- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 03:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
APMEX
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- APMEX ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS. Refs are routine company news, PR, annoucements and press-releases. scope_creep Talk 08:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, and Oklahoma. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment No comment on notability (I didn't look), but this article seems to have WP:UPE and if this company is notable it likely needs a revert to the last good revision without the UPE. Jumpytoo Talk 20:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- The article is a WP:TNT case and needs to go. It is absolute junk of the worst type of brochure article. I will go through the references. scope_creep Talk 21:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst ( talk) 04:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment If they really do have "more than $11 billion in transactions since 1999" surely there would be plenty of business articles written about them somewhere. Dream Focus 04:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete or draftify As per Scope_creep, WP:TNT is needed for this promotional article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 03:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
APMEX
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- APMEX ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS. Refs are routine company news, PR, annoucements and press-releases. scope_creep Talk 08:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, and Oklahoma. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Comment No comment on notability (I didn't look), but this article seems to have WP:UPE and if this company is notable it likely needs a revert to the last good revision without the UPE. Jumpytoo Talk 20:31, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- The article is a WP:TNT case and needs to go. It is absolute junk of the worst type of brochure article. I will go through the references. scope_creep Talk 21:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst ( talk) 04:28, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment If they really do have "more than $11 billion in transactions since 1999" surely there would be plenty of business articles written about them somewhere. Dream Focus 04:40, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete or draftify As per Scope_creep, WP:TNT is needed for this promotional article. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:32, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.