This user may have left Wikipedia. GrapedApe has not edited Wikipedia since May 3, 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hi, thanks for commenting on the August Wilson Center Talk Page. You commented on a comment by one of my students. We are editing wikipedia this semester as a part of a course, and we appreciate engagement from Wikipedians! Aolivex ( talk) 21:52, 31 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Your article, Alpha Gamma is proposed to be deleted. 01001010101010010101001 ( talk) 03:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Welcome!

Hello, GrapedApe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Madcoverboy ( talk) 18:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Madcoverboy ( talk) 18:24, 10 June 2009 (UTC) reply

NYCRuss ☎ 12:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Just curious. The picture you have on the Stonewall Jackson article of a log cabin ..... I was born and raised in this area and I don't know where or what that picture is of. Just wondering. ??????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.14.59.150 ( talk) 03:09, 27 July 2013 (UTC) reply

I've responded to your question on my talk page. -- Midnightdreary ( talk) 22:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of U. Grant Miller Library at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Awadewit ( talk) 17:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Just so you know, generally {{ db-u1}} is only used on pages in your own userspace (for example: User:Thingg/sandbox). {{ db-g7}} or {{ db-author}} (both are the same template) is more generic and it is usually used if the page isn't in your userspace. In practice, it doesn't really make any difference which one you use because they all mean the same thing: ("this is my page. I don't want it any more. please delete it.") but I just wanted to let you know. A belated welcome to Wikipedia by the way! :) Thingg ^{⊕ ⊗} 05:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

• Oh, thank you.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 05:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of WNJR (FM) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Orlady ( talk) 01:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC) reply

On July 18, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article WNJR (FM), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page ( here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen ( talk) 11:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Certainly keep the images, as they enhance the visual appeal of the list. Look forward to seeing more improvements as and when you get the chance. Bencherlite ^Talk 08:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC) reply

[1] [2]

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey there, I'd just like to thank you for doing reviews of featured list candidates. Those two recently didn't go so well, but it is in general a good process. Don't let it get you down! Thanks again, hope to see you around. Jujutacular  ^{T ·  C} 19:14, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Congratulations! Jujutacular  T ·  C 00:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Category talk:Wikipedians by alma mater: Washington & Jefferson College. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{ db-author}}. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{ db-author}} tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{ bots|deny=FrescoBot}} somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot ( msg) 00:46, 17 April 2010 (UTC) reply

On April 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Old Main (Washington & Jefferson College), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist ( talk) 00:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Nice work! I visited the W&J campus a week ago, for the first time; it's definitely a nice-looking campus. Have you ever heard of a building around campus known as the "Sackville House", on E. Wheeling St.? I tried to find it, but my best guess is that it's been torn down and replaced with the new fine arts center. Nyttend ( talk) 03:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the note; however, I did notice the house that you mention. I parked farther east on Wheeling (just barely west of the Wade Ave. intersection) and walked to McMillan Hall, stopping for the Sackville House. I photographed the house that you're talking about, only to notice that it had a different number than the one given for the Sackville House. Nyttend ( talk) 04:17, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply

I still believe that the house is gone. Its National Register nomination form includes a map, but there's nothing specifically marked as being the house on the map on page 5. Moreover, look at the picture; I don't remember seeing this house anywhere along Wheeling, and the shadows on Google Maps' satellite view don't seem to show any such house. Errors such as Canonsburg for the administration building are quite rare; I doubt that there's such a significant error here. I'll be happy if you can show me that there really is an error, and that it's still in existence :-) Nyttend ( talk) 05:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC) reply

It's not the only situation that a landmarked building doesn't stay in existence for long after it's designated: check out Holy Rosary Catholic Church (St. Marys, Ohio), which was listed on the National Register a full year after it was demolished. Thanks for the link to Shorty's; I'm quite impressed by the 23,000 signatures especially. Nyttend ( talk) 12:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC) reply

I was really only concerned with buildings on the National Register, so the only other building that I photographed was McMillan Hall. I did get several pictures of that, so I suspect that they could be useful; I've just not gotten around to uploading them yet. Nyttend ( talk) 03:24, 8 May 2010 (UTC) reply

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The George Washington Hotel (Virginia), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.thegeorgewashington.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 04:48, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, and thanks for your detailed review of this FLC. Can you revisit to ensure your concerns have been addressed, and if possible declare whether you support, oppose, or are neutral toward the list's promotion to FL status? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:19, 29 April 2010 (UTC) reply

On May 5, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article McMillan Hall (Washington & Jefferson College), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for this article Victuallers ( talk) 08:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for all of your help. Your critiques and work helped to earn that star. NYCRuss ☎ 05:12, 7 May 2010 (UTC) reply

User:GrapedApe has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as GrapedApe's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear GrapedApe! Peace, Rlevse 01:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC) reply A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, GrapedApe. Once you add a third-party reliable source to Hays Hall and a reference that states that Frederick J. Osterling is a noted architect, I will pass it. I am referring to the discussion at Template talk:Did you know#Hays Hall. Thanks, Cunard ( talk) 20:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you for adding the reference. I've verified the hook. Cheers, Cunard ( talk) 06:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Pleasure doing business with you.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 06:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC) reply

On May 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hays Hall, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 08:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

On May 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Literary societies at Washington & Jefferson College, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 18:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

On May 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Burnett Center, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers ( talk) 18:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Just a quick note to let you know that I'll hopefully have some time tomorrow to check out the peer review of the above list. Sorry it's taken so long. Lots of real life stuff going on. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:48, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Phew, got there in the end, hopefully my few comments are of use. I look forward to seeing it at FLC. All the best. The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Technology Center at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lionelt ( talk) 07:19, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply

On May 24, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Swanson Science Center, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 18:15, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi: Noticed you recently created the NRHP stub for the East Washington Historic District. I updated the infobox using the Elkman tool. You might consider using the same since it already contains much of what you are entering manually and is based on the NRHP database.-- Pubdog ( talk) 00:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply

• Thanks! That is a really awesome tool!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 03:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply

On May 26, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Technology Center, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 18:03, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, since you seem to be creating a lot of new pages recently (I'm looking through the old college football seasons), you might want to consider applying to be a autoreviewer so that your pages are skipped on new page patrol. Thanks! -- Ricky81682 ( talk) 07:02, 2 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• No thanks, but thanks for offering.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 19:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I honestly wasn't aware of this discussion until after I gave you autoreviewer. So, here are your new duties: continue exactly as you had been doing before. "Autoreviewer" is a misnomer; it should be "autoreviewed". All it means is that you, GrapedApe, are considered someone who can be trusted to not create inappropriate pages (in all namespaces, not just articles)... and that you do it often enough that it's more efficient to just mark them all as 'approved' by default. This gets you out of my backlogs (which are typically +3 weeks long). DS ( talk) 13:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• • Well...as long as it comes with no responsibilities and I don't have to do anything... Thanks for the confidence!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 04:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC) reply

You're welcome. I can't let these things pass me by without having a bit of a look at them! Good work, by the way. The Rambling Man ( talk) 19:03, 2 June 2010 (UTC) reply

OK, I'll try and have a proper look later on. Immediate thoughts are that you're missing accessdates on some of the web references, you might want to think about having the tables sortable by surname and appointment date (not hugely important, probably), and that the key in the notes section might be better located earlier, so we don't have to wait to find out what the symbols mean. Bencherlite ^Talk 07:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Pennsylvania College Cases at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Quasihuman ( talk) 13:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Well, I copied the coding from Portal:Nevada, so you ought to thank Juliancolton ( talk · contribs), in fact! Bencherlite ^Talk 21:45, 9 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of First Presbyterian Church 1793 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! dragfyre_ ʞןɐʇ c 01:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply

On June 11, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pennsylvania College Cases, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on John Canon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 05:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, John Canon, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Canon. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Everard Proudfoot ( talk) 05:56, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello! One of your recent edits on June 12 to the article Washington & Jefferson College added a reference named "carnegieclassifications" (in two places) but did not include the actual source. Would you please revisit the article and add the source you intended? Thanks. - Salamurai ( talk) 16:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• So I did! Thanks for the note!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 16:29, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Schools Barnstar
		For your extensive work improving the Washington & Jefferson College article and ones related to the topic. Niteshift36 ( talk) 15:44, 14 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man ( talk) 16:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC) reply

On June 16, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article First Presbyterian Church 1793, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC) reply

On June 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Canon, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist ( talk) 00:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Congratulations. Could you let me know next time you're going to put an article? I'd like to be in Reno so I could lay a bet. ;) ---- moreno oso ( talk) 00:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I think you "sugar coated" your last summary. I was pretty upset too when it went to AfD but figured we would win and get a laugh in the long run. ---- moreno oso ( talk) 04:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I understand the timeline. But the articles are on a site that is now blacklisted. The blacklisting doesn't exempt certain dates. It simply blacklists the site, period. Niteshift36 ( talk) 04:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The problem is the intermix. Baltimore Examiner, Washington Examiner, SF Examiner and Examiner.com were all under the same company and used the same url, examiner.com. Washington Examiner is still owned by them, but is a separate part of the business. At the same time, there were the same ones currently on Examiner.com writing under that URL too. So not only do you have to parse out which city, but which dates and then decide whether it was a Baltimore Examiner writer or a writer for the Baltimore edition of Examiner.com. It's not as simple as just setting a cut off date. Niteshift36 ( talk) 04:29, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply

There are a few other articles out there like the bio of Jeffrey_Herebener:Mises Institute vanity pages for non-notable academics with WP:PROF and WP:UNDUE problems. One more, that of Jörg Guido Hülsmann has been nominated for deletion, for the same reason you nominated the Herbener article. Bkalafut ( talk) 01:31, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• Thanks, and I agree that this fellow isn't notable. There are a lot of similar pages, and it would be a chore to dig through them all. Please keep me posted.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 03:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Greetings. I came here wondering if you could supply a source for the Date of Death for Chase Clements, as I was unaware of what SSDI was. I see from earlier conversions that SSDI is the Social Security Death Index. So, now I'm intrigued. How does one search the SSDI?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 16:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi. In order to search the SSDI, you just need to go to http://ssdi.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ and fill in the information (advanced search is usually better for common names) and, while you cannot link directly to the results, you can create a convenience link by clicking on the SS-5 Letter link, which gives you this (for George Clements, anyways). Generally it's better to then use the date you find to do a Google news archive search for an obituary, but that doesn't always work (if the obituary doesn't exist or was never uploaded etc.) You might run into WP:BLP problems if you use it for someone who is still thought to be living (since it might be construed to be original research), but in this case, Clements' NFL profile lists him as deceased, so there shouldn't be a problem. Canadian Paul 22:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC) reply

