The result was no consensus. — Aitias // discussion 17:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is a pure laundry list. It has no hope of ever being kept up to date, and has no encyclopaedic value. A category may be suitable (I wouldn't be suprised if one already existed - I haven't researched it), but an article definitely isn't. The same goes for List of teen films and List of teen magazines, which I also include in this AfD. Talk Islander 23:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The book meets none of the criteria set forth in WP:NB. It has won no awards, was not made into a movie, it isn't taught, and the author, Jack Higgins, can not be said to be so historically significant that his works are automatically notable. As for the first possible criterion, I can not find a single non-trivial mention of the book; all I see are sites that sell or swap used books or provide other non-significant mention. Drmies ( talk) 23:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because none of them are notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia (they have not received significant or any coverage, have won no awards, have not been turned into movies, etc.:
The result was delete ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Somewhat disjointed original research essay, possibly a hoax Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 22:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
*Keep I think it's a legitimate subject for an article. There appear to be enough sources. The article is a complete mess of original research however.
ChildofMidnight (
talk) 00:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was merge to Lane Cove, New South Wales#Education. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article about a non notable primary school is entirely unreferenced and written as a puff piece (a proud tradition of academic excellence, community participation, sporting achievement and a supportive environment in which to "Play the Game"). The only claim to any notability at all is the (unsupported) claim that Nicole Kidman attended the school. A previous PROD was removed by an uninvolved editor and the content merged and redirected to Lane Cove, New South Wales. This was reverted by the creating editor who continues to add more unsupported and promotional content.
No doubt there will be plenty of comment about the myth of "inherent notability" for schools. If this school is notable, then reliable, independent sources supporting that notability should be able to be found, over and above the usual "The NSW minister for education visited the school on such and such date" Mattinbgn\ talk 22:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
*Delete if we can't find a reliable source for the Kidman claim, weak keep if we can. Other than the Kidman thing, it doesn't generally meet
WP:SCHOOL - it's a primary school that doesn't have any claims to notability besides, well, being a primary school. Can't find reliable sources beyond directory info.
Graymornings
(talk) 23:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Yeah, on second thought, the Kidman connection still doesn't make it notable, and as it's not a high school, delete.
Graymornings
(talk) 00:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) DARTH PANDA duel 00:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The subject of this biography may be the CEO of a notable corporation, and may have a Forbes profile, but that does not assert his notability. my name inc 22:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:23, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A pleasant essay but pure original research. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 22:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Original page was merged into Characters of Kingdom Hearts (See Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Sora_(Kingdom_Hearts)). Garyzx ( talk) 22:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
College is not independently notable from main university. 16x9 ( talk) 21:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The article is not independently notable 16x9 ( talk) 21:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This college is not independently WP:N . 16x9 ( talk) 21:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. It looks like we're going to have a White Christmas after all Mgm| (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This school is not WP:N on its own with any third party sources. 16x9 ( talk) 21:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 10:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article on a book has no references, no information on notability, and the summary reads like an advertisement. See Wikipedia:Notability_(books). --smurdah ( talk) 21:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Judith Kerr. — Aitias // discussion 21:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails review per Wikipedia:Notability_(books) --smurdah ( talk) 21:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as copyright violation of website text marked "© Copyright 2008 BID2WIN Software Inc."
Smells a lot like WP:SPAM to me. Executive bio section is taken straight from their website ( [6]) and I suspect much of the rest is canned as well. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 20:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I hope Phil doesn't block me for this one... anyway, I've reviewed Mary DeMoss and concluded that it doesn't come close to meeting our verifiability requirements. There is not a single reliable, third-party source that could in any way be conceived to be primarily about this person. Google Books discusses several DeMoss families, but not a single mention of this particular individual. Google Scholar has exactly 1 hit, which appears to be a false match for someone else (it's related to United Methodism, not Scientology). There are some hits on the Google News archives but most of them aren't about this person, but about other people with the same name. You have to go down to about the 9th hit for even a passing mention. Mary DeMoss plus Scientology registers only 3 Google News hits, all passing mentions.
If you believe that this article should be kept, please either provide further third-party reliable sources that I was unable to find, or explain why 3 passing mentions in a local newspaper is sufficient for someone to have a Wikipedia article about them. *** Crotalus *** 20:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Jersey Devil ( talk) 07:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable local celebration; falls under WP:MADEUP WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:N, WP:ATHLETE, and WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. Player does not play professionally, has not played at the highest level of amateur hockey (Olympics or World Championships) and does not appear to have won ony major awards. – Nurmsook! talk... 19:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close as duplicate, by the same nominator, of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redencion 911 (2nd nomination). Please note that new AFD nominations go at the top of the per-day discussion pages, by the way. Uncle G ( talk) 19:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No indication of notability. smurdah ( talk) 17:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Black Kite 14:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The artist may be notable, but this single is not notable enough for its own article. See Wikipedia:Notability_(music). --smurdah ( talk) 19:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. — Aitias // discussion 17:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The artist may be notable, but this single is not notable enough for its own article. See Wikipedia:Notability_(music). --smurdah ( talk) 19:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. No chart = lack of notability. Converted to dab page per Esradekan. Black Kite 14:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The artist may be notable, but this single is not notable enough for its own article. See Wikipedia:Notability_(music). --smurdah ( talk) 19:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — Aitias // discussion 13:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Creation of a standalone article for JLS is both premature and unneccessary: premature because they are currently only known for their involvement in the X Factor and WP:BIO1E applies, and unneccessary because a bio already exists at List_of_The_X_Factor_finalists_(UK_series_5)#JLS. If they gain independent notability then an article would be appropriate but to assume they will before the event violates WP:CRYSTAL. Ros0709 ( talk) 00:06, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
*Speedy redirect to
List_of_The_X_Factor_finalists_(UK_series_5)#JLS. Not yet notable enough for their own article!
