This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 15:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Please stop welcoming editors and thanking them for their contributions when they do not in fact have any contributions. That is an necessary edit and could be confusing to the editor. See User:Darryl_The_Terrible for just one example. If you do not stop these and other disruptive edits, you will face sanctions up to and including possible blocks. I am not templating you as I wanted to leave extended information, but consider this a formal warning. StarM 21:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Star Mississippi Which users can I welcome? Dr Salvus 12:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I was wondering if you could help. Some years ago, there was a mass creation of articles on Italian friendly matches, for example Torneo Città di Bologna and Coppa Misura (Cesena). There seem to be a good 20 to 30 articles with similar lack of content and sourcing. Firstly, are they notable? Nothing in the article indicates that these matches are actually notable or significant in any way. Secondly, assuming that they did receive significant coverage, is there a way of accessing Italian newspaper archives to find sources for them? Thanks! Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
The aforementioned team has not guaranteed its qualification for any competition next season so you have to wait.-- Sakiv ( talk) 20:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
My friend, this is the exact same thing that I and others tried to explain to you, and which got you in such trouble, earlier this month. You have apparently jumped (once again) to a somewhat advanced step to get your List of Coppa Italia finals into Did You Know, but you did it without following the instructions. If you had followed those instructions, you would have seen that List of Coppa Italia finals does not meet the requirements at WP:DYKRULES. It was neither created, nor expanded five-fold, in the last 7 days, and it's not a GA at all anyway. You also listed the article under March 27, which is supposed to be the date it was expanded fivefold, but of course, the article isn't even four times the size it was when you created it last June.
I strongly recommend that you withdraw your nomination, so that you don't needlessly irritate the hard-working editors who tend the DYK project. Otherwise, I can well imagine that somebody will bring you back to AN/I, and you don't want that. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 00:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@ JohnFromPinckney, Star Mississippi, and DanCherek: I apologize. I think I have not read the instructions correctly. Now I just have to withdraw my candidacy. Dr Salvus 09:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@ DanCherek: After this, I intend to withdraw the application. Maybe I'm too distracted but I can't find the procedures to withdraw the application Dr Salvus 10:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
JUst noting this parallel thread on my Talk: User talk:Star Mississippi#My distructive changes While I have warned this user that he's very close to a trip back to ANI, I do think he's trying to edit in good faith. This is a genuine lack of competence, rather than one of malice, and the user may be young. Hope this can have a different outcome. StarM 14:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
To avoid this I have decided not to name any articles in GA, FA, FL and DYK. Have you decided this now, or are you saying that you decided this before? Because you were strongly advised to make that decision a couple of weeks ago, right, but you still chose to nominate Template:Did you know nominations/List of Coppa Italia finals two days ago?
@ Bilorv: I decided to abandon the GA, FA and FL awards until the end of 2021 after the opening of the discussion WP: ANI, to which was also added DYK after having failed this nomination. Dr Salvus 14:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Star Mississippi and Bilorv: I study the behavior of administrators. I look closely at the decisions you administrators make and when you have been successful candidates for sysop. I would have a thousand questions to ask an administrator about administrator action procedures, but I would end up boring you. I often dream of becoming a sysop at night. But for now I'm not obsessed and I'm not in a hurry. Dr Salvus 19:33, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Please don't worry about the messed up ping. It's hard at times and I struggle to keep up with the changes to Wikipedia. I became an admin at a very different time in my life. I certainly couldn't have earned it now. You can see I was very active in 2008-09 but other than 2012, minimally so until last year when my workspace changed and I had more ability to edit. Personally I enjoy updating articles and writing new ones. I don't do many "admin jobs" although I did monitor WP:UAA reports for a while as I was active at a time of day when others weren't and could help keep the make manageable. You can also see the kinds of pages I've created. I think, Dr. Salvus, if you look around the football projects you'll find articles that need work. As you work on them, like you did above helping Spiderone with non-notable articles in a language you could read that (I presume) he can't, you'll become a more accomplished editor. Don't stress about being an admin. It really isn't that exciting. StarM 21:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
@
Star Mississippi:
I
I probably had a desire to be sysop due to my narcissistic nature. I thought being sysop was a series of privileges, but instead it involves a series of commitments, such as checking the WP: ANI frequently. I would like to know more about this topic so I would like to ask other sysops what life is like as an administrator. Thank you for explaining your version to . Dr Salvus 22:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)me
::@
Star Mississippi: Let's change subject. I am no longer interested in the FL nomination of
List of Coppa Italia finals so I will ask you this question out of simple curiosity. Do you think the failure of this FL candidacy of this page is caused by the lack of data about attendance on the oldest finals?
