![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | Archive 74 | Archive 75 | → | Archive 80 |
Well yesterday in the office, somebody said "oh bollocks I'd better get the missus a card and something". And they said romance was dead.... If you're single, remember that today is also the anniversary of one of the greatest gigs of all time, so crank it up loud! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Since the editor who changed the face of this template [1] is topic banned and there is consensus to change the template per here, can you remove protection from this template now to allow these edits? D4iNa4 ( talk) 14:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Sent you a reply to your email. Warmly, Lourdes 13:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
There's an IP wreaking havoc - today they blanked the entire WikiProject Libraries page. They've been warned - obviously not here to build an encyclopedia. Atsme 📞 📧 02:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
St Pancras railway station you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
17:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The article
St Pancras railway station you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:St Pancras railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
20:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
What do you mean when you say "duplicate" here? The coordinates aren't appearing at the top of the article, and mean that the tower is invisible to a basic API search. My understanding was that "display=inline,title" was required to fix this. -- Lord Belbury ( talk) 19:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
|display=inline
), but as Lord Belbury says, we usually want the information repeated at the top of the page (|display=title
) because automated tools can look for it in a consistent position then (and of course not every article about a place has an infobox). Using |display=inline, title
does produce duplication, but I think it's pretty much accepted as standard these days. Hope that helps. --
RexxS (
talk)
13:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Hi. It seems like the Template:History of Pakistan was unblocked and vandalized again. Disruptive edits were made by D4iNa4 without consensus. Is it possible to have the edits reverted back to the last official edits and have the template locked again, which you had earlier requested and was granted. No consensus was reached on the any of the proposed edits. Kindly look into the matter. Thank you. -- Ratatatain ( talk) 15:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
...Thank You for nominating Lourdes - excellent candidate, pleasant collaborator and knowledgeable editor. I couldn't agree more with your 1st paragraph at the RfA. You nailed it. Atsme 📞 📧 12:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
On 26 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article UK Picture Editors' Guild, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that nominations for the UK Picture Editors' Guild awards have included photographs of battlefield conflict, German figure skaters, and Theresa May laughing? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, UK Picture Editors' Guild), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi.
Yesterday, I started to work on
User:Usernamekiran/James C. King. A few minutes ago
EricSerge published the article
James C. King. I find it difficult to be a coincident. I am not mad or anything about "publishing "my" article". Actually, his creation is a lot better than my draft. But all I expected was a little communication, instead of simply copying-modifying, and publishing the article. —usernamekiran
(talk)
18:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
The other editor's correct, actually, R3s. I think it was my bad originally, the use of "refuted" there. (Other editor might like to leave an explanation with each of their changes, but, well, you can't have your Honey Pie and eat it too, can you …) JG66 ( talk) 10:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Phil Lynott you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ritchie you edited the page above which now has a maintenance template to it - I believe I have addressed the issues of concern - would you be able to confirm for me please? Sarah-Monaghan ( talk) 15:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Sarah-Monaghan
Good question about the road - with all the development planned in the area it's going to get worse and worse. Thank you very much for all the clearing up you did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarah-Monaghan ( talk • contribs) 16:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | |
Three years! |
---|
How lovely ... -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333. Some time ago you asked if I’d consider putting myself forward for selection by the community as an administrator. I’ve been giving this some serious thought and attention since. Though I feel I’ve more still to learn and experience, I have considered an ORCP to gather feedback and identify my weakest areas, with perhaps an RFA much later in the year. (Personally, I suspect I’ve not contributed enough at WP:CSD, WP:PROD and WP:ANI, as well as needing experience of non-admin closures and the undeletion area you suggested back in September. The areas of likely initial involvement would be the regulars of WP:AFD and WP:AIV)
I had been thinking about contacting you for some time now to follow up the offer and seek any advice or suggestions of your own that I ought to address. However an incident I dealt with yesterday has prompted me to seek your observations now as it made me consider whether I’ve handled an issue either competently, or extremely incompetently. Personally, I believe the former but, if the latter, I’m due a block under 3RR, and clearly have much more to learn before ever asking for the trust of the community. You might like to look at my interactions with a new editor at User talk:86.187.172.17 over what I initially took to be their repeated vandalism at Naeraberg, and my repeated reversion and communications over this issue. It seemed like a good place to start! I’m not seeking your involvement in the issue itself – someone else can block me if they feel I’ve done wrong. Just any feedback in your own timeframe would, I’m sure, be most helpful to me. Regards. Nick Moyes ( talk) 11:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