JS (
chat) 00:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
78.148.31.81 ( talk) 07:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Star Wars Expanded Universe. — Aitias // discussion 01:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A collection of snippets of plot summary from disparate Star Wars Expanded Universe sources -- but no overall assertion or substantiation that the items are themselves notable. References are to primary sources or in-universe encyclopedias/references that themselves offer just plot; no indication that the topic has been subject of any third-party coverage. Prose itself contains snippets of original research (e.g. "holocrons seem to indicate"). First two pages of Google Books search yields mostly the same in-universe texts as the article calls on; first out-of-universe use of the term is for a similarly-named mountain; another, a single parenthetical use of the word in a 310-page book. All together, the article fails WP:OR, WP:N. -- EEMIV ( talk) 18:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( A7). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:51, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Has not established notability as per Wikipedia:Notability_(music) smurdah ( talk) 18:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( A7). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:52, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No notability established beyond a Myspace and a Youtube page. smurdah ( talk) 18:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Local musician of barely asserted notability who doesn't appear to have any RS coverage. Author believes MUSICBIO should be altered to allow for inclusion. A7 declined by another admin. Jclemens ( talk) 18:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. I've spent quite a while perusing Special:Contributions/Anhydrobiosis, and have come to the conclusion that this was not a good faith nomination, despite the appearance of the text below. More to come on the administrator's noticeboard. I've removed the merger proposal as well. Uncle G ( talk) 20:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article on a letter in the English language is unremarkable as just one of many letters in the alphabet. It has no inline citations, is confusing, has a non adequate beginning, and is written like an essay. Spencer Divonn'io the glorious ( talk) 18:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web site; despite a single external reference. Blowdart | talk 18:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Avatar: The Last Airbender. History retained if an editor wants to merge some material. Cirt ( talk) 10:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NFF, this article should not exist until filming begins. Many films have been cancelled in pre-production. Suitable coverage about the planned film trilogy is already avaliable at Avatar: The Last Airbender. Alientraveller ( talk) 18:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A drinking-related neologism that doesn't stand up to a sober Google search. I believe we can pour this one out. Ecoleetage ( talk) 17:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Jersey Devil ( talk) 07:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A contested prod. A tragic event, but an event all the same. Wikipedia is not the news and there is no evidence of enduring coverage of this, leaving it as a news story. Based on that the subject fails WP:BIO and WP:ONEEVENT Nuttah ( talk) 17:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod - author deleted prod without explanation. Personal opinion essay on one specific topic (abortion), material is covered elswhere Dawn Bard ( talk) 16:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 08:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. This band amounts to a few self produced CDs and a review or two in the local paper. To date, there's not enough to satisfy WP:BAND so the band fails notability requirements. Nuttah ( talk) 15:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Listed in Sources are: - 3 newspaper articles - 1 magazine article - proof that they have performed music for a compilation (entry #9).
Furthermore, the article says that they won a major music competition – playing warped tour via the ernie ball contest. You can’t refute that. There’s a newspaper article (sources entry #4) and picture (sources entry #3) backing it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecto12 ( talk • contribs) 02:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Republic of Morac-Songhrati-Meads. Sandstein 09:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to be a notable micronation. Stifle ( talk) 15:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This doesn't appear to be a notable ship. There's little more to say about it that it exists and provide its service history. Stifle ( talk) 14:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
There is (still) nothing in this article to suggest that this fraternity is any more notable than the tens of thousands of others in the USA. Most of the opinions at the previous AFD amounted to WP:WAX-type arguments. Stifle ( talk) 14:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Very sad case, but Wikipedia is not a memorial. Stifle ( talk) 14:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
As per the previous AFD, this dead-end list consisting mostly of redlinks would be better as a self-maintaining category. Stifle ( talk) 14:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No third-party references or serious evidence of meeting WP:ORG. Hasn't improved since the last AFD. Stifle ( talk) 14:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Sustainable tourism. — Aitias // discussion 01:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
"Humane Travel" seems to be more associated with transportation of animals rather than any form of tourism. I've tried and not been particularly successful, to find anything to assert the notability of the term. The article appears to be an essay rather than an article. The concept is a perfectly reasonable concept, but is not ready yet as an encyclopaedic concept. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 13:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
While he has a few published books to his name, I haven't been able to find any secondary sources, or press coverage on him using the Google news archive. That would make me think this person is not notable via WP:BIO. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 13:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 18:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:BLP1E Mayalld ( talk) 13:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete unredeemably POV screed, poorly titled, so as to offer no context as to which ceasefire was being violated Mayalld ( talk) 13:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete nn film, fails WP:NOTFILM Mayalld ( talk) 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Gratified that WP:AGF allows you to read my mind. How many fingers am I holding up now? Well... and despite your telepathic abilities, I do not believe notability is inherited, and am saddened that that is all you were able to discern from my response. Am also saddened that you seem to interpret WP:AGF in a manner that benefits only yours and no other's opinions. Conversely, you now underscore my own concern in your belief that because the article is difficult to source then it ipso-facto non-notable. I note that each guideline begins with the caveat that they should be "best treated with common sense and the occasional exception." I am voicing my belief that because of the notable and award-winning director who created the project AND and because of the number of Telugu notables involved in the project, that non-English sources are likely to exist. I am not saying that their being notable makes the project also notable, only that because of their participation, non-English sources quite likely exist. Further, the involvement of these notables allows me the presumption that 37 years ago (PRE-INTERNET / PRE-WIKIPEDIA) there were likely innumerable Telugu reliable HARDCOPY sources speaking toward notability. That these hardcopy sources have not found themselves in English film or news archives does not mean they did not then exist. Since notability is not temporary, I will accept an aged notability as having then existed. WP:NF does not mandate the sources be used... only that a logical presumption of their existance be made. Allowing a little leeway for a Telegu film because of the lack of English sources is "common sense" and is the "occasional exception" to which guidelines refer. I do not expect you to agree in the slightest. I fully expect you to once again attack my reasoning. That incivility is yours and not mine. Thank you and Merry Christmas. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:BLP1E Mayalld ( talk) 12:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep — nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk) 18:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Don't want to start a campaign against Macedonian sports teams, but I cannot see what makes this club notable, and the article's shortness doesn't help either. Although the arcticle about the Macedonian Treta Liga claims this division to be professional, it's quite obvious that it's not: It's a country of just 2 million people, its national team has never qualified for a European championship, yet still its best players prefer to play elsewhere. Therefore, including clubs from the first and second division seems sufficient to me. This would affect the other clubs listed in Macedonian Treta Liga, too, but some of them might have once played in the second devision, which is why I didn't nominate multiple articles. Axolotl Nr.733 ( talk) 12:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Only significant coverage found is an obituary in a local newspaper. Epbr123 ( talk) 11:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of Portuguese supercentenarians. Sandstein 09:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Centenarian with no significant independent coverage. Epbr123 ( talk) 11:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
But I digress. Let's start with the nominator's rationale:"centenarian." Actually, this person is a supercentenarian, and only about 1 in 1,000 centenarians will reach super status, so try to get your vocabulary straight. Second, it's far, far more rare to live to 113 (less than 200 verified cases, all-time) than it is to be a college football player, yet we see scores of gratuitous articles on such recentist claptrap.
