The result was speedy delete under criterion A7. No assertion of notability is made, nor is a reliable source provided to verify. (The only source was from blogspot.) — C.Fred ( talk) 22:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Is she notable ? thisisace ( talk) 22:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge and redirect to Uyghur captives in Guantanamo. Any relevant information can be included in that article. There simply aren't the third party reliable sources that single out this individual for notability justifying the article. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I fail to see why this prisoner is notable. Guantanamo Bay detention camp's notability doesn't mean that each prisoner gets their own Wikipedia article. I find it analogous to making an article for each prisoner held at Rikers Island. Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E. brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete (A7). ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This article includes no reliable sources to verify notability, and a google search on this person's name results in a surprising 0 hits. Even I have more google hits than this musician? That's surprising enough to make me suspect a hoax. Prod removed without comment or improvement by creator. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 23:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Daniel 03:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. At first glance it looked like WP:MADEUP, but it doesn't. There are a few relevant ghits, not enough however to establish real notability. Delete, man. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 22:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A girl who made the news for throwing a party that caused damage to her house. True, the event received news coverage, but nothing else has come from it since. 15 minutes of fame are over. Jmlk 1 7 22:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result wasspeedy deleted by Orangemike ( talk · contribs) per WP:CSD#G1. Non-admin closure. -- Dhartung | Talk 06:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Speedy was originally proposed, but the original editor said "Its qualified under fiction but sources and citations will be posted soon." None of the sources make clear what fiction universe this group is from. Accordingly, this is a non-notable fictional group with no sources to verify its existence. Without knowing whose works this group appears in, it's not even possible to redirect it to the article on the book series, etc. — C.Fred ( talk) 22:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep per information that arose since the nomination (non-admin closure) brew crewer (yada, yada) 00:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Assuming that it's notable at this time, there's a WP:NOTNEWS problem. This is a one time conferernce that in a year from now will be forgotten. Nothing in the article suggests that the conference will have a substantial and lasting impact on Latin Alternative music. In addition, that article seems a bit too much WP:SPAMMY. brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete NN actor Mayalld ( talk) 22:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 13:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Doesn't pass
WP:BIO, and no significant coverage found on Google.
Epbr123 (
talk) 22:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep Although notability is usually not inherited, this is clearly an important part of the franchise. Glass Cobra 09:48, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This article is an in-universe plot repetition of plot points from the various Jurassic Park stories, and has no notability or referencing of its own, and as such its just total duplication. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 22:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non admin closure. The result was redirect. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 19:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC) User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Notability. Subject matter is already covered in suntanning and other articles and there isn't sufficient information to justify a seperate article. Pharmboy ( talk) 21:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 09:45, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable "life coach" and activist. Nothing on Google News, only 81 Google hits, and I can't find any that are reliable sources. Corvus cornix talk 21:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. While there is certainly debate about the format, current state, referencing and possibly name of the article (all just requiring cleanup tags and editing) ; the consensus about the subject is to keep - (non-admin closure) Peripitus (Talk) 08:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This was up for WP:PROD. It was proded for the following reasons: "has been tagged unreferenced for well over a year", "does not give year the data was captured" and "numbers are claimed to be unreliable on talk page". I could have just deleted it, but I didn't feel that it was something that could be removed without a full discusion first. That isn't the sort of thing that can simply be proded, imo, because there are many articles (and lists) for which such problems are true, and to delete them all would be ludicracy. I personally don't have an opinion on this; I present it to you to reach a consensus on what to do next. However, I suspect, unless anyone has some great plan, this will require deletion. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:WEB; unsourced. Also: administrator "Can't sleep" redirected this page to Barbie three months ago and was reverted. I think he had the right idea. Also: the original author, Rinku11 ( talk · contribs), has few other edits and may have a conflict of interest. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 21:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 07:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A non-notable actor, known for appearing in one advertisement where he sings one line. The article is entirely unsourced and a google search does not find anything relevant, even when using what I suspect is the correct spelling of his name - Nuku'alofa. The article has a work in progress tag but with the best will in the world, I cannot see this article managing to assert notability.
A previous speedy (by another editor) was denied, therefore it is listed here. Mattinbgn\ talk 21:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
An interesting part about the above comment is the observation that a google search does not find anything relevant. Being a valued member of Wikipedia, I would have thought objectivity in one's analysis of sources would be one of the cornerstones of research.
As useful as the internet -and including wikipedia, may be for such searches, all knowledge, wisdom and information does not reside solely on the internet. Hence, this point should not be taken into account in order to assess the validity of this article.
As this is a work in progress, verifiable sources are in the process of being made available online. Not being able to devote one's time solely to editing new wikipedia articles, this process does take a little time.
Seone, for those in the know, is not only known for one advertisement -even though a high proportion of the population will be familiar with him for this reason. It is for his work with Maori and Polynesian communities in Australia for which this article will build satisfy concerns of notability. In addition to this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lankstar 79 ( talk • contribs) 22:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as nonsense. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
No notability at all, GS returns virtually nothing relevant. Lots of POVl (and OR?) prior to my most recent cleanup edit. Tanthalas39 ( talk) 20:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirected to My December per WP:MUSIC, this can alsways be reversed if it gains independent notability. BLACKKITE 17:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Song is not a single, it is wishful thinking, a page is not required for it Alankc ( talk) 20:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Glass Cobra 09:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete this is premature at best; WP:CRYSTAL, and WP is not a repository of everything that has been, is, or ever will be. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Snowball keep/withdrawn by nominator. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
unecnyclopedic. More of a grammar guide/glossary, which wikipedia is not. For now, it is unreferenced, but although that can be fixed, the article would need a complete rewrite to become encyclopedic. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 20:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:CORP, no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable person; redirected after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guylan Qudsieh but now recreated without any additional sign of notability. While I'm sure the creator will be along to point out that there are many similar articles on Wikipedia, the fact still remains that this person has no notability from sources outside Kid Nation Pak21 ( talk) 20:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Merge or weak keep I dislike reality TV and Kid Nation in particular, but given this shows popularity, I think the information should be kept around. As a note, I'm getting 1,720 ghits, which seems low for anything so popular at the moment. Hobit ( talk) 01:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete unsourced article without any indication why this pencil is notable, per WP:N - no significant coverage in independent reliable sources Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 19:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC) Note: Talk:Wendy Wu 2 re-created and updated. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 14:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
procedural nomination— version at time of AFD nomination: This was previously deleted via expired PROD 29 Aug 2007; that version has been restored as a subpage of this one to allow non-admins access to the content. The present version has at one reliable source versus 0 in the earlier version (the movieweb article is republication of the Variety news item). User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 19:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete until the movie actually exists. Production companies change their minds all the time, and Wikipedia is not into the speculation business. Keeper | 76 21:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Spellcast ( talk) 17:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A reposting of Abdullah Harun, which was speedily deleted on 16 December. No assertion of notability. Fails WP:BIO. The creation of BdJewel ( talk · contribs) a single purpose account Victoriagirl ( talk) 19:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result Was delete -- JForget 01:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. No outside sources. Created by User:Grabbertees ( WP:SPA account. Speedy tag removed Keeper | 76 19:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Speedy delete no way this classifies as advertising/spam. only can see a delete on basis of sources in question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Into everything ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Note: this is User:Into everything's first contribution to Wikipedia.
Comment. User "Into everything" has made his second contribution. Copied from my talk page: you're nuts, delete the page for all i care. the faster the better.
User:Into everything.
