This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Hi. Here before deletion review because, no surprise, I disagree with the AfD outcome.
Hello Star Mississippi, I am a new member of Wikipedia, but I have knowledge of sources and writing without prejudice to any party, but I made a problem a while ago, even though I read Wikipedia's policies, but I did not notice that I had to wait 3 months to review my article in the name Ali Sahib Abushanan, and that my article was converted to the draft space and I did By moving it to the main space because I did not know, however, I hope you advise me whether the article will be deleted or not, and I hope that it will not be deleted, but the laws remain constant, even though I was a center in it, and I apologize and sincerely thank you. Ali.saheb99 ( talk) 20:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Star Mississippi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beach too Sandy, Water too Wet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Make Wikipedia on Animal 2A03:2880:FF:13:0:0:FACE:B00C ( talk) 15:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I am a little bemused by the close on the Sion Jobbins AfD and what happens next. There was only one !vote for merge, so the "merge" close looks a bit like a supervote. Redirect enjoyed greater support and would certainly have been a fair close. Now, as I understand it, you won't carry out the merge yourself, or do I have that wrong? But looking at the page, I would hesitate to carry out the merge either, because in my opinion, the mergeable content about Jobbins already exists on the YesCymru page. But if I simply redirect the page there, someone would be within their rights to suggest I have inappropriately ignored the merge close and redirected instead. Could you provide some guidance please? Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 15:58, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
You're fighting a losing battle. I would have blocked them indefinitely, but I consider myself WP:INVOLVED. However, if they keep it up, I may block them anyway ("In straightforward cases (e.g., blatant vandalism), the community has historically endorsed the obvious action of any administrator – even if involved – on the basis that any reasonable administrator would have probably come to the same conclusion."). Just because they're a kid doesn't mean they should be given more leeway.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Netherzone ( talk) 16:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Star. This is about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/APMEX which you recently closed.
I'd hoped that one could !vote at an AFD without having bad-faith accusations afterwards, but here we have this comment from Lightburst saying that someone "turned up just to take a dump at the AfD" (which is probably directed at either me or scope_creep). I don't think this is consistent with WP:5P4, and the user has previously served a topic ban for battleground behaviour.
Due to various heated discussions between me and Lighburst in the past, it probably won't go down well if I send them a message. So I was wondering if you would consider raising this with them please? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
and we're done here |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi! If you, as an administrator, want to accuse me of a COI on Art and Language I am sure there is a way to do it correctly. I find it extremely offensive when it is made as an unpleasant insinuation and strongly refute it. I believe that you owe me an apology, especially since you refused me an apology and claimed that I don't understand policy. I have checked, and I think you are supposed to " raise the issue in a civil manner on the editor's talk page, which is the first step in resolving user-conduct issues, per the DR policy, " WP:COICOIN ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 18:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Admin notice boardStarted this discussion about your behaviour, [ [1]] ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 00:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC) |
Hi SM. Just FYI: at least according to my nav popup, LOM uses she/her pronouns. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 01:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Star, hope all is well in your world. Would you mind having a look at a situation I'm trying to manage with an editor who keeps removing maintenance tags without resolving the underlying issues, COI tag removed four times, and other tags removed repeatedly. See User talk:L'Origine du monde beginning with the February 2023 section (I suggest reading through their talk page for insight); and at Talk:Art & Language starting with this section: Maintenance tag removal without fixing the underlying issues, and continuing on to these sections: Original research, COI tag (February 2023) and COI tag (March 2023). I know you are very busing here and in real life, so I hate to trouble you with a problem, however I am not one to report others to drama boards and always try to resolve issues through discussion instead. However I'm at my wits end, and am reaching out to get your take on the matter. Thank you in advance. Netherzone ( talk) 21:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you recently deleted seven revisions on Christian influences on the Islamic world as violations of copyright. Thank you for taking the time to patrol copyright violations. Jst as a quick note, the violations were still present in the then-live version of the page when the revdel occurred. I understand that this was an easy mistake to make; I've removed the copyvio and added a tag to request revdel. When you get the change, would you be willing to give that a look? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
I know it was 4+ months ago, but do you happen to remember where the copyvio for this was located? Tool isn't showing a violation, but it does look like it's matching something. Primefac ( talk) 11:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, You recently reverted my edit to 'Annapolis County, Nova Scotia' and I was wondering if you could provide and explanation as to why? Many thanks, ProfAuthor ProfAuthor ( talk) 15:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Star Mississippi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Hannah Corbin".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Greetings. Was kind of curious as to why this discussion Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1121#Problematic editor, darts articles was not acted upon? They are still continuing their problematic behavior. Onel5969 TT me 10:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
We could do with someone uninvolved to close this one, in case you are willing?