Dr
Salvus
19:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I think the article meets all FL criterias (exempt the 6th). Unfortunately I shouldn't have candidate it for the third time, which made this article unsuitable for FL. I have made all the improvements proposed. Now I will not name any GA, FA, FL and DYK until December. Dr Salvus 21:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Bilorv. I am unfamiliar with the workings of featured lists, but in addition to the links Bilorv gave you, Dr_Salvus I recommend the thread above from JohnFromPinckney which had some helpful information as to process and how they work. StarM 21:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Bilorv I probably won't have read enough or I won't have explained myself well. Not a problem, it means that I will read the indications even more Dr Salvus 21:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Dr Salvus, I say this in the nicest possible way, but I do see you attempting to pick up all sorts of parts of wikipedia all at once, and my suggestion would be to calm down. Wikipedia is a vast beast with lots of different places people sit and work. As you master one thing, then maybe dip your toe into another. I fear you wish to have advanced rights (admin, rollbacker, pending changes etc.) but we only give these things to people who can and have shown for many months/years that they are trustworthy and know what they are doing. Rather than focussing on things that may be good in a potential RfA, you may be better picking a particular subject and running with that. If you wish to work on content, then find an article on a subject you like, and expand it to include more information and fix it up. When you have done a lot of these, you can look into what the criteria is for GAs or DYKs and see if an article you have made is in a similar nic to others. Or, don't do that, and continue to improve articles, which is what we are all here for.
Or, maybe you'd like to work with counter vandalism. I don't know everything about this, but you don't need advanced rights to do this. You can do this for a while, get to know the processes and then maybe ask for a toolset. I fear you move on too quick and don't read everything which can only hurt you in the long run. I'm here if you need some help, but I feel you would be better off finding your needlehouse. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 12:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Star Mississippi and Lee Vilenski: I will listen to the advice. I hope I never forget that. Dr Salvus 13:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 19:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Template:User hate Among Us, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User hate Among Us and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User hate Among Us during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JsfasdF252 ( talk) 22:17, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Dr Salvus,
Did you want User:Dr Salvus/redwarnRules.json to be deleted as well? Liz Read! Talk! 19:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Why are you so desperate to become a rollbacker? Many editors have successfully fought vandalism here for years without seeking or attaining rollbacker rights. Twinkle allows you to deal easily with vandalism, for example. Yet you seem to have asked several times either directly for the right, or how to get it. If you're not careful, you risk being labelled as a hat-collector (especially when combined with you stated desire to become an admin on your user page), and will jeopardise any future chances of getting advanced rights. Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 19:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Why did you revert the edit made by me on the City of North Tonawanda’s wiki page? The current information is outdated. 74.78.32.31 ( talk) 21:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Wikipediæ philosophia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Gela at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab Baffle☿gab 06:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC) (UTC) |
Hi, I notice you split 2017–18 Coupe de France First Preliminary Round into multiple articles, referring to its "history for attribution", and have now WP:PRODed the original article. The problem is that if/when the article is deleted, then all of its history is deleted as well and then we've got a copyright violation because we don't know who the original authors are. In this case, you should list the original authors on the talk pages of the new split articles. See WP:PATT for more information. Thanks, DanCherek ( talk) 00:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC) @ DanCherek: The principal editor to this page is @ Gricehead: Dr Salvus 06:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force ( WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks! |
Hmlarson ( talk) 18:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Why did you revert the edits I made to the Daybreak (2019 TV series) page? I condensed it for several reasons, which I had listed in my explanation when I edited. It’s written poorly, is too long and unnecessary (nearly 3000 words), inconsistently switches between first and third tense, makes references to a gay character as “a open Homosexual”, and in reference to another character states “she wears the tradition Hijab Indian Woman wear” which is grammatically and factually incorrect.