• • Wow, thank you very much! I'm surprised that there isn't an SSDI citation template. Maybe one could be created?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 03:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I just did some searching and, apparentely, there is one! So that should be useful in the future. Canadian Paul 15:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Wow, that's almost exactly the kind of thing I was thinking of. One last question: Is there a more reliable source for the SSDI than rootsweb? Does the Social Security office publish it in an authoritative way? Or is the rootsweb version considered pretty reliable?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 16:54, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

As far as I know, the SSDI is the only way to access the United States Death Master File. As far as reliability, it's just as likely to make a typo or an error as any news report, so if those are considered reliable, this should be as well. Canadian Paul 15:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC) reply

[3] {{ SSDI rootsweb}} <ref name=SSDI>{{SSDI rootsweb |lastname= |firstname= |middlename= |ssn= |accessdate=5 October 2010}}</ref>

Thanks for uploading File:ECAC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:46, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Someone reduced the size of File:WandJseal.png and totally reversed the transparency work that you did. I'm wondering if you would kindly be able to look at File:WandJseal.png again and restore the transparency. Also could you check and see if the shrinking of the image caused any artifacts? Sorry to bother you again...-- GrapedApe ( talk) 21:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

No bother. I re-did the downsample with the transparency intact. By the way, maybe the seal falls into the public domain due to age? For example, according to this, p. 20, the first known use of the seal is from 1902. What do you think? — Quibik ( talk) 22:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

By gum, I think you're right. I'll move it to commons right now! Thanks!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 03:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Sorry for the delay. Yes, I was the creator of the hockey uniform images, as well as the creator of the baseball uniforms and the original football uniforms (which have since been redone). What questions do you want to ask? -- The Silent Wind of Doom ( talk) 17:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC) reply

• Well, yeah, I guess I am the original creator of the template. I've never thought of the templates as works themselves. I edited my original football uniform to make a hockey uniform. The images themselves are not free, due to the logos, etc, but the templates themselves are certainly open to the public. People have already been using my football and baseball templates to make more uniforms and images than my original work. If you need it to be official and all, though: I, the Silent Wind of Doom, herby release my creations, the templates for my uniform images, under CC-BY-3.0. -- The Silent Wind of Doom ( talk) 20:14, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Template Barnstar
		For your consistent contributions and excellent work on helping to improve the Washington & Jefferson template! Jrcla2 ( talk) 16:04, 19 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey GrapedApe,

Sorry that I overwrote your last edit to List of Pennsylvania state historical markers in Washington County. I had a large edit that I hadn't yet saved. All the wikilink fixes that you had made were in my edit, except that I retained the official title of each marker to display on the table. I apologize if I stepped on your toes. I really don't care if the titles stay that way, but that is how I was filling them in for the rest of the PA county marker lists. Thanks for your help. I'm done with Washington County for now, so we won't get our edits crossed further. CrazyPaco ( talk) 23:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Could you please not create one sentence NRHP stubs. Although, I see you've finished with Washington County. If you plan on going back and expanding some of theme, I can point you to where you can get the nomination forms, which are a great source to use in an article. There is plenty of interesting information on these sites if one looks (see Hawthorne School (Canonsburg, Pennsylvania) and the Pennsylvania Railroad Passenger Station (California, Pennsylvania), which I was able to expand). ​​ Niagara ​​ ^{Don't give up the ship} 16:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC) reply

• ???-- GrapedApe ( talk) 16:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Hi GrapedApe. With Niagara's comment here and another's comment at Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Washington County, Pennsylvania, you're running into an issue that some/many frequent NRHP article editors have opinions about. There's been some acrimony, in fact, and there's a wide spectrum of views about when starting new NRHP articles is helpful or not. One extreme could be that no article should be started if it is not Featured Article quality, immediately; the other extreme is that any start is an advance, and helpful. I and most others have viewpoints somewhere inbetween. I believe there's no Wikipedia policy reason why an article should not be started, however, and I for one look at your new articles indexed in National Register of Historic Places listings in Washington County, Pennsylvania as a contribution. I agree with Niagara and others that more in any one article is better, though, so if you can follow Niagara's advice and find your way to add NRHP nomination forms (great references for these), that would be great, though is not required by any absolute rule. There's some instructions meant to help with that posted at wp:NRHPhelp (scroll down to Pennsylvania). I'm not sure how good those instructions are, will try now to use them to further develop one or two of these Washington County articles. Anyhow, thanks for your contributions, and please consider joining the NRHP WikiProject and/or participating at its Talk page(shortcuts wp:NRHP and wt:NRHP). -- doncram ( talk) 18:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC) reply
  • P.S. Hey, i am trying to develop the Beallsville Historic District one a bit more, now, for example, using the NRHP nomination document available for it. Also, I noticed your comment about getting Pennsylvania state staff involved in correcting info about one of the NRHP entries, relative to the NRHP's NRIS system data about the place. That's great. You should know that we have an error note collection system about NRHP errors, at wp:NRIS info issues PA for Pennsylvania items. I have tried corresponding with the NRHP about fixing errors regarding other states, but I don't believe anyone has been working on getting Pennsylvania-related errors corrected. Thanks for working on that one! -- doncram ( talk) 20:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC) reply
    • Thank you for the notes. Frankly, I'm surprised that creating stub articles on obviously note-worthy subjects can arouse such negativity, like this rude comment. I fail to see how creating those stubs--with a reference, a full infobox, and relevant categories--can possibly be a bad thing. Featured articles don't spring fully-formed from the mind of contributors: they must start somewhere. Thanks for trying to explain what the dispute is all about, rather than just being nasty. I'll take a look at the Beallsville article. However, I'll probably steer clear of other NRHP articles, because I'd rather not be harassed by some self-appointed arbiters of protocol at the NRHP project. -- GrapedApe ( talk) 21:13, 25 July 2010 (UTC) reply
      • Please don't be discouraged in article creation. Stub articles aren't ideal, but how many featured articles started out as stubs in the first place? I stubbed the entire National Register of Historic Places listings in Florida about 4 years ago, with basic two to three sentence stubs. I did put in a couple of extra refs in each one, though. Part of the problem with the short-short stubs is that they used to have deletion attempts made on them frequently, due to insufficient assertion of notability. Not as much of an issue now, but it is something to think about, when creating any stub. My philosophy, though, is that articles have to start somewhere, and it's easier to expand something already existing. Some of us don't have the attention span to create extensive and gloriously referenced articles. But stubs can be expanded, that's what they're for. Some of the ones I created have. I'm all about quantity. Oh, and quality too, I suppose. My two pence, for what it's worth. :) -- Ebyabe ( talk) 21:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC) reply
        • Well, I visited to try to explain the rude-type comment, which i thot would be disturbing (and i think it was meant to be). I cannot justify that behavior by another editor. To be clear, I think it is fine that you created the articles, with a reference, etc., as you say, and it is a positive contribution. I wonder, do you have connection to the Washington County area, and would you be able to take and upload pictures of any of these?
        • If you might be interested, one area where I could use some similar help, and where your creating articles would be welcomed, is National Register of Historic Places listings in Fairfield County, Connecticut. I am working there on both creating new articles and also on developing them and adding NRHP nomination document references. There are about 15 remaining red-links there, and I would be very glad if you would start them, and I also believe i can assure you that others would not interfere negatively there. Others have not been bothering me there, and I would surely object strenuously if anyone did interfere negatively. Any which way, thanks again for your contributions. -- doncram ( talk) 15:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC) reply

You have been invited to join the College hockey task force, a task force under WikiProject Ice Hockey. We are dedicated to improving the College ice hockey-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in college hockey and/or your many edits to college hockey related articles. If you would like to join, please visit the task force page, and add your name to the list of active project members. Thank you. Bhockey10 ( talk) 07:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC) reply

• • Sure! Thanks!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 17:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply

On July 29, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Walker (industrialist), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 12:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey GrapedApe, I am the original publisher of the Consus Composite ranking. The discussion for its use has been reopened, so if you want to join in again, feel free. Thanks Zoroastrama100 ( talk) 18:35, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey GrapedApe, if I am the Consus people, why would I expose myself so easily in a public forum? I hope you are smarter than that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoroastrama100 ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply

• Yeah, insulting me is the fastest way to make me agree with you. -- GrapedApe ( talk) 19:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I finally posted the GA review for Washington & Jefferson Presidents football. I have placed it on hold waiting for a few concerns to be addressed. See here for the review. – Grondemar 04:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC) reply

With all significant concerns addressed, I have passed this article as a Good Article. Congratulations! – Grondemar 04:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I am not trying to push the website. Neither am I affiliated with the website as you have indicated. If you continue to do so, I will report you for false accusation and Wikipedia:Harassment. In fact, I will report you once I get a chance from my schedule, for you have accused me of a position and motive for which I do not have. The truth will come out. Zoroastrama100 ( talk) 04:36, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply

• Bogus. You said " I am the original publisher of the Consus Composite ranking" right here on my talk page. -- GrapedApe ( talk) 04:44, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For going above and beyond to prevent Wikipedia from being used for fraudulent purposes. Cheers! — Eustress talk 19:13, 6 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I do not review at GA often and it has been some time since I did a GA review. Because GA reviews are done by just one person, my experience is that there is somewhat more variation in what passes and what does not. If the history were expanded a bit in the modern era, I think it would have a good chance at GAN. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:26, 8 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I'll finish it up and post it either tonight or tomorrow night; I've been burned out on the reviewing end and have been struggling to get them done, I've noticed. Sorry for the delay. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of John McMillan's Log School at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NortyNort (Holla) 10:37, 12 August 2010 (UTC) reply