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kartiki Gonsalves (3rd nomination) CT55555( talk) 03:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Your close at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#33_AfDs_in_3_minutes. It wasn't the OP who apologized, was it? Or can it mean "Offending Party"? Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 07:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
The Women in Red Barnstar | ||
For your efforts to create and improve biographical articles about women, especially women artists. It is greatly appreciated by me. Thanks for doing your bit to counter systemic inequity on Wikipedia CT55555( talk) 18:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
Editor User talk:BeanieFan11#Garbage Bowl just knocked off the Proposed Deletion you nom'd so I set him a challenge there to add some sources from the multitude... Best, Plutonium27 ( talk) 20:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC) PS. Long time since, ay? (see me user page!)
just popping by, 3 years later. I had lost my pw and didn't have a way to recover it. Found it recently in an old file. Good to see you editing a bit here and there! I don't know that I'll be back around much, but at least now I can be :-) Hope you're well. I'm f-ing DONE with snow. I can't even fathom how I haven't moved away from this tundra yet. Keeper | 76 01:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
I see you closed this AfD as delete and redirect. [2] Is Atd an abbreviation or a typo? I got the impression that the redirect was created because the article has existed since the mid 2000s... is this assumption correct? If so, when does a page become old enough to qualify for this? Or is that a line that gets blurry? I'm just curious. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 01:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Star! Would it be alright if you considered unblocking Maine Lobster from just WP:TEA? I feel that it would be beneficial for them to be able to ask questions there, as long as they don't attempt to answer any. If not that's perfectly fine (i'm not closely following the discussion that led to this pblock), just a thought I had when I saw the pblock. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
So in a couple of minutes you read all of this, completely studied all of the arguments and lines-of-thought presented, wrapped your head around the discussion long enough to see both points of view, researched the links provided, wrote up the delete (or merge, same thing) by deciding that the Delete arguments had a better case even though they cited BLP1E which doesn't apply to this situation (which was, if you recall from your reading, their only argument in favor). And thus deleted the article about the iconic oldest winner in Survivor history. Can you, please, take another look at the discussion and research the use of WP:BLP1E and WP:LPI, its linked back-up which must be met to apply, and consider a reversal of the close, a 'Keep' verdict, or even a "no consensus" verdict which may be most applicable here, thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 04:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
You're not reconsidering the closure, are you? I thought your result was the right decision. Even when Crowley is the oldest winner at the time to this date, I still have a hard time believing a stand-alone article needs re-salvage. The "delete/redirect" votes were more convincing to me than "keep" ones. -- George Ho ( talk) 09:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
a couple of minuteslast night and this morning when I reread it after your notes and I hae come to the same conclusion. Randy, I understand that you feel strongly, but consensus was not with you in this case. My read of those citing BLP1E is that the reason he was in other coverage is because he won Survivor, which brought us right back to not meeting Entertainer/Actor. You'll note I did not close the other Survivor articles as in those cases I had an opinion, but didn't cast a !vote. In this particular case I could read the AfD as a neutral admin and I believe I closed it within policy. If you believe I am wrong-and I'm certainly not infallible-you have my support in filing a DRV since I know we both agree we want the discussion closed correctly. Star Mississippi 10:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
Hi! Can I ask for the recreation of the Lisa Mahood article per WP:REFUND? ( deletion discussion) Many thanks in advance! NoonIcarus ( talk) 14:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
TipsyElephant ( talk) 11:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhodhayam. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — MY, OH, MY! 12:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Majority of the votes were to retain the article. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhodhayam. Without reaching any consensus, you marked as consensus reached and closed it, this is sheer manipulation. Please dont resort to unconstructive edits going forward. Your personal opinions dont have weight on whether to keep or dont keep articles. Fostera12 ( talk) 10:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Star Mississippi,
Since you replied to a discussion on my talk page, I thought I'd check in with you about this subject. When I was a neophyte administrator, I received a talk page message, I can't remember from who, who instructed me in no uncertain terms that I should unlink any mentions of an article subject after I deleted an article. The message was focused on PROD deletions but I took this friendly "advice" as pertaining to any main space article deletion. I never received any pushback about this practice until recently and these instances all involve removing links from articles that are deleted as copyright violations reported at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Some of these articles are on obscure subjects written years ago and I thought it was unlikely that they would be recreated any time soon.