By the way, I suggest this article could be merged into the list of Portuguese supercentenarians article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Portuguese_supercentenarians
Ryoung122 12:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Inicio :: Sucesos 11 de ene, 2004
Segunda más longeva cumplió 113 años
Lisboa, (Notimex).- La segunda mujer más longeva del mundo, Catarina Carreiro, residente en Idanha a Nova, nordeste de Portugal, celebra su cumpleaños 113 en compañía de sus seis hijos, 26 nietos, 39 bisnietos y siete tataranietos.
TIENDA VIRTUAL
Charola de canapés $400.00
Pasteles y Galletas
Catarina Carreiro, conocida también como "Ti Catrina dAvo", quien nació en 1891, tenia 19 años cuando la República fue implantada en Portugal en 1910, y sólo le faltaban dos años para cumplir los cincuenta cuando empezó la II Guerra mundial, en 1939.
Según el libro Guiness Book of Records, la mujer más longeva del mundo es la norteamericana Charlotte Benker, quien nació el 16 de noviembre de 1889, un año y 54 días antes de "Ti Catrina dAvo".
Ambas están todavía lejos del récord de la francesa Jeanne Luise Calment, fallecida en agosto de 1997 con 122 años, pero superaron con mucho la actual esperanza media de vida de la población mundial que es inferior a los 70 años.
Entre los hombre, el récord pertenece al español Joan Riudavets Moll, quien en diciembre pasado cumpió 114 años, según el libro Guiness. La longevidad de Catarina Carreiro no es un fenómeno inédito en su familia: su padre, albañil de profesión, vivió hasta los 105 anos.
El hijo menor de Catarina Carreiro tiene 69 años y el más grande 84.
"Ti Catrina dAvo", según dijo a la prensa una de sus nueras, celebrara su cumpleaños 113 sin grandes festejos porque se encuentra debilitada y sólo se levanta por la tarde.
The point is, there actually are reliable sources about this person. Ryoung122 12:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Notable enough, delete per this precedent. Philip Stevens ( talk) 11:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn Mgm| (talk) 09:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Multiple editors have tagged this for A7. Article was cleaned, then spamified. Probably time for an official discussion. Oliver Twisted (Talk) 10:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted as a combination of a7-group and G10. Jclemens ( talk) 05:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
It's a halls of residence. No need for a breakdown of floor-by-floor summary of such a location on wikipedia, e.g. "on first floor there is the poop bathroom". Oscarthecat ( talk) 09:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY because it doesn't establish why this intersection is notable. Also seems to confuse Israelis for a single ethnic group when they constitute a nationality. Cordless Larry ( talk) 09:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Stevvvv4444 ( talk) 12:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 18:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable neologism. Urban Dictionary does not a meme make. Ironholds ( talk) 08:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 13:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Advert for non-notable software package. My Google search suggests about 100 installations rather than the 29,000 claimed in the article. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 06:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 07:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable. The information on the expression is not cited, although it sounds reasonable. None of the sources explain anything about it. They just use the expression in one way or another. Northwestgnome ( talk) 06:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete (G3) by Efe. Non-admin closure, THEN WHO WAS PHONE? ( talk) 09:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
IMDB does not show a Mark Flores with these credits. WP:HOAX. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 06:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. per WP:SNOW. Mgm| (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
May be a Neologism WP:NEO. This terms seems to have been coined in the book: King Power In Chess by Edmar Mednis. [26]. I can't find a single other reference to this phrase in any other book on Chess or Games on Google, Google Book Search, Amazon, or Yahoo. Oliver Twisted (Talk) 06:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
omg, srsly azimsultan ( talk) 06:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Phil (rapper) and Phil created by the same editor seem to fail: WP:BIO. Open to discussion. Oliver Twisted (Talk) 05:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete as blatant vandalism. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 21:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
It is disgusting that another piece of nonsense from The biggest jimmy has survived for three days. The Topkapi kebab shop is no different from hundreds of similar shops in London alone and its proprietor no more notable than hundreds of others. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 05:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Block creator! Ha, if you were to read through my contributions you'd see some well researched and well written complete articles, why not write your own exclusive encyclopedia purely for your own reference then?
I assume that this must be what the warning about grumpy users that's in the standard user talk page refers to? And that I shouldn't be scared off regardless. I do find it quite a revelation that anyone could be "disgusted" though at an article remaining in place for 3 days? Personally I reserve words like 'disgust' (or equally 'passion') for real world events that are worthy of, and stir genuine human emotion like say violent crime, corruption, love ..etc, maybe it's time to evaluate what percentage of the real world over zealous "policing" of wikipedia is for you. The biggest jimmy ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC). reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Can't find RS. Could be a hoax, or I could have just missed something. Can't decide on notability either way if real. Dloh cierekim 05:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable music autobiographical article that apparently was deleted in the past (see User talk:Stressdadon) and has since been re-created. Wavehunter ( talk) 05:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Individual companies of the Boys' Brigade (or the Scouts) are not notable. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 04:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A mixed martial artist: I can not establish competition at a notable level. Contested prod. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? ( talk) 04:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. nonsense El on ka 05:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a neologism. Was previously deleted as Cock pushup. Tone of article tries to imply this is valid, medical advice. Oliver Twisted (Talk) 04:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a hoax. Could be A7 but claims to have "invented surround sound" so I'm taking to AFD Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 03:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 14:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Only one ghit, on another Wikipedia page, Efrain Escudero. WP:MADEUP or WP:HOAX. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 03:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Well, its not a hoax, or made up. The term is used quite frequently within the MMA community. Most of the time it is used by MMA sports journalists, and was even mentioned by Mike Goldberg on Spike TV during The Ultimate Fighter finale.
In fact, since that very night there have been many fans wanting to know what The Pima Effect is. Message boards get flooded with this question. So I decided to create an article. Thought I was helping out.