Keeper |
76 20:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete all. JERRY talk contribs 01:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Vocal roles in musicals are almost never concretely defined nor is there a set standard for what is a bass, alto, and so on. These lists will accumulate original research and could become quite unwieldily. -- omtay 38 19:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
These other articles are also included in this nomination (for similar reasons):
The result was keep. Singu larity 07:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete contested prod; no independent sources to show that this newspaper is notable. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 07:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Subject meets none of the criteria for biographical notability and the reference cited doesn't even mention the subject and I can find no external verification. This looks like a hoax and should be deleted. Isotope23 talk 19:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete contested prod; unsourced article about someone who, it is claimed without evidence, has some writing credits but is more like a writer's equivalent of a bit-part actor. Fails WP:BIO. So nn that we don't know when or where he was born, red flags of non-notability in modern biographies: we are an encyclopedia, if anyone wants to read a biography here one should expect to see the minimal core biographical details that are missing in this article. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete unsourced article about a nn school or mosque. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 18:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
procedural nomination—This has been PROD-deleted twice since the last AFD. However, the present version is more polished and has a citation versus being rough and without references for the article at the second AFD-deletion. Recommend that if the article is deleted this time, the talk-page be retained with AFD-record attached. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 18:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Singu larity 07:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete No encyclopedic notability proved. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 18:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable self-published book; article written primarily by book author, who
admits that he wrote the article in an effort to get the book made into a movie. Only alleged (and unreferenced) claim to notability is that the book won an award in a writing contest based on the number of words written.
Russ
(talk) 18:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 09:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Independent production with no third party coverage. Fails WP:ATT. Nv8200p talk 18:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This seems to be an unnotable hotel MSGJ ( talk) 18:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7. Nishkid64 ( talk) 19:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete Non-encyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 18:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Kei lana 01:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced for more than eighteen months. Apparently original research. Mikeblas ( talk) 18:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Tyrenius ( talk) 04:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Spammy article on a company with iffy notability. Article creator has removed advert and coi tags without improving the article. He has claimed here that he is not Todd Edwards, CEO of the company, but had signed previous posts here and here under that name. The same editor has also repeatedly created the spam article Reality Rhyming® about the company's main product. Reference list does contain a valid reference or two, but most links are irrelevant. If the article is kept, it should be stubified. -- Finngall talk 18:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm confused. This article follows all of your guidelines exactly. Everything can be verified, it's all factual, significant to the world and not self promoting. The Hallmark Greeting Cards article was even used as a guide to write this one. Please advise and thank you. B
Hammycurls (
talk) 18:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. Hut 8.5 11:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Nearly all unsalvageable trivia that's hard to read. Hardly anything is referenced. Anything we might want to keep can be easily incorporated into the Frog article. See Wikipedia:"In popular culture" articles and Wikipedia:Trivia sections. Phoenix-wiki talk · contribs 17:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
And yes, renaming the article to Cultural depictions of frogs is certainly the way to encourage editors to stop thinking that a collection of examples of frogs in 20th/21st century pop culture somehow magically forms a coherent article when it exceeds some critical mass. Administrator privileges are not required in order to rename articles, either, though. Uncle G ( talk) 21:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 05:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per WP:HEY as Obesity in India. Bearian ( talk) 20:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT#IINFO. You help me decide if I'm right. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 17:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Hut 8.5 17:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I think this article should be deleted and the page name "Saur Revolution" become a redirect to this location People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan#The Saur Revolution. As you can see, currently this article has a 1 sentence summary and a weasel worded, non-neutral, unreferenced statement attempting to approximate why the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. Obviously it would be better to improve this article, but I can't do it and if anyone else was gonna, they'd of done by now. Far better for anyone who types in "Saur Revolution" to be linked to informed, referenced account on the PDPA page, than this, plus if someone in the future comes along and decides they wanna make the Saur Revolution into a full article, they'll be well within their rights to do so :) Ryan4314 ( talk) 17:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment: D'oh, silly me, I probably should've just replaced all the text on Saur Revolution with a redirect to People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan#The Saur Revolution, would been a lot simpler than starting an AFD. I am starting to feel tired lol... Ryan4314 ( talk) 18:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, pretty obvious OR. Glass Cobra 09:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I read the article three times and I still don't know what Visual Networking is. I am, however, pretty certain that this article is almost completely original research. CIreland ( talk) 17:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. This dab page seems to be perfectly fine. Singu larity 22:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A page that lists two games, Template:Mario RPG series also exists, actually does a better job. Fangz of Blood 17:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kurykh 05:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Notability for open source financial package has not been established. Ronnotel ( talk) 17:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Why is this ActiveQuant marked for deletion? It's in the same style and on the same context of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantlib . What is your criteria for notability? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
84.72.98.196 (
talk) 20:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
ActiveQuant:
http://www.gojobs.com/seeker/jobdetail.asp?jobnum=4725486&jbid=1625 http://freshmeat.net/projects/activequant/?branch_id=52197&release_id=267351 http://www.softwareheadlines.com/modules/planet/view.article.php/243436 http://ojts.sourceforge.net/ http://www.ohloh.net/projects/8064/enlistments http://warrenng.blogspot.com/2007_08_01_archive.html http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=85659 http://www.linuxlinks.com/Java/Financial/ http://www.nabble.com/ccapi2-and-activeQuant-f27807.html
http://del.icio.us/search/?fr=del_icio_us&p=activequant&type=all http://del.icio.us/search/?fr=del_icio_us&p=ccapi2&type=all http://del.icio.us/search/?fr=del_icio_us&p=ccapi&type=all
CCAPI2 :
http://www.x-trader.net/cms/articulos/software-y-tecnologia/jsystemtrader_4.html
Presentation at Fosdem 2007 :
http://archive.fosdem.org/2007/schedule/events/lt_ccapi2
http://www.opentick.com/index.php?app=content&event=platforms
http://www.linux-beginnerforum.de/glossary/index.php
I don't agree that it doesn't help to name other projects that have similar coverage or weak references, as this just points out how problematic this delete discussion is. There is so much software out there that is named on wikipedia with less coverage and less significance that i really can't comprehend why exactly this article was marked for deletion. ActiveQuant is on the web, under the former name ccapi2, for more than four years, a time quite some people on the web (including wikipedia editors) spent in high school. Also keep in mind that there should be something like same rules for everyone and do not forget, you (wiki-patrons) attack us and all these small projects, not vice versa.
I also can't understand why user Ronnotel, a user with quite some knowledge in financial aspects is so dense to not see the relevance of activeQuant as the only professional open source trading framework worldwide on the net. I would appreciate some feedback from him on that - i.e. if he knows any other open source algorithm trading framework.
And to raise another point, if we speak about ronnotel's activities on volatility arbitrage ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatility_arbitrage), an article that is listed on his page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ronnotel) as "substantially revised", i clearly can see NOT A SINGLE REFERENCE, this article simply hangs completely in the air. Before arguing to delete articles, please first clean in front of your own door.
One of the main problems to achieve media coverage is the simple and mere fact, this topic is not mass relevant, the total amount of active practitioners of the art of computational finance is small compared to simple programmers worldwide.
Thanks for your offer for discussion.