Do you unlink mentions of a subject when you delete a page? I told one editor that XFDcloser does this so that editing tool would have to be reprogramed to eliminate this step. Just curious about where you came down on this subject. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 02:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Deploying an emergency kitten just in case you are feeling bludgeoned at AFD or deletion review and to say thanks for doing the closes, I hope you feel appreciated for what seems like a necessary, important, and mostly thankless task.
CT55555(
talk) 03:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Would you be able to move Category:WWF/WWE King Crown's Champions/King of the Ring winners to Category:WWF/WWE King's Crown Champions/King of the Ring winners. I am unable to find the move button and can't do it myself. I am also the creator of this category. Davidgoodheart
I often read that article to honor their legacy, but the article was deleted and I’d like to know why and preferably have it reinstated 108.31.227.41 ( talk) 23:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Star Mississippi, I work for Hamilton E. James and have a declared COI. I recently posted an edit request on his Talk page. As you have previously edited Mr. James' page, I would appreciate you checking out the request. Thank you! KWray ( talk) 17:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
I was trying to shape this draft up for mainspace and was wondering about Mississippi Parent Choice? Parents can choose their teachers? I found this fascinating. Do we have an entry on it? Is it covered somewhere? Mississippi educational system? Have a great weekend. FloridaArmy ( talk) 21:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Star! Thanks for closing this futile discussion after it had reached its inevitable conclusion. The user is still brandishing the same stick/digging in the same hole on his/her talk-page – including something that looks as least superficially like a legal threat. May I suggest putting a stop to that? (obviously that's not something I should even consider doing myself at this point). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
I wanted to point out that @ Timothy says he did access the paywalled sources, through a free trial, and assessed them as promo/interviews/trivial. JoelleJay ( talk) 00:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Star Mississippi,
I hope you are well. I was doing one of my regular CSD G13 deletions of an expiring drafts and ran into a problem with Twinkle because there was a redirect to the draft from this page. But apparently, this user sandbox had received indefinite full protection. I had never seen an administrator impose that kind of protection on a user page of any kind because it prevents the editor from editing their own user pages. Is there a fuller explanation for doing this? Thanks for any insight you can offer (or remember). Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Whenever you find a chance (no rush), could you please look over this draft User:DGG/Eleazar (painter) and let me know what the next steps would be for David's drafts?
This one was a rescued autobiography from 2009. The artist has had enough coverage in reviews & articles to meet GNG. I've cut all of the original research, and trimmed it back to a short article, with everything sourced now. Was able to use some of the sources from the article on Spanish WP, supplemented with what I could find online. Hard to search for him because he uses a mononym, so many hits were not the same Eleazar. Please advise if you think it's ready for mainspace, or if I should keep plugging away at it, either way is fine by me. Thank you, and hope you enjoy the weekend. It got up to 88 degrees today....weird for mid-April, but it sure was gorgeous and the lilacs in my garden look like they are going to pop open soon! Netherzone ( talk) 01:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
Hi. Here before deletion review because, no surprise, I disagree with the AfD outcome.