I'm not very good at making articles, sorry if it does not look very good. I'm still editing it to make it look more professional. But you marked it for deletion within the first couple minutes of its creation. So I hadn't had a chance to perfect it yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IcyB ( talk • contribs) 03:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
It was Escudero's wikipedia that popularized the term. No they were being flooded because it was Efrain Escudero who was being featured on Spike TV. Up until that point the term was rarely used. But ever since Escudero got the term mentioned on Live Television people have been asking about the term, and as such it has been used much more frequently. Escudero popularized the term, perhaps because of his wikipedia. I think once the term is actually properly defined, it will be linked to the other fighters.
I don't think a term can be properly added to other MMA fighters wikipedia's until it has one itself. Now that there is a wikipedia for the term, I think it justifies adding the term to the Varner, Fickett, Forbes, Martinez, Roop, Hightower, Pima, and RITC articles.
I am still making the article, I'll add a referance section. Just give me time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IcyB ( talk • contribs) 03:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Mixed drink "invented" in 2008; meets WP:MADEUP. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 02:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Snowball keep, withdrawn by nominator. I was not reasing the text carefully, sorry. `' Míkka >t 15:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A murder case without particular notability explained. `' Míkka >t 02:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
40,000 of 190,000,000 people in Brazil - insignificant. Punkmorten ( talk) 13:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to All Monsters Attack. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 07:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of All Monsters Attack through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN ( talk) 23:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ORG lacks evidence to prove notability including significant third party coverage. Michellecrisp ( talk) 06:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Was previously deleted in November because it cannot be verified this season is actually in production. Mgm| (talk) 09:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Pure speculation (it's even said in the article). Violates what Wikipedia is not. David WS (contribs) 02:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Rock Island, Illinois. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is about a non-notable religous structure. It may become notable in the future, but at present it is not notable. Also, there are no reliable sources to verify claims in the article. Thanks. Ism schism ( talk) 20:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Mgm| (talk) 09:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No Assertion of Notability, can't find any mentions in news sources/notable music sites. \ / ( ⁂) 21:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable unsigned band - fails WP:MUSIC on all counts. dramatic ( talk) 20:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 07:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NSONGS. Hasn't charted, hasn't won any awards, and hasn't been covered by multiple artists. From an unreleased and as-of-yet untitled album, so I originally redirect to artist. Editors have been edit-warring the redirect, so deletion seems to be the appropriate answer. — Kww( talk) 00:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This individual may or may not be notable enough for an article. I declined the speedy delete request because there is an assertion of notability here. Perhaps the UK editors know more about him than I. JodyB talk 00:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Claim of notability is apparently a championship with a nonnotable wrestling organization. Orphaned; dead-end; unsourced; very little information available on google. Speedy declined. HeureusementIci ( talk) 00:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. The incoming links are indicative of editor collaboration and are the result of this article being listed in a maintenance category. Potential COI by an author of an article alone is not cause for deletion, as long as the article is neutral. Since COI can influence ones editing, it is discouraged, but not disallowed to edit such articles. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 06:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Advert. A look at the incoming links show over 85% from user pages, most interesting. Primary author appears to have a direct connection with this institution, a clear conflict of interest. B.Wind ( talk) 03:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Claims to be the largest VFW in the world. While I have found sources that mention this, they only do so in passing, and I can find no substantial coverage in reliable sources. A claim to notability is worthless if you can't back it up. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 05:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Prodded this as a non-notable ep without realizing it had already been prodded. All other episodes from this show's first season have been deleted, and I don't want to see 100-some eps all redirected to List of Garfield and Friends episodes as it would be pure chaos. I see absoutely nothing that makes this a notable episode; it's an overly detailed plot summary devoid of sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 05:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 18:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete - no reliable sources indicate that this person passes our notability guidelines. Speedy deletion tag improperly removed by the article's creator. Otto4711 ( talk) 11:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Initiating this AfD on behalf of Largoplazo ( talk · contribs). Apparently, because of technical difficulties, this AfD was only partially completed, and the deletion rationale lost. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 16:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Magazine with no assertion of notability. The article's creator has been reported by a bot at WP:UAA. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 16:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
One EP on a possibly notable label, plus an LP on another possibly notable lael. Nothing significant in News, no other reliable sources found. Only sources are unreliable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 14:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Original research, no topic exists google scholar search Wapondaponda ( talk) 17:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
unref'd article about a NN local tv station fails WP:CORP. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn. [35] ( non-admin closure) — neuro (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is about someone who appears to be a rather minor actor and is filled with disinformation. His most notable claim to fame is as a director of the film " Highlander II: The Unholy Alliance" and that he made a cameo in Highlander: The Series as a cavalry captain. In reality all he did was appear in Highlander: The Series as a cavalry captain in the episode "The Unholy Alliance, pt 2". Perhaps he is more notable than I thought and he does have several French language credits, but since I don't speak French I cannot attest to how notable any of them are. A ni Mate 20:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
In recognition of his study of Minister Paul Barbe (1836-1890), as part of his contribution to the biography of Alfred Nobel by Swedish filmmaker Vilgot Sjömann, Hjärtebarn (Stockholm, 1995), he was rewarded by the creation of a Manuel Bonnet dossier at the Nobel Archives in Stockholm. He worked for Max Lavigne and participated in his latest book: 'Chantecoq'. Royal de la Cité to the Republican Commune (Paris 1996). He is also an author of documentary films. Directed by M. Kapture, ‘Two gendarmes in the Pacific’ (RFO / CINETEVE 2000), which won the Lucien Kimitété award at the Groix Film Festival in 2002. He studied at the prestigious Conservatoire national supérieur d'art dramatique in Paris from 1973. The 'jewelry' entry is completely unproven. imo. Personally, I reckon he's notable enough, but then I am francophile and this is en:wiki Dickie ( talk) 08:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 18:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article about a nonnotable actor who never has moved beyond being an extra and playing minor characters. The article also appears to have been created with a conflict of interest. Themfromspace ( talk) 00:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. — Aitias // discussion 17:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is a pure laundry list. It has no hope of ever being kept up to date, and has no encyclopaedic value. A category may be suitable (I wouldn't be suprised if one already existed - I haven't researched it), but an article definitely isn't. The same goes for List of teen films and List of teen magazines, which I also include in this AfD. Talk Islander 23:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The book meets none of the criteria set forth in WP:NB. It has won no awards, was not made into a movie, it isn't taught, and the author, Jack Higgins, can not be said to be so historically significant that his works are automatically notable. As for the first possible criterion, I can not find a single non-trivial mention of the book; all I see are sites that sell or swap used books or provide other non-significant mention. Drmies ( talk) 23:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because none of them are notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia (they have not received significant or any coverage, have won no awards, have not been turned into movies, etc.:
The result was delete ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Somewhat disjointed original research essay, possibly a hoax Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 22:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
*Keep I think it's a legitimate subject for an article. There appear to be enough sources. The article is a complete mess of original research however.