I can provide more evidence as to why I edited it, including misspellings, run-on sentences, and unnecessary capitalizations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.36.184 ( talk)
...is pointless and shouldn't be done. This is not a good edit (and not good content-wise either, the "premier football competition" is marketing speak which can just as well apply to e.g. the World Cup). Fram ( talk) 07:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Fram Ok, I've understood Dr Salvus 07:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
It looks as if here, you simply ddi a search and replace, changing all hyphens to dashes, including changes like "shoot-out" to "shoot–out" or "Quarter-finals" to "Quarter–finals". Please don't make such wholesale replacements. Fram ( talk) 07:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your restoration of removed content here, other than a small number of items, editors are allowed to remove messages from their talk page. See WP:BLANKING.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Ponyo Ok, I didn't know this fact. Dr Salvus 21:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gela you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate ( talk) 10:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
I put this note because there are so many talk page stalkers who constantly monitor my talk and they might think that I have not understood anything from the Ani discussion. if I fail, however, I will not give up as I have done on other occasions Dr Salvus 11:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Gela you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gela for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate ( talk) 13:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Mz7 ( talk) 21:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021–22 A.S. Roma season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 ( Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 20:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, just as a note - you should never close a discussion in which you have !voted at XfD - per WP:NACINV. In this case, I don't think it's worth overturning the close, but any further examples of this are likely to see you taken to ANI pretty quickly by someone. Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 07:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
I have reverted your close. What on earth made you think it was a good idea? If you try anything like that again you will be blocked, OK? Giant Snowman 09:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
GiantSnowman Ok, I'll learn from this error. I have already add this fact in my Thing not to do list. Dr Salvus 09:49, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
You cannot restore the edit and hide its content... Giant Snowman 20:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Just so you know, in case you don't already: there's nothing wrong with having two reference citations for something. You usually don't want seven, but there's no need to remove a second, reliable source. Happy editing, — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 15:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 10:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Good luck with your exams. When you're back, I wondered if you might take a look at Monica Casiraghi if you have a chance, even though I know your focus is soccer. I'm working on articles about women 100KM world champions and there's a lot out there in Italian. Unfortunately, my Italian is rudimentary, at best. Thanks either way! Star Mississippi 15:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Please see WP:SELFBLOCK - rather than blocking you, consider adding Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/WikiBreak Enforcer instead, which will prevent you logging in until your exams have passed. Giant Snowman 08:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. You reverted two edits at Gianluigi Buffon, with the edit summary "Both edit were nonsense". The first edit [2] wasn't vandalism, but a reflection of recent announcements like this one, the second one simply introduced a helpful and correct link [3]. Even if the link perhaps wasn't needed (e.g. if it was already linked above), it surely wasn't "nonsense" and shouldn't have been reverted like this, per WP:BITE. Fram ( talk) 15:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
On 19 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Giampiero Boniperti, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 10:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Happy birthday Doc! Star Mississippi 19:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Dr Salvus,
I'm not aware of there being any rules regarding this, but when you copy/paste sections in your talk page archives, as you did here, it causes all the pings in the text to be notified again. I got three from that edit alone. Better to let the archive bot deal with archiving? Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 07:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi. When you added your support at the RM with this edit, you accidentally deleted the whole discussion. I've restored it, but you'll have to re-add your vote. Lennart97 ( talk) 23:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Wikipediæ philosophia:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
Hi. What makes you think preliminary should have a capital P in 2021–22 Coupe de France preliminary rounds? Please quote a MOS page or revert, thanks. Also, you've broken all the links between pages with your move. Gricehead ( talk) 21:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello there, I have received your message asking for a reference after I included the referee in the friendly details. While I have done as asked, it is not common and rarely seen (if ever) to have a reference next to the referee's name. I would like to re-edit it and remove the reference all together because the official match report from the Roma website was published. What is your take on this?
Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:5D3E:500:94AA:CE1F:5624:CE58 ( talk • contribs)
Hi! I've created a page for Marinelli. I was going to do the same for Valeria Pirone but I couldn't find a reliable source for her caps for Italy. According to Italian Wikipedia, she has 11 caps but I couldn't verify this anywhere. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Salvo, have you already prepared the article of 2021–22 Coppa Italia Serie C? Because I've meant to work on it-- Andyen94 ( talk) 17:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Category:2020s in Cesena has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DemonStalker ( talk) 02:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Dr Salvus,
Please do not tag a page for deletion before an AFD discussion has been closed. This was premature, even if it looks like deletion will be the final decision. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Coppa Italia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francesco Orlando.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Coppa Italia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diego Peralta.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
You disruptive editing and removal of information has been reported on the talk page. Why did you removed the indication of players withdrew due to injury?-- Bergenoslo ( talk) 17:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
I did it and I also reported your behaviour. If the information that you removed is a WP:RECENTISM, you should removed it on ALL the national football team pages on Wikipedia. Why don't you do it Dr Salvus?-- Bergenoslo ( talk) 18:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