(ustaudinger, 12/25/2007) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.98.196 ( talk) 15:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 07:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete Non-encyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete So little info that it's almost speedily deletable for lack of context. Probably non-encyclopedic although I have no idea what "Bravofleet" is. Merenta ( talk) 16:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete From what I can see, this is a part of some Star Trek simming group [9]. I don't even think the sim is notable, much less the group or the specific ship. Should be speedied. -- GJD (Talk to me| Damage I've done) 17:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Singu larity 07:04, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unsourced since creation, tagged as such since August, 191 unique Google hits of under 3,000 total, so not a lot of hope for providing those missing sources. Looks like an interesting but not terribly important group. Guy ( Help!) 16:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 07:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - No notability proved by which it can be called that this article is encyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was db-copyvio (http://www.makingmoveslv.com/). -- JLaTondre 13:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Is an article about an organisation which does not state notability. Harland1 ( t/ c) 16:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per WP:DIRECTORY. Glass Cobra 09:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Simply a list of cemeteries in a specific county, fails WP:DIRECTORY and WP:IINFO. Dougie WII ( talk) 16:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 20:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability, reads like an ad/PR piece. Dougie WII ( talk) 15:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge -- Polaron | Talk 18:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Incomplete nomination by an anon. They said: This page is just a list of trivial instances of incorrect usage of Cyrillic characters in English. This is not even remotely encyclopedia-worthy and there are few if any citations. User:71.116.111.167 11:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Dan in Berkeley. Procedural nomination. No opinion is being expressed by me. ➔ REDVEЯS is wearing a pointy red hat 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 06:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This was listed as an A7, but its list of clients -- if true -- makes a claim for notability. Still, delete, lacking reliable sources. Xoloz ( talk) 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Mutant (Marvel Comics). Editors may wish to perform a light merge (though it'll have to be very selective; as the article states "..an exact definition of the term is unclear"). BLACKKITE 10:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Subject is a fictional term from Marvel Comics that was never meaningfully defined in the comics, leaving the article to be original research. The term has no substantial cultural impact, and so all information is going to be in-universe. And, more to the point, it's just not that important a term in comics either. Phil Sandifer ( talk) 15:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, invoking WP:SNOW—Hate to do the snow-fall twice in one day, but it is justified. This was speedy deleted four times before being prodded, which landed it here. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 15:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The subject of this article doesn't meet WP:Bio. There are no references to her other than self-published ones. Merenta ( talk) 14:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, yet another non-notable Internet game. Glass Cobra 09:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I don't know why this article exists almost a year. It only describes a childish Flash game that similar with bejeweled, only to have different icons. It does not assert any notability materials to have its own article here. Not to mention of zero sources in the article which violates WP:V. Dekisugi ( talk) 17:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep -- it's odd how the majority of the content was removed, then the entry was slated for deletion. Perhaps someone simply dislikes this game? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.93.82 ( talk) 20:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. -- Tone 20:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable TV episode nothing more then Plot summary and random trivia. See conversation here about issues Talk:List_of_Charmed_episodes. As far as I can tell nothing has been done to improve articles. Ridernyc ( talk) 21:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There was a clear consensus for deletion. Further, the article has no significant secondary sources. TerriersFan ( talk) 05:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Very non-notable mall in California, turns up hardly any Google hits, much less reliable sources. At 167,089 square feet (!), it falls way short of super-regional status (which, based on AfDs past, I'm finally starting to accept as a criterion for inclusion). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 21:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 09:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
non-notable advertising article AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 20:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Hut 8.5 17:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable TV episode nothing more then Plot summary and random trivia. See conversation here about issues Talk:List_of_Charmed_episodes. As far as I can tell nothing has been done to improve articles. Ridernyc ( talk) 21:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Fails WP:EPISODE and lacks any WP:V sources. Pigman ☿ 20:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable TV episode nothing more then Plot summary and random trivia. See conversation here about issues Talk:List_of_Charmed_episodes. As far as I can tell nothing has been done to improve articles. Ridernyc ( talk) 21:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as a hoax. BLACKKITE 17:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Odd page, not sure if it appears notable. It was tagged for speedy deletion with the claim of being a hoax. I don't know what to do with it, but not sure that it should be speedily deleted, so I've brought it here. I'm neutral. Nyttend ( talk) 13:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Fresno Unified School District. Wizardman 02:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I don't think the mention that Kevin Federline attended this elementary school is enough to make it notable. Dougie WII ( talk) 13:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was garbage. DS ( talk) 23:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, appears to be a hoax coupled with a racist joke. Pagra shtak 13:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:CBALL. Speculation about a yet-to-be-released game, that was apparently announced a week ago. The "sources" consist of a link to a (non-English) poster, and a link to a blog. Neither are WP:V or WP:RS. The article is an unmitigated mess as multiple editors insert and remove speculation and slag each other off for messing the article up. Until such time as there is anything more than fevered speculation about this game, it would be best if there were no article Mayalld ( talk) 13:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment Neither is a link to a non-policy essay. Jtrainor ( talk) 22:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 19:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Easily fails all but one notability requirement of WP:BAND, and the only one that's even close is #5, and that's easily debatable. No third-party references, either, so WP:V is also a concern. Tromboneguy0186 ( talk) 12:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Kei lana (recall) 04:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable band per WP:MUSIC. Prod declined by creator. tomasz. 12:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete nat.u toronto 12:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Notability of Band unclear City warming ( talk) 12:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Singu larity 06:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability; I feel page needs to go through AfD Marcus22 ( talk) 12:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
* Delete Well, the subject matter sure looks impressive. But are two papers from the 1990's and a part-authorship of a book sufficient for an academic? My feeling is not. But I'm happy to be convinced otherwise and would then change my vote.
Marcus22 (
talk) 15:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 06:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ORG and is not notable. Story previously removed belongs on another page as it is more general and notable to the whole scene not just this promotion. Much unsourced info otherwise removed. Notability tag unanswered for two months. !! Justa Punk !! 12:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Glass Cobra 09:16, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I prod'ed this based on what sounds like original research. An early version had little or no content, so someone afterwards tagged it with CSD. The author expanded the article a little more and removed the prod. They also removed the CSD, but at the moment, I can't find a classification for CSD.
Yng
varr 12:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
Nomination Withdrawn User:Uncle G has made fantastic progress on this article. See my comments below, under my earlier (and now struck) comment. Should have added this comment before I added that comment, but I'll keep the strike for audit trail purposes. Sorry for cluttering up your watchlist with two edits! Yng varr 14:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus on what to do. It is probably notable, with some sources to back it up, but needs extensive cleanup. Bearian ( talk) 18:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The article lacks a coherent defintion, that 'neosocialism' would constitute a more or less coherent political tendency of its own. The word 'neo' can be prefixed to virtually any 'Ism', and we can't have an article for every ism that has ever had 'neo' prefixed to it. Soman ( talk) 11:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 23:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
an unreferenced OR essay, rather than an encyclopediatic article. The contents of the Democratic Socialism article clearly illustrate the problems of drawing a npov distinction between Democratic Socialism and Social Democracy. Soman ( talk) 10:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was bold redirect to Yankees-Red Sox rivalry. Non-admin closure. Ice Cold Beer ( talk) 09:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Article is redundant. See: Yankees-Red Sox rivalry Would simply redirect, but is article title implies one game more than a long time rivalry. — Steven Andrew Miller ( talk) 08:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. Singu larity 06:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable
Andareed ( talk) 08:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because they all relate to the article in question:
Andareed ( talk) 08:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Spellcast ( talk) 23:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Notability concerns; Searching for "Carmine Emanuele Cella" brings up approximately 305 ghits. While I could find evidence that he was a special mention at the Ibla Grand Prize, I could either find no evidence of the other competitions at all or not in conjunction with his name. I couldn't find any sources stating he had collaborated with Devia or Pavarotti, or toured with Marco Messeri either. Pirate Mink 07:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, borderline notability and written like a blatant ad. Glass Cobra 08:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Dog breeder; not sure how to judge notability. Was prod, contested on talk page by author. Needs considerable cleanup if notable. Rigadoun (talk) 06:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Snowball keep. I know I've gotten yelled at before for applying WP:SNOW way too swiftly, but this one seems a harmless enough closure to me, especially given the precedent that villages are considered inherently notable. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 19:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete No sources or references. Nothing to show any form of noteability whatsoever. Just as a note, this AfD is a test case-- if it is successful, I will be starting to do group nominations of the hundreds of similar articles like this one, most of which consist of 1-3 lines of text and an infobox and no sources or references. Jtrainor ( talk) 05:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Incredibly notable. Bearian ( talk) 20:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete-- Tone 11:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Trivial list per the precedent established here. Merry Christmas from Sasha 05:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect Rigadoun (talk) 06:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Deleting duplicate of How I Feel (Kelly Clarkson song) Bull Borgnine ( talk) 05:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete This article has no reliable sources, and I could find none after a quick search. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Glass Cobra 08:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This page has been tagged for notability for over a month with no significant improvements in that department. The sources provided are not third-party and thus not reliable per policy A search on Google finds no reliable sources - mainly unofficial strategy guides, various blog posts from people who play the game, and a whole bunch of irrelevant stuff after the first page or so. Most of the article is a rephrasing of the in-game FAQ, and therefore a bunch of statistics about various in-game elements. The last two sections contain entirely unsourceable trivia and /or complete speculation by whoever wrote it. I recommend that this article be deleted in accordance with the above linked policies.