ChildofMidnight (
talk) 00:11, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was merge to Lane Cove, New South Wales#Education. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article about a non notable primary school is entirely unreferenced and written as a puff piece (a proud tradition of academic excellence, community participation, sporting achievement and a supportive environment in which to "Play the Game"). The only claim to any notability at all is the (unsupported) claim that Nicole Kidman attended the school. A previous PROD was removed by an uninvolved editor and the content merged and redirected to Lane Cove, New South Wales. This was reverted by the creating editor who continues to add more unsupported and promotional content.
No doubt there will be plenty of comment about the myth of "inherent notability" for schools. If this school is notable, then reliable, independent sources supporting that notability should be able to be found, over and above the usual "The NSW minister for education visited the school on such and such date" Mattinbgn\ talk 22:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
*Delete if we can't find a reliable source for the Kidman claim, weak keep if we can. Other than the Kidman thing, it doesn't generally meet
WP:SCHOOL - it's a primary school that doesn't have any claims to notability besides, well, being a primary school. Can't find reliable sources beyond directory info.
Graymornings
(talk) 23:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Yeah, on second thought, the Kidman connection still doesn't make it notable, and as it's not a high school, delete.
Graymornings
(talk) 00:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
The result was Nomination Withdrawn. ( non-admin closure) DARTH PANDA duel 00:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The subject of this biography may be the CEO of a notable corporation, and may have a Forbes profile, but that does not assert his notability. my name inc 22:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:23, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A pleasant essay but pure original research. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 22:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Original page was merged into Characters of Kingdom Hearts (See Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Sora_(Kingdom_Hearts)). Garyzx ( talk) 22:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
College is not independently notable from main university. 16x9 ( talk) 21:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The article is not independently notable 16x9 ( talk) 21:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This college is not independently WP:N . 16x9 ( talk) 21:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. It looks like we're going to have a White Christmas after all Mgm| (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This school is not WP:N on its own with any third party sources. 16x9 ( talk) 21:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Cirt ( talk) 10:39, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article on a book has no references, no information on notability, and the summary reads like an advertisement. See Wikipedia:Notability_(books). --smurdah ( talk) 21:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Judith Kerr. — Aitias // discussion 21:16, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails review per Wikipedia:Notability_(books) --smurdah ( talk) 21:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as copyright violation of website text marked "© Copyright 2008 BID2WIN Software Inc."
Smells a lot like WP:SPAM to me. Executive bio section is taken straight from their website ( [6]) and I suspect much of the rest is canned as well. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 20:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
I hope Phil doesn't block me for this one... anyway, I've reviewed Mary DeMoss and concluded that it doesn't come close to meeting our verifiability requirements. There is not a single reliable, third-party source that could in any way be conceived to be primarily about this person. Google Books discusses several DeMoss families, but not a single mention of this particular individual. Google Scholar has exactly 1 hit, which appears to be a false match for someone else (it's related to United Methodism, not Scientology). There are some hits on the Google News archives but most of them aren't about this person, but about other people with the same name. You have to go down to about the 9th hit for even a passing mention. Mary DeMoss plus Scientology registers only 3 Google News hits, all passing mentions.
If you believe that this article should be kept, please either provide further third-party reliable sources that I was unable to find, or explain why 3 passing mentions in a local newspaper is sufficient for someone to have a Wikipedia article about them. *** Crotalus *** 20:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Jersey Devil ( talk) 07:55, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable local celebration; falls under WP:MADEUP WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 19:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:N, WP:ATHLETE, and WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. Player does not play professionally, has not played at the highest level of amateur hockey (Olympics or World Championships) and does not appear to have won ony major awards. – Nurmsook! talk... 19:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy close as duplicate, by the same nominator, of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redencion 911 (2nd nomination). Please note that new AFD nominations go at the top of the per-day discussion pages, by the way. Uncle G ( talk) 19:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No indication of notability. smurdah ( talk) 17:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Black Kite 14:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The artist may be notable, but this single is not notable enough for its own article. See Wikipedia:Notability_(music). --smurdah ( talk) 19:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. — Aitias // discussion 17:30, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The artist may be notable, but this single is not notable enough for its own article. See Wikipedia:Notability_(music). --smurdah ( talk) 19:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. No chart = lack of notability. Converted to dab page per Esradekan. Black Kite 14:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The artist may be notable, but this single is not notable enough for its own article. See Wikipedia:Notability_(music). --smurdah ( talk) 19:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. — Aitias // discussion 13:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Creation of a standalone article for JLS is both premature and unneccessary: premature because they are currently only known for their involvement in the X Factor and WP:BIO1E applies, and unneccessary because a bio already exists at List_of_The_X_Factor_finalists_(UK_series_5)#JLS. If they gain independent notability then an article would be appropriate but to assume they will before the event violates WP:CRYSTAL. Ros0709 ( talk) 00:06, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply
*Speedy redirect to
List_of_The_X_Factor_finalists_(UK_series_5)#JLS. Not yet notable enough for their own article!
