping 05:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) Tim Song ( talk) 02:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Hello there, Don the Sockpuppet made this nomination because no references exist for the article and it is written like a advertisement. Five Ton Sockpuppet ( talk) 00:46, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted, per WP:CSD #7 "No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content)." - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 10:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. No reliable sources to verify notability. Ricky81682 ( talk) 04:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This article does not meet the notability guidelines for Wikipedia. Much effort has been made on the part of Phantomsteve to research notability, but none was found. The creator and main editor, Stripedfox, has admitted to COI. See the talk page for a detailed discussion between Stripedfox and Phantomsteve. I had previously proposed this for deletion, but since it was controversial, the PROD was removed, therefore I am now nominating through this method. Joshua Scott ( talk) 02:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
I wanted to ask all of you several questions about this article and about Wikipedia guidelines. As I understand, the main argument was that all of the publications I signed were promotional and ATN maybe have payed money for the material about their company. And for example "The New York Times" is more trusted and respected magazine. But, as I know, publishing in "The New York Times" also costs money. Two years ago to place the article to the first page of this magazine was nearly 2000$. Now, I think, it is much more expensive. So, the first question is, do you consider that only that magazines which take more money for the place on their pages than the rest are more trusted than others?
As for the next question, I have already written about this some time ago and I want to repeat this again. This company does not produce products of daily use, but it offers equipment for Army, Law Enforcement, Police, hunting, hiking etc. So, I think that this branch is enough important for the general Encyclopedia like this one.
And as for the night vision and thermal night vision, do you really think that these inventions are not enough important for the world? And ATN were the fist who has developed some technologies for this branch, that many other companies now use (It is in my article).
Also I wanted to ask you to be so kind and list that magazines, publications and Award nominations that can be verified specifically for this industry. And I ask you not to write platitudes but to list concrete publications, which can really be interested to write an article about this company сonsidering it's specificity without money and which are really enough trusted for Wikipedia. Because I think that if there is no enough trusted sources for this concrete theme, it does not mean that this information is not interesting for Encyclopedia, that only means that there is info that is not enough developed in magazines, but despite that it still has it's informational value.
And for the last one, I give you the
link to the list of magazines and PDF files of the publications about this company. This list is constantly updated and I hope that you will find respected in this area magazines there that will be enough trusted for Wiki.
And I also wanted to recall that in other Encyclopedias only subject specialists approve articles, so if you are Language Specialist you should correct and approve only text, but not the informational content I think. And to approve or deny the article I will kindly ask you to consult with specialists in this concrete theme. That is all, I hope you will review your opinion after consulting with specialists about this theme and I will wait for your decision.
Stripedfox |
Talk
10:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Procedural - I declined a PROD on this one, since Gscholar turned up decent citation counts. I know nothing about archaeology and read no Hungarian however, so I refer here for further discussion Ray Talk 00:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
I do not agree with the deletion. Notability and fame are not the same. His notability is supported by the above-written references. Earning fame in geoarcheology as in many other auxiliary sciences of archaeology or historiograpy (heraldics, faleristics, sfragistics) is practically impossible unless someone starts a National Geography TV carrier on some popular issue such as "How to dig out the Holy Grail?" My personal opinion is that we can find easier notable historians among 'unknown' researchers than among famous essayists compiling 1000 page best-sllers by up-grading commonplaces on popular issues. Rokarudi--Rokarudi 17:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Does not meet notability guidelines. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources (references provided are either primary ones, blogs or trivial). No indication of awards, charted singles or albums or anything else that might help meet notability guidelines. Not on a notable label either. RadioFan ( talk) 23:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
http://www.pegasusnews.com/news/2008/dec/13/live-review-one-lone-car-radiant-and-calhoun-lolas/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bball606 ( talk • contribs) 19:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 00:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable proprietary career college with no significant third-party references. Reads like an ad, author is apparently a single purpose account. Searching Fremont College on google returns three related hits: this article, and two links to their website, google news comes back with absolutely nothing.