The result was redirect to Hainan Island incident. Merge necessary info at your pleasure. Kurykh 05:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Only significance hinges on his name rhyming with "Wrong Way". All other information are part of Hainan Island incident.-- Certified.Gangsta ( talk) 04:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. Singu larity 06:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable. Created by an actor in siad movie. Also nominating the creator's autobiographical article,
The result was delete. Singu larity 06:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Prod contested by myself. I created this article from WP:AFC; my version was [19]. A subsequent editor changed it to the disambig page it is now. I'm not sure whether the Intex company in my version is notable; please decide on that before you approve deletion. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 04:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. NN game. Not out yet. Fan made. Seems to be made by creators of game. Carados ( talk) 04:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, author's request. (Note that this page was created by a different user.) Pegasus «C¦ T» 11:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
It has served its purpose as a temporary article while the main article was protected. Midnight Q ( talk) 03:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable director. He isn't at imdb, the article itself is actually about the movies, and basically nothing about him. A google search for '"The Culture Wars" "david mcdonald"' comes up with 16 hits. A google search for '"Woodstock Can't Get There From Here" "david mcdonald"' comes up with 20 hits. Corvus cornix talk 03:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl6eRMzf9lo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzbone ( talk • contribs) 04:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable race, no reliable sources, PROD removed. Corvus cornix talk 03:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 19:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested CSD, speedy tagged for notability. Kei lana 03:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted (and salted) under A7 by User:Anonymous Dissident. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 05:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Essentially a long vanity piece for an unsigned metal band that has no releases as of yet. Fails WP:N and WP:MUSIC abysmally as well as WP:V: their only "source" is a Myspace profile. Mr Senseless ( talk) 03:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable new religion. Possibly WP:MADEUP. Few ghits, relevant or otherwise. Delete Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 02:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strongly delete - I can't even guess about what this article is . It looks like a Wisła Kraków squad , but there is also some players names who don't play there.... Bartekos ( talk) 18:25, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Glass Cobra 08:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Borderline notable artist. Kei lana 02:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Seems to be entirely original research, also unsourced VivioFateFan ( Talk, Sandbox) 02:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Singu larity 05:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This article doesn't have any sources, isn't neutral, has an elementary tone to it, and isn't very notable. I can't find any reason why this article should stay. Tavix ( talk) 02:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Glass Cobra 08:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. No context. No WP:RS. I wikified it, which included a link to Red Hook. Another editor assumed one of the NY locations listed on that disamb page is the correct location. however, there is no real indication where on Earth this place is. Unless the original author (or someone who knows for sure) can clarify, the article is worthless. Evb-wiki ( talk) 01:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Apparently it took this AfD for someone to notice that the article was worthwhile and in need of help. Thanks to those who took part in the cleanup. Non-admin closure. --Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 11:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unsourced original research that basically amounts to wishful thinking. Delete. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 01:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 03:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unsourced OR with an attempt at prophesying as well. A PROD tag was inserted only minutes after this article was created, but was quickly removed. There was no follow-up on the newpage patrol's part, but no attempt to address the issues of this article either. The author himself seems to have abandoned this article. Delete. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 01:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I believe itʻs getting a bit wintry here... Singu larity 22:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This is not referenced, no idea if it's just someone's random guess or if it's based in fact. Kei lana 01:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep (withdraw nomination). Obviously notable. Kei lana 13:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
New rapper tagged for CSD, he has charted singles though, so he may be notable. (Note:The singles' chart positions are not referenced) Kei lana 01:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Self-published game with no claim of meeting WP:Notability in article. First several pages of non-wiki ghits are game's own site and lots of forums -- I can't find sources showing notability. Contested prod. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete by WP:SNOW. LOL. Bearian ( talk) 20:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This looks like a hoax. An English author born in Colonus, Greece in the 15th century seemed suspect to begin with, but I can't find anything on Google with his name added to any of his works. Corvus cornix talk 00:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 03:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
One of the indiscrimative lists of loosely related topics, fails WP:NOT#INFO, anyways what indicates a "sidekick", survived a prior AFD because the user didn't give a reason for deletion Delete Secret account 00:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Notability is measured by the presence of multiple independant reliable sources. Neither Alexa nor Google hits are conclusive evidence of notability although they can be useful indications. In this case, the article was nominated on the basis of disputed notability and no-one has established the existance of the required sources. Consensus is measured against policy not headcount. Delete Spartaz Humbug! 23:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The organization is non-notable as a Google News search showed exactly zero results [33]. A regular Google search showed nearly 5,000 results most of which seemed to be user generated and not reliable sources. The article had already been deleted under WP:CSD#G11, but the editor reposted and asked for discussion and more research and I am nominating for AfD in good faith, although this article should probably be deleted per WP:CSD#G4. Cheers. -- Simple Paradox 00:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
My feeling is that if any BDSM publishers at all deserve an article, it's the most popular/significant or oldest ones. This one seems to qualify for all three. Steve Rapaport ( talk) 00:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cool Hand Luke 21:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This article was nominated for deletion 2 months ago, and that discussion closed as no consensus. As shown by the comment to Talk:WikiChristian, and a personal comment to me at User_talk:Andrew_c/archive9#WikiChristian, editors at the time had an interest in DRV (or at least clearly disagreed with the closure). The article has not changed in the 2 months. There are currently one questionable independent source cited in the article. The claim for notability is based on a list of the top wikis generated by Wikimedia. No awards or recognition, no independent media coverage (and therefore it fails WP:WEB). I believe the arguments for deletion at the last discussion are still valid, and I ask the community to examine this issue again (and I ask the closing admin to consider the weight of the arguments instead of simply counting votes). Andrew c [talk] 00:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 02:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This student-produced video does not satisfy the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability, receiving "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" . The student paper may be nominally independent, but it is university-funded and does not meet the standard. There is no way of knowing if the News-Gazette story is non-trivial coverage, since there is no web link to the article, but a single source is almost never considered to be sufficient to demonstrate notability, and certainly does not in this case. The fact that these student videos have been posted by the creators on YouTube and DailyMotion does not show any notability at all. Darkspots ( talk) 00:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete on account of WP:SNOW --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 15:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Article about a high school band that is non notable. Exactly zero hits on Google [34]. Simple Paradox 00:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete under criterion A7. No assertion of notability is made, nor is a reliable source provided to verify. (The only source was from blogspot.) — C.Fred ( talk) 22:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Is she notable ? thisisace ( talk) 22:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge and redirect to Uyghur captives in Guantanamo. Any relevant information can be included in that article. There simply aren't the third party reliable sources that single out this individual for notability justifying the article. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I fail to see why this prisoner is notable. Guantanamo Bay detention camp's notability doesn't mean that each prisoner gets their own Wikipedia article. I find it analogous to making an article for each prisoner held at Rikers Island. Delete per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E. brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete (A7). ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This article includes no reliable sources to verify notability, and a google search on this person's name results in a surprising 0 hits. Even I have more google hits than this musician? That's surprising enough to make me suspect a hoax. Prod removed without comment or improvement by creator. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 23:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Daniel 03:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. At first glance it looked like WP:MADEUP, but it doesn't. There are a few relevant ghits, not enough however to establish real notability. Delete, man. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 22:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A girl who made the news for throwing a party that caused damage to her house. True, the event received news coverage, but nothing else has come from it since. 15 minutes of fame are over. Jmlk 1 7 22:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result wasspeedy deleted by Orangemike ( talk · contribs) per WP:CSD#G1. Non-admin closure. -- Dhartung | Talk 06:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Speedy was originally proposed, but the original editor said "Its qualified under fiction but sources and citations will be posted soon." None of the sources make clear what fiction universe this group is from. Accordingly, this is a non-notable fictional group with no sources to verify its existence. Without knowing whose works this group appears in, it's not even possible to redirect it to the article on the book series, etc. — C.Fred ( talk) 22:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep per information that arose since the nomination (non-admin closure) brew crewer (yada, yada) 00:38, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Assuming that it's notable at this time, there's a WP:NOTNEWS problem. This is a one time conferernce that in a year from now will be forgotten. Nothing in the article suggests that the conference will have a substantial and lasting impact on Latin Alternative music. In addition, that article seems a bit too much WP:SPAMMY. brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete NN actor Mayalld ( talk) 22:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 13:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Doesn't pass
WP:BIO, and no significant coverage found on Google.