GrapedApe,

I notice that the administrator User:Phantomsteve seems to have deleted a few of your images ( File:4thavepgh.jpg and File:GatewayCenter.jpg), that you seemed to have taken and were used in, and valuable for illustrating, a couple of Pittsburgh articles. This administrator cited ‎ "(F9: Unambiguous copyright violation: from www.cyburbia.org/forums/showthread.php?t=26389 ("©1994-2010 Cyburbia"))", which seems unusual, because he is citing a copyright violation based on someone posting those photos in a thread on a public message board. Can you verify that these were your photos? I would like to get them restored to Wikipedia. Thanks. CrazyPaco ( talk) 17:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey, thanks for the reply. Don't know how I got the uploader confused. (must have been that they were here) Thanks for setting me straight. It's still strange that the reasoning for deletion was that they were posted on a public message board. The copyright does not apply to the photo, but if wasn't that user's photo, then I guess it doesn't matter. CrazyPaco ( talk) 00:51, 14 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Regarding Conk, yeah, I saw that Cathedral crop thing (btw, I do appreciate you defending it). Honestly though, while I don't like not being attributed, I've pretty much come to the conclusion that those things are going to happen if I'm going to upload images. I've seen my pic of the CoL (and others) on other websites, and there is really nothing you can do about it. That comes with the territory of having it accessible to everyone. I don't like Conk's behavior, but I'd rather have the project take the high road and give him his due process on those images which only would cost a couple of weeks delay. He/she has seemed to have also uploaded what appears to be some legit images. It did happened to me once where I had an image of mine tagged for PUF just because of how it looked. Now that said, I didn't have Conk's track record, but still...and some of my images have been scanned from older developed photos that I have taken so there is no exif, so I guess that is where I'm coming from on this. Hey, btw, great work on all the W&J stuff. Cheers.. CrazyPaco ( talk) 02:10, 28 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey, btw, a simple google image search pulled up the Children's Museum image as a © violation, so yeah, that should be speedily deleted. For the other images, I still think he should be given the opportunity to speak if lacking similar hard evidence. CrazyPaco ( talk) 02:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I'll help you with sifting through Conk's stuff. What exactly would you like me to work on? Do you want me to try to find the original source images for speedy deletion? CrazyPaco ( talk) 03:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I believe I have redone the lead per the review but would like to keep the chess and debate info there. Stan9999 ( talk) 18:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I changed the rankings infobox to the {{ Infobox US university ranking}} per this review but their refs are out of date. It is using 2009 refs. I left a note on the their talk page. It looks a bit odd to enter the current ranking but the ref in the box takes you to an old ranking. Stan9999 ( talk) 13:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC) reply

On 17 August 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John McMillan's Log School, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 18:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I've blocked the user. If he does it again, let me know (providing I'm around, of course :). Also, please archive your talk page. Yes, I'm about the last person who has any right to say that - mine is overdue an archive too - but, anyway... Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm curious: Do you have an easy method for compiling the list of images transferred from here to commons, such as the one you posted at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files by Conk 9? VernoWhitney ( talk) 03:48, 27 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The article The Burnett Center you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Burnett Center for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Jezhotwells ( talk) 16:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC) reply

• Wow. I would've appreciated a hold period to fix the problems.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 02:33, 29 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Before I try adding any more Perry Como statue images--is the one that was not added by me which was originally with the article and subsequently deleted, now acceptable?

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:Singing_statue_of_Perry_Como.jpg

The file on the Russian Wikipedia Perry Como page.

Thanks,

We hope ( talk) 17:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

I contacted Canonsburg Chamber of Commerce and learned there is someone there who does have a copyright on her photo of it that is used for post cards. Every photo I have found elsewhere has some type of copyright issues to it. There is a chance she may give permission for WP to use a photo or photos from the post card(s) on the Perry Como page. Would something of this nature be acceptable? If so, I might need to ask your help in the right way of tagging the image if we get any from the lady.

Thanks again!

We hope ( talk) 20:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

ETA-

You might also let Russian WP know the second photo they show also has issues:

Flickr page for image uploaded by Bosa Nova Baby

We hope ( talk) 20:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Placed on hold so you can address concerns. Thanks. Racepacket ( talk) 18:50, 7 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Thank you for your response. I have now read a number of W&J related articles, and you should be commended for your work. Please look at my responses to your comments. I hope they stimulate your thinking. Racepacket ( talk) 04:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• My research indicates that a "scratch race" or "scratch round" is used to reduce the number of competitors. So you could have it in running, bicycle racing, etc. It is another name for a preliminary round. Could you please check your source to see if it is in fact a separate event or sport? Perhaps the source is indicating an elimination/preliminary round of one of the sports already listed in the sentence? Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 03:45, 10 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• I see your point. I have left a few more comments. Racepacket ( talk) 11:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• I would like to wrap this up. I have now checked the references and went ahead and fixed a few footnotes. I have left more comments, including two in red to make sure that you don't over-look them. Thank you for all that you do to improve Wikipedia. Racepacket ( talk) 10:00, 12 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Two of your fixes had wording issues. I have marked them in red. If we can fix these, I will clear the nomination. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 02:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• One last clean up item re: Fall 2003 and we are done. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 20:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC) reply

• Rather than prolong this, I fixed the 2003 ambiguity and cleared the nomination. Racepacket ( talk) 22:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		For your meticulous work at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Conk 9. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Very much appreciated. :) -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC) reply

I would like to apologize that I never got around to helping you sift through the remainder as you had asked for. But I agree with Moonriddengirl and think you did a splendid job. VernoWhitney ( talk) 18:15, 12 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Re: the Dick Biondi page. Am aware where I can get one with the original owner being WCFL (AM). The station owner (Chicago Federation of Labor) sold the station in 1978; the call letters on the AM band died out in 1987. Am aware that it's a lot harder in the case of living persons, and Biondi fits that category. So before I possibly create issues by this, can you tell me if an image with this type of background would be acceptable for use there?

Thanks!

We hope ( talk) 15:42, 12 September 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Literary societies at Washington & Jefferson College you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Literary societies at Washington & Jefferson College for things which need to be addressed. -- Cirt ( talk) 23:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello GrapedApe. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Pennsylvania Gazette (newsletter), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to journals or newspapers. Thank you. —  Malik Shabazz  ^Talk/ _Stalk 22:05, 22 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, the above article was deleted after AfD but immediately re-created. Apparently it is pretty different from that version (see discussion here), so G4 is not possible. As you were invoilved in that AfD, I thought I should notify you. -- Crusio ( talk) 14:06, 26 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Susquehanna University seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:42, 30 September 2010 (UTC) reply

dude it is total vandalism why did u delete my article? Georgian Shepherd Dog ...

Many thanks for your comments on Grand Valley State University. If you have some spare time, perhaps you could review Cornell University. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 00:45, 1 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Yeah, I'll take a look at it within the next few days.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 07:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Why open a peer review when we are looking for someone to do the GA review? Racepacket ( talk) 21:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Why request a second GA, 3 days after the first one failed? Why ask for my help, when you have already requested a new GA review? -- GrapedApe ( talk) 01:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Because we worked around the clock for 3 days address the comments of the GA. I was hoping that you would volunteer for a new GA review, because there is a shortage of reviewers. Racepacket ( talk) 21:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Thank you for doing the peer review. Could you possibly volunteer to do the GA review? A large number of people worked on it as the WikiProject Universities collaboration of the month and it would be nice to bring the process to a close. Racepacket ( talk) 05:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Holy Family University seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk 03:56, 1 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey, could you provide the URL that the image is a copyvio of? Also, you might like to use {{ db-f9}} for image copyvios, but it doesn't make much difference. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Well, the file description says "Copyright: Washington University," so I thought that finding the URL was superfluous. -- GrapedApe ( talk) 19:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• I noticed you deleted the Mark Wrighton photo. Just so you know that was from a Army page (Army is under the Department of Defense). I am almost certain this is fair-use because it is under the purview of the US Government. NorwalkJames ( talk) 17:28, 3 October 2010 (UTC) reply

...but I altered a few of your PROD rationales very slightly for the deletion log. I expanded "NN" to "non-notable" for the benefit of any newbies who might stumble across the log entry in future. Also, if I could trouble you to use an informative edit summary for PROD nominations, it would be much appreciated. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• You're right. Thanks!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 03:09, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I think puttting the entry on the possibly non-free list was the right thing to do. I noticed a couple of inadvertent mistakes in your description, one of which in particular you might want to fix (and the other, as long as you're there anyway). The more important one is: The date is given as "early 20th century," but that's very helpful. I think you meant not very helpful - no? The other is you just forgot a space between further and complicated. I wouldn't bring it up if it weren't for the first. I would have changed them for you, but I didn't want to be presumptious.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:10, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Yes, you're right. Thanks-- GrapedApe ( talk) 14:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I am sincerely sorry that I removed the AFD notice you put on the page Alexander_Henderson_Award before the discussion is complete. I wasn't aware that AFD discussions take place on separate pages and removed the AFD notice because I couldn't find a reason for why it was put up. After I realized how it works I have tried to contribute to the discussion.

Again, I am sorry for having made that mistake. I won't do it again.

-- Buldri ( talk) 23:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I cleaned up the photo, you can download the free program I used at http://www.gimp.org/downloads/. I works like photoshop but is free. If you like helping to identify photos, the Library of Congress is crowd sourcing 50 images a week at Flickr Commons. See: http://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/sets/72157603624867509/with/3294668043/

Thanks for uploading File:Indiana Ice Miners.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk 04:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC) reply

You had begun to review 1997 Michigan Wolverines football team at Wikipedia:Peer review/1997 Michigan Wolverines football team/archive1. It took our copyeditor two months to complete this very lengthy article. Would you consider resuming your review at Wikipedia:Peer review/1997 Michigan Wolverines football team/archive2.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 22:44, 7 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The PR was closed because I opened it before the bot closed the FAC. If you want to comment there it would still be helpful.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 05:40, 9 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I think I've got nothing else to add to that article, but thanks.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 05:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Usp-logo-colour-full.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I know this is a bit out of your comfort zone, but I started a GA review of M-6 (Michigan highway) and there seems to be a difference of opinion with the author over how much explanatory material should be included to make the article self explanatory. I would appreciate a second set of eyes reading the article to see whether it should be clarified, particulary with respect to who designates roads as a part of the National Highway System and the use of exit number designations. I would appreciate if you could spend a couple of minutes looking it over. Thanks. Racepacket ( talk) 13:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Thanks. I love you too?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 21:39, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey, I have nominated this article for deletion because club hockey teams do not generally meet levels of notable for inclusion. You are welcome to comment. Grsz ¹¹ 14:14, 18 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I just think there is no harm in including that article in wikipedia. Looking forward to the Washington County landmarks article. CrazyPaco ( talk) 02:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Duncan & Miller Glass Company at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

Minor pedantry I'm afraid! Please notify me on my talk page when you have commented at the DYK page. Ta, Bigger digger ( talk) 20:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC) reply

You understand photo copyright law, so I'm deferring to you. I was wondering if there's any chance that the photo on this page of Danny Heater as a 17-year old basketball player can be legally used? It would be for Heater's article, of course. Jrcla2 ( talk) 13:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Saint Joseph's University seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

ADDITION: Saint Joseph's has specified that the seal only be used on certain legal documents and that the official logo is the crimson and white "SJU" that was previously there. Please change it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.161.140 ( talk) 12:38, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC) reply

On 26 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Duncan & Miller Glass Company, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Susquehanna University seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Susquehanna University seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Washjeff hockey logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Duncan & Miller Glass Company you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Duncan & Miller Glass Company for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Aaron north ( T/ C) 03:31, 1 November 2010 (UTC) reply

		The Geography Barnstar
		For creating the Washington County History & Landmarks Foundation article, an excellent contribution to the coverage of historic landmarks. CrazyPaco ( talk) 06:14, 13 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Category:The American College (Bryn Mawr, PA), which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 16:24, 15 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Because it needs a justification to use it since it is not free to use based on copyright law. This is proved for articles, but it is not OK in categories. Vegaswikian ( talk) 02:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC) reply

User:Jackandbecksmom uploaded File:Griffin.gif and used the rationale that he is the copyright holder of the work, which is patently false. The College of William & Mary has its copyright ( [4]). Could you request a speedy delete? Jrcla2 ( talk) 14:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC) reply

You worked hard... and it is difficult to get people to review the article... I have an idea of what you go through, because I recently spent some time in developping the French article on the University of Heidelberg ( Université de Heidelberg).