This is regarding page /info/en/?search=Kuldeep_Pai. I see you have closed the page mentioning -'closing as no consensus'. I had included new artifacts, magazine reference and links of the National daily newspaper- The Hindu, substantiating the notability of the subject. There were three admins who had voted 'Keep' and none for 'Delete' in the AfD forum. We had discussions in the forum and I had incorporated few more citations to the content and improvised the content by adding his awards, with appropriate links. So why was this closed as no consensus. I would like to know the status of this article and what my next steps are...what else can I do to make this article live..kindly advise. Sharan ( talk) 10:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Don't hide very real problems under some wishy-washy title. He was a serial copyright violator who only reduced this once Corensearchbot came around, and even then he continued with copyvio translations and the like. This happened when he was here for a few years already and had created thousands of articles; not just in his first few edits. Fram ( talk) 10:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
The article
Phil Lynott you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Phil Lynott for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
17:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
I started a request for an ArbCom case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Copyvio and retaliation Fram ( talk) 13:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
User talk:Mz7#sources. —usernamekiran
(talk)
09:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333. The Copyvio and retaliation arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to, has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:01, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Is good, contrary to what I said in my response, and I will take it. But I wanted a discussion about the particulars, because I think this is a good candidate for adding a clarification to our existing P&G's. The general consensus seems to be rather clear that "if in doubt, leave it out" and that's fine by me (though I'm not fine with people asserting that either my link nor the original upload was a copyvio, given the fact that I've cited a court decision that explicitly affirms my contention). But I wanted to let you know that your advice was not dismissed out of hand, the way it would almost certainly appear from my response. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:14, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
On 9 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hanging Sword Alley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hanging Sword Alley was also known as "Blood Bowl Alley" after its infamous night life? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hanging Sword Alley. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Hanging Sword Alley), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, I authored the Aaron Sim page that you've deleted. Is it ok if I recreate it again and improve? It's my supposed first article here in wiki and I've made a good effort in doing my research. Shenalyn2018 ( talk) 03:14, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi @ Ritchie333:, the only reason it was deleted in the first place is because of its notability, and I think the subject is notable enough and I improve the article, can we open another discussion asking for others opinion from SouthEast Asian editors? As per G4; it says that articles that is improved are excluded-- Shenalyn2018 ( talk) 12:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Shenalyn2018
Any chance of you adding Abel Crawford to your watchlist for a day or two? As with the Digges article, the sources were completely misrepresented. Eg: the source gives a date of death of 1851 but the article said 1817, the article showed a legacy being given by the wrong person, and it claimed that Abel was the first settler, despite the source saying otherwise. It's basic stuff and I can do without the back-and-forth with someone who simply doesn't seem to get it, sorry. - Sitush ( talk) 16:50, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hm, the knives are out. - Sitush ( talk) 10:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
No worries! We've all been there. :) Andrzejbanas ( talk) 22:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Saw your user page banner and your comments at ITN/C. It is indeed a great shame that his article isn't good enough (yet) to post. I remember a Spitting Image sketch from 1992 right around the time that Frankie Howerd and Benny Hill had died, depicting Dodd running around trying to convince everyone that he hadn't died too. Amazing to think he lived on for another quarter of a century.-- Pawnkingthree ( talk) 14:38, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
I am currently considering the article St. Mary's Fochabers. The History section is a copy and paste copyvio of one source, and the Architecture section is a similar copyvio of another. When I have removed these we have the two sentence lead, most of which is encyclopedic. My inclination is to nominate it for G12 speedy deletion, but you may say this is wrong, because it can be kept as a single sentence stub. Would you like to comment on this? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
I am pretty sure that I have nominated the Crawford family of the White Mountains incorrectly at DYK. The process appears to be even more complex than it was when I last endured it and I notice that there are loads of potentially similarly malformed nominations in the maintenance category. Mine has ended up at Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Crawford_family_of_the_White_Mountains, as far as I can see, and I have no idea if it is supposed to move from there now or whether it gets reviewed there and then moved. Have I messed it up? - Sitush ( talk) 10:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
You advanced that there was a wp:consensus regarding the "reception" section at the talk of this article. Can you give the link because I don't see any discussion concerning this section. Woovee ( talk) 23:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Besides the joke about Trump, I later added a reply to your contribution in the extract from the Hawking ITN discussion below, which I later removed ( here) when I noticed the discussion was closed. So just in case you might be interested I'm adding it here (along with added supporting diffs), even though I don't really want to spend any more time on the matter myself.