Hello Star Mississippi, I am a new member of Wikipedia, but I have knowledge of sources and writing without prejudice to any party, but I made a problem a while ago, even though I read Wikipedia's policies, but I did not notice that I had to wait 3 months to review my article in the name Ali Sahib Abushanan, and that my article was converted to the draft space and I did By moving it to the main space because I did not know, however, I hope you advise me whether the article will be deleted or not, and I hope that it will not be deleted, but the laws remain constant, even though I was a center in it, and I apologize and sincerely thank you. Ali.saheb99 ( talk) 20:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Star Mississippi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beach too Sandy, Water too Wet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Make Wikipedia on Animal 2A03:2880:FF:13:0:0:FACE:B00C ( talk) 15:44, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I am a little bemused by the close on the Sion Jobbins AfD and what happens next. There was only one !vote for merge, so the "merge" close looks a bit like a supervote. Redirect enjoyed greater support and would certainly have been a fair close. Now, as I understand it, you won't carry out the merge yourself, or do I have that wrong? But looking at the page, I would hesitate to carry out the merge either, because in my opinion, the mergeable content about Jobbins already exists on the YesCymru page. But if I simply redirect the page there, someone would be within their rights to suggest I have inappropriately ignored the merge close and redirected instead. Could you provide some guidance please? Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 15:58, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
You're fighting a losing battle. I would have blocked them indefinitely, but I consider myself WP:INVOLVED. However, if they keep it up, I may block them anyway ("In straightforward cases (e.g., blatant vandalism), the community has historically endorsed the obvious action of any administrator – even if involved – on the basis that any reasonable administrator would have probably come to the same conclusion."). Just because they're a kid doesn't mean they should be given more leeway.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Netherzone ( talk) 16:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Star. This is about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/APMEX which you recently closed.
I'd hoped that one could !vote at an AFD without having bad-faith accusations afterwards, but here we have this comment from Lightburst saying that someone "turned up just to take a dump at the AfD" (which is probably directed at either me or scope_creep). I don't think this is consistent with WP:5P4, and the user has previously served a topic ban for battleground behaviour.
Due to various heated discussions between me and Lighburst in the past, it probably won't go down well if I send them a message. So I was wondering if you would consider raising this with them please? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 10:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
and we're done here |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Hi! If you, as an administrator, want to accuse me of a COI on Art and Language I am sure there is a way to do it correctly. I find it extremely offensive when it is made as an unpleasant insinuation and strongly refute it. I believe that you owe me an apology, especially since you refused me an apology and claimed that I don't understand policy. I have checked, and I think you are supposed to " raise the issue in a civil manner on the editor's talk page, which is the first step in resolving user-conduct issues, per the DR policy, " WP:COICOIN ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 18:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Admin notice boardStarted this discussion about your behaviour, [ [1]] ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ ♥ Talk ♥ 00:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC) |
Hi SM. Just FYI: at least according to my nav popup, LOM uses she/her pronouns. Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 01:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Star, hope all is well in your world. Would you mind having a look at a situation I'm trying to manage with an editor who keeps removing maintenance tags without resolving the underlying issues, COI tag removed four times, and other tags removed repeatedly. See User talk:L'Origine du monde beginning with the February 2023 section (I suggest reading through their talk page for insight); and at Talk:Art & Language starting with this section: Maintenance tag removal without fixing the underlying issues, and continuing on to these sections: Original research, COI tag (February 2023) and COI tag (March 2023). I know you are very busing here and in real life, so I hate to trouble you with a problem, however I am not one to report others to drama boards and always try to resolve issues through discussion instead. However I'm at my wits end, and am reaching out to get your take on the matter. Thank you in advance. Netherzone ( talk) 21:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you recently deleted seven revisions on Christian influences on the Islamic world as violations of copyright. Thank you for taking the time to patrol copyright violations. Jst as a quick note, the violations were still present in the then-live version of the page when the revdel occurred. I understand that this was an easy mistake to make; I've removed the copyvio and added a tag to request revdel. When you get the change, would you be willing to give that a look? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
I know it was 4+ months ago, but do you happen to remember where the copyvio for this was located? Tool isn't showing a violation, but it does look like it's matching something. Primefac ( talk) 11:46, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, You recently reverted my edit to 'Annapolis County, Nova Scotia' and I was wondering if you could provide and explanation as to why? Many thanks, ProfAuthor ProfAuthor ( talk) 15:43, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Star Mississippi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Hannah Corbin".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Greetings. Was kind of curious as to why this discussion Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1121#Problematic editor, darts articles was not acted upon? They are still continuing their problematic behavior. Onel5969 TT me 10:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
We could do with someone uninvolved to close this one, in case you are willing?