JS (
chat) 00:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
reply
78.148.31.81 ( talk) 07:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Star Wars Expanded Universe. — Aitias // discussion 01:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A collection of snippets of plot summary from disparate Star Wars Expanded Universe sources -- but no overall assertion or substantiation that the items are themselves notable. References are to primary sources or in-universe encyclopedias/references that themselves offer just plot; no indication that the topic has been subject of any third-party coverage. Prose itself contains snippets of original research (e.g. "holocrons seem to indicate"). First two pages of Google Books search yields mostly the same in-universe texts as the article calls on; first out-of-universe use of the term is for a similarly-named mountain; another, a single parenthetical use of the word in a 310-page book. All together, the article fails WP:OR, WP:N. -- EEMIV ( talk) 18:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( A7). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:51, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Has not established notability as per Wikipedia:Notability_(music) smurdah ( talk) 18:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete ( A7). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:52, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No notability established beyond a Myspace and a Youtube page. smurdah ( talk) 18:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete ( WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Local musician of barely asserted notability who doesn't appear to have any RS coverage. Author believes MUSICBIO should be altered to allow for inclusion. A7 declined by another admin. Jclemens ( talk) 18:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. I've spent quite a while perusing Special:Contributions/Anhydrobiosis, and have come to the conclusion that this was not a good faith nomination, despite the appearance of the text below. More to come on the administrator's noticeboard. I've removed the merger proposal as well. Uncle G ( talk) 20:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article on a letter in the English language is unremarkable as just one of many letters in the alphabet. It has no inline citations, is confusing, has a non adequate beginning, and is written like an essay. Spencer Divonn'io the glorious ( talk) 18:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web site; despite a single external reference. Blowdart | talk 18:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Avatar: The Last Airbender. History retained if an editor wants to merge some material. Cirt ( talk) 10:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Per WP:NFF, this article should not exist until filming begins. Many films have been cancelled in pre-production. Suitable coverage about the planned film trilogy is already avaliable at Avatar: The Last Airbender. Alientraveller ( talk) 18:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A drinking-related neologism that doesn't stand up to a sober Google search. I believe we can pour this one out. Ecoleetage ( talk) 17:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Jersey Devil ( talk) 07:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A contested prod. A tragic event, but an event all the same. Wikipedia is not the news and there is no evidence of enduring coverage of this, leaving it as a news story. Based on that the subject fails WP:BIO and WP:ONEEVENT Nuttah ( talk) 17:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested Prod - author deleted prod without explanation. Personal opinion essay on one specific topic (abortion), material is covered elswhere Dawn Bard ( talk) 16:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 08:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. This band amounts to a few self produced CDs and a review or two in the local paper. To date, there's not enough to satisfy WP:BAND so the band fails notability requirements. Nuttah ( talk) 15:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Listed in Sources are: - 3 newspaper articles - 1 magazine article - proof that they have performed music for a compilation (entry #9).
Furthermore, the article says that they won a major music competition – playing warped tour via the ernie ball contest. You can’t refute that. There’s a newspaper article (sources entry #4) and picture (sources entry #3) backing it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecto12 ( talk • contribs) 02:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Republic of Morac-Songhrati-Meads. Sandstein 09:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Does not appear to be a notable micronation. Stifle ( talk) 15:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This doesn't appear to be a notable ship. There's little more to say about it that it exists and provide its service history. Stifle ( talk) 14:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
There is (still) nothing in this article to suggest that this fraternity is any more notable than the tens of thousands of others in the USA. Most of the opinions at the previous AFD amounted to WP:WAX-type arguments. Stifle ( talk) 14:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Very sad case, but Wikipedia is not a memorial. Stifle ( talk) 14:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
As per the previous AFD, this dead-end list consisting mostly of redlinks would be better as a self-maintaining category. Stifle ( talk) 14:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No third-party references or serious evidence of meeting WP:ORG. Hasn't improved since the last AFD. Stifle ( talk) 14:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Sustainable tourism. — Aitias // discussion 01:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
"Humane Travel" seems to be more associated with transportation of animals rather than any form of tourism. I've tried and not been particularly successful, to find anything to assert the notability of the term. The article appears to be an essay rather than an article. The concept is a perfectly reasonable concept, but is not ready yet as an encyclopaedic concept. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 13:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
While he has a few published books to his name, I haven't been able to find any secondary sources, or press coverage on him using the Google news archive. That would make me think this person is not notable via WP:BIO. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 13:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 18:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:BLP1E Mayalld ( talk) 13:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete unredeemably POV screed, poorly titled, so as to offer no context as to which ceasefire was being violated Mayalld ( talk) 13:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete nn film, fails WP:NOTFILM Mayalld ( talk) 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Gratified that WP:AGF allows you to read my mind. How many fingers am I holding up now? Well... and despite your telepathic abilities, I do not believe notability is inherited, and am saddened that that is all you were able to discern from my response. Am also saddened that you seem to interpret WP:AGF in a manner that benefits only yours and no other's opinions. Conversely, you now underscore my own concern in your belief that because the article is difficult to source then it ipso-facto non-notable. I note that each guideline begins with the caveat that they should be "best treated with common sense and the occasional exception." I am voicing my belief that because of the notable and award-winning director who created the project AND and because of the number of Telugu notables involved in the project, that non-English sources are likely to exist. I am not saying that their being notable makes the project also notable, only that because of their participation, non-English sources quite likely exist. Further, the involvement of these notables allows me the presumption that 37 years ago (PRE-INTERNET / PRE-WIKIPEDIA) there were likely innumerable Telugu reliable HARDCOPY sources speaking toward notability. That these hardcopy sources have not found themselves in English film or news archives does not mean they did not then exist. Since notability is not temporary, I will accept an aged notability as having then existed. WP:NF does not mandate the sources be used... only that a logical presumption of their existance be made. Allowing a little leeway for a Telegu film because of the lack of English sources is "common sense" and is the "occasional exception" to which guidelines refer. I do not expect you to agree in the slightest. I fully expect you to once again attack my reasoning. That incivility is yours and not mine. Thank you and Merry Christmas. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 21:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:BLP1E Mayalld ( talk) 12:28, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep — nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. MuZemike ( talk) 18:21, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Don't want to start a campaign against Macedonian sports teams, but I cannot see what makes this club notable, and the article's shortness doesn't help either. Although the arcticle about the Macedonian Treta Liga claims this division to be professional, it's quite obvious that it's not: It's a country of just 2 million people, its national team has never qualified for a European championship, yet still its best players prefer to play elsewhere. Therefore, including clubs from the first and second division seems sufficient to me. This would affect the other clubs listed in Macedonian Treta Liga, too, but some of them might have once played in the second devision, which is why I didn't nominate multiple articles. Axolotl Nr.733 ( talk) 12:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Only significant coverage found is an obituary in a local newspaper. Epbr123 ( talk) 11:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to List of Portuguese supercentenarians. Sandstein 09:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Centenarian with no significant independent coverage. Epbr123 ( talk) 11:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
But I digress. Let's start with the nominator's rationale:"centenarian." Actually, this person is a supercentenarian, and only about 1 in 1,000 centenarians will reach super status, so try to get your vocabulary straight. Second, it's far, far more rare to live to 113 (less than 200 verified cases, all-time) than it is to be a college football player, yet we see scores of gratuitous articles on such recentist claptrap.
