As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Horologium (talk) 01:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Dromisky Stan CHOC PIC.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 22:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Almaguer Frank USAID.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 22:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Anderson John NASA.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 22:11, 20 December 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on University of Florida Glee Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --smurdah ( talk) 02:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply

That is a hoax set of references, as confirmed by WP:OTRS correspondence. Please do not readd it. Regards, Daniel ( talk) 01:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:D'Alemberte LOC picture.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 01:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply

I have deleted the above file, as the source image was licensed for non-commercial use only. Only CC licenses which allow both commercial use and modification are treated as "free" for Wikipedia's purposes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn ( talk) 19:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on M. Dianne Murphy, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because M. Dianne Murphy seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting M. Dianne Murphy, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot ( talk) 04:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC) reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Stat Quo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof ( talk) 22:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC) reply

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Jonathan Earle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. dave pape ( talk) 16:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Florida Gators Dazzlers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bdb484 ( talk) 18:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi there. It's possible that the Dazzlers are deserving of an article on Wikipedia, but if that's the case, you'll need to do a little more work to get it where it needs to be. Simply saying that they are one of the strongest squads in the country is not sufficient. The main things you need to do are find reliable, verifiable sources to back up the information in the article and include them there. — Bdb484 ( talk) 19:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Perhaps the Florida Dazzlers paragraph would be better folded into the main Florida Gators article. I think 2 to 3 sentences would be appropriate, perhaps with a photo. I don't know that anyone searches Wikipedia looking for information on the Dazzlers, but the Dazzlers' contribution can and should recognized, in an appropriate way, as part of the larger athletic program. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 12:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Broward Hall (Gainesville, Florida), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unimportant college dormitory, no 3rd party references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG ( talk) 04:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I think you're overdoing it. I am going to propose an afd for all the dormitories, and experience shows that such articles are almost always deleted. You might consider merging the information to the list of buildings, which has been attracted some unfavorable attention at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities. I'm not in the least opposed to detailed content on universities, but I think that tis can best be done by not including material that will not be of interest to people outside the university--you seem likely to produce a backlash. IU remind you again about WP:COI and our FAQ on businesses and other organisations, including topics like these. DGG ( talk) 00:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC) reply

How did the edits to the Brevard Community College page mess it up? It did not in my browser, so I just want to know what you saw. Right now, though, all the pictures overlap the table, maybe we should just take them out altogether.... Cheers! Scapler ( talk) 02:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure why you removed Miami's 2004 Florida Cup victory all those months ago, but I changed it back. In the future, please cite any significant changes. Bmf 51 ( talk) 01:18, 9 May 2009 (UTC) reply

I now see that you are correct in saying it was founded by UF. However, it now serves all universities as they were merged into it in the 1990s. So all university's info boxes should be added, or we could just leave the system box as it was before. Thoughts? KnightLago ( talk) 20:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Ok. Thanks. KnightLago ( talk) 20:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on File:Marreese Speights.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Polly ( Parrot) 20:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply

NorwalkJames----As you suggested, I made contact with University Historian Carl Van Ness by e-mail on Friday, and have exchanged some entertaining and informative e-mail messages with him about Sledd, Murphree and the humble beginnings of the university in 1905-1906. He is sending me a Care package with the 150th Anniversary history that you had recommended to me, as well as a copy of Dr. Farr's 1935 manuscript history of the university. In exchange, I am sending him copies of the Barnett biography of Sledd, as well as some other Sledd-related items from the Candler Theology Library here in Atlanta. Nice guy. He indicated that he wanted to rewrite the early UF president bios and UF history for Wikipedia himself, but has just not been able to make time to do it. Hearing that, I let him know that my plan is to get the Andrew Sledd, Albert A. Murphree, James M. Farr, John J. Tigert and J. Wayne Reitz articles into presentable condition, and asked him if he would review and comment on the rewritten presidential bios when ready. He seems willing to help, as long as it doesn't become a bottomless pit for his time.

My personal work plan is to finish the footnotes for Sledd, Murphree, Farr and Tigert (I think these articles are starting to look respectable), and then I was going to circle back and use that accumulated information to rewrite the History of the University of Florida article. Once the history article is in presentable shape, then I will ask Van Ness to take a look-see at it, too. Once we get the history article into stable condition, then I plan to pare down the separate UF history article to 4 or 5 paragraphs (roughly, (i) pre-1905 prologue; (ii) founding era; (iii) Depression & World War II era; (iv) post-war GI Bill era and campus expansion; and (v) "quest for academic excellence" recent history), totalling about 1,000 words or fewer, and then drop those abbreviated paragraphs into the main University of Florida article. That way the abbreviated history section of the main UF article should cross-reference the separate UF history article quite nicely, without being overly redundant. Well, that's the plan anyway. Once that's done, then I will be ready to take a long weekend and do a fundamental re-write of the main UF article. Before I do that, however, I want to post a proposed outline of the revamped main UF article on the discussion page, and solicit feedback from the UF Wiki regulars for a month or more, and see if we can't get everyone on board with a plan! The hardest part will be gaining consensus on emphasis and scope. IMHO, the present main UF article suffers from ad hoc additions ---- a lot of the history and tradition items need to be pushed into the history article, and two-thirds of the sports references need to be pushed into the Florida Gators overview or individual sports articles. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 02:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC) reply