Epbr123 (
talk) 22:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep Although notability is usually not inherited, this is clearly an important part of the franchise. Glass Cobra 09:48, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This article is an in-universe plot repetition of plot points from the various Jurassic Park stories, and has no notability or referencing of its own, and as such its just total duplication. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 22:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non admin closure. The result was redirect. -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 19:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC) User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:01, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Notability. Subject matter is already covered in suntanning and other articles and there isn't sufficient information to justify a seperate article. Pharmboy ( talk) 21:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 09:45, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable "life coach" and activist. Nothing on Google News, only 81 Google hits, and I can't find any that are reliable sources. Corvus cornix talk 21:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. While there is certainly debate about the format, current state, referencing and possibly name of the article (all just requiring cleanup tags and editing) ; the consensus about the subject is to keep - (non-admin closure) Peripitus (Talk) 08:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This was up for WP:PROD. It was proded for the following reasons: "has been tagged unreferenced for well over a year", "does not give year the data was captured" and "numbers are claimed to be unreliable on talk page". I could have just deleted it, but I didn't feel that it was something that could be removed without a full discusion first. That isn't the sort of thing that can simply be proded, imo, because there are many articles (and lists) for which such problems are true, and to delete them all would be ludicracy. I personally don't have an opinion on this; I present it to you to reach a consensus on what to do next. However, I suspect, unless anyone has some great plan, this will require deletion. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:WEB; unsourced. Also: administrator "Can't sleep" redirected this page to Barbie three months ago and was reverted. I think he had the right idea. Also: the original author, Rinku11 ( talk · contribs), has few other edits and may have a conflict of interest. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 21:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 07:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A non-notable actor, known for appearing in one advertisement where he sings one line. The article is entirely unsourced and a google search does not find anything relevant, even when using what I suspect is the correct spelling of his name - Nuku'alofa. The article has a work in progress tag but with the best will in the world, I cannot see this article managing to assert notability.
A previous speedy (by another editor) was denied, therefore it is listed here. Mattinbgn\ talk 21:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
An interesting part about the above comment is the observation that a google search does not find anything relevant. Being a valued member of Wikipedia, I would have thought objectivity in one's analysis of sources would be one of the cornerstones of research.
As useful as the internet -and including wikipedia, may be for such searches, all knowledge, wisdom and information does not reside solely on the internet. Hence, this point should not be taken into account in order to assess the validity of this article.
As this is a work in progress, verifiable sources are in the process of being made available online. Not being able to devote one's time solely to editing new wikipedia articles, this process does take a little time.
Seone, for those in the know, is not only known for one advertisement -even though a high proportion of the population will be familiar with him for this reason. It is for his work with Maori and Polynesian communities in Australia for which this article will build satisfy concerns of notability. In addition to this —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lankstar 79 ( talk • contribs) 22:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as nonsense. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
No notability at all, GS returns virtually nothing relevant. Lots of POVl (and OR?) prior to my most recent cleanup edit. Tanthalas39 ( talk) 20:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirected to My December per WP:MUSIC, this can alsways be reversed if it gains independent notability. BLACKKITE 17:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Song is not a single, it is wishful thinking, a page is not required for it Alankc ( talk) 20:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Glass Cobra 09:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete this is premature at best; WP:CRYSTAL, and WP is not a repository of everything that has been, is, or ever will be. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Snowball keep/withdrawn by nominator. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:20, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
unecnyclopedic. More of a grammar guide/glossary, which wikipedia is not. For now, it is unreferenced, but although that can be fixed, the article would need a complete rewrite to become encyclopedic. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 20:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete fails WP:CORP, no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable person; redirected after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guylan Qudsieh but now recreated without any additional sign of notability. While I'm sure the creator will be along to point out that there are many similar articles on Wikipedia, the fact still remains that this person has no notability from sources outside Kid Nation Pak21 ( talk) 20:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Merge or weak keep I dislike reality TV and Kid Nation in particular, but given this shows popularity, I think the information should be kept around. As a note, I'm getting 1,720 ghits, which seems low for anything so popular at the moment. Hobit ( talk) 01:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 03:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete unsourced article without any indication why this pencil is notable, per WP:N - no significant coverage in independent reliable sources Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 19:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC) Note: Talk:Wendy Wu 2 re-created and updated. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 14:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
procedural nomination— version at time of AFD nomination: This was previously deleted via expired PROD 29 Aug 2007; that version has been restored as a subpage of this one to allow non-admins access to the content. The present version has at one reliable source versus 0 in the earlier version (the movieweb article is republication of the Variety news item). User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 19:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete until the movie actually exists. Production companies change their minds all the time, and Wikipedia is not into the speculation business. Keeper | 76 21:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. Spellcast ( talk) 17:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A reposting of Abdullah Harun, which was speedily deleted on 16 December. No assertion of notability. Fails WP:BIO. The creation of BdJewel ( talk · contribs) a single purpose account Victoriagirl ( talk) 19:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result Was delete -- JForget 01:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
No assertion of notability. No outside sources. Created by User:Grabbertees ( WP:SPA account. Speedy tag removed Keeper | 76 19:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Speedy delete no way this classifies as advertising/spam. only can see a delete on basis of sources in question. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Into everything ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Note: this is User:Into everything's first contribution to Wikipedia.
Comment. User "Into everything" has made his second contribution. Copied from my talk page: you're nuts, delete the page for all i care. the faster the better.
User:Into everything.