Accredited or not, as a for-profit institution, Fremont should be held to the same notability standards as a business, and in that regard, it fails miserably. 2 says you, says two 23:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Not to be confused with any other person of the same name, the subjec of this minimally referenced biography is a TV presenter on QVC. The article is essentially a paraphrase of the QVC page on her. Press reporting seems largely limited to passing mentions and a stalking case some years back. No doubt well-known thanks to her work, but not necessarily "notable" in the WP:N Wikipedia sense. Not much here here really. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable website, article written by single-purpose user who is a co-founder of the company. There is some coverage here, but beyond that I have been unable to find any significant third-party coverage from reliable sources. Haakon ( talk) 21:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your review, i understand the feedback and can provide significantly more links to articles written about Search3 from many sites, will that help? I can't do much about the WP:SPA if other independent people edit the document does that remove this concern? I also see many sites like ours within Wikipedia so would love your assistance to make this page more appropriate, can you help edit it?--
Cdclayton (
talk)
20:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. The IP user who was the person who actually wanted deletion did not come participate in the discussion, the formal nominator had no !vote, and nobody else has participated. With nobody actively calling for deletion, the most appropriate way to close is as keep, without prejudice to renomination if someone is actively willing to argue for deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Creating this debate page on behalf of [ 86.40.214.5] who did not complete all steps for AfD. Reason given was: "Notability is not inherited, this is a biography with no independent multiple reliable sources, graduating, having children and being married for 25 years is not notable" DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 16:33, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Autobiography of unremarkable wrestler. Fails WP:GNG. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 10:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge relevant content to Van Tuong Nguyen. Beeblebrox ( talk) 04:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Darshan Singh is only mentioned in primary sources, namely news sources, and only respect to a single event, namely the execution of Van Tuong Nguyen. He does not meet the general notability standard, nor the specific one for people, because of lack of coverage in secondary sources. See also People notable only for one event. Request Deletion Bejnar ( talk) 06:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 00:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is unreferenced, and because of the nebulous subject matter, I see no way to reference it. Even if we verify the events described, we cannot easily verify that the culturual significance is anything other than the article author's opinion. Chutznik ( talk) 06:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 00:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable corporation, lacks external refs, is a small startup that never actually sold a product and was consumed by another company. MBisanz talk 05:59, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 00:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Considering the only source is an op-ed piece in a newspaper and the books don't appear to be notable on their own (the first is ranked 873,000th on WP), I believe he fails our notability guidelines. MBisanz talk 05:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Self-published book with no evidence of notability. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 04:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Article describes thing which no longer exists RawrMage ( talk) 19:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable role-playing game, with no coverage in reliable sources. TN X Man 21:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Manga BoyZ is not a Manga but Role-playing_game ! Le Grimoire is a publisher in France since 1992. Manga BoyZ is one of the universe published by the editor. Four books are available. Reliable sources can be found. -- Ellwen ( talk) 19:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. JForget 00:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill ( talk) 02:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill ( talk) 01:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 21:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Does not meet any of the criteria of WP:CREATIVE. May also fail WP:PROMO Wikipeterproject ( talk) 00:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Does not meet the criteria of WP:CREATIVE Wikipeterproject ( talk) 00:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
< 30 January | 1 February > |
---|
The result was Speedy keep, nomination was made by sock of banned user. Finlay McWalter • Talk 15:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Speedy Close - bad faith nomination.-- blue 520 15:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Per WP:BLP1E and WP:PERPETRATOR, this is not a notable killer. His co-accused's article is already at AfD. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 23:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
An unreleased album that isn't reliably sourced for a release date, track list. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. List of "confirmed" tracks is unsourced. List of "possible" tracks (which is longer) is unsourced. The only thing reliably sourced, by a single source, is the title. As such, if fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:CRYSTAL. Runs afoul of WP:HAMMER too. Niteshift36 ( talk) 22:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus (default keep). Non-admin closure. Swarm( Talk) 22:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Once-sentence, unnotable, no refrences, an orphan. Belugaboy535136 contribs 22:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep plenty of secondary reviews ( WP:NACD) CTJF83 chat 19:32, 6 February 2010 (UTC) reply