So you don't even know why you removed information and you have no valid argument to justify your removal of information. Your unfair behavior has been reported.-- Bergenoslo ( talk) 18:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Check the French or German national football teams pages for an example, but as I said the indication of injured players among the recently called players is normal and present on the Wikipedia pages of each national football team.-- Bergenoslo ( talk) 18:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
The consensus I see is Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_145#A.C._Milan,_AC_Milan,_Milan Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Salvo, if you want you can create the page. I'll add fixtures as for 2021–22 Coppa Italia Serie C Andyen94 ( talk) 10:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Juventus F.C. Under-23 season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stadio Silvio Piola.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
For retired players, it is standard practice to include club totals in the infobox where the player played for more than one club. See Carlo Ancelotti, David Beckham and Johan Cruyff as a few random examples. Thanks, Mattythewhite ( talk) 22:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering, do you want to continue with CVUA? Apologies for the delay, it's been a busy few months for me. Best, Vermont ( talk) 23:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
heeey. Just saying. Have I actually done 7 edits? Do edits in talk pages and stuff actually count? Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown ( talk) 20:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Juventus F.C. Under-23 season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paulo Henrique.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Today I've noticed that my IP address was blocked on 23 August and the block is still active. I had never had a problem with editing before a few days ago but I managed to solve the problem by changing the profile passworld (I had received an email saying that someone had requested a reset of my passworld). Today this problem has repeated but I haven't received any email saying that someone had changed the passworld. At the moment I can only send mail and use my talk page. What can I do to get back to editing? -- Dr Salvus 19:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Juventus F.C. (women) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cozy1298 ( talk • contribs) 10:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
I've arleady replied to your treath at WT:FOOTY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cozy1298 ( talk • contribs) 10:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
See my response at FOOTY. Giant Snowman 16:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Done Giant Snowman 11:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't do a lot with images - but if you need assistance WP:GID should help. Giant Snowman 20:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Great, thanks. Giant Snowman 09:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
If you cannot verify the information, feel free to revert it. I will leave the user a message. Giant Snowman 10:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Calcio.com has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Federico Gatti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArsenalGhanaPartey -- ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) 16:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
You didn't close the GAN. GamerPro64 16:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 18:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Federico Gatti you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Federico Gatti for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArsenalGhanaPartey -- ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) 14:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
I have put back GA1 in both Talk:Federico Gatti and Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Articles currently under a review, as GA1 still isn't formally closed. Manually changing to GA2 messes with the bot edits at WP:GAN. I have asked at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Federico Gatti what should be done. Hopefully someone clarifies the correct procedure. Nehme 1499 10:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, how are you?
I've changed the category naming convention in this template you created, and I've also nominated the previous cat I've created for renaming to match this new criteria. Just giving you a heads up to avoid some possible duplicates :)
Cheers, BRDude70 ( talk) 23:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day, Dr Salvus, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Dr Salvus. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. ~Swarm~ {sting} 14:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello Dr Salvus,
Do you have any further comments on this review? You haven't edited in approximately 3 weeks. If you no longer have the will to do so, please feel free to withdraw the review. If you do, I'd prefer you give me some suggestions on improvements to make to the article. I'd greatly appreciate a swift response. ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) 17:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Juventus F.C. Under-23 season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stadio Silvio Piola.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not sure whether User:Dr Salvus#Reasons I believe Massimiliano Allegri is the worst coach you'll ever see is actually a BLP violation or not - and I don't claim to be an expert in the area - but if it was me I would remove it just to be safe. Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 20:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. What's the problem...? Danyele ( talk) 14:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Wikipediæ philosophia,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 804 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 855 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Why are you reviewing a page in my sandbox? I didn't think sandboxes came under the scope of WP:NPP? I've reverted your edit because (again) it showed a misunderstanding of the English language being used. Regards, Gricehead ( talk) 21:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Juventus F.C. (women) season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vinci and Juventus Training Center.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you've tagged a bunch of CdF preliminary regional articles as orphans today (presumably using an AWB setting or a default). None of them are orphans, as can be proven simply by checking "what links here" on the article. Each one is linked to from at least one place (usually the main article for that seasons CdF preliminary round. Can you check these please, and revert where appropriate? Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 20:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Happy birthday! Hi Dr Salvus! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hello Wikipediæ philosophia,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 [a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size. [b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
There is a new template available, {{
NPP backlog}}
, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 13410 articles, as of 10:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
( t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Wikipediæ philosophia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Federico Gatti at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC) |
Acceptable for you ?