Keeper |
76 20:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete all. JERRY talk contribs 01:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Vocal roles in musicals are almost never concretely defined nor is there a set standard for what is a bass, alto, and so on. These lists will accumulate original research and could become quite unwieldily. -- omtay 38 19:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
These other articles are also included in this nomination (for similar reasons):
The result was keep. Singu larity 07:15, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete contested prod; no independent sources to show that this newspaper is notable. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 07:11, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Subject meets none of the criteria for biographical notability and the reference cited doesn't even mention the subject and I can find no external verification. This looks like a hoax and should be deleted. Isotope23 talk 19:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete contested prod; unsourced article about someone who, it is claimed without evidence, has some writing credits but is more like a writer's equivalent of a bit-part actor. Fails WP:BIO. So nn that we don't know when or where he was born, red flags of non-notability in modern biographies: we are an encyclopedia, if anyone wants to read a biography here one should expect to see the minimal core biographical details that are missing in this article. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 19:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete unsourced article about a nn school or mosque. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 18:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:52, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
procedural nomination—This has been PROD-deleted twice since the last AFD. However, the present version is more polished and has a citation versus being rough and without references for the article at the second AFD-deletion. Recommend that if the article is deleted this time, the talk-page be retained with AFD-record attached. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 18:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Singu larity 07:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete No encyclopedic notability proved. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 18:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable self-published book; article written primarily by book author, who
admits that he wrote the article in an effort to get the book made into a movie. Only alleged (and unreferenced) claim to notability is that the book won an award in a writing contest based on the number of words written.
Russ
(talk) 18:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 09:40, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Independent production with no third party coverage. Fails WP:ATT. Nv8200p talk 18:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Tyrenius ( talk) 03:57, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This seems to be an unnotable hotel MSGJ ( talk) 18:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7. Nishkid64 ( talk) 19:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete Non-encyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 18:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Kei lana 01:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unreferenced for more than eighteen months. Apparently original research. Mikeblas ( talk) 18:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Tyrenius ( talk) 04:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Spammy article on a company with iffy notability. Article creator has removed advert and coi tags without improving the article. He has claimed here that he is not Todd Edwards, CEO of the company, but had signed previous posts here and here under that name. The same editor has also repeatedly created the spam article Reality Rhyming® about the company's main product. Reference list does contain a valid reference or two, but most links are irrelevant. If the article is kept, it should be stubified. -- Finngall talk 18:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm confused. This article follows all of your guidelines exactly. Everything can be verified, it's all factual, significant to the world and not self promoting. The Hallmark Greeting Cards article was even used as a guide to write this one. Please advise and thank you. B
Hammycurls (
talk) 18:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was Keep. Hut 8.5 11:17, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Nearly all unsalvageable trivia that's hard to read. Hardly anything is referenced. Anything we might want to keep can be easily incorporated into the Frog article. See Wikipedia:"In popular culture" articles and Wikipedia:Trivia sections. Phoenix-wiki talk · contribs 17:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
And yes, renaming the article to Cultural depictions of frogs is certainly the way to encourage editors to stop thinking that a collection of examples of frogs in 20th/21st century pop culture somehow magically forms a coherent article when it exceeds some critical mass. Administrator privileges are not required in order to rename articles, either, though. Uncle G ( talk) 21:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Wizardman 05:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep per WP:HEY as Obesity in India. Bearian ( talk) 20:32, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
WP:NOT#IINFO. You help me decide if I'm right. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 17:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Hut 8.5 17:30, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I think this article should be deleted and the page name "Saur Revolution" become a redirect to this location People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan#The Saur Revolution. As you can see, currently this article has a 1 sentence summary and a weasel worded, non-neutral, unreferenced statement attempting to approximate why the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. Obviously it would be better to improve this article, but I can't do it and if anyone else was gonna, they'd of done by now. Far better for anyone who types in "Saur Revolution" to be linked to informed, referenced account on the PDPA page, than this, plus if someone in the future comes along and decides they wanna make the Saur Revolution into a full article, they'll be well within their rights to do so :) Ryan4314 ( talk) 17:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment: D'oh, silly me, I probably should've just replaced all the text on Saur Revolution with a redirect to People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan#The Saur Revolution, would been a lot simpler than starting an AFD. I am starting to feel tired lol... Ryan4314 ( talk) 18:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, pretty obvious OR. Glass Cobra 09:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I read the article three times and I still don't know what Visual Networking is. I am, however, pretty certain that this article is almost completely original research. CIreland ( talk) 17:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. This dab page seems to be perfectly fine. Singu larity 22:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
A page that lists two games, Template:Mario RPG series also exists, actually does a better job. Fangz of Blood 17:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Kurykh 05:36, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Notability for open source financial package has not been established. Ronnotel ( talk) 17:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Why is this ActiveQuant marked for deletion? It's in the same style and on the same context of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantlib . What is your criteria for notability? —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
84.72.98.196 (
talk) 20:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
ActiveQuant:
http://www.gojobs.com/seeker/jobdetail.asp?jobnum=4725486&jbid=1625 http://freshmeat.net/projects/activequant/?branch_id=52197&release_id=267351 http://www.softwareheadlines.com/modules/planet/view.article.php/243436 http://ojts.sourceforge.net/ http://www.ohloh.net/projects/8064/enlistments http://warrenng.blogspot.com/2007_08_01_archive.html http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?threadid=85659 http://www.linuxlinks.com/Java/Financial/ http://www.nabble.com/ccapi2-and-activeQuant-f27807.html
http://del.icio.us/search/?fr=del_icio_us&p=activequant&type=all http://del.icio.us/search/?fr=del_icio_us&p=ccapi2&type=all http://del.icio.us/search/?fr=del_icio_us&p=ccapi&type=all
CCAPI2 :
http://www.x-trader.net/cms/articulos/software-y-tecnologia/jsystemtrader_4.html
Presentation at Fosdem 2007 :
http://archive.fosdem.org/2007/schedule/events/lt_ccapi2
http://www.opentick.com/index.php?app=content&event=platforms
http://www.linux-beginnerforum.de/glossary/index.php
I don't agree that it doesn't help to name other projects that have similar coverage or weak references, as this just points out how problematic this delete discussion is. There is so much software out there that is named on wikipedia with less coverage and less significance that i really can't comprehend why exactly this article was marked for deletion. ActiveQuant is on the web, under the former name ccapi2, for more than four years, a time quite some people on the web (including wikipedia editors) spent in high school. Also keep in mind that there should be something like same rules for everyone and do not forget, you (wiki-patrons) attack us and all these small projects, not vice versa.
I also can't understand why user Ronnotel, a user with quite some knowledge in financial aspects is so dense to not see the relevance of activeQuant as the only professional open source trading framework worldwide on the net. I would appreciate some feedback from him on that - i.e. if he knows any other open source algorithm trading framework.
And to raise another point, if we speak about ronnotel's activities on volatility arbitrage ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatility_arbitrage), an article that is listed on his page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ronnotel) as "substantially revised", i clearly can see NOT A SINGLE REFERENCE, this article simply hangs completely in the air. Before arguing to delete articles, please first clean in front of your own door.
One of the main problems to achieve media coverage is the simple and mere fact, this topic is not mass relevant, the total amount of active practitioners of the art of computational finance is small compared to simple programmers worldwide.
Thanks for your offer for discussion.