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kartiki Gonsalves (3rd nomination) CT55555( talk) 03:26, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Your close at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#33_AfDs_in_3_minutes. It wasn't the OP who apologized, was it? Or can it mean "Offending Party"? Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 07:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
The Women in Red Barnstar | ||
For your efforts to create and improve biographical articles about women, especially women artists. It is greatly appreciated by me. Thanks for doing your bit to counter systemic inequity on Wikipedia CT55555( talk) 18:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC) |
Editor User talk:BeanieFan11#Garbage Bowl just knocked off the Proposed Deletion you nom'd so I set him a challenge there to add some sources from the multitude... Best, Plutonium27 ( talk) 20:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC) PS. Long time since, ay? (see me user page!)
just popping by, 3 years later. I had lost my pw and didn't have a way to recover it. Found it recently in an old file. Good to see you editing a bit here and there! I don't know that I'll be back around much, but at least now I can be :-) Hope you're well. I'm f-ing DONE with snow. I can't even fathom how I haven't moved away from this tundra yet. Keeper | 76 01:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
I see you closed this AfD as delete and redirect. [2] Is Atd an abbreviation or a typo? I got the impression that the redirect was created because the article has existed since the mid 2000s... is this assumption correct? If so, when does a page become old enough to qualify for this? Or is that a line that gets blurry? I'm just curious. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 01:13, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello Star! Would it be alright if you considered unblocking Maine Lobster from just WP:TEA? I feel that it would be beneficial for them to be able to ask questions there, as long as they don't attempt to answer any. If not that's perfectly fine (i'm not closely following the discussion that led to this pblock), just a thought I had when I saw the pblock. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
So in a couple of minutes you read all of this, completely studied all of the arguments and lines-of-thought presented, wrapped your head around the discussion long enough to see both points of view, researched the links provided, wrote up the delete (or merge, same thing) by deciding that the Delete arguments had a better case even though they cited BLP1E which doesn't apply to this situation (which was, if you recall from your reading, their only argument in favor). And thus deleted the article about the iconic oldest winner in Survivor history. Can you, please, take another look at the discussion and research the use of WP:BLP1E and WP:LPI, its linked back-up which must be met to apply, and consider a reversal of the close, a 'Keep' verdict, or even a "no consensus" verdict which may be most applicable here, thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 04:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
You're not reconsidering the closure, are you? I thought your result was the right decision. Even when Crowley is the oldest winner at the time to this date, I still have a hard time believing a stand-alone article needs re-salvage. The "delete/redirect" votes were more convincing to me than "keep" ones. -- George Ho ( talk) 09:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
a couple of minuteslast night and this morning when I reread it after your notes and I hae come to the same conclusion. Randy, I understand that you feel strongly, but consensus was not with you in this case. My read of those citing BLP1E is that the reason he was in other coverage is because he won Survivor, which brought us right back to not meeting Entertainer/Actor. You'll note I did not close the other Survivor articles as in those cases I had an opinion, but didn't cast a !vote. In this particular case I could read the AfD as a neutral admin and I believe I closed it within policy. If you believe I am wrong-and I'm certainly not infallible-you have my support in filing a DRV since I know we both agree we want the discussion closed correctly. Star Mississippi 10:52, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
Hi! Can I ask for the recreation of the Lisa Mahood article per WP:REFUND? ( deletion discussion) Many thanks in advance! NoonIcarus ( talk) 14:26, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
TipsyElephant ( talk) 11:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)An editor has asked for a deletion review of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhodhayam. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — MY, OH, MY! 12:30, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
Majority of the votes were to retain the article. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhodhayam. Without reaching any consensus, you marked as consensus reached and closed it, this is sheer manipulation. Please dont resort to unconstructive edits going forward. Your personal opinions dont have weight on whether to keep or dont keep articles. Fostera12 ( talk) 10:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Star Mississippi,
Since you replied to a discussion on my talk page, I thought I'd check in with you about this subject. When I was a neophyte administrator, I received a talk page message, I can't remember from who, who instructed me in no uncertain terms that I should unlink any mentions of an article subject after I deleted an article. The message was focused on PROD deletions but I took this friendly "advice" as pertaining to any main space article deletion. I never received any pushback about this practice until recently and these instances all involve removing links from articles that are deleted as copyright violations reported at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. Some of these articles are on obscure subjects written years ago and I thought it was unlikely that they would be recreated any time soon.