I read it quickly through and I have a few comments I'd like to discuss with you first. In some case I find the history very detailed, for example, William E. Slemmons apparently did not do much, so I would not expect to find him in the main article. On the other hand I think Relations with the city of Washington belongs to the history of the university. -- Anneyh ( talk) 17:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I see that you tagged a number of images (mostly related to brass Rat) as possible Copyvios. However, I don't see that you notified the uploader of the image. In some cases, there may be a simple answer, for example, if the creator of the image was a member of the ring committee, it is not impossible that the creator also added the image to the MIT page. I'm like to hear from some of them before deleting, but they haven't been informed.-- SPhilbrick T 15:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply

You are continuing to tag images without informing the uploader. Courtesy indicates that you provide a notification.-- SPhilbrick T 23:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC) reply

• • I did notify the uploader: [5].-- GrapedApe ( talk) 04:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for letting me know. Of course Munkyfest did represent "all significant views that have been published by reliable sources." . Guess you had to be there. ;) Tubefurnace ( talk) 21:31, 5 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe – a few things to note regarding W&J football coaches.

1. I upgraded the W&J football coach navbox per new WP:CFB standardization. While doing so, I noticed that you never put R. LeBlanc Lynch in List of Washington & Jefferson Presidents head football coaches, even though the 2007 W&J football media guide lists him as the first coach spanning from 1891 into part of the 1892 season.
2. In the coach navbox, I listed J. J. Clark as an interim head coach, because according to the 2007 media guide, he was the head coach for only 4 games in 1892. If Lynch is listed as the head coach for 1891 and 1892, this (to me anyway) signifies that Clark was an interim. If you disagree please raise the issue and we will try to hash it out.
3. I happened to find that there is a mention of R. LeBlanc Lynch in the article St. James Episcopal Church (Amesbury, Massachusetts). I would be stunned if the Reverend and the football coach weren't one in the same. I was thinking perhaps this might interest you in creating his article (if you can find the sources)? Anywho, that's about all for now. Cheers! Jrcla2 ( talk) 13:59, 16 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:York College Pennsylvania seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 05:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:York College Pennsylvania seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you for catching and correcting my removal of the YCP seal from its article. Danielklotz ( talk) 17:38, 18 February 2011 (UTC) reply

While I appreciate that for most of the social fraternities that changing the link from Washington & Jefferson College to Greek organizations at Washington & Jefferson College makes sense, Alpha Phi Omega is not mentioned at all in that Greek Organizations page. Since you seem to have an interest in the page (or at least mentioning the page on your personal page), I thought I'd talk to you before reverting since adding Alpha Phi Omega to the Greek Organizations page would also be a solution. Having said that, there are probably other schools with pages in Category:Lists of chapters of United States student societies by college where they mention Alpha Phi Omega and thus the link makes sense. Naraht ( talk) 10:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Since it is in Category:Lists of chapters of United States student societies by college which is a subcategory of Category:Fraternities and sororities. All of the other entries in Category:Lists of chapters of United States student societies by college are not in the parent category. I was using hotcat. Naraht ( talk) 20:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC) reply

• I see. Good enough for me. Thanks.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 23:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC) reply

I have reviewed some of your articles. Comments are currently being taken on my GA reviewing at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Racepacket 2. Thanks, Racepacket ( talk) 02:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC) reply

The article Alpha Gamma has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wuh Wuz Dat 23:03, 10 April 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpha Gamma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Gamma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wuh Wuz Dat 00:40, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alpha Gamma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Gamma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wuh Wuz Dat 15:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:AMCClogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 04:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Moravian College seal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 04:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I've got four photographs that are clear copyright violations: File:Jimmy McNatt 39-40 Oklahoma.JPG, File:Jimmy McNatt Hank Luisetti 41-42.JPG, File:Jim McNatt 44-45 P-66 team.JPG, File:AAU All-Americans Gruenig McNatt Carpenter.JPG. The uploader claims he took the photos and is releasing them into the public domain...hmm I doubt that very much. Can you please have them deleted? Jrcla2 ( talk) 00:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Butler University seal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 04:50, 24 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:AMCClogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I deleted this as a routine, non-controversial (I thought) housekeeping deletion; the only content was a bot-generated resolved tag. Why do you ask? -- Anthony Bradbury ^"talk" 11:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I have restored this page as requested; there is very little contained therein. -- Anthony Bradbury ^"talk" 11:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I used your name in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive243#Topic ban proposal re NRHP stubs, a discussion at the Administrative Noticeboard, and I believe I am required to notify you. -- do ncr am 15:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I see your respectful restore, but four cites, all from Fiji publications, seems first excessive, and second both redundant and derivative. How about we go with the best, and you (or someone) finds a non-Fiji reference that could support, or better, replace, it? Let me know before I restore my edit, as four are overkill for a general purpose encyclopedia, not a Fiji history page at a Fiji specific or Greek Org website. Yours. Wikiuser100 ( talk) 11:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC) reply

NB: Response to your last at my Talk. Cheers. Wikiuser100 ( talk) 00:11, 13 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Category:Alvernia University, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of 184 38th Street at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 20:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC) reply

On 29 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 184 38th Street, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that 184 38th Street in the Lawrenceville neighborhood of Pittsburgh is the oldest known log house to be used as a residence in any major American city? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 16:04, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Forrest Douds.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 08:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello. In the last peer review, you said that you were going to nominate it for FA. Are you any longer willing to do it? I would help if needed. TGilmour ( talk) 03:10, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Point Park U logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 07:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply

On 30 July 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wigman House, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Wigman House, which has been named a City of Pittsburgh Designated Historic Structure, is the last remaining mansion from Carrick's "Millionaire's Row"? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd ^{The muffin is not subtle} 03:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC) 18:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe, I just wanted to let you know that I added {{ W&Jcats}} to this Template for Deletion discussion. The reason I'm doing so is because I was unaware that Template:Category tree existed, which in my opinion seems to be the most concise and user-friendly approach to sorting categories. Feel free to contest the deletion, but I wanted to drop you a line. Jrcla2 ( talk) 19:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC) reply

• That's fine. Besides, I copied that template off of your W&M one.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 00:11, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply
  • Yeah I realized that, ultimately I decided it was kind of junking up the W&M categories, but I didn't want to touch the W&J one since it seemed to work well for you. Well hey, as long as the cats are all navigable, ya know? Jrcla2 ( talk) 00:46, 8 August 2011 (UTC) reply

Template:W&Jcats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jweiss11 ( talk) 02:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC) reply

yes is does link to the state university system because it is explaining what a state university is. In fact Rutgers is one of the specific examples used in the state university system article. it's just a helpful link. tyvm Pudge MclameO ( talk) 13:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Was this edit a mistake of some sort? Anomie ⚔ 02:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC) reply

• Yeah, not sure what happened there. Thanks-- GrapedApe ( talk) 02:43, 25 October 2011 (UTC) reply
  • I had been attempting to clean up the FURs of school logos (including File:Seton Hill University seal.png). I think I made a copy-and-paste error.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 02:49, 25 October 2011 (UTC) reply

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello GrapedApe! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Thanks for uploading File:Adphilogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Theta Delta Chi crest.png. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster ( talk) 04:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Tau Phi Sigma crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 17:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Greetings. A brief note of acknowledgment of your seeking to move a disagrement over content at the Mother of Fraternities article towards a resolution this past May 16th. I'm sorry that I did not contribute to the discussion at that time. I found the behavior of user 71.106.150.61 so frustrating that it resulted in a six month hiatus from Wikipedia just to chill out.

I see the article reverted to its inadequately supported state in the wake. I'm not interested in banging my head against the wall with that user again. If anything ever works out for the best, do drop a note. Thanks. Wikiuser100 ( talk) 17:03, 17 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Regarding [ this], which reference uses the word "sinister?" I searched diligently, but must have missed it.--~ T P W 23:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Never mind, I see I'm not alone in my assessment of the wording.--~ T P W 13:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, GrapedApe, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touched: The Jerry Sandusky Story whether the article Touched: The Jerry Sandusky Story should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Touched: The Jerry Sandusky Story, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Kansan ( talk) 02:59, 22 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi, you may wish to comment as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Tech Alumni Association (2nd nomination). Thanks-- TM 20:30, 2 December 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shorty's Lunch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shorty's Lunch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Night of the Big Wind _talk 01:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello GrapedApe. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of MC Lars discography, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this is a discography og a notable artist - A7 cannot apply. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 17:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Babyboom (EP), a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. I just wanted to give you a heads up. While the referenced article did not indicate importance and/or significance, it was not applicable for deletion under the A9 criteria for speedy deletion, due to the existence of the artist's article. In these situations, the general response is to redirect the article to the artist article, in accordance with the guidelines at WP:NALBUMS. If you have questions, feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cind. amuse (Cindy) 20:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. I hope you don't mind, but I've contested the PROD on Henry Schmieder Arboretum - I'm really not sure on notability standards for parks and gardens, but there do seem to be some Google hits out there, so it's not obvious that it can't be improved. I'm actually not sure either way, but I think it would really need a discussion at WP:AFD in order to delete it -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 14:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply

• Cool.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 15:03, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I have opened a peer review for Kappa Kappa Psi. I would appreciate any insight you can provide! LazySofa ( talk) 06:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. Just to let you know, I've removed the speed deletion tag from GetCITED because it does make a claim of importance : "It indexes over 3,000,000 publications from over 300,000 authors." Also it has already been the subject of an AfD the result of which was no consensus; this would suggest that deletion is potentially controversial and therefore it is not a good candidate for speedy deletion. -- Mrmatiko ( talk) 13:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC) reply

• Good point. Didn't realize it had an AFD. My bad.-_ GrapedApe ( talk) 02:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited CiteSeer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Repository ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Alpha kappa omega.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 06:24, 21 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Sorry to say, due to an editor being logged out accidentally, I had to suppress your revision as well. Your text is still there in the live page, but not removing your edit would have made the suppression of the preceding edit useless. I wanted to lea e you a note to explain that although your edit was oversighted, you did absolutely nothing wrong, and your edit just got caught as "collateral damage" to protect another user's privacy. Please contact me if you have any questions. Courcelles 03:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:The Triple Helix logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC) reply

I'm wondering about your proposed deletion of the above file. It was uploaded from Flickr, with a free license 4.5 years ago. Unfortunately, the free license cannot be checked NOW, because the original photog is no longer on Flickr. It seems to me that the uploader probably followed the rules as they existed 4.5 years ago, and that if you had wanted to check the license you had plenty of time to do it earlier. Best to AGF now. Smallbones ( talk) 04:22, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply

• So, your argument is that Wikipedia should host content without any evidence that it is freely licensed...because it probably is OK?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 04:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply
  • No, I am simply stating that the file has been OK for 4.5 years, it was uploaded in Good Faith (probably according to the rules then in force). It seems to me that you've missed your chance to challenge the license. Otherwise, rules can be changed and enforcement practices shift, resulting in the possible deletion of ANY file on Commons. Nobody wants that , do they? Smallbones ( talk) 14:04, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply
    • HOw do you know that the file has "been OK" for 4.5 years?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 14:54, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply
      • Certainly the file was unchallenged for 4.5 years. I'll remove the speedy deletion template you put on at Commons. If you want to make a case for deletion, please put it up for regular deletion proceedings. Smallbones ( talk) 15:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply
        • It's not on commons.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 15:33, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply

The use of the helmets taken from either http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/index.htm or http://nationalchamps.net/Helmet_Project/ cant be justified under fair use, your will see from Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 December 11#File:LSU Helmet.png the helmet element (not the logo) part image IS replaceable, just go to any game and take a free picture (then make a Fair use claim for the logo element) , and in cases where the logo is not copyrightable as in the case of File:North Texas.png (as it only contains letters) there is no need to make a fair use claim. Mt king ^(edits) 19:43, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply

• Thanks, but I already made my opinions known.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 22:30, 2 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Graped, my understanding of copyright and trademark law and Wikipedia policy is that Wikipedia requires CC-By-SA released images. Irregardless of the team/school logo, the helmet drawing is the problem here in that helmet image itself isn't released for commercial use. Using it in WIkipedia is a copyright violation of the helmet project website that created it as it has not been released it by CC-By-SA. Also, in the case of the Pitt football helmet, for instance, it isn't actually a copyrighted or trademarked logo of the football team so fair use doesn't apply (only "Pitt" is trademarked). It is also replaceable since one could get a photo of any of these helmets (unfortunately, I don't have the current helmet for pitt, although I have two older helmets) or draw our own helmet. None of any other team's helmet images have survived deletion requests and most have now been deleted. CrazyPaco ( talk) 06:42, 4 January 2012 (UTC) reply

I've got Pirate's page on my watchlist at the moment, and I saw you posted this: [6] However, there are no such pages and no such images at commons. ← Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for fixing. Yeh, that historical marker photo looks like a ripoff, unless he can prove he himself took the picture. The second one is a campus building, and suspicion might be raised simply because of the first one. No ripoffs allowed! ← Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

The only google image occurrences I'm seeing of that ECU building are wikipedia mirror sites and wikipedia itself. Still, he's got some 'splainin' to do. ← Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 13:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Yeah. The 3 year exif data inconsistency is enough to convince me.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 14:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC) reply

FYI. Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance#PGPirate. PGPirate thinks you're hounding... -- Onorem ♠ Dil 08:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply

• Archive at Wikipedia:Wikiquette_assistance/archive114#PGPirate.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 14:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello Graped Ape, I would like to petition for the undeletion of the photo you removed from Christian Keiber. The notes explain there is no credit on the photo. I know Christian Keiber and he gave me his head shot to post. How do I credibly make it clear that it is ok to be posted? He owns the headshot and it is not necessary to credit the photographer. Thanks, Joe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsantandrea ( talk • contribs) 14:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, I've updated the logo for Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC with File:Childrens Hospital of Pittsburgh Logo.svg, so I've listed yours for deletion. Thanks for the original contribution! Best, Weatherman1126 ( talk) 06:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC). reply

Thanks for uploading File:Mercyhurst College logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 06:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Shorty's Lunch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Germantown, Pennsylvania ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

The article Household Name Records discography probably should have been included in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Household Name Records. Any chance you'd agree to delete discography as well?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 17:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Can't really do that as it wasn't explicitly included, but I've PRODded it. Stifle ( talk) 17:16, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

I didn't notice you had PROD'd Georgetown University Alumni & Student Federal Credit Union until after it was deleted without discussion, so I'm requesting undeletion. There are a decent number of sources available, and while being the oldest, largest, and most successful doesn't automatically confer notability, those things don't hurt.-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 19:12, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

• I understand, but respectfully disagree: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgetown University Alumni & Student Federal Credit Union (2nd nomination).-- GrapedApe ( talk) 22:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC) reply

A single-purpose account claims to have taken File:Sulaimon Duke NIL Signing.jpg, which is clearly ripped from here. Speedy please? Jrcla2 ( talk) 15:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

• Done. You know I love these.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 05:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Thanks for doing that. I may have mentioned it before but I don't really dabble in the photos portion of Wikipedia/Wikimedia too much, so I leave it up to those who know what to do to ensure everything is a-ok. Jrcla2 ( talk) 13:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Category:Washington & Jefferson College administrators, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 07:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I noticed you have been making a number of edits, such as this, indicating judges to territorial courts where "state" judges. This is incorrect, they were all Federal judges appointed by the President of the United States. The territorial courts in turn were similar in organization to the now defunct United States circuit courts. -- Allen3  ^talk 20:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply

• I see. I will fix that.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 21:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply

  Of the three names you gave, I am 100% certain that Ethelbert Patterson Oliphant was a federal appointee (the Arizona Organic Act, my primary basis of comparison, references Washington's organic act for details of how the territorial government was to be organized). The same is almost certainly true of the other two, but I do not know enough details to make such a statement with complete certainty. The general rule is that U.S. territories in the 19th century elected their legislatures and a Delegate to Congress while governors and territorial supreme court justices were presidential appointees. -- Allen3  ^talk 23:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC) reply

  • • Thanks. Moved them.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 03:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Point Park U logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 17:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hey GrapedApe. Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swallingwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) •  talk 19:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Chris Mosley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Anselm ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe! Would you be interested in reviewing the Doon School page here:- Wikipedia:Peer review/The Doon School/archive1. We are seriously working/improving/editing this article to make it a Good Article. It's the first potential good school article from India. Thanks! Merlaysamuel ( talk) 17:13, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply

-- Jenith ( talk) 09:59, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply

		The Copyright Cleanup Barnstar
		For tackling the PGPirate Copyright investigation. Means a lot seeing more users helping out in that area. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Millcraft Industries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Wagner ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited E. Henry Knoche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bethany College ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Peirce College logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 04:47, 9 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Lambda Chi Alpha coa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 05:49, 17 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Game Over: Jerry Sandusky, Penn State, and the Culture of Silence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Morrow ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:48, 23 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Becky's Fund, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Hghyux ( talk to me)( talk to others) 02:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC) reply

• SRLSY?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 02:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC) reply

GrapedApe, the question you asked in the DeWayne Lewis AfD, regarding whether Lewis had ever appeared on a regular season NFL roster was answered in the negative. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeWayne Lewis. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 04:15, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your recent articles, including Pittsburgh Dad. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 05:17, 13 May 2012 (UTC) reply

I left comments on the Wikipedia Law Project about the article. I added a little information but did not want to go too far as you are the originator of the article requesting additional input. If you do not mind, I would like to expand the article to include a heading of "Membership Information." This should get the ball rolling on the article. P.S. I am not watching your talk page so you will need to leave any reply on my talk page -- Morning277 ( talk) 14:42, 14 May 2012 (UTC) reply

Made a few more changes this morning. -- Morning277 ( talk) 12:59, 15 May 2012 (UTC) reply

You have replaced the undue section / details with no support from other users for the content at all in the BLPN discussion - your alterations have done imo nothing to address the weight issues - please remove it and return to discussion on the noticeboard and seek consensus support - thanks in advance - Youreally can 04:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC) reply

• I have always been willing to discuss the article at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Looking for input on Jeffrey Docking. What is the issue with it? -- GrapedApe ( talk) 11:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello GrapedApe. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Babar Luck, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. —  Malik Shabazz  ^Talk/ _Stalk 03:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC) reply

I've declined your speedy in view of the age of the article, as I feel it should be dealt with at AfD. As a result, it's at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/President's House Association. Peridon ( talk) 12:28, 23 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Couple of things in regards to the article. 1) Yes, I agree it needs secondary sources. 2) Is there are a reason that this article got a 7 days to establish notability rather than a formal AFD? Naraht ( talk) 11:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Sort of as an aside, you may want to add Delta Iota Kappa to your sweep... Naraht ( talk) 16:27, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Definitely.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 02:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello GrapedApe, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Phi Beta Epsilon, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Press coverage is sufficient to pass A7, can be taken to AFD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- Selket ^Talk 16:46, 12 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Bah, sorry for the auto-template, but yeah, I think AfD is the place for this. -- Selket ^Talk 16:46, 12 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello GrapedApe. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chi Alpha Nu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The sorority is 80+ years old. Thank you. Guerillero | My Talk 13:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Wilson College.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm writing to ask you if you would provide some feedback for Kappa Kappa Psi's featured article candidacy at its FAC page. It has received some comments, but will need more to determine consensus. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Sycamore ( talk) 23:43, 16 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello, Could you provide some guidance about what else would need to be included in the Susquehanna University lead section to adequately summarize the content? It seemed similar to what other universities are using. Thanks. SUCrusader1858 ( talk) 20:19, 19 July 2012 (UTC) reply