(ustaudinger, 12/25/2007) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.98.196 ( talk) 15:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 07:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete Non-encyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete So little info that it's almost speedily deletable for lack of context. Probably non-encyclopedic although I have no idea what "Bravofleet" is. Merenta ( talk) 16:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete From what I can see, this is a part of some Star Trek simming group [9]. I don't even think the sim is notable, much less the group or the specific ship. Should be speedied. -- GJD (Talk to me| Damage I've done) 17:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Singu larity 07:04, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unsourced since creation, tagged as such since August, 191 unique Google hits of under 3,000 total, so not a lot of hope for providing those missing sources. Looks like an interesting but not terribly important group. Guy ( Help!) 16:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 07:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete - No notability proved by which it can be called that this article is encyclopedic. Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was db-copyvio (http://www.makingmoveslv.com/). -- JLaTondre 13:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Is an article about an organisation which does not state notability. Harland1 ( t/ c) 16:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per WP:DIRECTORY. Glass Cobra 09:32, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Simply a list of cemeteries in a specific county, fails WP:DIRECTORY and WP:IINFO. Dougie WII ( talk) 16:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 20:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability, reads like an ad/PR piece. Dougie WII ( talk) 15:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Merge -- Polaron | Talk 18:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Incomplete nomination by an anon. They said: This page is just a list of trivial instances of incorrect usage of Cyrillic characters in English. This is not even remotely encyclopedia-worthy and there are few if any citations. User:71.116.111.167 11:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Dan in Berkeley. Procedural nomination. No opinion is being expressed by me. ➔ REDVEЯS is wearing a pointy red hat 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 06:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This was listed as an A7, but its list of clients -- if true -- makes a claim for notability. Still, delete, lacking reliable sources. Xoloz ( talk) 15:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Mutant (Marvel Comics). Editors may wish to perform a light merge (though it'll have to be very selective; as the article states "..an exact definition of the term is unclear"). BLACKKITE 10:21, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Subject is a fictional term from Marvel Comics that was never meaningfully defined in the comics, leaving the article to be original research. The term has no substantial cultural impact, and so all information is going to be in-universe. And, more to the point, it's just not that important a term in comics either. Phil Sandifer ( talk) 15:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, invoking WP:SNOW—Hate to do the snow-fall twice in one day, but it is justified. This was speedy deleted four times before being prodded, which landed it here. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 15:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The subject of this article doesn't meet WP:Bio. There are no references to her other than self-published ones. Merenta ( talk) 14:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, yet another non-notable Internet game. Glass Cobra 09:25, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I don't know why this article exists almost a year. It only describes a childish Flash game that similar with bejeweled, only to have different icons. It does not assert any notability materials to have its own article here. Not to mention of zero sources in the article which violates WP:V. Dekisugi ( talk) 17:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Keep -- it's odd how the majority of the content was removed, then the entry was slated for deletion. Perhaps someone simply dislikes this game? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.93.82 ( talk) 20:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect. -- Tone 20:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable TV episode nothing more then Plot summary and random trivia. See conversation here about issues Talk:List_of_Charmed_episodes. As far as I can tell nothing has been done to improve articles. Ridernyc ( talk) 21:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. There was a clear consensus for deletion. Further, the article has no significant secondary sources. TerriersFan ( talk) 05:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Very non-notable mall in California, turns up hardly any Google hits, much less reliable sources. At 167,089 square feet (!), it falls way short of super-regional status (which, based on AfDs past, I'm finally starting to accept as a criterion for inclusion). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 21:24, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Glass Cobra 09:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
non-notable advertising article AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 20:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Hut 8.5 17:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable TV episode nothing more then Plot summary and random trivia. See conversation here about issues Talk:List_of_Charmed_episodes. As far as I can tell nothing has been done to improve articles. Ridernyc ( talk) 21:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Fails WP:EPISODE and lacks any WP:V sources. Pigman ☿ 20:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable TV episode nothing more then Plot summary and random trivia. See conversation here about issues Talk:List_of_Charmed_episodes. As far as I can tell nothing has been done to improve articles. Ridernyc ( talk) 21:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete as a hoax. BLACKKITE 17:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Odd page, not sure if it appears notable. It was tagged for speedy deletion with the claim of being a hoax. I don't know what to do with it, but not sure that it should be speedily deleted, so I've brought it here. I'm neutral. Nyttend ( talk) 13:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Fresno Unified School District. Wizardman 02:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I don't think the mention that Kevin Federline attended this elementary school is enough to make it notable. Dougie WII ( talk) 13:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was garbage. DS ( talk) 23:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, appears to be a hoax coupled with a racist joke. Pagra shtak 13:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 07:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete per WP:CBALL. Speculation about a yet-to-be-released game, that was apparently announced a week ago. The "sources" consist of a link to a (non-English) poster, and a link to a blog. Neither are WP:V or WP:RS. The article is an unmitigated mess as multiple editors insert and remove speculation and slag each other off for messing the article up. Until such time as there is anything more than fevered speculation about this game, it would be best if there were no article Mayalld ( talk) 13:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment Neither is a link to a non-policy essay. Jtrainor ( talk) 22:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 19:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Easily fails all but one notability requirement of WP:BAND, and the only one that's even close is #5, and that's easily debatable. No third-party references, either, so WP:V is also a concern. Tromboneguy0186 ( talk) 12:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Kei lana (recall) 04:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Seemingly non-notable band per WP:MUSIC. Prod declined by creator. tomasz. 12:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete nat.u toronto 12:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Notability of Band unclear City warming ( talk) 12:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Singu larity 06:54, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability; I feel page needs to go through AfD Marcus22 ( talk) 12:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
* Delete Well, the subject matter sure looks impressive. But are two papers from the 1990's and a part-authorship of a book sufficient for an academic? My feeling is not. But I'm happy to be convinced otherwise and would then change my vote.
Marcus22 (
talk) 15:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 06:47, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:ORG and is not notable. Story previously removed belongs on another page as it is more general and notable to the whole scene not just this promotion. Much unsourced info otherwise removed. Notability tag unanswered for two months. !! Justa Punk !! 12:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Nomination withdrawn. Glass Cobra 09:16, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I prod'ed this based on what sounds like original research. An early version had little or no content, so someone afterwards tagged it with CSD. The author expanded the article a little more and removed the prod. They also removed the CSD, but at the moment, I can't find a classification for CSD.
Yng
varr 12:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
Nomination Withdrawn User:Uncle G has made fantastic progress on this article. See my comments below, under my earlier (and now struck) comment. Should have added this comment before I added that comment, but I'll keep the strike for audit trail purposes. Sorry for cluttering up your watchlist with two edits! Yng varr 14:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus on what to do. It is probably notable, with some sources to back it up, but needs extensive cleanup. Bearian ( talk) 18:34, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The article lacks a coherent defintion, that 'neosocialism' would constitute a more or less coherent political tendency of its own. The word 'neo' can be prefixed to virtually any 'Ism', and we can't have an article for every ism that has ever had 'neo' prefixed to it. Soman ( talk) 11:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 23:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
an unreferenced OR essay, rather than an encyclopediatic article. The contents of the Democratic Socialism article clearly illustrate the problems of drawing a npov distinction between Democratic Socialism and Social Democracy. Soman ( talk) 10:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was bold redirect to Yankees-Red Sox rivalry. Non-admin closure. Ice Cold Beer ( talk) 09:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Article is redundant. See: Yankees-Red Sox rivalry Would simply redirect, but is article title implies one game more than a long time rivalry. — Steven Andrew Miller ( talk) 08:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. Singu larity 06:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Not notable
Andareed ( talk) 08:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I am also nominating the following related pages because they all relate to the article in question:
Andareed ( talk) 08:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete. Spellcast ( talk) 23:49, 21 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Notability concerns; Searching for "Carmine Emanuele Cella" brings up approximately 305 ghits. While I could find evidence that he was a special mention at the Ibla Grand Prize, I could either find no evidence of the other competitions at all or not in conjunction with his name. I couldn't find any sources stating he had collaborated with Devia or Pavarotti, or toured with Marco Messeri either. Pirate Mink 07:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, borderline notability and written like a blatant ad. Glass Cobra 08:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Dog breeder; not sure how to judge notability. Was prod, contested on talk page by author. Needs considerable cleanup if notable. Rigadoun (talk) 06:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Snowball keep. I know I've gotten yelled at before for applying WP:SNOW way too swiftly, but this one seems a harmless enough closure to me, especially given the precedent that villages are considered inherently notable. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 19:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Delete No sources or references. Nothing to show any form of noteability whatsoever. Just as a note, this AfD is a test case-- if it is successful, I will be starting to do group nominations of the hundreds of similar articles like this one, most of which consist of 1-3 lines of text and an infobox and no sources or references. Jtrainor ( talk) 05:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Incredibly notable. Bearian ( talk) 20:39, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete-- Tone 11:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Trivial list per the precedent established here. Merry Christmas from Sasha 05:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect Rigadoun (talk) 06:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Deleting duplicate of How I Feel (Kelly Clarkson song) Bull Borgnine ( talk) 05:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete This article has no reliable sources, and I could find none after a quick search. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. Glass Cobra 08:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This page has been tagged for notability for over a month with no significant improvements in that department. The sources provided are not third-party and thus not reliable per policy A search on Google finds no reliable sources - mainly unofficial strategy guides, various blog posts from people who play the game, and a whole bunch of irrelevant stuff after the first page or so. Most of the article is a rephrasing of the in-game FAQ, and therefore a bunch of statistics about various in-game elements. The last two sections contain entirely unsourceable trivia and /or complete speculation by whoever wrote it. I recommend that this article be deleted in accordance with the above linked policies.