By the way, I suggest this article could be merged into the list of Portuguese supercentenarians article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Portuguese_supercentenarians
Ryoung122 12:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Inicio :: Sucesos 11 de ene, 2004
Segunda más longeva cumplió 113 años
Lisboa, (Notimex).- La segunda mujer más longeva del mundo, Catarina Carreiro, residente en Idanha a Nova, nordeste de Portugal, celebra su cumpleaños 113 en compañía de sus seis hijos, 26 nietos, 39 bisnietos y siete tataranietos.
TIENDA VIRTUAL
Charola de canapés $400.00
Pasteles y Galletas
Catarina Carreiro, conocida también como "Ti Catrina dAvo", quien nació en 1891, tenia 19 años cuando la República fue implantada en Portugal en 1910, y sólo le faltaban dos años para cumplir los cincuenta cuando empezó la II Guerra mundial, en 1939.
Según el libro Guiness Book of Records, la mujer más longeva del mundo es la norteamericana Charlotte Benker, quien nació el 16 de noviembre de 1889, un año y 54 días antes de "Ti Catrina dAvo".
Ambas están todavía lejos del récord de la francesa Jeanne Luise Calment, fallecida en agosto de 1997 con 122 años, pero superaron con mucho la actual esperanza media de vida de la población mundial que es inferior a los 70 años.
Entre los hombre, el récord pertenece al español Joan Riudavets Moll, quien en diciembre pasado cumpió 114 años, según el libro Guiness. La longevidad de Catarina Carreiro no es un fenómeno inédito en su familia: su padre, albañil de profesión, vivió hasta los 105 anos.
El hijo menor de Catarina Carreiro tiene 69 años y el más grande 84.
"Ti Catrina dAvo", según dijo a la prensa una de sus nueras, celebrara su cumpleaños 113 sin grandes festejos porque se encuentra debilitada y sólo se levanta por la tarde.
The point is, there actually are reliable sources about this person. Ryoung122 12:17, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Notable enough, delete per this precedent. Philip Stevens ( talk) 11:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn Mgm| (talk) 09:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Multiple editors have tagged this for A7. Article was cleaned, then spamified. Probably time for an official discussion. Oliver Twisted (Talk) 10:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted as a combination of a7-group and G10. Jclemens ( talk) 05:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply
It's a halls of residence. No need for a breakdown of floor-by-floor summary of such a location on wikipedia, e.g. "on first floor there is the poop bathroom". Oscarthecat ( talk) 09:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 09:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY because it doesn't establish why this intersection is notable. Also seems to confuse Israelis for a single ethnic group when they constitute a nationality. Cordless Larry ( talk) 09:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Stevvvv4444 ( talk) 12:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 18:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable neologism. Urban Dictionary does not a meme make. Ironholds ( talk) 08:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 13:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Advert for non-notable software package. My Google search suggests about 100 installations rather than the 29,000 claimed in the article. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 06:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 07:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Not notable. The information on the expression is not cited, although it sounds reasonable. None of the sources explain anything about it. They just use the expression in one way or another. Northwestgnome ( talk) 06:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete (G3) by Efe. Non-admin closure, THEN WHO WAS PHONE? ( talk) 09:19, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
IMDB does not show a Mark Flores with these credits. WP:HOAX. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 06:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. per WP:SNOW. Mgm| (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
May be a Neologism WP:NEO. This terms seems to have been coined in the book: King Power In Chess by Edmar Mednis. [26]. I can't find a single other reference to this phrase in any other book on Chess or Games on Google, Google Book Search, Amazon, or Yahoo. Oliver Twisted (Talk) 06:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
omg, srsly azimsultan ( talk) 06:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:23, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Phil (rapper) and Phil created by the same editor seem to fail: WP:BIO. Open to discussion. Oliver Twisted (Talk) 05:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy delete as blatant vandalism. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 21:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
It is disgusting that another piece of nonsense from The biggest jimmy has survived for three days. The Topkapi kebab shop is no different from hundreds of similar shops in London alone and its proprietor no more notable than hundreds of others. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 05:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Block creator! Ha, if you were to read through my contributions you'd see some well researched and well written complete articles, why not write your own exclusive encyclopedia purely for your own reference then?
I assume that this must be what the warning about grumpy users that's in the standard user talk page refers to? And that I shouldn't be scared off regardless. I do find it quite a revelation that anyone could be "disgusted" though at an article remaining in place for 3 days? Personally I reserve words like 'disgust' (or equally 'passion') for real world events that are worthy of, and stir genuine human emotion like say violent crime, corruption, love ..etc, maybe it's time to evaluate what percentage of the real world over zealous "policing" of wikipedia is for you. The biggest jimmy ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC). reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Can't find RS. Could be a hoax, or I could have just missed something. Can't decide on notability either way if real. Dloh cierekim 05:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This is a non-notable music autobiographical article that apparently was deleted in the past (see User talk:Stressdadon) and has since been re-created. Wavehunter ( talk) 05:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Individual companies of the Boys' Brigade (or the Scouts) are not notable. — RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 04:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A mixed martial artist: I can not establish competition at a notable level. Contested prod. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? ( talk) 04:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. nonsense El on ka 05:48, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a neologism. Was previously deleted as Cock pushup. Tone of article tries to imply this is valid, medical advice. Oliver Twisted (Talk) 04:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a hoax. Could be A7 but claims to have "invented surround sound" so I'm taking to AFD Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 03:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 14:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Only one ghit, on another Wikipedia page, Efrain Escudero. WP:MADEUP or WP:HOAX. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 03:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Well, its not a hoax, or made up. The term is used quite frequently within the MMA community. Most of the time it is used by MMA sports journalists, and was even mentioned by Mike Goldberg on Spike TV during The Ultimate Fighter finale.
In fact, since that very night there have been many fans wanting to know what The Pima Effect is. Message boards get flooded with this question. So I decided to create an article. Thought I was helping out.