Regards, Tlhslobus ( talk) 13:47, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
On 14 March 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Bowen, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 15:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | Archive 74 | Archive 75 | → | Archive 80 |
Well yesterday in the office, somebody said "oh bollocks I'd better get the missus a card and something". And they said romance was dead.... If you're single, remember that today is also the anniversary of one of the greatest gigs of all time, so crank it up loud! Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Since the editor who changed the face of this template [1] is topic banned and there is consensus to change the template per here, can you remove protection from this template now to allow these edits? D4iNa4 ( talk) 14:43, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Sent you a reply to your email. Warmly, Lourdes 13:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
There's an IP wreaking havoc - today they blanked the entire WikiProject Libraries page. They've been warned - obviously not here to build an encyclopedia. Atsme 📞 📧 02:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
St Pancras railway station you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
17:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
The article
St Pancras railway station you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:St Pancras railway station for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Tim riley --
Tim riley (
talk)
20:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
What do you mean when you say "duplicate" here? The coordinates aren't appearing at the top of the article, and mean that the tower is invisible to a basic API search. My understanding was that "display=inline,title" was required to fix this. -- Lord Belbury ( talk) 19:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
|display=inline
), but as Lord Belbury says, we usually want the information repeated at the top of the page (|display=title
) because automated tools can look for it in a consistent position then (and of course not every article about a place has an infobox). Using |display=inline, title
does produce duplication, but I think it's pretty much accepted as standard these days. Hope that helps. --
RexxS (
talk)
13:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Hi. It seems like the Template:History of Pakistan was unblocked and vandalized again. Disruptive edits were made by D4iNa4 without consensus. Is it possible to have the edits reverted back to the last official edits and have the template locked again, which you had earlier requested and was granted. No consensus was reached on the any of the proposed edits. Kindly look into the matter. Thank you. -- Ratatatain ( talk) 15:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
...Thank You for nominating Lourdes - excellent candidate, pleasant collaborator and knowledgeable editor. I couldn't agree more with your 1st paragraph at the RfA. You nailed it. Atsme 📞 📧 12:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
On 26 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article UK Picture Editors' Guild, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that nominations for the UK Picture Editors' Guild awards have included photographs of battlefield conflict, German figure skaters, and Theresa May laughing? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, UK Picture Editors' Guild), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile ( talk) 00:04, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi.
Yesterday, I started to work on
User:Usernamekiran/James C. King. A few minutes ago
EricSerge published the article
James C. King. I find it difficult to be a coincident. I am not mad or anything about "publishing "my" article". Actually, his creation is a lot better than my draft. But all I expected was a little communication, instead of simply copying-modifying, and publishing the article. —usernamekiran
(talk)
18:26, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
The other editor's correct, actually, R3s. I think it was my bad originally, the use of "refuted" there. (Other editor might like to leave an explanation with each of their changes, but, well, you can't have your Honey Pie and eat it too, can you …) JG66 ( talk) 10:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Phil Lynott you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Ritchie you edited the page above which now has a maintenance template to it - I believe I have addressed the issues of concern - would you be able to confirm for me please? Sarah-Monaghan ( talk) 15:08, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Sarah-Monaghan
Good question about the road - with all the development planned in the area it's going to get worse and worse. Thank you very much for all the clearing up you did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarah-Monaghan ( talk • contribs) 16:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() | |
Three years! |
---|
How lovely ... -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333. Some time ago you asked if I’d consider putting myself forward for selection by the community as an administrator. I’ve been giving this some serious thought and attention since. Though I feel I’ve more still to learn and experience, I have considered an ORCP to gather feedback and identify my weakest areas, with perhaps an RFA much later in the year. (Personally, I suspect I’ve not contributed enough at WP:CSD, WP:PROD and WP:ANI, as well as needing experience of non-admin closures and the undeletion area you suggested back in September. The areas of likely initial involvement would be the regulars of WP:AFD and WP:AIV)
I had been thinking about contacting you for some time now to follow up the offer and seek any advice or suggestions of your own that I ought to address. However an incident I dealt with yesterday has prompted me to seek your observations now as it made me consider whether I’ve handled an issue either competently, or extremely incompetently. Personally, I believe the former but, if the latter, I’m due a block under 3RR, and clearly have much more to learn before ever asking for the trust of the community. You might like to look at my interactions with a new editor at User talk:86.187.172.17 over what I initially took to be their repeated vandalism at Naeraberg, and my repeated reversion and communications over this issue. It seemed like a good place to start! I’m not seeking your involvement in the issue itself – someone else can block me if they feel I’ve done wrong. Just any feedback in your own timeframe would, I’m sure, be most helpful to me. Regards. Nick Moyes ( talk) 11:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there,
