Tutorial | Discussion |
New page feed |
Reviewers |
Curation tool Suggestions |
Coordination |
This page is for New Page Reviewers to discuss the process with each other and to ask for and provide help to fellow reviewers. Discussion also takes place on our Discord server ( invite link) For discussions on other matters, such as bugs, etc., please navigate through the tabs, or go to the discussion pages of the relevant policies. For discussion on topics purely relevant to coordination tasks, such as for example - but not only - Backlog Drives, etc., please post at Coordination Talk |
Top New Page Reviewers database report (updated by bot 2x daily) |
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 20 sections are present. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Howdy folks.
Looking at the article backlog graph, I think we need to have 3–4 article only backlog drives a year to maintain our current backlog levels and prevent major backlog growth. 4 backlog drives a year is too many for burnout reasons. So I think we should consider 3 backlog drives a year that focus on articles only (no redirects). That's a cadence of one every 4 months. Our last one was in January, so that would mean we should look into doing another backlog drive in May.
Thoughts on this? Shall we move forward, or do we need to adjust the details? Thanks. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 08:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:R from miscapitalisation § Template intent. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Auwalu Abdullahi Rano get Wikipedia notability but it was not appear in a searching Engine. Because Auwalu Abdullahi Rano was a Nigerian Businessman, oil tycoon, and public figure. Bamalli01 ( talk) 05:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I am the new guy on the block, so the following problems might be between the chair and the keyboard. Still,
I wound up always manually deleting the tag due to #2, and at least once accidentally deleted the redirect due to #1. Any pointers will be appreciated. Викидим ( talk) 17:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:New Page Reviewer granted § Survey on what bullets/tips/Discord links to include. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 19:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello New pages patrol,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The fifth criterion may be rather confusing. Does it means that one should not have blocks in place in the last six month or blocks placed in the last 6mo? Too curious to ask this because I have had a partial block from August to November; I would theoretically be ineligible for the rights until June if the criterion meant active blocks withing the duration. Toadette ( Let's talk together!) 19:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, NPPers,
I have a question I hope someone can answer. I see a lot of draft articles and I monitor the Move log so I see a lot of articles that have been moved from User space to main space by new editors. When I first started doing this, I'd see a link stating "Mark this page as patrolled" at the bottom of all of the new pages added to main space. Now, I only see this tag on about half of the new pages (or fewer than that) that are added so I'm worried that these new articles are not appearing on the page lists that NPPers monitor. I check the page log to see if the article has already been reviewed and they never are. Has something changed in the bot or mechanism that tags new articles? Are new articles not reviewed if they are moved from Draft space to main space? Are there other reasons why this patrol link would not appear on the page? Lots of questions I've been wondering for a few weeks now. Thanks for any answers you can offer. Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for mentioning the NPP Browser tool in the April 2024 Newsletter. I have not seen this before, and think it is fantastic and rather helpful. FULBERT ( talk) 14:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello all, someone emailed me asking to create an article for pay for Sonu Sharma, a motivational speaker. I was concerned about how they obtained my email address, as I use it exclusively for Wikipedia. Given my strict stance against paid editing, I declined the request. If any reviewer comes across an article creation for Sonu Sharma, please remember to check for any UPE/COI concerns. Thanks. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 16:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I got a bot invite to consider joining New Page Patrol. Sounded interesting, so I started reading the tutorial. Came to the section entitled “Reviewing — Basic Steps” and saw this:
Are you f*** kidding?
If that’s the “Basic Steps”, I can’t imagine what the “Advanced steps” are. Probably require a post-graduate degree.
Sorry, I’m out. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk) 02:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
An editor just starting out NPP doesn’t need to know about patrolling redirects or other pages– We review articles and redirects. These are precisely what users need to know off the bat. Additionally, if we broke everything up into sub pages it would become more difficult to find relevant info. In it's current state, we can more easily find info on the page with the search function. Not saying there aren't improvements that can be made, but splitting things info further subpages doesn't seem beneficial to me.
I think that that chart is both very useful and also misleading. I think very useful because it covers practically all of the potential tasks and practically all of the potential scenarios. I'd rather have that than a chart that is missing things where I'd have to spend hours scratching my head trying to learn what's missing and learning it rather take a few extra minutes to read that big chart. On the flip side, if every NPP'er did a super thorough job on every task and possibility, we'd have a 2,000,000 article backlog instead of a 14,000 article one. Or get discouraged feeling guilty for not spending 1 hour per article doing a super thorough job on every task and possibility. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 17:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Usually I can easily just click on "Check for copyvio" on the NPP toolbar, but for these few days the tool seems to not be working. It says "Calculating copyvio percentage" but the result never came out. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The complaint above was not expressed very nicely but does hit on a relatively frequent point of feedback about Wikipedia:New pages patrol, which is that the various flowcharts and diagrams might put people off more than they help.