- GrapedApe doesn't like to add, only delete. Even things that are acceptable on other universities' pages. ^{citation needed}-- 166.203.56.75 ( talk) 00:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kappa Gamma.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:25, 26 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Check your Wikipedia email:

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 00:46, 28 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Just letting you know. Thanks! Fomeister ( talk) 22:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for catching that link - I'm afraid I spend so much time on different wikis that I have trouble remembering when to add the interwiki part.  :( -- Philosopher  ^{Let us reason together.} 00:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC) reply

I don't know if your edit was proper or not. I'm new here so I may just be misinformed, but the PROD page says that when a page with PROD on it is nominated for speedy deletion, the PROD tag should remain in case the speedy deletion is rejected. Obviously your edit does not do that, but my edit to add PROD was under the same rationale, i.e. if speedy is rejected then PROD remains. What is the proper course of action here, do I need to watch that page in order to PROD it if it is not speedily deleted? or what? -- RHSN ( talk) 23:44, 4 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello GrapedApe. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sigma Phi Beta, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. —  Malik Shabazz  ^Talk/ _Stalk 02:53, 5 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Beta Sigma Zeta.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply

I reverted to a copyvio-less version of the article. I'd personally prefer an AFD, but you can re-add the tag if you wish.  Ryan  Vesey 05:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC) reply

I've declined speedy, preferring to take it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamma Psi Lambda. It's been around a long time, and no-one's challenged it before. I agree that it's time they did. Peridon ( talk) 10:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Just letting you know that, following a request at my talk page, Sigma Alpha Kappa has been undeleted. You may wish to take it to AfD if you still believe it should be deleted. Best, Jenks24 ( talk) 10:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC) reply

On 23 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Roberts House (Canonsburg, Pennsylvania), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Roberts House in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, built in the 1790s, is the last remaining building from Jefferson College? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Roberts House (Canonsburg, Pennsylvania). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 —  Crisco 1492 ( talk) 00:02, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Sorry - completely messed that up. Porterjoh ( talk) 22:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply

• That's cool.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 23:12, 23 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe. Really nice job creating Kevin Benson, so please don't take offense to the cleanup I did. I am a writer and just wanted to improve on the great work you did in starting the article. The minor rewrites of some of the existing content was in no way a violation of close paraphrasing. It was simply clarifying and improving on what you wrote. If you have concerns about any specific edits, please feel free to let me know what they are. That's a better way to deal with it than simply making a wholesale revert of every edit, which is like throwing out the baby with the bathwater. ;) Here are a few examples of the issues I saw:

• Describing him as "prominent" is POV.
• DuBois was spelled incorrectly.
• You said it was the "Sunday" morning program that was expanded to "Sunday", instead of Saturday expanded to Sunday.
• Lori Savitch is not notable, so no mention of her name needed.
• Saying his switch from weekends to weekday mornings was a "promotion" is POV/interpretive. It's not sourced.
• People bringing food to the station is just not important; the important point is that Benson was on-air all weekend because of the storm.
• Impassable was spelled incorrectly.
• We can't say it became the defining moment of his career (which is a conclusion), but we can certainly say that it was described (per the source) as the defining moment in his career. The attribution is vital in that instance.
• Being a grand marshall in a local parade is not worthy of inclusion. It's just not important at all (in the context of an encyclopedia).
• Rob Owen is not notable, so no mention of his name is needed; only the fact that he's a P-G reporter is needed.
• You had the typo "pomition promotion" in the article.
• Bloomberg's little blip about Benson's weather prediction is simply not important.

Again, I'm very glad you created the article. -- 76.189.108.102 ( talk) 05:25, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Please see WT:WikiProject_National_Register_of_Historic_Places#WLM_Android_App_from_WMF

Smallbones_{( smalltalk)} 03:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is " Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Steeler_Nation.23Criticism". Thank you! Quoting: EarwigBot Forwarded by: Marketdiamond ( talk) 06:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Conflict Kitchen at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{ db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot ( talk) 07:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC) reply

On 8 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Conflict Kitchen, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Conflict Kitchen, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is a take-out restaurant that only serves food from nations with which the United States is in conflict? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Conflict Kitchen. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 08:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC) reply

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kappa Kappa Psi crest.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC) reply

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Derogatory slurs injected into NFL fanbase and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Marketdiamond ( talk) 04:56, 14 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks! We probably need to get some more people to have a look at that AfD. I'm almost certain the two Keep votes are from the same person but there's not much point starting an SPI... Maybe worth getting someone to re-list it (again!). Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 03:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC). reply

(Re:) Sure, will do. Stalwart111 (talk) 03:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Sigma Lambda Alpha.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC) reply

On 24 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article East End Brewing Company, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that demand for beer from Pittsburgh's East End Brewing Company spiked after the Pittsburgh Steelers won Super Bowl XLIII? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/East End Brewing Company. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber ( talk · contribs) 00:03, 24 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, i am bored and stuck somewhere so browsing more widely than usual, and i went and noticed your draft rfc question about false colors. I don't know what you plan, but for sake of the new NRHP / WLM contributor of three pics in Montrose, Colorado, and for sake of precedent about newbies, i hope you will not advance a big rfc on basis of those pics alone. Unfair, unproductive to single out for tons of attention, IMHO. If there are other instances so it is not focussed on this one user and on my personal reaction to include/use those 3, which i might not do again, then I'd say go ahead. About those 3 pics, I would argue the guy gets credit for trying something and we should KEEP the photos, under a grandfathering-in type reasoning. I did think they were neat, not knowing how easy the effect is to create; i would probably personally judge differently in future. My 2 cents to share, as i am killing time. Really glad to see you active, by the way. Cheers. -- do ncr am 17:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC) reply

• Thanks for the friendly note, but I think that I'm going to move forward with the RFC. I think that with the WLM coming up, this is a discussion that ought to be had.-- GrapedApe ( talk)
  • Okay, fair enough. There did seem to be interest on part of several other NRHP commenters, I have to grant. Thanks for understanding this as meant as friendly. -- do ncr am 15:26, 26 September 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Franklin Seal.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:25, 6 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:American College Header.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:CliqueVodkaLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:20, 21 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Greeting! Just to let you know, I concur with the removal of the prod for this article. Do you homework next time, you'll get a bad reputation if you don't! Cheers.-- Milowent • ^{has spoken} 02:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC) reply

• [7]

Hello, GrapedApe. I would appreciate it you would not refer to me as a "dickhole" in a comment summary. You may refer to me as a "goddamn douchebag fucktard" if you wish, but some people don't like such language on wikipedia. Something to keep in mind. Cheers!-- Milowent • ^{has spoken} 04:42, 27 October 2012 (UTC) reply

• When you make a dickhole comment on my talkpage, I can summarize your dickhole comments in my own edit summary any way I please as I delete the aforementioned dickhole comment. You should feel free, if you are so inclined, to fuck off, but that is up to you. Best wished and most expensive felicitations to you. -- GrapedApe ( talk) 15:08, 27 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Silent No More: Victim 1's Fight for Justice Against Jerry Sandusky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballantine ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:19, 6 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thaddeus Mortimer Fowler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC) reply

You may want to look at this again, while you are right the username of the uploader does match the person who added the file, the details say the file was created by a "Sandra Aaron". Mt king ^(edits) 03:59, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I declined your CSD nomination on The Hangovers. I'm hoping the nomination was just a mistake, but if it wasn't and you would like to discuss my reasons for declining it, please let me know. Monty ₈₄₅ 22:50, 27 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Back in August you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider taking it to AfD. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 11:06, 1 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Harcum College seal.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Sigma Phi Delta Coat of Arms.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labor ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:03, 10 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hillsdale College alumni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sambo ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC) reply

A proposal has been initiated on the Drew University talk page regarding how notable alumni, faculty, and presidents should be listed. Feel free to join the discussion. DavidinNJ ( talk) 17:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:ASGA logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:06, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply

The article Dozen Bake Shop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local bakery, with no claim to actually doing anything other than bake stuff, no claim to why it is notable outside of it's location, it has received local coverage, as you would expect for a local business, the only non-local coverage is a Washington Post blog post, which is more about the then owner James Gray and how he set it up.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 23:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC) reply

I will take this to AfD - its a local Bake Shop is not Encyclopedic. LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 23:28, 2 February 2013 (UTC) reply

I see this was marked for "orphan" recently . . . I added it here Pittsburgh_culture#Foods_and_drinks and here Portal:Pittsburgh/On_this_day/December_26, hope this helps. ^{Market St.⧏} _{⧐ Diamond Way} 21:54, 22 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 00:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe! Thanks for your hard work with the Pittsburgh articles, though I would appreciate clarity and/or compromise on the Nathan Harper III data here: Talk:Nathan Harper. Thank you. ^{Market St.⧏} _{⧐ Diamond Way} 21:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC) reply

I think you need to review WP:CSD, and WP:N before proposing any more articles for speedy deletion. I've undone 2 of your requests today, and I see a few more that others have done in your contribution history. In the most recent one, Emocapella, the article sites 4 separate independent reliable sources; as long as those sources do actually discuss the group, that's more than enough to meet WP:GNG, much less to pass the "assertion of importance" requirement of CSD #A7. Plus, the article's been on Wikipedia for over 6 years; it's highly unlikely that CSD will apply. Looking at your talk page I see a number of other pages that you've tagged have been declined. Please note that improperly nominating a large number of articles for speedy deletion is disruptive, and can have negative effects on other contributing users. If you have questions about how the criteria work, feel free to ask, but please don't do any more nominating that isn't more carefully thought out. Qwyrxian ( talk) 09:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC) reply

• I don't agree that those had "credibly indicate[d] the importance or significance", which is an important part of the CSD criteria that you conveniently did not quote. Nonetheless, I recognize that I apparently have a quicker trigger finger on CSDs that most. In the future, I'd appreciate you refraining from describing a difference of opinion as disruptive, which is an action that is itself disruptive.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 15:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC) reply

An article which contains multiple references in valid reliable sources is never a valid CSD, because we already know the article meets notability requirements. "Being discussed in a reliable source" is itself a credible claim of importance. It may or may not be enough to meet WP:GNG, if you could show they weren't the subject of detailed discussion, but that would need an AfD to sort out. Remember, CSD exists only for the absolutely most obvious cases, as a way to speed up the deletion process for articles that basically everyone would agree are deletable. Differences of opinion are fine, but that doesn't mean you can just nominate anything you like. I'm merely trying to point out a matter of concern, as there is real harm done when articles that obviously pass muster are nominated for deletion. Keep in mind this is coming from someone who is generally labeled a deletionist. Qwyrxian ( talk) 16:01, 24 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Because the nominator of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Register Information System and the page's creator have just been interaction-banned, I've closed this discussion. Because it's not fair to participants like you to force you to start all over again, I've reopened it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Register Information System (2nd nomination), and I've copied your comments over there. Feel free to participate further over there. Nyttend ( talk) 13:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC) reply

• OK.-_ GrapedApe ( talk) 22:13, 12 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Could you kindly join in and give a helping hand in assessing and progressing. A well reasoned assessment with reference to Wikipedia policies & guidelines would clearly be needed. I feel that the deletion discussion would have been slam-dunk case if the papal election frenzy and the Media circus would not have entered the scene. Arguments like I "feel" so and so is unfortunately a notoriously difficult assessment tool and not always agreeable with encyclopedic sentiments. A bad example of a non-convincing argument from the discussion in question is: Well what utter crap! I'm a reader of Wikipedia and I found myself at this article because I wanted to know about the likely candidates, and a useful article I found it. Well I don't care whether it meets whatever "core policies" you're talking about, but I do care whether it provides me with information I need. And it does, so cut the crap about deleting it.