~~~~ Riktetta ( talk) 16:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Federico Gatti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 19:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fabio Miretti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Federico Gatti you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Federico Gatti for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Fabio Miretti you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fabio Miretti for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Federico Gatti you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Federico Gatti for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 22:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Fabio Miretti you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fabio Miretti for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 23:42, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Fabio Miretti at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cielquiparle ( talk) 23:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Wikipediæ philosophia,
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I've undone your edits to his infobox. I see no reason why it wasn't already accurate and consistent with how loan spells are usually dealt with in the infobox. He never had two spells as a PSG B player because he remained contractually a PSG player during the loan at Toulouse. Stuart1234 ( talk) 20:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Kichu🐘 Need any help? 15:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Please stop welcoming editors and thanking them for their contributions when they do not in fact have any contributions. That is an necessary edit and could be confusing to the editor. See User:Darryl_The_Terrible for just one example. If you do not stop these and other disruptive edits, you will face sanctions up to and including possible blocks. I am not templating you as I wanted to leave extended information, but consider this a formal warning. StarM 21:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Star Mississippi Which users can I welcome? Dr Salvus 12:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I was wondering if you could help. Some years ago, there was a mass creation of articles on Italian friendly matches, for example Torneo Città di Bologna and Coppa Misura (Cesena). There seem to be a good 20 to 30 articles with similar lack of content and sourcing. Firstly, are they notable? Nothing in the article indicates that these matches are actually notable or significant in any way. Secondly, assuming that they did receive significant coverage, is there a way of accessing Italian newspaper archives to find sources for them? Thanks! Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
The aforementioned team has not guaranteed its qualification for any competition next season so you have to wait.-- Sakiv ( talk) 20:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
My friend, this is the exact same thing that I and others tried to explain to you, and which got you in such trouble, earlier this month. You have apparently jumped (once again) to a somewhat advanced step to get your List of Coppa Italia finals into Did You Know, but you did it without following the instructions. If you had followed those instructions, you would have seen that List of Coppa Italia finals does not meet the requirements at WP:DYKRULES. It was neither created, nor expanded five-fold, in the last 7 days, and it's not a GA at all anyway. You also listed the article under March 27, which is supposed to be the date it was expanded fivefold, but of course, the article isn't even four times the size it was when you created it last June.
I strongly recommend that you withdraw your nomination, so that you don't needlessly irritate the hard-working editors who tend the DYK project. Otherwise, I can well imagine that somebody will bring you back to AN/I, and you don't want that. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 00:23, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@ JohnFromPinckney, Star Mississippi, and DanCherek: I apologize. I think I have not read the instructions correctly. Now I just have to withdraw my candidacy. Dr Salvus 09:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
@ DanCherek: After this, I intend to withdraw the application. Maybe I'm too distracted but I can't find the procedures to withdraw the application Dr Salvus 10:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
JUst noting this parallel thread on my Talk: User talk:Star Mississippi#My distructive changes While I have warned this user that he's very close to a trip back to ANI, I do think he's trying to edit in good faith. This is a genuine lack of competence, rather than one of malice, and the user may be young. Hope this can have a different outcome. StarM 14:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
To avoid this I have decided not to name any articles in GA, FA, FL and DYK. Have you decided this now, or are you saying that you decided this before? Because you were strongly advised to make that decision a couple of weeks ago, right, but you still chose to nominate Template:Did you know nominations/List of Coppa Italia finals two days ago?
@ Bilorv: I decided to abandon the GA, FA and FL awards until the end of 2021 after the opening of the discussion WP: ANI, to which was also added DYK after having failed this nomination. Dr Salvus 14:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Star Mississippi and Bilorv: I study the behavior of administrators. I look closely at the decisions you administrators make and when you have been successful candidates for sysop. I would have a thousand questions to ask an administrator about administrator action procedures, but I would end up boring you. I often dream of becoming a sysop at night. But for now I'm not obsessed and I'm not in a hurry. Dr Salvus 19:33, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Please don't worry about the messed up ping. It's hard at times and I struggle to keep up with the changes to Wikipedia. I became an admin at a very different time in my life. I certainly couldn't have earned it now. You can see I was very active in 2008-09 but other than 2012, minimally so until last year when my workspace changed and I had more ability to edit. Personally I enjoy updating articles and writing new ones. I don't do many "admin jobs" although I did monitor WP:UAA reports for a while as I was active at a time of day when others weren't and could help keep the make manageable. You can also see the kinds of pages I've created. I think, Dr. Salvus, if you look around the football projects you'll find articles that need work. As you work on them, like you did above helping Spiderone with non-notable articles in a language you could read that (I presume) he can't, you'll become a more accomplished editor. Don't stress about being an admin. It really isn't that exciting. StarM 21:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
@
Star Mississippi:
I
I probably had a desire to be sysop due to my narcissistic nature. I thought being sysop was a series of privileges, but instead it involves a series of commitments, such as checking the WP: ANI frequently. I would like to know more about this topic so I would like to ask other sysops what life is like as an administrator. Thank you for explaining your version to . Dr Salvus 22:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)me
::@
Star Mississippi: Let's change subject. I am no longer interested in the FL nomination of
List of Coppa Italia finals so I will ask you this question out of simple curiosity. Do you think the failure of this FL candidacy of this page is caused by the lack of data about attendance on the oldest finals?