NorwalkJames, could I impose on you to create new stub articles for the men's tennis coach and the new women's golf coach? If you create the pages and the info boxes, I'll circle back and provide some text, cross-references, etc. Check out what I did for Buddy Alexander. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 02:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply

I have nominated Broward Hall (Gainesville, Florida), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broward Hall (Gainesville, Florida). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DGG ( talk ) 23:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC) reply

File:University of Florida Golf Course.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:University of Florida Golf Course.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:University of Florida Golf Course.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 06:55, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply

File:D'Alemberte LOC picture.jpg is now available as Commons:File:D'Alemberte LOC picture.jpg. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 20:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Dicamillo by LOC.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Dicamillo by LOC.jpg. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 20:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC) reply

File:Katharine Graham.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Katharine Graham.jpg. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 22:44, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Billy_Donovan.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Rockfang ( talk) 06:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:The_Pride_of_the_Sunshine.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Rockfang ( talk) 07:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply

It needs a license tag.-- Rockfang ( talk) 07:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Also, the text license does not match the flickr source's license.-- Rockfang ( talk) 07:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello, NorwalkJames. You have new messages at Rockfang's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Rockfang ( talk) 06:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC) reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Florida_State_Seminoles_football#Uniform_Combinations There is debate about whether to show every possible combination of FSU uniforms or just the ones that have been used. Basically this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fsuunis.jpg versus this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ACC-Uniform-combination-FSU.PNG User Kevin W claims that he is seeking "uniformity" with other college football pages that show every possibly combination, without regard for their actual use. I disagree. Why show combinations that have not and will not be used? As a contributor to the page I am asking for more input and help as others are now agreeing with me but Kevin won't stop. Thanks. AriGold ( talk) 20:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply

I did not understand your correction to this article which changed the more commonly used " community college" (2-year schools) to " state college" whatever that means. Could you explain? Student7 ( talk) 23:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC) reply

The article Jon M. Mills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is the wrong spelling (apparently) of a redirect. Creates confusion and fills up a space in case there's an actual Jon M. Mills article in the future.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams ( talk) 08:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I have nominated Weaver Hall (Gainesville, Florida), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weaver Hall (Gainesville, Florida). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. かんぱい！ Scapler ( talk) 08:59, 3 May 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Jonathan D. Lovitz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject appears to have little notability; only one source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Doniago ( talk) 18:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Beaty Towers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaty Towers. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. 28bytes ( talk) 10:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Mark Wrighton.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.defense.gov/DODCMSShare/NewsStoryPhoto/2006-04/lowres_20060428151657_11wrightonpic-20060428.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Mark Wrighton.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Mark Wrighton.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Mark Wrighton.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Mark Wrighton.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Mark Wrighton.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. GrapedApe ( talk) 15:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• NorwalkJames, thanks for the note about the Wightman image. Yes, images from the DOD are generally PD, but that particular image was credited to a non-DOD employee at WUSTL. You might want to consider contacting WUSTL public relations officers to secure permission for a replacement image. See WP:OTRS for how to do that.-- GrapedApe ( talk) 18:33, 3 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:PresidentPadron.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 19:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Template:Deans of the Levin College of Law Timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC) reply

(moved from user page by User:Horologium)

Hi, I am trying to expand Virginia Tech's Wikipedia presence, but I am having trouble with tags. I was wondering if you had any thoughts or advice about what I can do to make the university's 8 college pages Wikipedia-approved. I am not trying to sound biased or promotional--how can I avoid those tags?Thank you for you help! VTMintern ( talk) 19:31, 14 September 2011 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Florida Career Resource Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Florida Career Resource Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 05:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Florida Board of Governors.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Corkythehornetfan ( talk) 21:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, University of Florida in popular culture, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 02:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC) reply

Template:Southeastern Conference Law Schools has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dirtlawyer1 ( talk) 03:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC) reply

The article University of Florida Hillel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable campus organization.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 21:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Miami Dade College.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:35, 27 October 2018 (UTC) reply

ShakespeareFan00 ( talk) 12:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The file File:Charles B Reed.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 13 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Blankenship bahamas.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Evelyn Lundberg Stratton.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Miami Dade College.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Rick Baker.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Rooney Congress09.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC) reply

The article Tolbert Hall (Gainesville, Florida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Historic" although no sourcing found to back that up and no other evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarM 23:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Template:Deans of the UF College of Health and Human Performance Timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 09:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Template:Deans of the UF College of Liberal Arts and Sciences Timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 09:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Template:Deans of the UF College of Medicine Timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym ( talk) 09:48, 4 January 2022 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alec Courtelis Award, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Courtelis Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 29 December 2022 (UTC) reply

The file File:John W Williams.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused photo of non-notable person; article about subject was deleted

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 ( talk) 16:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC) reply