non-notable album; unencyclopaedic Rapido ( talk) 22:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. although this should not prevent a later redirect if a conensus for such later emerges on the talk page Scott Mac (Doc) 21:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The reason for this AFD discussion is because a few editors redirect the page claiming it is not notable. The relevant notabilty is found in WP:NSONG, this song has charted in the Official UK charts. SunCreator ( talk) 21:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment It seems after research that there is some info for the background of the article. I will try to add them and let's see. Also, I forgot that the song is extensively being performed at The Monster Ball Tour. Hence it does pass WP:NSONGS. --Legolas (talk2me) 04:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete both per WP:SNOW. Both articles salted. – MuZemike 01:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This page has been A7'd twice in the past three days. Now it appears to claim he was in Harry Potter, although there's no entry for this individual on IMDB. Also a COI. Shadowjams ( talk) 21:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I can find no reliable sources to establish the notability of this web series. Sarilox ( talk) 20:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Written like a resumé and unsourced, tagged since 2008/2007 Pevos ( talk) 20:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per G12 by Nyttend. MrKIA11 ( talk) 18:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Despite everything that he has done in his life, I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill ( talk) 20:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable list Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Withdrawn. I didn't notice that there was already an AfD and that notability was shown in it. I'll add the links from the previous AfD to the article. Joe Chill ( talk) 20:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
All that I can find in Google is Youtube, Answers.com, music sites that are just profiles or trivial mentions of his such as CD Universe and Emusic, and lyrics. All that I can find in Google News is lots of Magnum Photos results which is a site for photography. This paragraph that I found in Google Books shows that he might be notable. Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill ( talk) 20:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 17:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable software. No coverage in reliable independent sources that I can see. Some IPs are edit warring over it, so I assume a WP:PROD would be contested. Pcap ping 20:10, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Autobiography of a young associate producer of some TV episodes for whom I can find no coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. (There was another Joseph Peicott, killed near Boston in 1993 in a traffic accident.) He does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE or any other aspect of WP:BIO. Glenfarclas ( talk) 19:50, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 00:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a how-to guide I42 ( talk) 19:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy redirect. — David Eppstein ( talk) 21:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Content merged into Tigran Mansurian; list of works was a complete duplicate anyway, so there was not much to merge. Classical geographer ( talk) 19:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This is a list of characters for a video game of marginal notability, itself at AfD. Contested prod, with argument normal accepted type of article; better than individual articles of characters, hardly an "uncontroversial deletion". Pcap ping 19:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Unresolved issue of whether the sources qualify as reliable. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Unreferenced article about a manga with no assertion of notability. Fails WP:BK. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 18:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Commment A 15 vols-ongoing series published by Akita Shoten( [12]). No licensor outside Japan. Absent not only from Anime News Network database but also from the reported news, meaning not a single volume of this series made it into the Japanese manga charts. -- KrebMarkt 18:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Almost no content iBen talk/ contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 18:56, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Article is mostly nonsense not backed up by the sources given. It is true that the A14(M) is an unsigned motorway, however it is actually a short section a mile long, commonly considered to be part of the A1(M). It is only referred to on paper.
I attempted to redirect this to the A14 article but the user has just undone the action. The section about the planned upgrade is true, but given that it was only on the cards for 3 years and never really got far in the planning process, certainly doesn't give it notability. Jeni ( talk) 18:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The subject of this article has requested its deletion at OTRS ticket#2010013110017466. I tend to support the deletion; he does not appear to meet WP:BIO from what I can see. Stifle ( talk) 17:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was THIS IS A TITLE. JForget 02:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable software. Very marginal coverage in reliable independent sources. Pcap ping 17:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn by nominator. ... discospinster talk 03:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This page should either be renamed Lists of documentary films or just deleted, it seems to me. Or is this valid as a redirect? The only content are three links that could easily be added to the See also section of
Documentary film.