What arguments i.e. policies & guidelines do you think are most convincing or/and could some be left out?

So far these points have been cited as relevant :

KEEP

WP:GNG (cited once)

DELETE

WP:CRYSTAL

WP:OR

WP:V

WP:NOTADVOCATE

WP:NOTOPINION

WP:RNPOV

WP:COMPREHENSIVE

WP:IRS

WP:FRINGE

WP:NOTGOSSIP

WP:NEWSORG

WP:YESPOV

WP:WEIGHT

Which is it?

Thank you for taking a look at all of this! -- Pgarret ( talk) 14:00, 14 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Courtesy notice to let you know that an Afd you participated in, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yale College Democrats, has been brought up in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 March 18. Cheers! Location ( talk) 19:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC) reply

• More than related to an Afd I participated it, that DRV contained allegations of bias against me. Cheers!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 01:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC) reply

You're right. I should have pointed that out, too. Sorry! Location ( talk) 03:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC) reply

It's all good. Not annoyed at you, just annoyed.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 03:23, 19 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe, do you plan to add the content from the article to the parent company's article now? If not, you should revert this and put the article up at WP:Afd, IMO.-- Biologos ( talk) 15:14, 19 March 2013 (UTC) reply

• Oh, I should, should I?-- GrapedApe ( talk) 03:07, 20 March 2013 (UTC) reply

• I reverted your changes for you now. Please discuss the notability on the discussion page if you don't agree.-- Biologos ( talk) 09:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC) reply

• Well done!-- GrapedApe ( talk) 11:26, 20 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello there. I can't seem to figure out how to add some references to an article in my sandbox. Could you help me through this?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saadahmad ( talk • contribs) 07:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Can you please double-check this edit, particularly the source it cites? I don't understand how we can use a source published in 2000 about an incident in 1995 to substantiate claims made about 2013. Thanks!

(And thanks for making this edit, too, after I forgot to do so!) ElKevbo ( talk) 03:06, 19 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks for all your efforts and contributions to the project! — Keithbob • Talk • 18:37, 21 September 2013 (UTC) reply

GA, I don't care if the template is daily newspapers only. I only thought it should be consistent, that is all. I made a list of all (I think) non-dailys on the template talk page. If you want to remove them all, I won't argue against that. A college newspaper template is probably a good idea. We can discuss it further on the talk page for the benefit of future editors. I'll follow your lead on this. CrazyPaco ( talk) 04:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC

I love western Pennsylvania, but the Steelers are an exception — thus the title of this section :-) Basically, I've only ever seen "The", "A", "An" included in two kinds of situations: (1) When they're necessary to avoid ambiguity, e.g. as WP:NOUN says, the difference between Crown and The Crown. (2) When they're the titles of literary works, e.g. The New York Times. I'd suggest you ask at a community forum (perhaps Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) about whether this is close enough to the Times situation to warrant "The". Either way, it's not such a clear situation that it should be moved without discussion somewhere, and it's obscure enough that I'd advise against having this discussion only on the article's talk page. Nyttend ( talk) 03:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply

No big deal. "Speedy close" either means a bad faith nomination or an out-of-process thing, but I hoped that my explanation would make it clear that I was "accusing" you of making a good-faith simple mistake. I probably wouldn't have made this suggestion if you'd gotten any keep or delete votes. Nyttend ( talk) 05:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi, I refer to your nomination at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 9#The Terrible Towel. Since {{ db-move}} has been declined this should now go to WP:RM/CM where it can get a full discussion. I regret that WP:RFD is not an appropriate forum to determine controversial page moves. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 13:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply

• Seriously? Ok-- GrapedApe ( talk) 22:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
  • I have just seen that this was previously at AFD so I regret that you have been passed around the houses. Deletion for page moves at RFD can only take place for uncontroversial moves. Since {{ db-move}} has been declined then WP:RM is now the appropriate forum. Sorry, I can understand your frustration. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 22:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
    • I'm sorry this happened; as the admin who declined the db-move tag, I fully supported the idea of taking it to RFD. I see now that the RFD page says not to have such discussions here, but why close the discussion after someone had already participated in it? It's one thing to move a newly-started discussion (that's why I asked for a speedy close at the AFD), but interrupting a discussion that's already in progress doesn't seem at all helpful. Nyttend ( talk) 23:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply
      • You make a very fair point that I gave thought to before closing. RFD is a very poor forum for determining controversial page moves. It gets much less attention than RM and the editors there have different interests and expertise. Also, in this case, the discussion is not at all about the redirect and entirely about our naming conventions. No course of action was ideal. However, discussion had only just begun and there had been just a single comment, and I formed the view that discussing something in the correct forum, and achieving the best outcome, outweighed losing that one comment. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 23:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Check City of Washington–Washington & Jefferson College relations; citations 6-11, 27, and 29 have some sort of errors. I don't understand citation templates (I've never used them), so I'm not clear what's wrong and am thus unable to fix them myself. Nyttend ( talk) 23:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hey GA,

Yeah, unfortunately I think that all of those images where the PA historical markers are the subject of the photo are probably copyright violations. I think all the talk pages for the individual county marker lists have a statement about that placed on their talk pages (see Talk:List of Pennsylvania state historical markers in Adams County). As far as I know, no one has tried to get a release from the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission for any images of plaques or of the text. It's a little complicated because the text is definitely copyrighted, but I'm not sure what that means for the actual physical marker. Is it itself copyrighted as a 3d work of art like a statue? Does releasing the rights to one of your photos mean that the PHMC releases the rights to the plaque and the text? I don't know. I'm not sure how they'd feel about it, actually. However, if you are up to trying to contact them, you should certainly give it a try. Keep me posted if you need me for anything on this. CrazyPaco ( talk) 06:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi, you initially offered numerous "proofs by assertion" about this page, and I would appreciate if you cleaned them up since other contributors have provided the original sources, mentions by the press, and proof that the NCAA itself tracks this statistic. Your comments were the first and strongest in favor of deletion based partly on these reasons and therefore carry some weight worthy of following wikietiquette (namely, noting your assertions have changed at the place in the article where you made them.) Please refer to WP:DISCUSSAFD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.254.239.1 ( talk) 13:43, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

• No.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 22:41, 14 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hello, GrapedApe. Thank you again for your help with the information under the "Work" heading of the Linda Katehi page. I left two new messages on the discussion page for other editors to look over about restructuring the entire article in order to organize the information more logically and about condensing the information about the protest in 2011 so that the section just focuses on Katehi's actions. Here is the new message about reorganizing the page and you'll find my other message directly below that one. If you're able to help out again can you look over either, or both if you have time, of these messages and let me know what you think?

Thank you for looking at this. LindaF UC Davis ( talk) 21:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC) reply

• You're probably better off posting a request at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 21:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Just an FYI that the References 2-4 (to the Pittsburgh Post Gazette website) on the Wigle Whiskey page do not exist. These links just redirect to the main post-gazette website. I'm not sure where the correct news articles are to correct the references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shazen27 ( talk • contribs) 17:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Can you clarify for me your comments on the List of endowments talk page. Are you suggesting that I am exercising article ownership? Do you have any suggestions for the issues raised? CrazyPaco ( talk) 17:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC) reply

• No, I was being sarcastic toward Dr. Heisenberg. He's acting like a weirdo. I guess my sarcasm didn't come through. Sorry-- GrapedApe ( talk) 22:49, 7 November 2013 (UTC) reply

No need for sorry, but I certainly don't want to exercise ownership over that article and I'm just making sure my actions and comments about the table are on the up and up. Thanks for clarifying. CrazyPaco ( talk) 05:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC) reply

BTW, I could use any opinions or suggestions on templates at the college basketball Wikiproject (see notice). You are probably aware of the ongoing battle at the cfb project about editors enforcing an extremely rigid style and control of content inclusion over 100s of college football navigation templates well beyond basic standard templates. Well they've now extended this to the basketball (actually they tried to bypass the cbb wikiproject claiming consensus from the cfb project, which I believe they don't actually have), and I have no reason to believe they'll stop there. I feel this one-size-fits all lack of any ability for customization is extremely bad for navigating a reader to the most pertinent articles of any particular Wikipedia topic, and therefore, is very detrimental to Wikipedia in general since global and rigid standardization seems to be the goal. IMO, they've (really one or two editors) have been exercising ownership over 100s of these templates in the name of a Wikiproject and I'd like your opinion as to whether I am over reacting or how I should further proceed, or perhaps shouldn't proceed. Am I making too much out of this? CrazyPaco ( talk) 12:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the heads up GrapedApe, and your contributions to the article. My view from last week was it was ready to go "live" so much appreciation for your efforts on that end. As far as comments by others I'm all for constructive talk page criticism and edits to the article but feel strongly this needs one centralized talk page and thus a live page. I'll save my views for the live article talk page but after reading those other comments I was thinking perhaps expanding on most every research park listed for their own sub-section and integrating the history section in the lead, and the one editors insights were very correct there is an opportunity to say a lot more in the article given the number of citations but again in my view a live article is the place to shape it in that advanced manner. I'll be moving it live within hours unless there is some concern I'm unaware of. ^{Market St.⧏} _{⧐ Diamond Way} 21:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC) reply

	The Editor's Barnstar
	In recognition of GrapedApe's consistent excellence in editing, image additions and article improvement while being a valued member of WikiProjects. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 06:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC) reply

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Nikkimaria ( talk) 20:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Hey, I saw that you're a contributor to college football articles, so could you leave your opinion here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject College football#NFL_Draft_section. I'm trying to get responses. Kobra98 ( talk) 05:14, 17 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Graped Ape,

You are quite welcome. Thank you for writing it!