There are currently only two flowcharts left on the page. To help decide whether they should be there, could we have a quick straw poll on whether current NPPers find them useful or not? – Joe ( talk) 12:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Do you find Novem Linguae's File:Simplified NPP flowchart for articles.png useful? Or did you, when you were new to reviewing?
Do you find Insertcleverphrasehere's File:NPP flowchart.svg useful? Or did you, when you were new to reviewing?
Is that the right question? Should the question be "When you were new to NPP, did you find the flowcharts useful?", as MrSB's point is that they are offputting for new or potential NPP volunteers. Whether they are useful as an aide-memoire for experienced NPPers is a different question. Pam D 13:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Enforcing ECR for article creators. One possible outcome (Question 1, Option D) would affect the workflow of new page reviewers. – Joe ( talk) 13:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
As a heads up, for consistency with other templates, I will move a few templates relating to the deletion notices on user talk pages such as Template:RFDNote-NPF and Template:AfD-notice-NPF, and this can be impacted a lot. Toadette ( Let's talk together!) 14:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Honestly it might make sense to get rid of these custom NPR deletion templates and just use the standard template. Not sure we need all this code duplication. But that's something to discuss after everything is moved back and we're at the status quo ante. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 05:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I clicked on the close button, the little 'x' at the top of the toolbar, by mistake. Now I can't see my toolbar. How can I restore this? As far as I can tell, it is no longer there. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 00:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
For clarity here is an image: [2]. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 00:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
00:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
{{ Sentnote-NPF}} still includes the advice to sign posts with tildes, which is unneeded now that that is done automatically by the reply tool. It also asks for a ping on reply to the editor who left the note. We should be able to take this out as well by having the Page Curation tool by automatically subscribe the reviewer to the section. How would that be changed? Sdkb talk 17:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
<!-- copy this as it appears rendered on the page, not from the edit screen-->
as a note between the <code><nowiki> </nowiki></code>
tags because I've seen people copy <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>
right in their replies.
microbiologyMarcus
petri dish·
growths 17:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)leaving extra instruction isn't hurting anyoneThis is a really common (and understandable) belief — and it's 100% wrong. It's the main reason our guidance is filled with an impenetrable maze of WP:CREEP. And a wide body of usability research shows that what it causes is not for users to read and understand the extra instruction, but rather to go "that's too long" and not read any of the instruction, thus missing out on the more relevant instruction that they actually needed. Sdkb talk 19:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:TFOLWP requires attribution in an edit summary (in a prescribed form: "Content in this edit is translated from the existing [source language] Wikipedia article at [[:[source language code]:Exact name of [source language] article]]; see its history for attribution.") of articles translated from Wikipedias in other languages in order to preserve edit history, copyright and so on. When articles are translated using the translation tool, a much shorter edit summary note is added automatically: 'Created by translating the page "[[:[source language code]:Exact name of [source language] article]]'. Is this an adequate replacement for the WP:TFOLWP wording, or should that be added separately? Ingratis ( talk) 08:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
OK - thanks all - that's v helpful. Best, Ingratis ( talk) 11:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at WT:Drafts regarding a proposed split of WP:Drafts. The thread is WT:Drafts#Split into help page and guideline. Thank you. S0091 ( talk) 17:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello y'all. Today I encountered the same problem like few days back, the copyvio tool on the toolbar is not working anymore. Are y'all experiencing the same thing as well? The error is similar with few days ago - it stuck at "Calculating copyvio percentage". Pinging @ DannyS712 as the creator of this great script and @ DreamRimmer and @ Novem Linguae that assisted on this problem last time. Have a pleasant day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
502 Bad Gateway.
An error occurred while using the search engine (Google Error: HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests). Note: there is a daily limit on the number of search queries the tool is allowed to make. You may repeat the check without using the search engine.
{"status": "error", "error": {"code": "search_error", "info": "An error occurred while using the search engine; try reloading or setting 'use_engine' to 0"}}.
Tutorial | Discussion |
New page feed |
Reviewers |
Curation tool Suggestions |
Coordination |
This page is for New Page Reviewers to discuss the process with each other and to ask for and provide help to fellow reviewers. Discussion also takes place on our Discord server ( invite link) For discussions on other matters, such as bugs, etc., please navigate through the tabs, or go to the discussion pages of the relevant policies. For discussion on topics purely relevant to coordination tasks, such as for example - but not only - Backlog Drives, etc., please post at Coordination Talk |
Top New Page Reviewers database report (updated by bot 2x daily) |
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 20 sections are present. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Howdy folks.
Looking at the article backlog graph, I think we need to have 3–4 article only backlog drives a year to maintain our current backlog levels and prevent major backlog growth. 4 backlog drives a year is too many for burnout reasons. So I think we should consider 3 backlog drives a year that focus on articles only (no redirects). That's a cadence of one every 4 months. Our last one was in January, so that would mean we should look into doing another backlog drive in May.
Thoughts on this? Shall we move forward, or do we need to adjust the details? Thanks. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 08:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:R from miscapitalisation § Template intent. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:33, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Auwalu Abdullahi Rano get Wikipedia notability but it was not appear in a searching Engine. Because Auwalu Abdullahi Rano was a Nigerian Businessman, oil tycoon, and public figure. Bamalli01 ( talk) 05:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
I am the new guy on the block, so the following problems might be between the chair and the keyboard. Still,
I wound up always manually deleting the tag due to #2, and at least once accidentally deleted the redirect due to #1. Any pointers will be appreciated. Викидим ( talk) 17:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:New Page Reviewer granted § Survey on what bullets/tips/Discord links to include. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 19:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello New pages patrol,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
The fifth criterion may be rather confusing. Does it means that one should not have blocks in place in the last six month or blocks placed in the last 6mo? Too curious to ask this because I have had a partial block from August to November; I would theoretically be ineligible for the rights until June if the criterion meant active blocks withing the duration. Toadette ( Let's talk together!) 19:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, NPPers,
I have a question I hope someone can answer. I see a lot of draft articles and I monitor the Move log so I see a lot of articles that have been moved from User space to main space by new editors. When I first started doing this, I'd see a link stating "Mark this page as patrolled" at the bottom of all of the new pages added to main space. Now, I only see this tag on about half of the new pages (or fewer than that) that are added so I'm worried that these new articles are not appearing on the page lists that NPPers monitor. I check the page log to see if the article has already been reviewed and they never are. Has something changed in the bot or mechanism that tags new articles? Are new articles not reviewed if they are moved from Draft space to main space? Are there other reasons why this patrol link would not appear on the page? Lots of questions I've been wondering for a few weeks now. Thanks for any answers you can offer. Liz Read! Talk! 05:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for mentioning the NPP Browser tool in the April 2024 Newsletter. I have not seen this before, and think it is fantastic and rather helpful. FULBERT ( talk) 14:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello all, someone emailed me asking to create an article for pay for Sonu Sharma, a motivational speaker. I was concerned about how they obtained my email address, as I use it exclusively for Wikipedia. Given my strict stance against paid editing, I declined the request. If any reviewer comes across an article creation for Sonu Sharma, please remember to check for any UPE/COI concerns. Thanks. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 16:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I got a bot invite to consider joining New Page Patrol. Sounded interesting, so I started reading the tutorial. Came to the section entitled “Reviewing — Basic Steps” and saw this:
Are you f*** kidding?
If that’s the “Basic Steps”, I can’t imagine what the “Advanced steps” are. Probably require a post-graduate degree.
Sorry, I’m out. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz ( talk) 02:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
An editor just starting out NPP doesn’t need to know about patrolling redirects or other pages– We review articles and redirects. These are precisely what users need to know off the bat. Additionally, if we broke everything up into sub pages it would become more difficult to find relevant info. In it's current state, we can more easily find info on the page with the search function. Not saying there aren't improvements that can be made, but splitting things info further subpages doesn't seem beneficial to me.
I think that that chart is both very useful and also misleading. I think very useful because it covers practically all of the potential tasks and practically all of the potential scenarios. I'd rather have that than a chart that is missing things where I'd have to spend hours scratching my head trying to learn what's missing and learning it rather take a few extra minutes to read that big chart. On the flip side, if every NPP'er did a super thorough job on every task and possibility, we'd have a 2,000,000 article backlog instead of a 14,000 article one. Or get discouraged feeling guilty for not spending 1 hour per article doing a super thorough job on every task and possibility. Sincerely, North8000 ( talk) 17:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Usually I can easily just click on "Check for copyvio" on the NPP toolbar, but for these few days the tool seems to not be working. It says "Calculating copyvio percentage" but the result never came out. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
The complaint above was not expressed very nicely but does hit on a relatively frequent point of feedback about Wikipedia:New pages patrol, which is that the various flowcharts and diagrams might put people off more than they help.
There are currently only two flowcharts left on the page. To help decide whether they should be there, could we have a quick straw poll on whether current NPPers find them useful or not? – Joe ( talk) 12:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Do you find Novem Linguae's File:Simplified NPP flowchart for articles.png useful? Or did you, when you were new to reviewing?
Do you find Insertcleverphrasehere's File:NPP flowchart.svg useful? Or did you, when you were new to reviewing?
Is that the right question? Should the question be "When you were new to NPP, did you find the flowcharts useful?", as MrSB's point is that they are offputting for new or potential NPP volunteers. Whether they are useful as an aide-memoire for experienced NPPers is a different question. Pam D 13:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Enforcing ECR for article creators. One possible outcome (Question 1, Option D) would affect the workflow of new page reviewers. – Joe ( talk) 13:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
As a heads up, for consistency with other templates, I will move a few templates relating to the deletion notices on user talk pages such as Template:RFDNote-NPF and Template:AfD-notice-NPF, and this can be impacted a lot. Toadette ( Let's talk together!) 14:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Honestly it might make sense to get rid of these custom NPR deletion templates and just use the standard template. Not sure we need all this code duplication. But that's something to discuss after everything is moved back and we're at the status quo ante. – Novem Linguae ( talk) 05:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I clicked on the close button, the little 'x' at the top of the toolbar, by mistake. Now I can't see my toolbar. How can I restore this? As far as I can tell, it is no longer there. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 00:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
For clarity here is an image: [2]. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 00:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Hilst
[talk]
00:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
{{ Sentnote-NPF}} still includes the advice to sign posts with tildes, which is unneeded now that that is done automatically by the reply tool. It also asks for a ping on reply to the editor who left the note. We should be able to take this out as well by having the Page Curation tool by automatically subscribe the reviewer to the section. How would that be changed? Sdkb talk 17:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
<!-- copy this as it appears rendered on the page, not from the edit screen-->
as a note between the <code><nowiki> </nowiki></code>
tags because I've seen people copy <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>
right in their replies.
microbiologyMarcus
petri dish·
growths 17:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)leaving extra instruction isn't hurting anyoneThis is a really common (and understandable) belief — and it's 100% wrong. It's the main reason our guidance is filled with an impenetrable maze of WP:CREEP. And a wide body of usability research shows that what it causes is not for users to read and understand the extra instruction, but rather to go "that's too long" and not read any of the instruction, thus missing out on the more relevant instruction that they actually needed. Sdkb talk 19:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
WP:TFOLWP requires attribution in an edit summary (in a prescribed form: "Content in this edit is translated from the existing [source language] Wikipedia article at [[:[source language code]:Exact name of [source language] article]]; see its history for attribution.") of articles translated from Wikipedias in other languages in order to preserve edit history, copyright and so on. When articles are translated using the translation tool, a much shorter edit summary note is added automatically: 'Created by translating the page "[[:[source language code]:Exact name of [source language] article]]'. Is this an adequate replacement for the WP:TFOLWP wording, or should that be added separately? Ingratis ( talk) 08:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
OK - thanks all - that's v helpful. Best, Ingratis ( talk) 11:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at WT:Drafts regarding a proposed split of WP:Drafts. The thread is WT:Drafts#Split into help page and guideline. Thank you. S0091 ( talk) 17:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello y'all. Today I encountered the same problem like few days back, the copyvio tool on the toolbar is not working anymore. Are y'all experiencing the same thing as well? The error is similar with few days ago - it stuck at "Calculating copyvio percentage". Pinging @ DannyS712 as the creator of this great script and @ DreamRimmer and @ Novem Linguae that assisted on this problem last time. Have a pleasant day! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
502 Bad Gateway.
An error occurred while using the search engine (Google Error: HTTP Error 429: Too Many Requests). Note: there is a daily limit on the number of search queries the tool is allowed to make. You may repeat the check without using the search engine.
{"status": "error", "error": {"code": "search_error", "info": "An error occurred while using the search engine; try reloading or setting 'use_engine' to 0"}}.