I'm not very good at making articles, sorry if it does not look very good. I'm still editing it to make it look more professional. But you marked it for deletion within the first couple minutes of its creation. So I hadn't had a chance to perfect it yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IcyB ( talk • contribs) 03:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
It was Escudero's wikipedia that popularized the term. No they were being flooded because it was Efrain Escudero who was being featured on Spike TV. Up until that point the term was rarely used. But ever since Escudero got the term mentioned on Live Television people have been asking about the term, and as such it has been used much more frequently. Escudero popularized the term, perhaps because of his wikipedia. I think once the term is actually properly defined, it will be linked to the other fighters.
I don't think a term can be properly added to other MMA fighters wikipedia's until it has one itself. Now that there is a wikipedia for the term, I think it justifies adding the term to the Varner, Fickett, Forbes, Martinez, Roop, Hightower, Pima, and RITC articles.
I am still making the article, I'll add a referance section. Just give me time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IcyB ( talk • contribs) 03:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Mixed drink "invented" in 2008; meets WP:MADEUP. Mr. Vernon ( talk) 02:58, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Snowball keep, withdrawn by nominator. I was not reasing the text carefully, sorry. `' Míkka >t 15:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
A murder case without particular notability explained. `' Míkka >t 02:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
40,000 of 190,000,000 people in Brazil - insignificant. Punkmorten ( talk) 13:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to All Monsters Attack. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 07:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This character does not establish notability independent of All Monsters Attack through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN ( talk) 23:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ORG lacks evidence to prove notability including significant third party coverage. Michellecrisp ( talk) 06:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Was previously deleted in November because it cannot be verified this season is actually in production. Mgm| (talk) 09:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Pure speculation (it's even said in the article). Violates what Wikipedia is not. David WS (contribs) 02:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was merge to Rock Island, Illinois. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article is about a non-notable religous structure. It may become notable in the future, but at present it is not notable. Also, there are no reliable sources to verify claims in the article. Thanks. Ism schism ( talk) 20:07, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Mgm| (talk) 09:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
No Assertion of Notability, can't find any mentions in news sources/notable music sites. \ / ( ⁂) 21:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Non-notable unsigned band - fails WP:MUSIC on all counts. dramatic ( talk) 20:29, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 07:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:NSONGS. Hasn't charted, hasn't won any awards, and hasn't been covered by multiple artists. From an unreleased and as-of-yet untitled album, so I originally redirect to artist. Editors have been edit-warring the redirect, so deletion seems to be the appropriate answer. — Kww( talk) 00:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This individual may or may not be notable enough for an article. I declined the speedy delete request because there is an assertion of notability here. Perhaps the UK editors know more about him than I. JodyB talk 00:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Claim of notability is apparently a championship with a nonnotable wrestling organization. Orphaned; dead-end; unsourced; very little information available on google. Speedy declined. HeureusementIci ( talk) 00:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. The incoming links are indicative of editor collaboration and are the result of this article being listed in a maintenance category. Potential COI by an author of an article alone is not cause for deletion, as long as the article is neutral. Since COI can influence ones editing, it is discouraged, but not disallowed to edit such articles. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 06:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Advert. A look at the incoming links show over 85% from user pages, most interesting. Primary author appears to have a direct connection with this institution, a clear conflict of interest. B.Wind ( talk) 03:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Claims to be the largest VFW in the world. While I have found sources that mention this, they only do so in passing, and I can find no substantial coverage in reliable sources. A claim to notability is worthless if you can't back it up. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 05:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Prodded this as a non-notable ep without realizing it had already been prodded. All other episodes from this show's first season have been deleted, and I don't want to see 100-some eps all redirected to List of Garfield and Friends episodes as it would be pure chaos. I see absoutely nothing that makes this a notable episode; it's an overly detailed plot summary devoid of sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 05:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 18:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete - no reliable sources indicate that this person passes our notability guidelines. Speedy deletion tag improperly removed by the article's creator. Otto4711 ( talk) 11:17, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. – Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Initiating this AfD on behalf of Largoplazo ( talk · contribs). Apparently, because of technical difficulties, this AfD was only partially completed, and the deletion rationale lost. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 16:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Magazine with no assertion of notability. The article's creator has been reported by a bot at WP:UAA. Delete. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 16:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John254 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
One EP on a possibly notable label, plus an LP on another possibly notable lael. Nothing significant in News, no other reliable sources found. Only sources are unreliable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 14:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Original research, no topic exists google scholar search Wapondaponda ( talk) 17:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC) reply
unref'd article about a NN local tv station fails WP:CORP. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn. [35] ( non-admin closure) — neuro (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is about someone who appears to be a rather minor actor and is filled with disinformation. His most notable claim to fame is as a director of the film " Highlander II: The Unholy Alliance" and that he made a cameo in Highlander: The Series as a cavalry captain. In reality all he did was appear in Highlander: The Series as a cavalry captain in the episode "The Unholy Alliance, pt 2". Perhaps he is more notable than I thought and he does have several French language credits, but since I don't speak French I cannot attest to how notable any of them are. A ni Mate 20:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply
In recognition of his study of Minister Paul Barbe (1836-1890), as part of his contribution to the biography of Alfred Nobel by Swedish filmmaker Vilgot Sjömann, Hjärtebarn (Stockholm, 1995), he was rewarded by the creation of a Manuel Bonnet dossier at the Nobel Archives in Stockholm. He worked for Max Lavigne and participated in his latest book: 'Chantecoq'. Royal de la Cité to the Republican Commune (Paris 1996). He is also an author of documentary films. Directed by M. Kapture, ‘Two gendarmes in the Pacific’ (RFO / CINETEVE 2000), which won the Lucien Kimitété award at the Groix Film Festival in 2002. He studied at the prestigious Conservatoire national supérieur d'art dramatique in Paris from 1973. The 'jewelry' entry is completely unproven. imo. Personally, I reckon he's notable enough, but then I am francophile and this is en:wiki Dickie ( talk) 08:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Closing per obvious consensus. — Aitias // discussion 18:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC) reply
Article about a nonnotable actor who never has moved beyond being an extra and playing minor characters. The article also appears to have been created with a conflict of interest. Themfromspace ( talk) 00:11, 23 December 2008 (UTC) reply