 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for
historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
 | This page in a nutshell: Subjects of articles on biological taxons that have been assigned systematic names, whether traditional rank-based names or cladistic names, are generally considered notable. |
This guideline is meant to reflect consensus about the notability of biological taxa, whether traditional rank-based names or cladistic names, are generally considered notable. The assignment of a name by the naming authority, which reflects publication in a learned journal, generally is sufficient to support coverage by Wikipedia.
|
| This page is currently inactive and is retained for
historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
| This page in a nutshell: Subjects of articles on biological taxons that have been assigned systematic names, whether traditional rank-based names or cladistic names, are generally considered notable. |
This guideline is meant to reflect consensus about the notability of biological taxa, whether traditional rank-based names or cladistic names, are generally considered notable. The assignment of a name by the naming authority, which reflects publication in a learned journal, generally is sufficient to support coverage by Wikipedia.