The result was redirect to Hainan Island incident. Merge necessary info at your pleasure. Kurykh 05:27, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable. Only significance hinges on his name rhyming with "Wrong Way". All other information are part of Hainan Island incident.-- Certified.Gangsta ( talk) 04:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. Singu larity 06:10, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable. Created by an actor in siad movie. Also nominating the creator's autobiographical article,
The result was delete. Singu larity 06:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Prod contested by myself. I created this article from WP:AFC; my version was [19]. A subsequent editor changed it to the disambig page it is now. I'm not sure whether the Intex company in my version is notable; please decide on that before you approve deletion. Shalom ( Hello • Peace) 04:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:59, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. NN game. Not out yet. Fan made. Seems to be made by creators of game. Carados ( talk) 04:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete, author's request. (Note that this page was created by a different user.) Pegasus «C¦ T» 11:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
It has served its purpose as a temporary article while the main article was protected. Midnight Q ( talk) 03:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:55, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable director. He isn't at imdb, the article itself is actually about the movies, and basically nothing about him. A google search for '"The Culture Wars" "david mcdonald"' comes up with 16 hits. A google search for '"Woodstock Can't Get There From Here" "david mcdonald"' comes up with 20 hits. Corvus cornix talk 03:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl6eRMzf9lo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzbone ( talk • contribs) 04:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:52, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable race, no reliable sources, PROD removed. Corvus cornix talk 03:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 19:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested CSD, speedy tagged for notability. Kei lana 03:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted (and salted) under A7 by User:Anonymous Dissident. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 05:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Essentially a long vanity piece for an unsigned metal band that has no releases as of yet. Fails WP:N and WP:MUSIC abysmally as well as WP:V: their only "source" is a Myspace profile. Mr Senseless ( talk) 03:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Non-notable new religion. Possibly WP:MADEUP. Few ghits, relevant or otherwise. Delete Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 02:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Strongly delete - I can't even guess about what this article is . It looks like a Wisła Kraków squad , but there is also some players names who don't play there.... Bartekos ( talk) 18:25, 18 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Glass Cobra 08:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Borderline notable artist. Kei lana 02:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Seems to be entirely original research, also unsourced VivioFateFan ( Talk, Sandbox) 02:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Singu larity 05:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This article doesn't have any sources, isn't neutral, has an elementary tone to it, and isn't very notable. I can't find any reason why this article should stay. Tavix ( talk) 02:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Glass Cobra 08:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. No context. No WP:RS. I wikified it, which included a link to Red Hook. Another editor assumed one of the NY locations listed on that disamb page is the correct location. however, there is no real indication where on Earth this place is. Unless the original author (or someone who knows for sure) can clarify, the article is worthless. Evb-wiki ( talk) 01:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. Apparently it took this AfD for someone to notice that the article was worthwhile and in need of help. Thanks to those who took part in the cleanup. Non-admin closure. --Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 11:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unsourced original research that basically amounts to wishful thinking. Delete. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 01:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 03:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Unsourced OR with an attempt at prophesying as well. A PROD tag was inserted only minutes after this article was created, but was quickly removed. There was no follow-up on the newpage patrol's part, but no attempt to address the issues of this article either. The author himself seems to have abandoned this article. Delete. Blanchardb- Me MyEars MyMouth-timed 01:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. I believe itʻs getting a bit wintry here... Singu larity 22:41, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This is not referenced, no idea if it's just someone's random guess or if it's based in fact. Kei lana 01:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep (withdraw nomination). Obviously notable. Kei lana 13:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
New rapper tagged for CSD, he has charted singles though, so he may be notable. (Note:The singles' chart positions are not referenced) Kei lana 01:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Singu larity 05:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Self-published game with no claim of meeting WP:Notability in article. First several pages of non-wiki ghits are game's own site and lots of forums -- I can't find sources showing notability. Contested prod. Fabrictramp ( talk) 00:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete by WP:SNOW. LOL. Bearian ( talk) 20:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This looks like a hoax. An English author born in Colonus, Greece in the 15th century seemed suspect to begin with, but I can't find anything on Google with his name added to any of his works. Corvus cornix talk 00:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 03:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
One of the indiscrimative lists of loosely related topics, fails WP:NOT#INFO, anyways what indicates a "sidekick", survived a prior AFD because the user didn't give a reason for deletion Delete Secret account 00:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Notability is measured by the presence of multiple independant reliable sources. Neither Alexa nor Google hits are conclusive evidence of notability although they can be useful indications. In this case, the article was nominated on the basis of disputed notability and no-one has established the existance of the required sources. Consensus is measured against policy not headcount. Delete Spartaz Humbug! 23:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The organization is non-notable as a Google News search showed exactly zero results [33]. A regular Google search showed nearly 5,000 results most of which seemed to be user generated and not reliable sources. The article had already been deleted under WP:CSD#G11, but the editor reposted and asked for discussion and more research and I am nominating for AfD in good faith, although this article should probably be deleted per WP:CSD#G4. Cheers. -- Simple Paradox 00:29, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
My feeling is that if any BDSM publishers at all deserve an article, it's the most popular/significant or oldest ones. This one seems to qualify for all three. Steve Rapaport ( talk) 00:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Cool Hand Luke 21:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This article was nominated for deletion 2 months ago, and that discussion closed as no consensus. As shown by the comment to Talk:WikiChristian, and a personal comment to me at User_talk:Andrew_c/archive9#WikiChristian, editors at the time had an interest in DRV (or at least clearly disagreed with the closure). The article has not changed in the 2 months. There are currently one questionable independent source cited in the article. The claim for notability is based on a list of the top wikis generated by Wikimedia. No awards or recognition, no independent media coverage (and therefore it fails WP:WEB). I believe the arguments for deletion at the last discussion are still valid, and I ask the community to examine this issue again (and I ask the closing admin to consider the weight of the arguments instead of simply counting votes). Andrew c [talk] 00:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. jj137 ♠ 02:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC) reply
This student-produced video does not satisfy the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability, receiving "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" . The student paper may be nominally independent, but it is university-funded and does not meet the standard. There is no way of knowing if the News-Gazette story is non-trivial coverage, since there is no web link to the article, but a single source is almost never considered to be sufficient to demonstrate notability, and certainly does not in this case. The fact that these student videos have been posted by the creators on YouTube and DailyMotion does not show any notability at all. Darkspots ( talk) 00:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete on account of WP:SNOW --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 15:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Article about a high school band that is non notable. Exactly zero hits on Google [34]. Simple Paradox 00:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC) reply