Dr
Salvus
19:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I think the article meets all FL criterias (exempt the 6th). Unfortunately I shouldn't have candidate it for the third time, which made this article unsuitable for FL. I have made all the improvements proposed. Now I will not name any GA, FA, FL and DYK until December. Dr Salvus 21:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Bilorv. I am unfamiliar with the workings of featured lists, but in addition to the links Bilorv gave you, Dr_Salvus I recommend the thread above from JohnFromPinckney which had some helpful information as to process and how they work. StarM 21:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Bilorv I probably won't have read enough or I won't have explained myself well. Not a problem, it means that I will read the indications even more Dr Salvus 21:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Dr Salvus, I say this in the nicest possible way, but I do see you attempting to pick up all sorts of parts of wikipedia all at once, and my suggestion would be to calm down. Wikipedia is a vast beast with lots of different places people sit and work. As you master one thing, then maybe dip your toe into another. I fear you wish to have advanced rights (admin, rollbacker, pending changes etc.) but we only give these things to people who can and have shown for many months/years that they are trustworthy and know what they are doing. Rather than focussing on things that may be good in a potential RfA, you may be better picking a particular subject and running with that. If you wish to work on content, then find an article on a subject you like, and expand it to include more information and fix it up. When you have done a lot of these, you can look into what the criteria is for GAs or DYKs and see if an article you have made is in a similar nic to others. Or, don't do that, and continue to improve articles, which is what we are all here for.
Or, maybe you'd like to work with counter vandalism. I don't know everything about this, but you don't need advanced rights to do this. You can do this for a while, get to know the processes and then maybe ask for a toolset. I fear you move on too quick and don't read everything which can only hurt you in the long run. I'm here if you need some help, but I feel you would be better off finding your needlehouse. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ( talk • contribs) 12:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Star Mississippi and Lee Vilenski: I will listen to the advice. I hope I never forget that. Dr Salvus 13:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Vaselineeeeeeee ★★★ 19:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Template:User hate Among Us, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User hate Among Us and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User hate Among Us during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JsfasdF252 ( talk) 22:17, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Dr Salvus,
Did you want User:Dr Salvus/redwarnRules.json to be deleted as well? Liz Read! Talk! 19:46, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Why are you so desperate to become a rollbacker? Many editors have successfully fought vandalism here for years without seeking or attaining rollbacker rights. Twinkle allows you to deal easily with vandalism, for example. Yet you seem to have asked several times either directly for the right, or how to get it. If you're not careful, you risk being labelled as a hat-collector (especially when combined with you stated desire to become an admin on your user page), and will jeopardise any future chances of getting advanced rights. Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 19:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Why did you revert the edit made by me on the City of North Tonawanda’s wiki page? The current information is outdated. 74.78.32.31 ( talk) 21:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Wikipediæ philosophia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Gela at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab Baffle☿gab 06:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC) (UTC) |
Hi, I notice you split 2017–18 Coupe de France First Preliminary Round into multiple articles, referring to its "history for attribution", and have now WP:PRODed the original article. The problem is that if/when the article is deleted, then all of its history is deleted as well and then we've got a copyright violation because we don't know who the original authors are. In this case, you should list the original authors on the talk pages of the new split articles. See WP:PATT for more information. Thanks, DanCherek ( talk) 00:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC) @ DanCherek: The principal editor to this page is @ Gricehead: Dr Salvus 06:27, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force ( WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks! |
Hmlarson ( talk) 18:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Why did you revert the edits I made to the Daybreak (2019 TV series) page? I condensed it for several reasons, which I had listed in my explanation when I edited. It’s written poorly, is too long and unnecessary (nearly 3000 words), inconsistently switches between first and third tense, makes references to a gay character as “a open Homosexual”, and in reference to another character states “she wears the tradition Hijab Indian Woman wear” which is grammatically and factually incorrect.