Neelix ( talk) 17:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC) reply

PS - Have you considered archiving your talk page? It would make it easier for users with slower computers to get in touch with you. Various methods of doing so are outlined here. Neelix ( talk) 17:45, 19 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of YinzCam at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DES ^(talk) 19:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC) reply

• GrapedApe, there is a new issue: double nominations require two QPQs, one for each article nominated. You've only supplied one quid pro quo review so far; please supply a second so that your nomination can be promoted. (This is the only outstanding issue.) Thank you very much. BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC) reply

• Please finalize the review at Template:Did you know nominations/George Armstrong (ice hockey)—your query on hook sourcing has been answered. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 20:49, 11 February 2014 (UTC) reply

On 5 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gullifty's, which you created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gullifty's. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist ( talk) 10:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC) reply

On 11 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article YinzCam, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that YinzCam, a Pittsburgh-based company providing official mobile apps for more than 30 professional sports franchises, was created by Carnegie Mellon University Professor Priya Narasimhan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/YinzCam. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 15:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

On 11 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Priya Narasimhan, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that YinzCam, a Pittsburgh-based company providing official mobile apps for more than 30 professional sports franchises, was created by Carnegie Mellon University Professor Priya Narasimhan? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project ( nominate) 15:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

GrapedApe, do you have access to any special W&J resources that might help with Jim Zeravich? According to this and this, he played at Washington & Jefferson. I'd like a more reliable source to nail this down however. Also, what years did he earn varsity letters? The W&J men's basketball media guide doesn't list an all-time letterwinners section. Thanks! Jrcla2 ( talk) 18:08, 9 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I'm trying to finish up Washington county. There are some properties not visible from the main road on lanes that are clearly marked as private, maybe they'll be in the big HABS set. Generic1139 ( talk) 13:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm new at uploading these 'non-free' images, and wanted to upload one. I tried to upload it, but apparently it didn't include the non-free licensing information that I was trying to have it setup as, and now it's currently marked for speedy-deletion, and need someone's help with this! An example of one of the files you uploaded is this one:

File:Crazy Mocha Coffee Company logo.png

And, the one I'm trying to upload (if it's still there when your read this is: Grounds4coffeeLogo.jpg Thanks for your time/consideration. Zul32 ( talk) 23:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC) reply

GrapedApe, I'd like to get your opinion on this revised infobox template for college football players: [8]. After determining what data points to include, we'll recruit a template editor to handle the coding for us. Once we determine what fields we're adding and what we're deleting, then we'll work on the modified graphics. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 02:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC) reply

• Wikimedia:Meetup Pittsburgh

   Bfpage | leave a message  01:58, 21 February 2015 (UTC) reply

On 27 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Westinghouse Atom Smasher, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Westinghouse Atom Smasher (pictured), a 65-foot (20 m) Van de Graaff generator built near Pittsburgh in 1937, was instrumental in the development of practical applications of nuclear science for energy production? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Westinghouse Atom Smasher. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC) reply

GrapedApe, there are two other related TfD discussions @ Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 1#Template:Atlantic Coast Conference business school navbox and @ Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 2#Template:Ivy League business school navbox. The academic college navboxes where nominated separately from the student media navboxes, and the three Ivy League navboxes for business, law and medical schools were separately nominated for deletion because they are not identically situated to those for the AAC, ACC, Big Ten and Pac-12 conference navboxes. Regards. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 06:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC) reply

3-pixel accent with white text

Washington & Jefferson Presidents

GrapedApe, here's a preview of how the revamped infobox is going: Template:Infobox college football player/testcases#Joe Cool (typical example). What do you think of the colors, graphics, and layout and design -- and the "college varsity stripe" graphics in particular? Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 19:34, 1 April 2015 (UTC) reply

P.S. Looks like we need to get your alma mater added to Module:College color. Cheers!

Hey, I just took some pics on campus. Do you want to add more to the article? Niteshift36 ( talk) 05:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi GrapedApe. I see you haven't made an edit since May 2015, which is a shame because you were a spectacular contributor to Wikipedia. In the off chance that you return and see my message, I wanted to let you know I just created Ralph Churchfield, a W&J alum who played professional basketball in the 1940s. I couldn't find much on him, so if you have any sources to expand this article, please do so - thanks! Jrcla2 ( talk) 15:17, 28 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Tiger's Neighborhood character.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —  trlkly 16:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Cabrini college logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shorty's Lunch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shorty's Lunch (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Rockefeller University seal.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:King's College Pennsylvania logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kelly-Strayhorn Theater logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Delta Phi Lambda.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

I haven't made any contributions on this site in five years, although for a period of more than five years before that I invested a great deal of time into adding content to Wikipedia. I happened to look around today and noticed that you had requested, multiple times, that Hudson Relays be deleted. You were pretty thorough about it, resubmitting it for deletion only hours after your last deletion request failed.

/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hudson_Relays /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Hudson_Relays_(2nd_nomination)

Now, Hudson Relays is a school race and tradition at CWRU that's been held annually for over a hundred years, but of course, someone who didn't attend CWRU or live in Cleveland wouldn't have a personal interest in it. And of course, that's what Wikipedia is all about, isn't it? A fiefdom for people to maintain for their own personal interests while regularly deleting the work of others whose lives they don't particularly care about. So I want to thank you for reminding me that time spent contributing to Wikipedia is time wasted.

Here's some more worthless content below that you might want to submit for deletion after reading the arguments made by people who "don't think he's notable except to maybe extreme math geeks". But maybe ask yourself why a defunct restaurant in Pittsburgh (one that I've been to several times) is really worth keeping a Wikipedia page on, by your standards? /info/en/?search=Gullifty%27s

/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/P._M._Pu

McCart42 ( talk) 23:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:American Journal of Public Health Sept 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:East End Brewing Company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:American Journal of Public Health Sept 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:04, 29 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Tau Delta Phi crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:17, 8 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Red & Black newspaper.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 20:10, 25 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, User: GrapedApe, I would love to use this picture you took on article WESA (FM) because it is WESA's Radio Tower in your Picture. Please contact me back soon. Thanks and Happy editing. Bbabybear02 ( talk) 18:32, 4 June 2017 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on File:YinzCam screenshot January 2014.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{ Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –  Train2104 ( t •  c) 01:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Lebanon Valley College logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:28, 9 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Iceoplex logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Saint Joseph's University seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corky 07:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Delta Kappa Epsilon crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Uniontown Ninja screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 13:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Sportsline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard ( talk) 17:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Delta Chi Coat of Arms.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Association for Automatic Identification and Mobility logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:11, 20 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Zeta Psi crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Beta Theta Pi seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Bryn Mawr seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:07, 31 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:James H Trainor NASA Badge 1-crop.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 13:22, 9 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Phi Sigma Phi crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Mercyhurst University Seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:39, 17 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Wigle Whiskey logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Buddy Jeannette.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC) reply

The file File:Delaware Valley College logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 ( talk) 03:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Cheyney University shield.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Edinboroseal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:W&J College logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Portal:Washington & Jefferson College, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/University portals and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Washington & Jefferson College during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:07, 1 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Wilkes University seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:09, 9 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:American Journal of Public Health Sept 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Category:Washington & Jefferson College portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Phi Beta Delta logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Seven Springs Logo white.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Arsenal Cider House logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Pi Delta Psi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Awesome

Ten years!

-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:28, 8 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Messiah College seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 02:35, 25 July 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Latimer A. McCook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latimer A. McCook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 06:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Simple Sugars logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Phi Beta Sigma crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Mount Aloysius logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 04:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Theresa Kail-Smith. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 13#Theresa Kail-Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ―  Tartan357  ^Talk 02:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Indiana Drillers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:37, 22 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Good afternoon - I participate in the Fraternities and Sororities Project, having written a number of articles, cleaned up others and added graphics. Recently, I've worked on the broader upkeep and mentoring of the project itself. My latest contributions include expanding the watchlist (from 300 to now about 1,200 articles), clarifying structures for new project participants ( Notability, syntax, consistency), adding a {{to do}} list to Talk pages, etc.

While doing this, I've noticed a low-level campaign to WP:NPOV, WP:GNG and WP:ORG many of these pages into oblivion.

I happened to see you once weighed in on discussions for this category, and wonder if you would take a look at the recent AfD discussions ongoing, to see if there is a pattern here, like in April of 2011, when you helpfully commented on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Gamma deletion discussion. One user, Onel5969 seems to be aggressive in his "Deletionism" over a more helpful "Inclusionism". But he's also a leading contributor, and perhaps I am in the wrong. My personal opinion is that if an organization was once notable, it remains notable; Fraternities that were good enough for Baird's once, are good enough for Wikipedia. Here are the pages up for deletion now:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delta Beta Phi
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kappa Sigma (Philippines)
• I'd written another article on Canadian sorority Delta Pi last summer, which was similarly AfD PROD'ed into deletion. Unfairly, I think.

Delta Beta Phi strikes me as an interesting article about a valid, while minor fraternity, which should be kept. Meanwhile, my rationale to keep the K Sig (Philippines) article is at the deletion discussion, but part of this is an assumption that SEC registration in the Philippines offers enough to meet the bar of notability. Some of those weighing in to delete these pages seem to demand multiple, published, independent sources, as if their existence was in questioned or as if these were vanity articles. I don't believe groups like these, especially the older, dormant fraternities will ever have that level of multiple citations available. Yet they are real.

Do you have any advice for me?

By the way, I've recently learned that Baird's Manual now has its Archive online, which has been expanded and enhanced since publication of the latest (20th) 1991 print edition. The online Baird's Archive is available here. I plan to revive that Delta Pi page soon, as it is now in the online Baird's archive, and thereby meets the notability rules that have been flagging it. Jax MN ( talk) 21:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Hidden Valley Resort (Pennsylvania), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Z1720 ( talk) 01:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Bandit raccoon with owner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Muhlenberg College seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Barron Patterson McCune.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{ Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Star Garnet ( talk) 21:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Gamma Rho Lambda Crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:18, 12 November 2022 (UTC) reply

BD2412 T 15:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Nemacolin Woodlands Resort logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Dan Towler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:12, 9 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Category:Manor College has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 01:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Category:Central Penn College has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 04:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply