![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Folks - let's keep calm about this. Your current talk is more what I would expect. Come to think of it I do sort of semi-remember making some splits. That would account for the missing history. I would reiterate, then, I was too naive to suspect that what I was working on was copied. Subsequently with more experience I learned how to spot probable copies and detected a few myself. I am sure that once you get into it you will find it was them that copied us and not vice versa. The people who do that are absolutely shameless. They can usually make some money off it, you know. I once saw a whole copyrighted book passed off as someone else's copyright. In indignation I thought I would express some indignation to the phony, but guess what? He was not allowing edits to his site. The site you suspected me of copying is not one of the better ones, in my opinion. I fear to say more. Much to my chagrin later I found that some phonies were getting into Wikipedia as administrators. I've been afraid that was the case now, but it looks like not. You aren't a suspect any more.
I don't need to copy anyone's anything. I'm an old man working in a field I've been studying for a long time just for the fun of it. There are few articles I could not improve if only I had the time! Tick tock. The activity you suspected me of is usually attributable to people in the young student category, although I had a friend once who did it through mistaken good intentions. He was discovered, his articles were removed., and he got off. Too bad, he was very skilled and he did regret it. Too late.
I don't know what you are going to do about the situation. You can't have blank articles. That's your problem. Sorry, but I am answering others calls for help. I got to finish something, I just can't keep jumping around. As far as the enemies are concerned, I am glad you understand that. Once you make an enemy of an administrator he is just as likely to spend the time he formerly spent of Wikipedia in trying to wreck it, which is not that hard to do. Then there are those with political or commercial axes to grind, not to mention ideological. The list is just endless. Well, in summary, I don't hate anyone here. You are just doing your job. Stand easy. I think you should go on doing it. If it is all right with you I think I will just get back to keeping the promises I have been making. If anything startling turns up let me know. This seems to be a tough call to make. Should you put it back or not? From my point of view, I would it just restore it. Your decision. Ciao. Botteville ( talk) 22:50, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, can you please check the website of Sergio Esteban Velez to verify that most of the information stored there is false and that the links to external links are down or no longer exist. I do not do it of ill will but it is evident that this wikipedia page only makes propaganda in the name of a person that does not represent any person minimally prominent in Colombian art, literature or poetry and I speak with full knowledge of the cause. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsebastian1501 ( talk • contribs) 01:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Simply frustrating, I will also consider stopping using Wikipedia. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsebastian1501 ( talk • contribs) 02:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
...helping another user adjust to Wikipedia? He is not exactly new, but he only became active in the past couple of months and thinks of himself as a newbie. He falls on the spectrum and I think that is the cause of some of his recent problems interacting with other people and doing strange things that are interpreted as disruptive. You had different kinds of problems when you started here, but you got past them and have become a valuable and productive editor. So maybe you can offer some insights. He sounds like he would like to talk to somebody who has some of the same issues he does. If you want to check him out, take a look at my talk page. If you'd rather not get involved, that's fine; forget I asked and delete this note. I have not mentioned your name. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Adam, I did want to thank you for how helpful you've been reverting that LTA who has a thing for my talk page. He's mostly just annoying, though can get threatening on occasion. Anyway, thanks. TonyBallioni ( talk) 06:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Was it necessary to tell ImmortalWizard the name of the template? The last thing I need is them using it at all. ― MattLongCT - Talk- ☖ 02:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
That template is on a need to know basis. As an autist, he might take that literally, and of course he really shouldn't. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
an editor with autism, which doesn't necessarily mean Asperger syndrome (although from what I know, high-functioning autism is very similar to Asperger syndrome). Anyway, I could post some of my frustrations, but I've probably had far too many to post them all. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
reminded me I have a few recent BLPs I need to update - thanks again JarrahTree 10:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Hi Adam9007, Thank you so much for submit the protection! May I ask you some questions of using Wiki?:
1. After protection period, if Lester1231 or if he uses another ID of his to come back to change and add those slanders words again despite of the result from the talk-page, is this behavior considered a violation of Wiki's policy? If he comes back and changes it again, should I change it back to what it is now? 2. Due to the history that Lester1231 did many personal attacks to the main composer Roc Chen, I believe he is intentional to vandalism Roc's reputation and the wandering earth page. If we talk in the talk page, such slanders or rumors of "Roc's music is not original but copy" actually got more spread, which is exactly what he wants. Can you give me any suggestion on how to deal with this or you believe the talk-page is only way? Thank you again. Wraper11 ( talk) 20:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
@Adam9007 Hi, 1. I'm not quite understanding the English here: "after the original account is blocked is a listed exception to the three revert rule", do you mean after original account is blocked and then keep revert is an exception? I suppose if the original account is blocked, then keep revert with another account or after unlock keep reverting are both violating the rules, correct me if I'm wrong. Wraper11 ( talk) 03:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Reverting actions performed by banned users in violation of their ban, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users.. So, if the an editor gets blocked and then creates another account to circumvent that block, he can be reverted without fear of the consequences as it doesn't count towards 3RR or as edit warring. Until that happens however, I'd lay off reverting. Adam9007 ( talk) 04:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Gotya, but certainlly if he creates another account/sockpuppet to do the same thing, we can apply to check if two accounts are linked or one is sockpuppet, and that would get him banned as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wraper11 ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
In RE: Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Deborah Bright, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Adam9007 (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007. Thank you for your concern. I was in the process of citing my sources when you deleted them. I understand the policies and I also want to make sure articles here are as accurate as possible. I am also new to this messaging on wikipedia so I apologize if I did not message you on your user talk. I am still learning the ropes of it. Thank you! (Wor0646106)
Greetings Adam9007. I'm drkdennis. Appreciate your concern regarding recent content additions and citation format. Since Wor0646106 was in the midst of adding content on 7 March 2019 at 00:01 when you deleted it at 7 March 2019 at 00:02, might you have let Wor0646106 complete what they were adding, including potential citations, before undoing it? drkd 19:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. I'd say at least some of it is likely to be challenged. There was no way for me to know that Wor0646106 intended to put sources in. Regards. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately
1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
How's Huggle? -- Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
I suspect some people would prefer you restore it. Qwirkle ( talk) 01:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 17:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for creating a red ping with this this A. I misclicked while chasing that troll. Thanks for your work in dealing with it. Enjoy your week. MarnetteD| Talk 19:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for digging through old user pages and nominating them for deletion. However, as long as they aren't obvious vandalism or attack pages, it's probably better to just leave them alone. Thanks, ansh 666 20:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
this is so stupid wikipedia sucks so bad all you have to do is just edit the whole thing it dumbisn't an attack. Most of this is stuff that should have been deleted donkey's years ago. It seems they're being declined purely because they're old
Hello Adam9007. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Atlantahawk, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a negative unsourced BLP blatantly intended to harass, attack, or libel its subject. Thank you. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 21:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Stop tagging very old pages in userspace for deletion, whether it's for vandalism or anything else. If you want to waste your time, that's up to you, but don't waste the time of administrators. Please go back and remove all the tags. I've already spent enough time on this.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Good finds but no need to bring that crap to MfD. Just use Twinkle to speedy delete the pages. If there are few or no edits outside userspace use U5 Legacypac ( talk) 01:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Weird. Well if it is a user mainpage or a sandbox just blank it. We can't really remove those pages completely anyway. Same effect when the user only made a few posts and buggered off. Legacypac ( talk) 01:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Adam, thank you for commenting on my talk page -- Sydney2019editor ( talk) 22:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello sir, I need your assistance regarding an article which I created today Bhoot Police (film). It would be glad if you do look at the article which it qualify the WP: Notability. And if you could change the article title from previous the title Bhoot Police (film) to the new title Bhoot Police then I would be greatful toward you and that you all encourage editor to make Wikipedia grow. AR.Dmg ( talk) 03:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
For helping me with the vandal. ★Trekker ( talk) 00:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mutual intelligibility, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ticinese ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go
here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) on behalf of
DannyS712 (
talk) at
19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am trying to write an article for "waste management in Australia" and I am looking for any possible advice that will help me improve it! It's also part of an assignment, so I really want it to be as better as it can before Friday. Thanks! 江波 ~ quellatizia ( talk) 01:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
PS I am not sure whether I should add links in both the leading and paragraph sections, or if they are meant to be introduced only once in the article. In that case, how should I know which goes where? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quellatizia ( talk • contribs)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Two Point Hospital you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Megaman en m --
Megaman en m (
talk)
16:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Edit warring and lack of consensus-seeking at Wikipedia:Office actions.
