This user may have left Wikipedia. Blood Red Sandman has not edited Wikipedia since July 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

• Archive 1
• Archive 2

Hi, I have nominated Colin Hatch to be restored as the AFD result was a clear No Consensus vote. Join the discussion if you want to, Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_April_6#Colin_hatch.-- BabbaQ ( talk) 18:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I've noticed that there is little, if any, reporting on defense-related news on Wikinews. Is there a systemic reason, as in it's not alloowed, or is there an oversight/no one has bothered reason? Thanks. - BilCat ( talk) 01:30, 13 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Writing copy isn't my strong suit. Actually, I've been trying to interest User:Hcobb in rinting for Wikinews, per my comments here. Much of his contributions are borderline violations of Not-news, and he's quite prolific at it. (he even has a list of his "favorite" rejected edits on his user page!") He's able to dig sources up from almost anywhere, and I do think he'd be a good candidate for Wikinews. - BilCat ( talk) 23:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I have nominated Hamlet chicken processing plant fire for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Brad ( talk) 09:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Are you aware of any updates on the plant and the new construction? The article is badly out of date. Wzrd1 ( talk) 02:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC) reply

The plant was demolished years ago. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply

{{ Proposed deletion notify}} Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{( Otters want attention)} 22:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, and thank you for your offer. You may want to have a look at the list of historical monuments of Strasbourg on the french wikipedia. See also the Wiki Loves Monuments photo contest on commons. Regards, Comte0 ( talk) 13:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC) reply

• Thanks! I'll be sure to take a look at those in good time before I depart. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 19:17, 3 July 2011 (UTC) reply

You're welcome. Remember, there is no Freedom of panorama in France, monuments younger than 70 years old are still under copyright. However, after having looked at a few notices, I don't think this applies here. Regards, Comte0 ( talk) 21:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC) reply

What is the point of MediaWiki:Common.css/User:Brian McNeil and MediaWiki:Common.css/User talk:Brian McNeil? As far as I can see, they don't do anything, and per WP:SMI, it's probably good that it doesn't work. Ucucha ( talk) 13:44, 19 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Why are you asking me what they do? I have no idea. Perhaps you should ask the user who wrote them and requested they be imported.^{Edit: After several attempts I can't think of any way of phrasing that that doesn't sound more uncivil than I intend.} Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:59, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Because you made the edit, and you are responsible for your own edits. In any case, I'll ask the user. Ucucha ( talk) 17:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Indeed; and I responsibly decided that I trusted the user enough to allow them to take responsibility for the Common.css of their own user and talk pages. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:51, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply

{{ Db-csd-notice-custom}} Russavia ^{Let's dialogue} 11:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC) reply

I responded to you here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_war_at_Occupy_Marines JohnValeron ( talk) 21:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC) reply

As I have already made clear, I do not have the time available to clear this up. That is why I have posted to ANI, instead of clearing it up. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:12, 11 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Why have such a thing? Isn't that a measure of how many people you (or someone that would have such a thing) pissed off? Why is the amount of people angry with you something to be proud of? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.243.2.77 ( talk) 04:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Silliness, mostly. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Dear Blood Red Sandman,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar -- Jaobar ( talk)23:27, 17 April 2012 (UTC) reply

I merged your dup investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Labor Watch, FYI. Cheers, — Cirt ( talk) 15:14, 4 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• Pffft. It should, ideally, have edit conflcited. At any event, you didn't have any diffs, so that's pretty important information that's been added. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 15:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC) reply
  • No worries! — Cirt ( talk) 15:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC) reply
    • BRS likes this. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 15:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air Independence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Independence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- FoxyOrange ( talk) 10:14, 9 February 2013 (UTC) reply

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech ( talk) 15:58, 20 April 2013 (UTC) reply

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at the WP Scotland noticeboard. Richard Symonds (WMUK) ( talk) 16:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Template culled by talk owner

The article claims 28 fatalities but the only source cited in the article Aviation Safety Network indicates no fatalities. Other aviation websites ( planecrashinfo.com and [ airdisaster.com are both in error. Flight International (at flightglobal.com) indicates that there were no fatalities reported at the time of the accident. Furthermore, the accident in question is not listed in a summary of 1977 fatal accidents while it is listed in a summary of non-fatal accidents. Godot13 ( talk) 05:32, 13 July 2013 (UTC) reply

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot ( talk) 00:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 09:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC) reply

You are invited to join the discussion at WP:COIN#Michael Mic Neumann. You were involved in a prior discussion about that user. -- Lexein ( talk) 10:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Never mind, the matter was closed soon after this was posted. -- Lexein ( talk) 22:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks anyway. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 13:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC) reply

{{ User:BracketBot/inform}} BracketBot ( talk) 17:17, 11 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Whilst I'm delighted to see a bot is now looking out for such things, I can't help but think such a convuluted message for a single missed character is slightly counter-productive. I understood it. Would somebody just starting to learn the code understand it? I have my doubts. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 17:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC) reply

I looked over the 2009 CfD, and I noticed you were the creator. I am concerned that fires such as The Station are in a list like that because 1) they had adequate emergency exits, 2) none were obstructed, and 3) saying they had barricaded exits might constitute a BLP problem - a contentious and potentially libelous statement. The owners and operators of many of these places did not barricade or lock the exits. I don't mean to dig up old dirt (or whatever the phrase is), but I think this needs to be addressed. What about "Fire disasters involving restricted exits"? An exit can be restricted by a human pile-up blocking the door, which did happen at The Station. That's pretty much going to be the case whenever there aren't enough exits too - a progressive crowd collapse (human pile-up) will block the passageway. Same thing with overcrowding, again, like at the Station. Dcs002 ( talk) 05:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC) reply

I have been erroneously blocked on WikiNews by @ Pi zero: and cannot find a second admin to reverse their action to unblock me. If you can please review " user talk:Bawolff#WikiNews block error" and unblock me, it will be much appreciated, thanks! Nicole Sharp ( talk) 17:18, 8 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Truck-train collision.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ -- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao ^{Che dicono a Signa?} _{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

The article Atanas Todovichin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC) reply

The article Beer Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ONEEVENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 20:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beer Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beer Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{( What did I screw up now?)} 01:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC) reply

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas ( discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn ( discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction ( discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 ( discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip ( discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 ( discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 ( discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors ( ?) ω = 250,726 Ω = 4.93
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper ( discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A ( discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War ( discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps ( discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten ( discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality ( discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines ( discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation ( discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability ( discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability ( discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines ( discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack ( discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States ( discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways ( discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages ( discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon ( discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 ( discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) ( discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 ( discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 ( discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations ( discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra ( discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy ( discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz ( discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll ( discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC) reply

2007 Balad aircraft crash has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke ( talk) 19:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Truck-train collision.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 ( talk) 11:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Balad crash recorders.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 ( talk) 12:49, 18 April 2023 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UT Air Flight 471.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 ( talk) 13:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC) reply

2003 Chicago balcony collapse has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. — Compassionate727 ^{( T· C)} 22:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC) reply