I can provide more evidence as to why I edited it, including misspellings, run-on sentences, and unnecessary capitalizations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.36.184 ( talk)
...is pointless and shouldn't be done. This is not a good edit (and not good content-wise either, the "premier football competition" is marketing speak which can just as well apply to e.g. the World Cup). Fram ( talk) 07:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Fram Ok, I've understood Dr Salvus 07:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
It looks as if here, you simply ddi a search and replace, changing all hyphens to dashes, including changes like "shoot-out" to "shoot–out" or "Quarter-finals" to "Quarter–finals". Please don't make such wholesale replacements. Fram ( talk) 07:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your restoration of removed content here, other than a small number of items, editors are allowed to remove messages from their talk page. See WP:BLANKING.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:26, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Ponyo Ok, I didn't know this fact. Dr Salvus 21:30, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gela you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate ( talk) 10:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
I put this note because there are so many talk page stalkers who constantly monitor my talk and they might think that I have not understood anything from the Ani discussion. if I fail, however, I will not give up as I have done on other occasions Dr Salvus 11:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Gela you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gela for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tayi Arajakate -- Tayi Arajakate ( talk) 13:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Mz7 ( talk) 21:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2021–22 A.S. Roma season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 ( Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 20:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, just as a note - you should never close a discussion in which you have !voted at XfD - per WP:NACINV. In this case, I don't think it's worth overturning the close, but any further examples of this are likely to see you taken to ANI pretty quickly by someone. Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 07:21, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
I have reverted your close. What on earth made you think it was a good idea? If you try anything like that again you will be blocked, OK? Giant Snowman 09:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
GiantSnowman Ok, I'll learn from this error. I have already add this fact in my Thing not to do list. Dr Salvus 09:49, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
You cannot restore the edit and hide its content... Giant Snowman 20:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Just so you know, in case you don't already: there's nothing wrong with having two reference citations for something. You usually don't want seven, but there's no need to remove a second, reliable source. Happy editing, — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 15:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 10:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Good luck with your exams. When you're back, I wondered if you might take a look at Monica Casiraghi if you have a chance, even though I know your focus is soccer. I'm working on articles about women 100KM world champions and there's a lot out there in Italian. Unfortunately, my Italian is rudimentary, at best. Thanks either way! Star Mississippi 15:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Please see WP:SELFBLOCK - rather than blocking you, consider adding Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/WikiBreak Enforcer instead, which will prevent you logging in until your exams have passed. Giant Snowman 08:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. You reverted two edits at Gianluigi Buffon, with the edit summary "Both edit were nonsense". The first edit [2] wasn't vandalism, but a reflection of recent announcements like this one, the second one simply introduced a helpful and correct link [3]. Even if the link perhaps wasn't needed (e.g. if it was already linked above), it surely wasn't "nonsense" and shouldn't have been reverted like this, per WP:BITE. Fram ( talk) 15:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
On 19 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Giampiero Boniperti, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 10:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Happy birthday Doc! Star Mississippi 19:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Dr Salvus,
I'm not aware of there being any rules regarding this, but when you copy/paste sections in your talk page archives, as you did here, it causes all the pings in the text to be notified again. I got three from that edit alone. Better to let the archive bot deal with archiving? Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 07:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi. When you added your support at the RM with this edit, you accidentally deleted the whole discussion. I've restored it, but you'll have to re-add your vote. Lennart97 ( talk) 23:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Wikipediæ philosophia:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
Hi. What makes you think preliminary should have a capital P in 2021–22 Coupe de France preliminary rounds? Please quote a MOS page or revert, thanks. Also, you've broken all the links between pages with your move. Gricehead ( talk) 21:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello there, I have received your message asking for a reference after I included the referee in the friendly details. While I have done as asked, it is not common and rarely seen (if ever) to have a reference next to the referee's name. I would like to re-edit it and remove the reference all together because the official match report from the Roma website was published. What is your take on this?
Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:5D3E:500:94AA:CE1F:5624:CE58 ( talk • contribs)
Hi! I've created a page for Marinelli. I was going to do the same for Valeria Pirone but I couldn't find a reliable source for her caps for Italy. According to Italian Wikipedia, she has 11 caps but I couldn't verify this anywhere. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:43, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi Salvo, have you already prepared the article of 2021–22 Coppa Italia Serie C? Because I've meant to work on it-- Andyen94 ( talk) 17:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Category:2020s in Cesena has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DemonStalker ( talk) 02:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Dr Salvus,
Please do not tag a page for deletion before an AFD discussion has been closed. This was premature, even if it looks like deletion will be the final decision. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Coppa Italia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francesco Orlando.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Coppa Italia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diego Peralta.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
You disruptive editing and removal of information has been reported on the talk page. Why did you removed the indication of players withdrew due to injury?-- Bergenoslo ( talk) 17:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
I did it and I also reported your behaviour. If the information that you removed is a WP:RECENTISM, you should removed it on ALL the national football team pages on Wikipedia. Why don't you do it Dr Salvus?-- Bergenoslo ( talk) 18:10, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
So you don't even know why you removed information and you have no valid argument to justify your removal of information. Your unfair behavior has been reported.-- Bergenoslo ( talk) 18:21, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Check the French or German national football teams pages for an example, but as I said the indication of injured players among the recently called players is normal and present on the Wikipedia pages of each national football team.-- Bergenoslo ( talk) 18:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
The consensus I see is Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_145#A.C._Milan,_AC_Milan,_Milan Walter Görlitz ( talk) 05:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi Salvo, if you want you can create the page. I'll add fixtures as for 2021–22 Coppa Italia Serie C Andyen94 ( talk) 10:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Juventus F.C. Under-23 season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stadio Silvio Piola.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