Anne drew (
talk)
22:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
The article
Two Point Hospital you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Two Point Hospital for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Megaman en m --
Megaman en m (
talk)
07:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
I could see a much younger and traditionally bureaucratic xeno taking up similar arguments (follow the demotion procedure! Rfc first!). I guess I’m less interested in untangling red tape and more prone to simply cutting through it. I appreciate your contribution to the consensus process. – xeno talk 03:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go
here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Was looking at history of the page, noticed that some of the edits were delete (guess b/c copyright). These new edits [1] and [2], seem to be copyright violations of the song "Get to the choppa"? Decicded to ask you because you were the one who left the warning over at the IP's talk page. Sorry for bothering you... OkayKenji ( talk page) 05:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
I removed the nominations from those particular articles as the user had been banned when I checked it. Now as it seems like that the user has left Wikipedia, I have done it again as he probably won't be able to do those edits. HawkAussie ( talk) 03:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Sorry you're going to have to help me here, I can't see when the copyvio from her website started and finished to know what to apply revdel to. Nthep ( talk) 15:45, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Adam,
Along with my business partners, Grady Hendrix and Goran Topalovic, I hold the copyright to all content at subwaycinema.com and permit re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License. As requested, I have submitted this information to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org.
Thank you, Paul Kazee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkazee ( talk • contribs) 05:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2019, the project has:
|
Content
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Adam9007. The page Tanoto Foundation has been substantially updated and I'd like to request removal of the flags you placed in 2016. Appreciate you taking a look please. Thanks in advance. Pt1979 ( talk) 06:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. Could you elaborate on what you think needs to be done to address the issues? For example all points are now backed up with at least one, in most cases multiple, credible sources. Pt1979 ( talk) 04:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for removing that uncivil comment from my talk page for me. — FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 08:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, It would better if you warned an user after you reverted their edits. Thank you and happy editing! -- BoothSift Talks 00:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
The reversal wasn't a mistake. A banned sockpuppet keeps introducing what appears to be non-encyclopedic material from dubious resources. You can see from the [ contributions here]. Is it possible to revert it and request page protection? I did post in the talk page but it appears it's just a troll. Satellite93 ( talk) 01:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey! Adam ,You yesterday helped me for correction of name faizan khan ( indian actor ) for that I thankful to you . Could you please help ne out to publish this page . It's now in draft don't know why . I have not so knowledge about wikipedia. How to add infobox, categories etc. Do help me . Filmsnfilms ( talk) 05:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
How is it an A3? There's no content whatsoever!!! Just a bunch of empty templates and empty references. The ICC Test Championship is in its first match, its not going to have an records (hence the emptiness). Easily fails any inclusion guidelines for lists. StickyWicket ( talk) 22:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
fails any inclusion guidelines for listsisn't the same thing as "no content whatsoever". I'd hardly describe a page with 26 tables (even if they aren't yet filled in) and 54 references as having no content
Stop filing all those reports about IPs. In case you missed it, I asked you to do so in an edit summary. They are a waste of time. The IPs are invariably blocked by the time you finished filing the report, or at least very shortly after.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback on the page Tanoto Foundation. I've made significant changes to the lead section so that it should now adequately summarise the contents. All information now contains multiple third party references. Could you take another look please and see if it's appropriate to remove the flags? Pt1979 ( talk) 03:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Is that your page? Tropetroop29 ( talk) 16:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm trying to find out who is the person who is the "Trivalist" account.
This person has been just deleted a section I made on the Universal Pictures Film Section page for no reason.
I dont know if it's a bot account or what but I've read its contributions and on its history it's just been deleting parts of pages for the most part. Tropetroop29 ( talk) 16:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the info. Yesterday I left him or her a conversation and so far they didnt respond.
This person has taken away that edit I did 3 weeks ago and didnt bother to talk to me about it and that is poor communication.
I've seen some of the discussions that person has had and it's been about blocking edits or removing content from pages. I dont know if they were having issues with another wikipedian or vice versa but thats been the main topic in their conversations.
Tropetroop29 ( talk) 17:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, hadn't gotten around to replying. Anyway, a better place to add a list of film series is one of the lists of Universal Pictures films, not in the main article. Trivialist ( talk) 21:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Autochorrisexuality, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
There are now 800 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the
NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some
really cool awards.
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rosguill ( talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Arthistorian1977 ( talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | DannyS712 ( talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA ( talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Boleyn ( talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Ymblanter ( talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Cwmhiraeth ( talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
Hello Adam9007, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Thank you for reviewing my user page, Adam. Since you didn't make any complaints, I guess it passed muster? Anyhow, thanks for the good laugh. -- MelanieN ( talk) 03:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your involvement in the asexuality discussions. I just saw you link to WP:UNDUE there. While the title for that sounds right, in my experience it may not be the best link to give in such situations, as it goes to a discussion about how to treat minority viewpoints. In a case like this, it's not a viewpoint whether she's asexual, that's a fact, and there may be extra sensitivity to a piece describing treatments of minority viewpoints when you're dealing with a minority group like asexuals. WP:PROPORTION, while a subheader of what UNDUE links to, gets more directly to the point that if it's not something that sources are talking about in regard to her, it may not be of sufficient interest for the article. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 16:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
such a minor detail as to be not be worth reporting here at this time, WP:PROPORTION gets right to the point you were trying to make, whereas WP:UNDUE only gets to there after meandering through "viewpoint" material. So yes, in cases like that, you should link to WP:PROPORTION instead. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 16:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
I just noticed this and am a bit sorry to see it, but there indeed are many things in life other than Wikipedia and I wish you the best. Even if you're not officially gone yet, I also want to thank you for your contributions. And if this can encourage future contributions, all for the better.
—
Paleo
Neonate –
17:10, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
others will even willfully try to make our work as difficult (and hope to make our life as miserable) as possible to discourageWell, they've succeeded magnificently in that
Hey there, as a heads up, it would be better to use speedy deletion for some of the pages you recently listed at MFD; that way it doesn't clog up the page with stuff that's obviously unsuitable. Something like WP:G2 for "test edits" or WP:G3 for blatant vandalism would suit nicely. Check out the links for the templates you can use for that. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Also, for some reason when you used Twinkle to list your MFDs, it kept on adding the date header along with the MFD, so there were three extraneous "May 23, 2020" headersThat seems to be a bug; that shouldn't happen and I don't think it's happened to me before. Adam9007 ( talk) 14:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I am being threatened to block. Kumarjatji ( talk) 14:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
I am being bullied Please help me sir Kumarjatji ( talk) 14:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Sorry sir Give me once change.
Kumarjatji ( talk) 14:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Next time this no mistake Kumarjatji ( talk) 14:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. fix the tataloo birthday Please tnx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rastin2 ( talk • contribs) 01:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
I suppose 'principal clarinetist in the national orchestra' is a plausible assertion of notability, but it's wholly unsourced.
If you want, I could put it into your userspace so you can fix that. DS ( talk) 23:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
If you want, I could put it into your userspace so you can fix that.No need. I'm hesitant to boldly move a 12-year-old article out of mainspace anyway. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for removing the speedy deletion tag on the article, I missed that it had been suggested as an AfD before. I was wondering if it would be wise to suggest it for deletion, or, in your view is Wheaton being a politician for five months likely to still meet WP:POLITICIAN eight years on? Still new-ish here:) Thanks! - OXYLYPSE ( talk) 22:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
is Wheaton being a politician for five months likely to still meet WP:POLITICIAN eight years on?Notability is not temporary. If he was notable eight yeas ago, he's still notable now. Adam9007 ( talk) 22:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I think its time for you to become an administrator. You have done so much for the community and anti-vandalism as a whole. I think you are ready for the burden of being an admin. Thank you. SuperGoose007 (Honk!) 03:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
You have done so much for the community and anti-vandalism as a whole. I think you are ready for the burden of being an admin.is quite a statement for an account that's only 9 days' old. Have you been editing as an IP before? Adam9007 ( talk) 04:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
So what was wrong with my edit on Jelle's Marble Runs? The 2nd Red Guy ( talk) 16:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
they also do stand-alone competitions around holidays with the marble names. Adam9007 ( talk) 16:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
What's the credible claim of significance on John Kinsella (criminal) ? Nick ( talk) 16:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
influential figurewhose
reputation went national. Not sure how to fit that in the article though. Adam9007 ( talk) 19:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
can you tell me where can i vandelize — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 ( talk • contribs) 20:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
how about in the sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
what does You currently can not change pages on Wikipedia.
The ability to change pages has been removed from this account, IP address or IP address range by DannyS712. This block affects Andrew07111712. The following reason(s) were given for this block:
Vandalism
Your IP address is 2607:fea8:3da0:4ef:1923:c9d0:c472:3dee. This block has been set to finish on: infinite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Apologies for the edit on black supremacy - was just trying to standardize the leads and didn't realize there was a -very- recent discussion on the issue. Should have done a more thorough search, just didn't realize it was so contentious. Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 15:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treasure (South Korean band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Dear Adam9007 thank you for your message at my talk, but I would like to point you out that my edits falls under at least two exceptions of the three-revert rule:
In fact your, clearly affiliated with AVEN, account maybe removed from Wikipedia as any other account which violates Wikipedia content rules and policies. AceRebel ( talk) 00:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
AVEN actions constitute conspiracy to defraudThat's a very serious accusation, especially without any evidence to back it up! As for it being contentious, the policy is:
Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to our biographies of living persons (BLP) policyThis is none of that.
account maybe removed from WikipediaAccounts cannot be removed. They are needed for attribution purposes. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Either you personally revert your own edit on Asexuality or I'm going to report you. AceRebel ( talk) 00:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
You should slow down; an admin will block him shortly. Dicklyon ( talk) 01:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
I've been WP:3RR blocked for too many reverts of obvious vandalism.If you were blocked for it, perhaps it wasn't actually vandalism? The mere fact that an edit breaks some rule doesn't exempt its reversion from 3RR; only the worst of the worst is exempt from it (well, any obvious vandalism falls under that, not just the horrible and disgusting type I saw yesterday on September 11 attacks).
why keep at it so rapidly?Because then, basically they win (even if only temporarily). We can't have that now, can we? You seem to be suggesting that I (we?) pretty much leave vandalism-fighting to admins. That makes no sense. Adam9007 ( talk) 15:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
request admin helpThat's what most vandal fighters do (at least after the vandal has received a level 4 warning), but most do not seem to see any reason to stop reverting. I know it's a pain, but what else are we supposed to do? There have been many times I've been on a vandal's contribution page, refreshing every few seconds and immediately reverting when I see a new edit, all whilst waiting for an admin to come along. I half wish I had the ability to block users in such instances. Adam9007 ( talk) 20:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you.
Jackmcbarn (
talk)
19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the Troll on my talk yesterday. Mot bothered to read their edits but I'm sure I can imagine. Appreciated! Glen ( talk) 05:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello? Did you see my post? I am not sure if you find it cause its under old Test Topic and you didnt answer after beeing that fast last time. So I try to push this once if you missed it. -- BIanca617 ( talk) 19:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Test — Preceding unsigned comment added by BIanca617 ( talk • contribs) 17:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Oh nooooo!!!!! I could cry!!!! Now i have to write this long text again couse it gone when publishing cause you wrote so fast :( I did a "test" first to see if I am able to write you finaly, because it shows 2 red boxes "this side is protected".
Ok. From Beginning. Hello. I saw you on dispute Page and I dont know what to do.
Seams there are 1-2 guys who hate me. They attack me all the time, stalking me, try to change my articles and beeing rude to me. An article I wrote is in one diskussion after next. Since nearly 2 Months now!!! I have no Idea what I done to them. I tryed everything. 1 of them starts with vandalism. Doing very rude edits against WP:Bio and against the sources. Just write ppov in the article and this also in a very rude way. See here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Michel_von_Tell&diff=980267392&oldid=979733489
I dindt say something and tryed to be nice. Just add more sources. But it dosent stop. They come again and again. All the time with other stuff and often in a rude way. I try to be nice, find solutions, try to explain, bring more sources, offer friendship, everything I can. Again and again but it dont stop. :( See here /info/en/?search=User_talk:BIanca617#Marking_changes_as_'minor'
I not eaven know whats the real problem of this 1-2 guys. Do they hate me, the person from the article, do they hate girls here, or is it normal here are that many rude people? I have no Idea:( In wiki rules they say other stuff? I dont know what to do or who I can talk to. The article is good and well sourced. Every single sentence has 1-2 sources. What else can I do? Can you help me? regards -- BIanca617 ( talk) 18:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I saw you on dispute PageWhich dispute page? I've never been involved with Michel von Tell, which seems tobe the article in question. Adam9007 ( talk) 20:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Ah Hello. I know you are not. I saw you there while searching a way to get neutral person to help me or someone to talk to or anything like that. -- BIanca617 ( talk) 20:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
:( -- BIanca617 ( talk) 20:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
This Netaji Jayanti article is crucial. It is observed all over India. But some possible political issues, it is not declared a national holiday. Netaji was the most lovable freedom fighter and so Indians celebrate this day with great pomp. Please review it. Wikifulness ( talk) 18:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
It is an official holiday in the Indian states like West Bengal, Jharkhand, Tripura etc. Wikifulness ( talk) 18:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry about this draft. I thought that redirects to the mainspace from draftspace should be removed, but I was wrong. I went to look on Wikipedia:Drafts and now I understood my error. Thanks and best regards, Paul Vaurie ( talk) 13:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi There, I believe you recommended this article for deletion? It was created for a Program page and unfortunatly, I didn't have time to get to doing some references, please can this be removed?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MediDude4345 ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi. You rejected the A7 speedy at Mon Wikipedia, because "The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance". However, I have no idea what that assertion would be. Having 700 articles after one year? Being the third? Having a total lack of independent sourcing? Nothing in that article seems to indicate any claim of importance. Fram ( talk) 16:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere, reverted to a better previous revision, or handled in some other way (see Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Alternatives to deletion)(my bolding). GreenC suggested AfD, but AfD isn't the place to propose an WP:ATD. Adam9007 ( talk) 16:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
WP:ATD-R says talk page or AfD for disputed redirects. So I guess we are both right. Not sure how to resolve that when there is a dispute over how to handle the dispute :) But in this case, the article would never survive AfD without better sourcing so I no longer dispute. -- Green C 17:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III ( talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill ( talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 ( talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany ( talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra ( talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren ( talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes ( talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Adam9007,
I'm just curious, how do you find these old user pages and sandboxes that have bad content on them? I can see stumbling across one occasionally but you have been tagging quite a few and I can't figure out how you would even locate them in all of the millions of user pages on the project. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Adam, I'm a bit confused by your removal of the speedy notice for Village Free School. You claim that schools are ineligible for A7, but I couldn't find any supporting evidence for this in our policies, or even our guidelines. Per our notability guideline:
"All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy WP:ORG, general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria. (See also WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, especially for universities
This private school doesn't appear to satisfy GNG, ORG, or even WP:CCS. All it does it attest to its existence, with its sole source. The prose itself just says it's a 501(c)3 incorporated entity. Also, none of this addresses the A3 criterion which I also tagged. Could you point me to the relevant policy? Symmachus Auxiliarus ( talk) 03:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
This applies to any article about a real person, individual animal, commercial or non-commercial organization, web content, or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions.As for A3, that requires no content whatsoever; even a single sentence is enough to avoid A3. Adam9007 ( talk) 23:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The page's creator, Gokul Sites ( talk · contribs), has been blocked for self-promotion, and their userpage was deleted for the same reason. They are clearly WP:NOTHERE. I understand many users are hasty with speedy deletion, but I think the WP:G11 is appropriate in this case. It seems unlikely that the user will come back to improve the draft and get it accepted, so it will probably just get deleted under WP:G13 in six months anyway. I suggest you restore the G11 tag. -- Un assiolo ( talk) 22:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Joe Bloggs is an entrepreneur and digital marketer. He is a founder of XYZ. There are those who believe such drafts should be left for G13. Also, believe it or not, there's actually talk of making drafts exempt from G11. Adam9007 ( talk) 22:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Nick ( talk) 22:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to dateWhy do I get the feeling that this does involve some issue with my contributions? Adam9007 ( talk) 22:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Adam9007,
Many thanks for your edit on Wexham Park Hospital and changing it to Slough. It is in the ward of Wexham Lea, to be exact but that is part of Slough Borough Council anyway. The attached link confirms that it is in Wexham Lea, a ward of Slough, most of the surrounding boundary is Buckinghamshire. [1]
Regards,
Mabbs001 ( talk) 01:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
It is in the ward of Wexham LeaI know :). I checked on Google Earth; it's literally right on the boundary, but definitely on Slough's side. I thought that might constitute original research, but thankfully sources back it up. Is the fact it's in Wexham Lea worth mentioning in the article? Despite the sources, I can see that being challenged. What's also confuses matters is that (I think) 'Wexham' sometimes includes Wexham Lea as well as the part in Buckinghamshire, but the article on Wexham is definitely about the latter. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007, kindly let an admin decide if its a test page or not. I'd appreciate you not removing the tag until an admin reviews and declines my request. I'm restoring the tags back. Thank you. -- Ashley yoursmile! 17:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
review the content of these pagesYou just said they're empty..... Adam9007 ( talk) 18:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I won't revert again at Wikipedia:Citing sources, so you have free rein at the guideline afaic if you want to declare a dispute that doesn't exist. If you want to discuss at Talk, discuss. You don't need an Rfc to show that there is no dispute about this point, but suit yourself. Happy editing! Mathglot ( talk) 17:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
You going to stop fucking about removing valid CSD tags, or do I need to block you ? Nick ( talk) 21:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
NPJD is an eSports team that plays multiple types of video games(in the history) is meaningful content. Adam9007 ( talk) 21:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
You'll need to explain to many of us why deleting material now that would otherwise be deleted a short time later is a waste of time6 months via G13 isn't "a short time". If anything, it's too long: see Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G13_deletionism (where I suggested lowering it to 1 month).
And why you think your interpretation of what constitutes a test page is correct and others are wrongWell, I thought that test edits are edits clearly meant for testing purposes. Not attempts to put something on Wikipedia, however misguided. I stand by what I said in the WT:CSD discussion: if it wouldn't be G2'd (or G1'd or whatever) in article space, there's no reason it should be in draft space, regardless of what other criteria may apply in article space. Adam9007 ( talk) 21:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
In short, if it is understandable, G1 does not apply.and so Draft:NPJD is blatantly not in scope ( user:1234qwer1234qwer4 needs to be cautioned about that (yes it was an edit summary, but that's irrelevant - putting the two together means that there is understandable content and so G1 does not apply). Sending it to MFD would be a waste of time, as if everybody had just left it alone it would have been deleted under G13 in a couple of months. Unless a draft is actively harmful (i.e. oversightable, subject to WP:CSD#G10 or a copyright violation) then doing anything other than ignoring it is a waste of everybody's time. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
You going to sort out Adam's complete clusterfuck of MfDsMy point is that if such pages are going to be deleted pre-G13, I for one would much rather it's via some sort of vetting process. It just seems much fairer. Adam9007 ( talk) 21:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry for coming in quite so strong with the "fucking about" remark and block threat, plus the other rudeness elsewhere.
I'll leave others to decide whether your mass MfDing of Drafts is appropriate and/or worthwhile. I'd suggest, as per
Thryduulf, that if you spot an errant speedy deletion tag on a Draft, just remove it and leave it, don't go with MfD, but as I've say, it's something I'm going to leave for others to decide whether you should be pushing stuff like that through MfD at all.
Nick (
talk)
22:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I'd suggest, as per Thryduulf, that if you spot an errant speedy deletion tag on a Draft, just remove it and leave it, don't go with MfDHang on, you started this thread after I removed a couple of improper CSD tags
I'm sorry for the mess I created yesterday. Some of the drafts I nominated for deletion as test pages were deleted by Liz. Not sure whether restoring them is worth it or not. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Ahem. Remember when I said it would be best for you to leave off removing CSD's? Are there new problems or old problems? I guess the gist is you are removing CSD tags that you should not-- same as before? (clears throat). Please do not remove CSD tags, you still lack the judgment to remove them in a non disruptive manner. I've been an admin a long time, and don't always agree with CSD tags, but I leave them for another admin to decide 'cause we all read WP:CSD a little differently. Plus all the points made above. Once again, please leave the CSD tags for an admin to evaluate. There are better things you could do with your time. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Prior discussion on this subject in which I partook. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Gayming Magazine Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Adam! Why did you retire? What's going on? :-( ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 05:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2021, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2019, the project has:
|
Content
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2019
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
Thank you for your efforts in patrolling new pages. I wanted to let you know that I have applied a speedy deletion tag to the article Index Case (album), which you proposed for deletion, because I believe it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion. In cases where it applies, speedy deletion is preferable to proposed deletion; in the future, please tag blatantly inappropriate pages for speedy deletion first if they meet the criteria. I have left the {{ prod}} tag in place, so that if speedy deletion is rejected, your proposed deletion will remain in place. Thanks!
Hello Adam9007,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Musha.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Musha.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Musha.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:BLP no footnotes has been
nominated for merging with
Template:No footnotes. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
🐶 EpicPupper (he/him |
talk)
22:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tony Hernandez (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dsuke1998AEOS ( talk) 00:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Folks - let's keep calm about this. Your current talk is more what I would expect. Come to think of it I do sort of semi-remember making some splits. That would account for the missing history. I would reiterate, then, I was too naive to suspect that what I was working on was copied. Subsequently with more experience I learned how to spot probable copies and detected a few myself. I am sure that once you get into it you will find it was them that copied us and not vice versa. The people who do that are absolutely shameless. They can usually make some money off it, you know. I once saw a whole copyrighted book passed off as someone else's copyright. In indignation I thought I would express some indignation to the phony, but guess what? He was not allowing edits to his site. The site you suspected me of copying is not one of the better ones, in my opinion. I fear to say more. Much to my chagrin later I found that some phonies were getting into Wikipedia as administrators. I've been afraid that was the case now, but it looks like not. You aren't a suspect any more.
I don't need to copy anyone's anything. I'm an old man working in a field I've been studying for a long time just for the fun of it. There are few articles I could not improve if only I had the time! Tick tock. The activity you suspected me of is usually attributable to people in the young student category, although I had a friend once who did it through mistaken good intentions. He was discovered, his articles were removed., and he got off. Too bad, he was very skilled and he did regret it. Too late.
I don't know what you are going to do about the situation. You can't have blank articles. That's your problem. Sorry, but I am answering others calls for help. I got to finish something, I just can't keep jumping around. As far as the enemies are concerned, I am glad you understand that. Once you make an enemy of an administrator he is just as likely to spend the time he formerly spent of Wikipedia in trying to wreck it, which is not that hard to do. Then there are those with political or commercial axes to grind, not to mention ideological. The list is just endless. Well, in summary, I don't hate anyone here. You are just doing your job. Stand easy. I think you should go on doing it. If it is all right with you I think I will just get back to keeping the promises I have been making. If anything startling turns up let me know. This seems to be a tough call to make. Should you put it back or not? From my point of view, I would it just restore it. Your decision. Ciao. Botteville ( talk) 22:50, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, can you please check the website of Sergio Esteban Velez to verify that most of the information stored there is false and that the links to external links are down or no longer exist. I do not do it of ill will but it is evident that this wikipedia page only makes propaganda in the name of a person that does not represent any person minimally prominent in Colombian art, literature or poetry and I speak with full knowledge of the cause. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsebastian1501 ( talk • contribs) 01:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Simply frustrating, I will also consider stopping using Wikipedia. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsebastian1501 ( talk • contribs) 02:35, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
...helping another user adjust to Wikipedia? He is not exactly new, but he only became active in the past couple of months and thinks of himself as a newbie. He falls on the spectrum and I think that is the cause of some of his recent problems interacting with other people and doing strange things that are interpreted as disruptive. You had different kinds of problems when you started here, but you got past them and have become a valuable and productive editor. So maybe you can offer some insights. He sounds like he would like to talk to somebody who has some of the same issues he does. If you want to check him out, take a look at my talk page. If you'd rather not get involved, that's fine; forget I asked and delete this note. I have not mentioned your name. -- MelanieN ( talk) 23:27, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Adam, I did want to thank you for how helpful you've been reverting that LTA who has a thing for my talk page. He's mostly just annoying, though can get threatening on occasion. Anyway, thanks. TonyBallioni ( talk) 06:28, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Was it necessary to tell ImmortalWizard the name of the template? The last thing I need is them using it at all. ― MattLongCT - Talk- ☖ 02:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
That template is on a need to know basis. As an autist, he might take that literally, and of course he really shouldn't. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
an editor with autism, which doesn't necessarily mean Asperger syndrome (although from what I know, high-functioning autism is very similar to Asperger syndrome). Anyway, I could post some of my frustrations, but I've probably had far too many to post them all. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:36, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
reminded me I have a few recent BLPs I need to update - thanks again JarrahTree 10:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Hi Adam9007, Thank you so much for submit the protection! May I ask you some questions of using Wiki?:
1. After protection period, if Lester1231 or if he uses another ID of his to come back to change and add those slanders words again despite of the result from the talk-page, is this behavior considered a violation of Wiki's policy? If he comes back and changes it again, should I change it back to what it is now? 2. Due to the history that Lester1231 did many personal attacks to the main composer Roc Chen, I believe he is intentional to vandalism Roc's reputation and the wandering earth page. If we talk in the talk page, such slanders or rumors of "Roc's music is not original but copy" actually got more spread, which is exactly what he wants. Can you give me any suggestion on how to deal with this or you believe the talk-page is only way? Thank you again. Wraper11 ( talk) 20:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
@Adam9007 Hi, 1. I'm not quite understanding the English here: "after the original account is blocked is a listed exception to the three revert rule", do you mean after original account is blocked and then keep revert is an exception? I suppose if the original account is blocked, then keep revert with another account or after unlock keep reverting are both violating the rules, correct me if I'm wrong. Wraper11 ( talk) 03:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Reverting actions performed by banned users in violation of their ban, and sockpuppets of banned or blocked users.. So, if the an editor gets blocked and then creates another account to circumvent that block, he can be reverted without fear of the consequences as it doesn't count towards 3RR or as edit warring. Until that happens however, I'd lay off reverting. Adam9007 ( talk) 04:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Gotya, but certainlly if he creates another account/sockpuppet to do the same thing, we can apply to check if two accounts are linked or one is sockpuppet, and that would get him banned as well? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wraper11 ( talk • contribs) 04:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
In RE: Hello, I'm Adam9007. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Deborah Bright, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Adam9007 (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007. Thank you for your concern. I was in the process of citing my sources when you deleted them. I understand the policies and I also want to make sure articles here are as accurate as possible. I am also new to this messaging on wikipedia so I apologize if I did not message you on your user talk. I am still learning the ropes of it. Thank you! (Wor0646106)
Greetings Adam9007. I'm drkdennis. Appreciate your concern regarding recent content additions and citation format. Since Wor0646106 was in the midst of adding content on 7 March 2019 at 00:01 when you deleted it at 7 March 2019 at 00:02, might you have let Wor0646106 complete what they were adding, including potential citations, before undoing it? drkd 19:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion. I'd say at least some of it is likely to be challenged. There was no way for me to know that Wor0646106 intended to put sources in. Regards. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately
1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
How's Huggle? -- Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
I suspect some people would prefer you restore it. Qwirkle ( talk) 01:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 17:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for creating a red ping with this this A. I misclicked while chasing that troll. Thanks for your work in dealing with it. Enjoy your week. MarnetteD| Talk 19:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for digging through old user pages and nominating them for deletion. However, as long as they aren't obvious vandalism or attack pages, it's probably better to just leave them alone. Thanks, ansh 666 20:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
this is so stupid wikipedia sucks so bad all you have to do is just edit the whole thing it dumbisn't an attack. Most of this is stuff that should have been deleted donkey's years ago. It seems they're being declined purely because they're old
Hello Adam9007. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Atlantahawk, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a negative unsourced BLP blatantly intended to harass, attack, or libel its subject. Thank you. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 21:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Stop tagging very old pages in userspace for deletion, whether it's for vandalism or anything else. If you want to waste your time, that's up to you, but don't waste the time of administrators. Please go back and remove all the tags. I've already spent enough time on this.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Good finds but no need to bring that crap to MfD. Just use Twinkle to speedy delete the pages. If there are few or no edits outside userspace use U5 Legacypac ( talk) 01:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Weird. Well if it is a user mainpage or a sandbox just blank it. We can't really remove those pages completely anyway. Same effect when the user only made a few posts and buggered off. Legacypac ( talk) 01:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Adam, thank you for commenting on my talk page -- Sydney2019editor ( talk) 22:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello sir, I need your assistance regarding an article which I created today Bhoot Police (film). It would be glad if you do look at the article which it qualify the WP: Notability. And if you could change the article title from previous the title Bhoot Police (film) to the new title Bhoot Police then I would be greatful toward you and that you all encourage editor to make Wikipedia grow. AR.Dmg ( talk) 03:10, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
For helping me with the vandal. ★Trekker ( talk) 00:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mutual intelligibility, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ticinese ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go
here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) on behalf of
DannyS712 (
talk) at
19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I am trying to write an article for "waste management in Australia" and I am looking for any possible advice that will help me improve it! It's also part of an assignment, so I really want it to be as better as it can before Friday. Thanks! 江波 ~ quellatizia ( talk) 01:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
PS I am not sure whether I should add links in both the leading and paragraph sections, or if they are meant to be introduced only once in the article. In that case, how should I know which goes where? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quellatizia ( talk • contribs)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Two Point Hospital you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Megaman en m --
Megaman en m (
talk)
16:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Edit warring and lack of consensus-seeking at Wikipedia:Office actions.
Anne drew (
talk)
22:13, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
The article
Two Point Hospital you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Two Point Hospital for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Megaman en m --
Megaman en m (
talk)
07:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
I could see a much younger and traditionally bureaucratic xeno taking up similar arguments (follow the demotion procedure! Rfc first!). I guess I’m less interested in untangling red tape and more prone to simply cutting through it. I appreciate your contribution to the consensus process. – xeno talk 03:11, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.
Stay up to date with even more news –
subscribe to The Signpost.
Go
here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Was looking at history of the page, noticed that some of the edits were delete (guess b/c copyright). These new edits [1] and [2], seem to be copyright violations of the song "Get to the choppa"? Decicded to ask you because you were the one who left the warning over at the IP's talk page. Sorry for bothering you... OkayKenji ( talk page) 05:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
I removed the nominations from those particular articles as the user had been banned when I checked it. Now as it seems like that the user has left Wikipedia, I have done it again as he probably won't be able to do those edits. HawkAussie ( talk) 03:15, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Sorry you're going to have to help me here, I can't see when the copyvio from her website started and finished to know what to apply revdel to. Nthep ( talk) 15:45, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Dear Adam,
Along with my business partners, Grady Hendrix and Goran Topalovic, I hold the copyright to all content at subwaycinema.com and permit re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License. As requested, I have submitted this information to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org.
Thank you, Paul Kazee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkazee ( talk • contribs) 05:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2019, the project has:
|
Content
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Adam9007. The page Tanoto Foundation has been substantially updated and I'd like to request removal of the flags you placed in 2016. Appreciate you taking a look please. Thanks in advance. Pt1979 ( talk) 06:28, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. Could you elaborate on what you think needs to be done to address the issues? For example all points are now backed up with at least one, in most cases multiple, credible sources. Pt1979 ( talk) 04:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for removing that uncivil comment from my talk page for me. — FilmandTVFan28 ( talk) 08:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, It would better if you warned an user after you reverted their edits. Thank you and happy editing! -- BoothSift Talks 00:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
The reversal wasn't a mistake. A banned sockpuppet keeps introducing what appears to be non-encyclopedic material from dubious resources. You can see from the [ contributions here]. Is it possible to revert it and request page protection? I did post in the talk page but it appears it's just a troll. Satellite93 ( talk) 01:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Hey! Adam ,You yesterday helped me for correction of name faizan khan ( indian actor ) for that I thankful to you . Could you please help ne out to publish this page . It's now in draft don't know why . I have not so knowledge about wikipedia. How to add infobox, categories etc. Do help me . Filmsnfilms ( talk) 05:21, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
How is it an A3? There's no content whatsoever!!! Just a bunch of empty templates and empty references. The ICC Test Championship is in its first match, its not going to have an records (hence the emptiness). Easily fails any inclusion guidelines for lists. StickyWicket ( talk) 22:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
fails any inclusion guidelines for listsisn't the same thing as "no content whatsoever". I'd hardly describe a page with 26 tables (even if they aren't yet filled in) and 54 references as having no content
Stop filing all those reports about IPs. In case you missed it, I asked you to do so in an edit summary. They are a waste of time. The IPs are invariably blocked by the time you finished filing the report, or at least very shortly after.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 23:50, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback on the page Tanoto Foundation. I've made significant changes to the lead section so that it should now adequately summarise the contents. All information now contains multiple third party references. Could you take another look please and see if it's appropriate to remove the flags? Pt1979 ( talk) 03:12, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Is that your page? Tropetroop29 ( talk) 16:33, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm trying to find out who is the person who is the "Trivalist" account.
This person has been just deleted a section I made on the Universal Pictures Film Section page for no reason.
I dont know if it's a bot account or what but I've read its contributions and on its history it's just been deleting parts of pages for the most part. Tropetroop29 ( talk) 16:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the info. Yesterday I left him or her a conversation and so far they didnt respond.
This person has taken away that edit I did 3 weeks ago and didnt bother to talk to me about it and that is poor communication.
I've seen some of the discussions that person has had and it's been about blocking edits or removing content from pages. I dont know if they were having issues with another wikipedian or vice versa but thats been the main topic in their conversations.
Tropetroop29 ( talk) 17:01, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, hadn't gotten around to replying. Anyway, a better place to add a list of film series is one of the lists of Universal Pictures films, not in the main article. Trivialist ( talk) 21:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.
Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.
Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.
Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.
Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.
Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.
DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Autochorrisexuality, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
There are now 800 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the
NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some
really cool awards.
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello!
The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.
Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.
The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.
Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
-- User:Martin Urbanec ( talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rosguill ( talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Arthistorian1977 ( talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | DannyS712 ( talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA ( talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Boleyn ( talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Ymblanter ( talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Cwmhiraeth ( talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
Hello Adam9007, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Thank you for reviewing my user page, Adam. Since you didn't make any complaints, I guess it passed muster? Anyhow, thanks for the good laugh. -- MelanieN ( talk) 03:24, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your involvement in the asexuality discussions. I just saw you link to WP:UNDUE there. While the title for that sounds right, in my experience it may not be the best link to give in such situations, as it goes to a discussion about how to treat minority viewpoints. In a case like this, it's not a viewpoint whether she's asexual, that's a fact, and there may be extra sensitivity to a piece describing treatments of minority viewpoints when you're dealing with a minority group like asexuals. WP:PROPORTION, while a subheader of what UNDUE links to, gets more directly to the point that if it's not something that sources are talking about in regard to her, it may not be of sufficient interest for the article. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 16:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
such a minor detail as to be not be worth reporting here at this time, WP:PROPORTION gets right to the point you were trying to make, whereas WP:UNDUE only gets to there after meandering through "viewpoint" material. So yes, in cases like that, you should link to WP:PROPORTION instead. -- Nat Gertler ( talk) 16:29, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.
New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.
Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
I just noticed this and am a bit sorry to see it, but there indeed are many things in life other than Wikipedia and I wish you the best. Even if you're not officially gone yet, I also want to thank you for your contributions. And if this can encourage future contributions, all for the better.
—
Paleo
Neonate –
17:10, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
others will even willfully try to make our work as difficult (and hope to make our life as miserable) as possible to discourageWell, they've succeeded magnificently in that
Hey there, as a heads up, it would be better to use speedy deletion for some of the pages you recently listed at MFD; that way it doesn't clog up the page with stuff that's obviously unsuitable. Something like WP:G2 for "test edits" or WP:G3 for blatant vandalism would suit nicely. Check out the links for the templates you can use for that. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:51, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Also, for some reason when you used Twinkle to list your MFDs, it kept on adding the date header along with the MFD, so there were three extraneous "May 23, 2020" headersThat seems to be a bug; that shouldn't happen and I don't think it's happened to me before. Adam9007 ( talk) 14:31, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
I am being threatened to block. Kumarjatji ( talk) 14:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
I am being bullied Please help me sir Kumarjatji ( talk) 14:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Sorry sir Give me once change.
Kumarjatji ( talk) 14:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Next time this no mistake Kumarjatji ( talk) 14:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. fix the tataloo birthday Please tnx. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rastin2 ( talk • contribs) 01:19, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
I suppose 'principal clarinetist in the national orchestra' is a plausible assertion of notability, but it's wholly unsourced.
If you want, I could put it into your userspace so you can fix that. DS ( talk) 23:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
If you want, I could put it into your userspace so you can fix that.No need. I'm hesitant to boldly move a 12-year-old article out of mainspace anyway. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for removing the speedy deletion tag on the article, I missed that it had been suggested as an AfD before. I was wondering if it would be wise to suggest it for deletion, or, in your view is Wheaton being a politician for five months likely to still meet WP:POLITICIAN eight years on? Still new-ish here:) Thanks! - OXYLYPSE ( talk) 22:01, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
is Wheaton being a politician for five months likely to still meet WP:POLITICIAN eight years on?Notability is not temporary. If he was notable eight yeas ago, he's still notable now. Adam9007 ( talk) 22:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I think its time for you to become an administrator. You have done so much for the community and anti-vandalism as a whole. I think you are ready for the burden of being an admin. Thank you. SuperGoose007 (Honk!) 03:18, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
You have done so much for the community and anti-vandalism as a whole. I think you are ready for the burden of being an admin.is quite a statement for an account that's only 9 days' old. Have you been editing as an IP before? Adam9007 ( talk) 04:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
So what was wrong with my edit on Jelle's Marble Runs? The 2nd Red Guy ( talk) 16:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
they also do stand-alone competitions around holidays with the marble names. Adam9007 ( talk) 16:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
What's the credible claim of significance on John Kinsella (criminal) ? Nick ( talk) 16:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
influential figurewhose
reputation went national. Not sure how to fit that in the article though. Adam9007 ( talk) 19:11, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
can you tell me where can i vandelize — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 ( talk • contribs) 20:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
how about in the sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
what does You currently can not change pages on Wikipedia.
The ability to change pages has been removed from this account, IP address or IP address range by DannyS712. This block affects Andrew07111712. The following reason(s) were given for this block:
Vandalism
Your IP address is 2607:fea8:3da0:4ef:1923:c9d0:c472:3dee. This block has been set to finish on: infinite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew07111712 ( talk • contribs) 20:09, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Apologies for the edit on black supremacy - was just trying to standardize the leads and didn't realize there was a -very- recent discussion on the issue. Should have done a more thorough search, just didn't realize it was so contentious. Cheers ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 15:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC) |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treasure (South Korean band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Dear Adam9007 thank you for your message at my talk, but I would like to point you out that my edits falls under at least two exceptions of the three-revert rule:
In fact your, clearly affiliated with AVEN, account maybe removed from Wikipedia as any other account which violates Wikipedia content rules and policies. AceRebel ( talk) 00:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
AVEN actions constitute conspiracy to defraudThat's a very serious accusation, especially without any evidence to back it up! As for it being contentious, the policy is:
Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to our biographies of living persons (BLP) policyThis is none of that.
account maybe removed from WikipediaAccounts cannot be removed. They are needed for attribution purposes. Adam9007 ( talk) 00:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Either you personally revert your own edit on Asexuality or I'm going to report you. AceRebel ( talk) 00:53, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
You should slow down; an admin will block him shortly. Dicklyon ( talk) 01:09, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
I've been WP:3RR blocked for too many reverts of obvious vandalism.If you were blocked for it, perhaps it wasn't actually vandalism? The mere fact that an edit breaks some rule doesn't exempt its reversion from 3RR; only the worst of the worst is exempt from it (well, any obvious vandalism falls under that, not just the horrible and disgusting type I saw yesterday on September 11 attacks).
why keep at it so rapidly?Because then, basically they win (even if only temporarily). We can't have that now, can we? You seem to be suggesting that I (we?) pretty much leave vandalism-fighting to admins. That makes no sense. Adam9007 ( talk) 15:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
request admin helpThat's what most vandal fighters do (at least after the vandal has received a level 4 warning), but most do not seem to see any reason to stop reverting. I know it's a pain, but what else are we supposed to do? There have been many times I've been on a vandal's contribution page, refreshing every few seconds and immediately reverting when I see a new edit, all whilst waiting for an admin to come along. I half wish I had the ability to block users in such instances. Adam9007 ( talk) 20:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you.
Jackmcbarn (
talk)
19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the Troll on my talk yesterday. Mot bothered to read their edits but I'm sure I can imagine. Appreciated! Glen ( talk) 05:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello? Did you see my post? I am not sure if you find it cause its under old Test Topic and you didnt answer after beeing that fast last time. So I try to push this once if you missed it. -- BIanca617 ( talk) 19:41, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Test — Preceding unsigned comment added by BIanca617 ( talk • contribs) 17:38, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Oh nooooo!!!!! I could cry!!!! Now i have to write this long text again couse it gone when publishing cause you wrote so fast :( I did a "test" first to see if I am able to write you finaly, because it shows 2 red boxes "this side is protected".
Ok. From Beginning. Hello. I saw you on dispute Page and I dont know what to do.
Seams there are 1-2 guys who hate me. They attack me all the time, stalking me, try to change my articles and beeing rude to me. An article I wrote is in one diskussion after next. Since nearly 2 Months now!!! I have no Idea what I done to them. I tryed everything. 1 of them starts with vandalism. Doing very rude edits against WP:Bio and against the sources. Just write ppov in the article and this also in a very rude way. See here https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Michel_von_Tell&diff=980267392&oldid=979733489
I dindt say something and tryed to be nice. Just add more sources. But it dosent stop. They come again and again. All the time with other stuff and often in a rude way. I try to be nice, find solutions, try to explain, bring more sources, offer friendship, everything I can. Again and again but it dont stop. :( See here /info/en/?search=User_talk:BIanca617#Marking_changes_as_'minor'
I not eaven know whats the real problem of this 1-2 guys. Do they hate me, the person from the article, do they hate girls here, or is it normal here are that many rude people? I have no Idea:( In wiki rules they say other stuff? I dont know what to do or who I can talk to. The article is good and well sourced. Every single sentence has 1-2 sources. What else can I do? Can you help me? regards -- BIanca617 ( talk) 18:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
I saw you on dispute PageWhich dispute page? I've never been involved with Michel von Tell, which seems tobe the article in question. Adam9007 ( talk) 20:05, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
Ah Hello. I know you are not. I saw you there while searching a way to get neutral person to help me or someone to talk to or anything like that. -- BIanca617 ( talk) 20:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
:( -- BIanca617 ( talk) 20:47, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
This Netaji Jayanti article is crucial. It is observed all over India. But some possible political issues, it is not declared a national holiday. Netaji was the most lovable freedom fighter and so Indians celebrate this day with great pomp. Please review it. Wikifulness ( talk) 18:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
It is an official holiday in the Indian states like West Bengal, Jharkhand, Tripura etc. Wikifulness ( talk) 18:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Sorry about this draft. I thought that redirects to the mainspace from draftspace should be removed, but I was wrong. I went to look on Wikipedia:Drafts and now I understood my error. Thanks and best regards, Paul Vaurie ( talk) 13:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi There, I believe you recommended this article for deletion? It was created for a Program page and unfortunatly, I didn't have time to get to doing some references, please can this be removed?