Do you unlink mentions of a subject when you delete a page? I told one editor that XFDcloser does this so that editing tool would have to be reprogramed to eliminate this step. Just curious about where you came down on this subject. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 02:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Deploying an emergency kitten just in case you are feeling bludgeoned at AFD or deletion review and to say thanks for doing the closes, I hope you feel appreciated for what seems like a necessary, important, and mostly thankless task.
CT55555(
talk) 03:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
Would you be able to move Category:WWF/WWE King Crown's Champions/King of the Ring winners to Category:WWF/WWE King's Crown Champions/King of the Ring winners. I am unable to find the move button and can't do it myself. I am also the creator of this category. Davidgoodheart
I often read that article to honor their legacy, but the article was deleted and I’d like to know why and preferably have it reinstated 108.31.227.41 ( talk) 23:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Star Mississippi, I work for Hamilton E. James and have a declared COI. I recently posted an edit request on his Talk page. As you have previously edited Mr. James' page, I would appreciate you checking out the request. Thank you! KWray ( talk) 17:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
I was trying to shape this draft up for mainspace and was wondering about Mississippi Parent Choice? Parents can choose their teachers? I found this fascinating. Do we have an entry on it? Is it covered somewhere? Mississippi educational system? Have a great weekend. FloridaArmy ( talk) 21:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Star! Thanks for closing this futile discussion after it had reached its inevitable conclusion. The user is still brandishing the same stick/digging in the same hole on his/her talk-page – including something that looks as least superficially like a legal threat. May I suggest putting a stop to that? (obviously that's not something I should even consider doing myself at this point). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
I wanted to point out that @ Timothy says he did access the paywalled sources, through a free trial, and assessed them as promo/interviews/trivial. JoelleJay ( talk) 00:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Star Mississippi,
I hope you are well. I was doing one of my regular CSD G13 deletions of an expiring drafts and ran into a problem with Twinkle because there was a redirect to the draft from this page. But apparently, this user sandbox had received indefinite full protection. I had never seen an administrator impose that kind of protection on a user page of any kind because it prevents the editor from editing their own user pages. Is there a fuller explanation for doing this? Thanks for any insight you can offer (or remember). Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Whenever you find a chance (no rush), could you please look over this draft User:DGG/Eleazar (painter) and let me know what the next steps would be for David's drafts?
This one was a rescued autobiography from 2009. The artist has had enough coverage in reviews & articles to meet GNG. I've cut all of the original research, and trimmed it back to a short article, with everything sourced now. Was able to use some of the sources from the article on Spanish WP, supplemented with what I could find online. Hard to search for him because he uses a mononym, so many hits were not the same Eleazar. Please advise if you think it's ready for mainspace, or if I should keep plugging away at it, either way is fine by me. Thank you, and hope you enjoy the weekend. It got up to 88 degrees today....weird for mid-April, but it sure was gorgeous and the lilacs in my garden look like they are going to pop open soon! Netherzone ( talk) 01:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)