This is regarding page /info/en/?search=Kuldeep_Pai. I see you have closed the page mentioning -'closing as no consensus'. I had included new artifacts, magazine reference and links of the National daily newspaper- The Hindu, substantiating the notability of the subject. There were three admins who had voted 'Keep' and none for 'Delete' in the AfD forum. We had discussions in the forum and I had incorporated few more citations to the content and improvised the content by adding his awards, with appropriate links. So why was this closed as no consensus. I would like to know the status of this article and what my next steps are...what else can I do to make this article live..kindly advise. Sharan ( talk) 10:25, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Don't hide very real problems under some wishy-washy title. He was a serial copyright violator who only reduced this once Corensearchbot came around, and even then he continued with copyvio translations and the like. This happened when he was here for a few years already and had created thousands of articles; not just in his first few edits. Fram ( talk) 10:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
The article
Phil Lynott you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Phil Lynott for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
FunkMonk --
FunkMonk (
talk)
17:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
I started a request for an ArbCom case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Copyvio and retaliation Fram ( talk) 13:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at
User talk:Mz7#sources. —usernamekiran
(talk)
09:37, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333. The Copyvio and retaliation arbitration case request, which you were listed as a party to, has been declined. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:01, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Is good, contrary to what I said in my response, and I will take it. But I wanted a discussion about the particulars, because I think this is a good candidate for adding a clarification to our existing P&G's. The general consensus seems to be rather clear that "if in doubt, leave it out" and that's fine by me (though I'm not fine with people asserting that either my link nor the original upload was a copyvio, given the fact that I've cited a court decision that explicitly affirms my contention). But I wanted to let you know that your advice was not dismissed out of hand, the way it would almost certainly appear from my response. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:14, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
On 9 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hanging Sword Alley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hanging Sword Alley was also known as "Blood Bowl Alley" after its infamous night life? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hanging Sword Alley. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Hanging Sword Alley), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi Ritchie333, I authored the Aaron Sim page that you've deleted. Is it ok if I recreate it again and improve? It's my supposed first article here in wiki and I've made a good effort in doing my research. Shenalyn2018 ( talk) 03:14, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi @ Ritchie333:, the only reason it was deleted in the first place is because of its notability, and I think the subject is notable enough and I improve the article, can we open another discussion asking for others opinion from SouthEast Asian editors? As per G4; it says that articles that is improved are excluded-- Shenalyn2018 ( talk) 12:03, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Shenalyn2018
Any chance of you adding Abel Crawford to your watchlist for a day or two? As with the Digges article, the sources were completely misrepresented. Eg: the source gives a date of death of 1851 but the article said 1817, the article showed a legacy being given by the wrong person, and it claimed that Abel was the first settler, despite the source saying otherwise. It's basic stuff and I can do without the back-and-forth with someone who simply doesn't seem to get it, sorry. - Sitush ( talk) 16:50, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hm, the knives are out. - Sitush ( talk) 10:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
No worries! We've all been there. :) Andrzejbanas ( talk) 22:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Saw your user page banner and your comments at ITN/C. It is indeed a great shame that his article isn't good enough (yet) to post. I remember a Spitting Image sketch from 1992 right around the time that Frankie Howerd and Benny Hill had died, depicting Dodd running around trying to convince everyone that he hadn't died too. Amazing to think he lived on for another quarter of a century.-- Pawnkingthree ( talk) 14:38, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
I am currently considering the article St. Mary's Fochabers. The History section is a copy and paste copyvio of one source, and the Architecture section is a similar copyvio of another. When I have removed these we have the two sentence lead, most of which is encyclopedic. My inclination is to nominate it for G12 speedy deletion, but you may say this is wrong, because it can be kept as a single sentence stub. Would you like to comment on this? Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 10:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
I am pretty sure that I have nominated the Crawford family of the White Mountains incorrectly at DYK. The process appears to be even more complex than it was when I last endured it and I notice that there are loads of potentially similarly malformed nominations in the maintenance category. Mine has ended up at Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Crawford_family_of_the_White_Mountains, as far as I can see, and I have no idea if it is supposed to move from there now or whether it gets reviewed there and then moved. Have I messed it up? - Sitush ( talk) 10:50, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
You advanced that there was a wp:consensus regarding the "reception" section at the talk of this article. Can you give the link because I don't see any discussion concerning this section. Woovee ( talk) 23:36, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Besides the joke about Trump, I later added a reply to your contribution in the extract from the Hawking ITN discussion below, which I later removed ( here) when I noticed the discussion was closed. So just in case you might be interested I'm adding it here (along with added supporting diffs), even though I don't really want to spend any more time on the matter myself.
Regards, Tlhslobus ( talk) 13:47, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
On 14 March 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jim Bowen, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ad Orientem ( talk) 15:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)