For retired players, it is standard practice to include club totals in the infobox where the player played for more than one club. See Carlo Ancelotti, David Beckham and Johan Cruyff as a few random examples. Thanks, Mattythewhite ( talk) 22:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering, do you want to continue with CVUA? Apologies for the delay, it's been a busy few months for me. Best, Vermont ( talk) 23:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
heeey. Just saying. Have I actually done 7 edits? Do edits in talk pages and stuff actually count? Crunchy Cloaky Crackdown ( talk) 20:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Juventus F.C. Under-23 season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paulo Henrique.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Today I've noticed that my IP address was blocked on 23 August and the block is still active. I had never had a problem with editing before a few days ago but I managed to solve the problem by changing the profile passworld (I had received an email saying that someone had requested a reset of my passworld). Today this problem has repeated but I haven't received any email saying that someone had changed the passworld. At the moment I can only send mail and use my talk page. What can I do to get back to editing? -- Dr Salvus 19:23, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Juventus F.C. (women) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cozy1298 ( talk • contribs) 10:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
I've arleady replied to your treath at WT:FOOTY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cozy1298 ( talk • contribs) 10:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
See my response at FOOTY. Giant Snowman 16:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Done Giant Snowman 11:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't do a lot with images - but if you need assistance WP:GID should help. Giant Snowman 20:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Great, thanks. Giant Snowman 09:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
If you cannot verify the information, feel free to revert it. I will leave the user a message. Giant Snowman 10:55, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Template:Calcio.com has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Federico Gatti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArsenalGhanaPartey -- ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) 16:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
You didn't close the GAN. GamerPro64 16:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 18:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Federico Gatti you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Federico Gatti for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ArsenalGhanaPartey -- ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) 14:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
I have put back GA1 in both Talk:Federico Gatti and Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Articles currently under a review, as GA1 still isn't formally closed. Manually changing to GA2 messes with the bot edits at WP:GAN. I have asked at Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#Federico Gatti what should be done. Hopefully someone clarifies the correct procedure. Nehme 1499 10:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi, how are you?
I've changed the category naming convention in this template you created, and I've also nominated the previous cat I've created for renaming to match this new criteria. Just giving you a heads up to avoid some possible duplicates :)
Cheers, BRDude70 ( talk) 23:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day, Dr Salvus, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 14:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Dr Salvus. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. ~Swarm~ {sting} 14:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello Dr Salvus,
Do you have any further comments on this review? You haven't edited in approximately 3 weeks. If you no longer have the will to do so, please feel free to withdraw the review. If you do, I'd prefer you give me some suggestions on improvements to make to the article. I'd greatly appreciate a swift response. ArsenalGhanaPartey ( talk) 17:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Juventus F.C. Under-23 season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stadio Silvio Piola.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I'm not sure whether User:Dr Salvus#Reasons I believe Massimiliano Allegri is the worst coach you'll ever see is actually a BLP violation or not - and I don't claim to be an expert in the area - but if it was me I would remove it just to be safe. Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 20:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi. What's the problem...? Danyele ( talk) 14:53, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Wikipediæ philosophia,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 804 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 855 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself
here.
Sent 05:17, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Why are you reviewing a page in my sandbox? I didn't think sandboxes came under the scope of WP:NPP? I've reverted your edit because (again) it showed a misunderstanding of the English language being used. Regards, Gricehead ( talk) 21:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Juventus F.C. (women) season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Vinci and Juventus Training Center.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you've tagged a bunch of CdF preliminary regional articles as orphans today (presumably using an AWB setting or a default). None of them are orphans, as can be proven simply by checking "what links here" on the article. Each one is linked to from at least one place (usually the main article for that seasons CdF preliminary round. Can you check these please, and revert where appropriate? Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 20:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Happy birthday! Hi Dr Salvus! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC) |
Hello Wikipediæ philosophia,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000 [a] at the end of May.
Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size. [b]
In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).
While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).
A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.
Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.
There is a new template available, {{
NPP backlog}}
, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:
Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 13410 articles, as of 10:00, 13 July 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot
There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
( t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Wikipediæ philosophia. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Federico Gatti at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC) |
Acceptable for you ?
~~~~ Riktetta ( talk) 16:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Federico Gatti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 19:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fabio Miretti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Federico Gatti you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Federico Gatti for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Fabio Miretti you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fabio Miretti for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 20:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Federico Gatti you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Federico Gatti for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 22:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
The article Fabio Miretti you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fabio Miretti for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 ( talk) 23:42, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Fabio Miretti at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cielquiparle ( talk) 23:38, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello Wikipediæ philosophia,
After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.
Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.
{{subst:NPR invite}}on their talk page.
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I've undone your edits to his infobox. I see no reason why it wasn't already accurate and consistent with how loan spells are usually dealt with in the infobox. He never had two spells as a PSG B player because he remained contractually a PSG player during the loan at Toulouse. Stuart1234 ( talk) 20:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)