Shawn in Montreal (
talk)
16:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC) WITHDRAWN per below
reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
If the company is tethering on the verge of non-notability (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artix Entertainment (4th nomination)), then their site that holds their more obscure games surely is even less notable. Pcap ping 16:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Scott Mac (Doc) 21:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Only reviewed on seemingly obscure sites. See
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artix Entertainment (4th nomination).
Pcap
ping
16:44, 31 January 2010 (UTC) (I think the sources found below are adequate. 01:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC))
reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Seems to be a non-notable field, sources mention it tangentially; a few famous people appear to have visited it, but I'm not sure that confers notability in the sense that we require it. Do we have any relevant guidelines here? Anyway, opening to the community for insight and opinions. Glass Cobra 16:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
-->
The result was delete. JForget 02:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod. Article is an unreferenced assertion of a genre founded on one track on an album by a defunct band. There is no Wikipedia page for the band or the album. No genre references on AllAboutJazz; only reference on Allmusic is the album track title itself. AllyD ( talk) 15:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Note: Notified WikiProject Jazz. AllyD ( talk) 16:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC)# reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Two-line biographical article about a chartered accountant and former town councillor. Sporadically mentioned and quoted in local media, but nothing approaching siginficant coverage. Subject fails WP:POLITICIAN. --Rrburke ekrubrR 15:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Flunks WP:N and WP:SPAM; no reliable sources; self-promotional. (While self-promotion is not a reason for deletion, the article's other failings are.) THF ( talk) 15:11, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The fact that Stonemason nominated me for deletion should be wiped out because I changed some of his edits on the All-White Basketball league. I think that the deletion should be held off for 6 months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plaintalk2010 ( talk • contribs) 03:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC) What spam are you talking about. At the very least some promotional items have been removed personally. I just think it's shady that the guy that I'm involved in an edit war with is the guy who nominates this page for deletion. Now that's a conflict of interest. The deletion process is too subjective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plaintalk2010 ( talk • contribs) 03:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
— C.Fred ( talk) 14:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. nominator also changed to keep JForget 00:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
A search for reference, found little to no support for any of the content of this article. Yes there Ancient Arabic units of measurement, but for most of the units mentioned here no references are found. See example reference in article, what is found has no support for the measurements as documented. The farsakh is the only thing I find close and even that does not match references. Removal on non-referenced content per WP:V would result in a article that no longer meets the expectations of the title. Prod was removed so bringing to AfD Jeepday ( talk) 15:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment. {{trout}} I don't understand why people here are voting for deletion of an article based on speculations that the content may be incorrect, after someone has found a Springer book that backs up the content. Hans Adler 01:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable official of political parties who has not stood for elected office himself. No reliable sources found and indeed there appear only to be passing mentions in a tiny number of newspaper articles. Has been tagged for notability for 18 months or so. Sam Blacketer ( talk) 14:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD (by blanking). PROD concern "No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources" blue 520 14:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
*Delete and do not wish to see
Internet car buying in India,
Interent car buying in Chile or
Internet car buying in the Sahara Desert any time soon. From an encyclopedia's position, we just don't need articles of this nature.--TrustMe
THROW! 20:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)) User has been blocked, refer to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.
Ottawa4ever (
talk)
08:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep ( WP:NACD) CTJF83 chat 19:45, 6 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable BLP of a linguist. The only independent source isn't even about HIM, it's about Greenberg, and only mentions Croft as it relates to Greenberg. That doesn't satisfy the "non-trivial" aspect of our notability policy. The other source is simply a university profile. Unit Anode 14:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
All that I can find in Google is unreliable sites, a profile, and a trivial mention in The Walkley Magazine. All that I can find in Google News is a few news articles by him. I found zero sources in Google Books. Fails WP:BIO. Joe Chill ( talk) 13:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Wow. A deletionist. I love you guys. All I can offer is that he's on TV in Australia every night on an evening news program on SBS which broadcasts nationally, which of course doesn't leave a textual trace on the web because he's a broadcast TV reporter. Why not enjoy yourself and go ahead and delete it. Timbomb ( talk) 23:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
All that I can find in Google is 123people.com, monkees101.com which only has one sentence, sites to buy his books, profiles, unreliable sites, and Open Library. All that I can find in Google News is three trivial mentions in a local newspaper. All that I can find in Google Books is books by him. Fails WP:CREATIVE. Joe Chill ( talk) 13:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that there because the only sources that exist that cover this man are of his crimes, the article fails WP:BLP1E. NW ( Talk) 12:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I know the definition of "BLP1E" is disputed, but I believe this article in it's current form does fall under the term. The article covers nothing on this man other than one part of his life, how he got jailed for being a pedophile. — Coffee // have a cup // ark // 10:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep-The article is sourced and is indeed notable in that the guy was found guilty of 189 counts of indecent assault and sentenced to only 4 years. For WP:ONEEVENT, are you referring to the sentencing, or to the period during which he was assaulting these children?...there appears to be some lexical ambiguity in your statement. The article does need a bit work, but as it stands, it need not be nominated for deletion. Smallman12q ( talk) 13:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. This is a non-notable and unsourced WP:BLP article. I searched Google News Archive and found 1 relevant match, which was a passing one-liner mention from activeanime.com. That's it. JBsupreme ( talk) 08:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
There does not appear to be enough substance here to support a biographical article. He made the news only within the last few days because of his killing. However, there has been been no biographical coverage of this individual prior to this single event, and he was even described as a " little-known 47-year-old journalist who specialized in writing about economics" in one of the recent news articles about his death. Wikipedia:Notability says "it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute sufficient evidence of notability." Dominic· t 08:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Essentially this is a WP:FRINGE/ WP:FORK for Cornish nationalism (created by somebody of that political persuasion). No evidence that such an article is WP:Notable and its contents consists of WP:SYNTH and WP:OR. Nor is there any evidence that people from one county in England have especially high numbers of people in America, as to be worthy of an article. No other Encyclopedia in the world includes such an article. Delete as FORK political activism on the part of Joowww. - Yorkshirian ( talk) 07:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Fan club with 60 members and no evidence of notability. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 06:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Made-up word, obvious vehicle for WP:ARTSPAM of the company "Viscendo LLC," founded by Jody Basye. Borders (closely) on db-g11 as blatant advertising. User:Jodybasye contested my PROD. Glenfarclas ( talk) 06:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I deprodded this video game after I found one relatively short review on about.com I felt it deserves a discussion. (Besides, I see it has been brought to AfD before, so a prod was procedurally invalid.) Pcap ping 06:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Article is of unverifiable nature, based on unreliable conjecture citing no sources, though a Google search results in unreliable sources using the possible-hoax name "Pink Crust". Possible disparagement toward artist. Correct, updated, and verified information on the fourth studio album can be found on the Avril Lavigne article. Kerαunoςcopia◁ galaxies 06:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable video game. Arguably its notability should be discussed here, rather than edit warred over the redirect to the company, which itself may be deleted soon. Pcap ping 05:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This squadron, performing a ground combat service support function, is not notable. Any relevant material can either be placed at Shaw Air Force Base or 20th Fighter Wing. This nomination is in line with previously determined community consensus over separate non-combat ground forces' companies (a unit at the same level). See eg Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/101st Chemical Company (United States) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/722nd Ordnance Company (United States). Buckshot06 (talk) 05:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Unremarkable building, no evidence of notability for design or history. Acroterion (talk) 03:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Zaroo independent sources for this, hic. Pcap ping 03:31, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Improperly "citing" a single album as evidence for a genre's existence does not a legitimate genre make. C1k3 ( talk) 02:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was merge and redirect. Jayjg (talk) 00:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This is an EP by Stefani Germanotta, recorded a couple years before she found fame (pardon the pun) as Lady Gaga. The EP was apparently not released—the article claims a "handful of copies were sold at New York area shows"—and the only mentions I'm seeing for this are in fansites/forums, torrent links, etc. I can not find significant coverage in independent reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. Gongshow Talk 02:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This article has been tagged as needing sources for a long time and none have been presented even after extensive editing. Miami33139 ( talk) 02:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 02:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Delete. Well, at least I've heard of this one, it has that going for it. I searched Google News Archives and Google Books, with no success at finding substantial coverage from reliable third party publications. I tried queries "Enhanced Programmable ircII Client" and "EPIC +IRC". JBsupreme ( talk) 02:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep Passes WP:Prof ( WP:NACD) CTJF83 chat 20:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Typical academic CV - written articles, edited and contributed to multi-author books. Doesn'tseem particularly notable. Scott Mac (Doc) 01:12, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Jeff Chapman (Georgia politician). Cirt ( talk) 20:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
A waste disposal company. Having a notable founder does not make a company notable. The only external links were spam for the founder, not the company. Sgroupace ( talk) 18:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. nomination withdrawl - oops JForget 00:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The subject does not meet the notability criteria for a musician ( WP:MUSN. The article was written by the subject, and none of the references/external links meet the requirements for a reliable source WP:RS. The subject is also not notable as a software developer or entrepreneur WP:N.
I am not a New Yorker or a music aficionado, So I do not know how unusual it is for a child to appear at Carnegie Hall to perform his own work with a professional orchestra. It does not match the WP:MUSN criteria, but if we can find reliable sources that assert that this is unusual and that cite this particular performance, then we can establish notability. If someone can chime in and say "no, this happens a lot," then it's not notable.While looking for sources, also check "Gregori" in addition to "Gregory."
Arch dude ( talk) 16:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
It hardly ever happens that a child appears at Carnegie hall and performs his work with a professional orchestra. Magarshak was the youngest person to do this as far as I know, the youngest pianist to perform on that level. You can ascertain the notability at http://magarshak.com/piano where several TV programs and magazines are referenced. For example, in the article from "Daily News Magazine", "the youngest person ever to enter Juilliard on a scholarship". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.143.76.29 ( talk) 01:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Cite and Keep: I, the original deletion nominator, am changing my implicit !vote from "delete" to "keep", assuming that the outcome of the referencing effort is positive. See my talk page for details. If there is a process for withdrawing an AfD nomination, then we should do that. I would still appreciate another opinion: I almost never participate in AfD and I may not be doing this right. Basically we still have a COI newbie, but I intend to mitigate this by monitoring the article. - Arch dude ( talk) 23:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Formerly unreferenced BLP for which references are thin on the ground.
Does not seem to be generally notable; news mentions seem to be mainly passing references rather than in-depth coverage (VP sells stock! Hold the front page!) and most of the information in here is completely uncited. pablo hablo. 10:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 02:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:PORNBIO.
Epbr123 (
talk) 00:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
*Delete The article says Russell is circumcised and reportedly has a 7-inch penis.. Need I say more about the encylcopedic value (or lack thereof) of the article?--
Prodigy96 (
talk) 07:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC) User has been blocked, refer to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.
Ottawa4ever (
talk)
08:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
reply
*Keep because he won the mentioned 1995 award, which does help to establish some notability for inclusion.--TrustMe
THROW! 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) User has been blocked, refer to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Trusted_Throw for details.