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MediDude4345 ( talk • contribs) 21:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi. You rejected the A7 speedy at Mon Wikipedia, because "The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance". However, I have no idea what that assertion would be. Having 700 articles after one year? Being the third? Having a total lack of independent sourcing? Nothing in that article seems to indicate any claim of importance. Fram ( talk) 16:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere, reverted to a better previous revision, or handled in some other way (see Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Alternatives to deletion)(my bolding). GreenC suggested AfD, but AfD isn't the place to propose an WP:ATD. Adam9007 ( talk) 16:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
WP:ATD-R says talk page or AfD for disputed redirects. So I guess we are both right. Not sure how to resolve that when there is a dispute over how to handle the dispute :) But in this case, the article would never survive AfD without better sourcing so I no longer dispute. -- Green C 17:57, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007,
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III ( talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill ( talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 ( talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany ( talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra ( talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren ( talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes ( talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Adam9007,
I'm just curious, how do you find these old user pages and sandboxes that have bad content on them? I can see stumbling across one occasionally but you have been tagging quite a few and I can't figure out how you would even locate them in all of the millions of user pages on the project. Thanks! Liz Read! Talk! 04:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Adam, I'm a bit confused by your removal of the speedy notice for Village Free School. You claim that schools are ineligible for A7, but I couldn't find any supporting evidence for this in our policies, or even our guidelines. Per our notability guideline:
"All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy WP:ORG, general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria. (See also WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, especially for universities
This private school doesn't appear to satisfy GNG, ORG, or even WP:CCS. All it does it attest to its existence, with its sole source. The prose itself just says it's a 501(c)3 incorporated entity. Also, none of this addresses the A3 criterion which I also tagged. Could you point me to the relevant policy? Symmachus Auxiliarus ( talk) 03:41, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
This applies to any article about a real person, individual animal, commercial or non-commercial organization, web content, or organized event that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions.As for A3, that requires no content whatsoever; even a single sentence is enough to avoid A3. Adam9007 ( talk) 23:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
The page's creator, Gokul Sites ( talk · contribs), has been blocked for self-promotion, and their userpage was deleted for the same reason. They are clearly WP:NOTHERE. I understand many users are hasty with speedy deletion, but I think the WP:G11 is appropriate in this case. It seems unlikely that the user will come back to improve the draft and get it accepted, so it will probably just get deleted under WP:G13 in six months anyway. I suggest you restore the G11 tag. -- Un assiolo ( talk) 22:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Joe Bloggs is an entrepreneur and digital marketer. He is a founder of XYZ. There are those who believe such drafts should be left for G13. Also, believe it or not, there's actually talk of making drafts exempt from G11. Adam9007 ( talk) 22:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Nick ( talk) 22:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to dateWhy do I get the feeling that this does involve some issue with my contributions? Adam9007 ( talk) 22:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Adam9007,
Many thanks for your edit on Wexham Park Hospital and changing it to Slough. It is in the ward of Wexham Lea, to be exact but that is part of Slough Borough Council anyway. The attached link confirms that it is in Wexham Lea, a ward of Slough, most of the surrounding boundary is Buckinghamshire. [1]
Regards,
Mabbs001 ( talk) 01:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
It is in the ward of Wexham LeaI know :). I checked on Google Earth; it's literally right on the boundary, but definitely on Slough's side. I thought that might constitute original research, but thankfully sources back it up. Is the fact it's in Wexham Lea worth mentioning in the article? Despite the sources, I can see that being challenged. What's also confuses matters is that (I think) 'Wexham' sometimes includes Wexham Lea as well as the part in Buckinghamshire, but the article on Wexham is definitely about the latter. Adam9007 ( talk) 02:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Adam9007, kindly let an admin decide if its a test page or not. I'd appreciate you not removing the tag until an admin reviews and declines my request. I'm restoring the tags back. Thank you. -- Ashley yoursmile! 17:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
review the content of these pagesYou just said they're empty..... Adam9007 ( talk) 18:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I won't revert again at Wikipedia:Citing sources, so you have free rein at the guideline afaic if you want to declare a dispute that doesn't exist. If you want to discuss at Talk, discuss. You don't need an Rfc to show that there is no dispute about this point, but suit yourself. Happy editing! Mathglot ( talk) 17:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
You going to stop fucking about removing valid CSD tags, or do I need to block you ? Nick ( talk) 21:03, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
NPJD is an eSports team that plays multiple types of video games(in the history) is meaningful content. Adam9007 ( talk) 21:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
You'll need to explain to many of us why deleting material now that would otherwise be deleted a short time later is a waste of time6 months via G13 isn't "a short time". If anything, it's too long: see Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G13_deletionism (where I suggested lowering it to 1 month).
And why you think your interpretation of what constitutes a test page is correct and others are wrongWell, I thought that test edits are edits clearly meant for testing purposes. Not attempts to put something on Wikipedia, however misguided. I stand by what I said in the WT:CSD discussion: if it wouldn't be G2'd (or G1'd or whatever) in article space, there's no reason it should be in draft space, regardless of what other criteria may apply in article space. Adam9007 ( talk) 21:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
In short, if it is understandable, G1 does not apply.and so Draft:NPJD is blatantly not in scope ( user:1234qwer1234qwer4 needs to be cautioned about that (yes it was an edit summary, but that's irrelevant - putting the two together means that there is understandable content and so G1 does not apply). Sending it to MFD would be a waste of time, as if everybody had just left it alone it would have been deleted under G13 in a couple of months. Unless a draft is actively harmful (i.e. oversightable, subject to WP:CSD#G10 or a copyright violation) then doing anything other than ignoring it is a waste of everybody's time. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
You going to sort out Adam's complete clusterfuck of MfDsMy point is that if such pages are going to be deleted pre-G13, I for one would much rather it's via some sort of vetting process. It just seems much fairer. Adam9007 ( talk) 21:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm sorry for coming in quite so strong with the "fucking about" remark and block threat, plus the other rudeness elsewhere.
I'll leave others to decide whether your mass MfDing of Drafts is appropriate and/or worthwhile. I'd suggest, as per
Thryduulf, that if you spot an errant speedy deletion tag on a Draft, just remove it and leave it, don't go with MfD, but as I've say, it's something I'm going to leave for others to decide whether you should be pushing stuff like that through MfD at all.
Nick (
talk)
22:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I'd suggest, as per Thryduulf, that if you spot an errant speedy deletion tag on a Draft, just remove it and leave it, don't go with MfDHang on, you started this thread after I removed a couple of improper CSD tags
I'm sorry for the mess I created yesterday. Some of the drafts I nominated for deletion as test pages were deleted by Liz. Not sure whether restoring them is worth it or not. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 ( 𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Ahem. Remember when I said it would be best for you to leave off removing CSD's? Are there new problems or old problems? I guess the gist is you are removing CSD tags that you should not-- same as before? (clears throat). Please do not remove CSD tags, you still lack the judgment to remove them in a non disruptive manner. I've been an admin a long time, and don't always agree with CSD tags, but I leave them for another admin to decide 'cause we all read WP:CSD a little differently. Plus all the points made above. Once again, please leave the CSD tags for an admin to evaluate. There are better things you could do with your time. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Prior discussion on this subject in which I partook. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Gayming Magazine Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Adam! Why did you retire? What's going on? :-( ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 05:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2021, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2019, the project has:
|
Content
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2019
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
Thank you for your efforts in patrolling new pages. I wanted to let you know that I have applied a speedy deletion tag to the article Index Case (album), which you proposed for deletion, because I believe it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion. In cases where it applies, speedy deletion is preferable to proposed deletion; in the future, please tag blatantly inappropriate pages for speedy deletion first if they meet the criteria. I have left the {{ prod}} tag in place, so that if speedy deletion is rejected, your proposed deletion will remain in place. Thanks!
Hello Adam9007,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Musha.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Musha.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:53, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Musha.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:BLP no footnotes has been
nominated for merging with
Template:No footnotes. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.
🐶 EpicPupper (he/him |
talk)
22:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tony Hernandez (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dsuke1998AEOS ( talk) 00:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)