Ottawa4ever (
talk)
08:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 20:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 ( talk) 00:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 ( talk) 00:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus. Beeblebrox ( talk) 03:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
A whopping total of 26 Google hits for this name. 161 for just " Gulzar Saifi", which is a redirect to this page. Other than that redirect, only two real Wiki pages actually link here--one for the film The Final Inch and one for the director of the film. Clearly not notable as an individual, although the film (of which he is reportedly the protagonist) certainly is. Most of this "biography" is actually information about the film. I recommend copying the small amount of biographical information from Mohammad Gulzar Saifi into the article The Final Inch and deleting with or without redirect. (A note: The user who started this article is currently unable to participate in this discussion due to the terms of an ArbCom decision. If it is felt that my nomination of the article at this time is inappropriate, please postpone it until he is able to contribute directly to the conversation.) Bueller 007 ( talk) 08:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 18:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Reference review:
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill ( talk) 18:48, 15 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:10, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
He seems to be a marginally notable academic. The article has been subjected to edit warring ranging from attempts to stub it to one sentence to adding silly puffery. I'm nominating it in the hope that the claim(s) for notability will become apparent. Pcap ping 05:56, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. ( non-admin closure) Tim Song ( talk) 02:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Hello there, Don the Sockpuppet made this nomination because no references exist for the article and it is written like a advertisement. Five Ton Sockpuppet ( talk) 00:46, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted, per WP:CSD #7 "No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content)." - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 10:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. No reliable sources to verify notability. Ricky81682 ( talk) 04:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This article does not meet the notability guidelines for Wikipedia. Much effort has been made on the part of Phantomsteve to research notability, but none was found. The creator and main editor, Stripedfox, has admitted to COI. See the talk page for a detailed discussion between Stripedfox and Phantomsteve. I had previously proposed this for deletion, but since it was controversial, the PROD was removed, therefore I am now nominating through this method. Joshua Scott ( talk) 02:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
I wanted to ask all of you several questions about this article and about Wikipedia guidelines. As I understand, the main argument was that all of the publications I signed were promotional and ATN maybe have payed money for the material about their company. And for example "The New York Times" is more trusted and respected magazine. But, as I know, publishing in "The New York Times" also costs money. Two years ago to place the article to the first page of this magazine was nearly 2000$. Now, I think, it is much more expensive. So, the first question is, do you consider that only that magazines which take more money for the place on their pages than the rest are more trusted than others?
As for the next question, I have already written about this some time ago and I want to repeat this again. This company does not produce products of daily use, but it offers equipment for Army, Law Enforcement, Police, hunting, hiking etc. So, I think that this branch is enough important for the general Encyclopedia like this one.
And as for the night vision and thermal night vision, do you really think that these inventions are not enough important for the world? And ATN were the fist who has developed some technologies for this branch, that many other companies now use (It is in my article).
Also I wanted to ask you to be so kind and list that magazines, publications and Award nominations that can be verified specifically for this industry. And I ask you not to write platitudes but to list concrete publications, which can really be interested to write an article about this company сonsidering it's specificity without money and which are really enough trusted for Wikipedia. Because I think that if there is no enough trusted sources for this concrete theme, it does not mean that this information is not interesting for Encyclopedia, that only means that there is info that is not enough developed in magazines, but despite that it still has it's informational value.
And for the last one, I give you the
link to the list of magazines and PDF files of the publications about this company. This list is constantly updated and I hope that you will find respected in this area magazines there that will be enough trusted for Wiki.
And I also wanted to recall that in other Encyclopedias only subject specialists approve articles, so if you are Language Specialist you should correct and approve only text, but not the informational content I think. And to approve or deny the article I will kindly ask you to consult with specialists in this concrete theme. That is all, I hope you will review your opinion after consulting with specialists about this theme and I will wait for your decision.
Stripedfox |
Talk
10:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Procedural - I declined a PROD on this one, since Gscholar turned up decent citation counts. I know nothing about archaeology and read no Hungarian however, so I refer here for further discussion Ray Talk 00:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply
I do not agree with the deletion. Notability and fame are not the same. His notability is supported by the above-written references. Earning fame in geoarcheology as in many other auxiliary sciences of archaeology or historiograpy (heraldics, faleristics, sfragistics) is practically impossible unless someone starts a National Geography TV carrier on some popular issue such as "How to dig out the Holy Grail?" My personal opinion is that we can find easier notable historians among 'unknown' researchers than among famous essayists compiling 1000 page best-sllers by up-grading commonplaces on popular issues. Rokarudi--Rokarudi 17:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Does not meet notability guidelines. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources (references provided are either primary ones, blogs or trivial). No indication of awards, charted singles or albums or anything else that might help meet notability guidelines. Not on a notable label either. RadioFan ( talk) 23:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
http://www.pegasusnews.com/news/2008/dec/13/live-review-one-lone-car-radiant-and-calhoun-lolas/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bball606 ( talk • contribs) 19:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 00:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable proprietary career college with no significant third-party references. Reads like an ad, author is apparently a single purpose account. Searching Fremont College on google returns three related hits: this article, and two links to their website, google news comes back with absolutely nothing.
Accredited or not, as a for-profit institution, Fremont should be held to the same notability standards as a business, and in that regard, it fails miserably. 2 says you, says two 23:12, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Not to be confused with any other person of the same name, the subjec of this minimally referenced biography is a TV presenter on QVC. The article is essentially a paraphrase of the QVC page on her. Press reporting seems largely limited to passing mentions and a stalking case some years back. No doubt well-known thanks to her work, but not necessarily "notable" in the WP:N Wikipedia sense. Not much here here really. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable website, article written by single-purpose user who is a co-founder of the company. There is some coverage here, but beyond that I have been unable to find any significant third-party coverage from reliable sources. Haakon ( talk) 21:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Thanks for your review, i understand the feedback and can provide significantly more links to articles written about Search3 from many sites, will that help? I can't do much about the WP:SPA if other independent people edit the document does that remove this concern? I also see many sites like ours within Wikipedia so would love your assistance to make this page more appropriate, can you help edit it?--
Cdclayton (
talk)
20:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. The IP user who was the person who actually wanted deletion did not come participate in the discussion, the formal nominator had no !vote, and nobody else has participated. With nobody actively calling for deletion, the most appropriate way to close is as keep, without prejudice to renomination if someone is actively willing to argue for deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Creating this debate page on behalf of [ 86.40.214.5] who did not complete all steps for AfD. Reason given was: "Notability is not inherited, this is a biography with no independent multiple reliable sources, graduating, having children and being married for 25 years is not notable" DOOMSDAYER520 ( Talk| Contribs) 16:33, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Autobiography of unremarkable wrestler. Fails WP:GNG. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 10:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge relevant content to Van Tuong Nguyen. Beeblebrox ( talk) 04:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Darshan Singh is only mentioned in primary sources, namely news sources, and only respect to a single event, namely the execution of Van Tuong Nguyen. He does not meet the general notability standard, nor the specific one for people, because of lack of coverage in secondary sources. See also People notable only for one event. Request Deletion Bejnar ( talk) 06:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 00:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
This article is unreferenced, and because of the nebulous subject matter, I see no way to reference it. Even if we verify the events described, we cannot easily verify that the culturual significance is anything other than the article author's opinion. Chutznik ( talk) 06:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. JForget 00:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable corporation, lacks external refs, is a small startup that never actually sold a product and was consumed by another company. MBisanz talk 05:59, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. JForget 00:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Considering the only source is an op-ed piece in a newspaper and the books don't appear to be notable on their own (the first is ranked 873,000th on WP), I believe he fails our notability guidelines. MBisanz talk 05:57, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:57, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Self-published book with no evidence of notability. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 04:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Article describes thing which no longer exists RawrMage ( talk) 19:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Non-notable role-playing game, with no coverage in reliable sources. TN X Man 21:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
Manga BoyZ is not a Manga but Role-playing_game ! Le Grimoire is a publisher in France since 1992. Manga BoyZ is one of the universe published by the editor. Four books are available. Reliable sources can be found. -- Ellwen ( talk) 19:12, 19 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. JForget 00:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill ( talk) 02:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Cirt ( talk) 00:56, 2 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill ( talk) 01:13, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 21:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Does not meet any of the criteria of WP:CREATIVE. May also fail WP:PROMO Wikipeterproject ( talk) 00:03, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cirt ( talk) 20:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Does not meet the criteria of WP:CREATIVE Wikipeterproject ( talk) 00:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC) reply